Politapocalypse (U.S. Politics Megathread)

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 2595 of total 2595 in this topic
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Original Post - Nov 28, 2015 - 04:59am PT
Another attempt at a US politics megathread. The goal is civil (if contentious) political discussion. Most of your political cartoons are bad. Use your words.

Existing (and hopefully soon to die) political threads:
Ready for Donald?
Ready for Hillary?
I'm so proud of my President
Ready for Bernie?
Ready for Cruz?


The Presidential Election:
Always at the top of everyone's attention (warranted or not) and the most covered by media. The contenders:

Republicans:
Ben Carson
Donald Trump
Marco Rubio
Carly Fiorina
John Kasich
Jeb Bush
Ted Cruz
Chris Christie
Rick Santorum
Mike Huckaby
Rand Paul
George Pataki

Also Rans:
Rick "Oops" Perry - Governor of Texas, bespectacled intellectual...and..what was that third thing?
Scott "Union Buster" Walker - Gatekeeper to the Second Gilded Age
Bobby Jindal

Democrats:
Hillary Clinton
Bernard "Bernie" Sanders
Martin O'Malley
Vermin Supreme

Also Rans:
Jim "I killed a guy in 'Nam" Webb - ran out of time
Lincoln "Goofy Ass Grin" Chaffee - not the only farrier to not become President

Debates:
GOP Debate: CNN, December 15, 2015, Nevada
DNC Debate: ABC, December 19, New Hampshire
GOP Debate: Fox News, January 2016, Iowa
DNC Debate: NBC, January 17, NBC
GOP Debate: ABC News, February 2016, New Hampshire
GOP Debate: CBS News, February 2016, South Carolina
GOP Debate: NBC/Telemundo, February 2016, Florida
July 18, 2016: RNC begins in Cleveland
July 25, 2016: DNC begins in Philadelphia
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 05:13am PT
An apparently white man killed 3 people and injured 9 others in a Colorado Planned Parenthood and then had a shootout with police. He had what may have been explosive devices as well.

Four white men were arrested for shooting Black Lives Matter protesters in Minnesota.

These are horrible tragedies of the type that happen all too frequently in our country. They are also great examples of how media coverage and cultural assumptions about the actions of white perpetrators is treated completely differently than that of black, muslim, middle-eastern assailants. Nobody will suggest that these are terrorist attacks (though the very definition of a hate crime is essentially that) and nobody will call for the greater white culture to apologize for the actions of what will be portrayed as marginalized individuals. Why is that?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:49am PT
More for ya...

Trump is an evil piece of sh#t.
Turkey shoots down Russian warplane
Donald Trump Doesn't Want to Win
Ready for Romney (again)????
You guys posting graphic, bloody photos SUCK! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
#IStandWithAhmed [OT]
Another active shooter armed stand off in progress.
Obamacare.......

And your observations are correct. Your answer: fear and bigotry.

You have a better chance of being killed by am American with a gun (easily purchased) than a Syrian refugee.
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:07am PT
Welcome to Chicago HighDesertDJ
Year To Date
Shot & Killed: 405
Shot & Wounded: 2321
Total Shot: 2726
Total Homicides: 457

Race of Victim/Assailant

Race Victim Assailant
Black 357 83
Hispanic 72 19
White/Other 17 10
Police - 7
Unknown 10 -


Is the news coverage to be done by the percentages of race to crimes?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:03am PT
Oh you are soooooooooooo fked now Clinker... so royally fked.

May I add the following, FACTS...



And your observations are correct. Your answer: fear and bigotry.

Oh the ongoing hypocritical ironeeeee...^^^^^^






mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:09am PT
I think the reason that people get more upset about police killing people than criminals killing people is because you expect criminals to kill people, but you expect police to be trying to prevent that, not doing it. And only a crazy few blame all police. Do you really think all liberals believe these things? Or are you generalizing in exactly the same way you criticize people for generalizing?

My contribution to the megathread: Trump is an evil piece of shit!

Edit: cool, if you write shit! with an exclamation point, it doesn't get muddled. However, my experiments reveal that there seems to be no general rule at work here.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:18am PT
Conservatives blame all Muslims for the crimes of a few
but never blame the few bad cops for anything.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:25am PT
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:29am PT
On cue with the childish sidewall busting pic.
Childish behavoir from a frightened child.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:52am PT
It would be good for the site to corral the political rancor to a mega thread like it used to be before the wingnutz cried so much about politics crowding climbing content out. Oddly they then proceeded to start an appalling number of inane political threads about everything.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:53am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:58am PT
It must be a terrible mental conflict to be so in love with authoritarianism and so in hate with Government.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:08am PT
You lefties are a hate crime. How miserable you must be. Channel your self loathing for some affirmative action. It's never too late for your own post partum abortion. Be positive, act alone, silently, only on your selves, and today.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:29am PT
Nice try with the thread idea, but this will fail, as most others have, when the Chief sucks all of the air out of the room.
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:31am PT
Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are. -- Benjamin Franklin

Men often mistake killing and revenge for justice. They seldom have the stomach for justice. -- Robert Jordan

Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:32am PT
Another attempt at a US politics megathread. The goal is civil (if contentious) political discussion.

Well, that lasted almost two hours. Until Philo and The Chief woke up, turned on their computers, and destroyed the thread for everybody else.

Why don't you two start a special thread of your own? Better yet, Philo could start a "The Chief is an as#@&%e" thread, and The Chief could start a "Philo is an as#@&%e" thread, and you could shriek at one another to your hearts' content without polluting every thread on this site.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:33am PT
^^^ Excellent Clinker.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:38am PT
Ghost here's a suggestion if you don't like it don't read and comment.
That is how adults do it.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:49am PT
Phil, you miss the point.

I'm all for you and the Chief, and whoever else wants to join in, having your "You're an as#@&%e" "No, you're an as#@&%e" "F*#k you" "Well, f*#k you" conversation.

But I'm curious about why you are so inconsiderate that you have to do it on every single political thread. You're like selfish, spoiled eight-year-olds. You seem completely unable to understand that the world does not revolve around your need to hate.

Seriously -- why can't you confine your hatred to one or two threads? Why must you spill it into every political thread?
RyanD

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:52am PT



philo

climber

Nov 28, 2015 - 07:52am PT
It would be good for the site to corral the political rancor to a mega thread like it used to be before the wingnutz cried so much about politics crowding climbing content out. Oddly they then proceeded to start an appalling number of inane political threads about everything.

Hahahaha!!

Observation skills:

10/10

Edit-


Ghost's observation skills:

10/10


Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 08:55am PT
Ghost, why do you spew your hate on every thread about other posters?

Why?
Why can't posters just post without either you or WTF or the Chief or a gang of other right wingers losers posting how much you hate them, and hate them posting some information that you don't agree with.

Please specify any "hate' that Philo posted.
You guys are just gang piling on philo because he is the latest target for you guys to jump all over with some stupid blame game.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 09:03am PT
Chief: Your definition of "fact" is pretty biased. I'm curious though, if the disproportionate killing of black people (armed and unarmed) by police is due to only a few police officers who are not representative of police at large, why is there a pervasive lack of prosecution for wrongful death? How is this not a cultural problem on the part of governmental power structures? And how is that a government who you insist over and over again can only screw things up when it comes to tax and economic policy be defended as unquestionable when it comes to life or death decisions?

There is a big difference between saying "all police are corrupt" and saying "police are part of a pervasive institutional racism that results in a disproportionate number of black deaths." If people of color can't even trust the people who are supposed to protect them, how are they supposed to live normal American lives?

Also, what gives with the "here's one black guy I found who appears to reinforce the opinion that I already have that allows me to ignore the millions of black people who disagree with me?"

The point of my original post was to point out that if the perpetrators of the crimes I linked were Muslim or middle-eastern the term "terrorism" would be thrown about with abandon.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:14am PT
What happened to the other politapocalypse thread?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:24am PT
The Growing Right-Wing Terror Threat
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html?_r=0


The main terrorist threat in the United States is not from violent Muslim extremists, but from right-wing extremists. Just ask the police.

In a survey we conducted with the Police Executive Research Forum last year of 382 law enforcement agencies, 74 percent reported anti-government extremism as one of the top three terrorist threats in their jurisdiction; 39 percent listed extremism connected with Al Qaeda or like-minded terrorist organizations. And only 3 percent identified the threat from Muslim extremists as severe, compared with 7 percent for anti-government and other forms of extremism.


I guess ric was wrong, us liberals are not miserable, we are happy not to be a right winger on the FBI watch list.



Why not register and track Right Wing Christians? They hate our Government and our President.

Is Trump going to deport the Real Threat to America?
No, it's easier to blame and point fingers at some other minority group for our problems.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:52am PT
The real danger old Fry master is the division you and others constantly peddle. Your not celebrating diversity. Rather, because of your self loathing that you blame on a station in life you feel is imposed on you by others, you seek to bring what you falsely identify as those responsible down to your level of misery. We here, are just old and new climbers, we aren't responsible for your condition any more than any far removed ideology you constantly rail about. Accept sole responsibility for your own life and circumstance and the delusions will fade from view with the renewed focus on your path forward.

Of course, I could be very wrong; you might be a low level paid political hack.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:54am PT
Tradhog care to illucidate why you feel compelled to attempt to leg hump me every chance you get? Try being an adult and ignoring what you don't like.


Seriously Rick are you 12?
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 28, 2015 - 10:28am PT
Seriously Philo? What are you 85 with a completely calcified brain? You sew discord like an endlessly repeating broken record of inspirational Hitler speeches.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 10:32am PT
Ha ha ha wingnutz away.
Funny words from the resident fascist.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 10:55am PT
apogee asked
What happened to the other politapocalypse thread?

It got locked for some reason. I couldn't find that any of the other political threads got locked. I wrote an email asking for an explanation and have gotten no response.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 11:26am PT
Rick Sumner posted
The real danger old Fry master is the division you and others constantly peddle. Your not celebrating diversity. Rather, because of your self loathing that you blame on a station in life you feel is imposed on you by others, you seek to bring what you falsely identify as those responsible down to your level of misery. We here, are just old and new climbers, we aren't responsible for your condition any more than any far removed ideology you constantly rail about. Accept sole responsibility for your own life and circumstance and the delusions will fade from view with the renewed focus on your path forward.

This is a very well articulated example of the kind of defensive response to the idea that we have system that plays a very strong role in how people fare. Many people have a tough time separating systemic problems from individual responsibility (i.e. police as a whole treat black people very differently than non-whites so all police are racist or economic inequality is reinforced by public policy so it's the government's fault that I'm poor). Both things can in fact be true. People can be personally responsible for their own situation AND have the deck stacked horribly against them by a system rigged to do so. It's a classic white guilt sort of defense. It's a lot more comfortable to blame people for their situations than to have to accept some level of responsibility that we are all complicit in it.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Nov 28, 2015 - 11:26am PT

If police shooting video had been released sooner, would Emanuel be mayor?

Kass: If Laquan were out, even a hug from the president wouldn't have saved Rahm

Would Mayor Rahm Emanuel have been re-elected if voters had seen the video of Laquan McDonald's execution?

No.

Rahm would have lost the election. Why? Because he would have lost Chicago's black vote.

Without the black vote, Rahm Emanuel would not be the 9.5-fingered boss of Bartertown.

Black political figures would have been uneasy standing with Rahm. They would have run away. They couldn't stand with him.

Not if that video came out during the election campaign, the video showing white cop Jason Van Dyke shooting McDonald, hitting him with two rounds, and then, with McDonald on the ground, hitting him with 14 more shots.

Emanuel could have even sat in President Barack Obama's lap for a photo — both of them wearing matching Dr. Denton pajamas (the kind with the feet) and sipping identical cups of cocoa.
Warning, graphic content: Laquan McDonald shooting dash-cam video

Warning graphic content: Chicago officials released the police dash-cam video of the October 2014 fatal shooting of Laquan McDonald, 17, by a Chicago police officer. Warning: This video contains graphic images. The Chicago Tribune edited this version only for length.

And that still wouldn't have saved him.

So Emanuel buried the video. And black politicians and clergy got busy getting out the vote for Rahm. He won the April 7 runoff election, and only then did he have the aldermen vote to pay a $5 million settlement to the McDonald family.

If the video had been out, if Chicago had watched it before going to the polls, Emanuel would have lost the black vote. You'd have to be a meat puppet to think otherwise. And you're not a meat puppet, are you?

But just to make sure of my theory, I called the one guy who'd know: Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, the mayor's opponent in the 2015 election.

"Yes," Garcia told me over the phone. "That video would definitely have changed the political environment.

"The rug would have been pulled out from under many political leaders' feet. Things would have been different," he said.
Emanuel holds others accountable on police shooting video, not himself
Emanuel holds others accountable on police shooting video, not himself

"And now, with the video out and people seeing it, everywhere I go people ask me about it. Everywhere I go people tell me it would have been a game changer. If people had seen it, they would have said, this city is so corrupt, it's time for a change."

But they didn't see it, until it was too late.

"There's just some basic Chicago arithmetic in there. He wouldn't have received as much votes from the African-American community," Garcia said. "It isn't rocket science. It's arithmetic. And so yes, this tragic video would have had a profound impact."

Which is why Rahm didn't want it to be seen, why he had to do everything to keep it under wraps. And he did do everything to keep it under wraps, until the other day.

"And that's the Chicago Way," Garcia said.

Yes it is.

You can see the truth of it by watching the other politicians scrambling for cover in the wake of the Laquan McDonald video release.

They don't like questions about how they helped Rahm win. That puts the jacket on them. And they don't want to wear the jacket.

So they're stitching one up for Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, who charged Van Dyke with murder the other day.

They want Alvarez to wear the jacket for it all.

Rahm seems to be throwing her under his bus, but he doesn't want his fingerprints on her. So his ally, David Axelrod, threw her under.

Axelrod is a Rahm pal, but for years he was also the mouthpiece for former Mayor Richard Daley, and was the top political and media strategist for Obama. It's a Chicago thing.

"Why did it take a year to indict a CPD officer who shot a kid 16 times?" Axelrod tweeted Tuesday night. "Would it have happened today if judge hadn't ordered video release?"

That puts it on Alvarez. Does she deserve it?

I don't think so. To me, she's not the issue.

The video threatened Rahm Emanuel and his pursuit of power. Alvarez told reporters she'd been waiting for the feds to issue a joint announcement with her office. That didn't happen.

Funny how things work out.

Axelrod's tweet legitimizes a self-preservation tactic Chicago politicians have been pursuing for the last day or so: They know people are angry over what happened to 17-year-old McDonald. They want to be safe from that anger. So they're directing the mob to go against Alvarez.

On Wednesday, I headed over to my old haunts at City Hall to see the circus in action. The City Council's Black Caucus had called a news conference, and there, in one rambling, cloudy speech after another, they made it clear they weren't responsible for a thing and that there needed to be changes.

Not their jobs. And not Rahm's. Instead, they saved their outrage for police Superintendent Garry McCarthy and Alvarez. Then they rambled some more.

But even in cloudy waters you might still see a slippery bullhead, if you can spot the fins or the chin whiskers. And so I reached down, got my hand wet and asked:

Would Emanuel have won the African-American vote if that video had been seen before the election?

Most just looked at me as if I were a space alien saying "I come in peace" in some frightening alien tongue of clicks and whistles that they couldn't understand.

Later, I cornered one of the aldermen and asked again.

"No," said the alderman, meaning no, Rahm would not have won the election. "But you already knew that. Why are you asking us?"

jskass@tribpub.com

Twitter @John_Kass
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 11:35am PT
Great posts HDDJ, you are on a roll.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Nov 28, 2015 - 11:47am PT
Several GOP presidential contenders have advocated treating the nation’s growing heroin epidemic as a health crisis, not a criminal one. But most stop short of advocating the same approach to other drug laws, notably those involving marijuana and crack cocaine, which disproportionately affect African Americans.

Such views highlight the resonance and reach of the opiate epidemic — but also a persistent racial and geographic divide in American politics. The heroin epidemic has overwhelmingly hit whites. It has also skyrocketed to the top of voters’ lists of political priorities in the same bands of America — rural states, the suburbs and notably the early voting state of New Hampshire — that track directly with where Republicans must perform well to win back the White House next year.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 12:56pm PT
That's right, Ken. It's a great example of how public policy gets shaped when things are happening to "us" and not "them." It's also the right thing to do.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 03:36pm PT
We have division alright

One side tries to consider all angles, science, facts, other peoples feelings, injustice and how to make things better for all.

The other side uses lies, misinformation and propaganda to demonize the other side because they don't have anything to offer.

They lie about climate change, evolution, politics, the liberal progressive cause, and everything else in the way of their greed and quest for power.

They have highly paid shills that lie 24/7 about how bad the liberals are.
They project their worst qualities on their enemy.
They cheat and steal elections.

Everything bad about this country is a result of their policies,
all the debt, all the deregulation, crumbling infrastructure, bad schools, homeless vets, high suicide rates, offshored labor
Not a single policy they have is good for the general population, it's all aimed at making the rich richer and the poor poorer, be able to pollute more, cheat more, screw someone more.

Their deception knows no bounds, the right wing have created a deeply divided country based on lies. Then they blame the liberals for the division.

History has shown us how easily the populace can be divided by lies, there are personalities that would rather believe lies so they can justify their hate. It is a typical right wing response, blame the others, divide and conquer.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 03:39pm PT
Well said Craig
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Nov 28, 2015 - 03:44pm PT
In politics stupidity is not a handicap. -- Napoleon Bonaparte

Cheers to reaching new heights.
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Nov 28, 2015 - 03:48pm PT
This incorporates politics and Boobs [Click to View YouTube Video]with classic country and old rock n' roll
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 28, 2015 - 04:44pm PT
Bravo Craig. But for a few names you have the left wingers down to T in your little rant above.

Let's get specific though: Obama, "there is no red America there is no blue America there is only the United states of america", " what is not patriotic is running up the debt like Bush did", " if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor", " the average premium will decrease by $2500", " climate change is the number 1 existential threat to mankind not the contained JV team of ISIL". Hillary: " I dodged sniper fire on the tarmac in Bosnia", "Benghazi was the result of an offensive video", " none of the emails were classified".

And these stellar truth tellers are the "leaders "you idiots elevate to a platform to worship. Pathetic. Get out of L.A. with your family before all your brain cells are destroyed.
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 04:47pm PT
Rick why do you hate America?

Who are these worshipers of which you speak?
Have you conveniently forgotten the state of near implosion that Geoge W Bush left this country in?
Have you forgotten how any dissent against the Bush neocon party line and agenda would get people lablled as traitors or worse?

Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance, Obama Derangement Syndrome (O.D.S.) or both?

Again Rick I ask why do you hate America?
Norton

Social climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:26pm PT
???

so now "lying" is SO important to you Rick Wasilla?

then why did you vote FOR the LIAR Mitt Romney?

morals and "lying" is such a big deal to you, Piss Ant

go ahead, google Romney's lies during the 2012 campaign and tell us why
you voted for a a huge LIAR

then tell us why you voted for George Bush again, the second time in 2004 when
it was clear to everyone that he lied about WMD in Iraq

over 3000 American soldiers died in Iraq, because you voted for a LIAR

why do YOU keep voting for LIARS, sh!t head?
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:28pm PT
Why does he hate America?
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:42pm PT
^^^ leghumper
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:45pm PT
No you half baked half wit you crawl out from the baseboards everytime I am posting.
Your sole intent is to demonstrate the limit of your intellect and your depraved obssession with leg humping.

Your arrogance exposes your ignorance.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 28, 2015 - 05:59pm PT
Never voted for Bush Norton. Please inform us of all Romney's lies, and be specific. And by the way Norton, what is your ACA premium looking like these days? Why aren't you receiving veterans healthcare benefits anyway, did the pissant's fail to deliver as promised?

Why are you so miserable Philo?
John M

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:00pm PT
Please specify any "hate' that Philo posted.


Here you go Craig, right on the first page.

On cue with the childish sidewall busting pic.
Childish behavior from a frightened child.

Try being an adult and ignoring what you don't like.

So we should ignore gun deaths.. or cops killing blacks in disproportionate numbers?
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:02pm PT
Out of context and still free of hate. Try again.


My comments that you quoted were made to someone who was trying to disrupt the exact conversation you mentioned.
John M

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:13pm PT
Philo says …..be an adult, just ignore what you don't like..

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thiJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thiJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thiJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this

Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore this
Just ignore thisJust ignore this
Just ignore this
Just
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:23pm PT
Sorry it has to degrade to this Philo
Right wingers have to out do each other in being what they are best at

smear and lie
who can be the biggest a-hole, who can say the most inflammatory remarks possible,
it's a game, whoever say's the worst possible BS about the other side wins!!




TradHog


Trad climber

Yellow Rose of Texas

Nov 28, 2015 - 06:11pm PT
Pretty well known that Pillos real hate is reserved for the Jews. Sad. I recently read he would drive the tractor that pushes them all into a ditch. Now that is hate ya'll.

why would you make up such BS?
What the hell is wrong with you, you know Philo never said a word about jews

are you sick?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:28pm PT
On cue with the childish sidewall busting pic.
Childish behavior from a frightened child.

You call this hate??
are you serious???

that's just an reaction to the OP commentary, no lame photos
it was completely provoked by a poster that blatantly disregards all requests for civil behavior
like a 4th grade child

unbelievably pathetic as an example


now he is trying to word bomb the thread
wow? so loving and respectful
such a great way to show how right you are
thanks
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:34pm PT
If they don't like the messenger they try to kill the message.
Craig that absurd and obscene accusation was made earlier by Guyman, another knee jerking leg humper. He was called out about it. But that won't stop my anti-fan club from doing what they learned from FOX and the GOP. Lie, repeat, lie, repeat.
It says more about them and their weakness of character and limited intellect than anything else.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 06:43pm PT
Just post until we get to the next page.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
osaodina ioas diasj
pasj dpiasj dpiasj dpisaj

ja sopd
js a
podj sap
ojsap
oj apsod j
pada
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
There we go.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:46pm PT
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:47pm PT
Dinner at the asylum must be over.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 28, 2015 - 06:54pm PT
Chris will have to freeze this thread now

these people just cannot maintain a civil discussion
we can call them the brown shirts, because that's how they act
attack, pummel, post lame cartoons, post lies, smears and propaganda
and never account for anything, since of course they have no facts to back up anything they spew.

They want to shut it down.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 28, 2015 - 07:07pm PT
Alright. Page 3 and we've already got one dude rage pasting to annoy people into winning an argument and a cartoon that takes a long walk just to make a petty sexist/racist joke.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:08pm PT
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:12pm PT
How very sad.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:21pm PT
philo

climber
Nov 28, 2015 - 07:28pm PT
It must be awful being you.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:42pm PT
"It got locked for some reason. "

Ah. Got it.

Probably got 'frozen' under the terms of the policy implemented a few months ago towards any thread the devolves primarily into namecalling personal attacks.

Countdown until this one sees the same fate? The same players are already sending it in that direction....

10

9

8

7

6.....
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 28, 2015 - 09:56pm PT
namecalling personal attacks

Ah, like the true underlying theme of not only this politard thread, but of ALL politard based threads, from BOTH sides of the aisle.

Go figure.



Oh yeah, love this....

these people just cannot maintain a civil discussion

After the following posts from the same individual....

Right wingers have to out do each other in being what they are best at

smear and lie
who can be the biggest a-hole, who can say the most inflammatory remarks possible,

it's a game, whoever say's the worst possible BS about the other side wins!!

You call this hate??
are you serious???

that's just an reaction to the OP commentary, no lame photos
it was completely provoked by a poster that blatantly disregards all requests for civil behavior
like a 4th grade child

unbelievably pathetic as an example

now he is trying to word bomb the thread
wow? so loving and respectful
such a great way to show how right you are
thanks

The other side uses lies, misinformation and propaganda to demonize the other side because they don't have anything to offer.


Now what was that about ...

namecalling personal attacks




Oh the ironeeeeeeeee that abounds here.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 28, 2015 - 10:21pm PT
5...

4...

3...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 29, 2015 - 05:08am PT
apogee posted
Probably got 'frozen' under the terms of the policy implemented a few months ago towards any thread the devolves primarily into namecalling personal attacks.

I assumed the same, but the last page of that thread was perfectly decent conversation while the usual suspects were involved in a frothing at the mouth rantfest in at least 2 other threads that are still unlocked.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 06:15am PT
perfectly decent conversation

That is of course if your consider unceasing Ball Cupping between the same half dozen ideologically politard like minded individuals as a decent conversation.

But then again....
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:00am PT
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:17am PT
Hey Philo, you forgot these so unimportant factoids...

So much for "Black Lives Matter", Student Age Americans and the Poor under Obama.


More children living in poverty now than during recession...
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/07/20/more-children-living-poverty-now-than-during-recession/30415391/

That’s rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/7/obamas-rhetoric-on-fighting-poverty-doesnt-match-h/?page=all


Number of homeless students in U.S. has doubled since before the recession
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/number-of-us-homeless-students-has-doubled-since-before-the-recession/2015/09/14/0c1fadb6-58c2-11e5-8bb1-b488d231bba2_story.html



And you supposedly claim to be all bent out of shape and so worried about the Children in America, PHILO!



Shsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssh. Don't tell anyone huh, PHILO!


apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:21am PT
Maybe the title of this one is just too blatantly off the mark of ST's purpose? Or were the other two topics just as OT?

Or maybe the mods only had enough time to freeze one topic that day, and more will follow?

Who knows.

The 'usual suspects' are always going to be here until the get the whack, or they self- select out. In the meantime, there isn't much point in hand-wringing about them. Just don't engage them.
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:22am PT
Yes we were so much better off under Shrub the Alcoholic cocaine fueled deserter from the military and the Neo-Cons.
Life was just so peachy keen then.
Not like the current disaster we are barely surviving.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:33am PT
I knew you'd agree with me PHILO after the FACTS of how your POTUS were posted regarding how he has ineffectively remedied the poor conditions for the CHILDREN, STUDENTS and BLACKS of America.

Pretty disgusting isn't it, PHILO.


Yet he states we should take in Refugees. All the while the Poverty level for the Children, Students and Blacks here keeps going up and up and up.
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:35am PT
Got delusion?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:41am PT
Hey Philo, just fact checked of two of the propaganda lies on the chart you posted...


Gas prices fall below $1.87: Nov 26, 2008
http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/26/news/economy/gas_prices_sink/


Unemployment Rate at 6.8 for Men and 5.5 for Women in Nov of 2008
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_12052008.pdf



Gee, I wonder how them other numbers stack up to the actual, FACTS??? PHILO!






Norton

Social climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:45am PT
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:52am PT
Well this is a rather depressing fact. Pretty sad how the "Gov't" can manipulate the truth in order to make itself look good.



The Big Lie: 5.6% Unemployment
by Jim Clifton

Here's something that many Americans -- including some of the smartest and most educated among us -- don't know: The official unemployment rate, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, is extremely misleading.

Right now, we're hearing much celebrating from the media, the White House and Wall Street about how unemployment is "down" to 5.6%. The cheerleading for this number is deafening. The media loves a comeback story, the White House wants to score political points and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market.

None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job -- if you are so hopelessly out of work that you've stopped looking over the past four weeks -- the Department of Labor doesn't count you as unemployed. That's right. While you are as unemployed as one can possibly be, and tragically may never find work again, you are not counted in the figure we see relentlessly in the news -- currently 5.6%. Right now, as many as 30 million Americans are either out of work or severely underemployed. Trust me, the vast majority of them aren't throwing parties to toast "falling" unemployment.

There's another reason why the official rate is misleading. Say you're an out-of-work engineer or healthcare worker or construction worker or retail manager: If you perform a minimum of one hour of work in a week and are paid at least $20 -- maybe someone pays you to mow their lawn -- you're not officially counted as unemployed in the much-reported 5.6%. Few Americans know this.
http://www.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx


No wonder Mr. Obama "looks" so good. Just like he has "Contained" ISIS/ISIL etc.




philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:00am PT
Time to clear your shethead.

The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:09am PT
Just found this OTHER Factual Number PHILO!!!


U.S. Uninsured Rate at 11.6% in Third Quarter 2015
http://www.gallup.com/poll/186047/uninsured-rate-third-quarter.aspx


NOT the 9.2% YOUR propaganda picture depicts. Amazingly, the "Uninsured Rate" under this POTUS has been at a sustained level ABOVE that under the last POTUS.

WTF is up with that, PHILO!




EDIT:

And these two Facts...




philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:25am PT
side wall
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:26am PT
psycho
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:26am PT
at it
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:26am PT
again.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:28am PT
And the Poor just keep on getting poorer under MR "HOPE" Obama!!





So much for all this "Black Lives Matter" and "Poor Lives Matter" bullshet. HUH, PHILO!
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Nov 29, 2015 - 09:06am PT
looks like some good progress and healthy discourse here. you folks keep it up.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Nov 29, 2015 - 09:34am PT
Nice try with the thread idea, but this will fail, as most others have, when the PHILLO sucks all of the air out of the room.


Fixed that for you........

and by the way Phillo is a pice of dung... hates all Jews. No need to go back over all his worthless post history... it is very clear, like a alpine blue sky.
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 09:38am PT
Aw Guyman telling more lies.
How cute.
But little man you'll need a step stool to hump my leg.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:17pm PT
This is what's called an ugly vulgar personal attack
and by the way Phillo is a pice of dung... hates all Jews
guyman

see how he specifies the name of the person he is directing his hate to.
It's despicable the things these people say as personal attacks

what reasonable response does Philo have to such a degrading bigoted attack based on total lies?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:19pm PT
Keep up the good work, philo. You've got the tea party fringe all worked up.
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:31pm PT
It's
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:31pm PT
So very
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:31pm PT
Easy
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 07:33pm PT
You've got the tea party fringe all worked up.

Well it's not like they are a formidable brain trust.
philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 08:13pm PT
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Nov 29, 2015 - 09:29pm PT
Sigh..... this is all so predictable. A political thread, the Chief et al jump(s) in, all noise, frustration, bullsh#t, condemnation, evisceration, menstruation. Please just STFU and let honest discourse and conversation take place. Yeah, I know what the Chief will say and frankly I don't give a shit! since it is the same old shit! we've seen and heard before.

Seriously, Chief, you should just stop. You are not always right, as you know we aren't. But at least admit that, maybe, you don't know everything. But that would be too much of a leap of understanding and introspection, so good luck with that.

I made the pledge to myself some time ago to not respond to the chief. I still hold to that pledge, except for this post, as I know what the chief is doing; this is my last post on this thread which has, amazingly, astoundingly, turned to bullsh#t. Big surprise. Thanks chief, for shutting off civil discourse. I guess it's really about who can shout the loudest. The air has left the room.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 29, 2015 - 09:37pm PT
Stick around, winemaker. Just don't engage the hopeless.

Greasemonkey works well too, from what I hear.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 29, 2015 - 10:42pm PT
Whineymaker's true definition of "civil discourse" in a nutshell:

[Click to View YouTube Video]



Nice try with the thread idea, but this will fail, as most others have, when the PHILLO sucks all of the air out of the room.


Fixed that for you........

and by the way Phillo is a piece of dung... hates all Jews. No need to go back over all his worthless post history... it is very clear, like a alpine blue sky.

Simply put Guyman....


philo

climber
Nov 29, 2015 - 10:44pm PT
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:55am PT





Here's a little more of your fine logic.....


d-know

Trad climber
electric lady land
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:23am PT
Just duh chief,
not The.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 07:57am PT
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2015/11/colorado_springs_planned_parenthood_anti_abortion_violence.html

As news continues to unfold about Friday’s Planned Parenthood shooting in Colorado Springs, one thing is clear: Domestic terrorism remains unchecked, even on the day after Thanksgiving. To label this an isolated act of violence would be naïve. In 2015 alone, there has been unprecedented harassment from anti-choice extremists, including most recently, a series of slanderous manipulated videos used to attack Planned Parenthood’s fetal tissue donation programs. And now this.

We can speculate long and hard about the gunman’s motives or targets, but what is more significant—what keeps me up at night as an OB/GYN physician—is the concern that we as a nation have become complacent. Was it truly a shock that something so horrific emerged only weeks after anti–Planned Parenthood rhetoric dominated the presidential candidate debates? What was all of this manipulative campaigning if not an invitation to incite hate? And now this.

We agonize over external threats, overlooking the extremism, bigotry, and hatred that lives down the street.
A few people were injured and only a few people died, some headlines will say. That’s not so many compared to the recent acts of terrorism in Paris. But here’s the irony: This is a homegrown terrorist, one that no amount of passport authentication or refugee rejection could have stopped. We spend all this effort agonizing over external threats, all the while overlooking the extremism, bigotry, and hatred that lives down the street. And now this.

This is a sign of crisis. When women are too scared to seek medical care for fear of being shot on the way to clinic, we are in crisis mode. This is beyond bullying and this is no longer simply a politicizing issue. This is a runaway train on which nobody is pulling the brakes. How far does this have to play out before we can stop pretending that abortion care is not real health care? Since 1977, there have been eight murders, 17 attempted murders, 42 bombings, 186 arsons, and thousands of incidents of criminal activity associated with U.S. abortion clinics. These numbers do not include what happened in Colorado Springs.

As a physician, I worry about patients. I worry that women will be too scared or intimidated to seek the medical care they deserve and need. I also worry about the men and women who work daily to maintain access to reproductive health care: clinic staff, legislators, advocates. This is the point of terrorism, though, is it not—to incite fear and paralysis? So what then is the solution? The solution is strength and bravery in numbers, and it’s a more accurate depiction of abortion in the media. It’s also government accountability.

In 1998, after the shooting of abortion provider Barnett Slepian, the U.S. Department of Justice established a Task Force on Violence Against Health Care Providers. This is the group that coordinates national investigations of incidents like that in Colorado Springs. There are also efforts in place to prevent such tragedies from happening in the first place. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act prohibits any violent, threatening, damaging, or obstructive act that interferes with obtaining or providing abortions. These are the laws. How we choose to uphold them, however, is a different story.

Anti-choice terrorism can be stopped. When it’s recognized for what it truly is, and when preventing it is given enough support on both sides of the aisle, this can be stopped. As with many critical issues, the first step is often the most difficult—recognizing that there is a problem. We are there now, and we need legitimate, sustainable solutions before this happens again.
philo

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:07am PT
Hey Duh Chuff, one of the dead in C. Springs was a father of two small children and an Iraq War vet. Where is the outrage for one of your fallen brothers in arms?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:13am PT
The exact same place your "Outrage" is for this Mother.

Thing is, you most assuredly not only do not know who she and over 165 other Mothers this year from the same community are, BUT, you do not give a flying fk.

Cus it just doesn't go along with your obscene and totally skewed ideological agenda...



Oh yeah... and your POTUS states NOT one peep about this or the other over 379 like incidents just this year alone in the same community. Which just so happens to be the same location he worked as a.... "Community Service Organizer".
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:14am PT
Kid shoulda been packing. Dangerous hood and all.
d-know

Trad climber
electric lady land
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:18am PT
Selective outrage is
so convenient.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:21am PT
As that Vet that was tragically shot and killed should have. But unfortunately for him, this Liberal Logic was imposed on him and his peers...



Go figure...



PS: Same goes for them Uniformed MARINES that were shot dead in TN. They were NOT allowed to be armed either.

Go figure that one out as well....


Selective outrage is
so convenient.

HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:22am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 30, 2015 - 08:58am PT
I guess it's not worth debating

but someone has to say something against this asinine "talking point" of it was attacked because it was a "gun Free Zone"

All hospitals, medical centers, schools, libraries, malls, and most pubic areas are **F*#king Gun Free Zones**

Now we have to worry about Gun Free Zones???

No we don't, THEY WILL BE SHOT UP AS MUCH AS ANY GUN LEGAL ZONE.

These deranged gunman do not go to "Gun Free Zones" to shoot up people.
They go to areas that certain people are that they want to KILL.

Like Planned Parenthood,

If any of that BS was true, why do they shoot Cops?
They could get shot first!
They don't give a sh#t, they want to kill cops because they hate cops.

But go ahead and make an idiot out yourselves by trying to convince us that "Gun Free Zones" are the problem.
It's just so typical that the right wing puts out this BS, and you guys try and defend it, that's truly a symptom of cultish behavior.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 09:17am PT
In a gun free zone you know right away that the person carrying a gun is a threat. A few months ago there were people targeting police officers in public places. Those weren't gun free zones and the target was armed...didn't stop them. Arizona has open carry, concealed carry and every other kind of carry but it didn't help Gabby Giffords nor deter the I10 sniper and Arizona still ranks 16th for homicide and 14th for gun fatalities. If you apply the NRA logic that gets quoted over and over about Chicago and DC homicide rates then places like Arizona should rank among the lowest. Hawaii is lowest for gun deaths and they require registration for all weapons and issue essentially 0 concealed/open carry permits. Turns out that if you have strict gun laws and people can't just take a train to somewhere with more permissive laws you can actually lower firearm death rates.

Someone make that into an oversimplified cartoon please. Thanks.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Nov 30, 2015 - 09:20am PT
Democracy kind of sucks, in that you have to deal with the fact that the majority may not share your opinions. This happens to everyone, from time to time. How you deal with the frustration is an individual decision.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Nov 30, 2015 - 09:21am PT
I can't fathom it, but not matter what I learn something every day here on the big "S". President Vermin Supreme does have a certain ring to it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 10:21am PT
Ragetta posted
But that is just the point. Perps and nutcases, alike, simply CAN travel to various locations to purchase firearms. Legislating restriction does absolutely nothing to solve that problem. The various violent or unstable persons who commit these crimes are not persons who have any particular regard for the law.

You can keep making an anecdotal argument if it suits you, but you're leaping over the evidence to arrive at your desired conclusion. America has the most liberal gun ownership laws among developed nations and also the highest number of homicides and gun deaths. The other developed nations with low gun ownership rates due to legislation also have low gun death rates (and also homicide rates). If lower gun ownership and prohibitive laws were correlated with higher vulnerability, then all those numbers would be opposite. The evidence is that legislation actually DOES do quite a bit to solve the problem. The problem isn't that Chicago has strict gun ownership, it's that all the places around Chicago have permissive gun ownership. Likewise, if Chicago encouraged gun ownership, there's no evidence that this would actually lower homicides or crimes being that plenty of places with permissive gun laws also have high crime rates.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 30, 2015 - 10:47am PT
Hi, Ragetta!
dirtbag

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 10:51am PT
Hi, Lois!
Norton

Social climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 10:59am PT

take a hike LEB

you are toxic

your last five usernames have been deactivated by Chris and RJ

they don't want you here, can't be any clearer
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 11:00am PT
Ragetta, you're skimming over my post or something as I've already rebutted the point you keep repeating. Restating it again doesn't make it a stronger argument. And you're right, the statistics don't support a causative conclusion if you just look at Chicago. If only there were scientists who had studied gun ownership and homicide rates across developed nations...




...oh wait.

1. Where there are more guns there is more homicide (literature review).

Our review of the academic literature found that a broad array of evidence indicates that gun availability is a risk factor for homicide, both in the United States and across high-income countries. Case-control studies, ecological time-series and cross-sectional studies indicate that in homes, cities, states and regions in the US, where there are more guns, both men and women are at higher risk for homicide, particularly firearm homicide.

Hepburn, Lisa; Hemenway, David. Firearm availability and homicide: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal. 2004; 9:417-40.


2. Across high-income nations, more guns = more homicide.

We analyzed the relationship between homicide and gun availability using data from 26 developed countries from the early 1990s. We found that across developed countries, where guns are more available, there are more homicides. These results often hold even when the United States is excluded.

Hemenway, David; Miller, Matthew. Firearm availability and homicide rates across 26 high income countries. Journal of Trauma. 2000; 49:985-88.


3. Across states, more guns = more homicide

Using a validated proxy for firearm ownership, we analyzed the relationship between firearm availability and homicide across 50 states over a ten year period (1988-1997).

After controlling for poverty and urbanization, for every age group, people in states with many guns have elevated rates of homicide, particularly firearm homicide.

Miller, Matthew; Azrael, Deborah; Hemenway, David. Household firearm ownership levels and homicide rates across U.S. regions and states, 1988-1997. American Journal of Public Health. 2002: 92:1988-1993.


4. Across states, more guns = more homicide (2)

Using survey data on rates of household gun ownership, we examined the association between gun availability and homicide across states, 2001-2003. We found that states with higher levels of household gun ownership had higher rates of firearm homicide and overall homicide. This relationship held for both genders and all age groups, after accounting for rates of aggravated assault, robbery, unemployment, urbanization, alcohol consumption, and resource deprivation (e.g., poverty). There was no association between gun prevalence and non-firearm homicide.

Miller, Matthew; Azrael, Deborah; Hemenway, David. State-level homicide victimization rates in the U.S. in relation to survey measures of household firearm ownership, 2001-2003. Social Science and Medicine. 2007; 64:656-64.


They're largely from healthcare journals though and I think we both know that healthcare professionals are ill equipped to perform research and statistical analysis on data sets pertaining to causes of death and injury, right Ragetta? I mean, we can't even got those people to wash their hands!

*edit* - So what if it's LEB, guys. There's no reason to attack someone for making civil argument. It's a million times better than the political blog cut/paste that makes up 2/3 of the posts. Engage on the issues.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 11:17am PT
Again, Ragetta, the evidence does not support your argument. And the research conclusion is not "Guns are a problem in the US" it's that "places with more guns have more deaths." Other developed nations have no fewer "nut cases" (and the mentally ill are not the driving force behind our homicide rates) but they have way less guns and way less deaths. You are suggesting that if we outlawed gun ownership entirely, we would have the exact same number of homicides because anyone who wanted to violate the law would be able to do so. Who is being naive, exactly?

LEB/Louis was banned for getting too aggressive is my understanding. I was absent when she got axed, I only got to enjoy the years of thick-headedness leading up to it. She was famous for posting in a similar pattern to what you just did where I rebutted your point with new information and you kind of ignored it and just restated your point. She did a lot of trolling by playing dumb which is fine within itself but at some point it must have gotten ugly, even by Taco standards.
d-know

Trad climber
electric lady land
Nov 30, 2015 - 11:29am PT
Post a climbing pic,
xyz.
John M

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 11:33am PT
I am fairly new here so I do not really know what you have posted previously. I

Lois, if you don't want people to jump on your case, then don't lie. We know who you are. Just own it. Most of us don't care anymore if you post here. Burch made it back and is public and hasn't been banned. So just post, and stop with the nonsense. You know all the players.

Norton.. leave her be please.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 30, 2015 - 12:03pm PT
Well, Lois, looks like your cover is blown. Didja wonder how long it was going to take?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Nov 30, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
Using survey data on rates of household gun ownership, we examined the association between gun availability and homicide across states, 2001-2003. We found that states with higher levels of household gun ownership had higher rates of firearm homicide and overall homicide. This relationship held for both genders and all age groups, after accounting for rates of aggravated assault, robbery, unemployment, urbanization, alcohol consumption, and resource deprivation (e.g., poverty). There was no association between gun prevalence and non-firearm homicide.

This sort of correlation runs into a technical statistical problem of multicollinearity. The same sort of thing shows up when comparing police expenditures to murder rates. There is a strong positive correlation between police expenditures and murder rates. It would be easy to conclude (erroneously) that higher police expenditures increase murder rates. More likely, high murder rates lead the public to demand increased police protection. Unraveling that mystery requires more than merely determining correlations. One must also construct and test models of causation. In the case of police expenditures, those models show that police expenditures have no statistically significant causal relationship to murder rates, but murder rates have a statistically significant causal relationship to police expenditures.

Higher gun availability may reflect a desire of the public for increased self-protection for people from areas with high murder rates. I don't see the tests for causality in the studies HDDJ cites.

On the other hand, I also don't see tests for causality in the statistics cited by opponents of gun control, when, for example, they show places with very strict gun laws, such as Washington D.C. and Chicago, have very high firearm and total homicide rates. I think the issue is far from resolved.

I particularly discount studies from countries that don't have a Second Amendment equivalent with a correspondingly large number of illegally owned firearms. The comparisons differ too much.

I realize this lacks the sort of ad hominem attack prevalent on this page, but I thought a little variety could be useful.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
Ragetta posted
I am absolutely saying that anyone who wished to acquire a gun could do so - just like anyone who wishes to acquire pot can do so. You cannot legislate "morality." Are you aware that persons who wish to use heroin can have it delivered to their door? Black marketeers are businessmen and they fill a need.

So you're saying that I can run down to my neighborhood black market and buy a rocket launcher right now? That all illegal things are as attainable as other illegal things? Also, how do you explain the effect in the research I posted? And who said anything about legislating morality? We're talking about legislating gun ownership.

John posted
Higher gun availability may reflect a desire of the public for increased self-protection for people from areas with high murder rates. I don't see the tests for causality in the studies HDDJ cites.

On the other hand, I also don't see tests for causality in the statistics cited by opponents of gun control, when, for example, they show places with very strict gun laws, such as Washington D.C. and Chicago, have very high firearm and total homicide rates. I think the issue is far from resolved.

There are very few things that pass a "test for causality." Arguably, nothing does. There is no actual "test for causality" that HIV causes AIDS but there is so far a 100% correlation that people with AIDS test positive for HIV.

There is a very strong correlation between high rates of gun ownership (state vs state, country vs country) and high rates of death/suicide. There is no correlation between being a refugee and committing acts of violence. Why so eager to act on something with no evidence and such reluctance to act on something with evidence?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 12:33pm PT
Holy crap it IS Lois. Welcome back!

*edit*

Now about your research. Please summarize it more succinctly and we will discuss it further

If you're really too lazy to read something that's already summarized and bullet pointed I got nothing for ya, man.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Nov 30, 2015 - 12:37pm PT
There are very few things that pass a "test for causality."

That's why merely showing a correlation demonstrates less than most people contend. Without testing for causality, we can't determine "nonsense correlations" from causal ones. Showing the correlation is an important step, but it's not a sufficient one to address the arguments most purport to address.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 12:41pm PT
Most of the decisions doctors and economists made are based on correlations, many of them much weaker than what I posted. Perfect causality is only demanded by people who aren't interested in doing the things that need doing. Do you have evidence that would contradict the possible causation that I've proposed? Or that would suggest another cause? Newton's Laws of Physics are wrong. They're just right enough to get us to the Moon. I wish we could be that wrong about gun control.
philo

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 12:42pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 12:54pm PT
Got a full patient load, then?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 30, 2015 - 12:55pm PT
Good luck to you not getting the axe again, Lois!
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Nov 30, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
HDDJ, competent economists and doctors use more than mere correlation. They demand evidence of causation, not merely disproof of non-causation. Otherwise, doctors would urge the government to ban marriages, since they exhibit a strong, positive correlation with death rates over time. A good discussion of nonsense correlations and their dangers is here:

http://statpics.blogspot.com/2014/05/nonsense-correlations.html


Factcheck.org supports my point, that the issue is unsettled, by emphasizing the need to show causality:

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/12/gun-rhetoric-vs-gun-facts/

John

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Nov 30, 2015 - 01:20pm PT
John- Lots of medical decisions are made with mere correlative evidence. Lots more than that are made with no evidence at all. We are currently onramping the widespread use of a certain drug for trauma patients based on correlative evidence.

America is an experiment in gun ownership. The rest of the world is the control group. Here's how that is working out:








WOW THIS IS A TOTAL MYSTERY WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH ALL THOSE GUN DEATHS IN AMERICA WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE THE CAUSE I GUESS WE'LL NEVER KNOW
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 30, 2015 - 01:29pm PT
Grasping at straws

It's much easier to just deny good science and accept talking points produced by the NRA
Norton

Social climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 02:28pm PT
Majid_S

Mountain climber
Karkoekstan
Nov 30, 2015 - 03:11pm PT
Donald will be your daddy for 8 years and this is why:

first, he has money to buy everyone in DC.,this includes all the whores in the house and sen

Sec,he is anti-immigrant of all colors which adds extra vote from radicals to his box

third,he will start the middle east WW3

and forth, the religious followers love a man like Don

so repeat after me

Donald is my daddy






The other alternative is Clinton but you all know that no women will ever become the leader of this country so don't fool yourself

Vote for your Daddy

meanwhile

http://www.mintpressnews.com/211624-2/211624/

John M

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 03:39pm PT
I am still trying to be certain that I understand your position correctly. You want legislation which would bar all private citizens from owning any firearms? Is that a correct statement of your views?

LOL.. welcome to hell gentlemen. Everything is black and white to Lois. HDDJ says gun control and she interprets it to mean he doesn't want any private citizen to own a gun. This is the sad reality of certain kinds of people. They just can't see beyond black and white.

Lois, I gave you good advice about pretending to be someone else. Don't carry it too far. It pisses off the natives when they think someone is trying to pull one over on them.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Nov 30, 2015 - 03:48pm PT
My ST imposter instincts aren't convinced that our new poster is LEB

I think we should let him/her speak freely.
Maybe this person can give us more details about his/her life so no more confusion will continue.

But the response about Gun Control was really off the mark.

No one has said "You want legislation which would bar all private citizens from owning any firearms?"
where in the heck did that come from?

Clueless or troll

that's the either or
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Nov 30, 2015 - 03:52pm PT
Craig, it's Lois.

Trust me on this one.
dirtbag

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:02pm PT
Craig, there are a lot of unmistakable clues in her writing style, viewpoints, and ways of addressing arguments that I won't reveal here (though I could in an email, if you like).

My Lois detection radar has been wrong once, but right every other time, and I'm confident about this time.

Edit: and I say all this without any hard feelings or desire to see her banned.
philo

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:05pm PT
LEBification underway.
dirtbag

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:07pm PT
Ok, who do folks think will be the republican nominee?

I still say Rubio, just because he is most likely to be the last man standing.

Contenders: trump and cruz.

John M

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:07pm PT
Is Norton the only person who cares if she is back or not? For some reason she doesn't get under my skin as much anymore. Except perhaps the pretending. We sure use to argue though. haha..

no idea on who will be the republican nominee. I can't get those folks figured out.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:13pm PT
Rubio plays well even if he is owned by the big bucks, but Cruz has got a better ground game in place imo. Too early to tell, could be many surprises before the Feb 1 kickoff.

Why all the fear and loathing of this LEB/Lois character? What is it anyway?
John M

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 04:19pm PT
Lois/LEB is a nurse practitioner lady who drove this forum nuts a few years ago. man.. if you think about it, it was seriously funny. We were owned. There are so many threads about her. More then anyone else in the history of the forum, including Bachar. Once she started posting, the forum became about her. Burchy/PHilo and the Chief are close, but LEB is the ultimate. And she doesn't even climb.

This was a very funny post by Karl baba which hit home.

http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/497677/Loiss-Law-and-The-Loising-Point

philo

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 05:11pm PT
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Nov 30, 2015 - 05:20pm PT
*We* Don’t Make Heroes Out of Violent Psychopaths

A violent psychopath went on a shooting spree near a Planned Parenthood butcher shop over Thanksgiving weekend.

He will not become a martyr and symbol of any movement, like violent thug Michael Brown.

No one on the right will wear a T-shirt or wave a banner emblazoned with his image, like mass-murdering communist icon Che Guevara.

He will not be given a teaching position at the University of Illinois and become a celebrated community organizer like unrepentant left-wing terrorist Bill Ayers.

He will not be given a job as a correspondent for taxpayer-funded NPR, become a cause celebre among the Hollywood left, and given honorary degrees like left-wing cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal.

The Right does not make violent sociopaths into heroes.

The Left does.

You will also not see anyone on the left go out of their way to claim that he does not represent the peaceful majority of people who oppose abortion-for-convenience.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Nov 30, 2015 - 05:34pm PT
^"they're just words that have very little relationship to reality"^ -mumia

[Click to View YouTube Video]

he shot those cops, for sure. his trial was a miscarriage of justice. not that it matters to you or me or anyone but him.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:01pm PT
TGT, excellent post.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:04pm PT
Despicable. Referring to Michael Brown as a "violence thug" is typical fringe racism.
Extremist rightwing rhetoric likely helped create the environment that motivated Robert Lewis Dear.

Shame on you.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:18pm PT
He was a violent thug that perpetrated a strong arm robbery minutes before his demise.

One amusement to me, as a lonely disbeliever on the right, is noticing this about the Left: The Left imagines that their disbelief in God frees them from superstition.

In fact it does no such thing. The Left's disbelief in God does not free them from superstition -- rather, it frees the superstition to infect all other modes of their thought.

Rather than thinking in terms of the divine and magic in the area of theology and metaphysics -- which is really where thoughts about the divine and magic should be contained -- the left, being Bad at Secularism, instead permits superstition, myth, and magic to flood into all other compartments of their ship of the mind.

Rather than keeping religious thought confined to religions matters, as the openly religious do, the left, which is intensely religious but believes it is not, instead employs religious thought in all modes of thinking, particularly in politics (where The Government easily steps into the place of God as the Large, Abstract Power That Lords Above Us), but also in what they call "science."

You know, the science which personifies the Earth as a deity who seeks vengeance upon polluters and people who drive cars.

Jorroh

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:18pm PT
"Lois/LEB is a nurse practitioner lady"

Are you sure?
I always assumed LEB was a troll ring. Unfortunately they were just a little too dumb and couldn't really come up with anything other than long strings of fallacies, which got boring pretty quickly.
Norton

Social climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:24pm PT

how precious

rightwing ball cupping...
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:24pm PT
Then after the robbery he assaulted a cop in his car thru the window.

Then after that charged the cop who finally had to shoot him in self defense.

back to your mythical magical thinking,

time to pick another poster boy.
Jorroh

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:29pm PT
Was he anyones hero TGT?

He was certainly an example of the sort of summary execution of young black men that seems to be far more common than most of us ever realized.
philo

climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 06:31pm PT

time to pick another poster boy.


OK how about the little black kid minding his own business playing in the local playground when the cop drove up and murdered him in cold blood before even getting out of his car? How does that fit your bigoted narrative?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:40pm PT
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:42pm PT
^^^^ That is great. LMAO

EDIT: no contest Norton. You've already been blown out of the water jackass.
Norton

Social climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:43pm PT
Norton

Social climber
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:56pm PT




conservative action

have not heard of that one

been spending all my time at redstate.com
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 07:57pm PT
Just for YOU Crankstar, Philo AND Norton. I posted this on another stupidazz thread but it most assuredly needs to be posted here just for you looney lads.


Think about it.


[Click to View YouTube Video]
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Nov 30, 2015 - 09:24pm PT
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Nov 30, 2015 - 09:55pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 05:41am PT
Ragetta posted
I am still trying to be certain that I understand your position correctly. You want legislation which would bar all private citizens from owning any firearms? Is that a correct statement of your views?

No, I am rebutting your claim that there "is no legislative solution to this." There clearly is, we just have chosen to instead allow for tens of thousands of gun deaths/injuries instead. My point is that the idea that we are helpless to reduce gun violence (your statement) or that we do not have enough evidence (John's statement) are actually conscious decisions on our part, we just act like we are powerless to avoid taking responsibility for it. The American system is designed to have a lot of mass shootings, domestic terrorism and murder. It's not a bug, it's a feature.


John M posted
This was a very funny post by Karl baba which hit home.

I had not read that before. Karl hit a home run with that one! (though this practice of deleting all of someone's posts when they're banned is abhorrent)
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 06:18am PT
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 1, 2015 - 06:28am PT
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 1, 2015 - 06:46am PT
Goes for you, too, Edward. You a Trumpkin, too? You're planning to vote for him? Sounds like it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 07:15am PT
I don't think Al Qaeda is really a player in Iraq anymore, Ed. I think you have your memes wrong.

Trump is a huge d#@&%e and he's advocating some bad stuff but he is literally not Hitler.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:21am PT
Norton

Social climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:38am PT
is there a disconnect here?

"ISIS" IS "contained" in Iraq, where he said it was contained

stop lying, leave that to your Repub Presidential candidates


and read this

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/15/ben-rhodes/what-barack-obama-said-about-isis-being-contained/
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:41am PT
ISIS" IS "contained" in Iraq, where he said it was contained
-Norton

"ISIS IS "contained" in Iraq"

Last time I checked Raqqah was in Syria....

Not to mention where the heck Paris is....

LOL!!!!
Karen

Trad climber
Casper, Wyoming
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:41am PT
I have been out of town and have not had a chance to read the entire thread. Just want to make a comment. I was deeply disturbed by the Planned Parenthood shooting and I most certainly would consider it a domestic terrorist attack.
Rest in peace for those murdered.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:51am PT
The Mainstream Media won't call it what is;

Christian Right Wing Extremist Terrorism
They are anti Government, anti progress, and consider abortion to murder, so it's Ok to murder the murderers

and they all have stock piles of Guns

They have killed ~7 times more Americans that Islamic Extremists


Why does the GOP refuse to call it what it is?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 07:51am PT
Norton

Social climber

Dec 1, 2015 - 07:38am PT
is there a disconnect here?

"ISIS" IS "contained" in Iraq, where he said it was contained

stop lying, leave that to your Repub Presidential candidates


and read this

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/15/ben-rhodes/what-barack-obama-said-about-isis-being-contained/

AND THIS ONE...

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Dec 1, 2015 - 07:51am PT
The Mainstream Media won't call it what is;

Christian Right Wing Extremist Terrorism
They are anti Government, anti progress, and consider abortion to murder, so it's Ok to murder the murderers

and they all have stock piles of Guns

They have killed ~7 times more Americans that Islamic Extremists


Ah FRY, that would equate to over 21,000 people. You do have a viable reference for such a statement of course, right FRY???





Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:06am PT
Yes, the stupid people should do the research before they make themselves look like the idiots they prove to be with every post.


You Are More Than 7 Times As Likely To Be Killed By A Right-Wing Extremist Than By Muslim Terrorists

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/11/30/3725562/you-are-more-than-7-times-as-likely-to-be-killed-by-a-right-wing-extemist-than-by-muslim-terrorists/


Why did Bush allow 9/11 to happen on his watch?
it's almost if he wanted it to happen so he could impose his right wing extremist agenda = read PNAC
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:08am PT
Another attempt at a US politics megathread. The goal is civil (if contentious) political discussion. Most of your political cartoons are bad. Use your words.

Ur an idiot for not listening to CMAC.. get a life HIdesertDIPshit!

HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:08am PT
You Are More Than 7 Times As Likely To Be Killed By A Right-Wing Extremist Than By Muslim Terrorists
-Dr. F


Only if you don't count 9/11

LOL!!!
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:10am PT
Bernie said that he equated the rise of ISIS with global warming.
I guess he's been going to the same crack house as Prince Charles.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:13am PT


I didn't realize that you Left Wing Radical Democrats, which of course started the group you refer to above and were in control of that org in it's murdering hey day between 1867-1870's, did so for...

Religious purposes.


Cus you all for the most part are, NON-CHRISTIAN, correct CRAIG FRY?

How about this fact CRAIG FRY!

The first Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee, by six former members of the Confederate army.[17] The name is probably derived from the Greek word kuklos (κύκλος) which means circle.[18]

In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were political, but political in the broadest sense, for it sought to affect power relations, both public and private, throughout Southern society. It aimed to reverse the interlocking changes sweeping over the South during Reconstruction: to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life.

Although there was little organizational structure above the local level, similar groups rose across the South and adopted the same name and methods.[19] Klan groups spread throughout the South as an insurgent movement during the Reconstruction era in the United States. As a secret vigilante group, the Klan targeted freedmen and their allies; it sought to restore white supremacy by threats and violence, including murder, against black and white Republicans. In 1870 and 1871, the federal government passed the Force Acts, which were used to prosecute Klan crimes.[20] Prosecution of Klan crimes and enforcement of the Force Acts suppressed Klan activity.

The first Klan had mixed results in terms of achieving its objectives. It seriously weakened the black political establishment through its use of assassinations and threats of violence; it drove some people out of politics. On the other hand, it caused a sharp backlash, with passage of federal laws that historian Eric Foner says were a success in terms of "restoring order, reinvigorating the morale of Southern Republicans, and enabling blacks to exercise their rights as citizens."[21] Historian George C. Rable argues that the Klan was a political failure and therefore was discarded by the Democratic leaders of the South. He says:

the Klan declined in strength in part because of internal weaknesses; its lack of central organization and the failure of its leaders to control criminal elements and sadists. More fundamentally, it declined because it failed to achieve its central objective – the overthrow of Republican state governments in the South.


Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:15am PT
Bernie was right, but no one expects you guys to be able to do the critical thinking it takes to see it's 100% correct

so just give it up
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:16am PT
Well, while the Earth has been warming I've gotten older. Hmmmmm...
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:17am PT
They were Right Wing Radical Terrorists that were also right wing Democrats

There is zero evidence of a single left wing person in the Klu Klux Klan
every single on of them were Right Wing Christians

But don't let the facts bother your hate speech posting

That's the f-ing definition of a left wing liberal, inclusive to all races, minorities and sexual preferences

as opposed to a right winger which is the opposite
Hilter, Trump, KKK, etc are perfect examples of right wing racism.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:22am PT
Hey, I've had a brain storm! You don't suppose that the rise of ISIS has anything to do with
the fact that 500 million people, who believe that they'll get unlimited pussy in heaven if they
die stoopidly, also live in an essentially uninhabitable part of the world, do you? And, of course,
it was never abominably hot there before.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:23am PT
Yes, until the 30s the democrats were largely a southern, Conservative party, hostile to civil rights. By the 70 and 80s these same democrats jumped parties, largely as a result of the dems' new support of civil rights. The parties basically flipped, and now the republicans are the southern conservative party.

This is basic US history. I haven't seen any liberal/democrat here deny that the party had advocated abhorrent views for most of its existence.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:23am PT
Gee CRAIG FRY, sounds like the insistent politard bullshet rhetoric you keep posting here...


Klan violence worked to suppress black voting, and campaign seasons were deadly. More than 2,000 persons were killed, wounded and otherwise injured in Louisiana within a few weeks prior to the Presidential election of November 1868. Although St. Landry Parish had a registered Republican majority of 1,071, after the murders, no Republicans voted in the fall elections. White Democrats cast the full vote of the parish for President Grant's opponent. The KKK killed and wounded more than 200 black Republicans, hunting and chasing them through the woods. Thirteen captives were taken from jail and shot; a half-buried pile of 25 bodies was found in the woods. The KKK made people vote Democratic and gave them certificates of the fact.


Some things just NEVER change, do they CRAIG FRY!!!



Hey Reilly, it was the rising "heat" that created ISIS. Prior to 1880 or so, there were glaciers all over that region. Kept things ... COOL!


crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:25am PT
"Was it "I can't stand Donald Trump. He's a callous rube. He's unqualified to be POTUS"?

I stand corrected Edward. So, if he's the nominee you're voting for the Democrat, correct?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:26am PT
The farms all dried up, the masses left the rural areas and went to the cities, the despotic rulers cut off the social services to the new masses, the people rebelled to save their (current) lives.
A civil war insued.

And since the power structure was devastated by the Bush debacle, ISIS gained strength
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:27am PT
What's your final solution for those right wingers Craig?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 08:29am PT
Reilly posted
Bernie said that he equated the rise of ISIS with global warming.
I guess he's been going to the same crack house as Prince Charles.

I don't know enough of what he was basing this on to scoff or not but climate change and population growth is predicted to have significant effects on conflict as resources change and create instability.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/16/bernie-s/fact-checking-bernie-sanders-comments-climate-chan/
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:29am PT
And since the power structure was devastated by the Bush debacle, ISIS gained strength


BUT BUT BUT.....




Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:31am PT
Some things just NEVER change, do they CRAIG FRY!!!
Yes, you demonstrate your inability to think in every post.

didn't I ask you nicely to not use my name in your posts?
Why do you insist on being such an a-hole?
does it make you feel good to PISS people off??

Try being a normal nice person for once, instead of looking for every a-hole action possible
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:32am PT
HDDJ:
Hey, I've had a brain storm! You don't suppose that the rise of ISIS has anything to do with
the fact that 500 million people, who believe that they'll get unlimited pussy in heaven if they
die stoopidly, also live in an essentially uninhabitable part of the world, do you? And, of course,
it was never abominably hot there before.



The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:34am PT



That is your "Avatar" is it not, Craig Fry??
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:35am PT
So now more Personal attacks

are you just retarded??

Why?
Why do you have to show such juvenile behavior, we were trying to debate something here

You win, you are the King of Personal attacks
Now stop
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:37am PT
I suppose it's bad for now to address one per their ... Avatar. HUH, Craig Fry?





Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Dec 1, 2015 - 08:35am PT
So now more Personal attacks

are you just retarded??

Why?
Why do you have to show such juvenile behavior, we were trying to debate something here

You win, you are the King of Personal attacks
Now stop



Priceless. RFLMAO!


EDIT:

You of course C-FRY must be referring to Philo, Crankstar, Norton and a slew of others here. Correct?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 08:40am PT
Reilly posted
Hey, I've had a brain storm! You don't suppose that the rise of ISIS has anything to do with
the fact that 500 million people, who believe that they'll get unlimited pussy in heaven if they
die stoopidly, also live in an essentially uninhabitable part of the world, do you? And, of course,
it was never abominably hot there before.

Maybe next time you have a brainstorm consider that most of the expertise and information you require does not currently reside inside your brain? Read the link I posted. It explains what I was describing pretty well. It also rated Bernie's statement as "mostly false" which sounds about right to me.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:41am PT

Bernie said that he equated the rise of ISIS with global warming.
I guess he's been going to the same crack house as Prince Charles.

Bernie just had surgery for a hernia. His days are likely numbered.

I find it ironic that Obama, who has been flying all over the world of late and increasing his carbon footprint, is at a climate change convention.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:44am PT
HDDJ, you need to read some Thomas Malthus and break out a book on economic geography.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:45am PT
What's ironic about it?

You expect them to get things done by skype or email?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:45am PT
I find it ironic that Obama, who has been flying all over the world of late and increasing his carbon footprint, is at a climate change convention.

Let's NOT forget the other supposed save the world from CC fanatics from around the globe whose PVT Jet Planes line the Tarmac at.... Charles de Gaulle Airport.

Norton

Social climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:46am PT
*US Special Forces Commander Says Bush Created ISIS


The fact that Bush created ISIS isn’t all, either. President Bush also released the future leader of ISIS claiming that he was “harmless.” Mission accomplished,

That’s right, the former commander of U.S. Special Forces under President George W. Bush put the nail in the coffin once and for all about who is responsible for the rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, and guess what, conservatives? It’s NOT President Obama.

Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is now retired, so he has no problem setting history straight. During an interview with German newspaper Der Spiegel, Flynn admitted that the Bush administration was “too dumb” to realize they had captured Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. So they released him because they didn’t deem him a threat. Now, the guy is the top commander of the terrorist group known as ISIS. Here is a bit of the transcript of that interview:

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/12/01/former-u-s-special-forces-commander-confirms-bush-invasion-of-iraq-created-isis/
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:48am PT
Nice to see you boys are so hard at work this morning. Push on through the day.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 08:52am PT
Reilly posted
HDDJ, you need to read some Thomas Malthus

Reilly, you're so eager to have a response that you don't appear to even know what you're arguing about.


Norton- Aren't you being as facile about this as Reilly is? Isn't this a little more complicated than "President X created ISIL?" It seems to me that the American people elected both those presidents and we are even more eager than our politicians to make sure someone else is to blame.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:55am PT
In fact, climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism,"
Bernie Sanders

No where did he say ISIS
so why are you saying he said GCC created ISIS

Isn't this just another smear campaign

Take something out of context, call him lying or stupid

What about denying GCC altogether?
Isn't that lie more important than someone flew somewhere to a meeting
What a pathetic double standard



climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism, true
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:56am PT
Hey NORTON,


You mean this dude???


Report
Out of Uniform and Into the Political Fray

Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn retired and immediately began bashing the administration. Has he crossed a line?




Out of Uniform and Into the Political Fray

The witness at the June 10 House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing was tossing the equivalent of red meat to his Republican questioners, who were practically slavering in gratitude.

President Barack Obama’s plan to impose “snapback sanctions” should Iran violate a nuclear deal? “Wishful thinking.”

The awkwardness of having U.S. trainers and Iranian forces both in Iraq helping to counter a common enemy? “We have allowed this thing to get so out of kilter.”

The president’s June 8 remark that “we don’t yet have a complete strategy” for training Iraqi forces to combat the Islamic State? “I was stunned by his comments,” the witness said. “Stunned.”

But the wiry, sharp-featured man giving the representatives what they wanted and then some was no pundit from a right-leaning think tank, nor was he an alumnus of former President George W. Bush’s administration. No, the man in the gray suit sounding the alarm over the current administration’s approach to the Middle East was none other than Obama’s most recent director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

Since taking off his uniform last August, Flynn, 56, has been in the vanguard of those criticizing the president’s policies in the Middle East, speaking out at venues ranging from congressional hearings and trade association banquets to appearances on Fox News, CNN, Sky News Arabia, and Japanese television, targeting the Iranian nuclear deal, the weakness of the U.S. response to the Islamic State, and the Obama administration’s refusal to call America’s enemies in the Middle East “Islamic militants.” Flynn is hardly the first retired senior officer to criticize a sitting president’s policies, but in the post-9/11 era, no one else has combined Flynn’s rank and high-profile position at retirement, and the speed — once out of uniform — with which he began lambasting the policies of the administration he had just been serving.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 1, 2015 - 08:56am PT
Yes, it is, and it's a lot more complicated than 'President X is a hypocrite about climate change because he flew to a meeting about it'.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:03am PT

Yes, it is, and it's a lot more complicated than 'President X is a hypocrite about climate change because he flew to a meeting about it'.

You're probably right.

But, if you add in all the vacation and golf travel it becomes abundantly clear...
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:04am PT

What's ironic about it?

You expect them to get things done by skype or email?

Yup.

Ever hear of a teleconference?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 09:06am PT
I have to say the whole "you drove a car to the environmental meeting so you're a hypocrite and can't be trusted" argument is painfully hollow. If a hippie who lived in a yurt and rode his bike everywhere preaches carbon reduction we ridicule him too. Last time I checked there were 15 Republican Candidates flying all over the country despite the fact that only 3 or 4 of them have any distant hope of actually being elected. Are you going to bring up their carbon emissions at their next campaign stop? Unlikely.


10b posted
Yup.

Ever hear of a teleconference?

Do you have any clue how much teleconferencing happened to prepare for this meeting? Do you think a President flies anywhere until 80-90% of the work is already hammered out?
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:08am PT
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:11am PT
Craig the answer about your question regarding Le Chuff is that he is a duplicitous twit. He is sp terrified of what he can't control that he reacts like a child waking from a bad nightmare.
He is so desperate to not hear anything but the voices in his head that he attacks anything that doesn't conform to his narrow minded and bigoted view of the world. Just look at anything he responds to or posts. Clearly he is afraid of change and challenge and does what ever disruptive act he can to stiffle adult discussion. Like taking a shit! in the swimming pool so everyone else with leave him to wallow and bathe in his own fetid stink. He is the SuperTopo Donald, the tRUMP of the Taco. The more people call him on his lies and personal attacks the louder and ruder he gets. This is the down side of US military training, some get lost and never make it back.

Just wait though. Ignoring his own vile putrifications he will comaback and conflate and equate my calling him a twit with his own behavior. Then he will retell one of his bald faced whoppers thinking that people will believe im this time. Deny, deflect, delete.



Just like Hermit master, the MensaMan himself, just did the tbaggers rebarf a lie that has been shown false but convenient to spew. You can show them the records of how much less "vacation" time Obama has taken compared to his predecessors but it won't matter.
They fixate on the golf thing because it's been told to them so often.


10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:13am PT
Last time I checked there were 15 Republican Candidates flying all over the country despite the fact that only 3 or 4 of them have any distant hope of actually being elected. Are you going to bring up their carbon emissions at their next campaign stop? Unlikely.

What does that have to do with anything? I am not talking about the loser republican candidates, I am talking about obamas hypocrisy.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:15am PT
Last time I checked there were 15 Republican Candidates flying all over the country despite the fact that only 3 or 4 of them have any distant hope of actually being elected. Are you going to bring up their carbon emissions at their next campaign stop? Unlikely.

Which ones are talking about reducing carbon emissions to combat climate change?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 09:19am PT
10b posted
What does that have to do with anything? I am not talking about the loser republican candidates, I am talking about obamas hypocrisy.

So when a dozen people (who actively argue that carbon isn't an issue) fly all around the country for a year tilting at windmills it's fine but when one person who actually has the power to influence global change flies to Europe once it's hypocrisy?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:19am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Dec 1, 2015 - 08:35am PT
So now more Personal attacks

are you just retarded??

Why?
Why do you have to show such juvenile behavior, we were trying to debate something here

You win, you are the King of Personal attacks
Now stop



THEN.....



philo

climber

Dec 1, 2015 - 09:11am PT
Craig the answer about your question regarding Le Chuff is that he is a duplicitous twit. He is sp terrified of what he can't control that he reacts like a child waking from a bad nightmare.
He is so desperate to not hear anything but the voices in his head that he attacks anything that doesn't conform to his narrow minded and bigoted view of the world. Just look at anything he responds to or posts. Clearly he is afraid of change and challenge and does what ever disruptive act he can to stiffle adult discussion. Like taking a shit! in the swimming pool so everyone else with leave him to wallow and bathe in his own fetid stink. He is the SuperTopo Donald, the tRUMP of the Taco. The more people call him on his lies and personal attacks the louder and ruder he gets. This is the down side of US military training, some get lost and never make it back.

Just wait though. Ignoring his own vile putrifications he will comaback and conflate and equate my calling him a twit with his own behavior. Then he will retell one of his bald faced whoppers thinking that people will believe im this time. Deny, deflect, delete.


Right on cue.

Thanks again Philo for reaffirming my post...

You of course C-FRY must be referring to Philo, Crankstar, Norton and a slew of others here. Correct?


Of course you can always blame this behavior you speak of C-Fry by your compatriots, on ... Climate Change. And don't forget, BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:24am PT
You've got to be kidding. What hypocricy?

10b you have been so dissappointing lately.
Surely you are learned enough not to call out the head of state for attending a world conferrence as a waste of energy and a carbon footprint issue. He is the PRESIDENT of the UNITED STAES of NORTH AMERICA after all. If the conferrence were about peace negotiation would you expect the POTUS to tell the troops to stop shooting til he's back. And to brush off jet setting GOP canidates travels as outside the purview of your spurious comment/question is really hypocritical.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:40am PT
but when one person who actually has the power to influence global change


Wow you now think Obama is equal to GOD.

I spit coffee all over the monitor when I came across that little gem stone.

TGT .... that was some good posting upthread.

10b.... Phillo is calling you out. Remember its best to not stray to far from the group think of these lefties. They can become really viscous and hateful if YOU don't agree 100%

Peace and love to all.

carry on
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:46am PT
Hey Lyin guyman how are you this fine morning?
Isn't calling people's points of view into question, particularly when when they are specious, spurious and supercilious, a standard part of debate? There was no personal attack was there? There is no gang of lefties cabaling around ST. Unlike the rightwing fanboiz, we all think for ourselves and come to our own conclusions. We each as individuals defend our positions precisely because we have done our own rigorous assessments of facts not in spite of them. Unlike the obvious circlejerk with the Koch problem.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:57am PT
These United Nations Climate Change Conferences are just so much posturing. Every year, there's a bunch hooplah about a global pact being made to combat global warming. And every year, we're told important groundwork was laid to help make a future deal possible. Every year.

Maybe, this year is "the year".

Maybe not.

philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:06am PT
But this year we don't have an oilman to scuttle the Kyoto Accords.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:10am PT
hey who you calling viscous guyman, ya sumbitch !?


;-)
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:18am PT
"one person who actually has the power to influence global change"


"Wow you now think Obama is equal to GOD."

What a childish response.
The President can certainly influence global change.
Or in the case of Bush resist it.


Would you have been happier if we had sent Joe the Plumber?
Who would you have suggested sending to Yalta?
carry on
philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:22am PT
The Oil Tar Sands.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:27am PT
Oilman?

I thought the Senate crushed it 95-0.

With gas back at 2004 prices, I doubt the masses are going to be too interested in costly alternatives.

Better to just keep the head in the sand, huh, Edward?

Nah. I'm just not buying the annual dog and pony show.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:55am PT
President Bush Signed the Iraq Withdrawal Order

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_of_U.S._troops_from_Iraq
Norton

Social climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 10:57am PT
President Bush Created ISIS

Former Military Chief: Iraq War Was A 'Failure' That Helped Create ISIS
"We strategically marched in the wrong direction."

Retired Lt. General Michael Flynn, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency who came up through intelligence positions in Iraq and Afghanistan, says that the George W. Bush administration's Iraq war was a tremendous blunder that helped to create the self-proclaimed Islamic State, or ISIS.

"It was a huge error," Flynn said about the Iraq war in a detailed interview with German newspaper Der Spiegel published Sunday.


JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 11:06am PT
HDDJ,

I appreciate your efforts and those of several others to keep this thread as a debate over ideas rather than an insult exchange. Unfortunately, it appears we failed. The signal-to-noise ratio is getting too high, even for me, to find it worthwhile to get the gold from the dross.

John
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 11:31am PT
Even if they reach an agreement in Paris, it's non binding.

have a good day philo. sorry to hear about your dog.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 1, 2015 - 11:57am PT
guyman posted
Wow you now think Obama is equal to GOD.

I spit coffee all over the monitor when I came across that little gem stone.

That's an interesting reaction. So your position is that the President of the United States, leader of the world's largest consumer and second largest polluter, does not have the power to influence global debate/action on this issue? Please, do go on.


John- I appreciate your efforts too, and I agree with Not-Lois!


10b posted
Even if they reach an agreement in Paris, it's non binding.

guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 1, 2015 - 02:45pm PT
That's an interesting reaction. So your position is that the President of the United States, leader of the world's largest consumer and second largest polluter, does not have the power to influence global debate/action on this issue? Please, do go on.


He has zero power to make a TREATY and APPROVE it.... oh yea he will sell out the USA and call it a TREATY but he must bring it before Congress and it must be approved. The Congress is starting to not do what this PREZ wishes, if you haven't been paying attention to the latest action in DC.

And this is a UN deal, again, the UN is so League of Nations now don't you think?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 03:30pm PT
There are a million things that the President can do to reduce green house emissions that do not involve a UN treaty.
So I guess your whole premise was wrong.

And who thinks Obama is God? no one
wrong again

Do you think that Congress should block the UN Treaty?

China is serious about doing something, and since they don't have a obstructive congress bought off by big Oil, they can do what's best for their country.

Doing something about reducing green house emissions is selling out the USA?
wrong again

he could create millions of green jobs tomorrow with the OK from Congress
why does the GOP want to keep people from getting green jobs?

philo

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 03:49pm PT
Starting?
Unbelievable!


The Congress is starting to not do what this PREZ wishes, if you haven't been paying attention to the latest action in DC.

Have you been in a coma for the last seven years or are you always in blind denial of reality?
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 03:56pm PT
If only we could summon up another big krakatoa eruption, like the one in 1883 that caused 4 years without summer. THAT would fix this climate thingy.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:04pm PT
It actually is interesting you mention that. THere is one theory where when the bulk of the ice over Greenland melts causes a major shift in the ocean currents of the Atlantic, if I remember correct the deep currents in particular, causing the next period of glacial advance. But this is from so long ago (1980's), I forget who came up with this theory of glacial cycles.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:11pm PT
I think the bottom line is IF the glacial periods are (still) cyclical. Cycles tend to end.
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:14pm PT
I read somewhere that the earth is headed toward another inevitable ice age (seems they are cyclical) and, if global warming did anything at all, it might minimally delay the onset.

We are in an ice age now. It started about the time that the continent of Antarctica moved into its current position, and when the north pole became nearly land-locked by the continents North America and Eurasia.

Ice Ages are characterized by alternating periods of glaciations and interglacial periods. The last glaciation ended about 20,000 years ago. So we are currently in an Ice Age but in an interglacial period of that Ice Age.

Historically, interglacial periods are about 5,000 to 10,000 years in length. So our current 20,000-year interglacial is an anomaly.

I noticed evidence of climate warming back in the 1990s when I was doing cave research, but at the time did not recognize the significance of what I was seeing. I suspect that out current interglacial will continue and the next glaciation will, in fact, be delayed even more by global warming.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:18pm PT
Ragetta
What do you think of Hillary Clinton?
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:20pm PT
This is really semantics I suspect, but the last glacial period ended approximately 12,000 years ago. This roughly correlates with the beginning of the Holocene period some 11,500 years ago.

edit; So the last 11,500 or so years has been an interglacial.


My point is if we (humans) have altered the system enough, we may be outside of the glacial cycle. Period. Purely conjecture of course.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:25pm PT
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago


A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation
By Shannon Hall | October 26, 2015 |

The company’s knowledge of climate change dates back to July 1977, when its senior scientist James Black delivered a sobering message on the topic.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

Exxon was aware of climate change, as early as 1977, 11 years before it became a public issue, according to a recent investigation from InsideClimate News. This knowledge did not prevent the company (now ExxonMobil and the world’s largest oil and gas company) from spending decades refusing to publicly acknowledge climate change and even promoting climate misinformation—an approach many have likened to the lies spread by the tobacco industry regarding the health risks of smoking. Both industries were conscious that their products wouldn’t stay profitable once the world understood the risks, so much so that they used the same consultants to develop strategies on how to communicate with the public.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:37pm PT
I also think this country is not ready for ANY female to be elected president.

I couldn't disagree more. While Hillary Clinton isn't exactly my first choice, I would vote for her over Trump.

More importantly, I think there are any number of women capable of running a convincing campaign for their party's nomination. On the Republican side, we already have NiKki Haley, a governor who has demonstrated an ability both to govern and to lead. She would be an excellent candidate for the conservative cause. On the Democratic side, in addition to Hillary, someone like Patty Murray who could articulate the liberal position quite well.

Thus far, only Carly Fiorina and Hillary Clinton have chosen to run. In my opinion, Fiorina has not demonstrated the qualifications to be President, mainly because she has never (to my knowledge) served in elective office. Still, if any of a number of strong female candidates chose to run, I think you'd find the country more than ready to elect her.

John
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:42pm PT
I read it recently in an email...

Say no more.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:48pm PT
We need to all go have a smoke.....and chill.

This MEGATHREAD is spinning out of control....

maybe that was the original intention.

see youall later... must work, the boss man is calling.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 04:49pm PT
Ragetta
what does your avatar name reference?
just curious
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:04pm PT
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago

Thanks for putting that up link Craig. But believe it or not, they were not the only ones to know about this, at least in the 1980's. Studying Quaternary geology, this was one of the topics of interest. Quaternary geology is essentially study of glacial and interglacial periods. I wouldn't say human caused climate change was widely discussed, but a fair number of people had an inkling during this period. The interesting point to me is how it went from an interesting point of discussion to where it is today. Also, Exxon and San Diego State used to have a pretty close realtionship in the '80's.

edit; it's been decades since I really studied this stuff.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:13pm PT
It is an anagram of my name.

Age Tart?
Gate Rat?
Teat Rag?
A Target?
dirtbag

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:17pm PT
No, of "Lois."

She's having a bad spell day.
Jorroh

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:22pm PT
"Lois/LEB is a nurse practitioner lady"

I asked it earlier but no-one replied... was LEB really real?

I always assumed LEB was a troll ring... Unfortunately they were just a little too dumb and couldn't really come up with anything other than long strings of fallacies, which got boring pretty quickly.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:23pm PT
Really really real.

For reals!
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:29pm PT
was LEB really real?

She was/is for real.

She would post her opinions (which were long) and the entire forum would go batshit crazy.

They even got to the point where many on this forum would post pictures of her with penis' attached to her head.

Some of the most sickening and disgusting conduct from the very people who should have known better.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 1, 2015 - 05:45pm PT
I say Ragetta is probably not LEB
but I can still change my mind
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:27pm PT
Craig, you had the same denial last time Lois came back under a new avatar. What's the deal?

I'm telling you....trust me. It's Lois.
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:34pm PT
It's possible that Ragetta is not Lois, but is someone else pretending to be Lois-pretending-not-to-be-Lois.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 1, 2015 - 09:35pm PT
Ah, yes...DMT returns!

I'd accept that...except since DMT = Lois & Lois = DMT, it doesn't really change anything, does it?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 05:23am PT
John posted
Thus far, only Carly Fiorina and Hillary Clinton have chosen to run. In my opinion, Fiorina has not demonstrated the qualifications to be President, mainly because she has never (to my knowledge) served in elective office.

I appreciated your otherwise sober evaluation of the presidential candidates but I have to ask, is her lack of experience in elected office really the only thing making you balk at considering Fiorina qualified?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 06:11am PT
Republican Primary Update:

Despite positive views of Carson's debate performance and efforts last month by MSM to paint a "Carson ascendant" story (which unsurprisingly turned into a "Carson is a liar" story), Trump remains well ahead of the rest of the pack. Rubio appears to be slowly trending up, but still polling well short of even Carson. Trump leads in both Iowa (by a small amount) and in New Hampshire (by double digits). Everyone agrees that polls taken long before the election are almost entirely for MSM entertainment purposes only, but it's now December and the first ballots will be cast in about 2 months.

So what gives? Are most Americans still waiting until after the holidays to make up their minds? Is the non-Trump vote going to coalesce behind Rubio or Bush once push comes to shove? Or is the narrative shifting and Trump is really worth considering as a serious primary contender?
John Duffield

Mountain climber
New York
Dec 2, 2015 - 06:28am PT
Trump, is articulating thoughts that simmer below the surface in many in the electorate. While I continue to believe, that a Trump Presidency would be a huge disaster for the US, the failure of the people in charge now, to simply shoot the messenger rather than addressing the issues, continues to bump up his numbers. One way or another, 2016, will be a watershed year and the existing political models, will need serious recalibration.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 2, 2015 - 06:32am PT
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 2, 2015 - 06:34am PT
Trump, is articulating

Any sentence beginning this way has to be satirical.


Sorry, John, we do not need to address his issues. When this loathsome creep is finally gone we need to disinfect the country to get rid of the stench his presence has left.
philo

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 06:37am PT
The LEB canoe is off to the regatta with out a paddle.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 06:53am PT

Dec 1, 2015 - 09:34pm PT
It's possible that Ragetta is not Lois, but is someone else pretending to be Lois-pretending-not-to-be-Lois.

Let me guess: "Victor Victoria" is playing on Netflix?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 07:10am PT
John D posted
Trump, is articulating thoughts that simmer below the surface in many in the electorate. While I continue to believe, that a Trump Presidency would be a huge disaster for the US, the failure of the people in charge now, to simply shoot the messenger rather than addressing the issues, continues to bump up his numbers.

Do you think they aren't addressing the issues or that Trump is creating his own? For instance, was Obama's constitutional eligibility to become President not addressed properly or was it simply a straw man issue leveraged to gain political advantage? Net illegal immigration is actually in the negatives right now (more people are leaving than coming). America has the strongest military by any measurable amount but to hear Trump and Fiorina talk the military is crippled.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 07:17am PT
"So what gives? Are most Americans still waiting until after the holidays to make up their minds?"

Nah, it's pretty simple: America is still enjoying the TV show that is Trump. They'll get tired of the show at some point...when it becomes too repetitive...then look for a new show.

Or even more likely: in the primary process, voters date a lot of candidates before they choose seriously who they will marry. Like relationships, that's going to involve some unfortunate dating decisions that they later regret, then finding yourself well down the dating road, and making a tough (read: less-than-ideal) decision from the remaining prospects.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 07:19am PT
That's been the conventional wisdom for a while now but it's beginning to show signs of not playing out that way.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 07:30am PT
We'll see. Trump still hasn't jumped the shark- there's still plenty of time for that.

(Edit) Best-case scenario, though: he actually gets the nod. That'll make Hillary a shoo-in.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 07:31am PT
The real Lois would have gone off on Hillary.
She hated her with a passion.
That was the LEB test.

Our new poster seems to have his/her passion well contained

I had no denial before, maybe once when I wasn't around much,
I was the one that busted her twice before
and made her admit the truth


I never think what Trumps says, not even a simmer.
His fascist, racist, egomaniacal talk is revolting to me.
He's nothing more than a billionaire snake oil salesman.

If you really listen to him, all he really talks about is himself and how great he is, he's the smartest, he's got the best memory, he's the bigglyist (he used that word), the best negotiator, blah blah blah

He says nothing worth listening to.

My prediction, once again....
He will not be the GOP nominee.


Chris Christy may be the come back kid
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:07am PT
We need to all go have a smoke.....and chill.

This MEGATHREAD is spinning out of control....

maybe that was the original intention.

see youall later... must work, the boss man is calling.

have fun at work Guyman.. The pensioners (philo) is out to get you.. :)
philo

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:31am PT
Funny that the very guyman who slings slanderous lies of the most despicable kind now wants to everyone chill.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 08:39am PT
Philo- best thing is to just post content. Someone has to turn the cheek. Take the opportunity.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:40am PT
^^^
+1
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:42am PT
China is serious about doing something, and since they don't have a obstructive congress bought off by big Oil, they can do what's best for their country

Boy howdy.

India is serious, too.


More than 2,400 coal-fired power stations are under construction or being planned around the world.

New plants will emit 6.5 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide per year.

China is building 368 plants and planning another 803.

India is building 297 and planning 149.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/environment/article4629455.ece
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:45am PT
Dude. You're blowin' out the sidewalls.

Scale it down, buddy. That shit's annoying.
philo

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:52am PT
Apogee it's annoying on purpose. Typical wrongwingnut tactic.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 09:01am PT
Actually, I think Sketch just has a problem with uploading images.

Gotta work on that, buddy.

Edit: You can do it in any image editing software program. 600 pixel wide seems to be pretty workable.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 09:18am PT
Wow. Making more sh*t up and and saying Dem's are more likely to be violent criminals. Can you smell the desperation?

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ted-cruz%e2%80%99s-four-pinocchio-claim-that-%e2%80%98the-overwhelming-majority-of-violent-criminals-are-democrats%e2%80%99/ar-AAfVijQ?li=BBnb7Kz
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 09:29am PT
Just use the F-ing Photo tool that ST gives you on the Reply box
Boy, that was hard
some people

I read somewhere that China is phasing out many coal plants
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 2, 2015 - 09:58am PT
Good morning.....

I read somewhere that China is phasing out many coal plants


CF, do you have a source?????????????????? I don't believe you at all... :>)


And Phillo.... I don't think I lied one bit.

I just wish to say this: Hillerry is a liar, and a bad Human Being ... to many sources to point at.

If you folks think she is "qualified".... you should think again.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 10:52am PT
You guys are pathetic

I just put the exact words "China is phasing out many coal plants" into the Google Machine

and it gives me an answer!!!
I guess not every one is smart as me
I must be the smartest Person in the World!

Beijing to Shut All Major Coal Power Plants to Cut Pollution
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-24/beijing-to-close-all-major-coal-power-plants-to-curb-pollution


They run a smear campaign about Hillary lying

They admit it was all political

And then we wonder why every Right Wingers think Hillary is Liar

But of course they don't care iota about the constant lying about everything that the GOP does, even the lies they make about Hillary
They think it's the truth, because their is no right wing smear campaign to tell them what to think

Pathetic dupes
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 10:59am PT
Significantly, China is replacing the four coal plants with larger plants fired by natural gas. I'm not convinced, however, that this article and the charts of proposed new plants contradict each other, because the charts don't purport to measure output or consumption of coal. I could build many small coal-fired plants and still reduce emissions if I replace the large ones with better options.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:00am PT
Ted Cruz is a professional liar:
The Planned Parenthood shooting was the work of a “transgendered leftist activist”

The Texas senator is trying and failing to spin the Planned Parenthood shootings as the work of the radical left

http://www.salon.com/2015/11/30/ted_cruz_is_a_professional_liar_the_planned_parenthood_shooting_was_the_work_of_a_transgendered_leftist_activist/


Every single one of the GOP candidates are professional liars
They are the best of the best when it comes to lying with a straight face

They know for a fact that Conservative policies do not create jobs or help the economy.

Just name a possible policy that they would agree to implement that would help anyone beside the rich, corporations or banksters.

In fact, I never even heard a conservative principle/policy that would create jobs, they have nothing for the middle class.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 11:04am PT
Did a post get deleted or something? People seem pretty upset about I'm not sure what.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:06am PT
best thing is to just post content. Someone has to turn the cheek. Take the opportunity.

eat ur own words dude..
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:12am PT
Don't think so...everything looks like the usual ad hominems to me...
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:14am PT
I appreciated your otherwise sober evaluation of the presidential candidates but I have to ask, is [Fiorina's] lack of experience in elected office really the only thing making you balk at considering Fiorina qualified?

Yes, but that's a little like asking is that fact that someone has never climbed outdoors but climbed, say, 5.13a in the gym, the only reason I wouldn't deem that person qualified to free solo Astroman. I probably would add that there's nothing like the Harding Slot, or any of many other pitches, moves or techniques, in the gym. The climber could be a natural at crack climbing, and the strength and endurance learned at the gym might propel him or her up the Enduro Corner, but saying that the climber never climbed outdoors is sufficient to justify a conclusion of a lack of qualification.

Running a publicly-traded, for-profit corporation differs so greatly from performance in elective office that I have no way of judging. The only info I have is that I don't consider her a particularly outstanding CEO. There's no evidence that satisfies me that H-P outperformed similar companies - and evidence that the opposite was true - during her tenure.

I mention her because she articulates a conservative position well. Her ability to execute, however, has yet to be proven.

John
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:25am PT
" Her ability to execute, however, has yet to be proven."

Good thing she doesn't have 'community organizer' on her CV, or you Repubs would be in quite a fix, wouldn't you?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 11:30am PT
I agree with your assessment of the transfer-ability of corporate leadership to political leadership, I guess it just distresses me a bit that you consider her rhetoric a good representation of the conservative political viewpoint and that you would want her to execute on it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 11:36am PT
Fiorina's not nuts. She strikes me as a very shrewd player. She's got very good instincts on how to appeal to her base and she's done a great job executing on it. Unfortunately, the things that are working for her require some very ugly rhetoric and a lot of pretty huge lies.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:45am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.

Dec 2, 2015 - 10:52am PT
You guys are pathetic

I just put the exact words "China is phasing out many coal plants" into the Google Machine

and it gives me an answer!!!
I guess not every one is smart as me
I must be the smartest Person in the World!

Beijing to Shut All Major Coal Power Plants to Cut Pollution
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-24/beijing-to-close-all-major-coal-power-plants-to-curb-pollution

So, they're closing 4 and building 1100.

Anyone think China's CO2 emissions will decline (or even plateau) over the next 20 years?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 11:47am PT
Well that's just it, she's appealing to a set of expectations that are beyond comprehension. For a group of people who spend so much time complaining about politicians who can't deliver on their promises we sure do expect an awful lot from them.

Edward- China is pretty eager to engage as a global player. I'm not sure how accurate that 1100 power plant number is, but they are building more solar panels than anyone. They've also been quicker to set CO2 goals than the US has. Everyone knows that a big part of making this all work is making CO2 emitting technologies expensive compared to the greener options. I'm not sure why people think China is so much less trustworthy than the US is. Their government openly states their intent and has the power to act on it. Our government is openly hostile to meeting CO2 emission goals.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:51am PT
**Leader Mitch McConnell continue to block the 9/11 heathcare bill in the Senate.
**

19 min ago - The 9/11 victims are in the hallway of Senator McConnell today, asking that he finally pass the 9/11 healthcare bill. Many have cancer and other life threating illnesses and need financial support. Why is McConnell against any kind of healthcare? ... (Its shown live on TV today,)


Why do some people vote Republican when their own Senate Leader is against
providing healthcare to the 9/11 responders?

Why do YOU vote Republican anyway, WHY?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 2, 2015 - 11:54am PT
One of Jon Stewart's best on this (or any) subject:

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/j5ujut/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-i-give-up---9-11-responders-bill
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 12:58pm PT
I think we may be looking at slightly different matters. The issue I addressed initially was whether the United States was "ready" to elect a woman President. If enough of the electorate approves of the candidate's position, I don't think the gender of the candidate will matter.

In a way it's no different from asking if we're ready to elect someone who is Jewish President. I think Bernie Sanders' positions are largely insane, but if enough disagree with me and agree with him, we're perfectly ready to elect him. His religous or ethnic affiliation isn't any real bar.

I don't see anyone saying that Fiorina has a disadvantage because she's a woman. The disadvantages they see are her experience (both what she's done and what she hasn't done) and her views, not her gender.

John
philo

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 01:22pm PT



. I think Bernie Sanders' positions are largely insane

Would you be willing to cite specific examples?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:08pm PT
Since you ask, Philo. I haven't much time to spend now, having squandered my lunch hour on the much more consequential issue of the status of the Cal football program's head coach.

I offer just one part of his platform, because I have better things to do with my time. This is taken directly from Sanders' campaign's web site:

Demanding that the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. As president, Sen. Sanders will stop corporations from shifting their profits and jobs overseas to avoid paying U.S. income taxes. He will create a progressive estate tax on the top 0.3 percent of Americans who inherit more than $3.5 million. He will also enact a tax on Wall Street speculators who caused millions of Americans to lose their jobs, homes, and life savings.

First of all, he won't enact anything. Only Congress can do that, the current administration's aggrandizement of power to the contrary notwithstanding. Of at least equal importance, what tax on "Wall Street Speculators" does he propose to enact? On what is it measured? Who pays? how much? Does he even understand the vital role speculators play in conserving resources?

What is a corporations "fair share" of taxes? Arnold Zellner proved conclusively in the American Economic Review (the most prestigious economic journal in at least the U.S., if not the world) that we cannot determine what individuals pay the corporate income tax, or any other corporate tax for that matter. How can one say a tax is "fair," or a share of the tax burden is fair, if we can't even know which individuals pay it?

Increasing the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 an hour by 2020. In the year 2015, no one who works 40 hours a week should be living in poverty.

That will do wonders for teenage employment, I'm sure.

Putting at least 13 million Americans to work by investing $1 trillion over five years towards rebuilding our crumbling roads, bridges, railways, airports, public transit systems, ports, dams, wastewater plants, and other infrastructure needs.

I hope it works better than Obamas "shovel-ready" projects did.

Reversing trade policies like NAFTA, CAFTA, and PNTR with China that have driven down wages and caused the loss of millions of jobs. If corporate America wants us to buy their products they need to manufacture those products in this country, not in China or other low-wage countries.

See Smoot-Hawley Tariff, and its effect in causing and exascerbating the Great Depression.

Creating 1 million jobs for disadvantaged young Americans by investing $5.5 billion in a youth jobs program. Today, the youth unemployment rate is off the charts. We have got to end this tragedy by making sure teenagers and young adults have the jobs they need to move up the economic ladder.

I take it we need a youth jobs programs (how do we pay for it?) because none will be employed at his $15.00/hr. minimum wage.

Fighting for pay equity by signing the Paycheck Fairness Act into law. It is an outrage that women earn just 78 cents for every dollar a man earns.

Did he bother to see if the 78 cents per dollar adjusts for, say, differences in hours worked, for just one factor? (Hint: it doesn't). Just what we need for a well-functioning economy. The government telling us what everyone should be paid.

Making tuition free at public colleges and universities throughout America. Everyone in this country who studies hard should be able to go to college regardless of income.

And what trees does he propose to plant that will produce money as fruit to pay for this?

Expanding Social Security by lifting the cap on taxable income above $250,000. At a time when the senior poverty rate is going up, we have got to make sure that every American can retire with dignity and respect.

If we lift the cap, does that not also require us to lift the benefits, or is he converting Social Security (a /de facto// welfare system) into a true welfare system?

Guaranteeing healthcare as a right of citizenship by enacting a Medicare for all single-payer healthcare system. It’s time for the U.S. to join every major industrialized country on earth and provide universal healthcare to all.

How do we pay for the right to health care/ The way the rest of the world does, by limiting treatment? Is he aware of the difficulty that "every other major industrialized country" without an expanding population is experiencing paying for its welfare state?

Requiring employers to provide at least 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave; two weeks of paid vacation; and 7 days of paid sick days. Real family values are about making sure that parents have the time they need to bond with their babies and take care of their children and relatives when they get ill.

And we pay for this how?

Enacting a universal childcare and prekindergarten program. Every psychologist understands that the most formative years for a human being is from the ages 0-3. We have got to make sure every family in America has the opportunity to send their kids to a high quality childcare and pre-K program.

See above, plus will we end up with better adults if the state raises our kids? See, e.g. the Hitler Youth.

Making it easier for workers to join unions by fighting for the Employee Free Choice Act. One of the most significant reasons for the 40-year decline in the middle class is that the rights of workers to collectively bargain for better wages and benefits have been severely undermined.

Unions have declined whenever workers are free to opt out of them. It would appear that either He thinks he knows more than every worker, or, maybe, they know more than him. The only areas were unions have expanded is for government workers. And against whom, exactly, are those government employee unions protecting their members/ The rapacious taxpayers?

Breaking up huge financial institutions so that they are no longer too big to fail. Seven years ago, the taxpayers of this country bailed out Wall Street because they were too big to fail. Yet, 3 out of the 4 largest financial institutions are 80 percent bigger today than before we bailed them out. Sen. Sanders has introduced legislation to break these banks up. As president, he will fight to sign this legislation into law.

No, we bailed out Wall Street because they had good connections in Washington, and because many thought that the way back was to "re-flate" the real estate industry. This was because government meddling in the housing market had been a major reason for the housing bubble in the first place. While I agree that nothing in the private sector should be "too big to fail," I rather susupect that nothing will be without a lot of government intervention propping it up in the first place.

Most of his policy prescriptions have been tried and failed miserably. If trying something and expecting different results from the previous trial defines insanity, there you have it. More importantly, thinking that the economy is a zero-sum system, or else that money grow on trees or is created by pixies, is true economic insanity.

I have paying work to do, so take your time on the attack.


John
philo

climber
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:14pm PT
Wow good thing you didn't have much time.
Thanks for the response.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:16pm PT
will we end up with better adults if the state raises our kids? See, e.g. the Hitler Youth.

American Public schools produce Hitler Youth!!!

I disagree with almost every word of your Fear Laden manifesto
A complete bias of reality,

Most of his policy prescriptions have been tried and failed miserably.

WRONG
they were disabled by Conservatives

They worked great here from 1938-1980, they made us the wealthiest Country in the World
and still in a lot of other First World Countries



Why do the Republicans keep trying to do Supply Side Economics??
Why do they want to lower taxes on the rich when it has proved to be an adjunct failure every time?

Iraq was supposed to be a fresh country to try Friedman Economics again, how did it work out. They fired all the Gov. workers and the free market was supposed to come to the rescue.

Chile

Are they insane?, by John's standards, Yes, the whole GOP is Insane
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
Thats why there are so many typos. Now back to paying work.

Well, first I need to thank you, Philo, for giving me a needed distraction. I'm in the process of writing a response to demand letters detailing 40 years of financial transactions. Trying to make that read in a compelling fashion probably constitutes its own form of insanity.

John
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:31pm PT
Most of his policy prescriptions have been tried and failed miserably.

WRONG
they were disabled by Conservatives

They worked great here from 1938-1980, they made us the wealthiest Country in the World
and still in a lot of other First World Countries

Which policy prescriptions are you referring to?

Which ones worked great (up to 1980) and were then disabled by Conservatives?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:45pm PT
Hey CRAIG FRY..... WTF is up with this.


Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 02:54pm PT
Supply Side Economics
Deregulation
Curbing Environmental Standards
No Campaign limitations

All tried before, all failed

all are based on one thing, greed

and don't get me started on the Libertarian movement
Just another scam devised by the rich and greedy

It's mostly composed of right wing extremist ideologues and disenfranchised Republicans.
There is no Libertarian Paradise, they are hell holes

So John
Is the GOP insane?

The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 2, 2015 - 03:17pm PT
So Craig Fry avoids the fact and reality that the top ten cities in the US with the highest POVERTY RATES are and have been run by Democrats.

Figures.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 2, 2015 - 03:24pm PT
John posted
I don't see anyone saying that Fiorina has a disadvantage because she's a woman. The disadvantages they see are her experience (both what she's done and what she hasn't done) and her views, not her gender.

Fiorina has a disadvantage because she's a woman.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 2, 2015 - 03:36pm PT
Carly Fiorina’s Lies Will Lead To Her Downfall
http://radio.foxnews.com/2015/10/02/laguens-carly-fiorinas-lies-will-lead-to-her-downfall/

Even Fox news has turned against her

She is also a professional liar
She lies about everything, or as John says, communicates the conservative message

next to take a big fall because of his Compulsive lying; Ben Carson
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 2, 2015 - 07:42pm PT
Craig,

Which policy prescriptions are you referring to?

Which ones worked great (up to 1980) and were then disabled by Conservatives?
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 2, 2015 - 08:12pm PT


When you've got the fringe righties here all heated up you know you're telling the truth.

Hmmmmm, (scratching my head).... Then by that logic Crankstar, I must be telling the "gospel truth" as I get ALL you Lefty crankaloons far above and beyond the boiling temp on a regular basis.

Thanks for reaffirming that Crankstar!!!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 2, 2015 - 09:54pm PT
I remain in awe of Trump, and what he has been able to do, basically without spending any money.

He has truly sucked all the oxygen out of the GOP tent, which has largely killed Bush. He is too low-key to get a message out. Rubio can veer right, and scream with the best of them, so he is at least on the page. But the rest, NO ONE is talking about. I don't see this changing until Iowa has run it's course, and maybe not then.

Pretty amazing.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 2, 2015 - 10:03pm PT
Ken, both Trump and H. Clinton are getting enormous amounts of free publicity from the press. For at least the last three decades the press has stopped covering the presidential race in any depth. It only reports poll results and outrageous statements, usually out of context, of those it is trying to oppose.

Meanwhile the dumbing-down of American entertainment, including, but not limited to news reporting, continues. It affects even such once-iconic bastions of intellectual propriety as "Jeopardy," which last night had a category on celebrity divorces and tonight had one on reality TV shows, among other vacuous content.

We have the press we deserve, which gives us the candidates we deserve.

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 3, 2015 - 12:37am PT
Best reality series on tv.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 05:32am PT
Presidential candidates in general get free publicity, there's nothing inherently wrong with that. Arguably, it should be the only kind of presidential publicity. I completely agree with the rest of your assessment of campaign coverage, John. Conservative media also favors the political stylings of Trump, Carson and Fiorina which is why they are doing so well with the ways they are running.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 3, 2015 - 05:42am PT
both Trump and H. Clinton are getting enormous amounts of free publicity from the press.

Awkward comparison, I think. Trump talks nonsense and Hillary talks policy.

We have the press we deserve, which gives us the candidates we deserve.
Lumping "the press" into one big basket is lazy, in my opinion. There is plenty of smart analysis and accurate reporting going on.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:20am PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 06:30am PT
crank posted
Wrong again. Lumping "the press" into one big basket is lazy. There is plenty of smart analysis and accurate reporting going on. Look deeper.

Take it easy, dude. I think his point is that the MSM is profit driven which means its looking for the most entertaining way to engage viewers (and up viewership). There is good stuff out there but in the last 15 years flagship media companies have shed much of their investigative reporters. John Stewart got a lot of content about the lack of tough questioning and the lack of follow up in political interviews. There is also a bias there because there are so many news outlets, politicians can have their pick. Trump told Fox to eat it and they literally crawled back to him begging for forgiveness. If a journalist is tough on a candidate, especially on live TV, then they simply won't go back on those programs and the journalist loses access and can no longer do their job effectively. There's a catch 22 there and the public is complicit in it.
philo

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:37am PT


The Bromance the Right wing conservatives have with Putin is disturbing.
Apparently a Black President who is at heart a Democrat with roots in community organizing is a greater threat to Amerikkka than A white man who is at heart a Communist with roots in the secret police.

I suggest our resident rightwingnutz wrap them selves much tighter in the Flag.
The Confederate flag that is.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:38am PT
Good one, Edward!
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:41am PT
I'm relaxed, HDDJ. I'm also perfectly comfortable with my ability to sift through various news sources to get to the heart of an issue. What is the "mainstream media", anyway? Fox like to takes shots at them when they are the most-watched cable news channel. How much more mainstream can you get? Is the PBS News Hour mainstream? I don't think so.

The point about the media being profit driven is taken. That's why Trump is where he is. He's entertaining. In a bad way.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:50am PT
We can gripe about Fox and MSNBC all day long, but the networks still dominate. From what I see, they're all about sensationalism.

Watch ABC World News, Inside Edition and Entertain Tonight in succession. All three will have the same stories. Those stories take up majority of each program.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 06:50am PT
I was only trying to urge you to take it down a notch in starting off your response with calling him wrong. It sounds like you probably agree with him to some extent. Exploring those areas of agreement/disagreement are a lot more interesting and real than just insisting that each other is wrong. We're all wrong.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 3, 2015 - 06:52am PT
I get your point and made an edit.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 07:00am PT
Woot! One post at a time, we make the Taco a better place.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 08:31am PT
JEleazarian wrote:
It affects even such once-iconic bastions of intellectual propriety as "Jeopardy," which last night...

Aha!!!! you do watch it!
I've always loved Jeopardy and the intellectual content of that show truly dwarfs today's poltical commentary.

So many of my leftwing friends get their points and views from shows like Comedy Central or Bill Maher.

It's all about the popular culture.

I personally like Bill Maher, but his religious rants can get downright reptilian. I'm not religious, but why ridicule and disrespect half of your audience?
The best moment ever on Bill Maher's show was several years ago when British intellectual Christopher Hitchens flipped off the infantile and predictable peanut gallery audience...twice.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 09:28am PT
Maher sometimes has some worthwhile insights that he states in a blunt manner. I can tolerate him as counterweight to some of the insanity that goes on in right wing media (and sometimes goes mainstream). His views on religion are nothing short of abhorrent.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 09:47am PT
dirtbag

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 09:58am PT
Well, it looks like the latest version of Lois has been booted, lol.

She/dmt will be back.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 09:59am PT
Dingus,
LMAO

Doesn't James Carville's wife call him "Serpent Head"?
He's a hit man, but I've always enjoyed Carvilles's wit...he's funny.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:09am PT
So many of my leftwing friends get their points and views from shows like Comedy Central or Bill Maher.


Yes, and they cite them to...

Next time I get it on with one of them I will quote Groucho Marx...


And just to toss this out their on the floor.

I listen to lots of Radio Shows, L & R .... I have listened to every Repub candidate speak at length with out interruption from some dip#ST& moderator. Sanders also.... I think its nice to hear them put 4 or 5 sentences together....

Except for Hillery.... they (the media) have only shown her doing EVENTS... you know reading off of the teleprompter. From what I have seen SHE only speaks in slogans and platitudes.

Anybody got a link to a Hillery interview??? I'll gladly read....
Norton

Social climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:13am PT
Anybody got a link to a Hillery interview??? I'll gladly read....

you could google "Hillary Clinton interviews" and then also hit "videos" for more
John M

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:20am PT
I suppose most would label me a liberal. I have mostly voted democrat.

I do not like Hillary Clinton. I have never liked her.

Yet if it comes down to Hillary versus Trump or Jeb Bush, I would vote for Hillary.

I very much hope that Bernie Sanders beats Hillary, even if I don['t agree with everything he says.

I believe that Bernie is a much more honorable person then HIllary, Trump, or Bush.

philo

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:30am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:49am PT
Philo, how effective do you think a vote to reduce mass shootings would be? I personally think it would be about as effective as a vote to reduce sin, or a vote to make crime more illegal.

I, for one, am tired of votes made for show. That includes both votes to repeal Obamacare, which will never withstand a veto during this administration, and "votes to reduce mass shootings." If we really wanted to reduce mass shootings, we'd treat them the way sports broadcasters learned to treat fans that came on the field during games -- they refused to show them on the broadcast. If you want to reduce (I doubt you can stop) mass shootings, don't publicize them so strikingly.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303309504579181702252120052

Instead, we publicize them over and over and over again to make political points for our sides, and because for over a century, "If it bleeds, it leads" has been the mantra of the news business. The pro-gun side says it shows why everyone should be armed. The anti-gun side says it shows why we need greater control of gun ownership. The predictable result is that we get more copycat mass shootings.

John
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 3, 2015 - 10:53am PT
Lois got the boot again, huh? Not surprising, but damn funny.

So, Craig...now are you convinced?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 10:53am PT
John, I can understand being sick of the political rhetoric but that's not really an excuse to stop covering them. If we are going to continue doing nothing we should at least have to watch the fruits of our inaction. You're also being purposefully obtuse about the poorly worded cartoon. Obviously it's implying legislation to achieve that end, not a "Resolution to Reduce Gun Violence."

Why did someone report Lois? What was she doing that was harmful? I'm personally all for forgiving these folks. Fatty, Lois, DMT whoever else got booted more than a year or two ago. Excluding people permanently seems absurd.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:10am PT
HDDJ it isn't so much about covering them as how we cover them. We learn all about the perps. Think of something like the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing -- a horrendous mass murder. Timothy McVeigh got one enormous amount of publicity. Even his last words from "Invictus" got covered ad nauseum.

It doesn't matter the weapon used. We end up learning all about the perpetrators, which puts them (admittedly, often posthumously) in the spotlight, which is what they seek. The article urges less coverage of the murderers themselves.

Unfortunately, that prescription doesn't fit the desires of those who want no crisis or disaster to go to waste. The "gun nuts" want to focus on the shooters to demonstrate that they were people who, often, should not have had access to firearms under current law. Thus, they claim, gun control is useless. The "anti-gun nuts" want to focus on the shooting - and every aspect thereof - to keep the desire to reduce them in the public mind. The media wants to keep people watching, listening and reading, and our corrupted minds remain fascinated, it seems, but the sorts of deviants that would commit such monstrous acts. Therefore, all have a motivation to keep the perps in the news.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:14am PT
There is no evidence that the new poster got booted because she was Lois

But it is weird.



I listen to both sides too

And once you look for the lies, you can see that the Whole GOP campaign is based on lies

Use wedge issues to dupe idiots
cut social services
start wars
bankrupt the country
give cronies tax breaks
have a smear campaign on all dissenting opinions
buy up the media and fill the dupe's heads with propaganda
Keep the populace at low wages fighting for jobs

You have to be an idiot to vote for any one of them, they're all corrupt to the gills

But these facts won't change anyone's minds, they will just repeat the BS about how they hate Obama and Hillary,
blame someone else, don't check the facts, the bought out media will tell you them, and who to hate.
philo

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:14am PT
A marble bust of Dick Cheney is being unveiled today in the Senate. Cheney will attend the ceremony, along with George W., for whom he served as vice president. Cheney’s likeness joins those of more than 40 other vice presidents, scattered inside and outside the Senate chamber.

Personally, I think there should be a separate Hall of Shame in the Capitol Building containing the busts of presidents and vice presidents, like Cheney, who have disgraced themselves and the nation. For those of you too young to remember, Dick Cheney was the brain behind George W. Bush’s otherwise brainless presidency – the man who engineered the Iraqi War, who fooled America into thinking Saddam Hussein was hiding weapons of mass destruction, and who arranged for and justified torture. If there were justice in the world, Dick Cheney would be tried and convicted as a war criminal. That he is being memorialized today with a marble bust in the Senate is an insult to America and to humanity.

What do you think?


JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:20am PT
give cronies tax breaks
have a smear campaign on all dissenting opinions
buy up the media and fill the dupe's heads with propaganda

That describes Hillary's campaign pretty well.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-tax-credit-sweepstakes-1448928410

As for bankrupting the country, the pensions the Democrats granted to public employees have only begun to hit state and local budgets. Just wait a few years. Virtually all of government expenditures not used to cover debt service (which will become enormous when interest rates rise) will go to pay for those pensions.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 11:23am PT
John posted
Unfortunately, that prescription doesn't fit the desires of those who want no crisis or disaster to go to waste. The "gun nuts" want to focus on the shooters to demonstrate that they were people who, often, should not have had access to firearms under current law. Thus, they claim, gun control is useless. The "anti-gun nuts" want to focus on the shooting - and every aspect thereof - to keep the desire to reduce them in the public mind. The media wants to keep people watching, listening and reading, and our corrupted minds remain fascinated, it seems, but the sorts of deviants that would commit such monstrous acts. Therefore, all have a motivation to keep the perps in the news.

John, you're falling into a bit of a false equivalency trap as well as the same kind of generalizations the mass media is guilty of. People who think we need tighter gun control don't want these events to go to waste because America has proven immune to any kind of progress on the issue without it. There's no incentive to popularize the perps by pro-gun control people either, because it's the tool were talking about, not as much the person. The idea of covering the perps less has been bandied about for a long time but I don't think thats a panacea.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 3, 2015 - 11:24am PT
Philo posted
What do you think?

I think people need to be reminded that they voted for him twice.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:29am PT
Give me a break John

Let's see a link to Hillary giving tax breaks to her cronies
a smear campaign against Who?
Owns what Main Stream Media?

you are 100% wrong

Why lie, or do you really believe the stuff you post



Fox and 100 more media sites are owned by who?
$18 trillion was racked by who? pensions?
wow, good deflection, you got me so worried

No, it was racked by Conservative policies and the pensions were robbed by conservative policies
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:33am PT
Did you click the link I provided, Craig?

I haven't even started with the crony capitalism involved in "green" energy.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 3, 2015 - 11:37am PT
so weak
total hit peace
should we look at the GOP cronies, like Halliburton
The NRA, Wallstreet, oil, coal, everything EXCEPT Green Energy

The Democratic candidates are conducting a lively fiscal bidding war. Bernie Sanders favors some $18 trillion in new spending over a decade, give or take a few hundred billion, and raising taxes on the middle class—in part at least—to pay for it. Hillary Clinton supports somewhat less new spending, but she also disguises a huge chunk of her income transfers through the tax code.
WSJ=Fox News

We give Billions away to them because of conservatives.

Thank God the Dems are helping out Green Energy

the GOP is trying to kill Green Energy so they can keep the billions in profits for their cronies
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
JEleazarian wrote:
Virtually all of government expenditures not used to cover debt service (which will become enormous when interest rates rise) will go to pay for those pensions.


Big voting constituency there...Democrats are whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Jorroh

climber
Dec 3, 2015 - 01:16pm PT
"John, you're falling into a bit of a false equivalency trap"

You just noticed?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 3, 2015 - 01:47pm PT
John!!
I say something about the GOP and you predictably shift the blame to Hillary and the Dems

Can you ever be objective?

answer me this one question
What is a conservative policy that creates jobs and strengthens the economy?

explain your talking points, how it works, if it requires magic dust, we will call it out.
.
The Dems have no working policies now because the GOP has obstructed them, so we are waiting for the GOP to do something, like they said they would.
Where are the Jobs?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 3, 2015 - 08:16pm PT
Give the guy a break. He's trying to read long, foreign words that he's never heard before, that someone else wrote for him.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 07:12am PT
John posted
I haven't even started with the crony capitalism involved in "green" energy.

In America we call that "democracy." Let me know when it hits 1% of the cash doled out to fossil fuel companies and then I'll read up on it.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 4, 2015 - 08:40am PT

Marco Rubio’s Mistress is Coming Forward … Things Are About to Get UGLY

http://thepatriotnation.net/marco-rubios-mistress-is-coming-forward-things-are-about-to-get-ugly/

The thing about running for president is that all of those pesky skeletons in your closet get exposed for the world to see.

For Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), his biggest skeleton apparently has a nice pair of gams and an irresistible sex appeal.

According to one South Carolina insider, Rubio had an affair with a Washington, D.C. lobbyist and her identity is about to be revealed to the world.

Apparently, the woman was identified by researchers who were delving into Rubio’s disastrous financial past.

Her identity is reportedly being leaked to “multiple mainstream media outlets” this week.



Will this doom Rubio, probably not, he will say he asked for God's forgiveness and the dupes will be OK with that,
then he'll go back to his normal compulsive lying and no one will care until he gets caught again



My prediction. Chris Christy will come out of the shadows
He's the only Mainstream GOP left that has any broad appeal.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 08:43am PT
I don't think anyone will care.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 08:47am PT
It's not his fault. Had Hillary not used a private email server and lied about Benghazi, he wouldn't have cheated.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 4, 2015 - 08:51am PT
I guess there is no Conservative Job's plan
Nor any plan to strengthen the economy

Nor is there any plan to control health care costs
to help the middle class
to feed hungry American white children
to enforce criminal actions on employers that employ illegal aliens

But that makes sense;
The Conservatives were the ones that destroyed our economy through deregulation
They shipped the jobs oversees
they are in bed with the big insurance companies
They have no empathy for starving children, or empathy for anyone except their small tribe
they want cheap labor
They hate green energy
they hate considering the environmental factors
They don't care the future, exploit now, dump the problems on the future
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 4, 2015 - 09:00am PT
John, you're falling into a bit of a false equivalency trap as well as the same kind of generalizations the mass media is guilty of. People who think we need tighter gun control don't want these events to go to waste because America has proven immune to any kind of progress on the issue without it.

I think (or at least hope) you're missing my point. I'm not saying that every reason for keeping mass shootings in the forefront has equal validity. I was simply explaining why it will prove unlikely that the media will change its coverage of them, viz. that both sides of the debate have incentives to keep mass shootings in the spotlight. They may emphasize different aspects or reasons, but the result is the same. They remain front and center, and the killers get the attention they seek.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 4, 2015 - 09:06am PT
The more mass shooting are sensationalized
The more gun sales

More guns have been sold in the last 2 weeks than ever before

Hysteria, fear, paranoia, doom, and all the rest of the base reptilian brain emotions..
Gun nuts feed on it.

do the killers really seek attention??
I don't think so, they do it out of anger and hate
an emotional overload of anger to the point that they feel they must kill and screw the consequences

This is all a media caused situation, it sells like nothing else
dirtbag

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 09:38am PT
Anyway, that source reporting Rubio's affair is pretty lame. One article addresses a singer's "nip slip" on live tv; another addresses a sexy weatherwoman's wardrobe malfunction. Not exactly the NY Times.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 09:58am PT
I hope it's not true about Mr. Rubio either

for heaven's sake, his party has suffered enough at their own hands lately

they just have to catch a break

why just this week Senate Majority Leader McConnell is refusing to allow a vote on
extending healthcare for the 9/11 First Responders, even knowing that there are enough vote vote for it to pass in the Senate

because doing so would be fiscally irresponsible, or something

why do some people vote Republican again?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 4, 2015 - 09:59am PT
John!!
I say something about the GOP and you predictably shift the blame to Hillary and the Dems

Can you ever be objective?

answer me this one question
What is a conservative policy that creates jobs and strengthens the economy?

Craig, please don't interpret a delay in responding as a lack of a reasoned response. Conservatives have a tendency to work. In my case, I also have a rehearsal for a chamber chorale in which I sing that ends at 9:00 p.m. on Thursdays, and a meeting that begins at 5:00 a.m. on Fridays.

Conservative policies that create jobs and strengthen the economy have their basis on a fact that Hillary Clinton apparently denies: businesses employ people and thereby create jobs. HC claims businesses do not create jobs, NBC creating one for Chelsea to the contrary notwithstanding. (A cheap shot, I know, but I couldn't imagine any of the Democrats on this board not beating to death stupid things Republican politicians say, so fair's fair. But see, Democrats who say "that's a false equivalence!"

Conservative policy therefore prescribes governmental action that allows the private sector to function in a way most likely to optimize job creation. These include, but are not limited to:

1. Stable prices. This means the government should not pursue policies such as rapid changes in the money supply. Instead, the money supply should expand as the economy expands. Fiscal policy is a much more effective tool for dealing with short-term shifts.

2. Predictable laws enforced with consistency. The more the government acts like a two-bit dictatorship, the less desirable that country becomes as a target for investment. This means you don't make a KXL Pipeline applicant jump through a million hoops and then kill it just because your megabuck contributors paid you to do so. It also means you don't change multi-decade precedents in labor or securities law just because your megabuck contributors paid you to do so.

3. Intelligent taxation laws. This means that government does not impose one of the highest corporate tax rates in the industrial world, and then tax on top of that any corporate earnings abroad when they are repatriated. You also aren't surprised that if you have taxes described in the previous paragraph, those foreign earnings don't get repatriated.

4. Encouragement of the free movement of goods and services. This means you don't impose tariffs on foreign goods just because your megabuck contributors paid you to do so. You don't impose regulations or enact laws that penalize the movement of goods and people just because your megabuck contributors paid you to do so. This means you have policies that allow foreign nationals to work in the United States without undue interference, despite opposition by your megabuck contributors who think they paid you to keep the foreign nationals out. The only intelligent interference with the free flow of goods and services would be in externalities such as pollution or national security.

5. Understanding that business is a friend of jobs and growth, not an enemy.

This is only a partial list, but it illustrates the major difference between conservative policies and those which Craig advocates, namely more regulation, higher taxes and less freedom. When conservative policies are in effect, the economy grows. When the government takes over, as it has during the current administration, it stagnates, except for those in power.

The current Democratic party gets most of its contributions from the following:

1. Government employee unions. They believe they have bought and paid for a party that will seek to maximize the employment of unionized government workers;

2. Plaintiff's attorneys. They believe they have bought and paid for a party that will seek to maximize the recovery for plaintiffs generally, and the employment of lawyers generally;

3. "Green" businesses. They believe they have bought and paid for a party that will seek to force people to buy "green" products they would not otherwise purchase;

4. Businesses afraid of competition. They believe they have bought and paid for a party that will seek to enact large barriers to entry in their markets; and

5. Wealthy individuals who are happy with their lifestyles. They think they have bought and paid for a party that will make it difficult to change anything (called by them, environmental protection) and also make it difficult for others to join their ranks.

Understanding this enables one to understand the shortcomings of the Democrats in economic policy. The Democrats tend to be economic reactionaries. Their policies reflect a terror of change, and a terror of allowing people to choose for themselves. Not surprisingly, the economy does better when people are free to choose what they want to do and what they want to buy, because such freedom tends to make for a much better match of resources to desires than one imposed by a plethora of "leeches" (to use Gary's word) whose only function is to prevent people from getting what they want.

Ok, I'm being too harsh. A good economy requires a good legal system, which requires intelligent regulation and laws. I believe that the vast increase in costly regulation, the arbitrary and capricious nature of the regulators, and the tendency to make economic decisions based on the identity of the parties, rather than the economic value involved, all during this administration's tenure caused the dismally weak recovery the U.S. has experienced.

The rapid recovery under Reagan shows what can happen with intelligent policies. The anemia the economy exhibited during most of the Obama administration shows what happens with stupid policies. If the massive increase in domestic hydrocarbon extraction -- which occurred despite tremendous obstacles placed by Democrats -- had not taken place, we probably would be in even worse shape.

Craig, your argument against deregulation assumes a free lunch -- that the regulators will have the knowledge that will enable them to make intelligent regulations. Let's see how that worked in the housing bubble. While those adhering to your argument blame the (bipartisan) repeal of Glass-Steagall, they fail to show a causal connection. More importantly, they ignore what the bureaucrats running federal housing policy did during the time of the bubble. If those regulators saw a bubble, and saw the consequences, you sure can't tell by their actions. The Wall Street Journal, among other conservative voices, was shouting about the danger of Fannie and Freddie, but both the regulators and congress, particularly Barney Frank and Charles Dodd, resisted calls for reform. That makes the irony that the bill that allegedly fixes the problem, whose regulations continue to multiply, came from those same two individuals.

OK. That's enough for now. I have work to do, and see diminishing marginal utility in repeating our discussions. I will let others decide which, if either, of us is objective.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:05am PT
Neither of you is objective.

That's what I suspected, which is why I worded my comments the way I did.

Back to work.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:07am PT
The rapid recovery under Reagan shows what can happen with intelligent policies.
Yes of huge Government increases in spending and employing people was a boast to the economy

And which policies of Obama's aren't working?
The austerity imposed by the GOP and is which NOT a Obama policy

Thanks for the effort John, but it's mostly just partisan spin
blame this, shift blame away from that
some of it is just plain wrong

You add a lot of magic dust to your description of how things work, and that has been tried over and over, and has never worked (insane)

We had practically 35 years of Reaganomics, and this is predictably the outcome of it all
No Jobs, and a weakened economy
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:44am PT
"Conservatives have a tendency to work."

Cheap shot!
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:47am PT
The rapid recovery under Reagan shows what can happen with intelligent policies.

I remember the Reagan recovery. That is, if a recovery is picking your self up after having your ass thrown out on the street because the plant you worked in was moving to Mexico and cashing in on a tax break for doing so.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:51am PT
The rapid recovery under Reagan shows what can happen with intelligent policies.


oh, you must mean the RECESSION and doubling of the national debt under Reagan?

skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:51am PT
Sounds like this thread needs bacon. Yup. Machine gun bacon.

Back to work. Guess I'm more republican than I thought :)
John M

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:55am PT
Businesses create Jobs????

Nonsense. Buyers create a market which businesses then fill, which creates jobs. Without buyers, you have no market, and hence no businesses.

As for our countries recovery under Reagan. You need to look deeper. Supply side economics is the economics of greed. Our countries economy has devolved to become greed based, so its no wonder that it recovered well under Reagans policies.

This is not to condone Obama, just simply to point out the fallacy of supply side economics.

guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:57am PT
John, Thank you.

well said.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:58am PT
"This is not to condone Obama, just simply to point out the fallacy of supply side economics. "


Sorry, that will be unacceptable to the Right. Anything less than a tender Reagan ballcupping is consider Obamalove.
John M

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:04am PT
The thing that I think that needs to be discussed is what exactly is the core of the dissatisfaction this country is currently undergoing. The dissatisfaction that Trump is tapping into. How much is real, and how much is manufactured dissatisfaction.

Such as.. I believe that it is real that we have too many poorly thought out regulations which are open to abuse. Example. Overly complicated tax code. I don't head towards oversimplification, such as a flat tax, but I do see a need to rewrite the tax code.

Also the overextension of powers of the IRS. Where one is considered guilty until one has proven themselves innocent.

I also see the broadening of the gap between wealthy and everyone else as a problem.

What other problems or issues are leading to this overall dissatisfaction?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:23am PT
+1 john M

What are the voters begging for?

They thought change was going to work..

Now it looks like they want more COMPETENCY
Norton

Social climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:27am PT
Interesting, Pyro

is that why the polls are saying another Democrat, Hillary, is highly likely to be Pres?

cause they want less change and more "competency"?

in fact some polls are saying Bernie Sanders beat any Republican heads up and he
is far behind Hillary in the Democratic polling

unless there is something else you are basing your "opinion" on?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 11:29am PT
The rapid recovery under Reagan shows what can happen with intelligent policies.

He had a cooperative, Democratic congress the whole time for starters. Secondly, can we please stop pretending that Presidents are at the driver's wheel of the economy? The only people who seem to believe this are journalists and politicians.

Lastly,

When President Obama moved into the Oval Office, the nation was not gripped in the throes of inflation. As a result, it was not a situation where he could subject the nation to a year or two of pain that comes from the Fed quickly raising interest rates only to see the inevitable economic boom that follows when those interest rates plummet downwards. Indeed, what we experienced was quite the opposite as the Fed lowered rates to entice banks to loan money, with an eye always on the frightening prospect of deflation.

In reality, there is little about the economic issues President Reagan inherited that is similar to what President Obama faced—and that is why the comparison between the two is one of apples and oranges.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2014/09/18/the-obama-economy-vs-the-reagan-economy-its-literally-no-contest/


pyro posted
Now it looks like they want more COMPETENCY

Agreed. Hillary, Jeb and Kasich are the only ones up there who can claim to be able to have the experience to accomplish this. Unfortunately, the 2 Republicans are getting whomped because competency is exactly the opposite of what the Republican base is clamoring for.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:44am PT
Polls show Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Trump and Bush beating Hillary.

Love those polls.

10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:52am PT
The thing that I think that needs to be discussed is what exactly is the core of the dissatisfaction this country is currently undergoing. The dissatisfaction that Trump is tapping into. How much is real, and how much is manufactured dissatisfaction.
1) people are tired of political correctness
2) people are tired of entitlement programs

Such as.. I believe that it is real that we have too many poorly thought out regulations which are open to abuse. Example. Overly complicated tax code. I don't head towards oversimplification, such as a flat tax, but I do see a need to rewrite the tax code.

I agree that a flat tax won't work, but a national sales tax might.


I also see the broadening of the gap between wealthy and everyone else as a problem.

I don't see this as the big issue that the media portends
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 11:58am PT
10b posted
1) people are tired of being able to drop N-bombs whenever they want...er...I mean political correctness


Fixed that for you. It's hard to find people more politically correct than the current Republican base. Don't call Benghazi "terrorism" before you have all the facts? Not politically correct. Don't call undocumented immigrants "illegals?" Not politically correct. Suggest that we take climate change seriously because the evidence supports it? Not politically correct. Dare to used a technical economic term like "redistribution?" Two years of political correct backlash.

Republican candidates walk the most absurdly tight rope and if they slip up once and dare to insinuate that the most far right idea being put forward isn't 100% perfect, they get politically crucified. They are completely obsessed with it.
Sierra Ledge Rat

Mountain climber
Old and Broken Down in Appalachia
Dec 4, 2015 - 12:01pm PT
Polls show Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Trump and Bush beating Hillary.
That's utterly frightening
But then again, "President Hillary" is only slightly less terrifying.
John M

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 12:09pm PT
I also see the broadening of the gap between wealthy and everyone else as a problem.

I don't see this as the big issue that the media portends

I disagree, because of the weakening of the middle class.
philo

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 12:10pm PT
EdT what a stupid Poll-ish Joke.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 12:19pm PT
Polls show Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Trump and Bush beating Hillary.

I think you mean there ARE polls that show them beating Hillary.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

General Election: Trump vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 47, Trump 41 Clinton +6
General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Clinton 47, Cruz 42 Clinton +5
General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Rubio 44, Clinton 45 Clinton +1
General Election: Carson vs. Clinton Quinnipiac Carson 43, Clinton 46 Clinton +3
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders Quinnipiac Sanders 49, Trump 41 Sanders +8
General Election: Cruz vs. Sanders Quinnipiac Sanders 49, Cruz 39 Sanders +10
General Election: Rubio vs. Sanders Quinnipiac Sanders 44, Rubio 43 Sanders +1
General Election: Carson vs. Sanders Quinnipiac Carson 41, Sanders 47 Sanders +6
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 41, Trump 46 Trump +5
General Election: Carson vs. Clinton FOX News Carson 47, Clinton 42 Carson +5
General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton FOX News Rubio 50, Clinton 42 Rubio +8
General Election: Bush vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 39, Bush 45 Bush +6
General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 41, Cruz 45 Cruz +4
General Election: Fiorina vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 42, Fiorina 42 Tie
General Election: Christie vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 43, Christie 46 Christie +3
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders FOX News Sanders 41, Trump 46 Trump +5
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 45, Trump 44 Clinton +1
General Election: Carson vs. Clinton PPP (D) Carson 45, Clinton 46 Clinton +1
General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton PPP (D) Rubio 45, Clinton 43 Rubio +2
General Election: Bush vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 43, Bush 41 Clinton +2
General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton PPP (D) Clinton 46, Cruz 44 Clinton +2
New Hampshire: Trump vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 47, Trump 40 Clinton +7
New Hampshire: Rubio vs. Clinton FOX News Rubio 47, Clinton 40 Rubio +7
New Hampshire: Carson vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 43, Carson 45 Carson +2
New Hampshire: Bush vs. Clinton FOX News Bush 45, Clinton 42 Bush +3
New Hampshire: Cruz vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 44, Cruz 41 Clinton +3
New Hampshire: Kasich vs. Clinton FOX News Kasich 43, Clinton 40 Kasich +3
New Hampshire: Fiorina vs. Clinton FOX News Fiorina 43, Clinton 43 Tie
New Hampshire: Christie vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 44, Christie 43 Clinton +1
Virginia: Trump vs. Clinton Roanoke College Clinton 50, Trump 36 Clinton +14
Virginia: Carson vs. Clinton Roanoke College Carson 44, Clinton 44 Tie
Virginia: Rubio vs. Clinton Roanoke College Clinton 45, Rubio 41 Clinton +4
Virginia: Cruz vs. Clinton Roanoke College Clinton 47, Cruz 39 Clinton +8
Virginia: Bush vs. Clinton Roanoke College Clinton 46, Bush 39 Clinton +7
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders PPP (D) Sanders 41, Trump 44 Trump +3
General Election: Carson vs. Sanders PPP (D) Carson 46, Sanders 39 Carson +7
General Election: Rubio vs. Sanders PPP (D) Sanders 38, Rubio 44 Rubio +6
General Election: Bush vs. Sanders PPP (D) Sanders 39, Bush 42 Bush +3
General Election: Cruz vs. Sanders PPP (D) Sanders 39, Cruz 44 Cruz +5

philo

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 12:38pm PT
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/3/1411482/-Former-GOP-lawmaker-says-Republicans-are-not-rational-and-have-a-12-year-old-s-kind-of-thinking
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 4, 2015 - 04:33pm PT
I hate the "Free Lunch" analogy of John's

anything that sounds like a free lunch is automatically deemed bad and unsustainable

He has it 100% backwards, that's what the Government does, it gives out free lunches
It promotes the health of the society as a whole by providing education, grants, scholarships, loans etc.
We were a great Country because we invested in our society, infrastructure and people

But instead, we invest in the military now.


that the regulators will have the knowledge that will enable them to make intelligent regulations.
Crazy talk
Regulations came about from the same reason every time, they were imposed because of a prior situation that someone was taking advantage of.
No regulation is just made up for no reason, the reason for the regulation was if they didn't have it all hell would break loose.



AND
Businesses WANT regulations, they want to be protected from monopolies and other criminal intent.

They want to know what the rules are, and abide by them
Your free for all markets scare the hell out business because they don't know what's legal and what's not.
And we have seen what happens when the regulations are cut, the vultures come out and take advantage of them.

Deregulation is like having a football game without rules, anything goes, no one can predict what will happen next, screw the lines, drop the ball, go for the balls, ignore the clock, the exact opposite of the Stability you say is good

Deregulation is promoted for one reason, greed
It does not create jobs

Free Lunches Create Jobs
It's all about what the Gov. invests in, people or the military industrial complex and oil which ends up in the pockets of the already rich
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 4, 2015 - 04:42pm PT
Here's a thing...


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/catholic-hospital-argues-_n_2534383.html

Catholic Hospital Argues Fetuses Are Not People In Malpractice Suit

...but when it came to mounting a defense in the Stodghill case, Catholic Health’s lawyers effectively turned the Church directives on their head. Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect “unborn persons,” and Catholic Health’s lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments. Instead, they are arguing state law protects doctors from liability concerning unborn fetuses on grounds that those fetuses are not persons with legal rights.

As Jason Langley, an attorney with Denver-based Kennedy Childs, argued in one of the briefs he filed for the defense, the court “should not overturn the long-standing rule in Colorado that the term ‘person,’ as is used in the Wrongful Death Act, encompasses only individuals born alive. Colorado state courts define ‘person’ under the Act to include only those born alive. Therefore Plaintiffs cannot maintain wrongful death claims based on two unborn fetuses.”
krahmes

Social climber
Stumptown
Dec 4, 2015 - 10:30pm PT
I worked up a bro science spreadsheet on the posters to this thread at a post count of 403 and classified each post into one of 8 categories: Drony, Angry, Preachy, Snarky, Insane(y), Boss(y), Chart(y) and Meme(y). The classification was subjective and made after reading at least 10% of each post or looking at the meme or chart for a half second.

Boss(y) is the best, Snarky is good, Chart(y) and Meme(y) is that I take your point or reference as valid, Drony is like white noise, Preachy is like spare me, Angry is angry and Insane(y) is crazy talk. 43 posters are on this thread as it stands now.
The top 11 posters on this thread are:

Philo: 54 total: Drony=18; Angry=18; Preachy=3; Snarky=2; Insane=7; Meme=7
HighDesertDJ: 51 total: Drony=31; Angry=4; Preachy=12; Snarky=2; Bossy=1 Chart=2
Craig Fry: 38 total: Drony=12; Angry=24; Preachy=1; Meme=1
The Chief: 33 total: Drony=5; Preachy=2; Snarky=2; Boss=10 (what can I say he is great at tossing flies and his memes are solid); Chart=9; and Meme=9
Apogee: 21 total: Drony=19; Preachy=1; Snarky=1
Jeleazarian: 19 total: Drony= 10; Boss=9
Cranskster: 18 total: Drony=8; Angry=5; Preachy=2; Insane=1; Meme=2
Norton: 16 total: Drony=10; Angry=4; Insane=1; Meme=1
EdwardT: 12 total: Drony=10: Meme=2
HermitMaster: 10 total: Drony=4; Boss=1; Meme=5
Dirtbag: 10 total: Drony=9; Preachy=1

The surprising piece of data for me is that I thought philo would win the angry count but Craig Fry is strong on the vitriol and surged to the top position as probably the angriest man on Supertopo. Anyway this video is dedicated to Craig Fry, philo, and crankster: Lighten up Sandra.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
philo

climber
Dec 4, 2015 - 11:32pm PT
Wow you really have a lot of spare time and pitiful hobby.
But do you feel better now?

How was my angry snark?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 5, 2015 - 06:59am PT
My analysis, based on reading 13.2% of krahmes post and subdividing by the coefficient of cheeky (.463):

krahmes: 1, but dumbest post on the thread. Not easy given the completion. Congratulations! And thanks for not re-posting the Charlton Heston NRA video.

This data is a bit surprising given the repetition of rightwing media talking points. But my results are accurate, he's the winner.

krahmes, my suggested therapy: take a long hike or swim. Long.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 5, 2015 - 07:39am PT
'Drony'? Me? Let me tell you what I think about that.

There is a dark force working to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights. That dark force is Krahmes. To get immediately to the point, Krahmes has recently stated that this is the best of all possible worlds and that he is the best of all possible people. Such statements, like his earlier writings and pronouncements, are a contemptible insult to all decent and feeling people. I've tried explaining to his apple-polishers that I'm sure we would all appreciate a remote control with the power to mute him whenever he goes into a long-winded rant about how matters of racial justice should enter a period of “benign neglect”. Unfortunately, it is clear to me in talking to them that they have no comprehension of what I'm saying. I might as well be talking to creatures from Mars. In fact, I'd bet Martians would be more likely to discern that over time, Krahmes's litanies have progressed from being merely intemperate to being superintemperate, hyperintemperate, and recently ultraintemperate. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megaintemperate.

Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of Krahmes's lieutenants about whether or not he started as merely a contumelious geek but quickly devolved into a snippy erastophiliac, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that wherever abrasive lowbrows are seen turning back the clock and repealing all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books, Krahmes is there. Wherever fatuitous doomsday prophets are found humiliating, subjugating, and eventually eliminating everyone who wants to begin the invigorating, rejuvenating process of offering a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus, Krahmes is lurking nearby. Wherever hateful dossers are observed punishing dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death, Krahmes will no doubt be in the vicinity. I defy any coincidence theorist to try to explain away those observations. Clearly, Krahmes will create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to find more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses the most haughty tax cheats I've ever seen with odious and uncontrollable rage.

The devastation caused by Krahmes's ramblings is entropic, but it does not have to be inevitable. That is, if we are vigilant in inculcating in the reader an inquisitive spirit and a skepticism about beliefs that Krahmes's disciples take for granted we will be able to sway people towards the realization that a central point of his belief systems is the notion that his writings are a veritable encyclopedia of everything that is directly pertinent to mankind's spiritual and intellectual development. Perhaps Krahmes should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that if one dares to criticize even a single tenet of his snow jobs, one is promptly condemned as sniveling, sexist, obstreperous, or whatever epithet he deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. If Fate desired that Krahmes make a correct application of what he had read about teetotalism it would have to indicate title and page number since the nettlesome galoot would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, we must always remember that Krahmes's disorderly objectives are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, he can replace such people with compliant, Krahmes-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to champion the poor and oppressed against the evil of Krahmes. These automata will guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community in the immediate years ahead.

I plan to expose some of Krahmes's officious deeds. Are you with me—or against me? Whatever you decide, Krahmes's view is that the stork is responsible for procreation. If Krahmes's adversarial, amoral pals had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would undoubtedly be rendered revolting to their better feelings. I personally want nothing more—or less—than to take away as many of Krahmes's opportunities for mischief as possible. To that task I have consecrated my life and I invite you to do likewise. If Krahmes honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.

While some information provided by Krahmes's acolytes may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or brutish perceptions. Krahmes's cat's-paws claim to have no choice but to abrogate some of our most fundamental freedoms. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, inconsiderate sad sacks. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. On this subject we get only a lot of blather and obfuscation from Krahmes and his sympathizers. No, scratch that. Let me instead make the much stronger claim that Krahmes's most steadfast claim is that it is his moral imperative to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, I correctly predicted that Krahmes would spread rumors, gossip, and stories that are unequivocally false. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon. Let me end this letter by pointing out that the battle to call for a return to the values that made this country great is now joined on many fronts. We will not waver; we will not tire; we will not falter; and we will not fail.
philo

climber
Dec 5, 2015 - 08:21am PT
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 5, 2015 - 08:49am PT
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 5, 2015 - 02:28pm PT
It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.

Ludvig von Mises
Norton

Social climber
Dec 5, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
HDDJ

those polls you showed above are national and not state specific

yet the Electoral College IS state specific, rendering national polls truly = useless
philo

climber
Dec 5, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
Tater in the tail pipe, motor no go.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 5, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
Hermit- If you really think capitalism and socialism are as practiced in the real world two distinct, separate things that people choose between then you are posting too much and thinking too little.
philo

climber
Dec 5, 2015 - 07:49pm PT
Putin announces Republican presidential campaign
Posted on December 2, 2015 by StubhillNews
putinshadesWASHINGTON D.C.— Responding to popularity among conservative pundits and on social media, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced he will run for the Republican presidential nomination.

“Your candidates are weak,” declared Putin, whose late arrival to the race did not prevent him from surging to the top of the polls.

“I will fix your mess,” said Putin between shots of vodka. “I will beat your problems into submission.”

He was received with a standing ovation and a roar of applause.

Putin responded to criticisms from the left that not being a born citizen of the United States was a disqualifying factor.

“No one thinks current president was America born,” said Putin while smashing an empty bottle of vodka on the ground. “Who cares? At least I’m not Muslim terrorist!”

According to poll analysis, Trump’s support, which hasn’t dipped below 20 percent in months, has virtually evaporated due to Putin’s entry to the race.

At press time, several Republican candidates’ bodies were found in dumpsters.

Follow Stubhill News on Twitter and Facebook for all the latest news

Share this:
TwitterFacebook10K+Google

Related
Donald Trump: Megyn Kelly a "bimbo," debate questioning a "typical woman move"
In "News"
Republican candidates defend young sex workers from regulation
In "News"
Trump refuses to apologize for allegedly insulting Ben Carson's "pissant" religion
In "Donald Trump"
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 5, 2015 - 09:59pm PT
In an update, those republicans in dumpsters claim they were looking for their constituents.
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 07:01am PT

Wow I did not know about Leo Penn. Huge respect to Sean Penns dad.
Huge shame on all Faux Patriots.




Sean Penn on His Blacklisted Dad: 'There Was No Loyalty'

by Sean Penn 11/19/2012 10:00am PST
In a guest piece for THR, the actor remembers the grace and dignity with which his father endured the harsh, damning wounds inflicted by an industry -- and a country -- that turned against him.

My father, Leo Penn, was a patriot to his core. The son of Spanish-Lithuanian immigrants, he was born in Lawrence, Mass., in 1921, a child of the Great Depression. His father moved the family to California on a Greyhound bus after finding work as an orange picker and later as a leather-goods maker in East Los Angeles. It was from the sloping foothills of City Terrace of the '30s and '40s, above the orange groves leading into the San Fernando Valley on one end and Chavez Ravine on the other, that my dad lived, firsthand, the great promise of America. Over the years, his father opened a bakery and came to whittle out a reasonable slice of middle-class life.

Then, as my father hit his late teens, came World War II. Underage but with youthful patriotic vigor, he tried to enlist with the Army infantry but was passed onto what was the Army Air Force when a doctor determined his feet were flat. My dad signed up to serve the United States and flew with a B-24 Liberator as a tail gunner and bombardier. Theirs were low-altitude night bombings over Germany's war machine. For these particular missions, an airman's average life expectancy was a total of seven sorties. At seven, these enlisted men flew on a volunteer basis only. My father's squad broke all records, volunteering to fly 37 missions in all -- 30 more than what was required. Shot down twice, his captain, Myron McNamara, was able to guide the damaged aircraft over Allied lines before my father and the entire crew parachuted to safety.

Leo Penn returned to the U.S. a highly decorated war veteran and began a burgeoning career in film and onstage. He played leading roles on Broadway and in Hollywood. Then, the sky fell. Based on his support of Hollywood trade unions, a commitment to the same social democracy that had been the legacy of President Franklin Roosevelt and his refusal to give names to the rising neo-Nazi-inspired House Committee on Un-American Activities, he was blacklisted by chicken hawks (among them Ronald Reagan) and barred from working in motion pictures by the same country for which he had risked his life those few short years earlier.

In fact, few among the Blacklist's principal architects ever risked career, much less life, in the defense of an American principle. And as with so many others, the country and the media stood by like frightened sheep. In the end, there was no loyalty for a soldier -- and no courage to cusp the pack of cowards and the ignorant disposition to identify with a popular lunacy. But the man I grew up with never showed bitterness. It seemingly was an effortless belief for him, that his great country simply had gone through a "bad stage" but that its foundation was never to be diminished, the flag was never not his own, and he never doubted it. He was a gentle and fair-minded man.

I remember as a kid walking down a beach path with my father as we stumbled upon the set of Elia Kazan's The Last Tycoon (1976). My father and Kazan had worked together and known each other before the Blacklist period. After all the years, Kazan recognized him and called out his name. It was the first time I ever witnessed my father ignore someone.

But, conversely, when the daughter of director Edward Dmytryk started a dog-grooming company in my hometown, I asked her to come by and see if she wanted to take care of my dogs when I left town. I mentioned this to my dad, and he immediately spoke well of her father. I asked, "Hadn't Edward Dmytryk also named names as Kazan had?" He said, "Yes, but not until he himself had done jail time for refusing to cooperate." Evidently, it was in jail where Dmytryk's view had shifted. What separated Kazan and Dmytryk, in my dad's assessment, was that what Dmytryk did, he did for his beliefs and following sacrifice -- as if considering him a perhaps hostile but loyal opposition nonetheless.

In Kazan's case, it was clear he had cowered and sold out himself and all those for whom he might otherwise have broken the Blacklist. Kazan was in an extraordinary position of influence, and he squandered it in shame. It took heroes like Kirk Douglas, years later, to finally break its back. My father often would say to me, "Everybody's got their own truth, kid." And that is true, though some remain untold, and unchallenged.

I will never forget at my father's funeral, as the honor guard passed the flag, folded into a meticulous triangle, over my lap to my mother beside me, stating, "In the name of the president of the United States, for his distinguished service." Indeed, it was distinguished. And so now is it our turn. We still sit silently while chicken hawks and bottle-blond and unsubtly augmented pundits sing cheap poison in best-selling books, bloated radio and skin-deep TV. Still today, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has yet to offer a clear acknowledgment of its own complicity in the shameful witch hunt of the 1950s that was the Blacklist. In the name of patriotism and patriots (most of whom would never have even asked for it) and in the name of our own dignity … it's time

In his 40 years in Hollywood, Sean Penn has won two Oscars and has been nominated for three more while serving as an outspoken political and social activist.

dirtbag

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 07:16am PT
Someone's been busy deleting this morning...
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 07:35am PT
I don't believe your premise. Perhaps the staunchest defenders of personal dogma won't change but others less entrenched can certainly process new information and make informed choices. I believe it is important to continue to speak to power.
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 07:42am PT
Why are you here then?
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 07:54am PT
So in light of your assertion do you think your commentry will effect change in anyone.
Sadly the fact that you only scan through theses threads before assuming a conclusion means you miss out on the occassional pearls of wisdom strewn before swine.
When a poster repeats a BS lie they need to be called on it. The same applies to the candidates for public office. Journalists shopuld not let these sociopaths spews lies without countering them with facts everytime.
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 08:02am PT
You know this forum has more than once been cited in articles in the NY Times right?
Do you get that some threads travel farther than your screen. RickA's threads about Lyin Ryan exposed the man's lies and scuttled his candidacy. Yes it does matter. Sorry that it doesn't for you.
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 08:11am PT
Read this and tell me why anyone not in the top 10% would vote for these reprehensible self serving maggots?



A Gift From Congress, to Congress

Congress is getting ready to give itself loads of extra campaign dollars again this holiday season.

The catchall spending bill scheduled for a vote by Dec. 11 is what’s known in Washington as a “Christmas tree”: legislation festooned with amendments that are gifts to legislators and their home districts, or that create new, ideologically based policy that has little to do with the bill’s purpose, which is funding the government. Now the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, and some House Republicans are reportedly planning to add four campaign finance riders to the $1.1 trillion bill’s already-groaning branches, hoping to help Republicans in elections next year.

Mr. McConnell has personally put forward the rider that would expand his colleagues’ campaign coffers. It would allow the National Republican Senatorial Committee and its Democratic counterpart to escape restrictions on expenditures they make in coordination with an individual candidate.

Under current law, a donor can give $2,700 to a candidate in a primary race and $2,700 for the general election. That same donor can also legally give $33,400 annually to a national party committee, like the Senate campaign committee. Federal law limits how much of that amount can be spent in coordination with a candidate. The new proposal would allow a candidate to solicit the $5,400 maximum from a donor, and then ask the same donor to give $33,400 to the party, which could then coordinate the spending of that entire amount with the candidate.

Photo

Senator Mitch McConnell Credit J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press
The other three riders seek to prevent President Obama or federal government agencies from taking steps to require fuller disclosure of contributions made by outside groups in federal elections.

One rider would prevent the president from issuing an executive order to require government contractors to disclose their campaign finance activities, as campaign finance watchdogs are urging him to do. Another would prevent the Securities and Exchange Commission from issuing new rules requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their campaign finance activities to shareholders. The third seeks to prevent the I.R.S. from issuing new regulations aimed at stopping so-called social welfare groups with 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status from functioning primarily as political campaign entities, not social welfare groups.

Campaign finance watchdogs worry that because the spending bill has so many higher-profile riders for legislators to fight over, the campaign finance amendments will slip through. And because they would channel more money to candidates of both parties, there is less will for halting them.

In a delicious bit of irony, Mr. McConnell needs Democratic support to pass his rider, because the Tea Party mavericks are opposing him. They say the extra cash would chiefly benefit establishment candidates, not Tea Party members, who are financed by super PACs and grass-roots donors outside the national party apparatus.

This week, more than 100 Democrats signed a letter announcing their intentions to oppose the campaign finance riders. The spending bill is the last legislation Congress will consider before lawmakers go home for the holiday recess. Democrats should do the right thing and strip these four bad riders from the bill.
philo

climber
Dec 6, 2015 - 11:43am PT
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 6, 2015 - 01:14pm PT
"Considering that no one ever changes their mind on these threads, why do you continue to post?"


Well, back & forths with ideologic opposites can be simply entertaining, and in a few unusual cases (i.e. John E) I actually learn a few things. As soon as you take this stuff too seriously, though, you're fooked.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 7, 2015 - 06:35am PT
Randisi posted
Hey, guys. Just dropped in to make sure everyone knows I don't read this thread and don't care what any of you have to say. I can't believe how much hate you guys are perpetuating. You're a pathetic joke. I'd never stoop to insulting people on a politics thread on the internet. Anyway, I'll just be somewhere else not posting in this thread or reading any of your responses because I'm so awesome.

In political news, Obama gave a speech from the Oval Office, only his third as President.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
philo

climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 07:01am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 10:53am PT
Please give me an example of this. [people changing their minds based on what was posted on ST]

No one reads these threads carefully except you guys. No one will ever read them again. Except perhaps some psychologist or sociologist, I suspect.

I completely changed my outlook on anthropogenic global warming based on posts (with citations to other material) from Chiloe.

I have no delusions about changing the minds of anyone. I post, in part, because I find debate stimulates the intellect, and in part because different perspectives may lead some to broaden their minds. Posting on a thread where everyone agrees strikes me as useless. Posting on one with substantial disagreement not only provides better entertainment, it sometimes teaches me something.

john
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 11:02am PT
I hate the "Free Lunch" analogy of John's

anything that sounds like a free lunch is automatically deemed bad and unsustainable

It sounds from your post that you misunderstand the "free lunch" concept. When people attack a "free lunch" in an argument, they say that the argument fails to account for the cost necessary to achieve the claimed result.

I agree with Craig that most regulation results because of dissatifcation with unregulated results. The problem with regulation is that there is no a priori reason to assume that regulation (which is necessarily imperfect) will be better than a lack of regulation (which is necessarily imperfect).

The typical argument for regulation says that the market fails because it imperfectly allocates goods or services. Therefore, we should regulate that market because the regulators will be able to allocate the goods and services better.

The "therefore" in the previous paragraph is a non-sequitur. What does it require for regulators to allocate good and services better? At the very least, it requires knowledge of the optimal allocation, and what means will bring that allocation about. The regulators aren't born with that knowledge. As most of us who work in a profession should know, knowledge isn't free. Only after we account for the cost of the regulation, and compare it with the cost of the lack of the regulation, can we make an intelligent decision.

Saying that the argument uses a "free lunch" merely says all of the above in a more compact way.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 7, 2015 - 11:19am PT
538 made a fun tool that will let you "unskew the polls" to imagine whatever electoral outcome you want!

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/



(Remember that guy? http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/unskewed-polls-founder-i-was-only-wrong-because-i-didn-t-consider-voter-fraud);



*edit* Oh, man. His website is now owned by some sort of german hair fetish company: http://unskewedpolls.com/

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 7, 2015 - 11:32am PT
Dayum!

[Click to View YouTube Video]
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 7, 2015 - 11:46am PT
Ya think???
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 11:59am PT
Ralph Peters sounds like a total pussy when you stack him up against Gen. Curtis LeMay.


I think there are many times when it would be most efficient to use nuclear weapons.
However, the public opinion in this country and throughout the world throw up their hands in horror when you mention nuclear weapons, just because of the propaganda that's been fed to them.
Gen. Curtis LeMay

( I think the horror had a little to do with the mass destruction of two Japanese cities, and maybe that the Soviets had them, too)


Plus, LeMay had that racism thing going for him the Donald finds so appealing.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 12:02pm PT
Lorenzo, I remember when LeMay was mentioned as a presidential candidate. Some speculated that his campaign slogan could be "Bombs Away with Curt LeMay."

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 12:07pm PT

He was the vice presidential candidate in George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 7, 2015 - 12:30pm PT
That's a sweet dildo.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 12:35pm PT
I remember that year's campaign, but he was mentioned as a Presidential nominee in early 1964, before Goldwater sewed up the nomination. The Republican nomination was up in the air that year until the California primary in June of 1964. I liked that pace a whole lot more than I like the pace currently, which seems to have nominations decided by mid-April at the latest.

The 1966 campaign in California was a lot more fun, with Wolfman Jack's campaign for Governor: "Don't vote left. Don't vote right. Vote wrong! Wolfman Jack for Governor."

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 12:46pm PT
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:00pm PT
Donald J. Trump called on Monday for the United States to bar all Muslims from entering the country until the nation’s leaders can “figure out what is going on,” an extraordinary escalation of his harsh rhetoric aimed at members of the Islamic faith in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif.
“Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine,” said Mr. Trump, the leading Republican candidate for his party’s 2016 presidential nomination.
“Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,” he said.


Um, Donald....maybe your rhetoric has something to do with whatever hatred you perceive.


Great plan, not withstanding that one of the shooters was born here, there is no legal statute that allows banning people by religion, and the constitution bars any laws regarding free exercise of religion ( or lack of it) being enacted.

Third Article:
Congress shall make no law establishing religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, nor shall the rights of Conscience be infringed.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:32pm PT
That would depend on the outcome of the next election.

It could be a shining moment in our history.

(Looking at Argentina Real Estate sites just in case)
Norton

Social climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:46pm PT
Well it sure looks like it is going to be Trump vs Clinton

and if so

a Landslide victory for Hillary Clinton and all the way down ticket Democrats

The Dems take back the US Senate, gain some seats in the House and Hillary
get 7-10 million more votes than Trump and wins by well over 100 Electoral Votes

and the Republicans learn absolutely nothing from it

never understanding that their base of angry old white males are dying off

and the new America of multi ethnic and much more educated population that
sees through their lies, racism and hate speech insures that we will not see a
Republican President again in our lifetimes, their days in the sun are over

Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:47pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

I'm not islamophobic.
I am afraid of people who want the death penalty for such things as apostasy, homosexuality, and adultry.
I want to know if my neighbors believe this sort of stuff.
If they believe that "God's Law" supersedes the laws of men.
The human race needs to grow out of superstitions, especially dangerous ones.

Edit: I also think Norton's analysis is spot on . . .
Norton

Social climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:50pm PT
Islam IS as peaceful a religion as Christianity

but extreme, radical Islam is not, and the world WILL ultimately defeat it

more and more nations are joining in together now to crush ISIS and its kind

Christianity during the butchering in god's name Crusades is the today's ISIS

Christians eventually grew up and stopped that sh!t

ISIS and its followers won't grow up, they have to be killed
WBraun

climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 02:56pm PT
If they believe that "God's Law" supersedes the laws of men.
The human race needs to grow out of superstitions, especially dangerous ones.

Gods law supersedes all the laws of mankind.

It's guaranteed YOU (life) will be kicked of your material body when your allotted breathes are finished (death).

There's no escape ......
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 03:00pm PT
Norton, I'd like to hear you respond to some of Mr. Watson's arguements.

Please view this clip first.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e9b_1421092375

^^^^Moderate Muslims supporting the death penalty for the 3 things I mentioned above.
Scary.

Happens all the time in Saudi Arabia, but they are our crack dealer, so we don't say anything . . .
dirtbag

climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 03:05pm PT
never understanding that their base of angry old white males are dying off

I think a lot of them understand this dilemma.

The problem is that if they embrace diversity they will be divided into a Conservative party that is pro-immigration and a Conservative party that opposes it (I.e., angry old white guys). Thats basically trump's threat this election if he deems the party to be acting unfairly and abandons it for a third party run. The vote would be split.

In the short run, i.e., the next several election cycles, I really don't know how they can walk out of the corner they have painted themselves into. They angry white guy base seems to be in no mood to compromise.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 7, 2015 - 03:39pm PT
Lorenzo, it is troubling that you cannot even quote the Constitution correctly!


Amendment I (1): Freedom of religion, speech, and the press; rights of assembly and petition

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press,
or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 03:42pm PT
The Donald keeps doubling down on The Hate.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-for-complete-shutdown-on-muslims-entering-us/ar-AAg86Ic?li=BBnb7Kz

I'm sure someone will try to defend him by saying that he is being misquoted or set up and "trapped" by the "liberal" media, or that he is so cute for saying such outrageous things.

How can anyone seriously consider this whacko for POTUS? He is the perfert tool for Daesh to start the apocalypse.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 03:59pm PT
Reeotch

I viewed the video of the "moderate" Muslims saying they support stoning-adultery

I get your point, but here is mine

there are some 1.5 BILLION Muslims world wide that emphatically do NOT "support" the extreme parts of the Koran, their Bible

the Muslims in the video can collectively be in a peer group and say they do but in
fact their actions speak otherwise, ie - they know damn well adultery is going on
and no one is getting stoned for it in Norway or here in the US, in fact there are
only a handful of places like Saudi Arabia, and some others that put in practice

my point is that one and half billion Muslims do not put into the practice the extreme parts of the Koran just as Christians no longer rape, murder stone and enslave
as commanded to do so in the Bible

IF the point you are trying to make is that "all" Muslims or even a majority should be feared as terrorists then you are in a very small group that buys that notion

or maybe that is not your point?
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 04:42pm PT
Ok lets talk about hate vs. tolerance (or intolerance)

I believe there some beliefs that are not compatible with American society. I don't know enough to paint all muslims with that brush.
It is the specific little dictums from this and other religions (such as mormonism) that scare me. Many of these beliefs are not publicized very much because they know it is unacceptable in the USA.
Why do we allow those disgusting FLDS pedophile polygamists in Colorado City to continue to enslave and rape underage girls?
Religious tolerance?
I would welcome any muslims who truly want to come here and become Muslim Americans, but we don't need them to come here and stay seperate from the rest of society. That is what is happening in Europe right now. They're going to end up in Islamic ghettos.
In Sweeden now there is an epidemic of gang rape of girls carried out by gangs of imigrants who are used to getting away with such behavior in their home countries.
We have different standards of behavior.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:19pm PT
Dick Cheney just weighed in on Trumps idea to ban Muslims.

He basically said it was un-American, that all sorts of people came here for religious freedom.

Then, as an example, he cited his own family.


He said they were Puritans and came here before anybody was here.



Close....so close....
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:23pm PT
I believe there some beliefs that are not compatible with American society.

Doesn't the society get to weigh in? How about the bill of rights? Are you un-American?
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:24pm PT
Ho man, don't get me started on the Puritans . . .

". . . white and delightsome . . ."
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:33pm PT
Lorenzo, I thought our society was moving away from things like the subjugation of women, homophobia (death penalty if yer gay, now that's some serious homophobia)stoning of adulteresses (but not the men), how about involuntary female genital mutilation?
(I know, its a "cultural" thing we are so narrow minded here in America we just cant accept anybody but an angry old white christian dude. We really need to spice it up.)
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:45pm PT
Lorenzo, I thought our society was moving away from things like the subjugation of women, homophobia (death penalty if yer gay, now that's some serious homophobia)stoning of adulteresses (but not the men), how about involuntary female genital mutilation?
(I know, its a "cultural" thing we are so narrow minded here in America we just cant accept anybody but an angry old white christian dude. We really need to spice it up.)

Here's An idea.


How about you spend a year or two reading the Quran and finding out where it says anything Genital mutilation and subjugation of women? The actual verses in the Quran are more about equality than the teachings of Paul, for instance. Love to get into it with you about that. The bible says it's OK to sell your daughter into slavery.

Then look in the Christian or Jewish bibles and give me quotes on tolerance for gays ( chapter and verse)

The bible as official word of God does actually prescribe stoning for adultery. Jesus challenges that prescription, not by condemning the scripture, but by questioning the Pharisees.

( John 8:7) " let he among you who is without sin...."


If you want to talk about tribal societies, that's one thing. But the Quran?

Read it first then get back to me.

Comparative analysis is great fun.


The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:48pm PT
Latino wanna-be telling a White Doood all about the Quran. ^^^^^^^^^^^


Priceless.






Only on ST.


RFLMAO!!!!!!
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:48pm PT
Go back to sleep, chief.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:49pm PT
And miss out on your prolific insistent stooooopidity?


Not a fking chance wanna-be Latino Lorenzo. Not a fking chance.






apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:54pm PT
Chief sports a Jon Stewart gif?

A closet liberal!

BBBBUUUUURRRRRNNNNNNN HHHIIIIIIMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!619
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:56pm PT
C'mon, you know as well as I do about where women stand in Saudi Arabia for example.
Listen, I'm not here to compare religions (a.k.a. superstitions). We need to get past all this religious dogma stuff. Christians are all over the map, it totally depends on what church you go to.
In all cases, though, when these religions degenerate into what is called fundamentalism they become dangerous. Better to just avoid institutionalized religion in any form.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 08:59pm PT

Well it sure looks like it is going to be Trump vs Clinton

and if so

a Landslide victory for Hillary Clinton
It will be a landslide for Hillary no matter wh she faces


I am afraid of people who want the death penalty for such things as apostasy, homosexuality, and adultry.

Ted Cruz and his ilk.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:01pm PT
Suit herself, but you'll have to do put down your Bushmaster and do some reading to keep up.
Careful, there are lots of Muslims in the bushes.



BTW, have you blown up any Girl Scouts with your Claymoor mines on motion timers?

The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:02pm PT
Is that Stewart? Shet!


Hmmmmmm.... I was interested in the popcorn.



Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:04pm PT
I sure hope Western Illinois gets it right again. Bernie is the only person I would feel even remotely comfortable with.

I just don't see it happening though, unless Hillary self destructs. But she seems to be made of teflon.
philo

climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:12pm PT
Western Illinois University has successfully predicted every single presidential election with 100 percent accuracy since 1975. They’ve completed their mock election for the 2016 presidential field and according to their calculations, the 45th President of The United States will be…


President Bernie Sanders

They also predict that President Sanders’ vice president will be Sen. Martin O’Malley (D-MD).
These calculations may not surprise very many people. From Hollywood A-list celebrities, top musicians, millennials, veterans, and even a few disgruntled Republicans, people across America #FeelTheBern. Researchers believe Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is the single “most electable candidate” from either party.

High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:13pm PT
Careful there, Reeo. You're sounding a lot like HFCS.

1. C'mon, you know as well as I do about where women stand in Saudi Arabia for example.

2. Listen, I'm not here to compare religions (a.k.a. superstitions). We need to get past all this religious dogma stuff. Christians are all over the map, it totally depends on what church you go to.

3. In all cases, though, when these religions degenerate into what is called fundamentalism they become dangerous. Better to just avoid institutionalized religion in any form.

Amen, Compadre.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:16pm PT
your Bushmaster ...

Nope Latino wanna-be. No "Bushmaster" here. That's a Kmart piece of shet wep.



Only the Best for this psychopath gun nut...




High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:29pm PT
Just read your post to Reeo, Norton, previous page.

If you think the majority of these 1.5B Muslims have moved past traditional fundamentalism as Christians in US have, well I'm sorry, you're mistaken.

If suddenly all American Christians were replaced head for head with an equal number of world Muslims, Arab to Persian to Eastern - an interesting experiment to be sure - we'd have Sharia within the year and no science as we know it (let alone evolution) in our schooling systems.

I am as concerned about fundamentalist Muslims as I am Islamist Muslims - if not more - because their numbers are so much greater and Islamic influence on a culture extends far beyond terrorism. At risk from this influence... proportional to the numbers of course... law, politics, education, arts and sciences, equity feminism, etc. as we know them.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:31pm PT

Sorry chief. Doesn't do anything for me.

I'm sure the front of your pants are all moist, though.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 7, 2015 - 09:37pm PT
It should. But whatever.




Why would my pants be "moist" Latino wanna-be Lorenzo? I've owned and regularly shot that wep for over 12 years now.


And you're lecturing REO on the Quran.


Priceless as usual.

Carry on...


JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 7, 2015 - 10:16pm PT
What a difference a few hours makes on this thread. When I last saw it, it was starting to approach rational discussion. Sad to say, I've read a whole lot of bigoted nonsense posted since. I particularly scratch my head over the thought that Islam would end "science as we know it." If so, how did the Pakistanis get nuclear weapons, and how is Iran doing the same? By mystic incantations?

There is an enormous difference between the run-of-the-mill Syrian, say, who was generally a well-educated member of the middle class before the chaos hit, and an ISIS or Wahhabist fanatic. Ask the typical Syrian refugee how much they'd like to be governed by Sharia law, and I suspect their answer would approximate that of the typical Armerican. Well, except that the Syrian would know what Sharia law is. The American would need to consult his or her television.

The slander of Christianity is just as bad. Those commenting the most have yet to demonstrate a familiarity with either orthodox Biblical doctrine or any of the tenets of what has defined "Fundamentalism" for at least 100 years. They simply lump together every angry person who purports to be a Christian as a "radical" or "fundamental" Christian, ignoring (or, more likely, ignorant of) e.g., Matt. 7:21 "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter."

That said, there is nothing unconstitutional or un-American about recognizing that adherents to a particular religion in a particular place face persecution, and giving such a person preference in seeking asylum over someone who is not endangered by his or her religious beliefs. And it's obviously more likely that a Jihadist will be a nominal Muslim, so a rational government policy would look for Jihadists among Muslims, not among Buddhists.

None of this changes my disdain for Trump. If he gets the nomination, he will inflict disaster on the Republican party, probably making it irrelevant nationally for years to come. Judging by the actions of California Republicans since Tom Kuchel lost the primary to Max Rafferty in 1968, I have little hope that we'll chose relevance over being crybabies.

John
BLUEBLOCR

Social climber
joshua tree
Dec 7, 2015 - 10:25pm PT
^^^^Nice one John:)


Lorenzo said;

The bible says it's OK to sell your daughter into slavery.

The bible as official word of God does actually prescribe stoning for adultery. Jesus challenges that prescription, not by condemning the scripture, but by questioning the Pharisees.

jus so i can better understand where your comin from.

Do you understand the difference between the New, and the Old testaments?
Do you know the difference between a Jew and a Christian?
And why do you imagine Jesus questioned the Pharisees instead of say, just laying down a new revised law?

Also is it of your opinion that if the Bible say's it's ok to sell your daughter into slavery, that this practice is ok to a christian?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 06:53am PT
"a whole lot of bigoted nonsense" lol

So criticism of the iron-age superstitions of Abrahamic religion whether C or I is bigotry? bigoted nonsense?

A lot of readers see beyond the rhetoric.

Why don't you review fundamentalism and fundamentalist. Here, I'll help you out...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism

Are you suggesting the Muslim world isn't any more fundamentalist than the Christian world? Are you suggesting some input of Muslims into a culture wouldn't have an influence - indeed a religious fundamentalist influence - on that culture? On its government, its policies, its laws, its communities, its public schooling?


There's a great deal more to science and science education than ability to make a nuclear bomb for chrisakes.

Perhaps if you had 20 plus years of science education as a naturalist you'd have a more compelling reason to see through the nonsense of the truth-claims of the the Abrahamic religions.

Beliefs matter. Beliefs are not inconsequential. Of course this includes the iron-aged beliefs of Christianity and Islam, Islam and Christianity. What is a shame is that though this is the 21st century more people don't get this cognitively and attitudinally and more people don't raise this issue. But now that we've entered the social media age maybe this will change. In fact maybe that's what we are all witness to and participating in currently. We can only hope.

EXTRA CREDIT Just what percentage of the Islamic world would you guess (1) supports evolutionary "theory." 5%, 20%, 50%?

Call me an "alarmist" and biased but in my book anything less than 50% in this age is a problem particularly if they're making law and policy in my community.

Unf, I gotta go now.




PS... Look at the bright side though, appears you have Blu on your side.

PS2... There's a difference between (a) science and (b) science as we know it. I wrote the latter. Watch the rhetoric, sloppy writing, etc.
philo

climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 07:54am PT
Soldier Expresses His True Feelings In This Open Letter To All Muslims
By Kristie on December 7, 2015
Categories: Media, Religion, War


Optimized by Komoona
2308
SHARES
FacebookTwitterSubscribe




It seems that Muslims are in the middle of their own personal war in America. On one hand, there is fear that all Muslims are to be scrutinized, as they could be Islamic extremists. On the other hand, the majority of Muslims just want to be free to worship, work, and care for their families.

Photo used with permission from David Swan.
Photo used with permission from David Swan. Swan is fourth from the left.

So when U.S. Army soldier David Swan posted his own thoughts titled, “Dear Muslims,” it was quite the revelation and perspective that should cross all political boundaries. Both Democrats and Republicans can take something away from this soldier’s thoughts.

After reading his extremely honest thoughts regarding Muslims, I had to ask him why he wrote what he did. Swan responded by saying:

“I wrote it for a few reasons. There is so much divisive rhetoric being shouted on social and traditional media, that I feel like the “reasonable people” are just choosing to remain silent because they don’t even want to be a part of the conversation anymore. The problems of this world are much more complicated than oversimplified snarky memes and talking head pundits. I felt that most people find themselves in the “middle” of these issues and that voice needs to be heard more than ever.”

With that said, here is the post that everyone needs to read:

“Dear Muslims,

I am an American, a Christian, and a US Army Soldier. I’m white, I grew up in the South, and I love Jesus, as well as the life of freedom and prosperity that my country has enabled me to have. I have fought in Iraq and lost several really good friends there.

I don’t hate you. I don’t fear you. I don’t want you to leave this country. I want to know you, your heart, your struggles, and your joys. I want to have you over to my house for barbecues. I want our children to be friends and play in the back yard together. I want you to join my fantasy football league. I want to give you crap and make fun of you for not picking Marshawn Lynch in the first round of the draft when you had the opportunity. I want you to give me crap when it turns out that you were right, because Marshawn Lynch kind of sucks this year. I want share mutual respect with you.

We share a common enemy in the radical Islamist. They want to drive us apart and to fear each other. They want your children to grow up hating my children. They want you to believe our way of life is evil and that we must be punished for it. They produce a barrage of internet propaganda aimed at isolating your children from those not like them in an attempt to recruit them to do evil on their behalf. Every terrorist attack against innocent people in this world is an attack against peace and normalcy. It’s designed to stir a violent response from those attacked and create more hatred between “us and them.”

Sadly, it’s working. It is producing the full range of human fear responses toward Arab-looking people — from a subtle sense of suspicion and unease communicated with sideways glances at each other on the street, to full-scale Islamophobia and racism. I want to believe that we, as Christians, could follow the example of Christ and show love to you as well as your people suffering through this refugee crisis in Syria by opening our homes and communities to you. We are failing at this because of the fear and distrust our enemies are willfully creating. This growing divide between our cultures makes recruiting more disaffected Muslim youth even easier for them.

To anyone reading this letter…Christians, Muslims, Jews, Atheist, or whatever. We simply cannot let them win. We can’t allow them to make us hate each other. Fear and hate are their most effective weapons and we must neutralize them in order to break the cycle. If you truly want peace, I challenge you to befriend someone “on the other side.” Let’s have a joint Church/Mosque cookout in a park where our kids can chase each other around and argue over who gets to be Elsa, Anna, Kristoff, and Prince Hans. We need to learn about each other’s lives and differences. I believe we will find that there aren’t as many differences as one might think. We all want to make a living, raise our families in a safe place, and live in peace.

Unfortunately, there are some wolves out there that will not stop killing sheep until they are put down. Please do not blame us for using our staff to protect the flock. Please know that when it comes to terrorism, I consider all peace loving people part of the flock, regardless of race, religion, or nationality. That includes you, of course. War is hell but as Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

If there happen to be any Muslims reading this that have already been radicalized, I feel sorry for you. You have bought into a lie. You have been promised a glory for your actions that does not exist. We take no joy in killing you, but we will do it because you have forced our hand. We will reduce the Islamic State to an impotent and ineffective shell of what it once was just as we have with Al Qaeda. The world will not know your names, but your families will undoubtedly mourn your loss. May God have mercy on your souls.

Respectfully,

DS”

Lastly, Swan told me this:

“The goals of our enemies are to divide us, spread fear and hate, and instigate global chaos. We, as individuals, can’t do much about geopolitics. But we can love each other and break down these walls our enemies are building between us. And maybe, just maybe, doing so may restore some faith between fellow humans and protect a few disenfranchised Muslims from buying into this radical ideology.”


climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:08am PT
^so well said.

Every time Trump opens his mouth is a win for Daesh.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:08am PT
Here's the Senate's Lead Liberal Democrat in action...


By Alexander Bolton - 12/07/15 09:16 PM EST

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is kicking up a storm with liberals in his caucus by pushing an amendment to the government funding bill that would help Caesars Entertainment Corporation, a Nevada-based gaming giant in danger of bankruptcy.

Reid is pushing to add a provision to the year-end omnibus that would help Caesars avoid bankruptcy by allowing it to restructure debt incurred by a subsidiary out of court, according to Senate and K Street sources.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/262391-reid-rankles-dems-with-push-for-casino-rider-in-funding-bill


What a piece of sneaky bought out shet!
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:10am PT
^^Yeah cause it would be so good for Nevada if Caesars goes Bankrupt unnecessarily. Such a horrible thing to be able to restructure debt out of court at no cost to taxpayers...what an evil Senator Reid is.

Ok sarcasm off...Glad we have a professional doing his job on our side here in Nevada.

Are you sure you know what a Senators job is?
WBraun

climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:14am PT
So .... the mob is going bankrupt?

hahaha ..... and the criminal Senator is in business with them
dirtbag

climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:22am PT
Trump effectively points out the thinking and philosophy that led to Japanese internment camps in the US during WWII is alive as ever. There are millions of voters who's fears can be exploited by the right politician.

Many of Trump's supporters have openly compared these proposals favorably to what happened to the Japanese during WWII as necessities taken during wartime.

This country has always had a fascist streak, it just hadn't been displayed this openly for quite awhile.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 8, 2015 - 09:38am PT
HFCS posted
If suddenly all American Christians were replaced head for head with an equal number of world Muslims, Arab to Persian to Eastern - an interesting experiment to be sure - we'd have Sharia within the year and no science as we know it (let alone evolution) in our schooling systems.

Thank goodness religion has never been a barrier to scientific progress in this country! Or that Christians don't insist that law or education be made to reflect the Bible.

philo posted
Western Illinois University has successfully predicted every single presidential election with 100 percent accuracy since 1975. They’ve completed their mock election for the 2016 presidential field and according to their calculations, the 45th President of The United States will be…

Bernie is a very powerful voice for his issues and a very authentic character in many ways, but his scope is far too narrow to be an effect President. Additionally, he clearly knows that his core message, the thing that makes liberals excited about him, has no chance of going anywhere without a massive groundswell of support that carries far beyond the actual election. Obama, a far more widely appealing candidate and a better overall communicator, got completely stymied by Congress. Without a total sea change that radically changes the makeup of the House, we shouldn't expect anything different.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 09:49am PT
Thank goodness religion has never been a barrier to scientific progress in this country! Or that Christians don't insist that law or education be made to reflect the Bible.

I don't understand. Isn't that MY point?

Maybe you don't know my position on Abrahamic religion?

Or maybe I am mis-reading?

Anyways thanks for the opportunity to make the point, or points, once again.

Thank goodness religion has never been a barrier to scientific progress in this country! Or that Christians don't insist that law or education be made to reflect the Bible. -hddj

If you think C culture with its level of fundamentalism is bad, outdated, retro, an obstacle to greater enlightenment, anti-science, anti-education, whatever, I culture with its level is/would be ten times more intense. That was the point. Everybody should get that. But obviously they don't.

Instead of one Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson claiming AIDS is God Jehovah's punishment, there could be 10. Instead of one Liberty University putting out fundamentalist lawyers to rep pro-life, there could be ten. That was the point.

C religion in the English speaking world has already endured much in the way of growing pains over the last few hundred years, moderated by countless nonreligious institutions and pressures, everything from science to democracy to rock n roll to Hollywood to bikinis. Islamic religion esp in the Arab ME has had no such oppo relatively speaking. It's yet to endure a couple hundred years of reformation and growing pains. Hence it's a lot more fundamentalist in net percentage.

To be clear, I'm all for Syrian immigration of refugees as long as they've been rigorously vetted (e.g. question: 'I am not Muslim, I am an infidel. Am I your enemy?') I've posted nothing suggesting otherwise. The entire development is a tragedy. But don't fool yourselves: Insofar as fundamentalist Muslims immigrate to US you should expect a commensurate Islamic fundamentalist influence in its communities including its public edu systems and you should expect less consensus and more dissention over basics. Is that what we want?
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 8, 2015 - 10:41am PT
S
EXTRA CREDIT Just what percentage of the Islamic world would you guess (1) supports evolutionary "theory." 5%, 20%, 50%?

Not sure if you are for or against evolutionary theory,

But a poll has been done in the USA. Muslims are bracketed by Christians.
The greatest support for the concept appears among Athiests, Buddists, and Hindu.

The whole USA population stands at 48% , Muslims at 45%.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution


Since not all Americans are Christian, my guess, which you asked for, is that there isn't much difference between Christians and Muslims. What's your guess?

Throughout the World, It's not as incompatible as you imagine, and runs about the same gamut it does in Christian thought.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_evolution

A 2007 study of religious patterns found that only 8% of Egyptians, 11% of Malaysians, 14% of Pakistanis, 16% of Indonesians, and 22% of Turks agree that Darwin's theory is probably or most certainly true, and a 2006 survey reported that about 25% of Turkish adults agreed that human beings evolved from earlier animal species. In contrast, the 2007 study found that only 28% of Kazakhs thought that evolution is false.[21]

According to a more recent Pew study these numbers appear to increase slowly but steadily. For instance, a relatively large fraction of people accept human evolution in Kazakhstan (79%) and Lebanon (78% for college students), but relatively few in Afghanistan (26%), Iraq (27%), and Pakistan (30%), with most of the other Islamic countries somewhere in between.[24]

Kazakstan is 70% Muslim. The USA is 70.6% Christian.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 11:06am PT
Yes Lorenzo, I am a "science type" here and my background is full-on science including evolutionary "theory."

Good on Kazakhstan!

Hopefully it can serve as something of a role model then for its neighbors.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 8, 2015 - 11:54am PT
HFCS- I was being sarcastic. Very, very sarcastic.


Chuck wants everyone to know that planes are not guns. Or that not planes are not guns. Or something.

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:13pm PT

Dec 8, 2015 - 11:06am PT
Yes Lorenzo, I am a "science type" here and my background is full-on science including evolutionary "theory."

Good on Kazakhstan!

Hopefully it can serve as something of a role model then for its neighbors.


Well, if you are a science guy, you might rather hope that Kazakstan would be a role model for USA Christians, then.

Iwent to the Pew research center to view what I could of the actual polls and data, and they are available in PDF form if you wish to view them.

http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/12/Evolution-12-30.pdf

Includes the same polling data for Christians in America. Chart on page 8.
It also polls Republicans/democrats/ independents.

The site http://www.pewresearchcenter.org/religion is a great site and includes an interactive that divides the USA regionally. There are marked differences. ( no surprise)


The 2013 data for Muslims around the word for basically the same questions on evolution , and for other Muslim attitudes is here:
http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf

Section on evolution and chart on page 132

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
Lorenzo, there is a problem with your chart that documents what various faiths think, in believing evolution:

What happens when there is a disagreement with the doctrine, and what individuals poll? Where does the number go?

For example, with Catholics, the doctrine is that evolution is correct---that is official, as pronounced by two Popes. But apparently many "catholics" don't agree with the official doctrine. Are they Catholic? What do you put down as "what Catholics believe"???
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:18pm PT
HFCS,

Your bigotry against adherents of "Abrahamic Religions" was, indeed in my cross-hairs, so to speak. How many practicing Christians, Muslims or Jews do you know that have a Ph.D. in a scientific discipline? For that matter, how many practicing Christians, Muslims or Jews do you know? I ask because I question the sources of your conclusions about them and their practice of science.

For that matter, how does the practice of "science as we know it" differ from the practice of science? Doesn't your distinction require that the practice of "science as we know it" consist of something other than the practice of science? Put another way, your reply to my last comments requires that the "practice of science as we know it" be unscientific.

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
Ken M:
Ae you referring to the Wikipedia chart? Or the ones in the pdf's I just posted? I think Wikipedia is based on the PDF's ( older versions)
I don't pretend the charts have all the answers, but as I read the charts in the pdf's, they compare two extremes of thought. Note the numbers don't add up to 100%
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:23pm PT
Lorenzo, that's fair, and I'm not meaning to contradict your conclusions---really just pointing out that this is pretty complicated stuff, and it's not always easy to find a clean conclusion.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:25pm PT
Agreed. Which is why I get a bit combative when people spout absolutes.

The poll on Christianity include a section on, if you believe a form of evolution, is it divinely inspired/guided?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:30pm PT
Your bigotry...

Pretty strong language there.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vln9D81eO60

"It's gross, it's racist!"

lol
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:42pm PT
Your bigotry...

Pretty strong language there.

Yes, it is. I don't do that lightly. I hope I'm misreading you, but your posts on Abrahamic religions seem to dump all adherents into one pot, which becomes the target of intolerant condemnation. If that isn't bigotry, then the definition changed a very short time ago.

John
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:46pm PT
You believe in God Jesus, isn't that right?

It's "God Jesus" for you, correct?

How's that for specificity?

.....

Your bigotry... j zarian

"Yes, it is. I don't do that lightly." -j zarian

For the record, I owe you one.

(At my choosing, of course.)

btw, I always get a kick when a religious person uses the word bigot or bigotry against someone who is NOT religious or theistic. The kick is from the irony of it. You should research its etymology sometime.

.....

your posts on Abrahamic religions seem to dump all adherents into one pot -j zarian

Well it's the nature of language and thought. Sometimes by necessity one must speak generally, other times one must speak specifically. But anyone who knows my views knows how incorrect your statement is, how little you apparently know me. Just earlier somewhere I referred to "fundamentalist Muslims" and "reform muslims" and "liberal muslims" and "secular muslims" and "Islamists". I don't know, seems pretty nuanced to me.

One more time...
your posts on Abrahamic religions seem to dump all adherents into one pot -j zarian

So give me a buju to go climbing in the sierra with instead of a syrian or albanian islamist any day!
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:54pm PT
Bernie is a very powerful voice for his issues and a very authentic character in many ways, but his scope is far too narrow to be an effect President. Additionally, he clearly knows that his core message, the thing that makes liberals excited about him, has no chance of going anywhere without a massive groundswell of support that carries far beyond the actual election. Obama, a far more widely appealing candidate and a better overall communicator, got completely stymied by Congress. Without a total sea change that radically changes the makeup of the House, we shouldn't expect anything different.

exactly
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:55pm PT
From the Online Etymological Dictionary:

1590s, "sanctimonious person, religious hypocrite," from French bigot (12c.), which is of unknown origin. Earliest French use of the word is as the name of a people apparently in southern Gaul, which led to the now-doubtful, on phonetic grounds, theory that the word comes from Visigothus. The typical use in Old French seems to have been as a derogatory nickname for Normans, the old theory (not universally accepted) being that it springs from their frequent use of the Germanic oath bi God. But OED dismisses in a three-exclamation-mark fury one fanciful version of the "by god" theory as "absurdly incongruous with facts." At the end, not much is left standing except Spanish bigote "mustache," which also has been proposed but not explained, and the chief virtue of which as a source seems to be there is no evidence for or against it.

In support of the "by God" theory, as a surname Bigott, Bygott are attested in Normandy and in England from the 11c., and French name etymology sources (such as Dauzat) explain it as a derogatory name applied by the French to the Normans and representing "by god." The English were known as goddamns 200 years later in Joan of Arc's France, and during World War I Americans serving in France were said to be known as les sommobiches (see also son of a bitch). But the sense development in bigot is difficult to explain. According to Donkin, the modern use first appears in French 16c. This and the earliest English sense, "religious hypocrite," especially a female one, might have been influenced by beguine and the words that cluster around it. Sense extended 1680s to other than religious opinions.

You realize that your views on Abrahamic religion are, in fact, a religion of its own?

Yes, I am an othodox Christian, one of the tenets of which is that Jesus is God. Did my post condemn all other religious adherents, or merely those who were intolerant of the rights of others to disagree?

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 8, 2015 - 12:57pm PT
If the Republicans nominate Trump, Bernie has a real chance. Even I, who think his views are crazy (see hasty post from last week) would vote for him over Trump.

John

High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 01:02pm PT
So Counselor, by what theory of how the world works or (b) by what theory of how life works does the historical Jesus (assuming he existed at all) get to be God of the Universe... Born of a Virgin... and by what theory did he rise from the dead and ascend into heaven on the 3rd day (or was it the fifth).

Yes, I am an othodox Christian... j zarian

Here's a thought...

It's the 21st century now. Consider no longer defining yourself tribally based on imaginary fictitious ideas.

Just because your grandparents did doesn't mean you have to. Who knows, if they had access to the information you do, perhaps they wouldn't have.
Just a thought.

Maybe if millions around the world took the above "beta" to heart, there would be less sectarian violence and it would be a better more peaceful place.

Have you ever questioned your 2,000 year old beliefs? If no, am I the only one at this choss pile who is bothered by that?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 8, 2015 - 01:02pm PT
Bernie would be a shoo-in with a Trump nomination. Neither of those things is going to happen though.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 8, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
Neither of those things is going to happen though.

Boy, I hope you're right - at least with respect to Trump.

HFCS, If we engage in a religious debate, should we do so on the "religion vs. science" thread?

By what theory did Jesus perform His miracles? By demonstrating that He is God, who controls the universe (rather more clearly than, say the Ruler of the Universe in The Restuarant At The End Of The Universe.) If he merely existed following normal physical observations, how would the miracles be a "sign" of anything?

Why has no one duplicated His feats? Because they are not God.

John

Edit: Of course I've questioned my religious beliefs, as have, I suspect, most sentient adults. I came to faith as an adult, not as a child, because of personal experience, and despite detesting Christianity and Christians for most of my prior life. Again, though, I don't see that as the issue on this thread. To the extent it involves politics at all, it involves calls from candidates for POTUS like Trump that we keep all Muslims out of the country, which is something I find reprehensible.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 01:16pm PT
"Why has no one duplicated His feats? Because they are not God." -j lazian

Straight up weakness. Weakness of mind. Sorry.

And that ain't bigotry either, rather it's just identification of the problem in problem solving.

Learn to think straight when it comes to belief. I know you do so in other venues of life. Religion or theism shouldn't be any exception. Yet it is for you and umpteen million others like you.

Thank goodness it won't be for today's smart young people growing up in this age of social media, change and global awareness.


.....

re: weakness

It's as if you're not aware we live in the 21st century now in a global environment many millions (and growing) aware of our history over thousands to millions of years.

"Why has no one duplicated His feats? Because they are not God."

It's as if you're not aware standards have changed. They are new and higher now at least among the scientifically literate and educated (notwithstanding your anecdotes you have at the ready apparently).

"Because they are not God" might have been an effective answer in Belvue KS 100 years ago and yes sadly even among some today but it's as if you don't know how absolutely absurd that answer is today from a modern global historical perspective.

Time to add an eye of newt to my stew now, got a go. And I have an exorcism at 2pm. (Learned about that in ecology.) Later. But it's been fun.

Again, no bigotry here. Just the criticism of bad ideas - some very bad - that have been institutionalized over centuries and then foisted on the masses. Our species can do much better when it gets past them. And I believe it will. Perhaps not all of it - and obviously it's going to take some time - but enough of it.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 01:43pm PT
If the Republicans nominate Trump, Bernie has a real chance. Even I, who think his views are crazy (see hasty post from last week) would vote for him over Trump.

John

Sanders has to get past Hillary first.

My problems with Sanders are, 1) how does he pay for his entitlement programs? Does he plan to tax the one percenters to the max? They will move their assets offshore.
2) he is too old. He will be seventy-five by the time next november rolls around.
philo

climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 04:37pm PT
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Dec 8, 2015 - 05:52pm PT

My problems with Sanders are, 1) how does he pay for his entitlement programs?

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2013/01/02/cost-overruns-jet-should-prompt-pentagon-reassess-project/gYZy0N40hTEnRXwcEJlc3K/story.html
But the F-35 proved to be neither cheap nor adaptable. It is now the most costly weapons program in history. The Pentagon is projected to spend $396 billion on nearly 2,500 planes...

Apparently, the F-35 is not allowed to fly in the dark, or in the rain. It also can't carry its weapons. At least it doesn't asphyxiate its pilots like the F-22.

http://fortune.com/2015/11/04/new-stealth-bomber-program-faces-tightening-budgets/
At a projected $511 million per aircraft...
Uh, huh. Believe that do ya?

http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/2015/10/20/mccain-slams-cost-overruns-ford-class-carriers-outrageous/74000008/

The latest confrontation began Oct. 1, when the chairman of the Senate Armed Service Committee, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the Ford-class carrier program “one of the most spectacular acquisition debacles in recent memory.” The committee demanded to know what went wrong and who was accountable, with the first-in-class Gerald R. Ford now estimated to cost $12.9 billion — $2.4 billion over its initial price tag.

Which navy are we so threatened by?
http://alltoptens.com/top-ten-naval-forces-in-the-world/
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 8, 2015 - 06:18pm PT
Gary, you did not address the age issue. Raygun was in his '70s when he was president, and we see out that turned out.

Personally, I don't think anyone older than retirement age, sixty-seven, should be allowed to run for president.
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Dec 8, 2015 - 06:26pm PT
70 is the new 50! Besides, Sanders shows no sign of senility, unlike the Gipper.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:07pm PT


"Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don’t believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos’n Mate. Now I live in a “rest home” located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can’t figure out what country you are the president of.
You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

” We’re no longer a Christian nation”
” America is arrogant”

– (Your wife even
announced to the world,” America is mean-spirited. ” Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our
war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.)

I’d say shame on the both of you, but I don’t think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said,” America hasn’t lived up to her ideals.”

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I hope you didn’t mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don’t think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don’t, I’ll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don’t want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don’t mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don’t want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you’re the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you’re not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you’re thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.
You’re not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That’s not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.
And I sure as hell don’t want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle…

Sincerely,
Harold B. Estes
BMCM USN(RET)

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 8, 2015 - 08:10pm PT
Lost a great MOH recipient today. Screwed for decades by a NCO, but what do you expect?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/tibor-teddy-rubin-who-received-medal-of-honor-for-one-man-assault-in-korea-dies-at-86/2015/12/08/601402d2-9dc3-11e5-a3c5-c77f2cc5a43c_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-national%3Ahomepage%2Fcard

“Teddy” Rubin, as Tibor became known, largely avoided talking about World War II and Korea. But in the 1980s, he attended a reunion of veterans, where he reconnected with members of his unit. They expressed shock that he had not received the Medal of Honor.

He was told that he had been nominated four times by his grateful comrades — efforts, it emerged, that had been blocked by the sergeant.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 8, 2015 - 09:12pm PT
Screwed for decades by a NCO, but what do you expect?

A "Buck" Sgt has far more power in Operational and Administrative rank than a Capt (OIC) or Colonel (CO) who should have initially written, pre-approved and forwarded the original Citation per the US ARMY Military Awards Manual Army Regulation 600–8–22?

Amazing.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 9, 2015 - 07:29am PT
Laying down a blanket age maximum for office is not acceptable. We have elections and being President requires more fitness and stamina now than ever. Covering up an ailing President is no easy task.




Once again, The Onion is prescient:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 9, 2015 - 10:22am PT
Your racist link for the day: Scalia: Affirmative Action Sends Blacks To Schools Too Advanced For Them

In the oral arguments Wednesday for a Supreme Court affirmative action case, Justice Antonin Scalia—a well known critic of affirmative action—suggested that the policy was hurting minority students by sending them to schools too academically challenging for them.

Referencing an unidentified amicus brief, Scalia said that there were people who would contend "that it does not benefit African-Americans" who don't do well in the schools that accept them under affirmative action, and that those students would be better off in the less advanced schools that they would have otherwise gone to.

He argued that "most of the black scientists in this country do not come from the most advanced schools" and that they benefit from a "slower track."

"They're being pushed into schools that are too advanced for them," Scalia said Wednesday of minority students accepted under affirmative action programs.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 9, 2015 - 11:29am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 9, 2015 - 11:34am PT
Excellent, HDDJ!^^^^

John
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 9, 2015 - 06:02pm PT
In light of current affairs, perhaps this is worth another look...

An Atheist Muslim's Perspective on the 'Root Causes' of Islamist Jihadism and the Politics of Islamophobia...


"The taboo against criticizing religion is still so astonishingly pervasive that centuries of hard lessons haven't yet opened our eyes to what has been apparent all along: It is often religion itself, not the "distortion," "hijacking," "misrepresentation" or "politicization" of religion, that is the root cause." -Ali A Rizvi


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/an-atheist-muslims-perspective-on-the-root-causes-of-islamist-jihadism-and-the-politics-of-islamophobia_b_3159286.html
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 9, 2015 - 09:30pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 05:03am PT
Carly Fiorina came to speak at my hospital yesterday. She game almost the exact same message as Newt Gingrich did when he came 4 years ago: big institutions are bad and stifle innovation. Small ones are good. I am the voice of the people. When asked about gun legislation she insisted that the ones that we had needed to be enforce competently before we run off yelling that we need new ones. She pointed out that the Virginia Tech shooter purchased a gun because the background check system failed, but when asked if she would close the private purchase loophole in the background check system went back to her line about enforcing existing laws. She also insisted that Obamacare was to blame for increase health insurance prices and that Dodd-Frank was to blame for consolidation in the banking industry.



In news:

Radicalized Christian terrorist declares "I am a warrior for the babies." When will our President finally come out and say that this country has a problem with radical Christianity? He won't even say the words "radical Christian extremism." He won't say it! I'm pretty sure he's a secret Christian himself.

The latest CBS poll has Trump at 35% support amongst likely Republican primary voters. Cruz came in 2nd place with 16% and Ben Carson dropped to 3rd with 14%. Note that "likely Republican primary voter" is a pretty hard right-wing crew demographically.

Liberty University is allowing concealed carry permit holders to pack on campus.

VW admitted that its emissions cheating was a widespread policy that coincided with its decision to push diesel engines back in 2005.

The US and 99 other nations are backing a plan to hold climate temperature increases to 1.5 degrees. This temperature is favored by island nations who are at risk of being decimated by ocean level rise a the 2 degree increase level.

While the United States dithers and wrings its hands about taking 10,000 Syrian refugees over the next 3 years, Canada is taking 10,000 by the end of 2015.
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 05:32am PT
So, why do we pay more (for less coverage in many cases, such as mine) for health insurance? Was it just a coincidence that it happened to occur after Obamacare was passed?
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 05:48am PT
I thought I'd check up on this thread, and I see we have a religion/science debate going on. A scientific observation (it's a refutable hypothesis) is that the best scientific wisdom of any moment is almost certainly not fully correct, it's always missing refinements, which can turn out to be marginal, or paradigm changing. If close to 50% of the people running around don't believe in evolution, then there must be some evolutionary fitness associated with that belief. A Bayesian will start to wonder...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 05:48am PT
So, why do we pay more (for less coverage in many cases, such as mine) for health insurance? Was it just a coincidence that it happened to occur after Obamacare was passed?

For starters, look at what premiums and deductibles were doing before Obamacare and let me know if you see a trend. (Hint: they were both going up.)

Then, consider that what an individual thinks of as "healthcare spending" and what an economist thinks of as "healthcare spending" are two different things. In the 90's, managed care successfully kept over healthcare spending down by raising deductibles and restricting options. People hated it, but it was the only thing we've done that has reduced overall spending. Obamacare didn't directly address healthcare spending (as Republicans were incredibly eager to point out until they figured out they could start blaming it). The year over year increase in overall healthcare spending has decreased since Obamacare and more people have access to insurance. To accomplish this, health insurers are shifting costs. Additionally, employers have figured out that they can force employees to accept larger and larger shares of their healthcare premiums with little repercussion. As a result, deductibles and employee premiums have gone up faster than increases in overall healthcare spending. Ironically, this is exactly what Republicans have advocated for forever. If fatty's posts hadn't been deleted I could link you a zillion times he crowed that people needed more "skin in the game" to hold down costs.

I should add that Fiorina made incredibly clear that it was vital for people with preexisting conditions to be able to get health insurance and cited her status as a cancer survivor. Without Obamacare, this would not be current law. Our healthcare system still has plenty of problems and nobody believes that the ACA was the end all be all of healthcare fixes, it just accomplished a lot of the goals that reformers had. Congress could spend its time fixing these problems, but Republicans have made "Obamacare" so toxic that they can't touch it even though most of them (and their constituents) support most of the major provisions in the law.



If close to 50% of the people running around don't believe in evolution, then there must be some evolutionary fitness associated with that belief.

uuuuuuuum.....I'm pretty sure that's not how evolution works.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 10, 2015 - 06:17am PT

By giving so much airtime to the Republican leadership battle, the preoccupations of a tiny but vociferous portion of the American electorate is being showcased as though they represent the views of Americans as a whole.

As the main U.S. media outlets report and amplify each and every outlandish assertion by Donald Trump and his fellow contenders for the Republican presidential nomination, major damage is being done to the underlying quality of the dominant political discourse in the United States.

That damage has two main characteristics. By giving so much airtime to the Republican leadership battle, the preoccupations of a tiny but vociferous portion of the American electorate is being showcased as though they represent the views of Americans as a whole. And by restricting the response to that battle largely to the counter-views of the leading Democratic Party contenders, a whole slew of arguments of a more profound kind are receiving virtually no air time at all. The democratic process is being inexorably damaged by both these tendencies.

The Republican candidates are currently having a field day. Views that once would have been roundly condemned as unacceptably non-American are now treated as simply more moderate responses to proposals that are more outlandish still. Views that once would have been quickly dismissed as factually incorrect are now given traction and legitimacy by their regular repetition. This is the real damage currently being inflicted on the quality of American political discourse by Donald Trump in particular, damage rooted in his apparently consistent search for the evermore reactionary position that leaves simple conservatism looking gloriously moderate by comparison.

These assertions by leading presidential candidates play well to a Republican Tea Party base that is hungry for quick and simple solutions to what are in reality deeply-rooted and complicated problems. But they potentially play well too to a wider American audience -- one that is aware of America's increasing involvement in a third Middle Eastern conflagration and one that feels, particularly after the mass shootings in San Bernardino, increasingly unsafe because of that involvement. That is an audience which is likely to look first to the White House, or even to the Democratic Party more generally, for reassurance and action; so it is also an audience which is likely to be currently disappointed and frustrated by the heavily qualified justifications for war now currently on offer from the Obama administration.

The president struggled to be heard on all of this in his Sunday night address, his voice partly drowned out by the cacophony of hate now passing as legitimate political commentary on right-wing radio and television talk shows. Yet even if his right-wing critics had been willing to hear him out, what they would have heard was less than fully convincing. For he would have them and us believe that it is possible to fight ISIS successfully without committing large numbers of U.S. ground troops to yet another Iraq-type war; and that it is possible to wage that war without significantly increasing the danger of large-scale terrorist activity here at home. These two claims rest on a linked set of well-rehearsed but still problematic assertions: that airstrikes are effectively degrading ISIS as a military force; that local ground forces are available to complete that degradation if properly trained by the United States; and that a broad coalition of the willing is involved in this fight, happy to accept U.S. political leadership and to share the burdens and dangers involved.

The trouble with all these claims and assertions is that we have heard them before, and seen them fail in both Afghanistan and Iraq. We are seeing the training of local forces in Iraq and Syria failing even now. Little wonder then that, when offered the prospect of foreign war without domestic pain, the Obama administration should be losing ground to Republican arguments that wars are not won that way, and that if this one is to be won it has to be harder fought. Little wonder either that the Democratic candidate who is most likely to face this Republican onslaught next November is already sounding more hawkish on ISIS than the administration that she has both to defend and to replace. The president would have us conduct a surgical war, "strong and smart" as he put it. His opponents want something that is significantly more strident: but both of them seem to be offering us the prospect of yet more war without end. Both seem to be offering us, that is, what Ira Chemus recently correctly labelled "America's Reckless War against Evil."

David Coates
Worrell Professor of Anglo-American Studies, Wake Forest University, Department of Politics
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 06:39am PT
And, don't forget HDDJ, that part of our premiums (and taxes)go to corporate profits, this is what really bugs me about privatization of any government service - our taxes going to profit margins. A legacy of Regan, who I still think was a buffoon, just as I did in 1980. Now he's been all but deified. Even Obama felt he needed to pay homage to Lord Regan.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 06:57am PT
uuuuuuuum.....I'm pretty sure that's not how evolution works.

So, you mean that the observable characteristics of a population are not related to the evolutionary fitness of its members?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 07:00am PT
The adherence to or derivation from belief in a particular idea is not, no.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:02am PT
Hidesert ask Chuck Schumer why Obama Care is shitty..

It should be called "KEEP THE INSURANCE COMPANIES INTACT ACT"

[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 07:03am PT
Reeotch posted
And, don't forget HDDJ, that part of our premiums (and taxes)go to corporate profits, this is what really bugs me about privatization of any government service - our taxes going to profit margins. A legacy of Regan, who I still think was a buffoon, just as I did in 1980. Now he's been all but deified. Even Obama felt he needed to pay homage to Lord Regan.

Indeed. Obamacare actually caps those profits at 20% and forces them to pay money back to their policyholders (many people have received checks). I'm not clear what you think is a legacy of Reagan, exactly. For profit healthcare was not invented in the 80's and Medicare has always been a boon to the private sector.

pyro spurted
It should be called "KEEP THE INSURANCE COMPANIES INTACT ACT"

I'm not entirely clear what you think the alternative should have been. If it had been left entirely to liberals there would be virtually no health insurance companies left at all and we'd have single payer like almost every other developed nation.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:04am PT
Crazy behavior usually doesn't pay off, in the sense that you don't get lucky. (Getting lucky is the main thing behind evolution, no wonder the religious folks don't like it!). But it can jump a complacent population out of an evolutionary well.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:05am PT
If ostentatious display of a belief, or tail feathers, helps you get lucky, then yes, it is related.

Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:07am PT
I'm not entirely clear what you think the alternative should have been. If it had been left entirely to liberals there would be virtually no health insurance companies left at all and we'd have single payer like almost every other developed nation.


Bingo!

Obamacare isn't "liberal" at all. Regan would be proud.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:09am PT
No wonder people don't believe the theory!
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:10am PT
Yes it does Dingus!
If your genes are to survive you have to "get lucky"!
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:11am PT
Getting lucky in the sense of getting laid, duh!
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:19am PT
I teach a whole class based on evolution. It is not enough to survive, you have to pass your genes on. Otherwise you have been "selected against" and your genes are history . . .

What don't I get, I'm curious?
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:24am PT
Shoot, maybe I'm fuking up, like REAGAN, not REGAN. As is well known, Nancy always got top.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:25am PT
So DMT, you are applying a law of large numbers, which, essentially, obviates the role of mutation. The consequences of a rare, but important change, can be important. In order for that to occur, that individual has to reproduce. Off to walk doggies now, with no apparent impact on my evolutionary fitness.
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:28am PT
But what about my kids?
Winning in evolutionary terms means successfully passing your genes on to the next generation.But evolution works on the population level, not the individual level. At the population level luck has nothing to do with it, as you said.

Thread drift . . .
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 07:33am PT
One could argue that luck plays a part. There is order in randomness, however.
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 07:38am PT
But, what does the Donald say about evolution (bracing myself . . .)
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 08:15am PT
Dogs are happy. I would say that there are cases where an individual may affect a population's reproductive behavior, even if that individual has no contribution to the gene pool. Jesus would be an example. This is one of those little wrinkles that the theory of evolution doesn't (?) address.

The (?) is because it's not strictly necessary to get lucky to pass on your genes.

DMT: let's try to rope up sometime! I come to the US every summer.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 08:17am PT
Dogs are happy. I would say that there are cases where an individual may affect a population's reproductive behavior, even if that individual has no contribution to the gene pool.


Dogs appear happy to humans which increases human affinity for dogs and makes us want to care for them.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/dogs-but-not-wolves-use-humans-as-tools/

mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 08:20am PT
Sugar rush tells us that Captain Crunch makes us feel good, so we eat more. What's your point?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 10, 2015 - 08:21am PT
Liberals, please watch. It's only 10 minutes.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tOu6hl6vQE

re blasphemy law

“It should apply to all religions. If we have laws, they should apply to everybody. Religions are very special to people. And therefore I have no objection to them… but it must apply equally to everybody.”

-Keith Vaz
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 08:23am PT

It's a political cartoon made out of real tweets! This literally summarizes conservative viewpoints on this issue. A lot of tweets were deleted in the whitewashing of this message.


mcreel posted
Sugar rush tells us that Captain Crunch makes us feel good, so we eat more. What's your point?

That you are nothing more than a domesticated tool for your dog. Free will is a lie. Your life is a lie.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 08:23am PT
Cheers, y'all. Over and out.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 08:31am PT
The conclusions of the Armed Services Committee report on Bergdahl's prisoner swap:


And the dissent:

This report is an unbalanced, partisan, and needless attempt to justify a predetermined position regarding the transfer of five Guantanamo detainees in exchange for the release of Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl from enemy captivity.

Much of our disappointment with the report derives from the highly exclusive manner in which it was generated. The minority was excluded from the majority’s closed process for: analyzing and distilling the collected information, crafting findings and conclusions, and drafting the report. In fact, despite months of prodding by the minority, the majority failed to provide a draft of the report to the minority until 5:15 pm on Monday, November 23, 2015. (The underlying investigation was initiated by Chairman McKeon nearly a year-and-a-half prior, on July 17, 2014.) We were then provided two weeks, which included the Thanksgiving holiday period, to review the majority’s draft report and to make comment. All the while, the majority was making substantial edits to that draft. The majority did not provide a final draft of the report to the minority until 10:27 am on Wednesday, December 9, 2015.

We are disappointed that the majority needlessly allocated tremendous amounts of time and taxpayer resources to generate a report that essentially found what the supporters of H. Res. 644 already passed in 2014 with little evidence to support it.

We consider this report to be an expression of shrill demagoguery, contrary to the interests of national security, and beneath the dignity of the House Armed Services Committee.

For all of the preceding reasons, we dissent.
mcreel

climber
Barcelona
Dec 10, 2015 - 08:40am PT
That you are nothing more than a domesticated tool for your dog.
Tell me something I don't know!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 08:47am PT
Stormfront, the leading white supremacy website in America, credits Donald Trump with increased traffic to their website and a greater ease at spreading their message. "He has sparked an insurgency," per the founder. David Duke also credits Trump with his highest number of speaking engagements in 20 years.

The Ku Klux Klan is using Donald Trump as a talking point in its outreach efforts. Stormfront, the most prominent American white supremacist website, is upgrading its servers in part to cope with a Trump traffic spike. And former Louisiana Rep. David Duke reports that the businessman has given more Americans cover to speak out loud about white nationalism than at any time since his own political campaigns in the 1990s.

As hate group monitors at the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League warn that Trump’s rhetoric is conducive to anti-Muslim violence, white nationalist leaders are capitalizing on his candidacy to invigorate and expand their movement.

“Demoralization has been the biggest enemy and Trump is changing all that,” said Stormfront founder Don Black, who reports additional listeners and call volume to his phone-in radio show, in addition to the site’s traffic bump. Black predicts that the white nationalist forces set in motion by Trump will be a legacy that outlives the businessman’s political career. “He’s certainly creating a movement that will continue independently of him even if he does fold at some point.”

Trump does not belong to or endorse white supremacist groups. He has said that he does not need or want Duke’s endorsement and his campaign has fired two staffers over racist posts on social media. A man displaying a Confederate flag was ejected from a Trump rally in Virginia earlier this month.

So much interesting news today!
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 10, 2015 - 09:46am PT
teach a whole class based on evolution. It is not enough to survive, you have to pass your genes on. Otherwise you have been "selected against" and your genes are history . . .

you must not be teaching the gene centered theory of evolution.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene-centered_view_of_evolution

First off, nobody survives. You can help ensure your genes continue if you perish before you procreate.

You never pass on all your genes unless there have been advances in cloning nobody is talking about, and it's quite possible that other forms of kinship ensure the continuation of a gene pool or pass on more of your genes. Sacrifice and support for a sibling is a good example. There are uncle/aunt analogs that work. In environments where there are high mortality rates, more of the non breeder's genes might continue if there is sacrifice by relatives of the breeder.

Diversity might matter. In some long term scenarios, more of "your genes" might continue if you support another race or species, or at least not impede their survival.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 10, 2015 - 10:54am PT
By giving so much airtime to the Republican leadership battle, the preoccupations of a tiny but vociferous portion of the American electorate is being showcased as though they represent the views of Americans as a whole.

Of course, only the worst Republican candidate - and the one whose nomination would do the most damage to the Republican party - gets airtime. Not conincidentally, anything that could derail Hillary Clinton's campaign, -- e.g. giving Bernie Sanders the same sort of exposure they give Trump, or giving one-third of a newscast (As NBC did a couple of nights ago re Trump) to a discussion of one of Hillary's lies given to congress -- somehow gets miniscule, if any, coverage.

Welcome to the world of the mainstream media. If people wonder why our partisanship keeps increasing, perhaps we should look no farther than the absence of any attempt at objective broadcast journalism. People recognize the lies of their opponents, but not those of their supporters, so they stop listening to "opposing" news sources, and merely listen to their own.

The worst part about this, however, is that broadcast media give us what we want. If there really existed a substantial market for objective broadcast news, and particularly if that market also had sufficient means to entice advertisers, someone would be making a killing serving it.

John
philo

climber
Dec 10, 2015 - 10:55am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 10, 2015 - 10:56am PT
On a slightly different subthread, since so many here seem to be experts in evolutionary theory, could someone explain to me how sexual reproduction came into being? Whoever or whatever caused that has given me 3 decades of heartache, followed by 3+ decades of joy.

John
philo

climber
Dec 10, 2015 - 11:01am PT
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 10, 2015 - 11:07am PT
GOP is in a death spiral. Let's see if they can pull back on the stick in time.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nightmare-scenario-for-establishment-trump-or-cruz/ar-AAgeWAY?li=BBnbcA1
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 10, 2015 - 01:42pm PT
John wrote:

Not coincidentally, anything that could derail Hillary Clinton's campaign,

John i was reading the FB comments section on Meet the press and thought this might be of something to think about.. her own campaign could be at fault..

Your right about her not appearing on here ( or other sunday shows) as much as other candidates; that's something I hope the Clinton campaign realizes is a mistake

Chuck Todd


Edit: I posted a link for norton


crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 10, 2015 - 02:13pm PT
NBC is turning on Trump. Very good coverage. Better late than never.
Fox is nonstop garbage, except Shep Smith. 20x the worst coverage, hence the support for Trump from their viewership, the GOP base.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 10, 2015 - 02:20pm PT
NBC is turning on Trump.

No kidding! As I posted above, I wish the networks would spend equal effort on some of the other nefarious things done by other candidates, but Trump makes it too easy for the entertainers posing as journalists.

I wonder whether the overwhelming condemnation of his abominable pronouncementsfrom virtually every corner of every political party and elsewhere will have any negative effect on his vote totals when the primaries take place. The fact that Trump probably draws most of his support from the people who don't pay attention to anything conventional makes me skeptical, but a man can dream. How anyone can be anything but horrified at his continued viability as a candidate escapes me.

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 10, 2015 - 02:43pm PT
But, what does the Donald say about evolution (bracing myself . . .)

Softball. You know what the answer is.....


Trump: "I'm blessed with very good genes. My father lived until he was very old. My mother lived until she was very old."
.

" Dr John Trump, uncle, for many years at M.I.T. -good genes,

Must subscribe to the gene centered theory.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 10, 2015 - 02:50pm PT
Loved that video of Trump with the eagle - I'd like to think it is a metaphor for the spirit of all that's gentle and decent in the U.S. reacting towards his loathsome pronouncements.

Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 02:55pm PT
The fact that Trump probably draws most of his support from the people who don't pay attention to anything conventional makes me skeptical, but a man can dream. How anyone can be anything but horrified at his continued viability as a candidate escapes me.

You just got to laugh. The dumbing down of America has succeeded.

Edit: The real funny thing is that Trump actually makes Clinton look good. Kinda like putting lipstick on a pig. And, that's hillaryarious. (And sad as hell)
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 03:20pm PT
crank posted
Fox is nonstop garbage, except Shep Smith. 20x the worst coverage, hence the support for Trump from their viewership, the GOP base.

It seems to be the other way around. Trump supporters watch Fox. When Trump threatened to boycott Ailes went crawling to him on his knees. Sure sign of editorial independance.
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
Dec 10, 2015 - 04:15pm PT
He lies to them daily, but they believe it. Crazy.

Yeah, so does the media. Crazy.
Why are you surprised people would believe Trump. Americans will believe anything.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 10, 2015 - 04:24pm PT
They listen to talk radio. That's where they mostly get it. Add Fox, toxic brew.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 10, 2015 - 04:27pm PT
I have such an insane political boner right now.

GOP preparing for contested convention

Republican officials and leading figures in the party’s establishment are now preparing for the possibility of a brokered convention as Donald Trump continues sit atop the polls and the presidential race.

More than 20 of them convened Monday for a dinner held by Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, where the prospect of Trump nearing next year’s nominating convention in Cleveland with a significant number of delegates dominated the discussion, according to five people familiar with the meeting.

Considering that scenario as Priebus and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) listened, several longtime power brokers argued that if the controversial billionaire storms through the primaries, the party’s establishment must lay the groundwork for a floor fight, in which the GOP’s mainstream wing could coalesce around an alternative, the people said.


This would be a lot of fun. And absolutely terrifying. Chicago 1968 would look like a well organized, peaceful dinner conversation by contrast.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 06:16am PT
US Update:

A white Oklahoma police officer convicted of sexually assaulting 8 black women ages 17 - 57 while on duty. He was accused of assaulting 5 others.

One woman was taken to a hospital by three police officers after they discovered she was high. She testified Holtzclaw groped her several times, exposed himself, and forced her into oral sex, telling her to remain still so that her heart monitor would not go off.

Some dude in Connecticut built a flame thrower drone that can roast a turkey while hovering. It's totally legal.

The GOP is preparing for the possibility of a deadlocked convention.

In a new poll, 57% of Americans disagree with Trump's plan to ban Muslims. A majority (42%) of Republicans approve of it.

And for maximum facepalm irony, Donald Trump tweeted this back in May:


Be smart, SuperTaco.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 09:42am PT
25% of Democrats either approve of or are unsure about Trump's ban on Muslims.

blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Dec 11, 2015 - 09:53am PT

In a new poll, 57% of Americans disagree with Trump's plan to ban Muslims. A majority (42%) of Republicans approve of it.

What kind of majority is 42%??
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:05am PT
Doesn't matter if you approve of a halt on new Muslim entry, or a list of 34 banned country's; we are just one 9-11 scale, or 3-4 SB'S scale events away from instituting it. It's that religion/countries problem and we are fools to suffer the consequences of their inability or unwillingness to squash their radical elements.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:07am PT
What kind of majority is 42%??

The sort of "majority" that elected Bill Clinton twice, and that could elect Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders if Trump stays in the race long enough.

John
philo

climber
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:13am PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 10:58am PT
blahblah posted
What kind of majority is 42%??

Apologies, I meant to write plurality.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 11, 2015 - 11:14am PT
It is hilarious watching the wheels come off the GOP clown car. Now Carson threatening to bail because of the RNC plotting against Trump.

Where is the popcorn...

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 11:18am PT
"I am quitting the race, not because I am a horribly inept candidate who is on a downward spiral, but because of the terrible way my dear friend Mr. Trump is being treated."
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 11, 2015 - 11:27am PT
Who was one of the biggest defenders of Muslims in the US?

Thomas Jefferson:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/11/how-thomas-jefferson-and-other-founding-fathers-defended-muslim-rights/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_jefferson_muslim_1045am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 11:38am PT
That was a different time. Jefferson didn't know what it was like to have people hate your freedom so much that they would be willing to kill you.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 11, 2015 - 01:01pm PT
He didn't know any british?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 11, 2015 - 01:10pm PT
Doesn't matter if you approve of a halt on new Muslim entry, or a list of 34 banned country's; we are just one 9-11 scale, or 3-4 SB'S scale events away from instituting it. It's that religion/countries problem and we are fools to suffer the consequences of their inability or unwillingness to squash their radical elements.

I don't think you are wrong. However, it really says something about the durability of our philosophy and commitment to freedom. The Jihadi's say that we are not strong and committed to our system, that we will violate our own laws whenever convenient.

Your statement would seem to go along with that, and I think it is true.

On the other hand, the Jihadi's actually are very committed.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 11, 2015 - 01:31pm PT
The Klan is super stoked about the Donald. Traffic on their websites is way up. The harsh rhetoric from the Repug's is encouraging the crazies to let their freak flags fly!
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 11, 2015 - 01:33pm PT

Dec 11, 2015 - 01:05pm PT
Jefferson set the Marines on the Barbary Pirates aka 'to the shores of Tripoli' as President.

I'm just saying... the more things change the more they stay the same.

DMT

Yeah that was 1803, and the war's slogan was 'not one cent for tribute'

We ended up paying the Barbary sultans $60,000 ransom to get our prisoners back in 1805.

Seems like only a semantic difference. The USA had captured the city of Derna and just gave it back to them.

Then from 1807 to 1815 they captured sailors and ships and we paid tribute until Madison fought the second Barbary war.


We didn't do it before that because we were busy putting out fires in Washington.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 11, 2015 - 02:15pm PT
Proclick: http://twitter.com/deray/status/674790510360403968

Full video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ztGWnTU5oM
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 11, 2015 - 06:20pm PT
Yep, Republicans are liars...

Falsehood Face-Off
Statements since 2007 by presidential candidates (and some current and former officeholders) ranked from most dishonest over all to least dishonest, as fact-checked by PolitiFact. “Pants on Fire” refers to the most egregious falsehoods.

The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 11, 2015 - 09:27pm PT
Time for a little Reality Check....



He is the one that is truly in charge... of everything.

Be hilarious to see peon Bernie try and tax his deep deep wealth.


Oh yeah, almost forgot....


thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 11, 2015 - 09:41pm PT
yawn.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 11, 2015 - 09:52pm PT
This one's just for you Cowgirl^^^^^^^^^^^^^



[Click to View YouTube Video]
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 11, 2015 - 09:53pm PT

What Stinks in Saudi Ain’t the Camel Dung
By F. William Engdahl

December 11, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - In recent weeks one nation after another is falling over themselves, literally, to join the turkey shoot known, erroneously, as the war in Syria, ostensibly against the Islamic State or Daesh. The most wanted but most feared question is where will this war frenzy lead, and how can it be stopped short of dragging the entire planet into a world war of destruction?

On September 30, responding to a formal invitation or plea from the duly-elected President of the Syrian Arab Republic, the Russian Federation began what was an initially highly effective bombing campaign in support of the Syrian Government Army.

On 13 November following the terror attacks claimed by ISIS in Paris, the French President proclaimed France was “at war” and immediately sent her one and only aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, to Syria to join the battle. Then on December 4, the German Parliament approved sending 1,200 German soldiers and six Tornado jets to “help” France. Reports out of Germany say the Germans will not work with Russia or the Assad regime, but with CentCom command in Florida and coalition headquarters, not in Damascus, but in Kuwait. The same week the UK Parliament approved sending British planes and forces to “fight ISIS” in Syria. Again we can be sure it’s not to help Russia’s cause in cooperation with the Syrian Army of Assad to restore sovereignty to Syria.

Then Turkey’s hot-head President Recep Erdoğan, fresh from his criminal, premeditated downing of the Russian SU-24 in Syria, orders Turkish tanks into the oil-rich Mosul region of Iraq against the vehement protests of the Iraqi government. And added to this chaos, the United States claims that its planes have been surgically bombing ISIS sites for more than a year, yet the result has been only to expand the territories controlled by ISIS and other terror groups.

If we take a minute to step back and reflect, we can readily realize the world is literally going berzerk, with Syria as merely the ignition to a far uglier situation which has the potential to destroy our lovely, peaceful planet.

Something major missing

In recent weeks I have been increasingly unsatisfied by the general explanations about who is actually pulling the strings in the entire Middle East plot or, more precisely, plots, to the point of reexamining my earlier views on the role of Saudi Arabia. Since the June, 2015 surprise meeting in St Petersburg between Russian President Putin and Saudi Defense Minister Prince Salman, the Saudi monarchy gave a carefully cultivated impression of rapprochement with former arch-enemy Russia, even discussing purchase of up to $10 billion in Russian military equipment and nuclear plants, and possible “face time” for Putin with the Saudi King Salman.

The long procession of Arab leaders going to Moscow and Sochi in recent months to meet President Putin gave the impression of a modern version of the walk to Canossa in1077 of Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV to Pope Gregory VII at Canossa Castle, to beg revocation of Henry’s ex-communication. This time it looked like it was the Gulf Arab monarchs in the role of Henry IV, and Vladimir Putin in the role of the Pope. Or so it seemed. I at least believed that at the time. Like many global political events, that, too, was soaked in deception and lies.

What is now emerging, especially clear since the Turkish deliberate ambush of the Russian SU-24 jet inside Syrian airspace, is that Russia is not fighting a war against merely ISIS terrorists, nor against the ISIS backers in Turkey. Russia is taking on, perhaps unknowingly, a vastly more dangerous plot. Behind that plot is the hidden role of Saudi Arabia and its new monarch, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, together with his son, the Defense Minister, Prince Salman.

Saudi ‘impulsive intervention policy’

German media has widely reported a leaked German BND intelligence estimate. The BND is Germany’s version of the CIA. The BND report, among other things, concentrates on the rising role of the King’s son, 30-year-old Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Referring to the child prince’s important role the BND states, “The current cautious diplomatic stance of senior members of the Saudi royal family will be replaced by an impulsive intervention policy.”

Prince Salman is Defense Minister and led the Kingdom, beginning last March, into a mad war, code-named by Salman as “Operation Decisive Storm,” in neighboring Yemen. Saudis headed a coalition of Arab states that includes Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Sudan, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain. The Prince is also head of the Saudi Economic Council which he created.

The new King, Salman, is not the benign sweet guy his PR staff try to paint him.

As my soon-to-be-released book, The Lost Hegemon: Whom the gods would destroy, documents in detail, ever since CIA Cairo Station Chief Miles Copeland organized the transfer of the Muslim Brotherhood, banned in Egypt for an alleged assassination attempt against Nasser, to Saudi Arabia in the early 1950’s, there has existed a perverse marriage of the Saudi monarchy and radical “Islamic” terrorist organizations. As described by John Loftus, a former US Justice Department official, by the joining of Egypt’s Muslim Brothers and Saudi strict Islam, “they combined the doctrines of Nazism with this weird Islamic cult, Wahhabism.”

Allen Dulles’ CIA secretly persuaded the Saudi monarchy in 1954 to help rebuild the banned Muslim Brotherhood, thereby creating a fusion of the Brotherhood with Saudi ultra-fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam and, of course, backed by the vast Saudi oil riches. The CIA planned to use the Saudi Muslim Brothers to wield a weapon across the entire Muslim world against feared Soviet incursions. A fanatical young terrorist named Osama bin Laden was later to arise out of this marriage in Hell between the Brotherhood and Wahhabite Saudi Islam.

King Salman was in the middle of creating Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda as it was later dubbed in the media. His involvement goes back to the late 1970’s when he, as Governor of Riyadh, was named head of major conservative Saudi charities later discovered financing Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Bosnia. Salman worked intimately as the financial funding conduit for what became Al Qaeda together with bin Laden’s Saudi intelligence “handler,” then-head of Saudi Intelligence, Prince Turki Al-Faisal and the Saudi-financed Muslim World League.

King Salman in those days headed the Saudi High Commission for Relief to Bosnia-Herzegovina, a key front for al-Qaeda in the Balkans in the 1990s. According to a United Nations investigation, Salman in the 1990s transferred more than $120 million from commission accounts under his control — as well as his own personal accounts — to the Third World Relief Agency, an al-Qaida front and the main pipeline for illegal weapons shipments to al-Qaida fighters in the Balkans. Osama bin Laden was directly involved in those operations of Salman.

During the US invasion of Iraq in 2003-4, Al Qaeda entered that country, headed by Moroccan-born terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who had pledged allegiance to bin Laden’s Al Qaeda, creating Al Qaeda in Iraq, later calling itself the Islamic State in Iraq, the Saudi-financed forerunner of ISIS. A declassified Pentagon DIA document shows that in August 2012, the DIA knew that the US-backed Syrian insurgency was dominated by Islamist militant groups including “the Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda in Iraq.” According to author Gerald Posner, Salman’s son, Ahmed bin Salman, who died in 2002, also had ties to al-Qaida.

A Saudi Oil Imperium

If we look at the emergence of Al Qaeda in Iraq and its transformation into the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), it all traces back to the Saudi operations going back to the late 1970’s involving now-King Salman, Saudi Osama bin Laden, together with Saudi intelligence head, Prince Turki Al-Faisal.

Washington and the CIA worked intimately with this Saudi network, bringing bin Laden and other key Saudis into Pakistan to train with the Pakistani ISI intelligence, creating what became the Afghan Mujahideen. The Mujahideen were created by Saudi, Pakistani and US intelligence to defeat the Soviet Red Army in the 1980’s Afghanistan war, the CIA’s “Operation Cyclone.” Cyclone was Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan to lure Moscow into an Afghan “Bear Trap” and give the Soviet Union what he called their “Vietnam.”

The so-called ISIS today in Iraq and Syria, as well as the Al Qaeda Al-Nusra Front in Syria and various other Jihad terror splinter gangs under attack from Russia and the Damascus government of Assad, all have their origins in Saudi Arabia and the activities of King Salman.

Has the King undergone a Saul-to-Paul conversion to a pacific world view since becoming King, and his son, Prince Salman as well? Despite signals in recent months that the Saudis have ceased financing the anti-Assad terror organizations in Syria, the reality is the opposite.

The Saudis Behind Erdoğan

Much attention of late is given, understandably, to the Turkish dictatorship of the thug, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. This is especially so since his Air Force deliberately shot down the Russian SU-24 jet over Syrian territory, an act of war. What few look at are the ties of Erdoğan and his AKP to the Saudi monarchy.

According to a well-informed Turkish political source I spoke with in 2014, who had been involved in attempts to broker a peace between Assad and Erdoğan, Erdoğan’s first Presidential election campaign in August 2014 was “greased” by a gift of $ 10 billion from the Saudis. After his victory in buying the presidential election, Erdoğan and his hand-picked Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu opened the doors wide to establish secret training centers for what was to be called ISIS. Under supervision of Hakan Fidan, Erdoğan’s hand-picked head of the Secret Services (MIT), Turkey organized camps for training ISIS and other terrorists in Turkey and also to provide their supplies in Syria. The financing for the Turkish ISIS operation was arranged apparently by a close personal friend of Erdoğan named Yasin al-Qadi, a Saudi banker close to the Saudi Royal House, member of the Muslim Brotherhood, financier of Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda since Afghanistan in the 1980’s. x

Erdoğan’s US-sanctioned and Saudi-financed terrorist training camps have brought an estimated 200,000 mercenary terrorists from all over the world, transited by Turkey in order to wage “jihad” in Syria.

But that jihad, it is now clear, is not about Allah but about Moola—money. The Saudi monarchy is determined to control the oil fields of Iraq and of Syria using ISIS to do it. They clearly want to control the entire world oil market, first bankrupting the recent challenge from US shale oil producers, then by controlling through Turkey the oil flows of Iraq and Syria.

Saudi TOW missiles to ISIS

In May 2014, the MIT transferred to ISIS terrorists in Syria, by special train, a quantity of heavy weapons and new Toyota pick-ups offered by Saudi Arabia.

Now a detailed investigation of the Turkish shoot down of the Russian SU-24 jet reveals that the Turkish F-16 jet that shot down the jet was supported by two AWACS reconnaissance planes that enabled the Turkish F-16 exact hit, a very difficult if not impossible feat against a jet as agile as the SU-24. One of the AWACS planes was a Boeing AWACS E-3A of the Saudi Arabian air force which took off from the Riyadh, Saudi Arabia airbase.

Then, as a Russian rescue helicopter rushed to the scene of the SU-24 crash, Saudi TOW anti-aircraft missiles shot the Russian helicopter down. The Saudis had sent 500 of the highly-effective TOW missiles to anti-Assad terror groups in Syria on October 9.

What we have, then, is not an isolated Russian war against ISIS in Syria. What lies behind ISIS is not just Erdoğan’s criminal regime, but far more significant, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and her Wahhabite allies Kuwait, UAE, Qatar.

In the true sense, ISIS is simply a “Saudi army in disguise.”

If we strip away the phony religious cover, what emerges is a Saudi move to grab some of the world’s largest oil reserves, those of the Sunni parts of Iraq, and of Syria, using the criminal Turkish regime in the role of thug to do the rough work, like a bouncer in a brothel. If Moscow is not conscious of this larger dimension, she runs the risk of getting caught in a deadly “bear trap” which will more and more remind them of Afghanistan in the 1980’s.

What stinks in Saudi Arabia ain’t the camel dung. It’s the monarchy of King Salman and his hot-headed son, Prince Salman. For decades they have financed terrorism under a fake religious disguise, to advance their private plutocratic agenda. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with money and oil. A look at the ISIS map from Iraq to Syria shows that they precisely targeted the oil riches of those two sovereign states. Saudi control of that oil wealth via their ISIS agents, along with her clear plan to take out the US shale oil competition, or so Riyadh reckons, would make the Saudi monarchy a vastly richer state, one, perhaps because of that money, finally respected by white western rich men and their society. That is clearly bovine thinking.

Don’t bet on that Salman.

F. William Engdahl is a strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:22pm PT
Great article, Tom. Thanks for posting.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:29pm PT
These guys are financing the clown car.

The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 11, 2015 - 10:35pm PT
This guy is financing the Hildabeast/Obama Clown Bus and Train and Plane and....


crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:57am PT
Ted "Carpet Bomb" Cruz was too busy to attend an important committee meeting last week on combating the Islamic State. Too busy raising cash and blotivating to the base on Fox.
This guy is worse than Trump.

This would have been an instructive Senate hearing for Ted Cruz to attend: “U.S. Strategy to Counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and U.S. Policy Toward Iraq and Syria.”

The bellicose senator from Texas blew that one off on Wednesday; he was in New York, shaking his saber on Fox News and courting big-dollar donors at a closed-door luncheon on Madison Avenue.

His favorite line on ISIS seems to be, “We will carpet-bomb them into oblivion,” which he said in Iowa last week. His irresponsible chatter is of a piece with most Republican presidential candidates, who are busy offering phony prescriptions for the biggest foreign threat the United States faces.

Mr. Cruz is a lawyer and a foreign-policy neophyte. Anyone with any understanding of military strategy knows that “carpet-bombing” is a term used by amateurs trying to sound tough. Indiscriminate bombing has never been a military strategy, and it would be senseless in an age of “smart” weaponry and precise targeting.

In Syria and Iraq, mass bombing would kill hundreds of innocent civilians and fuel radicalization. That’s why military leaders utter the term “carpet-bomb” only while laughing at Mr. Cruz.

“That’s just another one of those phrases that people with no military experience throw around,” chuckled retired Maj. Gen. Robert Scales, a military historian and former commandant of the Army War College in Carlisle, Pa.

The only thing close to “carpet-bombing” was Operation Arc Light in 1965, in which two or three B-52 Stratofortresses bombed sections of Vietnam to support tactical operations on the ground, not to flatten the place. “America has never carpet-bombed anyone at any time because that’s not our doctrine,” said General Scales.

On NPR on Tuesday, Mr. Cruz further betrayed his ignorance by saying he could carpet-bomb ISIS without targeting civilians. “I want to carpet-bomb ISIS. Now when you say ‘carpet-bomb cities,’ look, no — no reasonable military endeavor targets civilians. Now, inevitably in war, there are inadvertent collateral casualties. That — it is impossible to wage a war without their being inadvertent collateral casualties.”

Steve Inskeep, the host, interjected: “But don’t you then end up with the air campaign they already have, where they’re being exceedingly careful not to hit civilians, but they hit a target when they can find a target?”

Mr. Cruz vehemently disagreed. “Let’s go to some facts. In the first Persian Gulf war, we launched roughly 1,100 air attacks a day. We carpet-bombed them into oblivion for 37 days".

Actually, no, say military leaders. That was highly targeted bombing, which was why the war took so little time.

At the hearing on United States military strategy against ISIS that Mr. Cruz missed on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Paul Selva, assessed Mr. Cruz’s prescription.

The wanton bombing Mr. Cruz repeatedly refers to, General Selva said, is categorically “not the way that we apply force in combat. It isn’t now, nor will it ever be.”

Ted Cruz, a man who thinks he’s qualified to be commander in chief, decries terrorists’ taking of innocent lives while agitating for bombing that would kill thousands of noncombatants and radicalize thousands more. What he’s saying shows an utter lack of fitness to command America’s armed forces.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/12/opinion/ted-carpet-bomb-cruz.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:01am PT
This guy is worse than Trump

Yes he is.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:17am PT
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:28am PT
Those two above should be heading to Guantanamo.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:30am PT
True this to the bone!!!


"If you think gun control is going to change the terrorists’ point of view, I think you’re, like, out of your mind. I think anybody [who says that] is. I think it’s absolutely insane. The problem, the problem that we’re having right now to turn it around…you may think you’ve got me worried about what you’re gonna do? Dude, you’re about to find out what I’m gonna do, and that’s gonna worry you a lot more. And that’s what we need. That will change the concept of gun culture, as you call it, to something [like] reality. Which is, if I’m a hockey team and I’ve got some guy bearing down on me as a goal tender, I’m not concerned about what he’s gonna do — I’m gonna make him concerned about what I’m gonna do…"
Kurt Russell 9 Dec 2015
d-know

Trad climber
electric lady land
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:40am PT
Tru dis to duh bone.

Your word is shet.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:42am PT
Old Snake Pliskin? Dealt with the baddest of the bad terrorists in the ecape from New York and LA movies.

Good idea though. Might be an effective deterrent if a rash of those on the terrorist watch list spontaneously self exploded alone from defective suicide belts.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 12, 2015 - 10:08am PT
The honeymoon is over. Paul Ryan is now a secret Muslim terrorist because he's growing a beard.


Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:48am PT
Conflict is "America's favorite pastime".

The Press is the pervayor of this economic enterprise and their dark bedfellows (big oil, the military industrial complex, pharmaceuticals, insurance lobby, unions and a host of others) are the directors. You, sitting in front of the idiot box and how you react is their design and polarization is money.

There's always the obligatory regional thug, disease, predator, dark skinned race or rich white guy at the levers to loathe and fear. That's the easy stuff, they're just bypassing your intellect and going straight for your base emotions.

I'm still amazed at their handiwork- orchestrating public support for the Iraq war. Do you remember mushroom clouds, code orange, duct tape and plastic? The press sat at the table with Bush, making that war happen and then dined on his corpse in the terrible aftermath.

The real art of the game, is watching the press manipulate the electorate. There's nothing more boring than a runaway election. They're success is directly predicated on how much they instigate your hate towards the other candidate or party.

We all watched as they alternately demonizing Obama, then Romney, then Obama, then Romney- constantly keeping the pole numbers close. In the end they chose Obama because the feel-good story could not be denied.

The same tactics where used in the Bush- Gore election. My all time favorite mind-fuk was watching them declare Bush as the winner of a debate when he was behind in the polls. The Press was tired of Gore's boring agenda and arrogance and knew the idiot/cowboy would create some real news.

Invariably, the candidates themselves fall prey to the game, succumb to the pressure and fall into their roles as partisan robots. This is the time when deals with the devil are made.

This election will see the Press tear down Hillary until she and her opponent are locked in a political death struggle- all to keep your undivided attention and their sponsors giddy. After a long hard fight, my guess is, that the first woman president will be the story they'll choose for you.

This is not an indictment of the press, the politicians, the "man", slackers or any coterie in between; they're actions are self serving and predictable...











Studly

Trad climber
WA
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:52am PT
Its all Hollywood, and anyone that thinks otherwise, they need to take a sip of wake the f*#k up and see who has taken over our country juice.
philo

climber
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:55am PT
By all means tell us who, studly
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 12, 2015 - 03:41pm PT
d-know

Trad climber
electric lady land
Dec 12, 2015 - 03:49pm PT
Shet.
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Dec 12, 2015 - 04:22pm PT
Contractor lays out a pretty solid description of the situation. He does neglect to describe how both candidates are in the end acceptable and controlled by the same interests.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 12, 2015 - 04:28pm PT
The press doesn't give a damn about platforms and programs. All they are interested in is reporting poll results, no matter who made the poll.

They have stripped the newsrooms of reporters, all that's left is typists who do the easy stories. No in depth reporting of facts.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:29pm PT
Chief-

CPO's intransigence and insults may run the USN, but here are ST, it just results in several cases of severe butt hurt by thin skinned libs. I'm sure that's the point.

Climbski2-

Your right, their diametrically opposed rhetoric during the campaign results in more of the same, once in office. I suppose they're nuanced enough in their positions to make voting worthy.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:36pm PT
The Western peoples are so dimwitted that they have not yet understood that the “war on terror” is, in fact, a war to create terror that can be exported to Muslim areas of Russia and China in order to destabilize the two countries that serve as a check on Washington’s unilateral, hegemonic power.

The problem for the neocon unilateralists is that Russia and China are powerful military powers, both nuclear and conventional—although misinformed by their “experts” educated abroad in the neoliberal tradtion, people who are de facto agents of Washington without even knowing it.

Unless Russia and China are content to be Washington’s vassal states, for the neoconservatives, who control Washington and, thereby, the West…to press these two powerful countries so hard can only lead to war.

As Washington is not a match for Russia and China in conventional warfare, the war will be nuclear, and the result will be the end of life on earth.

Whether ironic or paradoxical, the US is pushing a policy that means the end of life. Yet, the majority of Western governments support it, and the insouciant Western peoples have no clue.

But Putin has caught on. Russia is not going to submit.

Soon China will undersand that US dependency on China’s workforce and imports is not a protection from Washington’s aggression.

When China looks beyond its MIT and Harvard miseducated neoliberal economists to the writing on the wall, Washington is going to be in deep trouble.

What will Washington do? Confronted with two powerful nuclear forces, will the crazed neocons back off? Or will their confidence in their ideology bring us the final war?

This is a real question. The US government pays Internet trolls to ridicule such quesions and their authors. To see the people who sell out humanity for money, all you have to do is to read the comments on the numerous alternative news websites
dirtbag

climber
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:46pm PT
Fascinating.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:48pm PT
^^^^ Raqqa or Meggido. From which prophecy do you scribe?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 05:59pm PT
The press doesn't give a damn about platforms and programs. All they are interested in is reporting poll results, no matter who made the poll.

They have stripped the newsrooms of reporters, all that's left is typists who do the easy stories. No in depth reporting of facts.

Hold the calls - we have a winner! The press not only doesn't care about platforms and programs, it no longer seems to employ many who even understand the issues involved. Press reporting on economic issues reminds me of the quality of reporting I used to read about climbing -- clueless.

Trying to obtain reliable news requires more effort than the American people are willing to undertake, so we end up with the media we deserve.

John
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 12, 2015 - 06:15pm PT
This is a real question. The US government pays Internet trolls to ridicule such quesions and their authors. To see the people who sell out humanity for money, all you have to do is to read the comments on the numerous alternative news websites

My check must have got lost in the mail.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 12, 2015 - 06:17pm PT
doesn't much matter what prophesy appeals to you…it only takes one mistake and 30 minutes to wipe out our civilization...
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 12, 2015 - 06:23pm PT
speaking of kurt russell, bone tomahawk is shaping up to be allrriiiight.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2015 - 06:40pm PT
No wonder Washington doesn't give a rats ass about the national debt or unfunded social program liabilities. The plan is to go down in a nuclear blaze. Brilliant, to accomplish what 4.5 billion years of mega catastrophes couldn't, and in only a half hour to boot.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 12, 2015 - 06:48pm PT
hmmm…overlooking how 12,900 years ago, comet debris wiped out the entire western hemisphere, ending the human Clovis culture, as well as wiping out all the woolly mammoth, giant sloth, saber-toothed tigers, camels, horses, etc. and leaving a thin black layer of debris covering much of the globe at that point in time...
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 12, 2015 - 07:03pm PT
are you folks aware of the fact that it is currently illegal to take your own life, even in the face of medically diagnosed, egregiously terrible inevitable disintegration of self?

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 12, 2015 - 07:04pm PT
Despite the Carolina potholes, nano diamonds, the char layer, sudden mega mammal extinction, and collapse of Clovis; the cause of that event is categorized as a sudden flux of melt water into the north atlantic via mega glacial lake dam failure by our esteemed climate scientists here. Anyway, you claimed extinction of life on earth as a result of the mushroom bloom. Sorry pardner, ain't going to happen as old Gaia has seen infinitely worse. Who knows? Might be a return to the stoneage and a minor evolutionary event though.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 12, 2015 - 07:32pm PT
@ thebravecowboy. In Washington and Oregon it actually is legal. We both have death with dignity laws. Frankly, to persons like the Chief et al, this is some of the stuff liberals care about and repubs oppose.
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 12, 2015 - 07:39pm PT
The press doesn't give a damn about platforms and programs. All they are interested in is reporting poll results, no matter who made the poll.

They have stripped the newsrooms of reporters, all that's left is typists who do the easy stories. No in depth reporting of facts.

Hold the calls - we have a winner! The press not only doesn't care about platforms and programs, it no longer seems to employ many who even understand the issues involved. Press reporting on economic issues reminds me of the quality of reporting I used to read about climbing -- clueless.

Trying to obtain reliable news requires more effort than the American people are willing to undertake, so we end up with the media we deserve.

Ah, can someone please post when the American people had a Press that presented "reliable news"?


Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:07pm PT
Ahh, you must be referring to FOX news. Fair and balanced.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 08:32pm PT
Chief, the old Voice of America gave quite reliable broadcast news, and was available to anyone with a shortwave receiver. The Wall Street Journal still gives reliable news, as does the New York Times most of the time. I'm ignoring the editorial pages of either of those, of course. Otherwise, I need to dig. I still read portions of The Guardian daily to get a view from the left, and The Daily Signal to get a view from the right, but mostly I still need to do my own digging.

For example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics still reports objectively, and those results are available on the internet, as are substantial data compiled by the Census Bureau. I found I need to read any budget proposed, because the press will distort it. (e.g., when ABC reported that the military budget was increased 8% but domestic spending was cut 2%. Reading the budget disclosed that military spending was 8% higher than the previous year, and domestic spending was 6% higher than the previous year.) The Supreme Court posts all of its opinions online, etc.

As I said, it's a lot of work, but it can still be done by those who care.

John
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 12, 2015 - 09:45pm PT
John, I always enjoyed reading The Economist.

Very detailed and dense reading, and being a weekly, I had trouble keeping up. But I thought they had perspectives that were different than what I saw in the US.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 09:48pm PT
Ken, I agree about The Economist. I tend to read it second-hand, although I subscribe when I can get a good deal. Its views tend to be more moderate compared with either The Guardian or The Daily Signal, but all tend to make me think of things I would not otherwise had considered, and all report on things no one else emphasizes.

John
The Chief

climber
Down the hill & across the Valley from......
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:18pm PT
Ok John E... The BBC as I remember as a Kid, both here in CONUS and when I lived in FF, Germany, back in the early to mid 60's, was "informative" and to the factual point.

Hell, even my Pop listened to it and he was way critical of the news.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:28pm PT
Agree that the BBC was factual, but no longer.

John
7SacredPools

Trad climber
Ontario, Canada
Dec 12, 2015 - 10:56pm PT
Re: The Chief's Meme: Cain offered God the best he could, but that wasn't good enough for super fussy, biggest dick ever, God.

BTW, what is so wrong with the US that it should be scared of ISIS? Not enough guns? Afraid God really doesn't give a sh#t?

Should have posted this under the Friday Night While Drunk thread...
dirtbag

climber
Dec 12, 2015 - 11:22pm PT
Shocker: republicans are more racist than democrats; segregationists abandoned dems for reps in the 60s because the republicans embraced dog whistle racism/southern strategy.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/11/what-social-science-tells-us-about-racism-in-the-republican-party/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_wb-racism-1018am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 13, 2015 - 07:07am PT
Ranking who is "more racist" (whatever that means) isn't that helpful in a country with entrenched institutional racism that requires nothing of us to continue in perpetuity.


In economic news:

The middle class is no longer the majority economic class. It made up 61% of all Americans in 1970. Median middle class income has dropped by 4% over the last 15 years and median wealth has dropped by 15 percent. The top 0.1% of Americans have the same amount of wealth as the bottom 90%.

apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 13, 2015 - 07:40am PT
Is that news? I thought that's been pretty well established, for those who care to hear it.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 13, 2015 - 08:32am PT

Actions make racist. Know them by their actions. They cross all political spectrums.
DMT

And races
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 13, 2015 - 08:33am PT
The system does not require any action for racism to perpetuate. That's why its so insidious.


Pro-gun advocates staged a mock mass shooting at the University of Texas. Counterprotestors staged a mass farting rally armed with dildos and fart machines.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 13, 2015 - 09:57am PT
Ranking who is "more racist" (whatever that means) isn't that helpful in a country with entrenched institutional racism that requires nothing of us to continue in perpetuity.

It does. It explains why parties have different world views and policies.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 13, 2015 - 11:04am PT
The Republcan Party is morphing into the White Nationalist Party. They had all this talk after the Romney loss about aiming to be more inclusive...the opposite happened. The true nature of the majority of their voters has been revealed.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 13, 2015 - 11:21am PT
Meanwhile, the Democratic stronghold of New York City has the most segregated school system in the country. It's easy to be a vocal critic of cartoonish racism.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 13, 2015 - 11:24am PT
I hope you all get a chance to see Aya's story on Fareed Zakaria GPS this morning.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 13, 2015 - 03:23pm PT
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 13, 2015 - 03:33pm PT
Winemaker: That brilliant graphic should be the starting point for ALL discussions about how Western "economics" have impacted those unfortunate enough to be denied access to the trough that 1%ers are gorging themselves from.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 13, 2015 - 06:05pm PT
No commentary necessary but still.... this is the choice of 30% (or whatever) of repubs? I got a call about a week ago from the Carson for President people; when I realized who they were pushing I said and I quote (again) "But he's a f*#king idiot". There was a silence at the other end. I said thank you and hung up.

John M

climber
Dec 13, 2015 - 06:12pm PT
^^^^^ if its true, then that is hilarious. Man, people are funny.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 14, 2015 - 06:32am PT
To start off the week:

Ted Cruz is rallying hard in Iowa and has begun to beat Trump (by as much as 10%) in several polls.

The third Paris attacker was identified. All the attackers so far have been from France or Belgium.

The Pentagon stated that Trump's anti-Muslim rhetoric "bolsters ISIL's narrative."

The Michigan woman with a CCW permit who unsuccessfully "helped" in the pursuit of two shoplifters by unloading two rounds at their fleeing vehicle was sentenced to 18 months of probation and had her weapons permit revoked. She has vowed to "never help anyone ever again." I think we'd all appreciate that, lady, thanks.

*update*

The podium format for tomorrow's RNC debate has been released:


For some reason Paul, Fiorina and Kasich and Christie are still being included. Cruz and Trump are right next to each other and Cruz's advance in the polls appears to be what prompted Trump to go Full Klan so we'll all be hoping for fireworks.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 06:43am PT
Yep, Cruz's moment has arrived. Party on!
dirtbag

climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 07:56am PT
I'll ask my wife to pick up some popcorn for tomorrow night's sh#t show.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 14, 2015 - 08:24am PT
The most amazing thing about a Cruz pole position is the fact that Republican leaders and senators hate him. Haaaaaaaate him. Which means if he got the nomination (I still think it's going to be Rubio or Bush) we'd get to watch every major Republican try not to choke on their tongue as they talk about how awesome Cruz is.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 08:46am PT
Mitch McConnell, in particular. Cruz called him a liar.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 14, 2015 - 11:24am PT
It looks like NPR has entered into a cross-promotional deal with the Pentagon to get more podcast downloads.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 14, 2015 - 11:33am PT
General Dahl described Sergeant Bergdahl as a truthful but delusional soldier, who identified with John Galt, the hero of Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged,” and left to hike 18 miles to a larger base so he could tell a senior commander about what he felt were serious leadership problems that had placed his platoon in danger


Of course, why would we not think that Repug hero fantasies would get soldiers to desert?
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 14, 2015 - 01:50pm PT
The Chief is gone? He was a great serial poster. What happened?
Norton

Social climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 02:04pm PT
The Chief is gone? He was a great serial poster. What happened?

have to believe he posted as contentiously and obnoxiously as humanly possible

in an effort to find out how long he would be tolerated, his act had to be intentional

and so my guess is he got exactly what he wanted

he loved the outdoors, probably is a great guy to know in the real world
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 14, 2015 - 02:14pm PT
His only regret is that he couldn't take more of ya with him. And no, that isn't to his fishing holes.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Dec 14, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
How do you know Chief and Philo were banned?

Who makes that call and why?

I've been on ST for a bit but I'm still not very savvy on the inner workings.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 14, 2015 - 02:33pm PT
How do you know Chief and Philo were banned?

because when you click on their usernames it says "deactivated"


Who makes that call and why?

really only this web site's owner or administrators, Chris Mac and RJ Spurrier, etc
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Dec 14, 2015 - 03:28pm PT
Got it- thanks Norton!

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 14, 2015 - 05:49pm PT
Expect a new crankloon poster named chuff or whatever before the day is out.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 14, 2015 - 06:46pm PT
Meanwhile, in the real world, 195 nations agree to try to do something about global warming; Repubs are strangely silent because.......? Turns out a majority of Republicans actually support efforts to deal with global warming. If they (the clown car) oppose efforts to do something they are affirming to their base that they will not be intimidated by the liberals, but come the general election how can they flip their position? I certainly hope the crows are coming home to roost. Expect a loud and continuous FOX news attack. But we all knew that.

Damn, science and religion.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 14, 2015 - 06:49pm PT
Timothy McVeigh used a 1993 Ford F300 rental van from Ryder and bought Amonium Nitrate sold as "fertilizer" but made by ICI explosives of NJ. At least 3 possible lawsuits there... The first two weren't even filed. The one against ICI lasted about 8 minutes before it was dismissed.
http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur14.htm
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 14, 2015 - 06:50pm PT
Damn, science and religion.
lots of faith involved in both

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

and the cult of climatsrology
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 14, 2015 - 06:57pm PT
Our avatars should show the %of on-topic postings we make. Right TGT?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 14, 2015 - 07:03pm PT
TGT: Well, actually, science is based upon undeniable proof.
climbski2

Mountain climber
Anchorage AK, Reno NV
Dec 14, 2015 - 07:07pm PT
Stewart
TGT: Well, actually, science is based upon undeniable proof.

No it is not.. The truth is always deniable.

Science is based on verifiable observation.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 14, 2015 - 07:14pm PT


Science is based on verifiable observation

That's what Einstein said to Heisenberg.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 14, 2015 - 08:06pm PT
climbski2 & Lorenzo - got me. Who was it who said words to the effect that those who claim to understand quantum physics... don't?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 14, 2015 - 08:37pm PT
Science is as fraught with dead ends, misconceptions and group-think as any other human endeavor.

"From the crooked timber of humanity nothing straight is ever built."

Back to politics, a really long and thoughtful piece.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/14/a-stark-choice-ted-cruzs-jacksonian-americanism-vs-marco-rubios-wilsonian-internationalism/
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Dec 14, 2015 - 09:34pm PT
TGT: actually, science has to provide verifiable results before it is considered truth which, of course, can be denied by people exactly like you.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 14, 2015 - 10:21pm PT
Human beans build bridges
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 14, 2015 - 10:28pm PT
Nah. They just serve coffee.

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 14, 2015 - 10:29pm PT
Just in, Wa Post:

The survey puts Trump’s support at 38 percent among registered Republicans and GOP-leaning independents, six points higher than in October and November. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who also is running an anti-establishment campaign, has surged into second place with 15 percent, effectively doubling his support since last month.

Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ben Carson are tied for third, with 12 percent each. Carson, who with Trump was at the top of the field earlier this fall, saw his support cut roughly in half over the past month. No other candidate in the new poll registers in double digits. Former Florida governor Jeb Bush stands at 5 percent among registered Republicans.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 15, 2015 - 05:03am PT
TGT: Well, actually, science is based upon undeniable proof.

Ugh. Why are you going to make me say this. TGT is absolutely right.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 15, 2015 - 07:48am PT
Meanwhile, in the real world, 195 nations agree to try to do something about global warming; Repubs are strangely silent because.......?

They probably recognize the deal is a toothless beast. No need to even bring it up.

dirtbag

climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:05am PT
No Edward, it's because the GOP is shamefully pandering to its flat earth constituency, eg, TGT.

History, including their grandchildren, will judge them harshly.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 09:35am PT
DMT wrote:
They look like massive push-pins with really tiny pricks.
The lectern graphics, not the candidates. Ok, I meant the candidates too.


LMAO, best comment on this thread so far.

Come back Chief and Philo, come back.

And for the climate deal, shaming is all ya got?
The spice must flow.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 15, 2015 - 10:53am PT
I know it would remove a lot of back-and-forth banter keeping this thread going, but if a defender of the CP21 Agreement could describe what happens to a signatory that fails to meet the goals specified, that would be a good start.

It would also be interesting to know what happens if any of the estimated 55 countries that need some sort of ratification fail to obtain that ratification.

My view, based on the summaries I've read, is that this looks more like belling the cat than accomplishing its goal. I've seen a lot of comparisons to Kennedy's call to land a man on the moon. Part of that comparison seems apt to me: the goal is out there. Part of that comparison doesn't fit, however: the cost of sending a man to the moon, compared with the cost of sufficient carbon reduction to reduce earth's temperature by 1.5 degrees celcius, is rather like comparing the cost of building a play house to the cost of building Versailles.

John
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 15, 2015 - 11:05am PT
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/vegetarian-diet-bad-for-environment-meat-study-lettuce-three-times-worse-emissions-bacon-a6773671.html
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 15, 2015 - 01:19pm PT
TGT- Lettuce has no calories and nobody lives off of it. Bacon is fun to eat but has no nutritional value. That article is absurd. There is no mathematical way you can justify its conclusion without assuming some things about the world that are totally wrong like that vegetarians eat mostly lettuce or something silly.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 15, 2015 - 01:56pm PT
Bacon is fun to eat but has no nutritional value

Hidesert ur logic make no sense..
ur from the east coast claim ur a desert Dj!?!
give bacon a bad name boo on you!

please put up some profile pictures of YOU so the rest of the GOOD people can see ur not a weirdo.

you must be lost in LIBERLAND..
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 15, 2015 - 03:42pm PT
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
dirtbag

climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 05:49pm PT
I just popped a big bowl of popcorn, and have settled in for an evening of watching the republican monkeys fling poop at each other.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 05:56pm PT
What's it say about the Republican Party when the two most sensible candidates on the debate floor are the two ends because they are the least popular.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 06:12pm PT
A lot, HFCS.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 15, 2015 - 06:24pm PT
I'd put Jeb Bush in the sensible column. Certainly less scary than most of the rest. Especially Cruz. Dude's frightening.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 15, 2015 - 06:40pm PT
So far Trump wants to use our "best people' to close down regions of the internet and then penetrate them to learn as much about ISIS as we can, Fiorina says that the Obamacare website would have been built cheaply and easily if we had just asked top tech companies to do it, Cruz wants to carpet bomb Syria, everyone wants to close our borders to the civilians fleeing the carpet bombing of their cities and Rubio wants a better propaganda campaign to offset the message that we are sending by killing piles of civilians.

And Carson has mostly just complained about not being allowed to speak.
John M

climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 06:42pm PT
Jeb Sensible? he just said we need a bigger military so that we have the strongest military in the world.. Don't we already have that..
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 15, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
I'm being generous, John. Compare to the lunacy coming out of the mouth of Trump, Rubio & Cruz, yes.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 15, 2015 - 06:47pm PT
That's the most sensible thing that's been said so far.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 07:11pm PT
This Star Wars theme to the GOP debate doesn't make sense.

Nine Darth Vaders?

.....

"Punch the Russians in the nose." -Kasich

I take it back - that post about sensible.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 15, 2015 - 07:24pm PT
There can only be one.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 07:28pm PT
Damn, I have the sudden sense that it's only a Democratic win that stands between us and WW III.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Dec 15, 2015 - 07:30pm PT
It's easy........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z9pD_UK6vGU
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:30pm PT
I watched about 90% of the spewing----I mean the debate.

They are almost all pitching the extreme conservative Republican part of their program-------or is it pogram?

One point they almost all ranted about is: the U.S. needs to increase military spending and lower taxes. Makes my brain hurt, but then that's my problem with listening to their agenda. I have a brain.

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:36pm PT
Well, at least this time around we'd be able to kick the crap out of Germany...
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:43pm PT
I have to admit CNN did a masterful job of marginalizing the Republican field as warmongers and highlighting the inhomogenities of their policy positions in the debates first half. I noticed a huddle of candidates at a near midpoint break. After this they weren't played as easily.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:47pm PT
CNN did a great job presenting a substantive debate thanks to Wolf Blitzer and conservative, Hugh Hewitt. It's hard for hardcore, ultra-righties who live on a steady diet of hate radio and Fox softball questions to see that, of course.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:47pm PT
Trump will keep or expand his lead.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:52pm PT
Agreed HFCS. Trump one by default again.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 15, 2015 - 08:57pm PT
Trump was his usual ignorant, thin-skinned self, which means his ignorant, thin-skinned supporters will love it.

I hope they nominate him or Cruz. Hillary beats those 2 fearmongers easily. Both of them are threats to the country.

Bush or Rubio are the only 2 that can keep it close. Bush had the best night of the bunch, followed by Rubio.

The GOP's day of reckoning is coming. Can't wait.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Dec 15, 2015 - 09:16pm PT
It's interesting to see how the tone of the GOP has changed since the last Bush-Gore debate of the 2000 presidential campaign.

Bush was sweetly, as a "compasionate conservative," arguing for the U.S. to not be Policeman to the world.

Obviously 9/11/2001 changed his mind, and the Republican party.

GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH: I’m not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say this is the way it’s got to be. We can help. And maybe it’s just our difference in government, the way we view government. I mean I want to empower people. I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do. I just don’t think it’s the role of the United States to walk into a country and say, we do it this way, so should you.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics-july-dec00-for-policy_10-12/
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 15, 2015 - 09:39pm PT
I know it would remove a lot of back-and-forth banter keeping this thread going, but if a defender of the CP21 Agreement could describe what happens to a signatory that fails to meet the goals specified, that would be a good start.

It would also be interesting to know what happens if any of the estimated 55 countries that need some sort of ratification fail to obtain that ratification.

My view, based on the summaries I've read, is that this looks more like belling the cat than accomplishing its goal. I've seen a lot of comparisons to Kennedy's call to land a man on the moon. Part of that comparison seems apt to me: the goal is out there. Part of that comparison doesn't fit, however: the cost of sending a man to the moon, compared with the cost of sufficient carbon reduction to reduce earth's temperature by 1.5 degrees celcius, is rather like comparing the cost of building a play house to the cost of building Versailles.

John, let me throw you this: What would have happened, if Kennedy had not gotten a man on the moon in the time frame?

And yet, you hold it out as a aspirational goal,,,as you should. We need such things. I suspect the answer to your underlying question is we did that, because that was all that we could get done right now.

Implicit in your reasoning, is that the global warming that is taking place is relatively trivial. In reality, it may be the most challenging thing that humans have ever faced.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 15, 2015 - 10:37pm PT
Quite the opposite, Ken. Implicit in my criticism is my observation that this agreement means nothing. The League of Nations had more substance. I resent the window dressing being played off as substance.

John
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Dec 16, 2015 - 04:49am PT
Bush Rubio ticket. Don't get cocky. Those dicks could win.
christoph benells

Trad climber
Tahoma, Ca
Dec 16, 2015 - 05:45am PT
those republicans are a bunch of whack jobs.

white christians with guns are far more dangerous than ISIS.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 06:24am PT
Only 327 days until the American voters send these conservative hate-mongers into the trash heap of history.

pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 16, 2015 - 06:27am PT


Cant wait for this Saturday dems debate..
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:04am PT
Dam.... I watched the whole thing.... It was like watching supertopo.


High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:20am PT
Pyro, that's disgusting. Please show some class and remove it.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:23am PT
Yes, it was Guyman.

Sadly, I know more about the topic they were debating, and I'm an idiot and I wouldn't vote for me.

"We need to bomb them more!"

"I'll monitor the bad guys!"

Gee, why didn't Obama think of this stuff?

The truth is, that short of sending in ground troops, and tinkering here and there, we probably can't do a whole lot more to combat ISIS. There is always going to be a bit of danger.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:30am PT
We can do a few things Dirt. Like really toughen up the standards for who we allow into this country. Put together a real coalition to choke off all Islamic extremists- nothing in and nothing out of most of the middle east and parts of North Africa . Eventually given extreme isolation the so called moderates will take care of their own mess or starve in squalor.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:33am PT
So who's your man at this point, Rick. Do you have one?
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:35am PT
Cruz. Liked Paul and Huckabee but they don't have a chance in hell.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:37am PT
Huckabee, like Carson, is a fundamentalist.
That's not a deal breaker for you?
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:47am PT

Dec 15, 2015 - 08:43pm PT
I have to admit CNN did a masterful job of marginalizing the Republican field as warmongers

There was no marginalizing required.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:52am PT
Huck would put the job far above his religion and bring the country together with good natured humor. As far as the losers hanging on just to fill a war chest to enrich freinds, family, and pet causes, I wouldn't say that is the motive of all. A few maybe, but others are looking for a twist of fate to propel them into a competitive position. Stranger things have happened in politics, even in recent history.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:57am PT
He's not running to win, however. Most of them are not. So what ARE they doing?

Book tours (Carson) or auditioning for gigs as panelists on Faux News.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:59am PT
Might be too much substance and boring "policy talk" for ya, pyromaniac

No way I will be there to watch..



Pyro, that's disgusting. Please show some class and remove it.

High Fructose Corn Spirit

please show some class and add some CONTENT to ur profile maybe then I'll remove the Hillary sh#t pic..
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:00am PT
The funny thing about evolution.

(I.e., evolution taught in schools. Remember that dust up? Hello Ks. Hello PA. Hello TX)

It's not vital knowledge.

And yet it is.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:04am PT
Huck would put the job far above his religion

Many of his policy proposals suggest he would do exactly the opposite.

Remember his Kim Davis ass-kissing last summer?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:34am PT
BOTTOM OF THE CLASS12.16.15

The Surrealist Republican Debate Scorecard
A debate about foreign policy in which no actual treaties were discussed. A debate about the most dangerous threats to America and no discussion of home-grown terrorists. A debate about national security that didn’t delve into the costs of war. A nonsensical debate demands a surrealist scorecard.

Lindsey Graham
Style: B+

Went through all the vocal and emotional registers available to Southern men (a lot) to prove how much he cares about 1) beating Trump and 2) invading ISIS territory. Don’t believe he’s for real? To prove his seriousness, he’s going to come by each and every voter’s house and hold up a boombox to serenade them—probably with recordings of artillery fire.

Substance: D

Personally apologized to “our Muslim friends” for Trump. Personally thanked the Muslims serving in the U.S. military. Introduced the “Princess Buttercup Doctrine.” Inveighed against the religious tests for immigrants! On the other hand: Wishes Dubya was still president.

Overall: A lollipop stuck to the seat of a seersucker suit.

George Pataki
Style: D

As the least interesting of the three blue-state governors left, he is an especially tall walking redundancy. Kind of like “the Freedom Tower, a symbol of our freedom.”

Substance: D

Against banning Muslims, for spying on Muslims. Introduced the parallel between Trumpism and the 19th century Know-Nothings, but didn’t explain why that was bad.

Overall: A fly trapped between window panes (with a view of the Freedom Tower).

Rick Santorum
Style: D

Spoke in stilted, staccato phrases, spat out of a lipless slash. He is not enjoying this one bit. Not one bit.

Substance: D-

Grimaced and shook his head during a brief, weird tangent into the fitness of women to serve in combat: Ew, girls! Is all for religious liberty as long as it doesn’t mean tolerating other people’s religions.

Overall: Under-ripe banana.

Mike Huckabee
Style: C-

Running to be the president of Cracker Barrel, perhaps will settle for Secretary of Folksy or Ambassador to Aphorism.

Substance: F+

Mostly execrable policy positions leavened with admirable if random rant against millennials and their desire for health care and, you know, freedom. Ingrates.

Overall: Grandpa farts.

Jeb Bush
Style: B-

Brought his one-liners and a spare spine! Formerly a paint swatch for “colorless,” showed some genuine relish in needling Trump.

Substance: C-

He bravely questioned the wisdom of assassinating the civilian family members of terrorists. We are at that point in the process when, compared to the wackadoodles, Bush’s bloodless, establishment conservatism seems rational rather than simply tired.

Overall: That nagging sense you’ve forgotten to turn off the stove.

Carly Fiorina
Style: C

Can list Apple products and date of introduction with great precision if to little point; wore an enormous cross necklace because vampires, probably. Occasionally tried to shout things about unity when things got messy and thus showed at least a passing familiarity with diplomacy, the supposed topic of the debate.

Substance: D

She remembers the 9/11 attacks! She remembers it hard.

Overall: Biting down on aluminum foil.

Marco Rubio
Style: B-

It’s bittersweet to watch a child star grow up in the public eye; the Haley Joel Osment of the GOP is finally out of the awkward tween years and seems both less stiff and more assured when he spouts his chickenhawk surveillance-state nonsense.

Substance: C-

Showed some impressive slipperiness in engaging Cruz on “amnesty” for undocumented aliens, something neither of them support right now, but a point that matters a lot for the party’s large xenophobe faction. Hopes to terrify people into supporting bulk data collection.

Overall: Realizing that the music you grew up with now qualifies as “oldies.”

Ted Cruz
Style: D+

Smiles like the villain in a SyFy movie, which is to say, like a human-lizard hybrid. Oozes an oily substance that can be mistaken for sincerity in bad lighting.

Substance: D

Got exactly what he needed out of the night: Trump’s approval, despite having a relatively small sliver of actual policy overlap when it comes to non-wall-building issues. Wants to carpet-bomb “wherever ISIS is,” but selectively, so that it doesn’t sound as bad.

Overall: A triangle whose angles add up to more than 180 degrees, a mirror that reflects no light.

Ben Carson
Style: D

Asked to begin with a moment of silence, which turned out to be a preview for his performance.

Substance: F

Repeatedly called for “boots on the ground,” a euphemism that can make it easy to forget that the boots are worn by living humans—but, fortunately, was grilled about his specific willingness to murder innocent children in the course of making war. He is very willing!

Overall: Worthless nutritional “supplements.”

Donald Trump
Style: A+

Why the f*#k not? He was 100 percent Trump, 100 percent of the time. Sarah Palin word salad in a baggy suit and spray-on tan, he plans to govern via reaction GIF.

Substance: F-

He talks about foreign policy like the guy who gives directions to the taxi driver, loudly and slowly in case the driver doesn’t speak English. Doesn’t tip. Wants to kill innocent people and shut down the Internet, not necessarily in that order. Has been accused of not knowing what “the nuclear triad” is, but, on the other hand: “The power and the devastation are very important to me.”

Overall: Dogshit ground into your living room carpet.

John Kasich
Style: D

Shouty, with enormous flipper hands. Would be a better Left Shark if wore the costume.

Substance: D

Something Ohio something something.

Overall: [this space intentionally left blank]

Chris Christie
Style: C-

He’s just a straight-talking guy here to straight-talk to you about some straight talk! Enough with this yakkity yakking, what do you think this is, a debate?

Substance: D

Why debate civil rights issues when you can just arrest some people, listen to some phone calls, close down ISIS’s bridges? Dismissed conversation about the limits of data collection as “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin,” forgetting that the pin in question goes straight through the Constitution, the angels are civil liberties, and, most importantly, he has no real foreign policy experience.

Overall: Stale marshmallows.

Rand Paul
Style: C-

In the nasally tone of the guy comparing the world-building in Battlestar Galactica to that of Game of Thrones, Rand Paul is going to make sure you know he knows more than you. Or at least that he thinks he knows more than you. Almost everything is a “fundamental question of our time,” including what he had for lunch.

Substance: C-

Got in a Bridgegate joke; can’t believe he’s losing to these statist blowhards.

Overall: Hair crisp with gel.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/16/the-surrealist-gop-debate-scorecard.html
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:35am PT
Many of his policy proposals suggest he would do exactly the opposite.

Remember his Kim Davis ass-kissing last summer?

He took a stand for religious freedom.

Outrageous!!!
dirtbag

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:49am PT
Yes it was outrageous. He was catering to his right wing, bible thumping constituency. He did exactly what Rick said he wouldn't do.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:51am PT
Style: A+
Substance: F-



lol
dirtbag

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:52am PT
And Edward, Kim Davis is as free as she ever was to hate gays. God bless America! She just can't use her official post to act illegally.

But huck thinks she should be able to use her government post to promote her theocratic views.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 09:02am PT
Not that Huck has a chance, and therefore a defense of him is misplaced, but you guys are confusing appealing to the candidates base constituency with governance style and substance. Look at Huck's terms as governor for indication of job performance.

I understand the confusion of you guys however. You're confusing Obama's fundamentalist ideology and strict adherence to said ideology in all aspects of his governance as the norm. It is not.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 09:25am PT
If his "fundamentalist ideology" helped put the $2.09/gal. gas in my tank this morning, shoot, I'm all for it. More! Hell, Gingrich only promised $2.50/gal.
Don't drill, baby, don't drill.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 10:37am PT
Dam.... I watched the whole thing.... It was like watching supertopo.

Now that's a low blow to SuperTopo. For the last many election cycles, I've found the "debates" a monumental waste of time at best, and deceptive at worst. All that matters is TV style. There's neither time nor interest in substance.

If all I did was watch debates, I'd think Carly Fiorina would make a good president. How much more damning can I be than that?

John
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 10:40am PT
On plus side, Christie said he would shoot down Russian planes violating a no-fly zone over a foreign country. I feel safer already.
John M

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 10:48am PT
I agree that 30 second sound bytes don't allow for much substance. I watch the debates to see how they carry themselves. I agree also that if I only watched debates, then Fiorina would be higher then she is, but I don't only watch debates.

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:08am PT
I must say, I've enjoyed the much more reasoned discussion of the last couple of pages.

Not that Huck has a chance, and therefore a defense of him is misplaced, but you guys are confusing appealing to the candidates base constituency with governance style and substance. Look at Huck's terms as governor for indication of job performance.

This is a very dangerous assumption. The perfect example is GW Bush. He was, by most accounts, a good and moderate governor, who reached across the isle and did many things in a bipartisan way. He was thought well of by state democrats.

But we know what happened.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:12am PT
I find solace that the oath of office for officers in the us military has no requirement to obey orders, only to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

These looneys might keep that in mind.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:13am PT
Quite the opposite, Ken. Implicit in my criticism is my observation that this agreement means nothing. The League of Nations had more substance. I resent the window dressing being played off as substance.

John

Spoken like a lawyer. So what you are saying, is that because there is no enforceable contract (how exactly does one do that in this circumstance?), the leaders of various countries word is meaningless?

Has it been meaningless for the US? I think one can point to many things that the US is trying to do to alter the curve. Plus, there is additional fallout.....California has met the Kyoto Treaty thresholds.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:18am PT
This is a very dangerous assumption. The perfect example is GW Bush. He was, by most accounts, a good and moderate governor, who reached across the isle and did many things in a bipartisan way. He was thought well of by state democrats.

But we know what happened.

I'd be curious on your take of what happened. My own is that in the first two years of his presidency, he acted in a largely bipartisan manner. He made a point of including Democrats whenever he praised governmental action that went right. Then, in the midterm elections, the Republicans gained seats, which is unusual. The party holding the White House usually loses seats in the midterms. This caused the Democrats to replace their leadership with Reid and Pelosi, whose mission was to sabotage G.W. at every turn, which they proceeded to do.

The Republicans have responded in kind; oddly, led by back benchers rather than their more moderate congressional leaders. They already claimed one victim in Boehner. Already, the Heritage Foundation wages a hate campaign against McConnell and Ryan because they have the temerity to negotiate with the Democrats. Meanwhile, the Democrats' top two presidential candidates say the nation's biggest enemies are the Republicans.

I believe it was Madison, in The Federalist No. 10 who spoke of the danger from the "violence of faction." While the political rhetoric of the late 18th and early 19th centuries had far more vitriol than today, Madison's warning seems more apt in the 21st century.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:28am PT
Let's see...first Black president sworn in 2009. Tea Party movement begins a few months later. Their God, Rush Limbaugh, says on Inauguration Day and every day thereafter, "I hope he fails". Marching orders delivered and received. Cooperation is now the 3rd rail.

They live under the myth that they lost in '12 by being too moderate. They are in for a rude awakening.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:44am PT
Has it been meaningless for the US? ".......

California has met the Kyoto Treaty thresholds.


California is the number 2 state in the union in CO2 emmisions, behind only Texas.

Per capita looks great, at 9.18 metric tons per capita, which is half the national average, until you match it against other countries.

The California average is 1.5 times the country we love to vilify as carbon polluters, China.

If Californians halved their per capita emissions, they would match Argentina. Halve it again for Uruguay.

And I don't see where California does better than any EU countries except Luxembourg.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 16, 2015 - 11:59am PT
I'd be curious on your take of what happened. My own is that in the first two years of his presidency, he acted in a largely bipartisan manner. He made a point of including Democrats whenever he praised governmental action that went right. Then, in the midterm elections, the Republicans gained seats, which is unusual. The party holding the White House usually loses seats in the midterms. This caused the Democrats to replace their leadership with Reid and Pelosi, whose mission was to sabotage G.W. at every turn, which they proceeded to do.

I would summarize what happened in two words: Karl Rove. As I understand it, Rove was the first purely political operative who was assigned a office close to the President in the West Wing. I think I also have to bow to Cheney, who I think had extraordinary influence over Bush, and had a "take over the world" agenda. I think these two, (and others) changed Bush's direction of thought.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:02pm PT
California is the number 2 state in the union in CO2 emmisions, behind only Texas.

Per capita looks great, at 9.18 metric tons per capita, which is half the national average, until you match it against other countries.

The California average is 1.5 times the country we love to vilify as carbon polluters, China.

Of course, Cal is #2, it is the most populous state.

California is part of a first world nation, China is not. what everyone worries about is what happens as China modernizes?
John M

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:05pm PT
This caused the Democrats to replace their leadership with Reid and Pelosi, whose mission was to sabotage G.W. at every turn, which they proceeded to do.

interesting take..

Mine is that they tried to slow down the rush to war, but ultimately went along. What have the republicans gone along with under Obama? Plus, tried to slow the roll on the patriot act, but also ultimately went along. Then Bush became manic with his "you are either for us or against us" speech.

Hopefully others will express their take.

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:16pm PT
California is part of a first world nation, China is not. what everyone worries about is what happens as China modernizes?

Last I checked, the U.K., France, Germany, and the rest of the EU are first World Nations. Several have higher standards of living than CA.

As China modernizes, it's doing better than California did as it "modernized".
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:32pm PT
he might end up in the big house, just not the one he was hoping to be in.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/12/16/ted-cruz-investigation-possibly-leaking-classified-information-debate.html
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:47pm PT
DMT makes a good point about the difficulty in comparing standards of living. The comparison depends on what you desire. If one compares housing, for example, Californians -- particularly those who live inland -- are on a rarefied plain, compared with Germany, Austria, or most of the rest of Europe.

In a way, it reminds me of trying to rate various cities for quality of life. Do bowling alleys per capita matter as much as softball diamonds per capita, for example? Do you want easy access to ice fishing several months of the year?

We can compare income per capita (usually by comparing per capita GDP), but that doesn't really tell us all about what we have. It reminds me of a job offer I received from a Wall Street law firm when I was in law school. The hiring partner, in answer to my question about why New York salaries were so much greater than those in L.A. at the time, said, in effect, "You need to understand that you will have a high income, but that largely means that you will also have a heavy tax bill and big living expenses." Considering that he spent about three hours daily in his car, on the bus, on the train, and on the subway, commuting between his home in Connecticut and his office on Wall Street, it was easy to see what he meant.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 12:50pm PT
Cruz is the one guy who I don't like. He is a politician through and through.

To me, he is a Republican Obama. He shows no ability to work with opponents, no ability to compromise, but an unhealthy readiness to make a big show that will produce nothing but discord. That's why the Tea Party - with largely the same values - loves him.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 16, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
John, where exactly has Obama not compromised? I mean I appreciate your status as the voice of reason given the tone of most of your conservative compatriots on the Taco, but sometimes you say things that are a little coocoo. You can't compromise with people whose ultimate demand that you have never had been elected. One of Obama's biggest failures in practice was that he tried to be the great uniter so he persistently started negotiating from an already compromised position, expecting that the public would see how reasonable he was being. This only ever drove Republicans further to the right. Obama is anything but an unyielding champion of liberalism. I understand you don't agree with him..but that's different than "not compromising." Obama and Boehner worked out numerous bargains...they were all sunk by Freedom Caucus.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 01:26pm PT
Where has he compromised with Republicans? I could argue that Republicans' exclusion from the ACA negotiations was more the product of Pelosi ("Elections have consequences.") and Reid, but Obama did nothing to include them. He certainly has done nothing since.

More importantly, his rhetoric often pours gasoline on the flames. You don't obtain compromise by villifying the other side, and then insisting they surrender, yet that's what he's done all too often. Where, exactly, has he been conciliatory to his political opposition? It seems, to this admittedly very partial observer, that Obama never misses a chance to demonize his opposition. To me, the most egregious were his lies about the majority opinion in Citizens United in the State of the Union address, knowing that the Supreme Court justices have no ability to defend themselves. That was bullying plain and simple, and not actions designed to lead to dialog, much less compromise.

The immigration issues have an awful lot of Republicans in favor of immigration reform that allows those here illegally a path to legal status, but his executive order cut the floor out from under those that were potential supporters.

As was pointed out earlier, when Bill Clinton's leftish agenda lost the House and Senate to Republicans, he steered a more moderate course. When Obama's leftish agenda did the same, he doubled down on his leftward tilt. Again, you can't insist on unconditional surrender and then complain when your opponents continue the fight.

John
Norton

Social climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 01:32pm PT
5 Ways Obama Tries to Work With Republicans and is Rejected

http://mic.com/articles/22662/5-ways-obama-tries-to-work-with-republicans-and-is-rejected#.VbLd49750
Norton

Social climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 01:32pm PT
What Happens When Obama Tries To Compromise With The GOP


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/01/what-happens-when-obama-tries-to-compromise-wit/196189
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:07pm PT
5 Ways Obama Tries to Work With Republicans and is Rejected

That's pretty funny. Health care: "President listens to Republicans." It's a curious definition of "listens," considering their total exclusion fromthe bill's drafting and the inability of the bill to attract a single Republican vote.

"Obama compromises on fiscal cliff [2013]" by raising the threshold of tax hikes to $400,000.00, rather than the $250,000 that he wanted. This looks like a true compromise. Republicans wanted no tax hikes, and held the majoirty in the tax-writing chamber of Congress, yet the tax hikes still took place. Of course, this not only undercuts my statement about Obama's inability to compromise, but it undercuts the arguments that the Republicans won't compromise with him. Oh, well.

"Obama compromises on 2010 budget deal." That was a compromise with himself. he didn't want the Bush tax cuts to continue, but his policy advisors told him the damage that would do to the economy if he followed through on what he wanted to do. I doubt he would have received enough votes from Democrats to pass a tax hike then.

"Obama keeps Gates as Secretary of Defense." Who else did he have in mind?

"Obama meets with pro-life and pro-choice advocates." And what has he offered pro-life advocates as a result of that meeting. For that matter, is this solely a Democrat/Republican controversy?

Yes, I do consider the Freedom Caucus at least as obstructionist of compromise as the President, maybe more so because they purport to be on my side. Still, that's rather weak sauce for showing a President with the ability to compromise with the opposition, particularly when compared to his predecessors.

John

Edit: The Media Matters article on false equivalence in the blame for the sutdown is even more specious, but then what should I expect from an overtly partisan commentary? Should I counter with posts from the Daily Signal?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:11pm PT
He certainly has done nothing since.

wait hold on it's all about the environment and climate change..

edit:

Should I counter with posts from the Daily Signal?

lol
Jorroh

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:17pm PT
"Where has he compromised with Republicans?"

Lets start with Obamacare...do you think there is a single Democrat that would have chosen as their first option an approach to health care developed by the Heritage foundation, first implemented by a Republican Governor, where health care remained, for most people, mediated by insurance companies? With no public option.
Are you really trying to say that that wasn't a compromise?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:33pm PT
John, where exactly has Obama not compromised?

He set the tone early on.

President Obama listened to Republican gripes about his stimulus package during a meeting with congressional leaders Friday morning - but he also left no doubt about who's in charge of these negotiations. "I won," Obama noted matter-of-factly, according to sources familiar with the conversation.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2009/01/obama-to-gop-i-won-017862#ixzz3uWfDOEx4

If Obamacare was a compromise, what did Obama and the Dems get out of the deal?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:37pm PT
Revisionist history is a conservative's best friend.

The fact is 60% of republicans feel betrayed because their leadership isn't conservative ENOUGH. They think Mitch McConnell is a liberal. Day 1 his goal was to defeat any initiative proposed by the president.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:41pm PT
Revisionist history is a conservative's best friend.

What are you referring to?

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:42pm PT
Your hypothesis that the president set the tone early on for non-cooperation. By the way, the liberal wing of his party faults him for being too conciliatory.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 02:57pm PT
The azz hole set the putrid tone before even swearing in in 2009 when his transition team let slip their consideration that the biggest threat facing their amerika was what they defined as right wing extremists (basically anyone in disagreement with any of his agenda as you nutcases demonstrate daily) and returning vets. The turd basically declared war on the majority of the population of traditional America.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 16, 2015 - 03:02pm PT
Hypothesis?

You mean he didn't snub the Republicans... three days after taking office... over the most significant legislation of his first year?

That explains why all the House Republicans and nearly all of the Senate Republicans voted against the 2009 stimulus bill. I mean... it was a compromise.

Speaking of revisionism, it's interesting to see how you guys claim Obama compromised on major legistion, where the Republican opposition was nearly unanimous.

We must have different definitions of the term compromise.
Jorroh

climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 03:05pm PT
"If Obamacare was a compromise, what did Obama and the Dems get out of the deal?"

They got to expand healthcare coverage.
They were able to slap insurance companies with a few consumer protections to make them actually provide the coverage that their customers were paying for.
They were able to try various approaches, both nationally and at the state level, whose goal was to bend the cost curve of health care.
To name a couple.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 03:35pm PT
don't think California is ready to compete with Germany for emissions. We have too many diesel VWs for one thing. :) And to be frank, I do NOT trust the Germans to self-report the truth of their emissions, the lying f*#ks.

Hah. I hear ya, but part of the California emissions figures were based on the vw cheating, so it doesn't help the numbers.

But Germany isn't out of line with the rest of the EU.


As to the deserts and such, I'm not sure how they add to CO2 emmisions. Roads, maybe. But that's a decision CA made in the thirties when they dismantled the largest transit systems in the world.

As an aside, the largest per capita emissions in the USA are in Wyoming. New York is the lowest.

Oregon is about what California is. Part of this states problem is that the EPA thresholds don't kick in to require cleaner fuels. Oregon has no refineries, so they used to send poor quality fuels with Benzene in it here and save the good stuff for California and the Seattle area where EPA limits for that pollutant were in effect.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 03:51pm PT
You mean he didn't snub the Republicans... three days after taking office... over the most significant legislation of his first year?

You are making crap up.

There was no Obama veto in the first three days. Congress didn't have the votes.


There were only two vetos in the first term. One was to veto the tea party idiot continuing budgetst that forced the tea party to actually vote a budget. That was sustained in the house. The second was to veto an interstate commerce limit, also sustained in the house.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 16, 2015 - 04:08pm PT

why do you find it necessary to LIE to try real hard to make a political point?

a lie is when you say something that is simply not true

so why did you lie?
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Dec 16, 2015 - 04:16pm PT
Yea right like any R was ever going to vote for ACA regardless of how much Dems tried to comprise. Besides having a chance to "break" Obama,any R that voted for health care was the walking dead. Maybe literally given all the Tea Party anger.
Dems should have pushed it through faster before they lost the Ted Kennedy seat.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 04:32pm PT
All I can say is there must be something about Wasilla, AK that induces ignorance. Such a pretty place, too.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 16, 2015 - 04:40pm PT
Color me anxious!!!!


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dhs-secretary-jeh-johnson-unveils-revised-terror-alert/story?id=35790668
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 16, 2015 - 05:00pm PT
Yeah we ignore idiot pissant's such as yourself Cranksore. I had to LOL on your recent post attributing low gas prices (and why in the hell aren't you plugging in an EV rather than gassing up anyway) to Obama and your " don't drill baby drill" ignorant statement. Truth be told the moronic progressive rabid enviro movement along with the dear leader have succeeded in slowing FF procurement on Fed land, but this slowdown was dwarfed by a huge increase of extraction on private and state land. So, thank forward thinking Americans and to lesser extent the Saudi's economic jihad against our FF industry for your cheap gas. Ironically this is the polar opposite of the "energy prices will necessarily skyrocket" promise of the jihadist in chief.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 05:15pm PT
Yeah we ignore idiot pissant's such as yourself Cranksore. I had to LOL on your recent post attributing low gas prices (and why in the hell aren't you plugging in an EV rather than gassing up anyway) to Obama and your " don't drill baby drill" ignorant statement. Truth be told the moronic progressive rabid enviro movement along with the dear leader have succeeded in slowing FF procurement on Fed land, but this slowdown was dwarfed by a huge increase of extraction on private and state land. So, thank forward thinking Americans and the Saudi's economic jihad against our FF industry for your cheap gas. Ironically this is the polar opposite of the "energy prices will necessarily skyrocketing" promise of the jihadist in chief.

I'm sure you think you made a point. But I tried to read this from a right wing tea party crankloon point of view and it made no sense. Then I tried from a liberal Marxist Isis loving point of view and it still made no sense.

Try using proper nouns and maybe we can translate into English. Who, for example, are forward thinking Americans?

In the thirties, that would have been Prescott Bush(American Nazi) or the IWW ( American Communist)
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Dec 16, 2015 - 05:16pm PT

a lie is when you say something that is simply not true

so why did you lie?

Norton, I think you're having very hard time understanding what a lie is.
I had to inform you of the definition when we were talking about Hillary's lying a while ago--you got confused then, and I see you're still confused.
A lie is not just when you say something that isn't true. That's being wrong. Lying has a "state of mind" component.
(By the way I'm not even sure what the issue is here, just Norton's post reminded me of when he was confused in the past, so I'm trying to help him out.)
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 06:11pm PT
Hahahaha.

Let us know what Obama blocked or "snubbed" in the first three days.


You got nothing but a vivid imagination.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 16, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
Hahahaha.

Let us know what Obama blocked in the first three days.

You got nothing but a vivid imagination.

You can't be serious. You're just trolling, right?

I asked for specifics.

What are you talking about, specifically?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Dec 16, 2015 - 07:14pm PT
I don't normally think much about what political candidates look like, unless they are grossly fat. However in last night's debate I kept focusing on Marco Rubio's ears, which the CNN cameras also seemed to emphasize.

His ears seemed hugely out of proportion, like if he worked on it, he could fly with them ------- like Dumbo the Flying Elephant.

Wouldn't that be awesome!


So------his home-state newspapers have noticed those elegant ears too.

http://blogs.tallahassee.com/for-rubio-its-all-about-his-ears-sweating-and-drinking-too-much-water/

For Rubio, it’s all about his ears, sweating and drinking too much water
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:00pm PT
Hey, Dick Sumner, the turn to hard, rightwing bigotry, is this new? Were you always this way? I'm interested in how Americans get radicalized.

You just referred to the President of the United States as an "azzhole" and a "turd". Classy. If you use these terms on a public forum, one can only wonder what terms you use amongst your like-minded friends.

Just enjoy the low gas prices. And knowing ANWR is protected.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 16, 2015 - 08:20pm PT


I asked for specifics.

What are you talking about, specifically?


You mean he didn't snub the Republicans... three days after taking office... over the most significant legislation of his first year?


Ok, that's pretty specific. It has to be three days, and it has to be a significant piece of legislation, and he has to have snubbed them.


There was no significant legislation proposed or voted on in the first three days by either a Democrats or Republicans. Legislation is a specific word.

Here's day 3 in the congressional record.
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2009/01/23


From the Congressional record
Senate Jan 23 "Chamber Action
The Senate was not in session today. It will next meet at 2 p.m. on
Monday, January 26, 2009.
"

House Jan 23: "The House met at 12 noon and adjourned at 12:03 p.m."


Day 1 was inauguration. Day 2 was votes swearing in new members . Day 3 was committee apportionments and day 4 a three minute house session. . Then a 2 day break.



The first significant legislation I see is the 26th. (Day 6) which was a proposal on the floor to make the day National Data Privacy day. Are you saying he snubbed republicans over that?

So tell us what SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATION there was in the FIRST THREE DAYS. You have the link to the Congressional record.

Specifics is a bitch. This isn't FOX News.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 17, 2015 - 04:44am PT
Ok, that's pretty specific. It has to be three days, and it has to be a significant piece of legislation, and he has to have snubbed them.

“Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won.” – President Obama to House Republican Whip Eric Cantor, January 23, 2009.

This^ occurred during a meeting of Obama and congressional leaders, about the stimulus package. At the time, I believe it was dismissed as a minor banter, until Republicans learned they would be excluded from writing the bill.

Obama campaigned on having a "post partisan" Presidency. Then, three days in, he responds to GOP concerns with "Elections have consequences". "I won" and "I trump you". Then, House Repubs found out they had zero input on the stimulus bill.

Obama gets full credit for alienating the GOP, right off the bat.

Where has Obama not compromised? Just look at his two largest pieces of legislation.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 17, 2015 - 06:59am PT
Calling Fritz for a physical description of Michael Moore.
Gary

Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
Dec 17, 2015 - 11:04am PT
GOP adds $650 billion to the deficit.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-congress-budget-20151217-story.html
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 17, 2015 - 11:52am PT
Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won.” – President Oba


That's it? That's the big legislative snub in the first three days? It's the winner of an election reminding the losers they will have to deal with him. It's called reality.

Your memory of post election declarations must be pretty dim. Here's GWB's first meeting with reporters after the 2004 election. He won both elections by smaller margins than Obama did.



Bush claims mandate, sets 2nd-term"
Bush staked his claim to a broad mandate and announced his top priorities at a post-election news conference, saying his 3.5 million vote victory had won him political capital that he would spend enacting his conservative agenda.

"I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it," Bush told reporters. "It is my style."

There have been whole papers on the phenomenon of the claimed mandate. Here's the start of one going back to 1983 talking about the mandate Reagan claimed in 1980

http://web.grinnell.edu/courses/pol/f02/pol101-02/Dahl%20-%20Myth%20of%20the%20Presidential%20Mandate.pdf

It's a fact of presidential politics that the winner claims right to set the agenda. It has happened in every election I remember in my lifetime, even when results were razor thin. In this case, Obama got more than 51% of the vote both times, by greater margins than either bush, or than Reagan got.

Here's an article that records all the past claims from past presidents, and says it's the only legitimate way to start office.

http://www.thenation.com/article/president-can-and-must-claim-mandate-govern/

So your claim of a big snub on major legislations here days after is bunk. There wasn't yet any legislation either proposed or voted on . It's part of the kabuki that happens after every election.
And it is You trying to deny mandate the president had. Weak sauce.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 17, 2015 - 11:56am PT
Lorenzo, sometimes I get this image of you as Sisyphus.


Except it's steaming pile of diarrhoeal glop you're pushing, honorably, with the appropriate broadscoop shovel of logic, again and again.

Don't forget your redbull and a happy Teutonic love for ceaseless labor
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:05pm PT
Well, well, it appears that the politicians finally decided to work together after all. The budget deal has enough in it to infuriate both the Freedom Caucus and the reactionary left. In other words, the centrists finally won. It's about time.

John
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:14pm PT
That's it? That's the big legislative snub in the first three days? It's the winner of an election reminding the losers they will have to deal with him. It's called reality.

Your memory of post election declarations must be pretty dim. Here's GWB's first meeting with reporters after the 2004 election. He won both elections by smaller margins than Obama did.

Bush claims mandate, sets 2nd-term"
Bush staked his claim to a broad mandate and announced his top priorities at a post-election news conference, saying his 3.5 million vote victory had won him political capital that he would spend enacting his conservative agenda.

"I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it," Bush told reporters. "It is my style."

There have been whole papers on the phenomenon of the claimed mandate. Here's the start of one going back to 1983 talking about the mandate Reagan claimed in 1980

http://web.grinnell.edu/courses/pol/f02/pol101-02/Dahl%20-%20Myth%20of%20the%20Presidential%20Mandate.pdf

It's a fact of presidential politics that the winner claims right to set the agenda. It has happened in every election I remember in my lifetime, even when results were razor thin. In this case, Obama got more than 51% of the vote both times, by greater margins than either bush, or than Reagan got.

Here's an article that records all the past claims from past presidents, and says it's the only legitimate way to start office.

http://www.thenation.com/article/president-can-and-must-claim-mandate-govern/

So your claim of a big snub on major legislations here days after is bunk. There wasn't yet any legislation either proposed or voted on . It's part of the kabuki that happens after every election.
And it is You trying to deny mandate the president had. Weak sauce.

You do go on. So defensive. Tsk, tsk.

What I said was accurate.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:15pm PT
Haha. The cowboy expanding on bullsh#t.

Priceless.

I suppose Obama was supposed to go hat in hand to the losers and asked what legislation he could pass for them.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:16pm PT
What I said was accurate.

yeah, except for the snub, the Republican legislation, and that either was in the first three days. He was countering their snub of his stimulus package.


He didn't do anything Bush or Reagan didn't do.

http://www.politico.com/story/2009/01/obama-to-gop-i-won-017862

I
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:22pm PT
yeah, except for the snub, the legislation, and that either was in the first three days.

Really? Even when I spell it out, you keep denying the obvious.

Keep those blinders on, sport.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Dec 17, 2015 - 12:27pm PT
oh! the melanin thing, that was it right Edward?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 07:11am PT
Looks like the omnibus is easily passing in the House. Time for Ted Cruz to jump into action!
dirtbag

climber
Dec 18, 2015 - 07:24am PT
An opening for Rubio, perhaps?

It looks like Cruz has been playing flippy-floppy on immigration all along.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/12/ted_cruz_has_lied_about_immigration.html
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 07:34am PT
Debt is cheap as hell right now. We should have more of it. Had the government taken on an appropriate amount of debt 7 years ago we'd likely have been out of this mess years ago.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 18, 2015 - 07:39am PT
no one in congress 'cares" about adding to the national debt

and neither do the world's credit markets

the first evidence that congress gives a damn is when they cut the defense budge
by anything, even 2%

don't hold your breath, and no your grandchildren will not have to work overtime
to pay it off.....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 08:25am PT
The r/sandersforpresident group is absolutely losing their minds about this voter data access thing. It's all a conspiracy! Very entertaining stuff.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 08:40am PT
New GOP polling results are in!


http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Agrabah
dirtbag

climber
Dec 18, 2015 - 08:48am PT
Agrabahahahaha!!!

My first thought was, where the fook is Agrabah?
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Dec 18, 2015 - 08:48am PT
So what are you saying Norton? How do those ahead of us not have to pay for our excesses?

I see two ways out of it short of paying it down through an american economic expansion of history breaking duration and proportion.

A managed bankruptcy with every holder getting a crew cut. This would mainly affect the 1%, banks, wallstreet, pension funds, private funds, and soverigns. Might need an experienced hand like Trump to oversee this, but would still have unprecedented massive negative effects on all.

An endless expansion and devaluation of the dollar with everyone but the 1% getting the crewcuts (this has been happening for the last ten years at least). The problem here is that other soverigns are not going to sit idly by. Instead global monetary manipulation would be the norm with much international tension amid the economic warfare.




HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 09:27am PT
Agrabahahahaha!!!

My first thought was, where the fook is Agrabah?

At least a majority of them shared that sentiment. If there's one thing that survey revealed it's that 25% of GOP voters are truly over the cliff.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 09:27am PT
Obama never consulted Republicans about bombing Agrabah

They are holding hearings about it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 09:30am PT
I think the real question is why hasn't Obama bombed Agrabah? What is he even waiting for? More leading from behind weakness from Obummer!!!
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 09:34am PT
Ted Cruz wants to precision carpet bomb Agrabah.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 09:45am PT
I think the real question is why hasn't Obama bombed Agrabah? What is he even waiting for? More leading from behind weakness from Obummer!!!

Really. You think the answer is leveling world heritage sites?


you'll just radicalize the agrarians in this country.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 18, 2015 - 10:05am PT
That's just more politically correct wishy washyness from the radical left. Americans are sick of this "but we don't want to kill innocent children with our bombs" namby pamby garbage. If they were so innocent they would have been born in America.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Dec 18, 2015 - 10:27am PT
"If they were so innocent they would have been born in America."

HDJ is on a role.

Unfortunately there are a lot really ignorant people that believe this. The lack of empathy for the rest of the world displayed by the majority of the republican party is the reason so many people hate the US these days. But no worries, we can always bomb them into submission and make America great again.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 10:52am PT
agrarian sleeper cell training somewhere out West.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 18, 2015 - 11:05am PT
I realize the humor was at my party's expense, but whoever came up with the Agrabah bombing proposal was a genius. It reminds me of the conservatives who go on college campuses collecting signatures to repeal the First Amendment, only funnier, since repealing the First Amendment is not only possible, but in prospect for the extreme left and right.

What I do find deliciously ironic is the media's overplay of gun control in the San Bernardinao tragedy. By initially playing this as a direct product of lax gun laws, thereby hoping to increase support for gun control, it's caused a sharp increase in firearm and ammunition purchases. Perhaps some day the MSM will realize how often they hoist on their own petard.

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 11:26am PT
To be fair 14% of democrats said we should bomb Agrabah.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 18, 2015 - 11:59am PT
John, there's quite a few of your fellow countrymen who favor gun control. That view was expressed before and after the latest mass killing.

Never understand why the right disparages the media for covering these shootings. I guess some think if you ignore it, it will go away. And what is the MSM? What isn't?

The rush to buy guns after these events is because fear and hysteria, courtesy of the NRA, rules the day. Gotta get another gun before they're all gone!!

http://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/vast-majority-americans-tougher-gun-laws-poll-article-1.2454131
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 18, 2015 - 12:27pm PT
And the rush to buy guns after these events is because fear and hysteria, courtesy of the NRA, rules the day.

That's my point, crankster. It isn't just the NRA that stirs up fear and hysteria. The MSM has been stirring up fear and hysteria of gun violence, when that violence has been trending downward for years. The increase in firearm and ammunition purchases may have had help from the NRA, but the MSM's overplaying of its hand on gun violence drives the buying spurts.

Still, any hysteria regarding gun control pales compared with the fear and hysteria being stirred up regarding terrorism. I haven't tried to compute statistics, but It would surprise me if the likelihood of experiencing violence at the hands of terrorists in the U.S. is anywhere near as likely as, say, being struck by lightning in the U.S. Again, I haven't tried to compute statistics, but I suspect Muslims in America are at far greater risk of being victimized that all Americans are of being victims of Jihadist violence.

If what I suspect is true, the President's heart is in the right place, but he needs to present the case better than he has. His habit of ignoring or belittling those with whom he disagrees remains his worst enemy.

John
dirtbag

climber
Dec 18, 2015 - 12:31pm PT
I realize the humor was at my party's expense, but whoever came up with the Agrabah bombing proposal was a genius. It reminds me of the conservatives who go on college campuses collecting signatures to repeal the First Amendment, only funnier, since repealing the First Amendment is not only possible, but in prospect for the extreme left and right.


In fairness, too, some of the respondents probably got the joke and said "yes." And, I suppose it's possible that more republicans saw "Aladdin," and played along.

Still...it's a gud one! I've been chuckling all morning.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 18, 2015 - 12:42pm PT
Still...it's a gud one! I've been chuckling all morning.

Indeed. Between that poll and Daniel's (limpingcrab's) ski wax trip report, I find myself experiencing great difficulty doing anything but laughing.

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 18, 2015 - 01:21pm PT
fairness, too, some of the respondents probably got the joke and said "yes." And, I suppose it's possible that more republicans saw "Aladdin," and played along.

Admit it. You made that up.

Funny, though.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 19, 2015 - 09:37am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

LOL!
John M

climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 09:47am PT
just heard about a poll that says the number one problem facing America right now is terrorism.

Good grief.. either the pollsters are making sh#t up, or the only people who respond to polls are senior citizens stuck in centers watching tv all day.

How about..

national debt
Or Over sized military
Or insanely formed tax code.. Okay.. that ones not number one, but should be higher then terrorists.
then there is aging infrastructure.

anymore that are greater then terrorism?
John M

climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 10:15am PT
you are right Dingus.. I don't get it. I do realize thats what we do. I just don't get it. I watched america go crazy after 9/11. Its what we do. But it still bugs me. We have serious issues facing us, and we will waste energy worrying about terrorists.

America needs leaders that will lead us out of the insanity, rather then further into it.
survival

Big Wall climber
Terrapin Station
Dec 19, 2015 - 10:20am PT
John M, +1
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 11:35am PT
There's no democracy at all


+1
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 19, 2015 - 11:47am PT
Just for the post deleter



[Click to View YouTube Video]

LOL!
John M

climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 12:09pm PT
Werner is right. Crankloons like HIllary, a puppet of the oligarchy. We will never get out of this mess with Hillary.. or Cruz, or Bush, or Rubio.

Sanders in my opinion is the most sane, and even he is not that sane.

Cruz insanity.. carpet bomb isis
Bush insanity.. bigger military, more spending

What are Rubio and HIllary's biggest insanities? And while we are at it, Sanders.
John M

climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 09:30pm PT
glad you had a great year crankster.. when do you plan on paying down the national debt? Does Hillary have a plan for that? Or are you just a crankloon?
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 19, 2015 - 10:05pm PT
Sanders problem is he is a one issue candidate.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 19, 2015 - 11:01pm PT
Werner Braun is one of the most relevant voices here, if you can appreciate the stylistic duck quacks

How a Nation Self-destructs

By Harvey Lothian December 19, 2015

Nations are made up of people. Nations are only as strong as the bonds between the people. Strong social bonds, strong nation; weak social bonds, weak nation. Social bonds have many elements; the most important element is how much people care about each other. If people do not care about each other, if they have a “screw you, I got mine” attitude and are not willing to help others in need, then a nation is ready to topple at the first sign of significant stress. If people have a strong social bond, they will work together during difficult times and solve all problems.

If a nation’s leaders create enormous amounts of national debt that cannot be paid because good paying jobs have been sent overseas, a weakly bonded nation is doomed to failure when an inevitable bankruptcy and economic collapse occurs.

If just before the national bankruptcy and economic collapse the leaders frighten the people with a real or phony enemy, some people will purchase weapons to protect themselves. Should the financial and economic crash occur, a weakly bonded people might resort to using weapons against each other in an every man for himself situation.

Mission accomplished; nation destroyed.

How to Save a Nation

Open the minds of the people to the fact that everyone is in this together, everyone is different and valuable, everyone is entitled to the necessities of life, including meaningful work with reasonable pay, and all differences should be celebrated rather than fought over.

Then, follow Lao zi’s advice and do nothing and everything gets done. If the people are solidly united and bonded they do not need leaders or instructions, they will naturally do what needs to be done.

Harvey Lothian is a 78-year-old man living on the Sunshine Coast of B.C., Canada. His passions since a teenager have been history, politics, economics, sociology, social psychology, learning, traveling and reading. In recent years he has come to understand what Plato meant when he said all dogs have the soul of a philosopher. He can be reached platosdog7782@gmail.com.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 20, 2015 - 05:14am PT
I have no doubt that the poll is real, having seen results of several different polls conducted by competent statisticians, all with similar results.

I also have little (as opposed to no) doubt that the overplay of terrorism stories by the media has much to do with those results. NOAA says that during the 10-year period of 2004-2013, 33 people were killed and 234 were injured by lightning strikes annually. This far exceeds the terrorism deaths and injuries from San Bernardino, yet which receives more ink and air time, lightning deaths or terrorism?

Even so, I suspect that if all the media - of whatever bent - publicized the relative risk, people would still fear terrorism more than lightning strikes. Most people don't simply compare likelihoods alone. Otherwise, more people would be afraid of driving than afraid of flying.

My own theory is that people generally fear what they believe they can't control. They can control their likelihood of being struck by lightning by choosing where and when to place themselves. Terrorism can happen anywhere people congregate, so they feel that they can't control it.

Of course, if the economy tanks, the main issues will change. In any case, I don't see Bernie's one issue, income inequality, likely to be a particularly important issue except for the American left. The American public as a whole has never been all that big about taking other peoples' money. Their concern is about having the ability to make money on their own.

John
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 20, 2015 - 07:44am PT
John M:
Good points on our countries problems.
The national debt, aging infrastructure, tax code, unsustainable public employee pension costs and job creation in the private sector I see as our biggest problems.

John E
Good points about the media overplaying every little story to sell their product.
The republicans seem to be competing with each other on who will bomb the most terrorists.
Don't think democrats are not masters of fear mongering when it suits their purposes.


This seems to be one of the weakest choices of true leadership I have seen in my life.

For me, the problem with a democrat being elected (especially one who might belong to one of the left's cherished victim classes...a woman), is that the late night joke machines will be stagnant for yet another few years after the pathetic comedic desert conditions of the Obama years.
Too much PC nowadays...I doubt you could make the movie "Blazing Saddles" in today's atmosphere.
Our culture has become as thin skinned as our current president.

And about democracy.
It takes a culture of personal responsibility to make a democracy work.
Do you think this country values personal responsibility like it used to?
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 20, 2015 - 08:01am PT
Crankster wrote:
Sorry, but the national debt is not at the top of the list.

I guess the easy way would be to inflate our way out of it.
Just a regressive tax on the poor... but mum's the word, they're too busy watching the Kardashians.
Edit: Are they related to the Agrahbabians?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 20, 2015 - 08:02am PT
The fiscally non-responsible GOP just added another $700 billion to the debt rather than try and pay it down in the new spending bill, just proving they are a bunch of hypocritical liars about the debt.

Congress' half-trillion-dollar spending binge

Budget austerity takes a back seat as the House passes nearly $700 billion in unpaid-for tax cuts.

By Rachael Bade
| 12/17/15 05:20 AM EST

Rand Paul thinks the national debt is the “greatest threat” to America’s future. Donald Trump warns that the nation is at risk of becoming “a large-scale version of Greece.” And Marco Rubio says the debt will “shackle future generations.”

But on Capitol Hill this week, just hours before they jet away for the holidays, the GOP-led Congress is going on a $680 billion spending spree — none of which will be paid for by budget cuts or other tax offsets. And all of which will be added to the national debt, according to budget watchdogs.

“We are doing damage to the fiscal health of the country by borrowing this mind-boggling amount at a time when the debt is so high,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the bipartisan anti-debt nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “It’s absolutely at odds with the priority Republicans are making — the debt — when they’re campaigning, and with the Republican budget that was passed out of the House.”

For the GOP presidential candidates, the $18 trillion national debt remains a central campaign talking point. But after years of relative fiscal austerity, including enactment of relatively modest spending rollbacks, GOP lawmakers are steaming toward passing a mammoth $680 billion tax package without offsets. It would make permanent a host of temporary tax breaks commonly called “extenders” — and is also chock-full of goodies for specific business interests and constituents.



There’s something from everybody’s wish list: breaks for energy-efficient homes and commercial buildings; deductions for business office furniture, computers and machines; tax savings for the film and TV industries and rum producers in the Caribbean; and even tax perks for owning a racehorse or two-wheeled plug-in electric car.

The cost, combined with the interest the U.S. would pay after borrowing the money to pay for it, would rise to $830 billion and undo much of the savings squeezed from painful automatic spending cuts called the sequester, according to MacGuineas’ group. Republicans have instituted rules that block such measures unless they’re paid for — restrictions they will waive for themselves on this particular occasion.

Speaker Paul Ryan can count on strong support from Republicans to pass the measure, which he negotiated as one of his first acts since taking over the House. On Thursday, the House voted overwhelmingly, 318-108, to pass the measure, with dozens of Democrats joining Republicans to vote 'yes.' The Senate is expected to clear the bill on Friday.

It helps, perhaps, that national security issues have recently taken over the campaign spotlight, diverting some attention away from fiscal issues. But some Democrats are seizing on what they see as a disconnect between the GOP’s national platform and their end-of-year tax bill. And they’re calling the GOP hypocritical for failing to require the new spending to be offset with cuts elsewhere — particularly after spending years battling with President Barack Obama over deficits and spending cuts.

“If you’re concerned about the deficit, why do you write off all this money without an offset?” asked Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.).

Appropriations Committee member Mike Honda (D-Calif.), who often hears Republicans on his panel balk at spending for Democratic priorities, said reading the tax deal was “like being in a candy store.”

“I’m not voting for it,” he said. “There are so many things in there that raise astounding [amounts of] debt.”

Almost every year, Congress passes a series of what were supposed to be “temporary” tax breaks mostly aimed at businesses, including breaks for corporate research and development, wind and solar energy, railroad track maintenance and motor-sports equipment. But tax experts have long maintained that the year-by-year extensions are bad policymaking because they leave businesses guessing whether their provisions will be extended that year, adding uncertainty and making it more difficult to plan for the future.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/congress-spending-binge-tax-cuts-budget-deal-216883#ixzz3usRJR3RJ
John M

climber
Dec 20, 2015 - 08:04am PT
The national debt isn't at the top of the list because of what JohnE said. If you don't see it, hear it, or experience it, then it doesn't exist. Yet it does exist, and if we don't get it into control, then eventually its going to take us down. But hey, while we don't feel anything, lets PARTY !!!!..



And Crankster, if you could get past the crankloon comment, then you would see that I did pick someone I prefer. That is Bernie Sanders. I believe that he is a much more honest person then Hillary. He stands behind what he believes, whereas Hillary simply shifts with the wind. She doesn't appear to have any moral compass. That is of course my opinion and you are free to have whichever that you please.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Dec 20, 2015 - 08:07am PT
But of course, Bernie Sanders proposals of free education at a cost of $750 billion over 10 years is crazy talk.

It's all about priorities

More tax breaks for the rich, so they can get richer and more powerful
so they can pay more to the politicians

or free education
or fixing our infrastructure
or Medicare for all
or millions of new jobs at middle class wages

or more wars
more wasted money
more dirty oil paying off dirty politicians

http://www.wsj.com/articles/price-tag-of-bernie-sanders-proposals-18-trillion-1442271511


He proposes $1 trillion to repair roads, bridges and airports. His college-affordability program would cost $750 billion over a decade. Smaller programs would provide youth jobs and prevent cuts to private pension plans. He would raise an additional $1.2 trillion in Social Security taxes in order to increase benefits and pay those already promised for 50 years.





Sanders proposals are not really a extra 18 trillion price tag, since any budget over ten years is 18 Trillion, there are no extra costs, just different spending priorities and less tax cuts for the rich and Corps.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 21, 2015 - 12:23pm PT
Man who expresses interest in hurting Muslims has a bomb at his house, police explode it and nobody cares. No double standard here.


JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 21, 2015 - 01:12pm PT
I guess the easy way would be to inflate our way out of it.
Just a regressive tax on the poor

I've always assumed that inflation is the exit strategy for paying the debt when interest rates reach normal levels. At today's interest rates, we have been financing the debt by a net tax on savings. If we inflate to pay the debt, we will finance the debt by a net tax on those investing in long-term debt instruments prior to the inflation, and those on truly fixed incomes. Initially, inflation also affects the poor relying on government payments, because it takes about a year for increases in benefits to catch up to increases in prices. After that, though, a general inflation does not affect the poor much one way or another.

A general inflation also leads to a tax increase unless brackets remain pegged to some inflation measure, because of the increasing marginal tax rates.

I do agree with John M's "out of sight, out of mind" hypothesis. I think it was Mad Magazine several decades ago that produced a prototypical budget pie, with the portion dedicated to interest on national debt intentionally made unreadable. They explained that all competent budget pie diagrams do this to try to hide the extent to which the current budget pays for past borrowing.

Those who follow The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy series of books will recognize an SEP [someone else's problem] field at work. I believe the SEP field, as an invisibility tool, first appears in Life, The Universe, and Everything, but I won't have the books in front of me before this evening.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 21, 2015 - 01:48pm PT
Oh, hey. Here's a shocker. He's a 55 year old white Trump supporter.



Can someone please explain why white culture keeps churning out these hateful, violent people? Why can't Republicans speak out against Radical White Extremism? Stop the political correctness!
John M

climber
Dec 21, 2015 - 02:28pm PT
John E, I have seen different numbers for servicing the national debt. 7-10 percent of yearly budget just goes to paying interest. Imagine if we paid off the majority of the debt and then claimed a 5 percent across the board tax cut. 10 years to do it.

Thats the kind of thing I wish politicians were talking about.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 21, 2015 - 02:31pm PT

Can someone please explain why white culture keeps churning out these hateful, violent people? Why can't Republicans speak out against Radical White Extremism? Stop the political correctness!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 21, 2015 - 02:39pm PT
TGT- That's literally a Republican, Christian, multi-millionaire businessman.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 21, 2015 - 03:04pm PT
and why the concern about the national debt?

Both Republican controlled House and Senate just passed a one trillion dollar spending bill

Republicans have controlled the congressional spending arm, the House, since 2010

where is the wailing and wringing of hands and finger pointing at all this irresponsible
spending the Republicans have been doing?

where is the anguish, the rage, at the Republicans for running up the national debt?

yeah, they "own" spending and the debt

just like they "own" the collapse and recession of the US economy

tell me again, why do YOU vote Republican?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 21, 2015 - 04:10pm PT
Am I really the only one who can't get over how well TGT just set me up there? I mean damn.


Norton- In their defense, the Freedom Caucus is so vehemently anti-debt that they would happily just defund anything that isn't the military to eliminate the debt. It's a really stupid platform but it's fairly consistent. It's what has made it so hard for "regular order" to proceed until this current omnibus budget sailed through the House greased on the skids of tax cuts for all the right people with no payfors at all.
Jorroh

climber
Dec 21, 2015 - 04:38pm PT
Hi Craig
As usual the funding package was filled with all sorts of extra BS from the republicans.

A really bad example being that corporations now don't have to disclose or justify their political donations to their owners.

Essentially allowing corporate executives to indulge their political preferences at the expense of the owners of the company, without the owners having any say or, in practical terms, recourse.

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 21, 2015 - 05:01pm PT
.... And all it cost was two trillion dollars.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Dec 21, 2015 - 05:35pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 22, 2015 - 05:30am PT
Lorenzo posted
.... And all it cost was two trillion dollars.

I believe it added something like $700 billion to the deficit (almost entirely tax cuts).


Politifact was so overwhelmed with the sheer breadth and depth of lies that they couldn't pick one and decided to honor Trump's entire body of work with the "Lie of the Year" designation.

2015 Lie of the Year: the campaign misstatements of Donald Trump

Trump has "perfected the outrageous untruth as a campaign tool," said Michael LaBossiere, a philosophy professor at Florida A&M University who studies theories of knowledge. "He makes a clearly false or even absurdly false claim, which draws the attention of the media. He then rides that wave until it comes time to call up another one."

PolitiFact has been documenting Trump’s statements on our Truth-O-Meter, where we’ve rated 76 percent of them Mostly False, False or Pants on Fire, out of 77 statements checked. No other politician has as many statements rated so far down on the dial.

In considering our annual Lie of the Year, we found our only real contenders were Trump’s -- his various statements also led our Readers’ Poll. But it was hard to single one out from the others. So we have rolled them into one big trophy.

To the candidate who says he’s all about winning, PolitiFact designates the many campaign misstatements of Donald Trump as our 2015 Lie of the Year.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 22, 2015 - 06:09am PT
From January 2010

When the CBO issued its projections for Obama's budget in June 2009, it projected that the national debt would double to $11.7 trillion by 2019 if its pre-Obama baseline economic assumptions were held steady for 10 years. A more recent CBO baseline projection from this month puts the national debt at $14.3 trillion in 2019 and $15.0 trillion in 2020.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 22, 2015 - 06:19am PT
Ed, provide a link. Those numbers make no sense. The national debt in September of 2008 was already $10 trillion. How would it have "doubled" to reach $11 trillion in 9 years? If those other numbers are correct then they are projecting a budget surplus because the debt is currently $18 trillion.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 22, 2015 - 06:54am PT
John E was talking about inflation and the series of books from Douglas Adams.

“Since we decided a few weeks ago to adopt the leaf as legal tender, we have, of course, all become immensely rich. But we have also," continued the management consultant, "run into a small inflation problem on account of the high level of leaf availability, which means that, I gather, the current going rate has something like three deciduous forests buying a ship's peanut."

"So in order to obviate this problem," he continued, "and effectively revalue the leaf, we are about to embark on a massive defoliation campaign, and...er, burn down all the forests. I think you'll all agree that's a sensible move under the circumstances.”

 Douglas Adams,
The Hitchhikers Guide to The Galaxy
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 22, 2015 - 06:59am PT
I think the first part (doubled to 11.7 trillion) was a typo. The debt was 11.7 trillion at that time.

Here's a link. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/30/cnn-fact-check-is-the-annual-deficit-under-obama-12-times-the-deficit-under-republicans/

The 11.7 trillion number was compared to the national debt held by the public at the end of 2008, 5.8 trillion.

I highlighted the part I considered most relevant.
CBO baseline projection from this month puts the national debt at $14.3 trillion in 2019 and $15.0 trillion in 2020.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 22, 2015 - 12:01pm PT
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/22/africa/kenya-bus-attack-al-shabaab-muslim-christians/index.html


Muslims shield Christians when Al-Shabaab attacks bus in Kenya


In the Monday attack, the gunmen ordered Muslim passengers to come out of the bus and separate themselves from the Christians.

There were more than 100 passengers on board.

The Muslim passengers refused.

They gave the Christian women their hijabs and helped others hide behind bags in the bus, passenger Abdiqafar Teno told CNN.

"They told them, 'If you want to kill us, then kill us. There are no Christians here," he said.

A Christian man who tried to run away was captured and shot dead, Teno said. The driver of a truck, which was trailing the bus, was also killed.

The gunmen left, but warned they would return.

Nkaissery, the interior cabinet secretary, told reporters security forces were in "hot pursuit of the criminals."

Then he commended the actions of the Muslim passengers.

"We are all Kenyans, we are not separated by religion," he said. "We are one people as a nation. And this is a very good message from my brothers and sisters from the Muslim community."
dirtbag

climber
Dec 22, 2015 - 12:56pm PT
I watched the democratic debate last Saturday. It's too bad that they haven't been broadcasted when more people are available to watch them. It's refreshing to see adult conversations about serious issues, in contrast to the two-hour "bomb Agrabah" drivel the republicans spewed last Tuesday.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 22, 2015 - 01:14pm PT
dirt, if the GOP candidates started talking detailed policy like the Dem's their crowd would tune out and watch Dancing With the Stars or MMA.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 22, 2015 - 01:19pm PT
I watched the democratic debate last Saturday. It's too bad that they haven't been broadcasted when more people are available to watch them.

If you think that's accidental, I know of a bridge for sale. The last thing the frontrunner needs is people getting a chance to see more of her opponents.

The fatuous questions the Republicans get asked -- and the softballs pitched to Hillary Clinton -- did not happen accidentally, either. As long as they can distract the race with the realty TV personality, Hillary's Super PAC - aka the mainstream media -- believe they further her chances.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 22, 2015 - 01:34pm PT
Oh, brother. When Hillary's e-mail fake scandal was all the news, it led the news, day after day for months. She couldn't order a burrito bowl at Chipotle without being criticized. The media would still be hounding her if Trump hadn't come along saying something stupid every day. Another huge overreach, John.

Obviously, a frontrunner wants less debates. It's politics, there's no prize for 2nd place.

These are the primaries, there will be plenty later in the general election.

Softballs? Hardly.

RADDATZ: Secretary Clinton, in the wake of the San Bernardino attack, you all emphasized gun control. But our latest poll shows that more Americans believe arming people, not stricter gun laws, is the best defense against terrorism. Are they wrong?
CLINTON: Well, I think you have to look at both the terrorism challenge that we face abroad and certainly at home and the role that guns play in delivering the violence that stalks us. Clearly, we have to have a very specific set of actions to take. You know, when Senator Sanders talks about a coalition, I agree with him about that. We’ve got to build a coalition abroad. We also have to build a coalition at home. Abroad, we need a coalition that is going to take on ISIS. I know how hard that is. I know it isn’t something you just hope people will do and I’ve worked on that…
RADDATZ: Secretary Clinton, can we stick to gun control?
CLINTON: Yes, I’m getting…
RADDATZ: Are they wrong?
CLINTON: … I’m getting to that. Because I think if you only think about the coalition abroad you’re missing the main point, which is we need a coalition here at home. Guns, in and of themselves, in my opinion, will not make Americans safer. We lose 33,000 people a year already to gun violence, arming more people to do what I think is not the appropriate response to terrorism.
I think what is…
(APPLAUSE)
Is creating much deeper, closer relations and, yes, coalitions within our own country. The first line of defense against radicalization is in Muslim-American community. People who we should be welcoming and working with.
I worry greatly that the rhetoric coming from the Republicans, particularly Donald Trump, is sending a message to Muslims here in the United States and literally around the world that there is a “clash of civilizations,” that there is some kind of Western plot or even “war against Islam,” which then I believe fans the flames of radicalization.
So guns have to be looked at as its own problem, but we also have to figure out how we’re going to deal with the radicalization here in the United States.

RADDATZ: Secretary Clinton, you too have ruled out a large U.S. combat force, yet you support sending in special operations forces to Syria, and sending those 100 to 200 troops to Iraq to do exploitation kill raids.
We’ve already lost one Delta Force member in a raid. It has looked very much to me like we’re already in ground combat on frequent trips I’ve made there.
So, are you fooling Americans when you say, we’re not putting American combat troops back into Syria or Iraq?
CLINTON: No. Not at all. I think that what we’re facing with ISIS is especially complicated. It was a different situation in Afghanistan. We were attacked from Afghanistan. Al Qaida was based in Afghanistan. We went after those who had attacked us.
What’s happening in Syria and Iraq is that, because of the failures in the region, including the failure of the prior government in Baghdad, led by Maliki, there has been a resurgence of Sunni activities, as exemplified by ISIS. And we have to support Sunni-Arab and Kurdish forces against ISIS, because I believe it would be not only a strategic mistake for the United States to put ground combat troops in, as opposed to special operators, as opposed to trainers, because that is exactly what ISIS wants.

RADDATZ: Secretary Clinton, I want to circle back to something that your opponents here have brought up. Libya is falling apart. The country is a haven for ISIS and jihadists with an estimated 2,000 ISIS fighters there today. You advocated for that 2011 intervention and called it smart power at its best. And yet, even President Obama said the U.S. should have done more to fill the leadership vacuum left behind. How much responsibility do you bear for the chaos that followed elections?
CLINTON: Well, first, let’s remember why we became part of a coalition to stop Gadhafi from committing massacres against his people. The United States was asked to support the Europeans and the Arab partners that we had and we did a lot of due diligence about whether we should or not, and eventually, yes, I recommended and the president decided that we would support the action to protect civilians on the ground and that led to the overthrow of Gadhafi.
I think that what Libya then did by having a full free election, which elected moderates, was an indication of their crying need and desire to get on the right path. Now, the whole region has been rendered unstable, in part because of the aftermath of the Arab Spring, in part because of the very effective outreach and propagandizing that ISIS and other terrorist groups do.

RADDATZ: Let me ask you the question again. How much responsibility do you bear for the chaos that followed those elections?
CLINTON: Martha, we offered a lot more than they were willing to take. We offered a lot more. We also got rid of their chemical weapons, which was a big help, and we also went after a lot of the shoulder-fired missiles to round them up. You know, we can’t — if we’re not going to send American troops, which there was never any idea of doing that, then to try to send trainers, to try to send experts, is something we offered, Europeans offered, the U.N. offered, and there wasn’t a lot of responsiveness at first.
I think a lot of the Libyans who had been forced out of their country by Gadhafi who came back to try to be part of a new government, believed they knew what to do and it turned out that they were no match for some of the militaristic forces inside that country. But I’m not giving up on Libya and I don’t think anybody should. We’ve been at this a couple of years.
RADDATZ: But were mistakes made?
CLINTON: Well, there’s always a retrospective to say what mistakes were made. But I know that we offered a lot of help and I know it was difficult for the Libyans to accept help. What we could have done if they had said yes would have been a lot more than what we were able to have done.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 22, 2015 - 01:47pm PT
The "email fake scandal?" All the evidence educed so far shows it's real, but the mainstream media does its best to ignore that evidence. The more clear the evidence of illegal use of private servers for government work - and the consequent removal of public records from public scrutiny - the more silent the MSM becomes.

Had a Republican administration engaged in such pervasive illegality and cover-ups, it would have been hounded from office. During Watergate, Republicans in Congress joined Democrats in outrage over executive cover-ups. The sad fact is that in this administration, Democrats in Congress aid and abet those cover-ups. Hillary's and the Obama Administration's lesson from Watergate seems to be to destroy the tapes.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 22, 2015 - 01:52pm PT
I'll amend that to "over-hyped" scandal.

I completely disagree with your assessment that the media is ignoring this issue. They are hungry for any story, any scandal. I guess you weren't watching all summer and early fall when this led the news on every channel. Hillary has an uneasy relationship with the press, at best.

That "if the Republican's had done this" bs is Fox/Limbaugh/Hannity 101. Can't believe someone as smart as you falls for it.

evidence of illegal use
Hmmm..I guess indictments will be coming down any day, huh? Or is the FBI in on the cover-up, too?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 23, 2015 - 05:22am PT
John posted
The fatuous questions the Republicans get asked -- and the softballs pitched to Hillary Clinton -- did not happen accidentally, either.

John this kind of statement makes me question your news sources. When moderators tried to be as tough on Republican candidates as Cooper was on Clinton, the candidates all started mocking the moderators and refused to answer the questions. Did you actually watch the Democratic debates? I'm skeptical. I've watched every debate from both parties live except for this last Saturday. The idea that Dems are getting softballs compared to the Republicans is pure propaganda. In half the Republican debates they even have a card carrying partisan on the stage to frame questions tailor made for Republicans!

John posted
Had a Republican administration engaged in such pervasive illegality and cover-ups, it would have been hounded from office.

You mean like if the Vice President decided all his emails were exempt from archival rules? Or if the administration ignored incredibly clear warnings that a significant terrorist attack was imminent? Or if they contrived reasons to invade a country based on obviously bad information? Remind me which of those scandals resulted in people losing their jobs. My memory is obviously not as good as yours.
dirtbag

climber
Dec 23, 2015 - 05:51am PT
Once again, the republicans are serving chickenhawk at their presidential smorgasbord. All (except Paul) talk tough, tough, tough, but to my knowledge, none have served in the military. Graham and Perry did, but they are gawn.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 23, 2015 - 07:46am PT
where is the anguish, the rage, at the Republicans for running up the national debt?

And where is the rage at the Obama Administration's announcement that they have OK'd
the Air Forces's new Strategic Bomber Program? $200 BILLION for another worthless
POS white elephant toy for those sick bastards in the Pentagon? Really? How liberal!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 23, 2015 - 07:50am PT
It's persistent an ongoing, Reilly. If you really think that liberals are uniformly supportive of Obama then you really don't pay attention to liberals. This is the kind of distortion that takes places when you get sucked into binary politics and mediacentric worldviews.

Likewise, where is the praise for Obama from hawkish Republicans for his consistent support for these expensive toys? It goes against the desired narrative so Republicans instead indict him for "dismantling" the military.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 23, 2015 - 07:55am PT
Well, HD, I mainly wanted to see Norton and Crankloon's spin on why this is a laudable move
by the Obama Admin. I know they gotta appear to be strong on defense but I want to know
how this improves our national security, especially to the tune of $200 BILLION.
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:01am PT
Hillary is from the Southern Democrats. Think, repeal of Glass-Steigal. Think, tool of Wall Street. Not liberal at all. Neo-Liberal, just like Thatcher and Reagan. No thank you.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:21am PT
^^ I knew I could count on you to avoid a straight answer. Thanks! You do yer pres proud!
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:22am PT
You missed the answer, as usual. Sniff around to see what your Republican Congress thinks of the program. Then turm on any rightwing media source to hear them criticizing President Obama for "gutting the military".
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired Climber
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:28am PT


crankloon

Yuppie, white guy
No. Tahoe

Fixed it for you, crankloon
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 23, 2015 - 08:33am PT
Is there any good reason not to just give him a straight answer (other than it not being a straight question)? An actual discussion is a lot more fun than this passive aggressive sibling stuff.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:34am PT
10beornot10b, I'll be climbing and skiing Mt Rose Knob today...yuppie's ride lifts.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 23, 2015 - 08:40am PT
An actual discussion is a lot more fun than this passive aggressive sibling stuff.

Yes, it is. Yet most of the regulars seem to prefer the low road.

Lead by example.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 23, 2015 - 09:01am PT
Crankloon, yer reading comprehension is only dwarfed by yer integrity. I asked how $200 Billion
for a POS toy was going to improve our national security with the obvious corollary question
being how can an administration based on hope and change for the down-trodden
justify this? And just to give yer reading comprehension a leg up it isn't my Repub congress,
at least as far as I know. It's quite simple - they're in there because people didn't like the
alternative. Personally, I don't like any of 'em, much.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 23, 2015 - 09:06am PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 23, 2015 - 09:09am PT
This week in Islamophobia:

A Palestinian-American artist was detained and found to have sketches and writing in Arabic. Right wing media decided that he was an ISIL agent planning an attack.

An Arkansas family was booted from a shopping mall for looking Muslim. People then took to Facebook and posted pictures of them as terrorists and claimed they were "hollering al qaeda."

Someone spray painted "Jesus is the way" on a Mosque and then left a fake grenade in their driveway.

For no good reason other than American overreaction, a family of 11 was barred from boarding a plane in Britain to visit Disneyland.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Dec 23, 2015 - 07:05pm PT
F. G. Sanford
November 27, 2015 at 9:49 pm
Hey, does anybody remember when that little Caribbean nation got fed up with its corrupt leaders? They kicked out all the pimps, thugs, organized criminals, corrupt military officers, drug dealers, profiteers and crooked politicians. Then, USA recruited as many of them as they could to try to kick out the reformist government – even though it reduced illiteracy, poverty, unemployment, infant mortality, drug addiction, crime, improved public health and increased life expectancy! But then, there was blowback. That same gang of criminals and murderers who failed to kick out that new government were recruited by terrorists to assassinate a President. Today, their ideological descendants are even participating in the current Presidential elections! I like to think of them as “Sons of Anti-castro Cuban Kennedy Assassination Secret HIT Team”. I’ll leave it to the readership to come up with an appropriate acronym – there obviously is one. Come on, Doc, we’re dealing with a government based on political assassination which operates as the world’s largest criminal enterprise. It may be too late to indict G.H.W. Bush for the JFK hit, but not for the JFK Jr. Hit or the Florida Election scam or the Ohio Election Scam. There is not EVEN ONE honst branch left in our government. Sadly, I’m pretty sure collapse is the only cure, and it seems more likely every day.
couchmaster

climber
Dec 23, 2015 - 09:11pm PT

It's not crankloons fault he can't read. It's the teachers. (not) That's why when you say to him that he supports a lying, immoral, two faced woman with no integrity instead of an honest man who has integrity he calls you a Trump supporter. Hahaha! Maybe he hasn't heard of Bernie Sanders yet. Truly, ignorance running wild.

Tom Cochran, good point up there.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 23, 2015 - 09:21pm PT
Keep it up, Redneck. You'll be joining the Ron Anderson Hall of Shame any day.
I'll miss your thoughtful and in-depth political analysis, though.

See, you're just a slightly deranged, rightwing extremist who likely surround himself with like-minded fellers like yourself.
As you'll find out soon, my political views are shared by a majority of voters. Your's will be rejected, thankfully.

"Group watched this link"????? Oh, man. Group watched this link....wow.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Dec 27, 2015 - 09:58pm PT
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/white-house-correspondents-survey-117140

Very interesting article on the White House Press Corps.

You have to think these folks have somewhat better insight than most, as they see behind the curtain, to some degree.

63% think Clinton will be the next president.
21% think Bush
No one else over 4%

(although back in June)
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 28, 2015 - 06:33am PT
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 28, 2015 - 08:12am PT
63% think Clinton will be the next president.
21% think Bush
No one else over 4%

(although back in June)

they didn't expect TRUMP to last.. he still here.. polls show it
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 28, 2015 - 10:16am PT
You have to think these folks have somewhat better insight than most, as they see behind the curtain, to some degree.

63% think Clinton will be the next president.
21% think Bush
No one else over 4%


A bunch of insiders who can't see the forest cause of the trees.....


Today .... those loony pollsters at Rasmussen: "Clinton vs Trump: still a dead heat."

Only one poll will count ..... the "November General Election"





Norton

Social climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 10:24am PT
Only one poll will count ..... the "November General Election"

nope

the ONLY "poll" that counts is the Electoral College allocation, not the overall popular

you gotta get to 270 Electoral Votes to be President

the last two Presidential elections the Democrat got over 100 more than the Repub -modern day landslides

what do you think has changed to expect this time to be any different

interested to read your analysis
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 28, 2015 - 10:52am PT
Can you tell me who said this?

“I know sometimes I can remember from when I was in high school and college, some aspects of science or physics can be tough – chemistry. But this is not tough. This is simple. Kids at the earliest age can understand this.

Try and picture a very thin layer of gases – a quarter-inch, half an inch, somewhere in that vicinity – that’s how thick it is. It’s in our atmosphere. It’s way up there at the edge of the atmosphere. And for millions of years – literally millions of years – we know that layer has acted like a thermal blanket for the planet – trapping the sun’s heat and warming the surface of the Earth to the ideal, life-sustaining temperature. Average temperature of the Earth has been about 57 degrees Fahrenheit, which keeps life going.”

And Norton, the post said that poll that matters is the general election, not the popular vote. Since the general election determines the electors, I would say that "poll" matters rather a great deal.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Dec 28, 2015 - 10:57am PT
Kerry's not running, but every poll I've seen has Hillary Clinton winning the general election - and I doubt she'll need help from the Supreme Court.

I predict:
Hillary: 358
Whomever: 180
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Dec 28, 2015 - 11:02am PT
but every poll I've seen has Hillary Clinton winning the general election -

crankloon u gotta stop reading LIBERLAND magazine
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 28, 2015 - 11:36am PT
what do you think has changed to expect this time to be any different


Oh when Hillery is shown to be the lying, stealing, incompetent, cuckold, bought and paid for POS that she IS.

I don't know why you guys worship her. She is truly the bottom of the barrel of political types. She will change her beliefs as the need suites her owners/handlers.





Norton

Social climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 11:54am PT
I very much doubt anyone "worships" any political candidate

pointing out Hillary's strong lead in polling is hardly worship

should it be said that you worship the ultimate Republican nominee because you
will end up voting for them?

.....maybe you do worship, do you?
WBraun

climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 11:56am PT
What a brainwashed nut ^^^^

Strong lead in polling.

But just another useless stupid sterile puppet of the oligarchy.

Stoopid brainwashed politards can't think worth the sh!t ....
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 28, 2015 - 11:58am PT
I very much doubt anyone "worships" any political candidate

Really?

Seems like Clinton, Bush and Obama all had a fair number of worshippers.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:15pm PT
Seems like Clinton, Bush and Obama all had a fair number of worshippers.

really, if so I have not any worshippers

but I do know a lot of people who vote Republican who worshipped George Bush,
John McCain, Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney

and now Donald Trump is being worshipped, even by some posting on this thread

imagine all that worship

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
Norton, I guess you haven't met Monica Lewinsky.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:21pm PT
really, if so I have not any worshippers

For obvious reasons.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:26pm PT

And the 2015 LIE OF THE YEAR Award Goes to


Donald Trump!

Who lied so much, so often, that he got his own special award

http://www.politifact.com/california/article/2015/dec/21/2015-lie-year-campaign-misstatements-donald-trumpc/

because lying is SO important when deciding who to vote for or not
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:36pm PT
"Seems like Clinton, Bush and Obama all had a fair number of worshippers."

Oh ferchrissakes, Sketch. You can't be serious about such a statement.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:39pm PT
Holy shite!

Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:51pm PT
^^ WTF? A search for TGT gives no results.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:52pm PT
http://www.akdart.com/obama149.html

guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:57pm PT
.....maybe you do worship, do you?


Norton... your wrong again, as usual.

I do not worship any human being.

guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 28, 2015 - 12:58pm PT
So they toss out Wendel.... what over the line thing did he do?


Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 28, 2015 - 01:02pm PT
Guy, he probably deactivated himself. I can't think of anything TGT did that was that far over the line. He did contribute good climbing content.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 28, 2015 - 01:06pm PT
Gary,

I do not believe it is even possible to deactivate oneself

ChrisMac or RJ Spurrier can deactivate a poster
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 28, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
Gary ... he did contribute a bunch... I know the "pants down" deal caused some ruffled feathers.

Heck we are supposed to be climbers on this forum.

All real climbers I know have a "black humor" that will help you keep going when something terrible happens to a friend.

Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 28, 2015 - 01:13pm PT
Gary ... he did contribute a bunch... I know the "pants down" deal caused some ruffled feathers.

Heck we are supposed to be climbers on this forum.

All real climbers I know have a "black humor" that will help you keep going when something terrible happens to a friend.

I missed the "pants down" thread. As for gallows humor, all climbers need that, or we'd go nuts.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 28, 2015 - 01:18pm PT
So both of you missed his thread, and then happi's followup thread that got nuked?

They should have been self-explanatory as to why they 'ruffled feathers'.


I doubt he intended to offend with his thread title (others strongly believe otherwise), but he didn't do anything (that I noticed) to react to the shitstorm, either. Natural consequences, perhaps?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 28, 2015 - 02:00pm PT
TGT deactivated involuntarily? I saw the start of the thread, and was saddened to hear of the tragedy, but chose to ignore what I considered to be rather insensitivity in the thread name and post. I haven't been on this site for a few days, so I apparently missed all the drama it seemingly engendered. Someone must be getting awfully touchy if a mere thread name is enough to get the axe. I have never seen a post by TGT that came close to crossing the line.

John

Edit: A bit of internet archeology unearthed what formed the controversy, and has changed my opinion somewhat. I, too, find the thread in quite poor taste and understand why people reacted so strongly to it. I remember when "Anchors Away" (on the Glacier Point Apron) got its name, and I wasn't amused, since I knew the decedents whose fatal mistake gave rise to the name.

Why not just nuke the thread? The venom it engendered wasn't worth its presence here. I read a lot about free speech on ST and elsewhere, but an internet forum isn't a public area subject to the First Amendment. ST has a right to have whatever it wants on here. It shouldn't be, but the ability of allegedly mature posters here to give and take offense, rather than act like adults, still surprises and disappoints me.

monolith

climber
state of being
Dec 28, 2015 - 02:10pm PT
You seem to be jumping to the conclusion you most desire, John.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 28, 2015 - 02:15pm PT
Monolith, I'm reacting to what others said if by jumping to conlcusions, you mean concluding that the deactivation was involuntary. If your reaction comes from my post before I edited it, I can understand.

john
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 28, 2015 - 02:46pm PT
"Why not just nuke the thread?"

Excellent question. Best answered by TGT.

No doubt a timely nuking would have curbed most of the drama. After the first few critical replies, TGT modified his OP trying to clarify that he didn't intend the thread as a memorial, and that 'reaper lurks when least expected', and that bad stuff can happen in the mountains. All true, but still the tone of the thread title, and the OP commentary would be pretty offensive to anyone who knew or cared for Kei.

When the shitstorm started gathering, it would have been quite easy to simply nuke it. But some people seem to prefer to let anything they say or do stand on it's own, no matter how off-base it might be...or sometimes even double down on it. Hopefully they aren't too surprised by the blowback.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 28, 2015 - 03:37pm PT
All true, but still the tone of the thread title, and the OP commentary would be pretty offensive to anyone who knew or cared for Kei.

Oh, it was about that. A dear friend died in the Sierra under what we think were similar circumstances. Yeah, nothing funny about that.

Always stayed tied in.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 29, 2015 - 04:32am PT
zBrown

Ice climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 07:21am PT
Tamir can be seen on the surveillance tape playing with snowballs and pointing his gun at imaginary villains. Then Loehmann and his partner drive up. Because the gun appeared to be real, McGinty said, they were reasonably afraid for their lives — and legally justified in responding with deadly force.

Curious that no one else in the park, including the killer's partner was in sufficient fear for his/her life to shoot him.

Was it as bad as OJ? Likely not, but he and the other culprits are going to lose big time in the civil case.


dirtbag

climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 11:12am PT
Shocker: in 2008 Republican adds showing Obama darkened his skin.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/29/obamas-skin-looks-a-little-different-in-these-gop-campaign-ads/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_obamaskin_wb_120pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Dog whistle politics, anyone?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 29, 2015 - 11:13am PT
Hermit- is that an honest sentiment? I mean, other than not using the Republican politically correct term "Islamist extremism," what do you think he isn't paying attention to?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 29, 2015 - 11:51am PT
Some exchanges with friends on Facebook last night jogged my memory of what Douglas Adams wrote in The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe:

"The major problem -- one of the major problems, for there are several -- one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it, or rather who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary, anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem,."

The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe, Chapter 20, first two paragraphs.

Seems to describe the leading candidates of both parties all too well.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 29, 2015 - 11:57am PT
Clinton, Kasich and Bush all seem well suited to do the job. Don't confuse political propaganda with reasoned evaluation.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 29, 2015 - 12:04pm PT
John, that's why I propose to abolish elections and install a mandatory lottery system. Every citizen has to enter the lottery and everyone has to serve.

I think that's something Robert Heinlein came up with a long time ago. His proposition was that anyone who wanted to be president couldn't be trusted.

I'd make an exception for Sanders.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 29, 2015 - 12:19pm PT
Gary posted
I'd make an exception for Sanders.

Everyone makes an exception for their guy.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Dec 29, 2015 - 12:25pm PT
I feel he has a very credible record over the years.
MikeMc

Social climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 03:12pm PT
Quick and hopefully easy question from a guy who loathes political discussion for the most part.

I need a reputable, non biased (left or right leaning) source for info on our current presidential candidates. I want a one stop site that actually lists what their platforms are, without any political spin. Does such a thing exist, or is a unicorn? I honestly don't know of any such creature, but I do know that every site I have so far visited, turns out to be basically a propaganda site.

So politically minded ST people, where can a non political guy go to find info to make an informed choice.
Norton

Social climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 03:16pm PT
Mike,

check out this link, unbiased, can see what the candidates actually said on the issues

http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm

and here is another good one

http://www.politifact.com/
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 29, 2015 - 03:24pm PT
http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm

http://votesmart.org
Includes who funds them
MikeMc

Social climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 03:25pm PT
Thanks. Def better than Politico
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Dec 29, 2015 - 05:25pm PT
what do you think he isn't paying attention to?

Norton

Social climber
Dec 29, 2015 - 05:37pm PT
another 14 year old checks in
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Dec 29, 2015 - 05:50pm PT
here's another

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/


From it we learn that the department of defense and the food and drug administration are on Trump's list of top contributors.

Your tax dollars at work.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 06:14am PT
Hermit: So you actually think that ISIL is an existential threat to the United States? It's hard to know exactly what you're trying to convey when you communicate solely via political cartoons.


News Updates:

A grand jury decided not to indict the police officers who shot 12 year old Tamir Rice. He was peacefully playing with a toy gun when someone called the police reporting it but also stating that he believed it was a toy. That information was never relayed to police and they rolled up on the child and immediately shot him. If you haven't seen the video (click the link) it's pretty sickening.

A guy went into a convenience store and began harassing the Sikh clerk working there. When asked to leave he smashed a beer bottle on the clerk's head.

In case you are one of the few people who knew he was running, George Pataki suspended his presidential campaign today via web video. Presumably, this is Jim Gilmore's big chance to finally pick up some steam.

The US spying on Israel also scooped up communications from US congresspeople. (paywall)

Bill Cosby will (finally) be charged related to a 2004 sexual assault.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Dec 30, 2015 - 08:00am PT
Paranoid White Redneck Gun Toting Racist Inbred Trailer Trash Moron Deprogramming Seminars

If one or more of the following symptoms are troubling you, have you vexed, or have driven you to the boiling point then maybe you might be suffering from Paranoid White Redneck Gun Toting Racist Inbred Trailer Trash Moron Reactionary Syndrome;

1. Are you tired of having to go out and buy a new firearm and run up your credit card bill every time you hear about another terrorist attack or school shooting?

2. Do your involuntary racial slur's and narrowly avoided road rage altercations constantly plague you?

3. Are you addicted to spending every waking hour until the wee hours of the morning engaged in online chats arguing the merits of your fervent patriotic diatribe?

4. Do the long lost Mimaw or Uncle Leroy voices in your head almost have you convinced you that it's time to take some kind of drastic action?

If you have any or all of these symptoms and you're tired of the constant roller coaster ride and the downward spiraling internal dialogue of religious redneck retribution, maybe it's time stop, to take a deep breath, and consider listening to a voice of reason.

Sign up for our Paranoid White Redneck Gun Toting Racist Inbred Trailer Trash Moron Deprogramming Seminar today.*

You can rest assured that you will be permanently liberated from all that over the top fruit-loop, psycho, crazy thinking by our American citizen and veteran respecting, southern drawl appreciative, and fully accredited staff.

*Seminars and Deprogramming Workshops start at $35,000. Partial or full lobotomy fees are additional.

We are currently offering our Corporate/Government Conspiracy Deprograming and Alien Invasion/Faked NASA Mission Deprograming Seminars at a discounted rate.

Call 1-UNI-BOM-NOMO or
1-ALI-ENP-ROBE today for more information.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 08:02am PT
Is that copied from somewhere or did you come up with that? A great smile starter for the day.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Dec 30, 2015 - 08:03am PT
One of those couldn't help myself had to write it kind of things.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Dec 30, 2015 - 08:24am PT
Bushman,
That's pretty funny.

I liked this cartoon:
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 09:26am PT
Well done, Bushman!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 10:20am PT
It was confirmed by the WSJ that Netanyahu's speech before Congress was designed to be a big "f*#k you" to Obama.

Mr. Boehner (R., Ohio) and Mr. McConnell (R., Ky.) knew secrecy was key. If word leaked out, they believed the White House would pressure Mr. Netanyahu to decline. To ensure the invitation would come as a surprise, the leaders decided to tell only their closest aides.

“We knew this would be a poke in the eye,” a person close to the Republican leaders said of the invitation.

The immediate concern was whether Mr. Netanyahu would agree to accept the invitation. Mr. Netanyahu’s relationship with Mr. Obama was already deeply troubled. Initially, the two Republicans weren’t sure the prime minister would be eager to make that situation even worse by entering into a direct political fight with the president in Congress.

When Mr. Boehner called Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer on Jan. 9, the ambassador said he liked the idea and would sound out the prime minister, according to a person familiar with the call.

From the beginning, Mr. Boehner wasn’t entirely comfortable with what was a clear breach of protocol. Typically, only the White House would extend such an invitation in consultations with Congress. He and Mr. McConnell did not tell the White House about their discussions at any point during the planning, congressional officials said.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 30, 2015 - 10:35am PT
HDDJ...said
It was confirmed by the WSJ that Netanyahu's speech before Congress was designed to be a big "f*#k you" to Obama.


What you need the WSJ to let you know that?



apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Dec 30, 2015 - 10:37am PT
Of course not, guyman. But it's pretty noteworthy when Murdoch's tool becomes the voice of truth that everyone else knew was the case.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 30, 2015 - 10:47am PT
Of course not, guyman. But it's pretty noteworthy when Murdoch's tool becomes the voice of truth that everyone else knew was the case.

If you read the Wall Street Journal, you know it is no one's tool, and certainly not Murdoch's. It's editorial stance was always far to the right (or, in today's Republican party, seemingly, moderately centrist), but its news is among the most objective anywhere.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 10:52am PT
Before Murdoch took over that was generally the case. "Most objective anywhere" may not be fully accurate but it had a solid wall between the reporting and the editorial page. Part of editorial bias is choosing where to put your reporters and how loud to trumpet your reporting and I do not know how consistent the WSJ's current practice is with pre-Murdoch. Here's a great (if clumsy) example of how those kinds of biases work out behind the scenes:

I have watched in recent days as Mr. Schroeder has emerged as a spokesman for a billionaire with a penchant for politics who secretly purchased a Las Vegas newspaper and is already moving to gut it. I have learned with horror that my boss shoveled a story into my newspaper – a terrible, plagiarized piece of garbage about the court system – and then stuck his own fake byline on it. I admit I never saw the piece until recently, but when I did, I knew it had Mr. Schroeder’s fingerprints all over it. Yet when enterprising reporters asked my boss about it, he claimed to know nothing or told them he had no comment. Yesterday, they blew the lid off this idiocy completely, proving that Mr. Schroeder lied, that he submitted a plagiarized story, bypassed what editing exists and basically used the pages of my newspaper, secretly, to further the political agenda of his master out in Las Vegas. In sum, the owner of my paper is guilty of journalistic misconduct of epic proportions.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Dec 30, 2015 - 11:00am PT
HDDJ,

As a Journal reader for over 40 years, I see no change in the news other than format. For example, the "third from the right" column still exists daily, but it's not just one column, nor is it always third from the right. And the news summary isn't divided between "What's News" and "Who's News," but rather between business news and general news. Murdoch was smart enough to know who buys the Journal and why, and hasn't changed it the way we feared.

Even the content of the Opinion section is largely unchanged. I wasn't kidding when I described it as "moderately centrist," compared to how I would have described it in 1973, namely "way to the right." Sad to say, that isn't because it moderated its editorial policy, but because the Republican Party's self-styled conservatives are so far out there.

John
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Dec 30, 2015 - 11:13am PT
John.... well said.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 11:34am PT
Even the content of the Opinion section is largely unchanged. I wasn't kidding when I described it as "moderately centrist," compared to how I would have described it in 1973, namely "way to the right." Sad to say, that isn't because it moderated its editorial policy, but because the Republican Party's self-styled conservatives are so far out there.

Not hard to agree there.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Dec 30, 2015 - 05:32pm PT
Obama continued to ignore those who commit acts of terror today when the US military reportedly killed one of the ISIL leaders responsible for the attacks in Paris.

At least one militant linked to last month’s Paris terror attacks was among 10 Islamic State leaders killed in recent air strikes, the U.S. military said Tuesday.

U.S. Colonel Steve Warren, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition, said Charaffe al Mouadan was killed Dec. 24, and that he had a “direct link” to Abdelhamid Abaaoud, the ringleader of the Nov. 13 attacks that killed 130 people in Paris.

“Al Mouadan was actively planning additional attacks against the West,” Warren said in a video briefing from Baghdad.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 4, 2016 - 06:55am PT
It's January. SH#T IS REAL

Iowa Caucus: 29 days
New Hampshire Primary: 37 days

The NYT thinks we can expect candidates to start burning through their war chests, mostly on negative ads. Jeb Bush, it should be noted, still has tens of millions of dollars in SuperPac money and nothing to lose.

Mark Schmitt thinks Trump is a sign of the changes to our politics, not the change itself.

President Obama will hold a town hall hosted by Anderson Cooper on Thursday (January 7) on gun control. Presumably he will be making the public case for his executive action on gun regulation. The legal tests of this move have complicated repercussions.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 05:50am PT
The superintendent of one of the worst school districts in Missouri achieved 25 point increases in testing, 92% graduation rate and 100% college/employment placement rate after implementing "whole child" plan that attends to children's needs. They have a food pantry set up to feed hungry kids, they have a pediatrician who comes to the school because the nearest doctor is a significant distance away and they offer mental health counseling, case management and wellness education thanks to an in-house clinic opened in partnership with a university. She also has laundry facilities at the school that are free to use in exchange for 1 hour of volunteer work. PTA meeting attendance earns you free groceries.

Her newest project is the "Hope House" which is an abandoned school that was sitting empty. She turned it into a foster home that houses 8 kids and their foster parent.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 5, 2016 - 06:37am PT
Apparently, it does take a village.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 08:18am PT
HDDJ
That's a great story about the Missouri school district, TFPU.

To me it shows how a community can come together locally and lift itself up.
Not sure where all the funding came from, but some came from the town and local business's.
The participation of the parents would be the biggest part of most education solutions.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 08:27am PT
What people always forget is that, as my father likes to say, "you never don't pay." People are happy to pay for police in schools but a lot of the kids that act out in a manner requiring police are doing so because basic needs are not being met. It's hard to do homework if you're hungry. It's hard for a parent to care about the kid's schoolwork if they can't put food on the table. If your kid needs to go to the doctor but you don't have a car or can't get time off work without losing your job (or losing pay) then the rest of life doesn't go well either.
Norton

Social climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 08:39am PT

HighDesertDJ,

Thank you for starting this new comprehensive political thread.

Which is markedly different, much better, than all the previous ones.

This thread has a much different tone, of civility, of non contentiousness, of respect.

And it is because of you personally, the example you set reflecting the above.

Thank you
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 08:45am PT
Thanks, Norton. That was a very kind and generous thing to say.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 08:58am PT
^^^True.

But republicans still suck donkey schlongs.

;-)
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 09:18am PT
HDDJ
An aside on the homeless issue:
Several years ago my ex-wife was very involved with fundraising for homeless kids in San Diego.
I would go to events with her and meet some really neat people.
The kid's homeless shelter often would see a revolving door of the same kids coming, leaving for several days, then returning.
After several years of this we started to wonder if the facilities for food, beds, shelter, etc. didn't just enable many of these kids to re-charge themselves, then head back out to the excitement of street life without adult authority.

One day we were waiting in line to give a fundraising pitch and the folks ahead of us were a group of paraplegics whose physical therapy health care had run it's course. They had cobbled together a facility, surplus equipment and volunteer physical therapists, etc.
I listened to their pitch and noted that helping people is much easier when they want to help themselves.
Not saying the homeless stuff is not worthwhile, just observing the old adage of leading a horse to water.


Sounds like the folks in Missouri didn't want to just be shown (pun intended), they wanted to help lift themselves.

I also second what Norton said. (Can't believe I actually agreed with him...:-)


EDIT:
Dirtbag...your sounding like Trump with the schlong talk...;-)
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 09:42am PT
Larry posted
The kid's homeless shelter often would see a revolving door of the same kids coming, leaving for several days, then returning.
After several years of this we started to wonder if the facilities for food, beds, shelter, etc. didn't just enable many of these kids to re-charge themselves, then head back out to the excitement of street life without adult authority.

One day we were waiting in line to give a fundraising pitch and the folks ahead of us were a group of paraplegics whose physical therapy health care had run it's course. They had cobbled together a facility, surplus equipment and volunteer physical therapists, etc.
I listened to their pitch and noted that helping people is much easier when they want to help themselves.
Not saying the homeless stuff is not worthwhile, just observing the old adage of leading a horse to water.

You can lead a horse to water but it won't help if he's not thirsty. Or addicted to heroin. We like to blame people for their situations but fail to realize that people are not capable of having the same perspective that we might have or that our perspective might be wrong. There are piles of books about how aid to Africa has been poorly spent and the gobs of well intentioned volunteers building projects of little value to the people who they are designed to help. Kids who wind up on the street without an adult are generally going to have a long history of stress and challenge that will have shaped their worldview and decision making very differently than someone with a stable home. There are studies that showing even being situationally poor makes people worse at problem solving and math. My point is, the school system in that article was successful because started meeting their students where their problems were and then looked for the problem behind that problem and started working on that.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 09:53am PT
As someone with almost three decades of teaching experience, and the father (and father-in-law) of high school math teachers, I loved your post about the Missouri school district, HDDJ. We tend to overlook a fact my own experience always reinforces -- the most important determinant of success in school is what the student does away from school. Unfortunately, the larger the school district, the more difficult to put together a good "whole child" program.

Still, I think the experience of that district shows where government can help (i.e. providing necessary support for student) vs. where it helps less (e.g. imposing rigid standards, curricula and "best practices.")

I like what your father says about everyone paying. It's really a corolary of Friedman's Reiteration (viz. "Ain't no free lunch.")

John
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 09:57am PT
"You can lead a horse to water but it won't help if he's not thirsty. Or addicted to heroin. We like to blame people for their situations but fail to realize that people are not capable of having the same perspective that we might have or that our perspective might be wrong. There are piles of books about how aid to Africa has been poorly spent and the gobs of well intentioned volunteers building projects of little value to the people who they are designed to help."

This could apply equally well on the religious vs nonreligious threads. If there's no interest to modernize, it won't happen.

"Kids who wind up on the street without an adult are generally going to have a long history of stress and challenge that will have shaped their worldview and decision making very differently than someone with a stable home. There are studies that showing even being situationally poor makes people worse at problem solving and math."

Note the first principles here could apply equally well to poor cultures trying to make a livelihood out in the desert (or trying to keep up to the West). It ain't going to happen. Particularly as the oil dries up.

And when it's gone? there are going to be even more young restless males... measured in the tens of millions.

We're not ready.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 10:06am PT
John posted
Still, I think the experience of that district shows where government can help (i.e. providing necessary support for student) vs. where it helps less (e.g. imposing rigid standards, curricula and "best practices.")


I largely agree. It's tragic that so many have sought to stigmatize the kind of assistance that can help the most. When NCLB passed, many of the people who supported it were the same people demonizing welfare recipients. You can't expect someone to be held to more rigid standards and also have less support.


HFCS posted
Note the first principles here could apply equally well to poor cultures trying to make a livelihood out in the desert (or trying to keep up to the West). It ain't going to happen. Particularly as the oil dries up.

And when it's gone? there are going to be even more young restless males... measured in the tens of millions.

We're not ready.

I think we could say we are already experiencing that now. The RNC is very much becoming the party of the disaffected white voter. I think after this election it will either break apart or shift dramatically.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 10:57am PT
The RNC is very much becoming the party of the disaffected white voter.

One irony of the high Trump polling numbers remains one of the biggest components of his base of support -- disaffected white Democrats. If he gets the nomination, I think your observation would be well on its way to fulfillment, but I need to make a clarification. The RNC (i.e. the Republican National Committee) is so afraid of Trump becoming the nominee of the Republican Party precisely because the RNC, unlike the Trump supporters, is a much broader-based, centrist group. The self-styled guardians of conservatism spend at least as much vitriol on the RNC as they do on Democrats. How else could someone like Jeb Bush be considered a RINO?

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 11:13am PT
John posted
One irony of the high Trump polling numbers remains one of the biggest components of his base of support -- disaffected white Democrats.


You only told half the truth there. They are disaffected, southern, white Democrats who self-identify as Republicans. Think Kim Davis.


John posted
The self-styled guardians of conservatism spend at least as much vitriol on the RNC as they do on Democrats. How else could someone like Jeb Bush be considered a RINO?

Yeah, it's pretty nuts. Jeb seems like a smart, thoughtful guy but he makes Dubya look like a softie when it comes to ideology. I thought for sure Jeb would wind up in Romney's position in this race and, contrary to most, I still think he has a chance to bounce back in this next month. Even then, New Hampshire is so close between so many of the candidates that it may not really decide anything other than who is out of cash. If Bush can ride his money train until a few other guys drop out and the more centrist (*cough*) voters can rally around him he might had a real go. A few screw ups from Rubio wouldn't hurt.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 5, 2016 - 11:29am PT
Mr. Trump’s best state is West Virginia, followed by New York. Eight of Mr. Trump’s 10 best congressional districts are in New York, including several on Long Island.

Southerners, indeed.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 11:33am PT
Ed: Those are mostly Republicans. The southerners we were talking about were the Democrats.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 11:43am PT
How else could someone like Jeb Bush be considered a RINO?


John... basically he is a RINO, wants to get his bros old crew together, to carry on with all the stupid stuff his bro and dad did. You know, spend 5x more $$$$$ on the stuff that helps rich ass stockbrokers and other Wall Street types. They are to scared to work on and Fix the Border/immigration mess/work on a healthcare system/come up with a realistic plan to deal with the Mid-east and other problem spots.

All that would be work, hard work, because you need to get down with the democrats and work things out.

Those establishment types only care about one thing: staying in power (even if minority party only power) so they can funnel the $$$$$ to their friends (financial backers really)and keep things as they are now (basically FUBAR) so yes JEB! is a RINO, so is Christie, Rubio, and almost all standing on the stage.

Donald Trump scares the heck out of them, he took the pledge, they agreed to play fair and now we just need to wait and see what the next few voting primaries look like.

I do know one thing... by by JEB!

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 11:44am PT
guyman posted
John... basically he is a RINO, wants to get his bros old crew together, to carry on with all the stupid stuff his bro and dad did. You know, spend 5x more $$$$$ on the stuff that helps rich ass stockbrokers and other Wall Street types.

So you mean that he's a Republican in substance? Are you unclear on what RINO means or something?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:07pm PT
Are you unclear on what RINO means or something?


HDDJ... Please don't act stupid. I hope I do not treat you like your stupid.

He is the dictionary definition of what Republican In Name Only ... IS.





dirtbag

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:13pm PT
Actually, what hddj excerpted from your post has been basic republican trickle down/supply-side economic policy since at least Reagan. I.e., quintessential republicanism.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 12:14pm PT
guyman posted
He is the dictionary definition of what Republican In Name Only ... IS.

But can you articulate what that is? Without the circular logic. Because I don't think it's clear what you are actually trying to say. It certainly isn't clear to me.

HDDJ... Please don't act stupid. I hope I do not treat you like your stupid.

you're*
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:16pm PT
Thank you, Mr. President...

President Obama delivered a deeply personal and emotional appeal to the country to help curb gun violence on Tuesday at the White House. For Obama, who is often criticized for his overly clinical approach to heated issues, his tone -- sad and mad in relatively equal measure -- was remarkable. Toward the end of his remarks, remembering the first graders who were the victims of a mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, Obama even wept briefly -- a remarkable concession to emotion from this president. The speech was memorable one for reasons beyond Obama's emotion. I annotated it using Genius; sign up and join me. I'd love your thoughts on the address. It begins with Obama thanking Mark Barden, the father of one of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, who introduced him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/05/president-obamas-amazingly-emotional-speech-on-gun-control-annotated/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_transcript-230pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
dirtbag

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:31pm PT
Next up: FEMA camps.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:35pm PT
The hoopla over this mystefies me. If the President has this authority, why does no one criticize him for failing to use it for six years? If this is such a big deal, he should have exercised that authority, at the very latest, after the Gabby Giffords shooting. Instead, after each shooting that the press and administration played up, all he did was castigate those who opposed his views, then sit on his hands.

The sycophantic press he receives disgraces the profession of journalism.

John
dirtbag

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:40pm PT
He wasted time by making the mistake of trying to work with a right wing congress to enact legislation, which would have been far preferable.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:42pm PT
He wasted time by making the mistake of trying to work with a right wing congress to enact legislation, which would have been far preferable.

I know that's the standard reply of his supporters, but if he has this power constitutionally, then we aren't in an either/or situation. His speech seems to recognize that, because he says this action doesn't obviate the need for legislation. The grandstanding shines brightly; the substance less so.

john
John M

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:52pm PT
He has the power. Its been abused. Dems don't want it abused. That is why he has been slow to use it. Thats a good thing in my opinion. First try to get it done through the legislature.

Even though I agree with what he is trying to accomplish, I'm not sure that I agree that he should have used this power for this. It bothers me.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 5, 2016 - 12:56pm PT
John E. , "grandstanding"??? Your cynicism has reached a new low.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 01:53pm PT
Actually, what hddj excerpted from your post has been basic republican trickle down/supply-side economic policy since at least Reagan. I.e., quintessential republicanism.


Boy oh boy you sure read a lot into what I wrote.

Did Bill Clinton end this supply-side economic policy?

Did the shrub end this supply-side deal?

Has President Obama ended this supply-side stuff?

Ksolem

Trad climber
Monrovia, California
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:28pm PT
The speech was 100% political posturing. He wants the Republicans to respond stupidly, and they are already obliging him.

There's really nothing controversial in there except for having fingerprint safeties on guns, and that's a "proposal," not in the order.

Of course there's more in the order than was in the speech and we'll see all of that dribble out over the next few daze. Expect a "No Fly List" rule - the equivalent of being found guilty of a crime you were never charged with. And word is they will be mining the Social Security database for people who "cannot handle their finances," are itinerant, live in certain areas and such things. Welcome to the brave new world.

And man, those crocodile tears. Give him an Oscar.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:35pm PT
That Californian republicans realize Cruz is far more likely (although still an underdog) to win the general election than Trump is?
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:37pm PT
Trump being so extreme has made Cruz seem reasonable. Quite the accomplishment. Without Trump, Cruz is the mad, far-right candidate.
Oh well. I think the democrats have better odds against Cruz than they would against Rubio.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:53pm PT
And man, those crocodile tears. Give him an Oscar.
Apparently, when you sign the anti-Obama pledge you leave your soul as a deposit.


CA? Not in play for the GOP.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:54pm PT
Cruz and Rubio had better come up with some magic soon, or who would beat the Dems is a moot point.

They both have lost the far right to the Donald.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 02:59pm PT
Apparently, when you sign the anti-Obama pledge you leave your soul as a deposit.

It would appear to be the case if you support him, too. The news conference was pure political theatre, and, as Kris said, the regulations were relatively (at least to me) non-controversial. Again, if this is such world-shattering news, why wait six years? Do your job, enact the regulations the law allows, and actually try working with your opposition, rather than villifying them.

John
Norton

Social climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 03:03pm PT
August West said

That Californian republicans realize Cruz is far more likely (although still an underdog) to win the general election than Trump is?

interesting comment, August

as the rest of the country's Republicans clearly seem to feel that actually picking who is to be their nominee has nothing to do with winning the general elections

they overwhelmingly choose Donald Trump, knowing that he has alienated just about
every demographic other than white males with what he says every day

political experience also appears to mean absolutely nothing to them

could it be that the old cliche of As California Goes So goes the Country - eventually?

regardless, both Trump and Cruz stand very little chance of getting to 270 Electoral Votes
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 03:07pm PT
Interesting comment, Norton. Starting in 1968, when the California Republicans nominaated Max Rafferty rather than incumbent Thomas Kuchel, we have had a fatal attraction to that famous statement of Henry Clay: "I'd rather be right than President" (or in Rafferty's case, Senator . . .)

It would be a wonderful change to see centrist pragmatism replace our seeming insistence on ideological purity, without regard for electability.

John
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 03:24pm PT
They both have lost the far right to the Donald.


Not so sure about that, all the talk radio dudes, are all bent cause TRUMP is not on the right.

And he is not.

Norton

Social climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 03:42pm PT
TRUMP is not on the right.

And he is not.

very true, guyman

Trump himself said at the first debate that yes he was a Democrat for many years
and defended being one because most everyone in NY State was, so why not?

not very "right" or pure, or consistent is he?

through the years he has changed his positions on the issues

yet he remains, by far, the front runner

so why is that the Republican base disregards all that and wants him anyway?
Skeptimistic

Mountain climber
La Mancha
Jan 5, 2016 - 03:43pm PT
And man, those crocodile tears. Give him an Oscar.

Wow. If the thought of the horror those kids faced and the immeasurable sorrow their families feel every day since then doesn't make your heart ache, you need a trip to see the wizard.

What a heartless ass.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 5, 2016 - 04:06pm PT
It doesn't matter if Trump is on the right. He knows how to push the buttons of the far right better than any tea party dude.

He can do it from the left seat.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 5, 2016 - 04:22pm PT
The President took executive action because the do-nothing Republican-controlled Congress would not. The GOP is essentially a legislative arm of the gun lobby.

It was not political "theater", it was smart politics having the victims of senseless gun violence in attendance. They are the ones leading the effort for sensible gun reform like the President offered today.

working with your opposition

I'll say this as politely as I can, but you can't be serious. ANY compromise with the President by a moderate Republican is immediately met by attack ads and a drafting of a tea party candidate to take out the "traitor" and replace him with a "patriot".

A day of reckoning is coming, in my view. Sensible Americans will reject the politics of fear, hate and paranoia offered by the nightmare GOP candidates. They are going down big.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 04:58pm PT
so why is that the Republican base disregards all that and wants him anyway?

Norton... I think that the "BASE" of the GOP wants something different than what the LEADERS wish for.

Just to add.... I don't know who this BASE is anyway. The people who demand a religious candidate, are they the base?

The people who demand a hard law n order type, are they the base?

The people who demand big pay outs to WS and other business types, the base?

who knows? and that is why this election is so much fun, IMHO.


and Obama and his gun laws..... he is only hurting law abiding citizens with his endless drivel. If I was a Democrat and I believed in hard ass, strict, gun control.... I would be mad as hell at this man who has basically done nothing to advance my cause. Its time for Democrats to wake up and smell the coffee.
Jorroh

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:19pm PT
"so why is that the Republican base disregards all that and wants him anyway?"

Very good article explaining just that.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:21pm PT
The President took executive action because the do-nothing Republican-controlled Congress would not.

If the actions were his to take, why wait six years?

And Obama has compromised with Republicans when he actually wants to get something done, rather than score political points. He's much more interested in the latter than the former, which is why he's on an insult fest. Sad to say, and again as Kris rightly points out, the Republicans just take his bait.

John
zBrown

Ice climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:25pm PT
So I guess you're saying that Reps were willing to compromise on this issue?


guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:26pm PT
That is a good read, I think El Cap posted that a few days ago.

Frum is pretty smart person, IMHO.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:27pm PT
So I guess you're saying that Reps were willing to compromise on this issue?

What would you propose?

John
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:31pm PT
Why wait six years?

Because he took your advice, John, and tried to work something out with the GOP.

As you noted, the things he has done are not particularly radical, but you will note that the GOP is coming out swinging as hard as they can.......and saying that if a Repug is elected, they will rescind the first day.

Note that they will use EXACTLY the same authority to rescind as enact, so they are NOT above using the same presidential power.

And Max Rafferty! The guy who moved from Ca to Misssissippi, and was said to have raised the IQ of BOTH states!

The news conference was pure political theatre, and, as Kris said, the regulations were relatively (at least to me) non-controversial. Again, if this is such world-shattering news, why wait six years? Do your job, enact the regulations the law allows, and actually try working with your opposition, rather than villifying them.
Jorroh

climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:36pm PT
Really Trump has done one hugely positive thing, and that is expose the Republican Party as the fraud that it is.
Going forward, its hard to imagine that the gumby wing of the party, even as blinded as they are by hate, anger and resentment, will ever be so easy to dupe again.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:39pm PT
How so, Anders? Doesn't that make me the opposite of 666, at least in a sense?

Congrats on No. 1000, by the way.

John
zBrown

Ice climber
Jan 5, 2016 - 05:44pm PT
I would propose that the possibility of the Reps compromising on the issue were, and still are, extremely remote.

To be fair it's not just the Rep part of congress.

We could ask for some help here.

Human Computation May Be Key to Solving World's Wicked Problems


Researchers from Cornell University and the Human Computation Institute want more humans to help out in accelerating research and finding solutions to life's most difficult problems, such as cancer, HIV, climate change and drought and gun control.

I'll leave the rest to my associate, Herr Braun.


HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 5, 2016 - 06:04pm PT
John posted
The hoopla over this mystefies me. If the President has this authority, why does no one criticize him for failing to use it for six years? If this is such a big deal, he should have exercised that authority, at the very latest, after the Gabby Giffords shooting. Instead, after each shooting that the press and administration played up, all he did was castigate those who opposed his views, then sit on his hands.

You're right. Obama is an idiot for trying to pass laws through a legislative body in a representative democracy.

As a more straightforward answer to your intentionally obtuse and specious question, the stuff he's doing is peanuts compared to what actually needs to get done and that stuff requires congressional action. People are overselling it and are just happy to see something change. The anti-Obama side is obviously overselling it too, claiming that this is the beginning of the end for "are freedoms."

What is actually exciting is that he is helping law the political groundwork for gun control to no longer be a losing issue. By encouraging people to have expectations for action, legislators can feel safer to incorporate a plank into their platform.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 5, 2016 - 06:20pm PT
Trump went birther on Ted Cruz Monday.

In an interview with MyFoxNY following Cruz’s big 2016 announcement Monday morning, Trump raised the issues surrounding the Canadian-born Cruz’s citizenship, suggesting it might be a hurdle in reaching the Republican nomination for president.

“Well he’s got, you know, a hurdle that nobody else seems to have at this moment,” Trump said by phone. “It’s a hurdle and somebody could certainly look at it very seriously.” Noting that Cruz was born in Canada, Trump said, “you’re supposed to be born in this country, so I just don’t know how the courts would rule on it. But it’s an additional hurdle that he has that no one else seems to have.”

In August 2013, Cruz released his birth certificate in an attempt to quell any rumblings about his eligibility to run for president. While he was born in Alberta, Canada, his mother was a U.S. citizen, which means he got automatic citizenship as well.

It was around that same time that Trump first expressed his skepticism over Cruz’s citizenship in an interview with ABC News’ Jonathan Karl. “If he was born in Canada, then perhaps not,” Trump said of Cruz’s eligibility. “That will be ironed out. I don’t know the circumstances. If he says he was born in Canada, that’s his thing.”

Next he will claim the birth certificate is fake.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 6, 2016 - 12:14am PT
My Prescription for 2016: Collapse Early and Often

By Dmitry Orlov

January 05, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - We are in the time of year when most sensible animals living in northerly climates are hibernating in burrows and hollow tree trunks, while the somewhat less sensible pundits make their predictions for the coming year. My prediction is always the same—things will go on more or less same as before, until something major breaks, while the probability of something major breaking goes up with each passing year. I have called this event “collapse,” and have predicted, year after year, that it will eventually happen. And so, instead of repeating this less than useful prediction, this year I will instead provide a prescription.

Not too many people, I expect, will want to follow my prescription; not too many of my family members, or friends, or acquaintances, or you who are reading this. And that's fine because, as I have learned over and over again, there is no strength in numbers. Quite the opposite: the probability of any given trick working is in inverse proportion to the number of times it is tried, or the number of people who try it. And so, if you are reading along and think “I can't possibly do this because of [insert lame excuse]!” then—good! Fine with me. Fewer people equals more oxygen.

And that applies to the few people who will actually bother to read this. Lots more people will not want to read this, because—what collapse? Gasoline prices are low, Obama has shut down most of the wars, the economy is strong enough for the Fed to have started hiking rates, and once Bernie Trump gets into the White House, everything else will be set right too. To the people who think that, someone like me, who predicted collapse a while back, was clearly wrong, and needs to be psychoanalyzed, not followed. Again, fine with me, so long and thanks for all the bullsh#t.

The reasons it's all bullshit are as follows.

• Gasoline prices are low because high oil prices crashed the economy. In turn, low oil prices are destroying the North American oil patch, which was only showing new signs of life thanks to fracking and tar sands, which are expensive to produce and only make sense when oil prices are high. Rest assured, prices will go back up, and then back down, until, in the end, oil comes to be regarded as useless toxic waste. A year ago I described exactly this scenario.

• The wars are over because all of them pretty much ended in defeat for the US. None of them achieved any of their stated objectives. Now, some of you will jump up and try to comment that the stated objectives were not the real objectives, which were to sow chaos and destruction for the sheer hell of it while enriching defense contractors. That's fine too, because such “real” objectives are consistent with imperial collapse: empire wants to steal a precious vase; empire smashes it instead; success! Moreover, whatever the objectives, they don't matter any more, because now they can't be achieved no matter what. The new Russian/Chinese/Indian/Syrian ordnance, such as the S-300/400/500 air and space defense systems, the Kalibr long-range supersonic cruise missile, along with various electronic warfare systems such as Khibiny, has rendered most US forces obsolete. You can say that defeat is victory but, as I explained two years ago, it isn't. Cancel Red Alert and set course for nearest dry dock.

• The Fed is pretending to hike rates to avoid the impression that it has lost control. This is not the only sort of pretense being attempted in the financial arena; there are plenty of others. The US economy isn't growing, and if you subtract out the effect of runaway debt (which will never be repaid no matter what scenario you consider as likely) then it's actually shrinking. More accurately, it can be said that it is sucking in whatever it can in order to avoid collapsing. It is a black hole, as I described half a year ago.

• As far as the “Bernie Trump will save us” theme, it is well understood by now that the US is no longer a democracy. (Maybe it was one once upon a time, maybe not; it doesn't matter.) Consider the matter settled. Anyone who thinks that it is still possible to effect positive change in the US by voting is a conspiracy theorist of the most miserable, deluded kind.


* * *

There are some general properties of collapses to keep in mind.

1. All things that must collapse eventually do. All empires collapse—no exceptions. All buildings collapse—unless they are demolished first. All Ponzi schemes—such as the current financial system, based on runaway debt—collapse when you least expect them to. Seeing as collapses aren't optional, it makes sense to get used to the idea of them happening, and to learn how make the best of them. Some people consider this and are filled with grief. As I pointed out before, collapse is the worst possible time to suffer a nervous breakdown, so please get your blubbering over with ahead of time.

2. Some collapses are actually good for you. Some really important things could be saved provided whatever less important thing that would cause them to collapse collapses first. For instance, if indistrial civilization were to collapse soonish, this would avoid ecosystem collapse, leaving whatever survivors would be left with breathable air and a survivable climate. And if the gigantic bubble in human population, which grew apace with the burning of fossil fuels, were to pop before turning the planet into a giant smoldering trash heap, then the few survivors would have a reasonable chance of making it.

3. Bigger collapses are nastier than smaller ones. For example, if you had lots of local banks and credit unions making loans to people who then couldn't repay them, then some large number of these banks and credit unions would collapse, insured depositors would be repaid, bad debts would be written off, and the entire system would eventually recover. But if you have a handful of gigantic banks and financial institutions holding most of the bad debts, and they fail all at once, then that brings down the entire system. And if you bail them out, then the entire system ends up on life support for the rest of its life, because nobody has any incentive to stop generating bad loans, since now everyone expects to be bailed out again and again.

4. Frequent collapses are better than infrequent ones. This is because unless things—be they populations, Ponzi schemes, economies, cities or empires—collapse on a regular basis, they tend to get too big. And when they get too big, their collapse (which is inevitable, see Point 1 above) becomes bigger, making them worse (see Point 3 above). Plus, frequent collapses of the nonfatal kind can be actually good for you (see Point 2).

For example:

• If the electric grid collapses now and again, then you will eventually learn that you need to get yourself a 12V system, a generator, some solar panels, a wind generator, and install LED lights.
• If water pressure goes down to zero periodically, then you will learn that you need to put in some cisterns, a filtration system, a demand pump, and collect water off the rooftop.
• If garbage collection stops for periods of time, then you will learn to incinerate and to compost, and will try to minimize the amount of nonbiodegradable trash you generate.
• If paid work disappears for periods of time, then you will learn that you need to keep a few months' worth of savings around to ride out these periods.
• If stores run out of food on a semi-regular basis, then you will learn that you need to grow your own food, put a chicken coop in the back yard and figure out how many lazy beds of potatoes you need.
• If banks periodically confiscate all your money (that's called a “bail-in,” and it's actually been made legal not too long ago), then you will learn to keep an absolute minimum of money in the banks, and figure out other, more reliable forms in which to store your savings.
• If you were to periodically find yourself cut off from the medical system, then you would find out ways of staying healthy and of treating yourself.
• If you periodically found it impossible to buy gasoline, you would learn that you can't rely on your car, and would instead bicycle, or walk, or take public transportation.
• If your country's government periodically turned fascist and started detaining, torturing and killing people indiscriminately, then you'd learn that you need to get yourself a second passport, and practice getting out of the country in a hurry.

These are all examples of small, frequent collapses that are good for you.

But that's not what everyone seems to be aiming for, now, is it? What everyone seems to be aiming for is preventing any and all of these small, frequent, nonfatal collapses. However, such efforts are in direct contradiction with Point 1: “All things that must collapse eventually do.” Instead of preventing collapse, such tactics guarantee a single, huge, catastrophic collapse that can very well turn out to be fatal for huge masses of people. But that's OK: see Point 2: if “the gigantic bubble in human population... pops before turning the planet into a giant smoldering trash heap, then the few survivors will have a reasonable chance of making it.”

And so, what if you aspire to being one of these few survivors who might stand a reasonable chance of making it? My prescription is simple: Collapse Early and Often.

Dmitry Orlov is a Russian-American engineer and a writer on subjects related to "potential economic, ecological and political decline and collapse in the United States," something he has called “permanent crisis”. http://cluborlov.blogspot.com
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 6, 2016 - 12:19am PT
Jeb Bush apologizes for saying he won an NRA award that doesn’t exist
The former Florida governor repeatedly suggested he was named the group’s Statesman of the Year, but he instead received a rifle for being a keynote speaker at a convention.



Uh-oh!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 6, 2016 - 06:25am PT
Like most things, people root for their team. I'd rather President Obama not be using so many executive orders, but I generally support what they do and they are in the face of an intransigent congress that has made it's top priority the blind opposition to nearly anything Obama supports.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Jan 6, 2016 - 07:07am PT
Please go easy on the few who reflexively object to such moderate and publicly supported gun purchase restrictions.

Its a matter of synaptic mutation and is predictable, social diversity- replicating biological oddities, such as 3 legged frogs.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 07:55am PT
Tom, that's an excellent piece. Grade A.

Besides "collapse" another useful term along the same (economic ecological) lines is "boom and bust cycle" or "cycling" of which collapse would be a part.

So is coming to terms (psychologically) with collapse - or boom and bust cycling - as a more or less regular part of nature and natural processes and the big picture a good thing? I don't know.

Perhaps it could incline someone at some point to care a little less about something, like pushing a red button in the face of an over-populated somewhere?

Anyways, interesting and thought-provoking piece.

Nature's a tough mistress.


Or...

The sky is falling, Watch out!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 08:38am PT
Tom, along similar lines...

Collapse now and avoid the rush...

"The skills, resources, and lifeways needed to get by in a disintegrating industrial society are radically different from those that made for a successful and comfortable life in the prosperous world of the recent past..."

http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2012/06/collapse-now-and-avoid-rush.html

"Each new round of crisis will push more people further down the slope; minor and localized crises will affect a relatively smaller number of people, while major crises affecting whole nations will affect a much larger number."
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 6, 2016 - 08:59am PT
A review by USA Today shows that the president has issued 198 "presidential memoranda," more than any U.S. president in history.

Presidential memoranda are quite similar to executive orders — in fact, they're almost identical in that they both allow a president to manage and govern the actions of the departments and agencies under the executive branch of government. The convenient difference? Obama can avoid being accused of overusing executive orders if he technically issues a memorandum.

The president has issued 195 executive orders from his White House, and the review reveals that when the memos and executive orders are combined, "Obama is on pace to issue more 'high-level executive actions' than any president since Harry Truman." Teresa Mull
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 04:05pm PT
TomCochrane
Really good article on the collapse. TFPU.

So with the economy an issue in the election, Michael Burry thinks another crises is coming.
Short but good interview with Michael Burry, who Christian Bale plays in the movie "The Big Short".

This answer is a good perspective on the 2008 financial crises:

The postcrisis perception, at least in the media, appears to be one of Americans being held down by Wall Street, by big companies in the private sector, and by the wealthy. Capitalism is on trial. I see it a little differently. If a lender offers me free money, I do not have to take it. And if I take it, I better understand all the terms, because there is no such thing as free money. That is just basic personal responsibility and common sense. The enablers for this crisis were varied, and it starts not with the bank but with decisions by individuals to borrow to finance a better life, and that is one very loaded decision. This crisis was such a bona fide 100-year flood that the entire world is still trying to dig out of the mud seven years later. Yet so few took responsibility for having any part in it, and the reason is simple: All these people found others to blame, and to that extent, an unhelpful narrative was created. Whether it’s the one percent or hedge funds or Wall Street, I do not think society is well served by failing to encourage every last American to look within. This crisis truly took a village, and most of the villagers themselves are not without some personal responsibility for the circumstances in which they found themselves. We should be teaching our kids to be better citizens through personal responsibility, not by the example of blame.

Michael Burry

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/12/big-short-genius-says-another-crisis-is-coming.html
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 6, 2016 - 05:05pm PT
Bagging on President Obama for the use of Exec Orders after President Bush?

Laughable!

GWB = 291 Exec orders
BHO = 227 Exec Orders

DMT

The issue isn't the number of executive orders; it's their content. In my opinion, this executive order is proper, although there can be some reason for questioning. In contrast, executive orders countermanding legislation (e.g. refusing to enforce immigration laws) threaten the balance of power between branches of government. No one accused Bush of doing any such thing. Obama has done so early and often.

John
Jorroh

climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 05:54pm PT
"This crisis truly took a village, and most of the villagers themselves are not without some personal responsibility"

A bit intellectually dishonest in the sense that of all the people involved in the chain of transactions that starts with deciding to buy a house and ends with a synthetic CDO being sold to some dupes managing a retirement fund for teachers in Dusseldorf, the "villager' is not a professional (The only one who isn't) and is, by far, the least sophisticated player.
These "villagers" almost always paying for advice, indirectly and directly, from other players in that chain (like a Realtor or a mortgage broker for example).
Some responsibility...absolutely, but the level of responsibility rises exponentially as you go up that transaction chain.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 6, 2016 - 06:18pm PT
Jorroh,
Excellent point.
I think Burry is implying that even the smallest players in the game wanted something for nothing.

"Hey, I can't afford this home, but with a subprime interest only payment that would cost less than a rental house, I can get $100,000 equity in this crazy market before the balloon payment and sell.
Something for nothing.
And if ya wanna go for it, go.

And for the average individual, buying a home is the biggest financial decision they will make. Ya wanna educate yourself on it goin in.

But you are right that we hire professionals to guide us through the myriad of legal procedures.
And the professionals right up to the top wanted something for nothing...just a bigger scale of the same and as you correctly note, exponentially more responsibility.

Wall St sharks got off the hook for their ethical breaches...well, Washington DC let them off the hook.
Not so strange bedfellows...the mother's milk of politics...crony capitalism.
All on the backs of the middle class worker.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 6, 2016 - 06:22pm PT
The only action the Republican congress takes are meaningless acts like defunding Planned Parenthood and repealing
Obamacare (for the 345th time). They are incapable of governing.

Given their political sterility, executive action is the logical, and proper, recourse.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 6, 2016 - 07:13pm PT
S(pud), doesn't matter all that much. Idaho and California aren't in the mix, red & blue, and all.
So, best to just go ski and let it play out.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 06:20am PT
John posted
In contrast, executive orders countermanding legislation (e.g. refusing to enforce immigration laws) threaten the balance of power between branches of government.

You're oversimplifying and ignoring how things actually work. Resources for the executive branch are limited and Presidents all the way back to Washington have had to make decisions on what to prioritize. All Obama did was prioritize the prosecution/deportation of certain types of cases over others. Meanwhile, he has deported people at a faster rate than any other President in history and net illegal immigration is down.

Studly

Trad climber
WA
Jan 7, 2016 - 06:38am PT
Michael Burry, quoted earlier, what a dumbass. Oh sure, the banking and the lending and the housing collapse was the fault of the borrowers, according to him. We need to take responsibility, it's not the bankers fault. F that guy.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 06:55am PT
Dingus posted
No what he meant is that President Obama has issued more exec orders that he didn't like, than President Bush.

Yes, that's what I was getting at.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 07:07am PT
This was reported a while back but is worth bringing up again. Colorado treated teen pregnancy like a public health problem, started handing out free birth control like we've been trying to do since at least the AIDS crisis and something super predictable happened: teen abortions dropped by 42%. Ironically, Planned Parenthood provides gobs of cheap or free birth control throughout the country (thus preventing millions of abortions) and somehow still gets stigmatized as an "abortion mill."
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 7, 2016 - 08:34am PT
Studly,
You may have misinterpreted the message Burry was conveying if you only read the quote I posted and didn't go to the link.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/12/big-short-genius-says-another-crisis-is-coming.html

Another quote from the link.

As for punishment of those responsible, borrowers were punished for their overindulgences — they lost homes and lives. Let’s not forget that. But the executives at the lenders simply got rich.

I am shocked that executives at some of the worst lenders were not punished for what they did. But this is the nature of these things. The ones running the machine did not get punished after the dot-com bubble either — all those VCs and dot-com executives still live in their mansions lining the 280 corridor on the San Francisco peninsula. The little guy will pay for it — the small investor, the borrower. Which is why the little guy needs to be warned to be more diligent and to be more suspicious of society’s sanctioned suits offering free money. It will always be seductive, but that’s the devil that wants your soul.

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 7, 2016 - 10:34am PT
WaPost:

John McCain proved the power of revenge on Wednesday night when asked about his longtime nemesis Ted Cruz's eligibility to be president, despite being born in Canada.

“I don’t know the answer to that,” McCain said on the "Chris Merrill Show" on Wednesday. “I know it came up in my race because I was born in Panama, but I was born in the Canal Zone, which is a territory. Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona when it was a territory when he ran in 1964."
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 7, 2016 - 10:43am PT
The GOP’s sympathy for sedition

Republican lawmakers began the new year in Washington with new ideas about how to undermine the government in which they serve.

On Wednesday, the first legislative day of the year, House conservatives gathered with reporters for their monthly “Conversations with Conservatives.” When the questioning turned to the armed rebellion in Oregon against the authority of the federal government, these representatives of the United States stood with the rebels.

“And I think civil disobedience has been something for the most part that the liberal media used to stand up for, but apparently there’s some exceptions to that when us conservatives and pro-Second Amendment people are trying to exercise that same right of civil disobedience. So it’s pretty frustrating.”

No, Congressman. Civil disobedience is when people break laws they think unjust and then peacefully face the legal consequences. The takeover of a federal wildlife facility in Oregon by armed men is sedition.

But it’s hard to govern when your caucus is so hostile to government that it has sympathy for seditionists. Asked about the Oregon situation, Ryan deferred to Rep. Greg Walden, a member of GOP leadership who represents the area — and, as The Post’s Mike DeBonis noted, Ryan nodded agreement as Walden spoke.

Walden made clear that “an armed takeover is not the way to go about it,” but he had sympathy for the rebels. “These people just want to take care of the environment — they really do,” he said. “And it is the government that all too often ignores the law.”


Such as: when lawmakers sworn to uphold the Constitution applaud those who take up arms against the government.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 10:51am PT
A good column from Charles Blow about the racial history of gun control in America.

Here he quotes from Adam Winkler's book Gun Fight.
“The KKK began as a gun-control organization. Before the Civil War, blacks were never allowed to own guns. During the Civil War, blacks kept guns for the first time — either they served in the Union army and they were allowed to keep their guns, or they buy guns on the open market where for the first time there’s hundreds of thousands of guns flooding the marketplace after the war ends. So they arm up because they know who they’re dealing with in the South. White racists do things like pass laws to disarm them, but that’s not really going to work. So they form these racist posses all over the South to go out at night in large groups to terrorize blacks and take those guns away. If blacks were disarmed, they couldn’t fight back.”
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 01:09pm PT
Who needs a $2,700 donation when honkies be dropping $10 million checks?

WASHINGTON—Maurice R. “Hank” Greenberg, who built American International Group Inc. into a world-wide financial powerhouse before its controversial government bailout, has donated $10 million to the super PAC backing Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush, making him one of the largest contributors in the 2016 race.

Mr. Greenberg joins the ranks of a handful of supersize donors. A group of super PACs backing Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has collected some of the largest checks of the election from donors including the Wilks family of fracking billionaires ($15 million), hedge-fund manager Robert Mercer ($11 million) and private equity-fund founder Toby Neugebauer ($10 million).
Jorroh

climber
Jan 7, 2016 - 03:15pm PT
"into a world-wide financial powerhouse"
Thats pretty funny. A "powerhouse" so powerful that it needed a $250 billion donation (thats nearly $1000 from every person in the USA) in order to stay afloat.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2016 - 07:13pm PT
Reagan and Bush debating illegal immigration. Yes that's Reagan advocating for an "open border."
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 7, 2016 - 11:40pm PT
Good find. Bush thinks we shouldn't criminalize good people and Reagan thinks building a wall is dumb.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 8, 2016 - 06:59am PT
The US added 292,000 jobs in December bringing the total net job growth to 2.65 million for 2015. The unemployment rate stayed at 5.0% because lots of new people started looking for work and began counting as "unemployed" again. Unfortunately, this comes just as China's economy continues to falter and threatens global economic growth. You'll note that despite the media reports and political rhetoric, America's economy has been faring much, much better than pretty much any other developed nation.

*edit* The jobs numbers for October/November got revised upwards a total of 50,000 as well.

Two Iraqi refugees in America were arrested on terrorism related charges after they were found to have traveled to Syria to fight with ISIS. (When will Obama finally focus on terror?)

A FOX News gaggle accused Obama of faking tears during his address on gun control and criticized him for not doing more about gun control earlier in his Presidency:

[Click to View YouTube Video]



Maine's contentious Republican governor with a hard libertarian bent said a thing:



Two men quietly holding signs ("America's already great" and "God bless President Obama" respectively) were verbally harassed and then had their signs snatched and torn by people sitting near them. They then continued to quietly sit until security threw them out a few minutes later.

[Click to View YouTube Video]



The Department of Defense accidentally sent a Hellfire missile to Cuba instead of to Europe for a training exercise back in 2014. We've been trying for a year to get Cuba to give it back but it is apparently a huge loss of weapons technology.

The widow of Chris Kyle (of American Sniper fame) told Obama that "we can't outlaw murder" as part of prelude to a question about gun control.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 8, 2016 - 07:11am PT
HDDJ,
Would you advocate for an open border?

EDIT:
George Soros believes another economic crisis similar to 2008 is coming.
The Chinese stock market is now tanking.
The American stock market is now getting very jittery and my 401K needs massaging.
Most who are not on a government check of some kind are getting nervous.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 8, 2016 - 07:16am PT
George Soros believes another economic crisis similar to 2008 is coming.
The Chinese stock market is now tanking.
The American stock market is now getting very jittery and my 401K needs massaging.
Most who are not on a government check of some kind are getting nervous.

Yeah it's a little worrisome. It shows how a globalized economy requires increased global cooperation. You aren't actually in competition with someone if when they lose you lose.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 8, 2016 - 08:35am PT
President Obama:

Even as I continue to take every action possible as president, I will also take every action I can as a citizen. I will not campaign for, vote for or support any candidate, even in my own party, who does not support common-sense gun reform. And if the 90 percent of Americans who do support common-sense gun reforms join me, we will elect the leadership we deserve.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/opinion/president-barack-obama-guns-are-our-shared-responsibility.html?_r=0
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 8, 2016 - 10:47am PT
Today's last article, in which Charles Koch complains about not having enough political influence.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 8, 2016 - 12:42pm PT
OK I lied. Steve Israel's explanation of the money hunt and why he is leaving Congress is too good not to post:

Washington — IT’S now safe to pick up your phones and read your emails. That’s right, I won’t be calling to ask you to donate to my congressional campaign. As I announced on Tuesday, I’ll be leaving Congress at the end of this term — sentimental about many things, but liberated from a fund-raising regime that’s never been more dangerous to our democracy.

In the days after my first election to Congress, in 2000, I attended several orientation sessions in Washington, eager to absorb the lessons of history. I wanted to learn what Congressman Abraham Lincoln had learned, to hear the wisdom of predecessors like John Quincy Adams, Daniel Webster and Joseph Gurney Cannon. The romance was crushed by lesson No. 1: Get re-elected. A fund-raising consultant advised that if I didn’t raise at least $10,000 a week (in pre-Citizens United dollars), I wouldn’t be back.

The money race began, and I attended political action committee fund-raisers, which are like panhandling with hors d’oeuvres. There were hours of “call time” — huddled in a cubicle, dialing donors. Sometimes double dialing and triple dialing. Whispering sweet nothings and other small talk into the phone in hopes of receiving large somethings. I’d sit next to an assistant who collated “call sheets” with donor’s names, contribution histories and other useful information. (“How’s Sheila? Your wife. Oh, Shelly? Sorry.”)

Since then, I’ve spent roughly 4,200 hours in call time, attended more than 1,600 fund-raisers just for my own campaign and raised nearly $20 million in increments of $1,000, $2,500 and $5,000 per election cycle. And things have only become worse in the five years since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which ignited an explosion of money in politics by ruling that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in elections.

I saw the consequences firsthand.

As chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, I was invited to glamorous Washington galas, the ones where thousands of eyes make no eye contact, where pupils constantly rove in search of someone more powerful. At one dinner, in 2012, I was chatting with a powerful Republican congressional colleague. Despite the fact that the Democrats were in the minority, our campaign committee had in recent years equaled or surpassed the G.O.P. in fund-raising. My colleague amiably congratulated me and then added, “But in the end our guys will have more super PAC money than your guys.”

He was right. Early one morning, as I was headed from New York to California to stump for Democrats, I received a staff member’s urgent call. G.O.P. groups, she told me, had bought $2 million of TV time against one of our incumbents the previous night. We needed to match them to maintain parity on the air. We juggled dollars, shuffled resources and sent panicked email appeals to our donors that read, “IT’S OVER!!!” and “ALL IS LOST!!!” Luckily, we managed to cover the gap.

Hours later, I landed in Los Angeles. My phone rang. The same staff member repeated the same crisis. Annoyed, I said, “We handled this already!” She responded: “No, Mr. Chairman. The Republicans dumped in another $2 million when they saw our $2 million.”

This isn’t “Shark Tank.” This is your democracy. But as the bidding grows higher, your voice gets lower. You’re simply priced out of the marketplace of ideas. That is, unless you are one of the ultra wealthy.

Democrats in Congress and all of the party’s presidential candidates strongly support campaign finance reforms. In 2010, when our party was in the majority in the House under Speaker Nancy Pelosi, we passed the Disclose Act, a bill designed to help counter the effects of Citizens United, but Senate Republicans stymied it. Representative John Sarbanes, a Democrat from Maryland, has worked tirelessly with colleagues to pass viable campaign finance measures. As a 16-year veteran of Congress, I’d calculate the probability that the current Republican majority schedules a vote on that bill at: LOL.

There are some small steps we can take. Next week I will attend my final State of the Union speech. I hope that the president will announce an executive order requiring that federal contractors disclose their political spending.

Ultimately, however, the only solution is across-the-board changes in campaign finance. We need “who-gives-what” transparency in real time (not after the damage has been done), shareholder disclosure of all corporate political expenditures and public financing of congressional elections.

But here’s a political fact of life: Not one of these things will be passed by the current crowd in charge. The only hope for reform is to replace the majority that is stopping reform at every turn.

I’ll miss Congress: the history, colleagues on both sides of the aisle, the ability to help my constituents. But on hallowed ground where Lincoln inspired us to oppose slavery, where F.D.R. summoned us after Pearl Harbor, where L.B.J. demanded voting rights for African-Americans, I won’t miss leaving phone messages asking PACs to “max out before the end of the quarter.”

My new “call time” will be spent waiting for a customer service agent to help me decipher a cable bill. Even that will be more pleasant.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 8, 2016 - 10:37pm PT
538 ENDORSEMENT PRIMARY

Jan 8

REPRESENTATIVES
1 POINT EACH

SENATORS
5 POINTS EACH

GOVERNORS
10 POINTS EACH

TOTAL POINTS
Jeb Bush 46
Marco Rubio 38
Chris Christie 26
Mike Huckabee 25
John Kasich 15
Rand Paul 15
Ted Cruz 12
Lindsey Graham 5
Carly Fiorina 3
Scott Walker 2
Rick Perry 1
Rick Santorum 1



Hillary Clinton 457
Bernie Sanders 2
Martin O'Malley 1
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 9, 2016 - 05:39pm PT
That's an interesting concept. I wonder if they based the points on anything empiric. Endorsements haven't counted for sh#t so far in the Republican race.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 9, 2016 - 06:21pm PT

Topic Author's Reply - Jan 9, 2016 - 05:39pm PT
That's an interesting concept. I wonder if they based the points on anything empiric. Endorsements haven't counted for sh#t so far in the Republican race.

To be fair, nobody has a single delegate sewn up. It's pretty hard to tell what has counted for what.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 9, 2016 - 06:33pm PT
Sure, but they could base the importance of different endorsements on delegate performance.
monolith

climber
state of being
Jan 9, 2016 - 07:04pm PT
538 is all about associations between data and results, so yeah, it's a good predictor. However, Trump may be a confounding factor.

In presidential primaries, endorsements have been among the best predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So we’re keeping track.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 9, 2016 - 07:39pm PT
So Jeb Bush is the nominee?

Not happening.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 10, 2016 - 09:43pm PT
538 explains the "hidden primary" in great depth, looking at a whole lot of prior elections.

Jeb should have the same number as Hillary, but he has been stuck for 2 months at the same number. He started out about here, and everyone else was in single digits. It's a race where the leader started walking.

BREAKING NEWS, since I posted that, Marco has gone up another 5 points


Before any votes are cast, presidential candidates compete for the support of influential members of their party, especially elected officials like U.S. representatives, senators and governors. During the period known as the “invisible primary,” these “party elites” seek to coalesce around the candidates they find most acceptable as their party’s nominee. Over the past few decades, when these elites have reached a consensus on the best candidate, rank-and-file voters have usually followed.

In the book “The Party Decides” (2008), the most comprehensive study of the invisible primary, the political scientists Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel and John Zaller evaluated data on endorsements made in presidential nomination contests between 1980 and 2004 and found that “early endorsements in the invisible primary are the most important cause of candidate success in the state primaries and caucuses.”

These endorsements can serve several purposes. In some cases, they directly influence voters who trust the judgment of governors and members of Congress from their party. In other cases, endorsements serve as a signal to other party elites. “It tells others who is acceptable and who is unacceptable,” Cohen, an associate professor of political science at James Madison University, said in an e-mail to FiveThirtyEight. “This is the coordination process that we believe goes on during the invisible primary and by way of public endorsements that was formerly and more formally undertaken at the convention.”
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 10, 2016 - 09:48pm PT
So, John E,

It seems to me that one of the most fundamental theorems of GOP economics is the oft-cited "Trickle down effect". If you create a system that puts more money in the hands of the wealthy, all will benefit.

However, that seems to be contradicted by actual financial performance of the private sector of the last 15 or more years.

There has been tremendous enhancement of wealth of the wealthy, but that has not trickled down, at all. AT ALL.

If this most fundamental principle of conservative economics is wrong, isn't everything that is built upon is also likely to fail?
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 11, 2016 - 04:04am PT
Ken M,
If I could interject some here on the income inequality gap.

Aside from technology tending to drive income inequality,
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-12/deflation-hits-oldest-profession-world-hookers-numbers
income variations in society are generally a result of different choices leading to different consequences.
You choose to drop out of high school, or you choose to get a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education?
You have your children out of wedlock, or you have them within a marriage?
Free people in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.

What jobs do the 1% have?
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/newsgraphics/2012/0115-one-percent-occupations/index.html

Here is a good article that addresses another aspect of the income divide:
Far more than in previous generations, clever, successful men marry clever, successful women. Such “assortative mating” increases inequality by 25%, by one estimate, since two-degree households typically enjoy two large incomes. Power couples conceive bright children and bring them up in stable homes—only 9% of college-educated mothers who give birth each year are unmarried, compared with 61% of high-school dropouts. They stimulate them relentlessly: children of professionals hear 32m more words by the age of four than those of parents on welfare. They move to pricey neighborhoods with good schools, spend a packet on flute lessons and pull strings to get junior into a top-notch college.
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21640331-importance-intellectual-capital-grows-privilege-has-become-increasingly?fsrc=scn%2Ftw%2Fte%2Fpe%2Famericasnewaristocracy

So are we dumbing down to Idiocracy?
Look at this 8th grade exam from 1912. You might have to select and zoom it to see well, sorry
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 11, 2016 - 05:10am PT
Larry posted
If I could interject some here on the income inequality gap.

Aside from technology tending to drive income inequality,
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-12/deflation-hits-oldest-profession-world-hookers-numbers
income variations in society are generally a result of different choices leading to different consequences.
You choose to drop out of high school, or you choose to get a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education?
You have your children out of wedlock, or you have them within a marriage?
Free people in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.

The premise here is that everyone has equal opportunity to make those choices. Not many people make a calculated choice between sex work and high finance. I'm not sure if you intended it but perpetuating this kind of idea that "well poor people made a free choice in a free society" is just another form of poor shaming.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 11, 2016 - 09:47am PT
Larry.... good post.

Jorroh

climber
Jan 11, 2016 - 10:02am PT
"If this most fundamental principle of conservative economics is wrong"

I don't think thats really in doubt.
Really the biggest and most damaging failing isn't in concentration of wealth and to a lesser degree income,it's been the horrendously bad allocation of capital throughout the entire modern neo-liberal era.
Its been bad for numerous reasons, almost all of which point back to a core neo-liberal philosophy.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 11, 2016 - 02:39pm PT
The premise here is that everyone has equal opportunity to make those choices. Not many people make a calculated choice between sex work and high finance. I'm not sure if you intended it but perpetuating this kind of idea that "well poor people made a free choice in a free society" is just another form of poor shaming.

And the perpetrators of the notion that government is the great equalizer that can somehow make the calculated choice for them is just another form of stealing from those that do and giving it to those that won't.
raw

Mountain climber
Malibu
Jan 11, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
Gotta love timely #9 under History!
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Jan 11, 2016 - 07:44pm PT
Don't fool yourselves boys...We are all 1 hospital stay away from being bankrupted...It's called the trickle up theory and we're all unwilling participants...
7SacredPools

Trad climber
Ontario, Canada
Jan 11, 2016 - 08:37pm PT
Bought travel medical insurance today. I can go anywhere, except the US. If I vacation there the premium costs 50% more. By far the most expensive health care in the world according to my broker.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 11, 2016 - 10:33pm PT
I have to agree with the "false choice" that is presented. It would be like saying that someone who made a choice not to take advanced calculus and differential equations sat down and made a career choice and choice as to income potential.

We have to remember that half of America is below average intelligence, has below average income, has below average parents, below average health.

The fact is that NOTHING except gov't is in the position to change what happens to people who have the deck stacked against them.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 04:46am PT
We have to remember that half of America is below average intelligence, has below average income, has below average parents, below average health.

The fact is that NOTHING except gov't is in the position to change what happens to people who have the deck stacked against them.

People are succeeding everyday with all of the "disabilities" you mention because they have above average will, drive and desire.

The government is in the single most absolute worst position to help these people and I no longer care to give them my money to screw it up.

I'll make you a deal, if you stop forcing .gov to steal from me, I'll let you spend as much of your own money as you like trying to help the people you mention in your post.

Are we good?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 05:20am PT
Escopeta- I'll make you a deal: stop perpetuating myths about poverty and pretending that you are being victimized by having to pay taxes and I'll listen to what your core ideas are.

I work with lots of people who work extremely hard and have to hold down second jobs (in addition to their full time jobs) to make ends meet. It's definitely not because they lack "drive." I don't make more money than they do because I work harder, it's because I have advantages (some innate, some environmental) that they do not and have had opportunities that they have not.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:02am PT
For starters, let's be clear. I really don't care if you listen to my core ideas or not. So right off the bat, that's not much of a deal for me.

Secondly, if you are of the opinion that government is in the best position to help "these people" as you call them (of which I am one apparently) by taking money and giving it to them or legislating a stacked deck then clearly you are in need of a dictionary as you have lost grasp of the word 'myth'.

The single best solution is to give people the freedom to make their own choices to earn, donate, live and choose how they see fit and every piece of legislation chips away at the one thing that allows "these people" to be successful.

Also give me one reason why I shouldn't be able to comment on how my tax money is being spent?


HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 06:22am PT
Escopeta posted
For starters, let's be clear. I really don't care if you listen to my core ideas or not. So right off the bat, that's not much of a deal for me.

You clearly care, that's ok. It's ok to care. It's not weakness.

Secondly, if you are of the opinion that government is in the best position to help "these people" as you call them (of which I am one apparently) by taking money and giving it to them or legislating a stacked deck then clearly you are in need of a dictionary as you have lost grasp of the word 'myth'.


I didn't call anyone "these people?" Not sure what you're referring to. Our government has done huge amounts to alleviate the suffering of the American people. A robust questioning of the role of government is important and necessary but when you start buying the "government is the problem" propaganda you've lost touch with reality. Our government has lots of problems, lots of inefficiencies, lots of misplaced priorities. They're all worth discussing. "Government can do nothing to help people" is political propaganda and nothing more. I assume you're intelligent enough to understand the difference.


The single best solution is to give people the freedom to make their own choices to earn, donate, live and choose how they see fit and every piece of legislation chips away at the one thing that allows "these people" to be successful.


Relatively unfettered capitalism created the Gilded Age of the late 19th and early 20th century. The American middle class was engineered by American government policy after the excesses of the previous age ended in economic disaster. We all support the basic ideas of "freedom of choice" but without certain protections capitalism eventually results in the "freedom to choose" but in reality that is a platitude, not a policy. When politicians say "freedom to choose" what they mean is the freedom for the powerful to enact the policies of their choosing like paying people in company currency, not paying overtime or dictating how employees spend their compensation.

Also give me one reason why I shouldn't be able to comment on how my tax money is being spent?

Again, you're projecting something that was never said. There is a difference between "commenting" and "pretending to be victimized." When you claim the government is "stealing" because you have to pay taxes in a representative democracy you are in fact playing the victim and not engaged in informed citizenry.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:41am PT
Stealing is when something is taken from you that you would like to keep. You don't get to make up your own definitions. Language is important.

The government IS the problem. That's not propaganda. That's an informed opinion from someone that has lived in this country long enough to see it. This isn't beta for a route I haven't climbed. I've sent it.

And when a politician says they are giving you the "freedom to choose" by legislating it, it actually means exactly the opposite. I trust you're intelligent enough to tell the difference.

And no, I truly don't care whether or not you listen to my ideas. I have no desire to change your mind via some random interweb forum. My responses are for my own benefit and anyone else that likes to read. So forgive me, your opinion's only value is that it creates a nice counter point.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:49am PT
+1 Escopita
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:50am PT
Move to Somalia, you'll be government free.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:57am PT
It's a great place to start a business, too.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:03am PT
Move to Somalia, you'll be government free.

Since we are on the subject of intelligence....

People that suffer from the lack thereof and create the assumption that government is somehow a binary condition is exactly how we got in this mess.

The inevitability of someone implying that anarchy is the only outcome of less government than we have today is about as immutable as Godwin's law.

Freedom is a scary, messy and unpredictable thing and I don't begrudge people for not having the character to manage it. I only ask that you allow those that do the opportunity to flourish under it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:10am PT
Escopeta posted
Stealing is when something is taken from you that you would like to keep. You don't get to make up your own definitions. Language is important.

Haha oh man. Either you're trolling or you're serious and I'm going to have a hard time not trolling you. In the spirit of keeping this thread civil I will just move on. "Taxes are theft" is a juvenile notion.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:13am PT
The Governor of Kentucky is making Obamacare permanent while pretending to dismantle it. He is getting rid of the exchange (which is completely unnecessary because Healthcare.gov works really well) while continuing the Medicaid Expansion. If that's what Republican governors need to do to fool conservatives into doing the right thing, I'm cool with it.

GOVERNOR BEVIN INITIATES PLANS FOR TRANSFORMATIVE MEDICAID PROGRAM
FRANKFORT, Ky. (Dec. 30, 2015) – Today, Governor Matt Bevin and Health and Family Services Secretary Vickie Yates Glisson announced plans to develop a transformative Medicaid program for Kentucky. Governor Bevin has requested Mark D. Birdwhistell, a former Secretary of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, to assemble a team of experts to assist in the drafting of a Medicaid waiver solution for the Commonwealth that addresses the financial unsustainability of the current Medicaid program.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:23am PT

Jan 12, 2016 - 07:03am PT
Move to Somalia, you'll be government free.

Since we are on the subject of intelligence....

People that suffer from the lack thereof and create the assumption that government is somehow a binary condition is exactly how we got in this mess.

I thought you didn't care what we think?

Anyway, you're the one doing the extreme government bashing. You went there first.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:27am PT
So any criticism of the government and the amount of control they exercise, or the amount of freedom they extract is extreme government bashing? Good grief.


Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:31am PT
"Taxes are theft" is a juvenile notion.

Implying that our current taxation system is anything more than 10% collective infrastructure support and 90% wealth re-distribution is a much more dangerous notion.

dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:35am PT
Your taxes = theft/militia sympathies are pretty big clues.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:37am PT
It clearly mostly redistributes money from the middle class to the rich

And why is that do you think?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:38am PT
Quien esta Escopeta?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:41am PT
Escopeta posted
The government IS the problem. That's not propaganda.

The government is in the single most absolute worst position to help these people

And the perpetrators of the notion that government is the great equalizer that can somehow make the calculated choice for them is just another form of stealing from those that do and giving it to those that won't.

So any criticism of the government and the amount of control they exercise, or the amount of freedom they extract is extreme government bashing?

Language is important.


I can't imagine how people think you're "government bashing." Clearly they are projecting other people's opinions onto you. Language is important, people!

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:46am PT
Escopeta posted
Implying that our current taxation system is anything more than 10% collective infrastructure support and 90% wealth re-distribution is a much more dangerous notion.


Please add up the "90% wealth redistribution for me."
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:47am PT
Un don nadie. Un escalador sólo en mi mente más. Pero un cazador para siempre

Hay mucha gente aquí que saben de mí , pero sólo unos pocos que me conocen

Y no se muchos palabras - lo siento
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:48am PT
Please add up the "90% wealth redistribution for me."

Is this a trick question? You already did it for me.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:50am PT

Is this a trick question? You already did it for me.

Ok, answer received. GL with the trolling.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:58am PT
I'll take because the rich have bought and sold the politicians for a thousand, Alex.

And you would be right.

Daily Double now: Multiple Choice

Why are those rich people able to buy off said politicians:

A) Because the government has control of so much that they have the ability to do favors through the budget and expenditure process.

B) Because the morass of regulations, laws, and administration makes it virtually impossible to be successful without coddling to the politicians

C) Because the politicians, regardless of which side of the "isle" they sit on are united in their desire to expand the role of government, therefore solidifying their place in every Americans life?

D) All of the above
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 08:01am PT
Ok, answer received. GL with the trolling.

I was serious.

Let's try this. What part of your pie do you think is "collective infrastructure" expenditure and not wealth re-distribution. Realizing that the terminology is a very loose definition.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 08:19am PT
You're asking me to quantify false distinctions. "Wealth redistribution vs infrastructure" is your conceptual construct, not mine. You made an assertion, so back it up.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 08:33am PT
OK, then in that case you did, in fact, do it for me.

If you don't agree with the assertion, then discredit it rather than give me a homework assignment.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 09:03am PT
Sorry, the only fantasy world I'm entertaining this week is one where I'm going to win the Powerball. Specious arguments like "the entire US federal budget is theft" isn't something I need to waste my time on. If you want to make a factual argument then make a factual argument. I'm not interested in propaganda. Avoiding homework does not seem to have served you well so far, this might be a good time to start doing some.


In the real world:

President Obama's last State of the Union is tonight at 9 pm EST. The SOTU response will be given by Governor Nikki Haley.

Trump and Cruz are in basically a dead heat in Iowa. There are 20 days until the Caucuses.

Sanders is looking like he might take Iowa and the Clinton campaign staff is worried. Passionate turnout for Obama tanked her in 2008's Iowa Caucuses and gave legitimacy to Obama's campaign.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 09:21am PT
Specious arguments like "the entire US federal budget is theft" isn't something I need to waste my time on

Is this the person that accused me of trolling? Good Grief.

I am perfectly comfortable with allowing the casual reader to asses your posted pie chart and make their own determination of how much government largess and wealth redistribution is occurring in good ole 'Murica.

Will they call it 90/10? 75/25? 50/50? It matters not. But anyone that looks at it and doesn't connect the dots that draws a picture of an out of control government fixated on its own expansion should probably not procreate.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 09:35am PT
I am perfectly comfortable with allowing the casual reader to asses your posted pie chart and make their own determination of how much government largess and wealth redistribution is occurring in good ole 'Murica.

Will they call it 90/10? 75/25? 50/50? It matters not. But anyone that looks at it and doesn't connect the dots that draws a picture of an out of control government fixated on its own expansion should probably not procreate.

You're perfectly comfortable with allowing the casual reader to assess the federal budget, make a judgement of which parts of it fall into undefined categories that you invented and then, regardless of what made up ratio they decide upon, if they do not conclude that the world is how you say it is they shouldn't have children? This is your argument?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 09:42am PT
Sounds about right.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 10:04am PT
I can't imagine why people aren't taking you seriously.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:08am PT
Yo comprendo, Escopeta.

But you still don't make any sense.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:21am PT
the cool thing about escopeto is that if one accepts the 10 percent good, 90 percent bad, then that means he wants the federal budget to be 330 billion dollars. And even if you spent every penny of that on the military, which by the way would be impossible because some of that money needs to go to the people who collect it, but lets not quibble. So even if every dollar of it goes to the military, then he wants to cut the militaries budgets by more then 50 percent.

Hows that for finding the silver lining?

Thanks Escopeto. Cutting the militaries budget is something that we can agree on.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:24am PT
I can't imagine why people aren't taking you seriously.

At least my ego only extends to speaking for myself. In my defense, I did say 'probably' so I left the door open about procreation.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:34am PT
oops.. looked at the pie chart again..

veterans benefits = 160 billion
servicing the debt = 230 billion


160 + 230 = 390 billion dollars. And thats if you never want to pay down the debt.

So I guess under Escopeto's budget plan, we can't afford any military. Or I suppose we could renege on paying the benefits, but I imagine china would have something to say if we didn't pay the debt. So sorry all you americans. We have to close the military. And you chumps with no legs.. cause you served your country, well, screw you too I guess. Welcome to Escopeto land.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:38am PT
It appears I've struck a nerve with John M.

The phrase "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" comes to mind.

EDIT: WS quote is in no way intended to be a commentary on the gender, or lack thereof, of the intended party.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 10:39am PT
You're right. "If you don't agree with me based on a pie chart you probably shouldn't have children" is something only the humblest of men makes.








Lest we bore people to death, here is the SOTU as a Wes Anderson film:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:43am PT
no nerve struck here. Just simple math.

so what would you spend 330 billion dollars on? or what do you think the federal budget should be? since you say 90 percent is just wealth redistribution. Or do facts and numbers mean nothing to you?

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:54am PT
If we spent only what was needed for national defense as opposed to spending it on global intervention, domestic spying and foreign entanglements with no clear objective, that $330 B would look like an extravagance also.

Maybe we could start there?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:58am PT
Let's try this. What part of your pie do you think is "collective infrastructure" expenditure and not wealth re-distribution. Realizing that the terminology is a very loose definition.

I'd give that one a go, even though I largely agree with Escopeta's viewpoints. To me, "collective infrastructure" consists of what economists would call "public goods." A public good is one for which there is no pracitcal ability to exclude, and therefore no market demand. Public protection, including defense, police and fire protection, most roads, etc., are examples. So, in its way, are regulations that give us cleaner air and water, or otherwise provide an external benefit or reduce an external cost.

Looking at HDDJ's pie chart, which is consistent with the numbers I've seen, it is readily apparent that more than half is income redistribution. I don't find that necessarily theft, however. There is also the economic concept of a "merit good," meaning a good or service to which the society in general believes every member is entitled to a certain minimum amount. For example, I think a hugely overwhelming majority of Americans believe that no one should lack at least a minimal amount of food, clothing or shelter, even if they cannot pay for it.

In addition, a society where every member receives at least some amount of education (as opposed to the indoctrination gulags we seen at times) is better off than one that produces those who want an education, but can't afford one. This, too, is both a merit good and a public good, because we cannot exclude those who don't pay from the benefits of a properly educated society.

That said, the problem with budgetary pie charts is that they only show the total expenditures, not who pays for them. Because of the unequal tax rates, a small percentage of California taxpayers provide a huge share of its overall budget. While the U.S. tax burden isn't quite so skewed, it still accomplishes a substantially redistributive result that the budget pie cannot measure.

I guess in the end, I can only conclude that the budget pie could be completely appropriate. I personally don't find it all that far out of whack, although as a conservative, I would only approve the use of "subsidy" in a sentence of approval if that sentence also includes "eliminate." The problem may not be how we spend our money so much as how we collect it.

And, as HDDJ reports, the reality is that the misState of the Union is at 6:00 p.m. PST. (After we bailed out New York in the mid-1970's I refuse to use Eastern time.)

;>)

John
Norton

Social climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 10:59am PT
Maybe we could start there?

and which political party would be more conducive to agreeing with your idea?

then why do you vote for the other one?
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 11:03am PT
I do fully agree that we need to reduce our military and how we use it.

What do you think that we should be spending on a military? You are the one who threw out the first number. So get serious. How much would you spend on a military?

On wiki you find different amounts for different countries. The next highest is China at supposedly 220 billion. Would that amount be appropriate to you, or less? Just asking because I'm trying to understand where you are coming from. I fully agree that we need to reduce our military.

I suppose that I'm asking because you threw out the 10 percent 90 percent number and since we have a current budget of 3.3 trillion dollars. That leaves just 330 billion to spend if that is your true number. So lets start with.. is 330 billion dollars you real total budget for America?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 11:04am PT
Norton, was your question intended for me? If so I'm not sure I understood it.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 11:10am PT
JohnE, I have a real problem with how you think. I don't know how to exactly explain my position, so will have to think about it some more, But as an example, and this isn't well thought out, I have a real problem with your notion that wealth distribution is the wealthy pay for more then their fair share. Especially based on the biblical notion that to whom much is given, much is required. But also on the understanding that the wealthy have more to protect, so benefit more by protection. And benefit more by roads which service their businesses.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 11:13am PT
John posted
While the U.S. tax burden isn't quite so skewed, it still accomplishes a substantially redistributive result that the budget pie cannot measure.

It's not quite so skewed because Republicans have successfully pushed more of the tax burden onto the middle class who have, in turn, leveraged regressive taxes and fees on the lower class.

The assumption here is always that compensation is appropriately distributed to begin with. Capitalism is redistributive to the point where millions of people are unable to meet basic daily needs. Where it not for this flaw, free market capitalism would be a perfect system. It isn't, which John thankfully is human enough to acknowledge.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 11:38am PT
I loved the scene in the movie "Cinderella Man", where Braddock makes some prize money on his boxing comeback, returns to the welfare office and pays them back what he previously received.
It was shameful to be on welfare in those days.

Our popular culture has murdered shame and gratitude.

Ask not, what your country can do for you... oh, never mind.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:15pm PT
The common argument here is that the absence of a government program somehow leaves nothing in place of it.

But the absence of over-burdening regulations, a coercive government and wealth re-distribution is not nothing. Its thriving free individuals, a growing economy without the burdens of over-taxation and crony capitalism. Its people helping each other by forming communities for common purpose.

How delusional do you have to be to look at the robust system that is the United States and see nothing beyond what the government provides?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 12:17pm PT
And I loved how in that other movie when everyone was well fed, safe, content and got their dream job. Sorry, Larry, but that's just more propaganda. Most welfare recipients still do not want to be on welfare.

John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:19pm PT
Its people helping each other by forming communities for common purpose.

we the people.. thats government. right or wrong.. thats what it is. Can it be overbearing? for certain. Can it get out of balance? For certain.. but its delusional to think that replacing it with..

"Its people helping each other by forming communities for common purpose"

is anything different.


dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:27pm PT
Escopeta, can I have a toke?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:27pm PT
It is 100% absolutely, without question and completely different.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 12:29pm PT

Escopeta posted
How delusional do you have to be to look at the robust system that is the United States and see nothing beyond what the government provides?

You'd have to be pretty delusional. Luckily I don't see anyone posting anything like that. Are you delusional?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:30pm PT
Escopeta, can I have a toke?

Since someone brought up the ridiculous concept of "Merit Goods", you might do well to freshen up on the definition of a "Demerit Good"
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:31pm PT
are you rokjox?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:32pm PT
And I loved how in that other movie when everyone was well fed, safe, content and got their dream job. Sorry, Larry, but that's just more propaganda. Most welfare recipients still do not want to be on welfare.

Which is exactly why wealth re-distribution is hidden under various euphemistic names, hidden budget line items and feel-good labeled government programs.
Norton

Social climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:36pm PT
So Escopeta

who did you vote for President in 08 and 2012

appreciate your answer as i am having a hard time figuring out just what is your bias?
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:36pm PT
No, no Ayn Rand titsucking going on here...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 12:38pm PT
Escopeta: First you say that "90% of the federal budget is wealth redistribution." Now you're saying that it's "hidden." Which is it? Is Medicare wealth redistribution or is it a liberal shell program to funnel money to undocumented immigrants? Is the defense budget mostly a handout to "welfare queens" who turn around and sell hellfire missiles to Cuba?

This must be one of those bits of conservative magic like when Obama is both a total pussy and an oppressive tyrant at the same time. Or like how he's both a socialist and a crony capitalist.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:38pm PT
I suppose that I'm asking because you threw out the 10 percent 90 percent number and since we have a current budget of 3.3 trillion dollars. That leaves just 330 billion to spend if that is your true number. So lets start with.. is 330 billion dollars you real total budget for America?

Back to the question. Is $330B enough? Is $500B enough? Its hard to say but I can tell you I would be comfortable with it.

But honestly if people think a 90% haircut is too much, lets do less. How about 50%? Or even 25% reduction.

To me, its a start and I would love to see us rip off the band-aid until it starts taking skin and work backwards from there.

Of course it won't happen, the country grows and government expands to fill the void....
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:48pm PT
So basically you throw out numbers like 10 percent okay.. 90 percent bad.. so that you get a response. The problem is that this causes intelligent people to wonder how delusional you are.

and I stand by my statement. there is no difference between "government" and" people getting together". because it all comes down to people. The power hungry often take control because the average person doesn't want to spend the resources that are required to overcome the power hungry, so no matter what size of .. we the people.. that you are talking about.. its still people. I lived in a tiny community for 25 years. The power hungry still controlled things, because most people don't have that much wisdom and will follow the person who screams the loudest and the longest. Then there is a small core of people who have enough wisdom to realize the false path, but they rarely have enough power to counter the power hungry. Is it easier among a few people to affect change? Certainly can be. And it can also be harder.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:51pm PT
SNAP, TANF, Lifeline, WIC. They sound neat and cool and invigorating. What are they?

Hidden is the wrong word. Disguised is a better one.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 12:55pm PT
nd I stand by my statement. there is no difference between "government" and" people getting together". because it all comes down to people

I'm sorry, there is no such thing as forced charity. The thing you are talking about is called coercion.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:01pm PT
I don't think anyone who knows what they acronyms stand for is under any delusion that they aren't programs to help people. I don't have a problem with helping people. I'm sorry that you seem to. I am also sorry that so many people are still under the delusion that people on welfare are happy to be on welfare.
Norton

Social climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:07pm PT
Is that you, Ayn?

come on fess up, girl

who do you vote for, McCain, Romney, or Obama?

no need to be shy or embarrassed, let us know where you stand politically
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:08pm PT
I don't have a problem with helping people. I'm sorry that you seem to.

Can you point to something I said where I have a problem with helping people?

I simply don't like subcontracting it out to the government who doesn't do it very well.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:11pm PT
private groups aren't that great at it either.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:17pm PT
Since someone brought up the ridiculous concept of "Merit Goods", you might do well to freshen up on the definition of a "Demerit Good"

I'm that somebody, and I stand by the concept. I think most on the forum know my politics, but even conservatives have compassion. With that in mind, perhaps a "demerit good" could be something from which everyone should be free, even though they cannot afford the cost of escaping it. And that's not only a legitimate government function, its a necessary one unless you want to enable freeloaders.

And John M and HDDJ, I take issue with the idea that the highest incomes don't pay their "fair share" because they pay a much greater share of their income than I do. I'm quite firmly entrenched in the middle class since my depression ended my legal career, but I don't see what gives me the right to say that people who involuntarily devote a greater percentage, not merely amount, of their income than I, should pay more so I can pay less. While I agree that to whom much is given, much is required, I also believe that I should not impose a higher burden on others than I shoulder myself.

If you want to be Biblical, the standard was proportional giving (i.e. a flat tax), except for the temple tax, which was a poll tax. Maybe if I made it to the highest marginal rates, I would feel differently about imposing it on others, but I find it hypocritical - and therefore wrong - for me to seek to impose a higher burden on others than I pay myself.

John
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 01:50pm PT
While I agree that to whom much is given, much is required, I also believe that I should not impose a higher burden on others than I shoulder myself

A flat giving rate is a starting point guide. The teaching "to whom much is given, much is require" is a higher teaching. And that teaching is not restricted to giving in church. It is a universal Truth. What people who have their understanding based on biblical teachings don't seem to understand is that teachings were given as people were able to understand them. so the 10 percent tithe was a lower teaching. To whom much is given much is required is a higher teaching and requires a higher depth of understanding. It doesn't simply apply to a flat tax which means those who make more are still paying more. It just doesn't. and I don't know how to help you understand that. It goes way beyond that. Its not a flat tax with a straight line gradient, it is a curve. The top of that curve is God, to whom everything is given, thus from whom everything is given.

I have no problem with a progressive tax rate. How we spend the money is where I have serious problems.

And on that note.. I need to go get some exercise and get off the taco. Take care John.

And HDDJ.. you have been smoking hot lately. Very right on. I highly appreciate your input. You have a big heart which I appreciate very much.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 12, 2016 - 02:02pm PT
And on that note.. I need to go get some exercise and get off the taco. Take care John.

And HDDJ.. you have been smoking hot lately. Very right on. I highly appreciate your input. You have a big heart which I appreciate very much.

You too, John. By the way, I agree with your interpretation of what Christ requires of Christians. I just don't believe in imposing that same requirement on non-Christians, for the same reason I don't believe in using the legal system to impose Christian morality generally on non-believers.

The tithes were what the Law required of the poorest Jew. The offerings were above the tithes, for those who had more. For Christians, we are commanded to offer our whole lives. As Tony Campolo says, the hymn doesn't say "I surrender ten percent."

And I hate to admit it, HDDJ, but your posts have been excellent of late, even if your reasoning leads you to the wrong conclusions.
;-)

John
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 02:56pm PT
Fivethirtyeight.com state projections are now out. Many states are not included, because of insufficient polling data, but Iowa is available.


http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-republican/
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 12, 2016 - 03:00pm PT
Thanks, dirtbag. Hillary is still at 73%, which doesn't surprise me, but the size of Cruz's apparent lead does.

John
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 03:05pm PT
I had heard that Cruz has been polling well in Iowa lately. It will be interesting to see if the birthplace issue sticks.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 03:21pm PT
Yes, but this is a little different.

The birther issue was a proxy for racism, invoking some weird conspiracies.

This issue is more of a legal question for Cruz. From what I understand, it shouldn't block Cruz from being eligible, although an op-ed contributor for the Post disagrees. But it is interesting to see how it will play out. Trump and some establishment types apparently think it might work, not necessarily legally, but in stirring the pot a bit.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 04:35pm PT
no need to be shy or embarrassed, let us know where you stand politically

No offense Norton, but are you retarded? Because if you don't know where I stand politically from reading my past several posts, telling you who I cast a ballot for in the last two elections isn't going to help you.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 05:29pm PT
^^^Chicken.^^^^
Norton

Social climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 05:37pm PT
No offense Norton

oh no offense taken!

so who did you vote for in 08 and 12, McCain, Romney, or Obama?

simple questions, very easy to answer, so why not answer and not deflect?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 05:40pm PT
Because its more fun when you don't get what you ask for. No other reason really.

It was a good guess apparently.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:09pm PT
I'm too busy watching the Blue Notes and the Devils on tape delay to bother with that mishegas.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:24pm PT
wealth distribution is the wealthy pay for more then their fair share.

It is definitely not.

We've gone through a period now, where the redistribution has been TO the wealthy.

However, "fair" is a very loose term. The way you use it seems to say "more than they want to pay"

But the wealthy get a very dispropotionate share of gov't services: They get a free police force to protect their properties and persons.
(for some reason, gangs don't carry out kidnappings on poor people)

They get free court systems to protect their business interests

They get free transportation infrastructure to move their goods service and people around

They get a gov't that negotiates tariffs and treaties that allow them to accumulate international wealth.

The poor have little use for most of that, but the wealthy have a lot to be thankful for.
John M

climber
Jan 12, 2016 - 06:27pm PT
I don't believe in using the legal system to impose Christian morality generally on non-believers.

John,

what is your stance on abortion? I can't remember what position that you have taken.

and thanks for the kind words.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:05pm PT
Notice how the entire red side of the aisle remained seated through standing ovation when BHO said: "it's time to reduce the influence of money in politics." .....
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:21pm PT
Notice Kim Davis, county clerk from Kentucky sitting in the crowd
at the State of the Union. . .

What am I missing here????
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 07:34pm PT
Did they bring a rope for her?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:37pm PT
Escopeta posted
SNAP, TANF, Lifeline, WIC. They sound neat and cool and invigorating. What are they?

I think you answered your own question.


thebravecowboy posted
Notice how the entire red side of the aisle remained seated through standing ovation when BHO said: "it's time to reduce the influence of money in politics." .....

I didn't catch it yet. I'm assuming they basically stayed seated for the whole thing. Showing a modicum of respect for a non-Republican President is grounds for persecution these days.

SteveW posted
Notice Kim Davis, county clerk from Kentucky sitting in the crowd
at the State of the Union. . .

What am I missing here????

Maybe the last 6 or 7 years of politics I guess? Where have you been?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 07:52pm PT
John posted
And John M and HDDJ, I take issue with the idea that the highest incomes don't pay their "fair share" because they pay a much greater share of their income than I do. I'm quite firmly entrenched in the middle class since my depression ended my legal career, but I don't see what gives me the right to say that people who involuntarily devote a greater percentage, not merely amount, of their income than I, should pay more so I can pay less. While I agree that to whom much is given, much is required, I also believe that I should not impose a higher burden on others than I shoulder myself.

If you want to be Biblical, the standard was proportional giving (i.e. a flat tax), except for the temple tax, which was a poll tax. Maybe if I made it to the highest marginal rates, I would feel differently about imposing it on others, but I find it hypocritical - and therefore wrong - for me to seek to impose a higher burden on others than I pay myself.

I didn't claim that they didn't pay their "fair share" but let's assume I did. I find it a little absurd that someone who clearly understands some slightly above basic economics wouldn't also know that value changes with income. $10 is $10 but $10 is "worth" very different amounts to different people depending on how much money they currently have. The wealthy are not wealthy because they somehow require more money to meet their basic needs. Trying to argue that 15% of your income is as "equal" to a millionaire as it is to a single mother making $15,000/year is absurd economically, much less morally.

The only people arguing for a Biblical tax are Biblically oriented people. You'll note that the tithe did not cover the taxes the government imposed, that was just the money the church demanded from it's worshipers.

I do not see a problem with asking those that are benefiting by our economic and political system be the ones who pay to keep it running. In fact, that seems like the only morally sound way to do it.


John M posted
nd HDDJ.. you have been smoking hot lately. Very right on. I highly appreciate your input. You have a big heart which I appreciate very much.

JohnE posted
And I hate to admit it, HDDJ, but your posts have been excellent of late, even if your reasoning leads you to the wrong conclusions.
;-)

Awwww you guys are embarrassing me. I just really appreciate that you both are willing to engage in earnest debate.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 08:00pm PT
I would just as soon not put the government in a position to make morality decisions. Regardless of the context.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 08:01pm PT
dirtbag posted
Fivethirtyeight.com state projections are now out.

Thanks for this. Cruz at 49% which means he is the most likely individual candidate to win but it is still more likely someone else will win. Gotta love it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 12, 2016 - 08:03pm PT
Escopeta posted
I would just as soon not put the government in a position to make morality decisions. Regardless of the context.


You're right. Let's make sure the government isn't deciding when to go to war or how to prosecute criminals or how to punish them or how policing should be enacted or anything that might put a government official into a situation where morality might be involved. We should leave that to religion.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 12, 2016 - 08:06pm PT
What on earth do any those things have to do with morality?
T?S

Trad climber
Reno, NV
Jan 12, 2016 - 08:08pm PT
60 Years ago, when the Russians beat us into space, we didn't deny that Sputnik was up there, we didn't argue about the science, or shrink our research and development budget... We built a space program almost overnight and 12 years later we were walking on the moon.

-President Obama


Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jan 13, 2016 - 12:15am PT
RE: highest incomes tax rate:

Generally the income tax system is roughly progressive except for many of the extremely rich (top 400) who mostly have investment earnings and not much ordinary income. Capital gains is taxed at a much lower rate.

So their average tax rate dropped from 28% in the early 90s to 18% under the Bush giveaway and has risen back to 23% today with recent hikes.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/13intop400.pdf

The three recent hikes were:
1. The ACA also imposed the Medicare tax on investment income at a rate of 3.8%. investment income can come from capital gains, dividends, interest, rental income and annuities. Applies to whichever is less -- your investment income or the amount that your modified adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds the high-income threshold.

2. A higher top income tax rate: For those with taxable income over $400,000 ($450,000 if married), the fiscal cliff deal raised their top income tax rate to 39.6%, up from 35% previously.

3. Higher capital gains and dividend tax rates: For those with taxable income over $400,000 ($450,000 if married), their rate on dividends and long-term capital gains is now 20%, up from 15% previously.


Of course that comparison doesn't include most of the Soc. Sec tax, which hits the middle income earners the hardest.
Nor does it include the highly regressive sales tax system, which means the rich often pay a lower percent of total taxes than their share of earnings.

For the moderately rich (top 5-15%) - Federal income tax rate goes up, but they don't pay Soc. Sec tax beyond the first $118,000 in earnings.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jan 13, 2016 - 12:21am PT
Another thing I learned today:
Nixon was a traitor just like Reagun.

Nixon & his people (acting as a private person in violation of the Logan Act) attempted to interfere with Johnson's peace talks in SE Asia.

Just like Reagun traded a promise of arms for hostages before he was even elected.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/08/12/george-will-confirms-nixons-vietnam-treason
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 05:11am PT
I find it rather amusing how many pepole trot out their tired arguments and platitudes opposing Republicans - who for the record are only interested in their brand of government expansion- but really don't have good answers for arguments opposing anyone that advocates for a return to real individual liberty, actual freedom and a reduction in the overal size and influence of the government.


HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 05:23am PT
I find it amusing when Lois says "who is this Lois person? Please, tell me about him!"

Louiscopeta posted
I find it rather amusing how many pepole trot out their tired arguments and platitudes opposing Republicans - who for the record are only interested in their brand of government expansion- but really don't have good answers for arguments opposing anyone that advocates for a return to real individual liberty, actual freedom and a reduction in the overal size and influence of the government.

Then stop trotting out tired arguments and not having good answers. Give and ye shall receive, my friend.



Splater posted
For the moderately rich (top 5-15%) - Federal income tax rate goes up, but they don't pay Soc. Sec tax beyond the first $118,000 in earnings.

Thanks for a solid content post, Splater. That's probably the segment hit the hardest by taxes proportionate to income though they do get a break on the entitlements. They make enough to pay the highest rate but not enough to start engineering tax shelters and whatnot.

Most economists seem to agree that killing a lot of the deductions that we give (including the mortgage interest deduction) and then lowering overall rates is the way to go and I'm all for that so long as the effective rates stay progressive and revenue is projected to be neutral. The problem is that Republicans see this as a way to give out massive tax cuts to the wealthiest (as evidenced by literally every tax plan by Ryan and the Repub presidential candidates).


SOTU: This was a great moment. Even Ryan dug it.

http://youtu.be/wuI0fP4kc64?t=894

The section correcting the absurd rhetoric around America's strength and ISIL's relative threat to our country was a breath of fresh air.

http://youtu.be/wuI0fP4kc64?t=1951

I kinda dug the tough guy talk too. "If you come after Americans, we will come after you. It may take some time but we have long memories and our reach has no limit." In the context of the rest of what he's said it sounded appropriate.


SOTU Response:

Props to Nikki Haley for a bit of humility and reality in her speech. She and Obama basically said the same thing about Washington being broken and the tone of politics.

http://youtu.be/LNz40oI17ts?t=132

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:21am PT
I imagine I'm not the only person that is having a hard time wrapping their head around the hypocrisy that claims $15 is somehow less valuable to a millionaire than it is to a struggling mother of two.

And then turns around and claims that the millionaire somehow "benefits" more from the blanket of protection that .gov provides than the mother of two and should therefore pay more.

Wouldn't it stand to reason that if the $15 is more "valuable" and difficult to replace to the mother of two that she, in fact, benefits more from those services?

I mean, if you want the rich people to support others on their coat tails, why not just be honest and say it rather then jump through your butt trying to rationalize that it somehow makes sense in a supposed "free" country.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:30am PT
Most economists seem to agree that killing a lot of the deductions that we give (including the mortgage interest deduction) and then lowering overall rates is the way to go and I'm all for that so long as the effective rates stay progressive and revenue is projected to be neutral.

So, if revenue stays neutral, and the rates stay progressive, tell me again what would actually change?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 07:34am PT
Morning, Lois. How's the day? Still out west?


Escopeta posted
I imagine I'm not the only person that is having a hard time wrapping their head around the hypocrisy that claims $15 is somehow less valuable to a millionaire than it is to a struggling mother of two.

And then turns around and claims that the millionaire somehow "benefits" more from the blanket of protection that .gov provides than the mother of two and should therefore pay more.

That isn't what I said at all. I said that the millionaire is doing much better by the American political-economic system and should therefore bear the brunt of the costs of that system. The millionaire is a millionaire because our American system is working for them. If Americans all worked the same job for the same wage then paying the same tax rates would be just fine...but it isn't.

So, if revenue stays neutral, and the rates stay progressive, tell me again what would actually change?

Economists don't support lowering rates and eliminating deductions because they want to lower tax revenue, it's because deductions skew the economy in ways that do not always makes sense and create growth (or prevent it) in unhelpful ways. Look up why they do not like the mortgage interest deduction, for instance. (just kidding, we both know you're not here to learn things)
zBrown

Ice climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:42am PT
For the sake of clarity take just one rich guy, Mitt Romney, and look at how he has benefitted from the system (in ways that others simply cannot) and how he avoided participating in it's military aspects.

AND

Haven't heard much about this lately.

“When I ran for office in 2010, the debt was an enormous issue and the debt was $10 trillion,” Mr. Paul said Friday on the Senate floor. “Some of us in the tea party were concerned because it had doubled in the [previous] eight years. It doubled from five [trillion dollars] to 10 under a Republican administration. And many of us were adamant that Republicans needed to do a better job. We had added new entitlement programs, we had added new spending, and the deficit got worse under Republicans. Now we’re under a Democrat president, and it’s set to double again.”
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:55am PT
Making a blanket statement like "economists don't want to lower the revenue base" or "economists agree that getting rid of the mortgage deduction...." Is pretty disingenuous.

I'm an economist, and I don't think that at all. The economists that happen to like your brand of maximum government revenue, tax and spend, and wealth redistribution might say that but selling it as this foregone conclusion, while also castigating me for not having a reasonable debate is silly.

Edit: Quotations used as paraphrase as I'm on a plane and it's hard to cut and paste.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 08:49am PT
Louiscopeta, your shtick is super boring. Fly safely.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 13, 2016 - 08:50am PT
Most economists seem to agree that killing a lot of the deductions that we give (including the mortgage interest deduction) and then lowering overall rates is the way to go and I'm all for that so long as the effective rates stay progressive and revenue is projected to be neutral.

HDDJ.... you do this and the housing industry will go down the tubes.


And HDDJ... how come you start calling Escopeta names??

I thought YOU stood for good debate. You need to toss crap at someone who disagrees?







guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 13, 2016 - 08:52am PT
Louiscopeta, your shtick is super boring.

See what I mean?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 08:56am PT
I don't think I ever called her names. What she's doing isn't debating. She's playing a game and it's dull. If she posts some content or stops repeating talking points I am more than eager to engage. I am totally fine with people disagreeing with me but just repeating buzz words and acting offended/outraged isn't a debate, it's just dumb.

guyman posted
HDDJ.... you do this and the housing industry will go down the tubes.


Yeah I thought so too but the more I've read about it the more I've been convinced. Currently it's largely a handout for people who don't need it (which I'm pretty sure is the kind of thing Republicans typically oppose).

*edit*

Mortgage interest deduction mostly goes to rich people who would own homes anyway.

The mortgage interest deduction mostly makes people buy larger houses.

Those don't seem like good goals of government policy and we currently spend more on the interest deduction than we do on actual housing programs.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Jan 13, 2016 - 09:04am PT
What she's doing isn't debating

How, by asking questions you can't or won't answer?

ps
Are yer two links to The Idiot's Guide To Economics?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 09:04am PT
Which question is that?

ps- epic burn!! lulz
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 13, 2016 - 09:07am PT
I don't think I ever called her names. What she's doing isn't debating. She's playing a game and it's dull. If she posts some content or stops repeating talking points I am more than eager to engage. I am totally fine with people disagreeing with me but just repeating buzz words and acting offended/outraged isn't a debate, it's just dumb.


OK, you win... but calling Escopeta Lois is wrong of you. If anybody can be accused of just rolling out talking points its YOU. But don't worry your on a roll, as they say.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 09:09am PT
Really? Which talking points am I repeating?
Ay Aye

Social climber
MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Jan 13, 2016 - 09:19am PT
Beware of the unforseen...

Fear-mongering has returned to the fatherland.

Have you been comprimised?

Have you been coerced, brain washed, and assimilated by one political machine or another?

Or can you create your own philosophy and think for yourself?
Beware...

The Mole Men are coming.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 09:24am PT
Now that's some rhetoric I can get behind.
Norton

Social climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 09:33am PT

Escopeta IS "L.E.B." aka.....Lois, the greatest internet troll on earth

back again after being banned four previous usernames

same old same old

take a hike, Lois

back to the nurses' station you go
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 13, 2016 - 10:43am PT
what is your stance on abortion? I can't remember what position that you have taken.

You can't remember because I haven't taken a position on it. I don't see a consensus on the issue, and for that reason, I would not make it illegal. That said, I think it is a fair political question, so I also think Justice Blackmun's opinion in Roe v. Wade misses the mark.

I will say this about abortion. A very liberal Protestant pastor, and a very conservative Catholic priest were discussing the morality of abortion the way climbers discuss just about anything -- i.e. they were arguing. Both eventually came down to Old Testament arguments about whether life begins at conception, or at birth. Just then, they saw an Orthodox rabbi walk by, and decided to see what his views would be on their Old Testament interpretations.

Consequently, they asked the rabbi, "Rabbi, when does life begin?" The rabbi thought for a while, then responded, "When does life begin? When the kids are done with college and the dog dies, that's what life begins!"

John
dirtbag

climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 11:06am PT
It's interesting that what people remember, and are talking about, most from last night's state of the Union address rebuttal isn't Haley's criticisms of Obama, but her criticisms of the frontrunner for the presidential nomination of her own party.

When has something like that happened?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 12:08pm PT
She also acknowledged the Confederate Flag as a symbol of division and Dyann Roof as a domestic terrorist. Prominent Republican acknowledges reality: literally news.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 13, 2016 - 12:24pm PT
The concept of home ownership---shared ownership of a community---seems desirable on many fronts. Stability of the community, stability of the economy, etc.

Gov taking an action that facilitates those at the lower end being able to access and become part of that community seems reasonable to me.

However, the deduction is a straightforward money transfer of tax dollars.

But I don't see the need for this handout for people of substantial means. Nor for 2nd or third homes.

But I don't think a simple vote to end is the way to go. A phase out over time, and a phase lowering of what's covered, would seem to be reasonable.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 13, 2016 - 12:25pm PT
Prominent Republican acknowledges reality: literally news.

Only to Democrats.
;-)

John
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 13, 2016 - 12:32pm PT
Love to see her comments on Robert Louis Dear.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 02:39pm PT
I don't know who Lois is or Louis or whoever you are referring to.

I don't understand why you think that whatever you are doing is rational debate, while my comments, suggestions and observations are not.

You generally won't see me comment on much related to the Republican candidate vs the Democrat candidate because I find that akin to critiquing the music being played while the Titanic sinks. I prefer to focus on the big picture.

I'm sorry that you have apparently come to the conclusion that there is no chance that the U.S. can return to a land of personal liberty, individual freedom and a minimal or even reduced government. But that doesn't mean I will stop advocating for it.

If you want this thread to simply be an expression of thoughts and support for totalitarianism, that's fine. I'm happy to bow out just like I'm not going to comment on thread regarding how great sport climbing is.

But you show your ass when you just take pot shots then complain that I'm incapable of rational debate.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 02:53pm PT
^^^^^Another fine example of not caring what we think.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 02:57pm PT
Go lie down.
SteveW

Trad climber
The state of confusion
Jan 13, 2016 - 03:43pm PT

hddj
I've been quite aware of what's been going on in the world in the
last 6 or 7 years.

My question is who invited her to the State of the Union speech.
I don't think it was a Demotard. . .
Norton

Social climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 03:57pm PT
Take another hike, Lous

StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jan 13, 2016 - 04:09pm PT
It is pretty easy for the religious right to pull the strings and have their republican puppet dance on over to get Kim Davis invited. It would be interesting to know which one it was.
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jan 13, 2016 - 04:24pm PT
Super PAC's, Citizens United etc. are destroying democracy in this country. We are being sold down the river by the uber-rich, and the Supreme Court isn't doing a damn thing about it, because they are owned as well.

Skull and Bones are the real rulers of the US. They own both sides and can orchestrate any sort of drama that suites their designs, anywhere in the world. The rest are just pawns.

The NWO is already here.

dirtbag

climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 04:55pm PT
Cruz is now officially f*#ked, royally.


But the couple’s decision to pump more than $1 million into Mr. Cruz’s successful Tea Party-darling Senate bid in Texas was made easier by a large loan from Goldman Sachs, where Mrs. Cruz works. That loan was not disclosed in campaign finance reports.



http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/us/politics/ted-cruz-wall-street-loan-senate-bid-2012.html?_r=0
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 13, 2016 - 06:52pm PT
Escopeta
But you show your ass when you just take pot shots then complain that I'm incapable of rational debate.

I haven't said you're not capable, just that you aren't doing it. I'm sure you have some actual ideas beyond "freedom is good" and "all taxes are theft." Go on. Take a gander.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jan 13, 2016 - 06:58pm PT
dirtbag, I'm sure that was just some simple miscommunication.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:05pm PT
Oh no doubt!
dirtbag

climber
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:15pm PT
It's like losing quarters between the couch cushions.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:21pm PT
Huckabee joins the Republicans with questions about Cruz’s eligibility

"When it first surfaced, I didn't think it did," Huckabee said. "But after now reading a number of very thoughtful pieces by constitutional experts, yeah, I think it should give everybody a little concern. It's an issue that's got to be dealt with. There was one article from Lawrence Tribe, and there was another from a professor who wrote in The Washington Post, and it was very compelling argument. It was not a political argument. This person gave very serious reasons as to why this was a serious question."


In a few words, Huckabee became at least the fourth rival to Cruz to ask whether his eligibility could be questioned. Carly Fiorina cited "legal scholars" who had judged the issue "legitimate." Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who had once brushed off the question, suddenly called it a potential problem. And then there was Donald Trump, whose predictable obsession with the topic seemed to finally end the mutual admiration pact between Cruz and himself.

That would have been bad enough, had Republicans as eminent as RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Gov. Terry Branstad (R-Iowa) refused to simply call Cruz eligible, or call the question ridiculous.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 13, 2016 - 07:34pm PT
That isn't what I said at all. I said that the millionaire is doing much better by the American political-economic system and should therefore bear the brunt of the costs of that system. The millionaire is a millionaire because our American system is working for them. If Americans all worked the same job for the same wage then paying the same tax rates would be just fine...but it isn't.

So the implication here is that the system is working for the millionaire but not working for everyone else? How do you explain his/her success opposite the mother of two then?

A flat rate tax system would automatically mean that the millionaire pays more because they are apparently doing better within the framework (the same framework as everyone else?)

So the conundrum is still evident. If the millionaire doesn't assign the same value to the $15 (which I think is an absurd concept but I'm willing to play along) than the mother of two working 2 jobs then, in fact, the mother is benefiting more from the government system than the millionaire.

Why should he not only pay more, which he would in any case, but rather he pays progressively more based on how successful he is? Which ultimately results is distribution of benefit to someone else?

The Laffer curve, even if you don't agree with any given deflection point, has to become reality at some tax rate. Why take away the incentive for the millionaire to succeed while simultaneously holding the mother of two in her current position?

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 05:50am PT
Escopeta posted
So the conundrum is still evident. If the millionaire doesn't assign the same value to the $15 (which I think is an absurd concept but I'm willing to play along)

If this were not true then a millionaire and a working poor person would make nearly identical purchasing choices.

Escopeta posted
the mother of two working 2 jobs then, in fact, the mother is benefiting more from the government system than the millionaire.

Thank you for arguing an actual point instead of just a platitude. You're struggling with this because you are looking at the "government system" as somehow a distinct and separate entity. It's not. There's an American system of which the government is a part. Additionally, the millionaire has better access to the justice system, the political system and is better served in basically every way by the government. The poor person may get a few thousand dollars a year in government assistance, but is getting worse services in virtually every other manner. It's a tough argument to make that the "government system" is benefiting the poor person the most. For someone who thinks that the entire government budget is "theft" and "wealth redistribution" I can see how projecting that sense of outrage onto everything would lead you to that conclusion.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:09am PT
If it is an "American System" of which the government is a part. Then removing some amount of government would, in theory, leave this "American System" still meaningfully intact?

In your opinion, how much of the government part (which in this particular case I am using as a proxy for taxes) of this "American System" can be removed before it is no longer the American System?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:17am PT
Cruz obtained $1 million of loans from Goldman Sachs and Citibank that were not disclosed on campaign finance paperwork. At worst the FEC will fine his campaign. The political fallout is still unknown but I'm willing to be it will be minimal. Democrats will holler and most Republicans just won't care. Cruz might have peaked, however, for unrelated reasons.

Marco Rubio supported a cap and trade system for carbon emission control 7 years ago.

Bernie Sanders supporters desperately want this tweet to mean the end of the Clinton campaign. (I can't wrap my head around it)



In a moment The Onion meets South Park meets reality, the town of Whitesboro in New York has voted to keep their village emblem which is literally a white settler choking a Native American.

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:17am PT
As a follow up separate question. You claim that "the millionaire has better access to the justice system, the political system and is better served in basically every way by the government"

This may have just been typo, but above that you mentioned that its not the "government system" that the millionaire benefits from but rather the "American System" of which the government is a part. Yet in the quote above, you clearly make the distinction that its the gov that he benefits from.

Did you mean to say specifically the government here or were you intending to say the "American System" from your previous comment?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:22am PT
Also, since I'm new here and I can pretty much predict some type of dumbass comment coming from either Norton or Dirtbag in the near future, do you guys generally just ignore those retards or how does that work?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:23am PT
Escopeto posted
If it is an "American System" of which the government is a part. Then removing some amount of government would, in theory, leave this "American System" still meaningfully intact?

I can't decide if I should answer "yes, of course, because our country is completely modular like a computer" or "of course not, because the government has it's evil, dark, slimy tendrils wrapped around the soul of America and to attempt to remove it would rend flesh and sinew, mortally wounding it" so I'll just toss them both out there.

I don't really see the point of this question. "Removing some government" is such a weird thing to say. I'm pretty sure we don't ladle government out of a bucket.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:25am PT
Welcome to the LIBERLAND sh#t show drum circle..

Escopeta
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:26am PT
Escopeta asked
Also, since I'm new here and I can pretty much predict some type of dumbass comment coming from either Norton or Dirtbag in the near future, do you guys generally just ignore those retards or how does that work?

As pyro demonstrated, you just rely on other people to make dumbass comments defending you.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:29am PT
I can't decide if I should answer "yes, of course, because our country is completely modular like a computer" or "of course not, because the government has it's evil, dark, slimy tendrils wrapped around the soul of America and to attempt to remove it would rend flesh and sinew, mortally wounding it" so I'll just toss them both out there.

Assuming its somewhere in between those two ends of the spectrum, where would you put it? You had mentioned earlier I think that you would be comfortable with changes to the tax code as long as the overall "revenue" base stayed the same. Should I infer from that, again using taxes as a proxy for "government", that any amount of decrease would upset the apple cart of the "American System" you spoke of? Also, I'm going to stop using quotes since its a PITA and it also seems mocking which isn't the intent.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:33am PT
As pyro demonstrated, you just rely on other people to make dumbass comments defending you.

Is that what dirtbag and norton are doing? Making stupid comments defending you? That makes sense because you jumped all over me claiming I wasn't engaging properly on the thread yet sat silent as they played with their own feces. I get it now.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:35am PT
You're awfully literal. No, they weren't "defending me" but there is an unfortunate chasm that has developed over the last decade or so and most of the posters who engaged in earnest (if heated) discussion have left or stopped engaging and what is left are people who are mostly in the habit of tossing bombs or posting political cartoons.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:38am PT
Also, on the subject of editing posts. You obviously made a flippant comment, then went back to edit it. Is there protocol for that? Obviously, I've gone back and edited some posts for spelling, grammar, etc (as best I can) but try to use a footnote if I change content.

Hows that work? And why did you edit your post?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:41am PT
Escopeta posted
Assuming its somewhere in between those two ends of the spectrum, where would you put it? You had mentioned earlier I think that you would be comfortable with changes to the tax code as long as the overall "revenue" base stayed the same. Should I infer from that, again using taxes as a proxy for "government", that any amount of decrease would upset the apple cart of the "American System" you spoke of? Also, I'm going to stop using quotes since its a PITA and it also seems mocking which isn't the intent.

I'm comfortable with all kinds of changes. What I posted was a specific idea based on specific recommendations made by a broad spectrum of economists that is up for discussion. I'm interested in outcomes.

Taxes are not a proxy for government, that's a political ploy made by people who want lower taxes. We could have a 100% volunteer government that was insanely intrusive or an extremely expensive government that provided no infrastructure, services or regulation of any kind. We had much, much higher taxes 50 years ago but Republicans tell us all the time that government has only gotten more inept, less effective and more intrusive (i.e. bigger in Republican parlance) since then. Both things cannot be true.


Also, on the subject of editing posts. You obviously made a flippant comment, then went back to edit it. Is there protocol for that? Obviously, I've gone back and edited some posts for spelling, grammar, etc (as best I can) but try to use a footnote if I change content.

I sometimes cannot resist my darker urges. I answered snarkily and immediately changed the post. I saw several minutes ago that you replied to it so I already went back and readded it.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:48am PT
I had a hard time understanding your answer there through the commentary. Was it that you aren't comfortable with any reductions in the overall tax/revenue level?

If so, would it be safe to infer that you are of the opinion that even MORE taxes/revenue would make the American System even MORE better and the millionaire becomes a billionaire for example and the mother of 2 improves her lot in life a relative amount?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 07:23am PT
If so, would it be safe to infer that you are of the opinion that even MORE taxes/revenue would make the American System even MORE better and the millionaire becomes a billionaire for example and the mother of 2 improves her lot in life a relative amount?

That's an absurdly facile way to look at how things work. I'm not sure what you're trying to get to here. Increasing tax revenue increases tax revenue.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 07:31am PT
I'm trying to get you to answer a single question to be truthful.

You said that the millionaire benefits more from the American System than the mother of 2. And that the government (in this case, taxes) plays a part in that overall American System that benefits the millionaire.

You used that same justification for the millionaire paying a disproportionately larger amount of taxes.

I think what I'm really trying to understand is that how big of a part does the government play, in your mind, in this American System you refer to. Is it a big part, or a little part.

One of the ways to try and understand that is by asking the question - If you remove some portion of it, how much of the American System is left.

If you don't understand the question, I'll try to restate it.

(BTW, you also didn't answer the other question about your potential typo - that's yes or no so should be pretty easy. )



dirtbag

climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 07:37am PT
You're awfully literal. No, they weren't "defending me" but there is an unfortunate chasm that has developed over the last decade or so and most of the posters who engaged in earnest (if heated) discussion have left or stopped engaging and what is left are people who are mostly in the habit of tossing bombs or posting political cartoons.

Not really. It's hard to take someone seriously when they speak in platitudes and self righteous sermonizing "either you are for government stealing/taxation and tyranny or you are a liberty," behaves patronizingly, then gets butt hurt when people don't take him seriously after claiming he doesn't really care what us crude, government leaches think. Mostly he's just a self righteous bore.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 07:52am PT
Escopeta asked
I think what I'm really trying to understand is that how big of a part does the government play, in your mind, in this American System you refer to. Is it a big part, or a little part.

One of the ways to try and understand that is by asking the question - If you remove some portion of it, how much of the American System is left.

Again, you are trying to make modular something that isn't modular. Our government is integral and innate to us, not an alien force. I'm not able to answer your question because I do not believe in the premise of it. I think the discussion you want to be having is about the level of intrusiveness government should have an in what ways which is a perfectly good conversation to have.

dirtbag posted
Not really. It's hard to take someone seriously when they speak in platitudes and self righteous sermonizing "either you are for government stealing/taxation and tyranny or you are a liberty,"

I agree, dirt, but he's not doing that now so he deserves earnest engagement. Join the campfire.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:05am PT
Again, you are trying to make modular something that isn't modular. Our government is integral and innate to us, not an alien force. I'm not able to answer your question because I do not believe in the premise of it. I think the discussion you want to be having is about the level of intrusiveness government should have an in what ways which is a perfectly good conversation to have.

Honestly, the discussion I want to have is the one I'm asking about. I am trying very hard to not put words in your mouth (something that, quite frankly, you have done an awful lot of to me) so I don't want to sit here and try to answer my own questions and then ask you "Is this what you mean?"

I'm not proposing that government, or taxes, or however you define that portion of the so-called American System is modular and that we can simply unplug it in its entirety. But I certainly don't think its reasonable to assume that the piece can't get bigger or smaller respectively.

As you infered, the American System is complex, involving a lot of moving parts of which government and taxes play a part.

How big of a part does it play in your opinion. Big or Small?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:17am PT
To be honest, the public doesn't care much. The debt and deficit are not hot topics in this election. Politicians are avoiding the unpopular issues of raising taxes and cutting programs. In a strengthening economy Democrats aren't going to raise taxes and Republicans aren't going to cut spending. So here we are.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:20am PT
I agree, dirt, but he's not doing that now so he deserves earnest engagement. Join the campfire

Yep, which is why I stayed out of it, until he took a shot.

Barring any more shots, I plan to step out for awhile.
Norton

Social climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:29am PT
I am a registered Republican who voted for Obama twice, has zero regrets and would do it again.

How about you, Escopeta, who did you vote for?

Now don't be a coward and deflect the question
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 08:42am PT
Escopeta posted
How big of a part does it play in your opinion. Big or Small?

In my opinion government plays a big part in our system. I'm pretty sure that's why we are so proud of having a democracy and whatnot.

dirtbag posted
Barring any more shots, I plan to step out for awhile.

C'mon, dirt. Don't be that guy who only posts when it's time to talk sh#t. You're a smart guy, post some content.

Norton posted
Now don't be a coward and deflect the question

C'mon, dude. Escopeta survived the first round of hazing.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:45am PT
To be honest, the public doesn't care much. The debt and deficit are not hot topics in this election. Politicians are avoiding the unpopular issues of raising taxes and cutting programs. In a strengthening economy Democrats aren't going to raise taxes and Republicans aren't going to cut spending. So here we are.

Hard to disagree with that assessment. Which is not only a commentary on the public but also highlights the reality that the Republicans and the Democrats have effectively converged.

Which conjures the Chinese proverb that says:

"If you don't change direction, you might end up where you are heading".
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 08:48am PT
Here is a great article about the future of cars, something which I've posted about before and cannot wait for. Building our cities around cars was one of the dumbest things we ever did as a country.

http://stratechery.com/2016/cars-and-the-future/

Once again, a company, built around the hottest tech in the industry, stole the spotlight at CES. This time, though , the product was not a smartphone, and the company was not Apple. For my money the most interesting news of last week came from a most surprising source: General Motors.

First up was the news that the century-old American car maker was investing $500 million in ride-sharing startup Lyft. Then, a few days later, the company formally introduced the Chevrolet Bolt, a (relatively-speaking) no-frills electric car that promises to go 200 miles on a charge for about $30,000. Perhaps it was the company in question, or simply the timing, but it reinforced the sense that fundamental change is coming to the world of transportation.

What is interesting, though, is that while change is certainly coming, it is coming on multiple axes: The Lyft news is about the secular shift from individually owned-and-operated automobiles to transportation-as-a-service, while the Chevrolet Bolt is about how the cars themselves are made. Meanwhile, Google, Uber, Tesla, and others are working on obviating the need for a driver at all. To put it another way, when it comes to questioning the future of transportation, the “What?”, “How?”, and “Where?” are all in play.

THE FUTURE IS HERE?
It’s easy to predict a future where all of these trends coalesce: electrically-powered self-driving cars, summoned from our smartphones, take us where we need to go with plenty of time to finally beat Candy Crush. After all, the trends all reinforce each other:

The simpler drivetrain of an electric vehicle rearranges what matters when it comes to building a car: the engineering that matters is more software and less mechanical, opening the door to software companies that are vastly more suited to developing self-driving technology
Electrical vehicles have (relative to gas-powered cars) higher fixed costs but lower marginal costs. This is a natural fit with ride sharing services focused on reducing the average cost per ride. Range is a concern, but a car with an exchangeable battery based out of a central depot (much more viable for a transportation company than an individual) could work well

Similarly, self-driving cars remove the largest cost from ride-sharing services: the driver. This has import beyond any one ride in question: the big prize is consumers giving up cars completely, which would result in ride-sharing utilization increasing exponentially
So it’s set then. Welcome to our carless future.


The article continues and is worth a full read.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:55am PT
In my opinion government plays a big part in our system. I'm pretty sure that's why we are so proud of having a democracy and whatnot.

Ok. Cool. Although, let's not get carried away. Lot's of countries have a Democracy. A Democracy doesn't equate to freedom as even our country has proven.

So then it sounds like based on that and your previous comments around the millionaire benefiting more from the American system, which government plays a large part, your opinion would indicate that the millionaire exits because of the government, rather than in spite of it?

Again, not trying to put words in your mouth, just trying to connect the dots.


EDIT: Maybe another way of asking is to say that if the millionaire should pay more because he benefits more from American System vis-a-vis the Government, is it logical to say that if we have more government, we would have more Millionaires? Because that would also mean that with less government, the mother of 2 suffers more?

If not, then why?



dirtbag

climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 08:55am PT
C'mon, dirt. Don't be that guy who only posts when it's time to talk sh#t. You're a smart guy, post some content.

Thanks. I didn't mean step aside for a few days or weeks, but stay out of the discussion you're having with him for now. Plus, I need to get some things done!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 09:17am PT
Haha, fair enough, dirt.


Escopeta posted
EDIT: Maybe another way of asking is to say that if the millionaire should pay more because he benefits more from American System vis-a-vis the Government, is it logical to say that if we have more government, we would have more Millionaires? Because that would also mean that with less government, the mother of 2 suffers more?

If not, then why?

Again, you're acting like government gets ladled out of a bucket. "If some melted cheese is good then more is better!" Additionally, you continue to adhere to a conservative political construct or "more" or "less" government. Those words don't actually mean anything and as such I don't find that to be useful terminology. I'll answer actual policy questions and discuss the role of government, but trying to communicate my ideas using the frame of your political thought isn't going to work because the vocabulary is contrived and meaningless outside a conservative media-centric worldview.

So let me flip this around: Conservative political rhetoric centers around the fact that government has only grown "larger" (whatever that means), more intrusive, more inept and is a barrier to Americans achieving prosperity. At the same time, there are more millionaires living in the US than there ever have been. If the government has become more of a problem, not less of one, why are the numbers of extremely prosperous people increasing?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:26am PT
Building our cities around cars was one of the dumbest things we ever did as a country.


HDDJ... I think your mistaken. Our cities/towns were not built around cars.

The old ones were built around Horses and wagons. The Automobile was made to replace the the Horse and all the labor it took to keep a horse. Bicycles were also invented as a better thing than a horse. The first push to pave roads was so that bicycles could haul ass, around town. Out west the automobile really got going because it is dry, in Southern California, one could follow hard packed dirt roads all over the place.... that's why LA grew up spread out.

But please look at it this way. Nothing in our country is really "designed". Things come along to fill a need, then stuff changes to adapt
to the new conditions. This is the market at work.

Up in Mohave there is a Tesla charging station. Good for Tesla because Tesla owners can maybe make it to Mammoth for some fun on weekends. The government isn't putting in these stations (thank God) its a private deal paying the money to do this to make their cars more attractive.

Is GM going to do the same? Or will some petroleum company add charging stations to existing stations?

When you have that infrastructure electric cars will have a shot.

Americans have always been very quick to take up new things, as long as they are better and cheaper.



HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 09:34am PT
guyman posted
HDDJ... I think your mistaken. Our cities/towns were not built around cars.

The old ones were built around Horses and wagons. The Automobile was made to replace the the Horse and all the labor it took to keep a horse. Bicycles were also invented as a better thing than a horse. The first push to pave roads was so that bicycles could haul ass, around town. Out west the automobile really got going because it is dry, in Southern California, one could follow hard packed dirt roads all over the place.... that's why LA grew up spread out.

That's true in the oldest parts of our oldest cities, but pedestrians still dominated the terrain until automobiles. The vast majority of American roads were built after automobiles became the prime mode of transportation. Think about how much space in your average town is dedicated almost entirely to automobiles: the roads, the parking lots. Look at your average supermarket or movie megaplex. It's a large box surrounded by a parking lot 10 times as big that sits empty the majority of the time. Roads are extremely wide because of certain government mandates and people's expectations of what "good roads" look and feel like. We sacrificed rich vibrant community for the ability to leave our communities as quickly as possible.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:41am PT
I'll answer actual policy questions and discuss the role of government, but trying to communicate my ideas using the frame of your political thought isn't going to work because the vocabulary is contrived and meaningless outside a conservative media-centric worldview.

Can you answer it within your frame of political thought using a language that isn't conservative and media-centric? I'll do my best to keep up.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:51am PT
Out west the automobile really got going because it is dry, in Southern California, one could follow hard packed dirt roads all over the place.... that's why LA grew up spread out.

Revisionist history. LA didn't grow and spread out until the inter urban transit system.. Between the Los Angeles railway trolley system and the Pacific Electric system, it became the largest urban transit system in the World.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Railway
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Electric#Interurban_cars

The system was built as a part of land development schemes, which included diverting Owens River water to the San Fernando valley and providing easy transportation to outlying areas to sell cheap desert land. Trolley systems were a common tool to grow cities out. My h100 yr old house in portland is in one of those trolley neighborhoods served by three lines within walking distance. You can still see tracks in the streets.


Then General Motors bought the system and scrapped it so they could sell busses and then so people would have to buy cars.
When they converted trolley to bus systems, they strung double overhead lines, some of which still remain in places like Seattle.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspiracy

In 1950 GM and other companies were convicted of monopoly conspiracy, but they could never make the charge on conspiracy to scrap the system to sell cars stick.

The same thing happened around the country. My grandmother was part of a suit in Milwaukee Wisconsin on the same issue.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:55am PT
Here is a great article about the future of cars, something which I've posted about before and cannot wait for.

You'll probably be waiting for a long time. Electric cars and self-driving cars are swell and all. But until there's innovation or legislation that makes owning gas-powered vehicles less desirable, little is going to change.

It looked like we were on our way ten years ago, when gas prices were steadily climbing and cheap fuel seemed to be a thing of the past. That's no longer the case. Gas is cheap. And we like over-sized rides.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 10:08am PT
Edward posted
You'll probably be waiting for a long time. Electric cars and self-driving cars are swell and all. But until there's innovation or legislation that makes owning gas-powered vehicles less desirable, little is going to change.

This is discussed in the article. Did you read it? We have a generation of techy urbanites who are already growing accustomed to using their smartphones for most things and Uber/Lyft are laying the groundwork for the rest of it. You have Google, Apple, GM, Ford all investing in it. I think it will take a long time for it to reach rural areas (like where I live) but urban centers will transform quickly. Look at Manhattan where owning a car is already an enormous luxury.

Escopeta posted
Can you answer it within your frame of political thought using a language that isn't conservative and media-centric? I'll do my best to keep up.

I don't know what you're asking. Asking me if "more government would mean more millionaires" is an absurdist question. As I've explained, "more government" doesn't mean anything to me. I'm not trying to be obtuse or pedantic, I'm very specifically making the point that you're using political language to ask me questions. It would be like me asking you if you thought perpetuating the "War on Women" was the best course of action for our country.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 14, 2016 - 10:17am PT
Okay
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 14, 2016 - 11:37am PT
Because of liability issues, I don't believe that the US will be an early adopter of self-driving cars. My expectation is that it will be deployed in places like Japan and South Korea first. If it works well, then there will be pressure in the US to change laws to limit deal with the legal limitations.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Jan 14, 2016 - 11:38am PT
Lorenzo said...

Revisionist history. LA didn't grow and spread out until the inter urban transit system..


Revisionist???????? I don't think that is true, Lorenzo.

LA started to grow in the last half of the 1800's... The big RR blasted through and a agricultural boom was on due to several factors: the irrigation projects paid for by the big RR who also traded many Kansas Farmers their 160 acre homesteads and set them us as "semi-tropical fruit growers" in the LA Basin, San Gabriel Valley, Inland Empire and Orange County. As you can see these were very spread out communities and they were served by the RAILROAD. The other main form of transportation were animal pulled wagons and in some cases Ships. The LA Electric Railway first started up around 1901 and laid down tracks to many of these far flung communities.
So as you can see... the Electric Railway was built to serve the need of already existing communities and it enhanced the connection between them and LA.

Not the other way around as you suggest.

And with the invent of the Model T the ability to move around increased even more rapidly and the number of agricultural communities increased in some very out of the way places, not originally served by the RR due to various factors.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 14, 2016 - 12:53pm PT
To be honest, the public doesn't care much. The debt and deficit are not hot topics in this election. Politicians are avoiding the unpopular issues of raising taxes and cutting programs. In a strengthening economy Democrats aren't going to raise taxes and Republicans aren't going to cut spending. So here we are.

I agree, crankster. Anyone who makes honest arguments about trade-offs gets drowned out by the snake oil sales pitches of the other candidates in both parties. We won't recognize the truth that we're in this together. Instead, we want to lay responsibility for needed changes and sacrifice entirely on a set of which we are not members.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 14, 2016 - 01:09pm PT
Building our cities around cars was one of the dumbest things we ever did as a country.

I could not disagree more. Could you imagine what traffic jams would be like (and smell like) if we were all riding horses?

More importantly, private automobiles form the most sophisticated transportation system for humans in areas with appropriate infrastructure for at least the following reasons:

1. The automobile gives its occupants control over their environment. My car is exactly as warm or cool as I want, plays exactly the music or programming I want to hear, and contains only the occupants I desire.

2. The automobile optimizes its owners' time usage. It begins the journey exactly when I am ready. It goes precisely where I want to go. It makes no unnecessary side trips.

3. The automobile allows secure, convenient, trips to multiple areas. With the car, you can shop in multiple destinations without needing to keep what you purchased on your person, or to retun home after each purchase. Similarly, I can go to work, then to the golf course, then to the gym, all without lugging the gear I'm not using on my person all day.

4. The automobile is the most fuel-efficient enclosed powered vehicle for a single occupant. No one disputes that public transportation is fuel efficient per passenger - when it's full. When it's not -- as in the case of, for example, many buses, subways, etc. outside of peak hours -- it is terribly fuel-inefficient.

5. The owner of an automobile still has the option of using public transit when desired. If desired, the automobile owner can still use a bus, train or car pool. It's up to the owner.

The newer urban areas didn't form in a way that accommodates the automobile because of stupidity, but because the residents recognized, and rationally preferred, the advantages of travel by private automobile. The sooner advocates of public transit figure this out, the sooner we may acquire a rational public transit system.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 14, 2016 - 02:47pm PT
I kept my Insurance plan, I kept my Doctor
so calling Obama a liar is a LIE

John, did you keep your Doctor?

Talk about Obama not reaching across the aisle, he tried and tried to get them to work with him

and those damn Republicans just sat on there hands and looked like a pack of treasonous scum bags, do they hate our County that much?
can't they do anything beside work against the Dems?
What have they done? anything that they did do just screwed the average person more.

And then they lie about how he can't get things done, and lie about how he is ineffective, and weak, and this and that,
all lies, all projection of the Republicans failure to do anything of substance, they are weak, they are ineffective, they can't get things done
They are pathetic lairs and scam artists, and only suckers and millionaires would support such a crowd of pure evil.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 14, 2016 - 02:56pm PT
Ted Cruz might as well hang it up

He is not a "Natural Born Citizen"
There are 2 types of citizens, "Natural Born" and "Naturalized"

If you were born in the USA or a territory, you are Natural Born
If you were born outside the USA and become a citizen because your mother was, then you are a Naturalized citizen.

So go ahead and elect him, we will file a suit against him and he will lose.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ted-cruz-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/2016/01/12/1484a7d0-b7af-11e5-99f3-184bc379b12d_story.html


And now it was found out that he took loans for $1 million at extra low interest rates from Goldman Sachs to finance his Senate bid.
His wife works as the Managing Director of Goldman Sachs,

This makes him a Liar.
He's an insider with the big Banks, not a tea bagger that hates the banksters
He lied to the FEC when he didn't disclose these loans.
He lied when he said he saved and liquidated his finances to pay for his campaign.

So he's one big fat liar, just like the rest of the Republicans


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/01/14/10-reasons-that-goldman-sachs-loan-is-a-nightmare-for-ted-cruz/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-f%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 14, 2016 - 03:22pm PT
Meh,

the 14th ammendment says citizenship classification is up to Congress. They already declared John McCain natural born when he ran, even though he was born in unincorporated territory, which the SCOTUS ruled is NOT US soil.
(Panama Canal Zone)
Even if you challenge, the conservative court will probably choose not to hear the case until he's out of office.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 14, 2016 - 03:27pm PT
McCain is challenging Cruz

McCain looked into it back in 2008, and found out that since he WAS Born in a USA Territory he was in the clear.

IF Obama was born in Kenya = Naturalized citizen

So you're way WRONG

It goes back to Common Law, and what the words MEAN
Natural Born means Born inside the Country
Naturalized means born outside and given Citizenship

The constitution clearly States you must be a "Natural Born Citizen" to be President.

It can't any more simple to understand, unless your a Republican and don't like facts, so just ignore them at your own discretion.

vvvv
please provide link to your claim about McCain
and anyway, McCain didn't become President, so it wasn't really challenged
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 14, 2016 - 03:46pm PT
McCain looked into it back in 2008, and found out that since he WAS Born in a USA Territory he was in the clear.

He's playing games.

In the early part of the century the court made the distinction between incorporated territory and unincorporated. You were natural born in the first, but not in the second ( back then the distinction was distinction between places like Hawaii and Panama Canal Zone)


In 1937 they included Panama as a place you could gain natural born status. Unfortunately, McCain was born in 1936. He wasn't natural born.

Congress just passed a resolution to make it retroactive, thus setting the precedent that they get to decide.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 14, 2016 - 03:57pm PT
5. The owner of an automobile still has the option of using public transit when desired. If desired, the automobile owner can still use a bus, train or car pool. It's up to the owner.

Because we have an automobile culture, most places in the US cannot support good public transportation. SF/New York/Chicago are the exceptions. Almost everywhere else sucks. If you are too poor to afford a car, too elderly to drive one, too drunk to drive one, etc. you are SOL. Self-driving cars if they actually do happen, could help solve this.

The newer urban areas didn't form in a way that accommodates the automobile because of stupidity, but because the residents recognized, and rationally preferred, the advantages of travel by private automobile. The sooner advocates of public transit figure this out, the sooner we may acquire a rational public transit system.


Markets do a great job for some things. But it is simply not true that a series of individual choices, that all look reasonable to the individual, always produces the best outcome for the group.

I would prefer to live in a city that has a Paris or London style underground. SF has decent public transportation but getting around inside of they city is mostly buses and surface Muni (Bart mainly gets you in and out of the city). So even taking public transportation is just as a slow as a car. Whereas far more of London or Paris is served underground which doesn't suffer from auto congestion. The free market is not going to create this. Just as GM and the free market didn't build our interstate highway system.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 05:59pm PT
Craig: That's incorrect. You are a natural born citizen if you were born a citizen either because you were born on US soil or to a citizen parent. A naturalized citizen is one who became a citizen through the process of naturalization.

In any case, it's totally bogus idea that you'd need to be born a citizen to be President. An anachronism that we would, were we a rational people, eliminate.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:04pm PT
Republican debate starting and I will be using it as an excuse to increase my post count. You knucklehead should join in.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:11pm PT
I guess Cruz and Christie would start a war with Iran over the 10 sailors held by Iran?
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Jan 14, 2016 - 06:23pm PT
Here is a recent comment of mine from the "Are You Ready for Donald" post:

I was born in Christchurch, NZ. My father was American, my mother a Kiwi. My birth was registered with the US Embassy as a 'citizen born abroad' and I still have the original document. I was acknowledged by the US, at birth, as a US citizen. I was a natural born citizen from birth. I have always thought that I could be president.

New Zealand also recognizes me as a citizen, because my mother was a Kiwi and I was born in NZ; I also have an NZ passport. My daughter, who was born in Seattle, is a US citizen by both birth and parentage; she is also a New Zealand citizen because I was a natural born Kiwi. My daughter has NZ citizenship and also has an NZ passport.

Cruz, although I really loathe the guy, was born American because his mother was an American. If his birth was not registered with a US embassy, however, I think that citizenship vanished. There are reports Cruz' mother voted in Canadian elections; if she did, she had effectively renounced her US citizenship. So, in my supremely considered legal opinion, if Cruz was not registered at birth as a US citizen born abroad, he is not eligible to be president.

Interestingly, Mitt Romney's father George Romney was born in Mexico and was running for president without anyone bringing up all the 'natural born citizen' stuff. And finally, the Repubs can't have it both ways; if Cruz, who WAS born outside the US, can be president, then Obama, who WAS born in the US and who had an American mother, is eligible to be president. The same rule that applies to Cruz has to apply to Obama; the Repubs should apologize for all the bullshit about Obama's birth. But that will never happen.

Edit: I just tried watching the Republican 'debate' and had to turn it off as I couldn't take the bullsh#t. It looks like attack Hillary and Obama night. They live in an alternate reality where facts don't matter and the Kool-aid drinkers are sucking it up.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:32pm PT
Trump is blaming the birther issue on Democrats. This is impressive.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:33pm PT
Dirt posted
I guess Cruz and Christie would start a war with Iran over the 10 sailors held by Iran?

No, the whole premise of their argument is that they are such badasses that Iran wouldn't have dared try it to begin with.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:36pm PT
How would a President Trump unite the party

The party? How about the country?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 14, 2016 - 06:57pm PT
Rubio is going hard right on some of the rhetoric. It's interesting to see how things go with the clock running down.
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jan 14, 2016 - 07:31pm PT

More subsidies proposed to usurp market efficiency -
in regards to Guyman's post about electric charging stations,

SDGE and PG&E have proposed that they be given huge subsidies to set up charging stations. Instead of charging the electric cars the cost, it will be subsidized by ALL ratepayers, including those who don't drive at all, and ruining the free market for charging stations.

http://www.pge.com/en/about/newsroom/newsdetails/index.page?title=20150209_pge_proposes_major_build-out_of_electric_vehicle_charging_stations

http://www.utilitydive.com/news/how-sdge-wants-to-power-the-electric-vehicle-market/315887/
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jan 14, 2016 - 07:35pm PT
JE wrote:
"4. The automobile is the most fuel-efficient enclosed powered vehicle for a single occupant. No one disputes that public transportation is fuel efficient per passenger - when it's full. When it's not -- as in the case of, for example, many buses, subways, etc. outside of peak hours -- it is terribly fuel-inefficient."
"5. The owner of an automobile still has the option of using public transit when desired. If desired, the automobile owner can still use a bus, train or car pool. It's up to the owner."

As August wrote, you don't get the choice in most places. Smart growth and public transit are afterthoughts.

We readily complain about the cost of public transit, yet most are unwilling to admit that any road without full cost tolls is a massive subsidized incentive to single car sprawl.
Fuel efficiency is not the only measure. How about the cost of highway patrol, drunk drivers, land use, pollution, etc. How about the cost of the additional miles driven because sprawl externalizes costs? We have spent trillions of military dollars pursuing foreign oil.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:13pm PT
From CNN http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/14/politics/republican-debate-2016-live-updates/
Top candidates discussed overall during the debate on Facebook
1. Donald Trump
2. Ted Cruz
3. Marco Rubio
4. Ben Carson
5. Chris Christie
John Kasich and Jeb Bush were almost non-factors.

So------- Although some folks, who keep track of political posts on ST have me pegged as a liberal, I am currently registered as a Republican, and voted Republican in many presidential races until 1992, when I reluctantly concluded that I wasn’t stupid enough to keep voting for Republican Presidential candidates.

I was going to vote for John McCain, until he brought Sarah Palin on board.

I think of myself as a member of a now almost extinct group, a “liberal-Republican.”

Tonight, I was as usual, impressed by the intelligence of John Kasich, and I liked most of what Jeb Bush had to spew.

Ben Carson was unimpressive & way to cerebral for Republicans to embrace.

Chris Christie seemed to be a 1960’s politician that was somehow time-warped forward to present times. (which may be what the Republican base wants?)

Marco Rubio got ripped by Cruz for being soft on immigration and in return ripped Cruz for voting against a Defense budget bill, and emerged as a blood-drenched victor. (Which the Republican base might like?)

Cruz, kept reminding us of a sad blood-hound, and although he did some great spewing, did nothing to win us over.

Trump. My only major thoughts on his spewing tonight, are that he never backs down, and maybe a Trump-Kasich ticket could be what happens for the Republicans.

Spew on!

I do want to add that the overwhelming theme of the Republican candidates is that America is in great danger from Isis, times are tough, and that we should all be very afraid-----until one of them is elected president.

crusher

climber
Santa Monica, CA
Jan 14, 2016 - 09:35pm PT
Fritz you are generous. I am sorry for you and the country as a whole that your party has been hijacked by such nut jobs. Kasich is the only one who sounded somewhat lucid and as if he's living on planet earth today with the rest of us.

Debate just more fear mongering and lies, platitudes and really misleading comments meant for the ignorant and misinformed. Especially entertaining was Donald and Ted's cat fight about, what?! A Republican birther issue - how rich is that?!

Winemaker ++++
nah000

climber
no/w/here
Jan 14, 2016 - 10:05pm PT
watched a good chunk of the republican debate...

wow.

from the parts i watched it seemed like at least 50-70% of the conversation by both the moderators and the other candidates was either a direct or indirect response to what trump has said in the past or during the debate... the only one, other than trump, who seemed like he wasn't primarily just a reaction and had actual leadership charisma was surprisingly enough cruz...

very strange stuff, given how verifiably and objectively mistaken the world that trump verbally creates is relative to the one that can be shown to actually exist...

it's like watching a strange hostage situation where the hostage takers are a willfully misinformed populace and the hostages are anyone within the republican party who actually has a rationally functioning brain...

while it might be surficially great for the democrats to watch the republican party fall into dead end emotionally pandering reactionism [they're actually seriously debating whether to ban all muslim immigrants/visitors?!? they're actually seriously debating threatening large >20% tarrifs being placed on china?!?!] having one party trend towards a leader that is nothing more than a third world style strong man fascistic act making empty and bellicose promises completely detached from any possible objective reality is, in the long run, not healthy for a country that only has two parties...

so again i'll just leave with what i started with:

wow.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 04:34am PT
I'm curious to understand if all the chatter, banter, vehemence, angst and posturing about the next presidential election is because people truly believe in their heart that the choice of President going to have an impact on the direction of the country- In any meaningful way?

Stated another way: Do the people that engage in the deep discussions about candidates (pro and con) feel like the President is able to fix whatever problems you might see with our country?

I have revealed my bias previously in that I don't see it that way at all but I'm curious why others are so apparently convinced.

If its nothing more than something to talk about, that's cool too.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 15, 2016 - 04:43am PT
I can't watch those hideous Republican debates anymore.

The first step is admitting you have a problem.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 15, 2016 - 06:23am PT
FWIW...(spoiler alert: it ain't worth nothin')

I had been stating that Rubio is the most likely candidate to become the republican nominee.

I actually now think Trump is most likely their guy. His poll numbers just keep creeping upward, and it's getting late in the game. No one is even close. Cruz seems to have stalled and Rubio is stuck.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:36am PT
Escopeta: Long ago on ST a conservative poster named Lois liked to deeply, deeply, deeply engage and discuss beliefs & issues. She eventually got banned, despite having a few supporters here. I sure as hell was not one of them.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:57am PT

Stated another way: Do the people that engage in the deep discussions about candidates (pro and con) feel like the President is able to fix whatever problems you might see with our country?
.
I can't answer that question, but apparently the repub presidential candidates think they, and only they can fix any perceived problems.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 15, 2016 - 08:16am PT
I actually now think Trump is most likely their guy. His poll numbers just keep creeping upward

Very scary, especially considering the economy might be be taking a header. Recessions typically mean a party change at the White House.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jan 15, 2016 - 08:36am PT
A Trump nod = Hillary 2016!
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 15, 2016 - 08:43am PT
Actually, I think a Cruz nomination would give Hillary a larger win. Hard to find anyone other than evangelicals who will admit to liking him.
John Duffield

Mountain climber
New York
Jan 15, 2016 - 08:50am PT
Looks like Trump Sanders now. Both of them are improving rapidly and their trajectory is up.

Sanders especially. A couple of months ago, he simply looked like an angry old man. Now, he's hitting his stride. Smiling. Confident. My Democratic friends are happy again.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 15, 2016 - 09:08am PT
I prefer Hillary but will happily vote for Bernie. Anyone beats the horrible crop of angry nuts the GOP has offered.

I agree that Trump will be the nominee.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 15, 2016 - 09:18am PT
I think there is a lot of wishful thinking regarding Sanders' chances.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 09:36am PT
I kept my Insurance plan, I kept my Doctor
so calling Obama a liar is a LIE

Craig, I know you know logic better than that, so the obvious non-sequitur disappoints me.

Markets do a great job for some things. But it is simply not true that a series of individual choices, that all look reasonable to the individual, always produces the best outcome for the group.

I would prefer to live in a city that has a Paris or London style underground. SF has decent public transportation but getting around inside of they city is mostly buses and surface Muni (Bart mainly gets you in and out of the city). So even taking public transportation is just as a slow as a car. Whereas far more of London or Paris is served underground which doesn't suffer from auto congestion. The free market is not going to create this. Just as GM and the free market didn't build our interstate highway system.

August, this argument seems to be blaming the market for failing to give you your preferred mode of transportation. Just because you would prefer living in an urban environment that can support a rapid subway system does not mean that most others would so choose. Unless we "pack 'em in," such a subway system is wildly inefficient and unaffordable. Based on the observed behavior of American consumers, there are not enough that want to be packed in.

No one is saying that government has no role in transportation. What I am saying is that the prevelance of private automobiles reflects rational thought by consumers, given their preferences.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 10:49am PT
The norcal socal bullet train is monumentally stupid. The people who support it do so with other peoples money. Idiots.

I love riding trains, and Fresno would benefit from this, but it is a monumental waste of money. What I find sad, DMT, is that they only think they're supporting it with other people's money. In fact, they're supporting it with our money, that could be put to much better use if, for instance, the state spent it to lower the cost and raise the quality of its system of public higher education.

John
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 10:54am PT
Escopeta: Long ago on ST a conservative poster named Lois liked to deeply, deeply, deeply engage and discuss beliefs & issues. She eventually got banned, despite having a few supporters here. I sure as hell was not one of them.

Thanks Fritz for the context. Does that mean that there should be no real expectation of engaging on beliefs and issues? Particularly if you aren't part of the "Sh@t Show Libtard Drum Circle" as one poster so frankly put it? (a sentiment that's starting to resonate even without the typical idiotic responses)?

Or should I infer that conservatives automatically get banned (which actually might explain a lot) or did this Lois person earn it?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 10:55am PT
The norcal socal bullet train is monumentally stupid. The people who support it do so with other peoples money. Idiots.

DMT

I have long wondered why there isn't a bullet from LA to Vegas. Seems like the perfect opportunity and would take minimal investment of public funds/resources.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:05am PT
Or should I infer that conservatives automatically get banned (which actually might explain a lot) or did this Lois person earn it?

No, conservatives do not automatically get banned. We're just scarce because of the demographics of who posts on this sort of forum.

I was never clear about what Lois did to get banned, other than annoy people because she was not a climber, and posted opinions that vexed the leftist herd. This is, after all, a climbers' forum, even if it's not exclusively a climbing forum.

Most banning results from disrespectful ad hominem attacks or proliferation of SPAM, vulgarity, or other conduct sufficiently outside the norm that it fits the Potter Stewart definition of pornography: "I know it when I see it."

As for the sniping at you for Loisizing, take it for what they say: you're expressing a contrary opinion.

John
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:16am PT
Donald did a great job last night..

Carson is out the door..

Rubio just needs more time not this election maybe next..



Escopeta ull get banned it happens to the best of us!

Liberals heads are GUNNABLOW!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:18am PT
JEl...

Roger. Appreciate it.
MikeL

Social climber
Seattle, WA
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:30am PT
Another ad hominem.
John M

climber
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:38am PT
the final nail in Lois coffin was her attack of a person on the AA thread. way out of line.

But she was previously banned for basically spamming every thread she entered. Dr. F, a liberal, was also banned for this. Plus personal attacks.

So don't spam the forum with overload so that you dominate too many threads. Its about balance.

Annoying too many people here can get you banned. when threads become about you, then its time to dial it back. Its not that hard. Take your ego out of it. I suppose that is difficult for people. It took me awhile to figure that one out and I still work on it.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:43am PT
Thanks, John M. I wasn't aware of the final Lois issue. You are right -- almost all banning occurs when a thread degenerates into personal attacks by a couple of posters going back and forth against each other -- usually with the intellectual rigor of six-year-olds arguing in a playground. This turns the thread from its topic to one about its posters.

I believe at least one poster (Dave Kos) got the chop (On ST. Thankfully not in life) after starting a thread calling out another poster. If one follows your advice, there should be no problem.

John
John M

climber
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:49am PT
when threads become about you, then its time to dial it back

my own words kind of tickled me. Does this mean we have to ban the people who have appreciation threads? heh heh..
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:21pm PT
Did you keep your Doctor and Insurance or not John?
Yes or No?

You never answering questions that reveal you as a hypocrite disappoints me,
avoidance is not a part of being truthful

On another point, which Republican Candidate is more truthful than Hillary?

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:25pm PT
Dr. F, a liberal, was also banned for this. Plus personal attacks.

WRONG
I was banned for asking Admin to Ban The Chief, who was personally attacking everyone.

What personal attacks did I post?

Lois drove everyone mad with her extreme GOP loyalty and right wing judgmental attitude. Like Ann Coulter, just a awful person to debate against.

Getting banned is a difficult process, unless you screw the wrong person at the wrong time.
Complaints about Lois and the Chief went on for years before anything was done, the sh#t show would just go on day after day.
Pages of attacks would happen on a daily occurrence, the good guys attacking back, how else can you topple someone bad, ignore? wrong, you have to attack Hitler, Stalin, any sick troll that wants to dominate.

We would all hope for the axe to fall but it would never happen until major damage had already occurred and people left ST rather than put up with the bad posters.

I would predict, The Chief drove off more posters than anyone else.
He was a sick soul that should never be allowed an audience.


Now new posters get banned because someone thinks they might be Lois in disguise, which is sad.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:42pm PT
Craig, whether you or I keep our doctors (I did, though at greater cost) or plan (I did not, because of greater cost) doesn't make Obama's lie true. "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan" was demonstrably false, because a great many plans were no longer available under the terms of the ACA, and this fact was known to Obama and the administration when he made the statement to the contrary.

Which Republican candidate is more truthful than Hillary? Which candidate, Republican or Democrat, is not more truthful than Hillary? The movement in favor of Bernie demonstrates, in my opinion, the recognition of Democrats that Hillary simply is not trustworthy. Her stonewalling -- a trait she shares with the current administration -- about what was on her private email server is just one piece of evidence of what has been a pattern of misinformation and deceit. She and her super-PAC, disguised as the MSM, can pretend the problems don't exist, but an increasing part of the American public sees the contrary evidence.

Some of what she says can't be taken seriously in any case. She and Bill were dead broke when they left the White House? Monica Lewinsky's allegations were just the conjuring of a vast, right-wing conspiracy? Sending emails to the Egyptian government and Chelsea that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist action while telling the American public and, particularly, the families of those killed that the attack was a spontaneous result of offense taken from an obscure video represents an honest mistake in the fog of events?

All of these lies, together with her demonstrated tendency to break rules when it suits her, don't speak well for the value she places on integrity.

John
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:51pm PT
and this fact was known to Obama and the administration when he made the statement to the contrary.

How can you possibly know what was known to the President at any point in time.

Please justify that statement.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:57pm PT
Almost everyone of those points against Hillary are pure Republican led witch hunts that have no merit on truthful honesty

How would you like someone to go through your legal e-mail server looking for any thing that they can use to bash you with.

AND they found zero that they can use against her except an e-mail to Chelsea, which was meaningless, since "What does it matter if it was the video or a terrorist attack"
since it was the Video that spurred on the Terrorist attack, she was correct, it doesn't matter what you call it.

The talking points were given to the Admin by the CIA, were they supposed to say something other than what the CIA said??
It's pretty lame to say that she should have.

EVERY Single SOS used a private e-mail server until Kerry started his service. Bush II used the Karl Rove GOP server, then Rove erased 3 million e-mails when asked by Congress to see them. I want to see them...
Are we allowed to look at Condi's e-mails?
why not?

And every Republican is caught up in a web of lies about trickle down economics, climate change, Christianity, guns, who their campaign donors are. Every word out of their mouth is part of their misinformation campaign.

So I say you're wrong John
Every Republican candidate is a sick liar, Hillary is basically honest but has a billion dollar smear campaign running against her to make her look like a terrible person. It's truly a sick way to run a party, tear down the competition through lies, smears and misinformation all because the Republicans have nothing truthful to offer America that is good.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 12:58pm PT
For starters, Ken:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/11/07/white-house-website-at-odds-with-latest-obama-statement.html

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/10/29/brutal-the-if-you-like-your-plan-you-can-keep-your-plan-compilation-clip/

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2013/11/03/incomplete-wsj-report-notes-policy-advisers-overruled-political-aides-ob

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/31/obama-officials-in-2010-93-million-americans-will-be-unable-to-keep-their-health-plans-under-obamacare/

John

Edit: After seeing Craig's reply, above, he'll say that these are enemies of Hillary, so don't listen to what they say. Each article cites facts, but I guess delusion still has its place. In any case, you ask "how can one know?" The answer is quite simple: the terms of the law made certain existing plans no longer permitted.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 01:06pm PT
So you kept your Doctor and Insurance Plan
You just had to pay more, but you have no reference of what you would had to pay w/o the ADA.
Some people had to change plans because they weren't offered anymore,
Big deal, so Obama said something Not completely true, but mostly true, information changes all the time, you say one thing one day, and the next day things have changed so it's no longer applicable, That is Not a LIE.

So your remarks fall short of proving anything
and the remarks about Obama lying are untrue, and most of those accusations against Hillary have been proven to be incorrect.

But a bunch of bloggers out to smear Obama say he lied, They lie about everything, so who to trust?

How about that Republican Health Care Plan
Will it save you money?

Why won't the Republicans just help to fix the ADA and put in cost controls?
Why? because they want it to fail and to piss people off, they want America to SUFFER for petty politics, nothing more.

People are starving, getting paid low wages, millions of jobs sent overseas, millions in poverty, millions w/o proper Healthcare due to it's expense, yet our Republican leaders sit on their hands and will do nothing just for political points.
Here is their strategy, Make the Entire Country Suffer, and hopefully the people will be so stupid and blame the Dems, and hopefully forget that the republicans caused the problem in the first place, and reelect Republicans.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 15, 2016 - 01:17pm PT
John,

Not one of those links demonstrates what the President actually knows, which you say that you know.

He can be wrong, but not knowing something and being wrong about it is not the same as telling a lie.....as you know.

Being told something wrong in an area in which you have no particular expertise, then repeating it is not telling a lie.....as you know.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 01:20pm PT
Ken, Obama is a lawyer with the very best of credentials. Saying he didn't know that he wasn't telling the truth in this situation is a little like saying an experienced climber really expected 550 parachute cord to hold a factor two leader fall. It stretches credibility beyond the breaking point.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 01:29pm PT
The ADA was designed so you would keep your doctor and plan
but the insurance Companies DROPPED the Plans

So Obama DID not lie, changes occurred beyond Obama's control,
and you could buy a new better plan using the SAME Insurance Company
and you will use the Same Doctor

So this whole lying thing is a manufactured Smear campaign against Obama, nothing more

Yet all these Misinformed Republicans will shove it down our throats over and over again and look like complete idiots for posting their despicable propaganda.


At Least Hillary admits that she misspoke about some things, like being broke when she left the Whitehouse, she said she regrets saying that, she says she was wrong about sniper fire, she is honest enough to say she was wrong or misspoke.

No Republican will say they were wrong about anything, where is Bush's apology for Iraq? for cratering the economy? for stacking the supreme court with fascists?

So the contrast is stark, being responsible for what you say, or just being a hard nosed a-hole that will never back down when proven wrong or lying.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 01:56pm PT
I'm sure the Republican brand of government-provided health care would be sooo much better. Good Grief.

Why is no one asking the question of whether we should be looking to Big Daddy .Gov to provide us with healthcare?

Some of the people on here have their panties all in a wad about something so personal as the choice of a Doctor and then turn around and advocate that the government restrict something like gay marriage?

How about we get gov't completely out of the marriage business AND the healthcare business.

As offensive as some people view Gay Marriage or Obamacare, I view with the same level of disdain the fact that we are even having the discussion.

We have become so conditioned that we will fight each other over allowing or not allowing the government to recognize or provide something that is totally not up to them to even have a stake in in the first place!

This is exactly what our current elected official base wants, we've already conceded the power to them to make one or the other legal, now its just people fighting over the ideology of the thing.

Make no mistake, the government doesn't care who gets married to who, or whether you like the Republican or Democrat brand of healthcare, they are ONLY concerned that they maintain the power to choose it for you.

The more you fight over one or the other, the more you actually concede your rights as a citizen.

If you don't agree with the ideology of Gay Marriage, fine. If you do, that's cool too! If you want to help people with their Healthcare, by all means be my guest.

But don't use the government as your tool to inflict whatever your brand of morality is on the rest of the supposedly free population.

All you're doing is giving up more power to the people who DO NOT share in your disgust.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:10pm PT
We fight about Government in HealthCare because we are paying WAY, and the Republicans will not allow a Public Option for Medicare, and they want to gut Medicare.

The Republican meddling allows the Private insurance Companies no real completion, and obscene billions in profits at our expense.

We would pay 3 times less for single payer
We are being fleeced by the Republicans that are in bed with the Private Insurance Companies so they can get their bribes
it's all about making big money for their cronies when it comes to Republican policies
It's a sick and twister Political world we live in



The more you fight over one or the other, the more you actually concede your rights as a citizen
What rights am I conceding as a citizen?
None. we have to fight for OUR Rights, because they will be taken away by the Republicans if we allow them to do what they want.

You have to fight
Democracy takes work
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:21pm PT
Marriage is a contract with the State that offers married couples special privileges.
So the Gov. plays a role

A Gov. that restricts marriage and other rights because of religious beliefs is not a secular Democracy, it's theocracy.
I found your rant to be full of holes, just more anti-government ravings based on a misunderstanding of the important role Gov. plays in our lives
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:30pm PT
Craig Fry. You are fighting the wrong battle.

And for the record, Marriage isn't a contract with the State. Its a contract with another person.

Rather than fight about what the government will or won't recognize, how about we fight to remove all the financial incentives and penalties that the government has saddled the institution of marriage with?

And then what will you have? Two free people conducting their life how they see fit without needless government intrusion. Sounds awful nice to me.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:39pm PT
Ken, Obama is a lawyer with the very best of credentials. Saying he didn't know that he wasn't telling the truth in this situation is a little like saying an experienced climber really expected 550 parachute cord to hold a factor two leader fall. It stretches credibility beyond the breaking point.

John

I appreciate that you think that being an attorney means that one is a world expert in every subject under the sun.

It ain't so.

It also isn't so that an attorney who specializes in healthcare issues, is automatically an expert in healthcare issues. Don't let them operate on you!

To use your absurd analogy, it would be like an attorney who never climbed anything, opining on the sufficiency of a rope for a factor 2 fall. No need to bother with ACTUAL experts.

I suppose you'd have such an attorney come in and supervise the rigging on a El Cap climb.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:40pm PT
And for the record, Marriage isn't a contract with the State. Its a contract with another person.
WTF?
Wrong, 2 people don't need a contract to be together
But you do have to get a marriage license from the State to get any special privileges.

You can have your fight, I will pick mine
and I don't need anyone telling me I'm fighting the wrong fight

and I don't understand what your getting at, other than saying we should all bury our head in the sand
which I will never abide with, I will fight, I will study, I will debate, I will vote against all Right Wingers and libertarians, I will inform

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:43pm PT
I found your rant to be full of holes, just more anti-government ravings based on a misunderstanding of the important role Gov. plays in our lives

My "Rant" is Pro-Freedom. Not Anti-Government. Both can exist. But it requires the recognition from people like yourself that you have been duped into fighting for further relinquishing of your rights and you don't realize it because you are so caught up in the Republican vs Democrat battle.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:46pm PT
explain this Freedom
and I will explain how you are delusional

The freedom you want is a delusion,
There will be no freedom w/o a strong Gov. to give you that Freedom
No one lives in a bubble, we are all in this together

e pluribus Unum

Typical Libertarianism
I want freedom from the Gov. that gives me all the stuff I need to live my life. The Roads, money, telephone, internet, safety, hospitals, education, clean air and water, I will take all their free handouts that let me live my freedom, and I refuse to pay for it.

Like a cat that thinks he is living the good life, completely independent, completely free, and as long as that mysterious free bowl of Gov. food appears every morning, the cat lives in his delusion of freedom.



are you free if you are starving?
are you free if you can't pay your bills?
are you free if you don't have a home to live in?
are you free if can't get married because you love someone of the same sex?
No

You have to have your basic needs met before any freedom can exist.
And the Gov. should be the last resort to make sure you have your basic needs met so you can be free.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 02:57pm PT
Let's say your loving wife to be has blue eyes. She's gorgeous and you want to get married.

And you know what, marriage is cool. Ever since the new president you get all these tax breaks and a special plaque from El Presidente and a free honeymoon all expenses paid.

Oops. You know what, the government passed legislation yesterday that people with Blue Eyes can't get married. No marriage license for you and no free honeymoon. And since you already said that two people need the government license to be married, you're screwed.


Moral of the story: As some people have recently found out... If you use the government to carry out your own brand of morality, don't get butt hurt when you get beat at your own game. I propose we just stop playing. If you take away all the BS that goes with marriage, then what is it? Just two people together.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:02pm PT
Very poor analogy
and yes, the Republicans may restrict your freedom by making certain people unable to marry
So it is a Democratic vs. Republican fight
freedom and rights have to be fought for, because the Republicans will restrict them

like mixed races
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:03pm PT
And some other future party might restrict your ability to marry people with blue eyes.

Why not remove the risk altogether?
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:09pm PT
August, this argument seems to be blaming the market for failing to give you your preferred mode of transportation. Just because you would prefer living in an urban environment that can support a rapid subway system does not mean that most others would so choose.

No one is saying that government has no role in transportation. What I am saying is that the prevelance of private automobiles reflects rational thought by consumers, given their preferences.

I absolutely am blaming the market for not giving me my preferred mode of transportantion. No, I take that back. I'm blaming the government because I realize this is something that the free market cannot provide.

What I am saying is the rational consumer choice doesn't always get good results. Tragedy of the commons: it makes sense for animal factory farms to pump their animals full of anti-biotics because they get less sick and put weight on faster. It causes resistance and everyone loses but one owner can't do anything about that.

Yea, I realize I am minority here. But in your first comment way back, if I recall correctly, the gist was that public transportation shouldn't be pushed by the government because we all loved cars. My response: if the government spent money on high speed rail (instead of 8 lane freeways), had zoning laws that created higher urban densities, put money into high quality subways, we could end up with a system that, even though it would obviously have trade-offs, would be better than our car culture.

Just because in the absense of such a policy we end up with a bunch of individual consumers all choosing to buy cars, doesn't make that a better outcome for the group. The only way to get there is to push government to push this policy.

So I think in a democracy it is perfectly reasonable to fight to make the government give me a transportation alternative that the free market can't provide.

Should our interstate highway system have been left up to the freemarket?

Should SF Bart our the New York subway have been left up to the freemarket?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:23pm PT
August,

One viable argument states that if the government hadn't meddled in the development of our transportation system way back when...the rail system would still carry the majority of our cargo and the free market may well have provided all those things you desire rather than trying to keep an interstate system up and running to accommodate 3-by tractor trailers carrying cargo across country in the most inefficient way possible.

If good old Mr Goodyear hadn't contributed to the right campaign, we might be a nation of bullet trains and subways. We will never know what the free market can provide, unless we provide a free market
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:26pm PT
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/?page=4

Pretty much everything Trump says is wrong
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jan 15, 2016 - 03:54pm PT
Escopeta, the railroads could not carry anything without governmental involvement, because they would never be able to acquire the required right-of-way in private transactions. Acquisition of transportation rights of way, whether for transportation of electricity, freight or people runs into intractable monopoly problems if the carrier must rely solely in market transactions unaided by governmental intervention.

And Ken, I'm still having real trouble with your argument. I assume I'm misunderstanding you, because your argument seems to be that I can't know the POTUS lied because I can't possibly know what he did or did not know when he said "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." If that's the argument, then we might as well strike "lie" from the vocabulary, because we can't possibly know what anyone else knows when they speak. Accordingly, I must be misunderstanding your argument.

My argument remains that that the basic requirements of ACA-compliant plans were a major issue in the legislation. If Obama didn't know that at least some existing plans would not qualify under ACA, he'd have to be dumber than a rock, and we both know that's not true (if we can discern truth. See previous paragraph). There were - and remain - major political battles over what ACA-compliant plans were required to cover (see, e.g., U.S. v. Little Sisters of the Poor). If all existing plans would remain compliant, why all the wrangling?

The evidence, particularly in the Forbes article, is incontrovertible that he knew perfectly well that millions of current plans were non-compliant under the ACA, but still said otherwise. That is, unless you're saying he couldn't possibly know that at least out person out of several million would want to keep a non-compliant plan. That argument doesn't pass the straight-face test.

So again, can you explain your argument in a way that meets my concerns?

Thanks.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 04:05pm PT
The point is:
What Obama said about keeping your doctor and plan shouldn't be used as a smear campaign that Obama Lied like you did John
Because we kept our Doctors, and we Kept our Insurance, the plan may have changed a little
others had different experiences, so it was true to some extent.

and using this a lie compared to the Bush WMD in Iraq lie,
you lost all perspective when it comes to lies

EVERY Republican in office says Climate Change is Hoax, that trickle down works, that rasing the minimum wage will hurt the economy, that we are a Christian nation, that we should have prayer in school, will make abortion illegal, will cut education funding, take rights away from LGBT and immigrants, throw more people in jail, start new wars, make health care insurance more expensive, will give more land away to foreign interests, sell off our, forests etc
They don't have anything good to offer, not a damn thing
instead they just pander about how bad things are, and how they will just sprinkle their magic dust and fix everything if we elect them

They live in a web of lies

There is no comparison between the lies Hillary and Obama have been pummeled over
Perspective

I fear that few truths can pass your straight face criteria
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 06:06pm PT
The way I look at is this. If he wasn't straight up lying when he said it then that's an indication that he was so far out of touch of the reality of the proposal that he actually thought it was true.

I'm not sure which I would prefer.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 06:25pm PT
The way I look at is this. If Bush wasn't straight up lying when he said that we need to invade Iraq then that's an indication that he was so far out of touch of the reality of the proposal that he actually thought it was true.

I do know what I prefer
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 15, 2016 - 06:44pm PT


Two Smoking Guns: FBI on Hillary’s Case
By Andrew P. Napolitano

January 15, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - The federal criminal investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s failure to secure state secrets was ratcheted up earlier this week, and at the same time, the existence of a parallel criminal investigation of another aspect of her behavior was made known. This is the second publicly revealed expansion of the FBI’s investigations in two months.

I have argued for two months that Clinton’s legal woes are either grave or worse than grave. That argument has been based on the hard, now public evidence of her failure to safeguard national security secrets and the known manner in which the Department of Justice addresses these failures.

The failure to safeguard state secrets is an area of the law in which the federal government has been aggressive to the point of being merciless. State secrets are the product of members of the intelligence community’s risking their lives to obtain information.

Before she was entrusted with any state secrets – indeed, on her first full day as secretary of state – Clinton received instruction from FBI agents on how to safeguard them; and she signed an oath swearing to comply with the laws commanding the safekeeping of these secrets. She was warned that the failure to safeguard secrets – known as espionage – would most likely result in aggressive prosecution.

In the cases of others, those threats have been carried out. The Obama Department of Justice prosecuted a young sailor for espionage for sending a selfie to his girlfriend, because in the background of the photo was a view of a sonar screen on a submarine. It prosecuted a heroic Marine for espionage for warning his superiors of the presence of an al-Qaida operative in police garb inside an American encampment in Afghanistan, because he used a Gmail account to send the warning.

It also prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus for espionage for keeping secret and top-secret documents in an unlocked drawer in his desk inside his guarded home. It alleged that he shared those secrets with a friend who also had a security clearance, but it dropped those charges.

The obligation of those to whom state secrets have been entrusted to safeguard them is a rare area in which federal criminal prosecutions can be based on the defendant’s negligence. Stated differently, to prosecute Clinton for espionage, the government need not prove that she intended to expose the secrets.

The evidence of Clinton’s negligence is overwhelming. The FBI now has more than 1,300 protected emails that she received on her insecure server and sent to others – some to their insecure servers. These emails contained confidential, secret or top-secret information, the negligent exposure of which is a criminal act.

One of the top-secret emails she received and forwarded contained a photo taken from an American satellite of the North Korean nuclear facility that detonated a device just last week. Because Clinton failed to safeguard that email, she exposed to hackers and thus to the North Koreans the time, place and manner of American surveillance of them. This type of data is in the highest category of protected secrets.

Last weekend, the State Department released two smoking guns – each an email from Clinton to a State Department subordinate. One instructed a subordinate who was having difficulty getting a document to Clinton that she had not seen by using a secure State Department fax machine to use an insecure fax machine. The other instructed another subordinate to remove the "confidential" or "secret" designation from a document Clinton had not seen before sending it to her. These two emails show a pattern of behavior utterly heedless of the profound responsibilities of the secretary of state, repugnant to her sworn agreement to safeguard state secrets, and criminal at their essence.

Also this past weekend, my Fox News colleagues Katherine Herridge and Pamela Browne learned from government sources that the FBI is investigating whether Clinton made any decisions as secretary of state to benefit her family foundation or her husband’s speaking engagements. If so, this would be profound public corruption.

This investigation was probably provoked by several teams of independent researchers – some of whom are financial experts and have published their work – who have been investigating the Clinton Foundation for a few years. They have amassed a treasure-trove of documents demonstrating fraud and irregularities in fundraising and expenditures, and they have shown a pattern of favorable State Department treatment of foreign entities coinciding with donations by those entities to the Clinton Foundation and their engaging former President Bill Clinton to give speeches.

There are now more than 100 FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton. Her denial that she is at the core of their work is political claptrap with no connection to reality. It is inconceivable that the FBI would send such vast resources in the present dangerous era on a wild-goose chase.

It is the consensus of many of us who monitor government behavior that the FBI will recommend indictment. That recommendation will go to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who, given Clinton’s former status in the government and current status in the Democratic Party, will no doubt consult the White House.

If a federal grand jury were to indict Clinton for espionage or corruption, that would be fatal to her political career.

If the FBI recommends indictment and the attorney general declines to do so, expect Saturday Night Massacre-like leaks of draft indictments, whistleblower revelations and litigation, and FBI resignations, led by the fiercely independent and intellectually honest FBI Director James Comey himself.

That would be fatal to Clinton’s political career, as well.

Andrew Peter Napolitano is a syndicated columnist whose work appears in numerous publications, such as Fox News, The Washington Times, and Reason.

COPYRIGHT 2016 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:01pm PT
FOX News
so we have to assume that it's pure BS
which is a shame, since we have to assume all right wing media is now nothing more than propaganda or some other misinformation campaign


Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:05pm PT
Why do you limit your skepticism to right wing media outlets?
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:10pm PT
Why not..?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:23pm PT
I'm a member of the Skeptic Society
The Skeptics put what science has proven as the truth
The Republicans are the antithesis of everything the Skeptical Society stands for.

THEY ARE the source of the anti-scientific propaganda
They create it, they own it, they promote more smoking, burning more FFs, paying more for health care, all the while telling you that the Gov. is the problem
The Republicans, the right wing extremists, the right wing religious extremists be it Christian or it any religion, and the gun nuts, they are all in the same camp.

You need to be skeptical of everything they say, since it goes against almost all scientific evidence.

The trickle down economics that they say will improve the economy has been scientifically proven to be pure BS. yet they keep saying it is the only way to prosperity. It's a proven lie! They won't acknowledge the truth but instead promote lies over and over again, as if the truth.
That's pure evil in my book of morals
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:23pm PT
Lezarian..Don't over think it..The middle class ( you ) are going to keep getting taxed to subsidize the wealthy..Quit voting Republican if you want this to stop..
Norton

Social climber
Jan 15, 2016 - 07:45pm PT
Quit voting Republican if you want this to stop..

Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Jan 15, 2016 - 08:26pm PT
"Quit voting Republican if you want this to stop.. "

That is roughly true on a federal level,
but on the Cali state/county/city level, the public employee "unions" have bought the Democrat government and will screw over everyone else to get their outrageous benefits.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Firefighter-Overtime-Payments-Spark-Look-at-Staffing-Issues-364933531.html

http://www.hjta.org/california-commentary/uc-pension-crisis-creates-teachable-moment/

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/uniontrib/20040911/news_1n11chp.html

http://www.dailynews.com/opinion/20140204/chp-officers-retiring-in-greater-numbers-than-calpers-projected-daniel-borenstein

http://www.metnews.com/articles/2013/beck122713.htm

http://calcoastnews.com/2012/12/chp-chief-was-making-nearly-500000-before-retiring/
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Jan 15, 2016 - 09:49pm PT
splater...no arguements with you on the calpers benefits being too generous and unsustainable..but i wouldn't throw all the calpers workers into that category...
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:16pm PT
Name the most recent Republican accomplishment. Try.

Can't, right?

Without a vehicle (candidate, current office holder) to get anything done all your arguments are worthless. You Republicans are about to nominate Trump. Donald J. Trump.

Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:20pm PT
Name the most recent Republican accomplishment. Try.

They passed a bipartisan budget?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1314
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 15, 2016 - 11:23pm PT
Sorta. And then their frontrunner, Trump, said they "threw in the towel".
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 16, 2016 - 12:41am PT
The State of the Nation: A Dictatorship Without Tears
By John W. Whitehead
January 12, 2016

“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”—Aldous Huxley

There’s a man who contacts me several times a week to disagree with my assessments of the American police state. According to this self-avowed Pollyanna who is tired of hearing “bad news,” the country is doing just fine, the government’s intentions are honorable, anyone in authority should be blindly obeyed, those individuals who are being arrested, shot and imprisoned must have done something to deserve such treatment, and if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn’t care whether the government is spying on you.

In other words, this man trusts the government with his life, his loved ones and his property, and anyone who doesn’t feel the same should move elsewhere.

It’s tempting to write this man off as dangerously deluded, treacherously naïve, and clueless to the point of civic incompetence. However, he is not alone in his goose-stepping, comfort-loving, TV-watching, insulated-from-reality devotion to the alternate universe constructed for us by the Corporate State with its government propaganda, pseudo-patriotism and contrived political divisions.

While only 1 in 5 Americans claim to trust the government to do what is right, the majority of the people are not quite ready to ditch the American experiment in liberty. Or at least they’re not quite ready to ditch the government with which they have been saddled.

As The Washington Post concludes, “Americans hate government, but they like what it does.” Indeed, kvetching aside, Americans want the government to keep providing institutionalized comforts such as Social Security, public schools, and unemployment benefits, fighting alleged terrorists and illegal immigrants, defending the nation from domestic and foreign threats, and maintaining the national infrastructure. And it doesn’t matter that the government has shown itself to be corrupt, abusive, hostile to citizens who disagree, wasteful and unconcerned about the plight of the average American.

For the moment, Americans are continuing to play by the government’s rules. Indeed, Americans may not approve the jobs being done by their elected leaders, and they may have little to no access to those same representatives, but they remain committed to the political process, so much so that they are working themselves into a frenzy over the upcoming presidential election, with contributions to the various candidates nearing $500 million.

Yet as Barack Obama’s tenure in the White House shows, no matter how much hope and change were promised, what we’ve ended up with is not only more of the same, but something worse: an invasive, authoritarian surveillance state armed and ready to eliminate any opposition.

The state of our nation under Obama has become more bureaucratic, more debt-ridden, more violent, more militarized, more fascist, more lawless, more invasive, more corrupt, more untrustworthy, more mired in war, and more unresponsive to the wishes and needs of the electorate. Most of all, the government, already diabolical and manipulative to the nth degree, has mastered the art of “do what I say and not what I do” hypocrisy.

For example, the government’s arsenal is growing. While the Obama administration is working to limit the public’s access to guns by pushing for greater gun control, it’s doing little to scale back on the federal government’s growing arsenal of firepower and militarized equipment.

In fact, it’s not just the Department of Defense that’s in the business of waging war. Government agencies focused largely on domestic matters continue to spend tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to purchase SWAT and military-style equipment such as body armor, riot helmets and shields, cannon launchers and police firearms and ammunition. The Department of Veterans Affairs spent nearly $2 million on riot helmets, defender shields, body armor, a “milo return fire cannon system,” armored mobile shields, Kevlar blankets, tactical gear and equipment for crowd control. The Food and Drug Administration purchased “ballistic vests and carriers.” The Environmental Protection Agency shelled out $200,000 for body armor. And the Smithsonian Institution procured $28,000 worth of body armor for its “zoo police and security officers.”

The national debt is growing. In fact, it’s almost doubled during Obama’s time in office to nearly $20 trillion. Much of this debt is owed to foreign countries such as China, which have come to exert an undue degree of influence on various aspects of the American economy.

Meanwhile, almost half of Americans are struggling to save for emergencies and retirement, 43% can’t afford to go more than one month without a paycheck, and 24% have less than $250 in their bank accounts preceding payday.

On any given night, over half a million people in the U.S. are homeless, and half of them are elderly. In fact, studies indicate that the homeless are aging faster than the general population in the U.S.

While the U.S. spends more on education than almost any other country, American schools rank 28th in the world, below much poorer countries such as the Czech Republic and Vietnam.

The American police state’s payroll is expanding. Despite the fact that violent crime is at a 40-year-low, there are more than 1.1 million persons employed on a full-time basis by state and local law enforcement in this country. That doesn’t include the more than 120,000 full-time officers on the federal payroll.

While crime is falling, the number of laws creating new crimes is growing at an alarming rate. Congress creates, on average, more than 50 new criminal laws each year. This adds up to more than 4,500 federal criminal laws and an even greater number of state laws.

The prison population is growing at an alarming rate. Owing largely to overcriminalization, the nation’s prison population has quadrupled since 1980 to 2.4 million, which breaks down to more than one out of every 100 American adults behind bars. According to The Washington Post, it costs $21,000 a year to keep someone in a minimum-security federal prison and $33,000 a year for a maximum-security federal prison. Those costs are expected to increase 30 percent by 2020. Translation: while the American taxpayer will be forced to shell out more money for its growing prison population, the private prison industry will be making a hefty profit.

The nation’s infrastructure—railroads, water pipelines, ports, dams, bridges, airports and roads—is rapidly deteriorating. An estimated $1.7 trillion will be needed by 2020 to improve surface transportation, but with vital funds being siphoned off by the military industrial complex, there’s little relief in sight.

The expense of those endless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will cost taxpayers $4 trillion to $6 trillion. That does not include the cost of military occupations and exercises elsewhere around the globe. Unfortunately, that’s money that is not being invested in America, nor is it being used to improve the lives of Americans.

Government incompetence, corruption and lack of accountability continue to result in the loss of vast amounts of money and weapons. A Reuters investigation revealed $8.5 trillion in “taxpayer money doled out by Congress to the Pentagon since 1996 that has never been accounted for.” Then there was the $500 million in Pentagon weapons, aircraft and equipment (small arms, ammunition, night-vision goggles, patrol boats, vehicles and other supplies) that the U.S. military somehow lost track of.

Rounding out the bad news, many Americans know little to nothing about their rights and the government. Only 31% can name all three branches of the U.S. government, while one in three says that the Bill of Rights guarantees the right to own your own home, while one in four thinks that it guarantees “equal pay for equal work.” One in 10 Americans (12%) says the Bill of Rights includes the right to own a pet.

If this brief catalogue of our national woes proves anything at all, it is that the American experiment in liberty has failed, and as political economist Lawrence Hunter warns, it is only a matter of time before people realize it. Writing for Forbes, Hunter notes:

The greatest fear of America’s Founding Fathers has been realized: The U.S. Constitution has been unable to thwart the corrosive dynamics of majority-rule democracy, which in turn has mangled the Constitution beyond recognition. The real conclusion of the American Experiment is that democracy ultimately undermines liberty and leads to tyranny and oppression by elected leaders and judges, their cronies and unelected bureaucrats. All of this is done in the name of “the people” and the “general welfare,” of course. But in fact, democracy oppresses the very demos in whose name it operates, benefiting string-pullers within the Establishment and rewarding the political constituencies they manage by paying off special interests with everyone else’s money forcibly extracted through taxation. The Founding Fathers (especially Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, Madison, and James Monroe), as well as outside observers of the American Experiment such as Alexis de Tocqueville all feared democracy and dreaded this outcome. But, they let hope and faith in their ingenious constitutional engineering overcome their fear of the democratic state, only to discover they had replaced one tyranny with another.

So are there any real, workable solutions to the emerging American police state?

A second American Revolution will not work. In the first revolution, the colonists were able to dispatch the military occupation and take over the running of the country. However, the Orwellian state is here and it is so pervasive that government agents are watching, curtailing and putting down any resistance before it can get started.

A violent overthrow of the government will not work. Government agents are armed to the teeth and will easily blow away any insurgency when and if necessary.

Politics will not help things along. As history has made clear, the new boss is invariably the same as or worse than the old boss—all controlled by a monied, oligarchic elite.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, there is only one feasible solution left to us short of fleeing the country for parts unknown: grassroots activism that strives to reform the government locally and trickles up.

Unfortunately, such a solution requires activism, engagement, vigilance, sacrifice, individualism, community-building, nullification and a communal willingness to reject the federal government’s handouts and, when needed, respond with what Martin Luther King Jr. referred to as “militant nonviolent resistance.”

That means forgoing Monday night football in order to actively voice your concerns at city council meetings, turning off the television and spending an hour reading your local newspaper (if you still have one that reports local news) from front to back, showing your displeasure by picketing in front of government offices, risking your reputation by speaking up and disagreeing with the majority when necessary, refusing to meekly accept whatever the government dictates, reminding government officials—including law enforcement—that they work for you, and working together with your neighbors to present a united front against an overreaching government.

Unfortunately, we now live in a ubiquitous Orwellian society with all the trappings of Huxley’s A Brave New World. We have become a society of watchers rather than activists who are distracted by even the clumsiest government attempts at sleight-of-hand.

There are too many Americans who are reasonably content with the status quo and too few Americans willing to tolerate the discomfort of a smaller, more manageable government and a way of life that is less convenient, less entertaining, and less comfortable.

It well may be that Huxley was right, and that the final revolution is behind us. Certainly, most Americans seem to have learned to love their prison walls and take comfort in a dictatorship without tears.

John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and spokesperson, in addition to writing a weekly commentary that is posted on The Rutherford Institute’s website (www.rutherford.org)
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 03:28am PT
There are too many Americans who are reasonably content with the status quo and too few Americans willing to tolerate the discomfort of a smaller, more manageable government and a way of life that is less convenient, less entertaining, and less comfortable.

I would have changed this one sentence.

There are too many Americans who are reasonably content with the status quo and too few Americans willing to tolerate the discomfort of a smaller, more manageable government and in return a life more free than when they were born while also more dependent on their own decisions and not someone else's.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:13am PT
do you believe that there are NO Democrats involved in illegal/unethical political activities?
Yes there are many Dems involved in corruption and unethical behavior

But the Republicans have made it so money trumps all, now it's too easy to take the BIG money and promote conservative policies that favor Corps, the military, and are a disservice to the Democratic agenda of serving the people.


How will this ever change?
There is only one way, elect in a Progressive Democratic Congress and President that can change the laws to get the money out of politics,
and to put in Liberal Judges in the SCOTUS.

That's why I always harp on voting out the Republicans, they stand in the way of ANY real change for this Country.
We got to have Campaign Finance reform, The status quo is killing us

and then there is the fact that they are at war with the Dems and Obama,
and have blocked everything that could be helping our economy and creating jobs.

The Dems only had a 27 working day of 60 Liberal Senators, they were busy saving the economy at that time in 2009. So don't bother repeating the lie that the Dems had a majority for 2 years or whatever.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:23am PT
Excellent analysis, as usual, Craig.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:32am PT
Have you the people prospered under the last seven years of rule by majority in all branches of government, then after loss of majority in two branches by the chief executives dictates? Has the middle class wages increased, has your access to and affordability of healthcare improved, have your kids recieved a better education and more affordable college tuitions, has your security and respectful treatment of yourselves as murican's improved as you traveled abroad,.....?

The do nothing repubs had nothing to do with change in the conditions listed above-that's by your own admission. We're George Soro's, Tom Steyer, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, the Koch bros, and multinational conglomerates responsible for the perceived defective treatments of you the people?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:36am PT
rick
you have no real understanding of what's really going on
so why should I bother

but I repeat
the Dems only had 27 working days of a 60 vote majority in 2009
Only 2 policies were passed during that time, the stimulus with less than 60 votes, and ObamaCare with 60 votes
The Republicans filibustered everything after that
so NO Democratic Policies have been implemented

So we have weak Republican Economy, not a Democratic stimulated one
The Republicans are the ruling party Now, and for the past 6 1/2 years.
All the President can do is veto their bad legislation, he can't make laws or spend money

so you see, everything you said above was 100% wrong
and you learned this misinformation from the right wing media that wants you to believe lies so you will blame the Dems
and then you will be stupid enough to vote in the Repubs that caused all these problems in the first place

They are the cause of the high cost of health care, the debt, the money in politics, and basically every problem this country faces, not the Dems.

What Liberal Democratic Policy has hurt you or this Country in the past 30 years?
I can't think of one.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:47am PT
Didn't we get the 800 billion stimulus, GM-GOVERNMENT motors, ACA, continuing resolution after continuing resolution, huge expansions of green energy and associated loan losses, bailing out of numerous pension funds, increased funding of NGO's, hundreds of thousands of pages of new bureaucratic written regulations having the force of law and backed by heavily armed agencies, and more presidential decrees than any other prez in history. Hasn't the prez and dems spent more trillions of dollars of borrowed money than all other regimes combined before them to improve you the people's lot in life. Where did it all go-did the Koch bros steal it?

No Craig, I guess I really don't understand.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:49am PT
Most of the above is wrong
so yes, you are completely misinformed

and more presidential decrees than any other prez in history. Hasn't the prez and dems spent more trillions of dollars of borrowed money than all other regimes combined
100% wrong,
The Repubs put all those trillions on our debt
Bush II had way more decrees (and illegal ones to boot)

do you ever question the sh#t you hear?
dirtbag

climber
Jan 16, 2016 - 08:56am PT
Craig, the 800 bill stimulus creates 3 million jobs; the bailout (initiated by Bush and which I was initially skeptical) saved the industry, has been repaid in full to the us, allowed us to get fuel standard concessions; we are in the middle of a transformative green energy revolution.

Yadayadayada. You know this, I know this, deep down they know this. Do they care? NO.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 09:23am PT
NEWS ALERT

Escopeta is Not LEB
He is a climber, has climbing posts, and posts Mt. scences
here is one of his posts

http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=2744880&msg=2746019#msg2746019




Dirt, yes you are correct, more good stuff got through that first year when the economy was in free fall due to Republican policies

Yea Green Energy!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Jan 16, 2016 - 10:36am PT
Hey liberal friends.

He's back. Hope you all had a chance to catch Real Time with Bill Maher last night.
It was a great show and he had a birthday wish.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaChH0xuq1g

Ask President Obama to Appear on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher...

http://petitions.whitehouse.gov//petition/ask-president-obama-appear-hbos-real-time-bill-maher

Happy 60th Birthday Bill!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 10:58am PT
Escopeta, when the implanted microchip comes available to the masses, will you take one on?

I think I'll pass. Thanks.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 11:00am PT
NEWS ALERT

Escopeta is Not LEB

How was your nap Mr Van Winkle?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 16, 2016 - 11:06am PT
Didn't we get the 800 billion stimulus, GM-GOVERNMENT motors, ACA, continuing resolution after continuing resolution, huge expansions of green energy and associated loan losses, bailing out of numerous pension funds, increased funding of NGO's, hundreds of thousands of pages of new bureaucratic written regulations having the force of law and backed by heavily armed agencies, and more presidential decrees than any other prez in history. Hasn't the prez and dems spent more trillions of dollars of borrowed money than all other regimes combined before them to improve you the people's lot in life.


Uhhhh.....no.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 11:20am PT
Are you into Black Flag?

Been listening to the early stuff lately. While I enjoy the energy of Henry Rollins I actually liked the raw stuff with Dez a little better.

I'm a little fed up with the over-production and under-fidelity of today's music so its nice to return to music recorded with everybody standing int he same room for a change.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Jan 16, 2016 - 12:16pm PT
Rick, per your question/assertion upthread, which I have edited down to questions I can answer:

Have you the people prospered under the last seven years? Has the middle class wages increased, has your access to and affordability of healthcare improved, has your security and respectful treatment of yourselves as murican's improved as you traveled abroad,.....?

I retired this year, but the previous 7 years were the best earning years of my life, both in sales commissions for selling outdoor gear at wholesale & stock & bond earnings. Until I started Medicare, both Heidi & I kept our same Blue Cross HSA plans which always cost too damn much & had a $5,000.00 deductable. Yes, Medicare has been a pleasant surprise for the most part too. I do know two people that suffered cancer in their family before Obamacare, exceeded the max their insurance would pay & had to declare bankruptcy after spending everything on cancer treatments. That shist doesn't happen now to the insured.

I was in Nepal when Obama became president and the small merchants I talked with that day nearly had tears of happiness in their eyes that he had been elected & the evil Bush was gone. Since then we have visited Chile, Argentina, Switzerland, Spain, Holland, Germany, France, & Italy and have been very well treated, with the exception of a crazy man on a Swiss Train in 2009 that ripped on me for what George Bush did to the world.

It's obvious that you are very angry, but I'm very happy. From previous posts, it sounds like you have money, so I think it's your perception.

For an analogy: let's say we each have a half-full glass of the same wine. My perception is my glass is nearly full and tastes great. Your perception is, yours is nearly empty and tastes thin and sour.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jan 16, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
Empty, angry, come on Fritz. I have adult children and grandchildren I'm concerned for. Bush was a piece of work I grant you that, but Obama and the rest of the non functional Fed government are just as disappointing. I note also that you don't live in an oil state that is ground zero for environmental activism.

I'm glad all is well for you in the beautiful state of Idaho.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 02:23pm PT
. I hear you. You ever see them back then? You follow Henry's column in the LA Weekly?

I saw them in DC but it was the Rollins era. I have some of the original Dez recordings before he blew his voice out. There was a surprisingly strong punk scene in St Louis.

Has there been a punk thread on ST? Might be interesting. I remember gearing up for a solo attempt of of Spaceshot I think it was on thanksgiving. It was fooking cold and I was blasting ministry so loud that the guys on moonlight (or some route over there) were jamming. I guarantee KSolem remembers that particular sound system in the truck. Ha

Anyway, not to hijack. Good stuff. I read Henry's stuff I will look up the LA weeklies
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
Pardon the disturbance Escopeta
But there was some serious talk going on behind the scenes since most everyone was convinced that you were LEB, and had once again duped us all, and had infected our sweet ST with her vile persona

I didn't think you were LEB, since she wasn't a libertarian, so I looked at your past posting and dug up some old climbing posts of yours and saved your ass,

She disguises herself with weird esoteric names and as a trad climber from Red States, so you can see the similarity.
She wouldn't know that Black Flag was a band, and instead think Jesus was asking about the insecticide.

please carry on
dirtbag

climber
Jan 16, 2016 - 03:15pm PT
Another abject failure of the Obama administration: Iran has met the terms of the nuclear deal.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/world-leaders-gathered-in-anticipation-of-iran-sanctions-being-lifted/2016/01/16/72b8295e-babf-11e5-99f3-184bc379b12d_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-banner-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Jan 16, 2016 - 03:18pm PT
Thanks, Obama.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 03:43pm PT
I don't necessarily dig his politics but as I remember from one of his lyrics or maybe a poem: "You can't experience true love unless you've experienced true hate"

A ying for every yang.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 16, 2016 - 04:06pm PT
Actually, I think the thing I appreciate the most about his politics is that they are honest, and they are his.

There are so many people out in the US, the Interwebs and right here on ST that don't have an opinion of their own. They hide behind the constitution, a political party, or even their favorite TV star trying to sell you their views.

I appreciate that he is willing to effectively say "This is MY opinion, such that it is, and I don't care whether you agree or not."

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 16, 2016 - 05:09pm PT
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 16, 2016 - 07:16pm PT
It is interesting to speculate on what the ending of the sanctions will do.

$50B will instantly go into paying pre-existing debts.

My guess is that it will give teh stock market a big bump.

And they will have $50B additional to spend.

The end of Iran’s near-total economic isolation could drive more modernization and open the country to moderating outside influences.

I predict that this will greatly strengthen the moderates.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 17, 2016 - 06:26am PT
Pardon the disturbance Escopeta
But there was some serious talk going on behind the scenes since most everyone was convinced that you were LEB, and had once again duped us all, and had infected our sweet ST with her vile persona

I didn't think you were LEB, since she wasn't a libertarian, so I looked at your past posting and dug up some old climbing posts of yours and saved your ass,

She disguises herself with weird esoteric names and as a trad climber from Red States, so you can see the similarity.
She wouldn't know that Black Flag was a band, and instead think Jesus was asking about the insecticide.

please carry on

I tried to tell you. Its exactly why I turned off my email contact settings. There are some people here that need immediate medical attention for their mental issues. Maybe you are one of them? Oh no, my bad you "saved" me. Thanks again for "saving" me. Good Grief

In the spirit of full disclosure, saying that you looked up an "old" post isn't really saying much. I have lurked here for many years, but am only posting now that the majority of my climbing days are over.

Its been wonderful to reminisce about my personal golden age of climbing while also a bit disheartening to see what "state" climbing is in (politics aside). Seems to be following the same trajectory of a lot of things such as hunting and fishing. Is that a result of the politics? Naw, I don't think so.

On that note, since this is a political thread, maybe you could get some legislation passed that would make it illegal for this LEB person to join. I imagine that would be just dandy for a lot of folks on here. Another alternative would be to hold the forum owner responsible and say that he/she could be arrested if they were to allow this person back on the forum in any way. Problem solved and I can turn my email contact back on since it was nice to re-connect with a few long lost friends.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 17, 2016 - 08:08am PT
Yes, you can thank me for saving you
Get over it
and have a good laugh as well

The LEB disease is like Ebola here, everyone points fingers at it and wants it to go away
and doing the smallest research goes a long a ways against the reactionary knee jerk from most people,
but I'm a skeptic, so I want proof before I make a judgment

There is a long on-going history with us politards
You can't just sneak in and think that no one will question your intentions,
old banned posters come back all the time and try to fit in like nothing happened
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:11am PT
You really ought to consider therapy.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:22am PT
You really ought to be less snarky
you don't really need to make enemies

and didn't I say GET OVER IT

I have a long history here, and a long history of therapy
It's supposed to be all good fun and laughs, don't forget that
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:46am PT
Thanks again for saving me.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:50am PT
Your welcome
Please carry on

do you have any Candidates for President that you would endorse?
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 06:09pm PT
to understand why Washington is hell bent on subdividing and destroying Arabian countries (similar to actions in Africa and Central and South America)

obviously controlling resources is a big deal

but an even bigger deal is preventing Arabia from coming back together as the largest and most powerful nation on earth with immense resources

the technique is to subdivide people along religious and ethnic lines and fund opposing sides who can be manipulated to fight each other

also being done in USA to keep people from effectively collaborating against the controlling oligarchs

the elections are pretty much just a distraction to get people opposing each other
Jorroh

climber
Jan 17, 2016 - 06:28pm PT
"Arabia from coming back together"

Arabia was ever a unified country?
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 07:13pm PT
You are clearly a history buff….

The arabian Ottoman Empire lasted three times longer than the American empire has so far

From Wikipedia:
With Constantinople as its capital and control of lands around the Mediterranean basin, the Ottoman Empire was at the centre of interactions between the Eastern and Western worlds for six centuries. Following a long period of military setbacks against European powers, the Ottoman Empire gradually declined into the late nineteenth century. The empire allied with Germany in the early 20th century, with the imperial ambition of recovering its lost territories, joining in World War I to achieve this ambition on the side of Germany and the Central Powers. While the Empire was able to largely hold its own during the conflict, it was struggling with internal dissent, especially with the Arab Revolt in its Arabian holdings. Starting before the war, but growing increasingly common and violent during it, major atrocities were committed by the Ottoman government against the Armenians, Assyrians and Pontic Greeks.[16] The Empire's defeat and the occupation of part of its territory by the Allied Powers in the aftermath of the conflict resulted in the emergence of a new state, Turkey, in the Ottoman Anatolian heartland following the Independence war, as well as the founding of modern Balkan and Middle Eastern states.

Turkey's current prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is driven to re-establishing the empire, making him a dangerous flashpoint within NATO.
Jorroh

climber
Jan 17, 2016 - 07:56pm PT
I'm pretty sure it never included all that much of the Arabian peninsula, certainly none of the eastern portion.
Was your original comment referring to The Ottoman Empire? when you said Arabia I thought you were referring to the Arabian Peninsula.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 08:31pm PT
so this opens up a much broader discussion about a very complex geo-political arena…where it is much easier to generalize than to be accurate

The Ottomon Empire is gone and broken into many pieces, largely due to European incursions. You can see maps online that show its area and extent over the centuries from 1299-1922

The Arab world stretches from Morocco across Northern Africa to the Persian Gulf. The Arab world is more or less equal to the area known as the Middle East and North Africa. Although this excludes Somalia, Djibouti, and the Comoros Islands which are part of the Arab world. It can also be defined as those countries where Arabic is the dominant language. Arab countries are religiously and ethnically diverse with Islam being the dominant religion in most countries. There are 22 Arab countries/areas: Algeria, Bahrain, the Comoros Islands, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Mauritania, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Iran and Turkey are not Arab countries, although Muslim.

It is often overlooked that the largest Muslim country is Indonesia, which stretches across an area larger than the USA. There are also large Muslim populations in Russia, China, and Southeast Asia.

So if there were going to be a united political unit created, one might call it Arabia for want of a better term, even though only a relatively small percentage of Muslims are arabs. The Islamic State is trying to coopt the concept, but is obviously heavily contested. So I don't know what you might call such a united political federation.

Washington and Europe are extensively immersed in wars and political manipulations to prevent any opportunity for such a united political federation to be created. However Russia's intervention in Syria has just sidetracked Washington's efforts to control the Middle East as part of the Western world's hegemony.
Jorroh

climber
Jan 17, 2016 - 08:51pm PT
"Washington and Europe are extensively immersed in wars and political manipulations to prevent any opportunity for such a united political federation to be created"

I would say that at least two (Iran and Saudi) of the individual components of such a proposed Federation would have a greater interest in preventing it from happening, and would have more to lose, by far, than either Washington or Brussels.

For all their atrocious interventions in the Arab world in the past, I think at this point western countries would love to see more stability in the Arab world.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:19pm PT
For all their atrocious interventions in the Arab world in the past, I think at this point western countries would love to see more stability in the Arab world.

that may be true of at least some significant portion of the US public…i.e. those supporting Bernie Sanders...

again you haven't been paying attention to all the extreme war mongering speeches in the US presidential political debates

even less have you been paying attention to the massive clandestine support being provided to disruptive elements in the area

your comment might be more appropriate applied to Russia and perhaps some of the saner politicians of Europe…

Last fall Russia announced to the UN Security Council that they would no longer allow this state of the world to continue...

and a few days later began stopping the thousands of trucks transporting oil to Turkey that was stolen by ISIS/DAESH from Syria and Iraq

and providing air support for the Syrian army…countering five years of attempts at 'regime change' by Washington and the Saudis

Meanwhile Iran is now poised to dump large amounts of oil into an already glutted market, driving prices down further and destabilizing the already tenuous hold of the Saudi monarchy

do a pin check on your base rigs folks!
Jorroh

climber
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:27pm PT
"again you haven't been paying attention to all the extreme war mongering speeches in the US presidential political debates "

Well thats true, I haven't bothered to watch a single republican debate.

Don't get your knickers in a twist though Tom, no need to call me stupid or uninformed, I'm genuinely interested to hear why you think that the arab nations, with all their animosities and competing interests would have any interest in forming a federation.

TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:28pm PT
sorry, don't intend disrespect…i recognize more than most how hard it is to sleuth out what is really going on these days

the arab speaking countries are in chaotic disarray with many competing agendas and those strong enough to hold part of it together are being selectively eliminated by Washington neocons

this is now translating into Europe and the USA is certainly not immune from the influence of the chaos

the neocon oligarchs controlling the mix promote the chaos to maintain their grip

unfortunately for them the BRICS is now marginalizing them…the Yuan is now an acceptable global currency, putting petrodollars on the sidelines…

and the Washington neocons won't go down without a fight…bristling for war with the Russian/Chinese alliance…which is not a war anyone can win...
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 17, 2016 - 09:47pm PT
I'm genuinely interested to hear why you think that the arab nations, with all their animosities and competing interests would have any interest in forming a federation.

In answer to your question…how about this article in the Atlantic Monthly:

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/04/sultan-erdogan-turkeys-rebranding-into-the-new-old-ottoman-empire/274724/

Sultan Erdogan: Turkey's Rebranding Into the New, Old Ottoman Empire
In the eyes of secularists, the Europe-facing, Western-dressing, cocktail-toasting modern nation-state is being replaced by a religiously conservative one, headscarf by headscarf.

The cities might not seem similar today, but one thing Tripoli and Thessaloniki, Basra and Beirut, Sarajevo and Sana'a all once had in common is that just a little over a century ago they were all part of the Ottoman Empire. A second thing they all have in common is that until just a few years ago they harbored a certain disdain for Turkey ... due in large part to the aforementioned empire.

Yet former rivals to the south, east, north and even west now attend Turkish business summits, watch Turkish shows, and purchase Turkish groceries. Interestingly and perhaps contrary to common sense, this recent shift seems to come not as a product of "time healing old wounds" but rather at a period when Turkey has embraced its Ottoman heritage to an unheard-of level.

The most popular television show, Magnificent Century, is essentially a soap opera set in the court of Suleiman the Magnificent, a bit like the Tudors but with even more imposing facial hair.

But beyond foreign policy there lies a much more significant domestic transformation, one that is also driven by history. In that same speech, the foreign minister spoke of the need for a "great restoration" where "we need to embrace fully the ancient values we have lost." Praising the historic bonds that connected the peoples of Turkey over the "new identities that were thrust upon us in the modern era," Davutoglu maintained that the road to Turkey's progress lies in its past - an assertion that has terrified the government's detractors
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 18, 2016 - 12:28pm PT
Tom: It's an interesting idea but if any of them unite it will be sectarian in nature. My limited knowledge of the politics is that the Shia and Sunni majority countries just aren't going to be able to pull something like that off with each other unless the whole Arab world came under attack by a common enemy (e.g. the US). Additionally, most of the leaders of those countries are despots who have no interest in giving up power. Those kinds of people would generally rather be king of sh#t mountain than Vice-President of the United Arab States.


The Democratic debate was too much for me to bear last night. I was tired but I found it intolerable. The closer we get to the voting the more inauthentic all these people get. It's painful.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 18, 2016 - 03:38pm PT


I agree regarding the secular nature of a political federation if you look at the broad mix of religions, sects, tribes and ethnicities involved

However it has happened before and lasted for centuries

how the modern set of despots got into power is another matter entirely and supports my perspective and is generally not well understood in this country


it will take more than a presidential election to heal this nation


The 21st Century: An Era Of Fraud — Paul Craig Roberts
January 18, 2016

In the last years of the 20th century fraud entered US foreign policy in a new way. On false pretenses Washington dismantled Yugoslavia and Serbia in order to advance an undeclared agenda. In the 21st century this fraud multiplied many times. Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and Libya were destroyed, and Iran and Syria would also have been destroyed if the President of Russia had not prevented it. Washington is also behind the current destruction of Yemen, and Washington has enabled and financed the Israeli destruction of Palestine. Additionally, Washington operated militarily within Pakistan without declaring war, murdering many women, children, and village elders under the guise of “combating terrorism.” Washington’s war crimes rival those of any country in history.

I have documented these crimes in my columns and books (Clarity Press).
Anyone who still believes in the purity of Washington’s foreign policy is a lost soul.

Russia and China now have a strategic alliance that is too strong for Washington. Russia and China will prevent Washington from further encroachments on their security and national interests. Those countries important to Russia and China will be protected by the alliance. As the world wakes up and sees the evil that the West represents, more countries will seek the protection of Russia and China.

America is also failing on the economic front. My columns and my book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism, which has been published in English, Chinese, Korean, Czech, and German, have shown how Washington has stood aside, indeed cheering it on, while the short-term profit interests of management, shareholders, and Wall Street eviscerated the American economy, sending manufacturing jobs, business know-how, and technology, along with professional tradeable skill jobs, to China, India, and other countries, leaving America with such a hollowed out economy that the median family income has been falling for years. Today 50% of 25 year-old Americans are living with their parents or grandparents because they cannot find employment sufficient to sustain an independent existance. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-27/why-are-half-all-25-year-olds-still-living-their-parents-federal-reserve-answers This brutal fact is covered up by the presstitute US media, a source of fantasy stories of America’s economic recovery.

The facts of our existence are so different from what is reported that I am astonished. As a former professor of economics, Wall Street Journal editor and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy, I am astonished at the corruption that rules in the financial sector, the Treasury, the financial regulatory agencies, and the Federal Reserve. In my day, there would have been indictments and prison sentences of bankers and high government officials.

In America today there are no free financial markets. All the markets are rigged by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury. The regulatory agencies, controlled by those the agencies are supposed to regulate, turn a blind eye, and even if they did not, they are helpless to enforce any law, because private interests are more powerful than the law.

Even the government’s statistical agencies have been corrupted. Inflation measures have been concocted in order to understate inflation. This lie not only saves Washington from paying Social Security cost-of-living adjustments and frees the money for more wars, but also by understating inflation, the government can create real GDP growth by counting inflation as real growth, just as the government creates 5% unemployment by not counting any discouraged workers who have looked for jobs until they can no longer afford the cost of looking and give up. The official unemployment rate is 5%, but no one can find a job. How can the unemployment rate be 5% when half of 25-year olds are living with relatives because they cannot afford an independent existence? As John Williams (shadowfacts) reports, the unemployment rate that includes those Americans who have given up looking for a job because there are no jobs to be found is 23%.

The Federal Reserve, a tool of a small handful of banks, has succeeded in creating the illusion of an economic recovery since June, 2009, by printing trillions of dollars that found their way not into the economy but into the prices of financial assets. Artificially booming stock and bond markets are the presstitute financial media’s “proof” of a booming economy.

The handful of learned people that America has left, and it is only a small handful, understand that there has been no recovery from the previous recession and that a new downturn is upon us. John Williams has pointed out that US industrial production, when properly adjusted for inflation, has never recovered its 2008 level, much less its 2000 peak, and has again turned down.

The American consumer is exhausted, overwhelmed by debt and lack of income growth. The entire economic policy of America is focused on saving a handful of NY banks, not on saving the American economy.

Economists and other Wall Street shills will dismiss the decline in industrial production as America is now a service economy. Economists pretend that these are high-tech services of the New Economy, but in fact waitresses, bartenders, part time retail clerks, and ambulatory health care services have replaced manufacturing and engineering jobs at a fraction of the pay, thus collapsing effective aggregate demand in the US. On occasions when neoliberal economists recognize problems, they blame them on China.

It is unclear that the US economy can be revived. To revive the US economy would require the re-regulation of the financial system and the recall of the jobs and US GDP that offshoring gave to foreign countries. It would require, as Michael Hudson demonstrates in his new book, Killing the Host, a revolution in tax policy that would prevent the financial sector from extracting economic surplus and capitalizing it in debt obligations paying interest to the financial sector.

The US government, controlled as it is by corrupt economic interests, would never permit policies that impinged on executive bonuses and Wall Street profits. Today US capitalism makes its money by selling out the American economy and the people dependent upon it.

In “freedom and democracy” America, the government and the economy serve interests totally removed from the interests of the American people. The sellout of the American people is protected by a huge canopy of propaganda provided by free market economists and financial presstitutes paid to lie for their living.

When America fails, so will Washington’s vassal states in Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan. Unless Washington destroys the world in nuclear war, the world will be remade, and the corrupt and dissolute West will be an insignificant part of the new world.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 18, 2016 - 05:21pm PT
That's a pretty myopic viewpoint and I would challenge his conclusion by asking the equally cynical question, "is what follows the American empire going to be any less corrupt?"


Here is an article in the New Republic that does a good job of articulating and expanding upon my view of the Democratic race: http://newrepublic.com/article/127925/say-want-revolution-bernie

Max Weber, the great sociologist best remembered for coining the phrase “Protestant work ethic,” would have loved Sunday’s Democratic debate. Leaving aside the sad and quixotic figure of Martin O’Malley, the two main contenders Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders perfectly illustrated a distinction Weber made in his classic 1919 essay “Politics as a Vocation.” In that essay, Weber distinguished between two different ethical approaches to politics, an “ethics of moral conviction” and an “ethics of responsibility.”

It's well worth a read.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 18, 2016 - 07:20pm PT
i like to envision a world in which politicians and managers have the best interests of the people and the planet at heart

world events don't seem to encourage a lot of hope in that regard

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 18, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Jan 18, 2016 - 07:44pm PT
Never fear Snyder is all over it...Can't wait to see how many lawsuits get filed for lead poisioning..
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 18, 2016 - 10:34pm PT
how about the lawsuits against Japan and GE when people find out how radiation levels in this country are now hundreds of times above background levels
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 19, 2016 - 09:16am PT
when people find out how radiation levels in this country are now hundreds of times above background levels
Got any scientific studies that show that the background levels are higher.

and on another topic

Are there any good Red States anymore?
or have the Governors and their cronies turned them all into bankrupt hell holes with no jobs and an out of control police force that's agenda is to throw everyone in jail
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 19, 2016 - 09:39am PT
Are there any good Red States anymore?

No. Hell holes. Every single one. You should avoid them at all costs.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 19, 2016 - 10:05am PT
There is a collaborative monitoring system getting off the ground. People put personal counter readings on the net. They are not calibrated to a baseline.
At this point it's only really good for monitoring disasters, and there in only one in Japan.

http://radiationnetwork.com

Such is trust in our governments. There was an uptick in the USA during fujishima, especially the Nw coast.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 19, 2016 - 11:13am PT
Sketch, you got that right, I will avoid them like the plague
and I will advise all others that care about human rights to do the same


I haven't heard about any raise in radiation background levels, in fact scientists said they haven't risen, but I am willing to see any data that isn't biased.

But I AM pissed that the corporatists (fascists) that control our government have made checking seafood for radiation levels ILLEGAL!!

Why wouldn't we want to know if the food has high radiation levels?

Because then you won't eat it silly, and profits TRUMP human health
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 19, 2016 - 11:14am PT
^^^^

If only more people would heed your advice.......

We are due for a harsh winter to send the tards back to the PRK.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jan 19, 2016 - 11:41am PT
Sketch, you got that right, I will avoid them like the plague

Win-win.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 20, 2016 - 05:20am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]


Colbert and DeRay McKesson discuss BLM and what white privilege means and why people have such a hard time talking about it.


Sarah Palin's endorsement of Trump. It's as Palin as you'd want it to be:

[Click to View YouTube Video]



I, too, hope to one day master the art of the "dill."
F

climber
away from the ground
Jan 20, 2016 - 08:28am PT
From ADN


Sarah Palin’s meandering, fiery, sarcastic, patriotic and blustery speech endorsing Donald Trump for president Tuesday in Ames, Iowa, does not easily submit to categorization.

It has been described as performance art, a filibuster, even slam poetry.

Palin has always been a singular force on the campaign trail. But in her years away from politics, the former Alaska governor and Sen. John McCain’s Republican vice-presidential pick in 2008 seems to have spurred a whole new series of idiosyncratic expressions and unusual locutions — to the point where even Trump seemed occasionally mystified as he tried to follow along.

Below, a list of 10 of the more memorable lines of the speech, and an attempt to translate them:

“They stomp on our neck, and then they tell us, ‘Just chill, OK, just relax.’ Well, look, we are mad, and we’ve been had. They need to get used to it.”

An impressive example of internal rhyme — if a tad violent, as Palin describes the Republican establishment trying to quash the anger of the party’s rebellious base.

“We’re talking about no more Reaganesque power that comes from strength. Power through strength.”

Whoops! Palin seems to be grasping for President Ronald Reagan’s signature Cold War slogan, “Peace through strength.”

“And you quit footing the bill for these nations who are oil-rich, we’re paying for some of their squirmishes that have been going on for centuries. Where they’re fighting each other and yelling ‘Allahu akbar,’ calling jihad on each other’s heads forever and ever. Like I’ve said before, let them duke it out and let Allah sort it out.”

Here, Palin accomplishes many things unusual for a political speaker: She recites the Arabic phrase for “God is great,” and, more notably, coins a new word, squirmishes, a cross between squirm (which means to wriggle the body from side to side) and skirmish (which means a brief fight or encounter between small groups). Twitter embraced the new term instantly.

“How about the rest of us? Right-winging, bitter-clinging, proud clingers of our guns, our God, and our religion, and our Constitution.”

Remember President Barack Obama’s famously dismissive description of conservatives as bitter people who “cling to guns or religion” before a crowd of wealthy donors in San Francisco? Palin wants to make sure you never forget it.

“He is from the private sector, not a politician. Can I get a ‘Hallelujah!’”

Palin goes godly as she enthuses about the business world.

“Mr. Trump, you’re right, look back there in the press box. Heads are spinning, media heads are spinning. This is going to be so much fun.”

This is perhaps the most accurate statement in her speech.

“In fact it’s time to drill, baby, drill down, and hold these folks accountable.”

The slogan Palin popularized in 2008 just won’t die. And it has taken on metaphoric meaning now.


“Well, and then, funny, ha ha, not funny, but now, what they’re doing is wailing, ‘Well, Trump and his Trumpeters, they’re not conservative enough.’”

We’re still stumped by this one.

“And he, who would negotiate deals, kind of with the skills of a community organizer maybe organizing a neighborhood tea, well, he deciding that, ‘No, America would apologize as part of the deal,’ as the enemy sends a message to the rest of the world that they capture and we kowtow, and we apologize, and then, we bend over and say, ‘Thank you, enemy.’”

It’s a mouthful. But this section, in which Palin contrasts Trump with Obama, has everything she relishes: Mockery of Obama’s early years working in Chicago neighborhoods, right-wing accusations that the president has apologized for America, and a crude reference to him as a submissive sissy on foreign policy.

“He’s got the guts to wear the issues that need to be spoken about and debate on his sleeve, where the rest of some of these establishment candidates, they just wanted to duck and hide. They didn’t want to talk about these issues until he brought ’em up. In fact, they’ve been wearing a, this, political correctness kind of like a suicide vest.”

Her biggest misstep in the speech: In 2016, fear of suicide bombers is real for many, not the stuff of political punch lines.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 21, 2016 - 05:39am PT
The new CNN/WMUR New Hampshire primary poll reports that only about 31% of Republicans have firmly decided who they will vote for and 43% have not made up their mind at all. 34% support Trump, 14% Cruz and 20% list Cruz as their second choice. 30% say that they would never, ever consider voting for Trump, 18% say Bush and nobody else is even close. This seems to show that the primary is still way, way up in the air.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 21, 2016 - 07:39pm PT
The Koch Brothers are pulling in several tens of billions a year

Lets say they make $5 billion

that's $2,403,846 per hour
or $40,000 per minute

and they want to use their riches to fix the system so they make even more riches, and the GOP and SCOTUS are very happy to take their money and give them what they want

Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Jan 21, 2016 - 09:11pm PT
Nah Craig, that's actually $570,776.26/hr (24 hour work day) or $9512.93/minute. Peanuts. For an eight hour day, that's only $28,538.79/minute. But I guess they get time and a half for overtime.

What irks me is wealthy persons pay a maximum of 20% tax rate on capital gains and I, a stupid schlub, pay full income tax rate for my meager savings account interest. Isn't that a capital gain? I'm getting suspicious that the game MIGHT be rigged. But I'm sure they wouldn't do that even if they could.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 22, 2016 - 05:07am PT
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of it.


7SacredPools

Trad climber
Ontario, Canada
Jan 22, 2016 - 05:15am PT
Actually, you can. Civilized countries all do it to various degrees.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 22, 2016 - 05:24am PT
Well, I guess you might say that it works up until the point the wealthy aren't wealthy anymore.

Braunini

Big Wall climber
cupertino
Jan 22, 2016 - 06:14am PT
hey awesome another political thread
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 22, 2016 - 08:06am PT
Escopeta posted
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of it.


You cannot straw man your way out of an argument that your opponent did not straw man their way into.



7SacredPools posted
Actually, you can. Civilized countries all do it to various degrees.

No they don't. They raise the marginal rates to pay for social programs that ensure stable, healthy populations and workforces. If there is a case of a liberal democracy "legislating the wealthy out of their wealth" I'd love to see it. Escopeta's argument here is basically that raising the marginal tax rates on higher income earners will make everyone poor. That's why everyone was poor in the 50's and 60's. (They weren't)

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 22, 2016 - 09:53am PT
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/veterans-assail-sarah-palin-for-1348174729601078.html


Veterans assail Sarah Palin for pinning son’s alleged domestic violence on PTSD


Trump told CNN’s Don Lemmon Wednesday night that it was his call for Palin to publicly question Obama’s support of veterans’ care.

“I thought it was good for many other sons and daughters coming back from the Middle East where they have traumatic problems, and I suggested it,” Trump said.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Jan 23, 2016 - 03:50am PT
Herr Trümp

A'cloistering from south to north,
All gathering to waddle forth,
They flock to him from west to east,
All rabid fans to say the least,

And read the measure of the man,
With heads sunk firmly in sand,
They gravitate in fervent bands,
With outstretched arms and clenching hands,

And signing on their fate is sealed,
By the deal this pompous ass has wheeled,
The angry mob to which he appeals,
Their hearts and minds now to him steeled,

With posture arrogant and snide,
His art to heckle and deride,
He's courting power like a bride,
All lack of pretense set aside,

So far and broad his net is cast,
Stifling all protest un-harrassed,
His billions hold his minions fast,
Blinding them to his checkered past,

He's brainwashed most and suckered in,
His 'art of the deal' the support he wins,
His wealth and power a polished gem,
To hypnotize and dazzle them,

So trumpets forth the Trump-full mind,
And delegates to them in kind,
To stir up Tea Bags left behind,
What dregs that Sara Palin finds,

To criticize and to ostracize,
All those unfaithful and so unwise,
To doubt false patriotic lies,
All this I shudder to surmise,

To say that once I did believe,
This land was made for you and me,
I know now freedom isn't free,
And love of money's n'er the key,

Mistake not others lack of dearth,
What's given some right from their birth,
While others die and bleed to earth,
How can we measure what that's worth?

A sacrifice honored with pride,
A treasure spread so spare and wide,
It leaves no unturned rock to hide,
So vote, it counts how we decide,

I give you this soliloquy,
To think beyond fear what could be,
Should we provide the recipe,
For Donald Trump and World War Three.

-bushman
01/22/2016
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 23, 2016 - 06:43pm PT
All Radiation Counts reported are partial Counts. Uncounted types of radiation include Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Neutron and X-Ray radiation. Uncounted radiation, if added, makes the actual Count higher and more dangerous.

The highest radiation reporting city is listed first, the least radioactive city reporting is listed last. Still, all reporting cities are above normal. These are the American cities that exceeded 1,000 CPM during the week Oct 10 to Oct 17, 2015 and their CPM Count.

I just could not overlook Washington DC at 372 CPM, not even a low for the District.

Normal Radiation is 5 to 20 CPM. [6]

1962 CPM, 392.4 Times Normal, Billings, MT Gamma, Beta.
1853 CPM, 370.6 Times Normal, Louisville, KY Gamma, Beta
1645 CPM, 329 Times Normal, Pierre, SD Gamma, Beta.
1545 CPM, 309 Times Normal, San Diego, CA Inactive 10 -15
1496 CPM, 299.2 Times Normal, Lexington, KY Gamma, Beta
1425 CPM, 285 Times Normal, Miami, FL. Gamma, Beta.
1422 CPM, 284.4 Times Normal, Portland, ME Last Reading
1393 CPM, 278.6 Times Normal, Navajo Lake, NM Gamma, Beta.
1355 CPM, 271 Times Normal, Mason City, IA Gamma, Beta.
1347 CPM, 269.4 Times Normal, Denver, CO. Gamma, Beta.
1311 CPM, 262.2 Times Normal, Rapid City, SD. Gamma, Beta.
1311 CPM, 262.2 Times Normal, Spokane, WA. Gamma, Beta.
1261 CPM, 252.2 Times Normal, Little Rock, AR Gamma, Beta.
1234 CPM, 246.8 Times Normal, Kansas City, KA, Gamma, Beta.
1228 CPM, 245.6 Times Normal, Fresno, CA Gamma, Beta.
1221 CPM, 244.2 Times Normal, Idaho Falls, ID Gamma, Beta.
1214 CPM, 242.8 Times Normal, Fresno, CA. Gamma, Beta.
1214 CPM, 242.8 Times Normal, Kearney. NE Dead Inactive Oct2015
1213 CPM, 242.6 Times Normal, Harrisburg, VA. Gamma, Beta.
1205 CPM, 241 Times Normal, New York City, NY Gamma, Beta.
1203 CPM, 240.6 Times Normal, Charleston, WV. Gamma, Beta.
1171 CPM, 234.2 Times Normal, Bakersfield, CA Gamma, Beta.
1166 CPM, 233.2 Times Normal, Tulsa, OK Gamma, Beta.
1159 CPM, 231.8 Times Normal, Concord, NH Gamma, Beta.
1145 CPM, 229 Times Normal, Bismark, ND. Gamma, Beta.
1130 CPM, 226 Times Normal, Worcester, MA. Gamma, Beta.
1121 CPM, 224.2 Times Normal, El Paso, TX. Gamma, Beta.
1121 CPM, 224.2 Times Normal, Tucson, AZ Gamma, Beta.
1116 CPM, 223.2 Times Normal, Memphis, TN Gamma, Beta.
1115 CPM, 223 Times Normal, Tallahassee, FL. Gamma, Beta.
1095 CPM, 219 Times Normal, Jefferson City, MO Gamma, Beta.
1088 CPM, 217.6 Times Normal, Champaign, IL Gamma, Beta.
1083 CPM, 216.6 Times Normal, Richmond, VA Gamma, Beta.
1081 CPM, 216.2 Times Normal, Atlanta, GA. Gamma, Beta.
1071 CPM, 214.2 Times Normal, Laredo, TX. Gamma, Beta.
1056 CPM, 211.2 Times Normal, Hartford, CT Gamma, Beta.
1030 CPM, 206 Times Normal, Wichita, KA. Gamma, Beta.
1029 CPM, 205.8 Times Normal, Riverside, CA. Gamma, Beta.
1028 CPM, 205.6 Times Normal, Phoenix, AZ Gamma, Beta.
1010 CPM, 202 Times Normal, Pittsburgh, PA, Gamma, Beta.
1009 CPM, 201.8 Times Normal, Oklahoma City, OK. Gamma, Beta.
372 CPM, 74.4 Times Normal, Washington, DC. Gamma, Beta.
Normal Radiation is 5 to 20 CPM. [6]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/10/17/your-radiation-this-week-no-26/

1,696 CPM, 339.2 Times Normal, Little Rock, AR Beta, Gamma.
1,591 CPM, 318.2 Times Normal, Miami, FL. Beta, Gamma.
1,584 CPM, 316.8 Times Normal, Colorado Springs, CO. Beta, Gamma.
1,480 CPM, 296 Times Normal, Pierre, SD Beta, Gamma.
1,478 CPM, 295.6 Times Normal, Billings, MT Beta, Gamma.
1,382 CPM, 276.4 Times Normal, Memphis, TN Beta, Gamma.
1,380 CPM, 276 Times Normal, Grand Junction, CO Beta, Gamma.
1,352 CPM, 270.4 Times Normal, Yuma, AZ. Beta, Gamma.
1,316 CPM, 263.2 Times Normal, Louisville, KY Beta, Gamma.
1,303 CPM, 260.6 Times Normal, Spokane, WA. Beta, Gamma.
1,278 CPM, 255.6 Times Normal, Lubbock TX. MIA, 5 Yr High
1,223 CPM, 244.6 Times Normal, Pittsburgh, PA, Beta, Gamma.
1,193 CPM, 238.6 Times Normal, Raleigh, NC. Beta, Gamma.
1,193 CPM, 238.6 Times Normal, Rapid City, SD. Beta, Gamma.
1,191 CPM, 238.2 Times Normal, Portland, ME Beta, Gamma.
1,159 CPM, 231.8 Times Normal, Navajo Lake, NM Beta, Gamma.
1,141 CPM, 228.2 Times Normal, Laredo, TX. Beta, Gamma.
1,119 CPM, 223.8 Times Normal, Omaha, NE. Beta, Gamma.
1,091 CPM, 218.2 Times Normal, Tulsa, OK Beta, Gamma.
1,085 CPM, 217 Times Normal, Kearney, NE. Beta, Gamma.
1,084 CPM, 216.8 Times Normal, Oklahoma City, OK. Beta, Gamma.
1,078 CPM, 215.6 Times Normal, Worcester, MA. Beta, Gamma.
1,068 CPM, 213.6 Times Normal, Boise, ID. Beta, Gamma.
1,059 CPM, 211.8 Times Normal, Idaho Falls, ID Beta, Gamma.
1,051 CPM, 210.2 Times Normal, Lexington, KY Beta, Gamma.
1,049 CPM, 209.8 Times Normal, Bismark, ND. Beta, Gamma.
1,040 CPM, 208 Times Normal, Hartford, CT Beta, Gamma.
1,025 CPM, 205 Times Normal, St George, UT. Beta, Gamma.
1,019 CPM, 203.8 Times Normal, Riverside, CA. Beta, Gamma.
1,008 CPM, 201.6 Times Normal, El Paso, TX. Beta, Gamma.
383 CPM, 76.6 Times Normal, Washington, DC. High Tampered with.
73 CPM, 14.6 Times Normal, Washington, DC. Low Tampered with.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/01/16/your-radiation-this-week-no-39/
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 24, 2016 - 06:59am PT
Bushman: Well done, sir.


Tom: Thanks, I guess? Are you suggesting that someone set off a dirty bomb in the snowstorm?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Jan 24, 2016 - 07:45am PT
HighDesertDJ. Tom's radiation list source: Veterans Today is a pretty mind-warping read. The authors there are not of my universe. I recall that the smoking duck reads it too.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 24, 2016 - 11:08pm PT
Cuba is personal for Rubio. His parents were born there, and his grandfather — the single greatest influence on his political thinking — despised what Fidel Castro did to his homeland. In his memoir, Rubio wrote that as a child, “I boasted I would someday lead an army of exiles to overthrow Fidel Castro and become president of a free Cuba.”


He would sit at the feet of his grandfather, a Ronald Reagan-loving, cigar-smoking shoemaker named Pedro Victor Garcia, and listen to him describe how communism destroyed lives in Cuba and how the United States had a unique role to play in the world as the enforcer of freedom.

This is critical.

If you don't want war, Rubio is not your guy. Anyone who thinks that the US is the defender of freedom, world-wide, is just waiting to interfere with someone's gov't, who is not "pure" enough for them.


Today, Rubio often echoes his grandfather when he talks about his support for the use of U.S. military might and his belief in “American exceptionalism.”


But in much of the country and even in Miami, attitudes about Cuba shifted as decades of diplomatic and economic sanctions proved ineffective. Polls show more than 70 percent of Americans support Obama’s decision to restore relations and promote other efforts to open up the island nation.

There has been no U.S. envoy in Mexico City since August because Rubio is holding up the nomination of Assistant Secretary of State Roberta Jacobson, who led negotiations with Cuba as the United States moved toward more engagement.

“He is trying to stick a finger in the eye of the president” over Cuba by blocking her, said Flake, the Arizona Republican.

Flake thinks it’s a mistake. So do 19 Latino members of Congress who signed a letter to Rubio protesting his hold on her nomination. They argue it has nothing to do with her qualifications and is a slight to Mexico, a key ally and trading partner.

=

“The majority of presidential energy and detail” needs to be spent on issues that have “direct impact on both our economic security and national security,” he said. That means “big geopolitical threats” and smaller ones that could grow.

Oh, so if he perceives that another country or company "have an impact" on our economic security, intervention is justified.

There, my friends, are why we went into Iraq. And start to think about where we will go next.....
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jan 24, 2016 - 11:23pm PT
Donald Trump gains 15 points on Ted Cruz in Iowa in two weeks

This coincides with bringing up that Cruz is Canadian. Brilliant timing.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 25, 2016 - 01:09am PT
A bit of Karma, since Ted's dad told Tea partiers in 2012 that Obama should go back to Kenya.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/rafael-cruz-birther_n_4181207.html

[Click to View YouTube Video]
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jan 25, 2016 - 03:27pm PT
Ha!!! Apologies by Fox News coming...(never). Problem: Where will we go now for "baby parts"?

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Houston grand jury investigating undercover footage of Planned Parenthood found no wrongdoing Monday by the abortion provider and instead indicted anti-abortion activists involved in making the videos that provoked outrage among Republican leaders nationwide.

David Daleiden, founder of the Center for Medical Progress, was indicted on a felony charge of tampering with a governmental record and a misdemeanor count related to purchasing human organs. Another activist, Sandra Merritt, was also indicted on a charge of tampering with a governmental record. It's the first time anyone in the group has been charged criminally since the videos started surfacing last year.

In a statement announcing the indictment, Harris County District Attorney Devon Anderson didn't provide details on the charges, including what record or records were allegedly tampered with and why Daleiden faces a charge related to buying human organs. Anderson's office said it could not provide details until the documents charging Daleiden and Merritt were formally made public, which was expected later Monday.

"We were called upon to investigate allegations of criminal conduct by Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast," Anderson's statement said. "As I stated at the outset of this investigation, we must go where the evidence leads us."

The anti-abortion Center for Medical Progress has released several covertly shot videos of Planned Parenthood officials discussing the handling of fetal tissue from abortions. The center claims that Planned Parenthood illegally sold fetal tissue; Planned Parenthood officials have denied any wrongdoing and have said the videos were misleadingly edited.

A phone message left seeking comment from the center about Monday's indictment wasn't immediately returned.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jan 25, 2016 - 03:52pm PT
"Must kill to save the babies"
"No More Baby Parts!"

the last words of a domestic right wing terrorist

I wonder why he thought that Planned Parenthood was selling Baby parts?
Oh yea, the non-stop lies on the Right Wing Terrorist State Media, Fox News
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Jan 25, 2016 - 03:56pm PT
it is extraordinarily difficult to obtain reliable news and information in today's society

misleading claims, disinformation, and false flag operations have become standard practice by governments and powerful players

even a casual examination of the controlled media reveals its primary role as distracting entertainment with only casual relationships to the facts and very little or no reporting on many critical events

i also do not vouch for the credibility of any particular news source, whether establishment or alternative

however some sources seem to exercise more research and close examination of events from more or less biased viewpoints

if you want to understand any events outside of your own personal sphere of presence, then your best chance is to examine as many sources as you can and then postulate your own analysis

it is just as important to try and understand the bias and agenda of the sources as it is to understand what is being reported

part of my appreciation for these Supertopo threads is the variety of viewpoints shared

you are on your own folks

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 25, 2016 - 04:59pm PT
Tom posted
even a casual examination of the controlled media reveals its primary role as distracting entertainment with only casual relationships to the facts and very little or no reporting on many critical events

So to be clear, your are proposing that the east coast has been irradiated and there is a cover up so massive that tens of thousands of scientists and tens of thousands of journalists and tens of thousands of doctors are staying silent at the behest of the government?


Crank: New Hampshire yanked it's PP contract based on this controversy and I gave one of my reps an earful about it at the time. He's about to get another earful.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Jan 25, 2016 - 05:30pm PT
What a shock. Turns out the folks who made the accusations are being charged with felony indictments.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/26/us/2-abortion-foes-behind-planned-parenthood-videos-are-indicted.html?_r=0
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 25, 2016 - 06:15pm PT
The irony of the video makers being charged with organ trafficking is almost too much to bear.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 26, 2016 - 10:03am PT
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-republican-party-may-be-failing/

The Republican Party May Be Failing
What “The Party Decides” could get wrong about Donald Trump and the GOP.

By NATE SILVER

“The Party Decides,” the 2008 book by the political scientists Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel and John Zaller, has probably been both the most-cited and the most-maligned book of this election cycle. After re-reading the book, which underpinned a lot of our early analysis of the primaries here at FiveThirtyEight, I’ve come to another conclusion: It’s probably also the most misunderstood book of the 2016 campaign.

The caricature of the book seems to be this: “The Party Decides” posits a clash between “the establishment” and rank-and-file voters and claims that the establishment always prevails. But that’s not really what the book says. Instead, the book argues that the major American political parties are broad and diverse coalitions of politicians, activists and interest groups, many of whom would never think of themselves as belonging to the political establishment.

However, the book does presume that, in part because of their breadth and diversity, American political parties are strong institutions. Furthermore, it assumes that strong, highly functional parties are able to make presidential nominations that further the party’s best interest.

For a variety of reasons, the nomination of Donald Trump would probably not be in the best interest of the Republican Party. Such an outcome this year, which seems increasingly likely, would either imply that the book’s hypothesis was wrong all along — or that the current Republican Party is weak and dysfunctional and perhaps in the midst of a realignment.1

The party isn’t “the establishment”

You might associate “The Party Decides” with an empirical claim made in the book: Endorsements made by influential Republicans and Democrats are a good predictor of who will win each party’s nomination. At FiveThirtyEight, we’ve been keeping track of a subset of those endorsements, those made by current governors and members of Congress in each party.

Our focus on endorsements by governors and members of Congress is mostly a matter of convenience, however.2 In “The Party Decides,” the authors consider a much broader array of endorsers, including state legislators, labor unions, interest groups and even celebrities. This is important because, in contrast to earlier scholarship that thinks of parties as consisting solely of politicians and party organizations like the Republican National Committee, the authors of “The Party Decides” take a more inclusive view. Their parties include not just elected officials but also “religious organizations, civil rights groups … organizers, fundraisers, pollsters, and media specialists” and even “citizen activists who join the political fray as weekend warriors.”

That means the term “Republican establishment” (in addition to its other problems) is not a good approximation for the book’s view on the party. “Anti-establishment” members of Congress, such as the Freedom Caucus, are parts of “the party” as much as members who always vote with leadership. Lots of people within Washington, D.C., are considered to be part of the “party,” but so are people in Kentucky and Alaska. The editors of National Review magazine are probably3 part of the Republican Party as the book’s authors would define it, but so are bloggers at RedState and conservative talk-radio hosts in Iowa.

The authors of “The Party Decides” use phrases like “party elites” and “party insiders” to describe this collection of people. An alternative that I sometimes prefer is “influential Democrats” and “influential Republicans.” That’s really the bottom line: These people have some ability to influence the nomination,4 and they have some interest in doing so. That influence could take many forms, including holding a position of power, having access to a donor network, possessing scarce skills or knowledge, contributing time or money, or having the ability to persuade others through a media platform.

It might even be tempting to boil down “The Party Decides” to an idea like this: You ought to pay attention to what influential people who care about a party nomination are doing, since they can have a lot of say in the outcome. Indeed, that’s probably a better representation of “The Party Decides” than the idea that a monolithic establishment always wins.

But the book has something more than that in mind. Parties are not merely collections of influential people; those people are supposed to be working together to further the party’s interests. If they “can agree to work together for a candidate, as usually they can, they constitute a formidable political force,” the book says. But they cede much of that power when they remain splintered.

The mechanics of this are complicated, obviously. Some groups within a party care a great deal about winning office. Others are more interested in policy or ideological victories. Moreover, in a given election, a party can only nominate one candidate; if she wins office, she’ll have only so much political capital. Which issues get priority and which ones get short shrift?

But if the parties in “The Party Decides” are complicated, that’s because real American political parties are complicated, too. It’s not inherently obvious what anti-abortion activists, the National Rifle Association, the oil lobby and movement conservative intellectuals have in common — but all of them usually associate themselves with the Republican Party and they potentially stand to gain by working together under its banner.5 Historically, the result of this party-building process has been a punctuated equilibrium of parties that can be stable for decades at a time but which occasionally undergo rapid and dramatic realignments.

Strong parties nominate strong candidates

So the party always wins? Not quite. Blame the book’s title if you like (the long version is: “The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform”). It seems to imply that the Republican and Democratic parties are all-powerful, with voters merely going along for the ride. That’s not quite what the authors say, however. “We do not claim that parties are juggernauts that always prevail,” they write in the first chapter.

The authors are also aware of the limited data available on party nominations. “The greatest point of vulnerability, in our view, lies in the thinness of the data that underlie the analysis,” they write. “Our main analyses involve sixty-one candidates, but these candidates ran in only ten nomination contests — and ten is not a large number for making inferences about a process as complicated as presidential nominations.”6 Being aware of these limitations is not the same thing as working around them, of course. But generally speaking, I think the book does a pretty good job under the conditions. (For geeky readers, I have a longer discussion in the footnotes.7)

One reason I say this is because the claims made by “The Party Decides” are modest. The authors aren’t saying that parties can wave a magic wand and nominate whomever they like. Instead, they posit that American political parties are robust and diverse institutions. And they claim that these parties make fairly rational choices in whom they nominate for president. The closest the book comes to a thesis statement is this:

Parties are a systematic force in presidential nominations and a major reason that all nominees since the 1970s have been credible and at least reasonably electable representatives of their partisan traditions.

There are a couple of things to unpack here. First, that qualification “since the 1970s.” That refers, in part, to the nomination process that’s been in place since the McGovern-Fraser reforms, which greatly increased voter participation in the system. However, it conveniently also excludes the Democratic nominations of 1972 and 1976, which were contested under the new system but resulted in the choice of factional candidates, George McGovern and Jimmy Carter.

The book’s view is that party elites had yet to learn the nuances of the new rules, whereas McGovern and Carter had clever strategies to exploit them. (In McGovern’s case, focusing on delegate accumulation instead of the popular vote; in Carter’s, understanding that a strong performance in Iowa could produce media-fueled momentum that would give him a leg up in subsequent contests.) Perhaps, but these years also suggest that the power wielded by party elites is fragile and that unconventional candidates can win if they (like Trump) pursue unconventional strategies.

Nonetheless, truly disastrous nominations like McGovern’s have been rare. Instead, parties have usually nominated candidates who, as the book puts it, are:

“Credible and at least reasonably electable”;
“Representatives of their partisan traditions.”
You might describe these two dimensions (as we sometimes have) as “electability” and “ideological fit.” The goal for a party is to find a candidate who scores highly along both axes. George W. Bush in 2000, for example, was acceptable to all major factions of the GOP, but he also began the race as a “compassionate conservative” with a highly favorable image among general election voters. It’s no surprise that Bush won his nomination easily.

At other times, the party must contemplate a trade-off between these goals. Sometimes, it will choose a candidate who breaks with party orthodoxy in important ways, but who has a lot of crossover appeal to general election voters. Bill Clinton in 1992 and John McCain in 2008 are good examples. Or, it may go for broke with an ideologically “pure” candidate whose electability is unproven. Sometimes, the gamble pays off, as it did for Republicans with Ronald Reagan in 1980, but there’s also the risk of winding up with the next Barry Goldwater. Note that Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz, if chosen, would arguably8 fit into the category of ideologically pure but electorally dubious nominees.



Sorry for the wall of text.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 27, 2016 - 05:35am PT
The story of Flint's polluted water supply is a great example of how being poor and black, even in a sizable city, gives you less access to the political system. It's hard to imagine these issues in a city of 100,000 people being dismissed in other circumstances. It's a perfect example of the cycle of institutionalized racism and classism in our country.

More than half of the people who live within 2 miles of a hazardous waste site or heavy pollution area like a factory or coal burning power plant are minorities. Non-whites are far more likely to live in areas where lead poisoning is high. Lead poisoning (as an example) leads to decreased cognitive abilities and increased rates of ADHD, emotional issues and physical health problems. Those kids grow up and are unable to live up to the social and educational standards of our country and we blame them and their parents for their moral failings. They go on to be poor and/or incarcerated due to their issues and the cycle continues.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 28, 2016 - 07:00am PT
Updates:

80% of Chicago PD dash cam videos have no sound because police have been intentionally removing or destroying the microphones.



This is pretty cool. Vignetted conversations with GOP voters from NH and Iowa.

The Strongest Candidate Is the Strongest Candidate
What do GOP voters want? “Testicular fortitude,” among other things. Conversations with 100 Republicans in Iowa and New Hampshire.

This is my favorite:

Jeff Engel, 49, works at belt and hose company
From: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Supporting: Trump

"They’re wondering why a lot of the things that are going on in America are going on — with the shootings and stuff. You even watch cartoons — they’ve got shootings on the cartoons, and cussing and swearing. It’s not like when I was growing up, with Bugs Bunny and all them. They took what our forefathers fought for out of the schools. They took the Ten Commandments out of the schools. And now they wonder why society’s going the way it is. You've got school shootings and everything else."

This one is also good:

Jamie Demers, 58, service manager at toy shop
From: Northfield, New Hampshire
Supporting: Trump

"I think a lot of your social services — whether it’s welfare or EBT — I think there’s a lot of abuse of that, and I think people learn how to beat the system doing that. They spend a whole career doing that. And then they teach the young ones how to do it. I feel that if you're on some kind of society program, sponsored program, like welfare, for three or six months, your right to vote should be suspended — because you’re biased. You’re obviously going to vote for the guy that promises you that welfare will continue for many years."



FiveThirtyEight's 'Polls Plus" projects equal chances for both Trump and Cruz in the Iowa caucus.



Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote another article making the case for reparations for descendants of slaves. He makes a compelling case and even if you wind up disagreeing, his details on the systematic racism suffered by African-Americans throughout the 20th century alone is eye opening.



Hillary Clinton is apparently "intrigued" by the popular desire amongst many liberals that Barack Obama should be appointed to the Supreme Court.



Jeb Bush's superpac is blowing huge amounts of money on absurdly elaborate election mailings in Iowa:

[Click to View YouTube Video]

also: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeb-bush-super-pac-mails-voters-a-documentary-about-jeb/


*edit*

Forgot to mention the first Trumpless Republican debate is tonight at 9 pm EST. You can watch it live without a cable subscription at http://www.foxnews.com/

dirtbag

climber
Jan 28, 2016 - 08:13am PT
Thanks for the links.

Here's a look at Hillary's pragmatism, written by Ezra Klein. Somewhat long, but interesting.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/28/10858464/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-political-realism
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 28, 2016 - 08:45am PT
Same kind of pragmatism as exercised by the Chicago police force it appears.
dirtbag

climber
Jan 28, 2016 - 11:03am PT
Trump is exposing the Republican Party for what it is: a failed state.

I'm not sure that the failed state analogy works, but it should be no surprise who is in charge right now and why.

The ABC/Post poll asked: “Overall, do you think immigrants from other countries mainly strengthen or mainly weaken American society?” Republicans and Republican leaners, by a margin of 50 percent to 38 percent, said immigrants weaken America. The rest of the sample, by a ratio of more than 2 to 1, said the opposite. The poll asked: “Would you like the next president to be someone who has experience in how the political system works, or someone from outside the existing political establishment?” Republicans and Republican leaners, by a margin of 54 percent to 42 percent, preferred an outsider. The rest of the sample, by a ratio of more than 3 to 1, preferred experience. The poll asked whether “America’s best days are ahead of it or behind it.” A 49 percent plurality of Republicans and Republican leaners said the country’s best days are behind it. The rest of the sample, by a ratio of 2 to 1, said the country’s best days lay ahead.

What these polls illustrate is a party adrift from America. By chasing the right and abandoning the middle, Republican politicians have developed a constituency that turns out in midterm elections and believes it’s entitled to control the country but doesn’t think like the rest of the population. Trump is on course to win the Republican presidential nomination and then lose the general election precisely because he mirrors this constituency. The crisis for leaders of the Republican establishment isn’t that Trump doesn’t represent their party. It’s that he does.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/01/the_gop_is_a_failed_state_donald_trump_is_its_warlord.html
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 28, 2016 - 03:20pm PT
a great example of how being poor and black, even in a sizable city, gives you less access to the political system

They don't let those people vote? That's awful. We should fix that.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jan 28, 2016 - 05:16pm PT
^^^

Well, it looks like they had a little too much access to the political system....Lol
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Jan 28, 2016 - 05:51pm PT
Just listened to Leonard Cohen's 'The Future'. Yikes, that song scares me and it scares me because I think that is what Cruz, in his end times lizard brain, wants.

How did a small minority like the 'Tea Party' get so much influence? They don't represent anywhere near a majority voice of America. I guess you just have to repeat and repeat and do it very loudly. I wish the Dems were as aggressive as the Repugs in sending a message; the Dems just seem to fold. Maybe that's a characteristic of the liberal mind; unwilling to loudly bullshit and thinking that actual intelligent discussion can win the day. Not.

Love that Tea Party sign "Use your Brains, Moran". Pretty much says it all.

I'm a proud card carrying member of the ACLU and don't hesitate to say it, even though I live in Yakima, Washington. I've actually thought about running for public office, but I know that a Democrat out here on the other side of the state would get maybe, on a good day, 25% of the vote. And I don't own a gun.

Edit: added 'lizard' to my description of Cruz' brain.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 29, 2016 - 07:16am PT
Winemaker: Here's a pretty decent synopsis of how the RNC fostered it's own destruction.

It was a breathtaking sight. Only moments after decrying the destructive extremism of Donald J. Trump, the candidates and moderators paused for a commercial break and, without even a hint of self-awareness, urged their audience to embrace exactly the sense of fear and desperation that so fuels Trump.

What you saw in this debate was the GOP field and the party's most powerful media institution declare their opposition to Donald Trump, then go about, for two hours, painstakingly maintaining the eco-system of fear that allows him to thrive.

The world as described by the GOP debate is one of a terrifying conspiracy to surrender America to terrorism

If you watched this debate, you would come away with a very clear picture: "radical Muslims" — a deliberately vague phrase that blurs who is and is not a threat — are flowing into this country to destroy it from within, they are poised to overwhelm our weakened military from without, and "political correctness" prevents our law enforcement from keeping us safe. It is a paranoid fantasy, in which Barack Obama is deliberately leaving us exposed and many of America's 2.6 million Muslim Americans, not to mention the billion-plus Muslims abroad, are suspected of conspiring to destroy us.

It is a world animated by desperate fear, in which extreme threats call for extreme measure, and in which nefarious conspiracies lurk around every corner and in every mosque. It is, in other words, exactly the sort of environment in which Donald Trump is destined to thrive.

Here are four of the things that a viewer would learn from Thursday's debate, which, in sum, practically compose a recruiting pamphlet to volunteer for the Trump campaign.

(1) Barack Obama deliberately hollowed out our military, leaving us weak
(2) Obama is allowing terrorists to flow into our communities
(3) Political correctness prevents law enforcement from protecting us
(4) ISIS could defeat America unless we make a change and soon


Those bullet points are distilled from the sense of fear and outrage that built up the Tea Party.

The part of the article before after this paragraph is an important read:
This is Trump's message. Megyn Kelly, supposedly the one Fox News personality willing to stand up to him, went ahead and delivered his message for him, giving it the Fox News seal of approval, all without him even having to show up. But, crucially, before it was Trump's message, it was the Fox News message, gestating and growing over the last seven years until it became a candidacy so extreme it may tear apart the party.


And for pure entertainment, Trump debates Trump:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
dirtbag

climber
Jan 29, 2016 - 07:55am PT
Good Vox article HDDJ. It's a reminder of how extreme fear is driving the GOP. I just don't relate to that at all.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 29, 2016 - 08:26am PT
The irony of the fact that they would have ripped him to pieces with all that video footage but then reinforced his message is really interesting. Also ironic is that FOX went full Daily Show on the candidates last night, playing montages of their contradictory comments and asking them to explain themselves.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Jan 29, 2016 - 08:27am PT
Shouldn't this be called the 'US Politics Omnibus Thread'?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 29, 2016 - 08:28am PT
An apt title! The fact that Supertopo lacks certain common forum functionality like thread title editing is a tragedy.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Jan 29, 2016 - 09:17am PT
Trump-a-Bot

Our new president announced today computer minds were on the way
All connected to the Trümp-a-net I heard it's coming any day
The procedure will be painless I won't remember anyway
Line up for your Brain-ectomy it's mandatory now they say

There were protests and rallies right before they swore him in
And most of his supporters already had an implant in
Now my sacred first amendment has gone into the drink
They took away my brain today I'm not allowed to think

But the right to shoot my neighbor well preserved now to be sure
To determine if their loyalty to God and Donald's pure
And I know that I'll get 'fired' if I don't become a fink
Go figure that without a brain I'm not allowed to think

With my jackboots and my Mossberg and a souped up SUV
With the spotlight and my Kevlar I'll be well prepared to be
Rounding up illegals and deporting them I think
If only I had half a brain I know that this would stink

They took out all my brains today and put me in a box
I'm a mindless corporate minion who would never say it sucks
'Cause now I can go gambling and I can freely roam
The casino Trump erected after bulldozing my home

-bushman
01/29/2017

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 29, 2016 - 10:09am PT
Politico put out an article a couple weeks ago about some of the unheralded successes of the Obama administration. It's a great highlight of what a crappy job Obama and his team did and tooting their own horn.

Examples:
1. The government takeover of the student loan program which diverted $60 billion of guaranteed profits to banks into educational loans for low income students.
2. Diploma mills that have been preying on would-be students have gotten clobbered.
3. The much maligned loan program that Solyndra defaulted on is on track to turn a profit for the government while having financed many of the largest solar arrays in the world. U.S. wind power has quadrupled and 400,000 electric vehicles are now on the road.
4. Medicare's long term solvency was prolonged by 13 years.
5. America's total energy use, which had always gone up year-over-year has actually started going down.
6. He cut taxes for 95% of Americans but because it was cut at the paycheck level instead of delivered as a check signed by Obama (like Bush did) practically nobody knew.
7. The Consumer Protection Agency has collected over $10 billion in fines from exploitative businesses that had previously been immune from punitive action.

It goes on...
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jan 29, 2016 - 02:40pm PT
I wish the Dems were as aggressive as the Repugs in sending a message; the Dems just seem to fold. Maybe that's a characteristic of the liberal mind; unwilling to loudly bullshit and thinking that actual intelligent discussion can win the day. Not.

The tea party has had success in pulling things further right and extremists candidates can win gerrymandered house districts. They have also lost some senate races that would have otherwise been winnable. Hillary is a very beatable candidate but if the polls hold up and Cruz or Trump win, I think Hillary wins in a landslide unless this felony indictment that Fox news viewers keep talking about actually happens. Then it would probably be a squeaker.

The R's are still doing well in off-presidential election years, but I think the right wingers are alienating more of the electorate.

I don't want the D's to follow them off the cliff...
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Jan 29, 2016 - 03:14pm PT
Colbert! There is some hidden (ok, maybe not so hidden) truth in that debate!
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
Jan 29, 2016 - 03:29pm PT
In regards to the cartoons of yore, the ones I remember like mighty mouse, popeye tom and jerry, and many others where ripe with dismemberment and shootings right up to and thru the roadrunner show to mention a few.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Jan 29, 2016 - 10:05pm PT
I agree. But still.at some point you have to take a stand. I'm really tired of the Repugs defining the conversation. Time to turn it around.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 1, 2016 - 06:53am PT
August West posted
The tea party has had success in pulling things further right and extremists candidates can win gerrymandered house districts. They have also lost some senate races that would have otherwise been winnable. Hillary is a very beatable candidate but if the polls hold up and Cruz or Trump win, I think Hillary wins in a landslide unless this felony indictment that Fox news viewers keep talking about actually happens. Then it would probably be a squeaker.

The R's are still doing well in off-presidential election years, but I think the right wingers are alienating more of the electorate.

I don't want the D's to follow them off the cliff...

The Tea Party has been successful not just because it changed the tone of the media and the focus of the party but because they established tangible electoral gains at the state level by maintaining a higher level of turnout during non-presidential elections. The gerrymandering and control of the Senate is a result of that. For some reason, Democratic voters tend to sit out "off year" elections which greatly skews the results in favor of a minority viewpoint. Democrats don't need to follow anybody off a cliff or even adopt binary, inflammatory political language, they just need to start caring about state level elections and showing up on election day when there isn't a president to vote for.


Apogee posted
There are toooo many goddam polititard threads.

Then post in the thread intended to reduce them instead of making a new one!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 1, 2016 - 07:52am PT

Reality is setting in for Nate Silver.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:03am PT
Democrats don't need to follow anybody off a cliff or even adopt binary, inflammatory political language, they just need to start caring about state level elections and showing up on election day when there isn't a president to vote for.

those Presidential Democratic Socialist feel they are more superior than your average JOE they must be too good to deal with people at a state level..

Hillary seems to act like all of US WE the people need her to think for you and I. Bad for business!
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 1, 2016 - 09:23am PT
"Then post in the thread intended to reduce them instead of making a new one!"

Yeah, yeah, yeah....this has been tried numerous times before, and never seems to curb the total # of polititard threads.

I'm down with the strategy, it just doesn't seem to work. I'll nuke the other thread.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 1, 2016 - 09:28am PT
WTF do people think "megathread" means? And it worked damn well with the "Why are Republicans wrong about everything" thread. It drastically reduced the threadcount.


But not the postcount.


Never stop posting.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 1, 2016 - 09:30am PT
"And it worked damn well with the "Why are Republicans wrong about everything" thread."

I'm not so sure about that, but the rationale is still strong.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 1, 2016 - 10:02am PT


Note how every little thing is labeled. Because otherwise it might be too subtle.


Also, the ominous and totally not elitist insinuation that under a Trump administration, unworthy, unpatriotic college graduate will no longer be able to vote.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 1, 2016 - 10:08am PT
Well, that dovetails nicely into what I was going to ask.

Is there any correlation between college graduates/non college graduates and party affiliation?

I never went to college, just curious.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 10:09am PT
Once again, A Republican chooses cronies and money over the health of the citizens they represent.
Who would ever vote for these sold out politicians
Are the Republican voters just so duped that they vote instinctively again their best interests and for the interests of the 1%
You have to be a complete sucker if you aren't a millionaire

This will not end until Rick Snyder is taken out of office
and is this worse than some e-mail fake scandal??
Yes, So worse, this guy and his city managers should be thrown in jail
It's worse than having blood on their hands, they have created a tragedy that will cost billions and the health crises that will take 60 years to go away.



10 Things They Won't Tell You About the Flint Water Tragedy. But I Will

 02/01/2016 11:15 am ET

Michael Moore
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/10-things-about-flint-water-tragedy_b_9132150.html?utm_hp_ref=politics


News of the poisoned water crisis in Flint has reached a wide audience around the world. The basics are now known: The Republican governor, Rick Snyder, nullified the free elections in Flint, deposed the mayor and city council, then appointed his own man to run the city. To save money, they decided to unhook the people of Flint from their fresh water drinking source, Lake Huron, and instead, make the public drink from the toxic Flint River.

When the governor's office discovered just how toxic the water was, they decided to keep quiet about it and covered up the extent of the damage being done to Flint's residents, most notably the lead affecting the children, causing irreversible and permanent brain damage. Citizen activists uncovered these actions, and the governor now faces growing cries to resign or be arrested.

Here are 10 things that you probably don't know about this crisis because the media, having come to the story so late, can only process so much. But if you live in Flint or the state of Michigan as I do, you know all to well that what the greater public has been told only scratches the surface.


1. While the Children in Flint Were Given Poisoned Water to Drink, General Motors Was Given a Special Hookup to the Clean Water.


A few months after Gov. Snyder removed Flint from the clean fresh water we had been drinking for decades, the brass from General Motors went to him and complained that the Flint River water was causing their car parts to corrode when being washed on the assembly line. The governor was appalled to hear that GM property was being damaged, so he jumped through a number of hoops and quietly spent $440,000 to hook GM back up to the Lake Huron water, while keeping the rest of Flint on the Flint River water.

Which means that while the children in Flint were drinking lead-filled water, there was one -- and only one -- address in Flint that got clean water: the GM factory.


2. For Just $100 a Day, This Crisis Could've Been Prevented.


Federal law requires that water systems which are sent through lead pipes must contain an additive that seals the lead into the pipe and prevents it from leaching into the water. Someone at the beginning suggested to the governor that they add this anti-corrosive element to the water coming out of the Flint River.

"How much would that cost?" came the question. "$100 a day for three months," was the answer.

I guess that was too much, so, in order to save $9,000, the state government said f*** it -- and as a result the state may now end up having to pay upwards of $1.5 billion to fix the mess.


3. There's More Than the Lead in Flint's Water.


In addition to exposing every child in the city of Flint to lead poisoning on a daily basis, there appears to be a number of other diseases we may be hearing about in the months ahead. The number of cases in Flint of Legionnaires Disease has increased tenfold since the switch to the river water.

Eighty-seven people have come down with it, and at least 10 have died. In the five years before the river water, not a single person in Flint had died of Legionnaires Disease. Doctors are now discovering that another half-dozen toxins are being found in the blood of Flint's citizens, causing concern that there are other health catastrophes which may soon come to light.


4. People's Homes in Flint Are Now Worth Nothing Because They Cant Be Sold.


Would you buy a house in Flint right now? Who would? So every homeowner in Flint is stuck with a house that's now worth nothing. That's a total home value of $2.4 billion down the economic drain. People in Flint, one of the poorest cities in the U.S., don't have much to their name, and for many their only asset is their home.

So, in addition to being poisoned, they have now a net worth of zero. (And as for employment, who is going to move jobs or start a company in Flint under these conditions? No one.) Has Flint's future just been flushed down that river?


5. While They Were Being Poisoned, They Were Also Being Bombed.


Here's a story which has received little or no coverage outside of Flint. During these two years of water contamination, residents in Flint have had to contend with a decision made by the Pentagon to use Flint for target practice. Literally. Actual unannounced military exercises- - complete with live ammo and explosives -- were conducted last year inside the city of Flint. The army decided to practice urban warfare on Flint, making use of the thousands of abandoned homes which they could drop bombs on.

Streets with dilapidated homes had rocket-propelled grenades fired upon them. For weeks, an undisclosed number of army troops pretended Flint was Baghdad or Damascus and basically had at it. It sounded as if the city was under attack from an invading army or from terrorists. People were shocked this could be going on in their neighborhoods.

Wait -- did I say "people?" I meant, Flint people. As with the governor, it was OK to abuse a community that held no political power or money to fight back. BOOM!


6. The Wife of the Governor's Chief of Staff Is a Spokeswoman for Nestle, Michigan's Largest Owner of Private Water Reserves.


As Deep Throat told Woodward and Bernstein: "Follow the money." Snyder's chief of staff throughout the two years of Flint's poisoning, Dennis Muchmore, was intimately involved in all the decisions regarding Flint. His wife is Deb Muchmore, who just happens to be the spokesperson in Michigan for the Nestle Company -- the largest owner of private water sources in the State of Michigan.

Nestle has been repeatedly sued in northern Michigan for the 200 gallons of fresh water per minute it sucks from out of the ground and bottles for sale as their Ice Mountain brand of bottled spring water. The Muchmores have a personal interest in seeing to it that Nestles grabs as much of Michigan's clean water was possible -- especially when cities like Flint in the future are going to need that Ice Mountain.


7. In Michigan, from Flint water, to Crime and Murder, to GM Ignition Switches, It's a Culture of Death.


It's not just the water that was recklessly used to put people's lives in jeopardy. There are many things that happen in Flint that would give one the impression that there is a low value placed on human life. Flint has one of the worst murder and crime rates in the country. Just for context, if New York City had the same murder rate as Flint, Michigan, the number of people murdered last year in New York would have been almost 4,000 people -- instead of the actual 340 who were killed in NYC in 2015. But it's not just street crime that makes one wonder about what is going on in Michigan.

Last year, it was revealed that, once again, one of Detroit's automakers had put profit ahead of people's lives. General Motors learned that it had installed faulty ignition switches in many of its cars. Instead of simply fixing the problem, mid-management staff covered it up from the public.

The auto industry has a history of weighing the costs of whether it's cheaper to spend the money to fix the defect in millions of cars or to simply pay off a bunch of lawsuits filed by the victims surviving family members. Does a cynical, arrogant culture like this make it easy for a former corporate CEO, now Governor, turn a blind eye to the lead that is discovered in a municipality's drinking water?


8. Don't Call It "Detroit Water" -- It's the Largest Source of Fresh Drinking Water in the World.


The media keeps saying Flint was using "Detroit's water." It is only filtered and treated at the Detroit Water Plant. The water itself comes from Lake Huron, the third largest body of fresh water in the world. It is a glacial lake formed over 10,000 years ago during the last Ice Age and it is still fed by pure underground springs. Flint is geographically the last place on Earth where one should be drinking poisoned water.


9. ALL the Children Have Been Exposed, As Have All the Adults, Including Me.


That's just a fact. If you have been in Flint anytime from April 2014 to today, and you've drank the water, eaten food cooked with it, washed your clothes in it, taken a shower, brushed your teeth or eaten vegetables from someone's garden, you've been exposed to and ingested its toxins. When the media says "9,000 children under 6 have been exposed," that means ALL the children have been exposed because the total number of people under the age of 6 in Flint is... 9,000!

The media should just say, "all." When they say "47 children have tested positive", that's just those who've drank the water in the last week or so. Lead enters the body and does it's damage to the brain immediately. It doesn't stay in the blood stream for longer than a few days and you can't detect it after a month. So when you hear "47 children", that's just those with an exposure in the last 48 hours. It's really everyone.


10. This Was Done, Like So Many Things These Days, So the Rich Could Get a Big Tax Break.


When Governor Snyder took office in 2011, one of the first things he did was to get a multi-billion dollar tax break passed by the Republican legislature for the wealthy and for corporations. But with less tax revenues, that meant he had to start cutting costs.

So, many things -- schools, pensions, welfare, safe drinking water -- were slashed. Then he invoked an executive privilege to take over cities (all of them majority black) by firing the mayors and city councils whom the local people had elected, and installing his cronies to act as "dictators" over these cities.

Their mission? Cut services to save money so he could give the rich even more breaks. That's where the idea of switching Flint to river water came from. To save $15 million! It was easy. Suspend democracy. Cut taxes for the rich. Make the poor drink toxic river water. And everybody's happy.

Except those who were poisoned in the process. All 102,000 of them. In the richest country in the world.

Click here to sign the #ArrestGovSnyder petition.



HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 1, 2016 - 10:16am PT
Brendan- That's a great question. Per Pew research, college graduates tilt a bit towards Democratic registration. The split is larger among post-graduates.

Education. Democrats lead by 22 points (57%-35%) in leaned party identification among adults with post-graduate degrees. The Democrats’ edge is narrower among those with college degrees or some post-graduate experience (49%-42%), and those with less education (47%-39%). Across all educational categories, women are more likely than men to affiliate with the Democratic Party or lean Democratic. The Democrats’ advantage is 35 points (64%-29%) among women with post-graduate degrees, but only eight points (50%-42%) among post-grad men.

Pew's data was corroborated by 2008 polling data by CNN about the presidential election.


Craig posted
Michael Moore diatribe

I probably agree with over half of what he posted but I'll be damned if you're going to make me read something that guy wrote.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 01:25pm PT
Just F-ing read it and get over your misplaced judgmentalness

What's wrong with Michael Moore?
I say he is a critical voice of the people
I wish he would write more pieces like this
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 1, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
It's Brandon, not Brendan.

Just clearing the air, thanks for your reply.

I'll go chew on that (your pew citation) for a while, as should some of the more biased posters on this forum.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 1, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
What's wrong with Michael Moore?

Anyone who asks that questions seriously, rather than tongue-in-cheek, could use a bit a a change of perspective. It would take me longer to pick his hit piece apart than I have time for right now, but suffice to say that he ignores any responsibility for this debacle by anyone other than the current Republican administration of Michigan.

Perhaps he'd care to explain why Flint went bankrupt in the first place, but his explanation would be that "the rich got a tax break," meaning that Flint didn't tax itself enough to pay the bills it undertook. Perhaps he'd care to explain where the EPA blew it, but he'd say it's because the rich gutted the EPA, which is manifestly untrue. He certainly won't tell you that Flint had a socialized water system.

How anyone can take seriously someone with his kind of conspiracy-theory mindset is beyond me. The man is either lying or deluded. Neither state commends the need to waste our time with his rants.

John
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 1, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
He certainly won't tell you that Flint had a socialized water system.
and a private sector operator would not engage in a similar dollar-driven race to the bottom?




Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 1, 2016 - 01:58pm PT
Hey TBC, your diagram seems in line with my opinion, but what's your source?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:01pm PT
Yeah, what gives Flint native, Michael Moore, the right to express an opinion about his hometown? What perspective could he have, other than being from there?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:04pm PT
Does that mean if I tell you what's wrong with Ferguson Missouri, you'd believe me? Pfft.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:16pm PT
The Tea Party has been successful not just because it changed the tone of the media and the focus of the party but because they established tangible electoral gains at the state level by maintaining a higher level of turnout during non-presidential elections. The gerrymandering and control of the Senate is a result of that. For some reason, Democratic voters tend to sit out "off year" elections which greatly skews the results in favor of a minority viewpoint. Democrats don't need to follow anybody off a cliff or even adopt binary, inflammatory political language, they just need to start caring about state level elections and showing up on election day when there isn't a president to vote for.

R's do better among older voters and richer voters. Older and richer voters have had greater turnout than the young and poor for decades, especially for mid-term elections. This was happening way before the Tea Party.

Yea, it would be great if D's turned out in greater numbers, especially if they could increase mid-term election turnout. It's not like the Democratic party isn't aware of this. The party spends a lot of effort on turnout. Without that effort, I would suppose turnout would be even worse.

I do agree that the angry populism has probably increased turnout amoung R's. It has also given them Trump and alienated some moderate voters. It has definitely given them some extreme candidates that lost elections they otherwise could have won.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:27pm PT
Esco, what's up with your profile photo?
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:29pm PT
Hey Brandon!

Just a random web source - totz tailored to fit my own views, so no real metrics apply.


Tell us about Ferguson, Escopeta, plz? For teh lulz
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:31pm PT
Yeah, what gives Flint native, Michael Moore, the right to express an opinion about his hometown? What perspective could he have, other than being from there?

He can express any opinion he wants. The issue was whether the rest of us need to waste our time reading it.

John
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 1, 2016 - 02:38pm PT
Esco, what's up with your profile photo?

WDYM?

I upgraded. Lol
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 05:23pm PT
Flint Water Crises

Apparently, the only thing that the EPA did wrong was....
not blowing the whistle and instead they tried to get the water district to fix the problem, to no avail.
So that person resigned. They didn't do their job by not making this into a bigger deal, since people were at risk!



A blame game has erupted over the lead-ridden drinking water in Flint, Michigan. For weeks, residents, politicians, and observers across the country have been asking: Who is responsible for this public health catastrophe?

Politically, blame is polarized. Progressives have taken aim at Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder, who they say failed to recognize through his state environmental agency that Flint’s water was unsafe.
Meanwhile, conservatives have targeted the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Long before the crisis erupted, an EPA employee sounded the alarm about a serious lead problem in Flint’s drinking water system. But his higher-ups declined to make that information public, and instead tried behind the scenes to get the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to take action to solve the problem.

Now, many insist the EPA should have gone public with what it knew.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2016/01/26/3741139/epa-flint-water-crisis/
dirtbag

climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:03pm PT
Rubio is running strong.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:23pm PT
Cruz has pretty much won Iowa
Trump 2nd, Rubio 3rd
Hillary on the D side

I can't wait to see the Narcissist Trump deal with the loss
heads will explode!!
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:27pm PT
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:34pm PT
Trump is going to go on a chicken raping rampage...Where's Ivana when he needs her...?
Norton

Social climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:38pm PT

Is Cruz gay?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
Bernie is only 7 votes behind Hillary

O'Malley and Huckabee drop out
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:41pm PT
Cruz gay...? Hopefully he is...Then Trump can do his Dice Clay routine and give the press something to gnaw on..
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:51pm PT
GOP candidates are playing us for chumps

By Richard Cohen
February 1 at 7:57 PM 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gop-candidates-are-playing-us-for-chumps/2016/02/01/af514e02-c917-11e5-88ff-e2d1b4289c2f_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-d%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

they lie with abandon and, when caught, double down. You could call it the art of the deal.

I have just reviewed the herculean efforts of The Post’s Fact Checker writers, limiting myself to the work they did following the GOP debates. Hands down, Donald Trump is the biggest liar of them all.

Like his fable that “thousands” of other Muslims in New Jersey cheered the collapse of the twin towers , none of that happened. Neither did a correction.

It would be unfair to the other liars to concentrate only on Trump. Carly Fiorina did very well indeed for a largely undercard candidate. Her most creative and passionate fib was that she had seen a video of a “fully formed fetus on the table, its heart beating, its legs kicking,” about to be carved up by Planned Parenthood for sale of its body parts. It’s entirely possible she was convinced she had seen something like that, but when confronted by the fact that no such tape exists, she insisted she had seen it. The woman does not have the truth in her.

Back in the 1950s, Sen. Joseph McCarthy played the press for chumps. He lied, made false accusation after false accusation, concocted figures — the number of purported communists in the State Department, for instance — and newspapers printed nearly every word of it. The press felt its hands were tied. It had to publish what an important senator said. It could not label a lie as a lie. That was a determination for the reader to make.

Trump has similarly played the media for chumps. For some cable networks, he is a profit center — and they have often covered him live, to the point of exhaustion. The proliferation of fact-checkers — missing in the McCarthy era — has not made any difference. Trump, like Fiorina in particular, never concedes a mistake. He saw Muslims cheering in Jersey City on Sept. 11. She saw a fetus, alive and literarily kicking.

It is not news to me that politicians sometimes lie, but the frequency and blatancy of it in this election cycle are really astounding. This time, it’s not the media that are being played for chumps. It’s the American people.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 07:58pm PT
Well, Rubio has himself a nice little springboard for the next stage of the primary.

He's still a right wing d#@&%e, though.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:00pm PT
Amen. He's Cruz with a better smile. Bad news to see him do well. The $$ folks will rally to his side.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:02pm PT
Yep, crankster. He's the one I fear the most.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:14pm PT
Yes, and don't forget the massive volume of lies that Romney told all throughout
the 2012 campaign, all instantly verified as lies in this wonderful age of high speed search engines on our telephones.

But some 50 million Republican adults voted for him anyway, who cares that he lied..

Flash forward to present day, the new Republican political reality is to double down when pointed out you lied, lie again and lie some more, shows you can stick to something, that you have character.

Meanwhile the world's real time, real money betting electronic markets have either Democrat Sanders or Clinton beating any of the Republicans for the Presidency.

mostly because the republicans are no longer mathematically viable to get to 270
in addition to losing the popular vote in 5 of the past 6 Presidential elections

maybe they could do better if they actually delivered anything of value for the voters
instead of simply opposing everything but the choice of congressional toilet paper
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:20pm PT
The good news is we don't have to hear about Iowa for another 4 years.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:29pm PT
So there are, like, 1300 Democrats in Iowa and, like, 150,000 Repubs? What did Hillary and Bernie spend per vote?

So Trump loses. Does he get pissed off and quit? Maybe, as I suspect he never thought it would go this far. And that, again, means we must anticipate The Romney at the convention to save the Party, since Cruz, slimy lizard brain that he is, doesn't have a chance against either Bernie or Hillary.

Interesting times, but I hope they are not so interesting that Cruz actually wins. Thank God I have two passports.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 1, 2016 - 08:46pm PT
It's hard to tell if Trump is having a bad hair day..or not..?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 2, 2016 - 05:26am PT
Trump was uncharacteristically gracious in his second place status:

"We finished second. And I want to tell you something: I'm honored. I'm really honored. And I want to congratulate Ted. And I want to congratulate all of the incredible candidates."

The right move politically. It sets the hook deeper into those who really want to believe in him.


The reality with Trump's "loss" and Hillary's "win" is that they are largely media events, not technically relevant. The Iowa delegate distribution is proportional which means Hillary is now leading the delegate race 23 to 21. Cruz has 8 delegates to Trump's 7 and Rubio came in "third" with....exactly the same number of delegates as Trump. I just heard someone describe Cruz as "cleaning house" which is complete garbage by any measure. I won't argue that the caucus doesn't establish the first real hard results in the election, but the "wins" and "losses" the media describes are mostly a fiction.

Nate Silver now gives Sanders an 89% of winning New Hampshire. New Hampshire also allocates delegates proportionately which means even a landslide Sanders win may only net him 4 or 5 more delegates than Clinton.

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:18am PT
Trump kept it short because he hates Iowa and couldn't wait to get the hell out and on to NH where he will probably win. Its a 3-person race now for the GOP. Kasich and Bush get a small lifeline in NH, but the odds for them are long after that. The good news is the all-Trump-all-the-time media might focus on the other candidates and Trump will have to start spending some of his own $$. Cruz, an evangelical, won evangelical Iowa. As did not-president's Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee.

Hillary benefits most from the tie with Sanders, even after she likely loses NH. This is Bernie country, 99% white states. S. Carolina and Nevada aren't going to be so friendly to him, or the southern states on March 1. I'm glad they are having more Dem debates. With O'Malley out, it will be more interesting, just the two of them.

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:25am PT
Wake me up when we can vote for a candidate that isn't focused on making things so miserable that people beg for government to step further into every component of our lives deeper.

And you guys eat this sh#t up.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:55am PT
Wake me up when we can vote for a candidate that isn't focused on making things so miserable that people beg for government to step further into every component of our lives deeper.

You can vote that way. Don't vote Republican. Or Hillary for that matter.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:55am PT
Somalia might have its election this year. Pack yer bags and grab yer passport.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 2, 2016 - 07:08am PT
With O'Malley bowing out, the average age of the Democrat candidates is now 71.
Good thing they're not rock stars... oh wait.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 2, 2016 - 07:19am PT
I would argue you should pack for Somalia. You could start your own totalitarian government from scratch without having to work against pesky people who would like to maintain their individual liberty and freedom. It's a clean slate over there, have at it.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 2, 2016 - 07:37am PT
Is it really so hard to fathom someone being for or against against abortion or a gay lifestyle or whatever without wanting 'government to do something' about it?

The very fact that republicans want 'government to do something' about which every problem they see or imagine makes them not any different than a democrat, really.

Both parties are chomping at the bit to manipulate the levers of government in order to form their parties version of a utopia. This has been a fact for years and the product is the amount of government we have.

Neither party really wants .Gov LESS powerful, only to change it to suit their whims or purchased cronyism. Its a shame because freedom is lost whenever the pendulum swings
dirtbag

climber
Feb 2, 2016 - 07:54am PT
Yes esco, you're so oppressed here. Boohoohoo.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 2, 2016 - 07:56am PT


Feb 2, 2016 - 07:08am PT
With O'Malley bowing out, the average age of the Democrat candidates is now 71.
Good thing they're not rock stars... oh wait.

Keith Richards is 72.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 2, 2016 - 08:48am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 2, 2016 - 10:50am PT
The reality with Trump's "loss" and Hillary's "win" is that they are largely media events, not technically relevant.

True.

In any case, based on the emails I received from the candidates for the nomination of the Democrats and Republicans, everyone won last night. (Disclaimer: I have never received an email from Trump or his campaign, and his speech last night sounded like he, at least, isn't claiming victory..)

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 2, 2016 - 11:14am PT
Escopeta posted
Wake me up when we can vote for a candidate that isn't focused on making things so miserable that people beg for government to step further into every component of our lives deeper.

And you guys eat this sh#t up.

You're a more interesting person than this, Escopeta. I just know it. Dig deep.

John posted
In any case, based on the emails I received from the candidates for the nomination of the Democrats and Republicans, everyone won last night. (Disclaimer: I have never received an email from Trump or his campaign, and his speech last night sounded like he, at least, isn't claiming victory..)

I hear Jim Gilmore killed it!
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Feb 2, 2016 - 11:32am PT
The reality with Trump's "loss" and Hillary's "win" is that they are largely media events, not technically relevant.

Huh? As if the fact that Trump has, so far, gotten more media coverage than all of the rest of the R's combined is "not technically relevant"?
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Feb 2, 2016 - 11:37am PT
Is it really so hard to fathom someone being for or against against abortion or a gay lifestyle or whatever without wanting 'government to do something' about it?

The very fact that republicans want 'government to do something' about which every problem they see or imagine makes them not any different than a democrat, really.


Neither party really wants .Gov LESS powerful, only to change it to suit their whims or purchased cronyism. Its a shame because freedom is lost whenever the pendulum swings

So, for instance, we should get rid of all our criminal laws? Or is the government doing something about it ok, in the right circumstances, based on one's particular view?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 2, 2016 - 12:10pm PT
August posted
Huh? As if the fact that Trump has, so far, gotten more media coverage than all of the rest of the R's combined is "not technically relevant"?

There are 2,472 delegates in the Republican primary race. A candidate needs to win 1,237 of them to clinch the nomination. After the first contest of the nomination process, the leading Republican candidates now have 8, 7 and 7 delegates each.

Translated into the media this sounds like:


HOLY CRAP TED CRUZ WON!!! TED CRUZ IS THE WINNER!!! WHAT WILL DONALD TRUMP DO NOW THAT HE LOST?!?!?!??! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOW!!! ALSO WHAT'S UP WITH THIRD PLACE RUBIO?!?!?!??!!


Add on to that the fact that New Hampshire is consistently inconsistent with the Iowa race and ALSO commits delegates proportionately and it just seems silly. There are now maps being posted that show Cruz as having unequivocally "won" Iowa. Ted Cruz is now at 0.647% of the delegates he needs to win compared to Trump's 0.566% and losing third place Rubio's 0.566%
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 2, 2016 - 12:18pm PT
So who got the remaining 98.221% of the delegates????
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 2, 2016 - 12:19pm PT
Nobody yet....
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Feb 2, 2016 - 12:41pm PT
The repug's want the government out of your life unless you are not an old, white, straight Christian, male, and preferably rich. If you aren't, they want to government to dictate every aspect of your life.

Hypocrites
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 2, 2016 - 12:44pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 2, 2016 - 12:47pm PT
HDDJ That went way over my head....they are already looking at % needed to win the R nomination. Huh. Iowa is essentially meaningless all by itself in that context.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 2, 2016 - 01:28pm PT
"Iowa is essentially meaningless all by itself in that context."

You've got it perfectly!
7SacredPools

Trad climber
Ontario, Canada
Feb 2, 2016 - 03:55pm PT
That Randy Newman song is brilliant.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 2, 2016 - 04:27pm PT
Iowa is essentially meaningless all by itself in that context.


It's not meaningless, it just doesn't quite mean all the things they are saying it means.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:03pm PT
Interesting blog on the Flint Water crises

10 things that you probably don't know about the Flint Water Crisis

1. While the Children in Flint Were Given Poisoned Water to Drink, General Motors Was Given a Special Hookup to the Clean Water.


A few months after Gov. Snyder removed Flint from the clean fresh water we had been drinking for decades, the brass from General Motors went to him and complained that the Flint River water was causing their car parts to corrode when being washed on the assembly line. The governor was appalled to hear that GM property was being damaged, so he jumped through a number of hoops and quietly spent $440,000 to hook GM back up to the Lake Huron water, while keeping the rest of Flint on the Flint River water.

Which means that while the children in Flint were drinking lead-filled water, there was one -- and only one -- address in Flint that got clean water: the GM factory.


2. For Just $100 a Day, This Crisis Could've Been Prevented.


Federal law requires that water systems which are sent through lead pipes must contain an additive that seals the lead into the pipe and prevents it from leaching into the water. Someone at the beginning suggested to the governor that they add this anti-corrosive element to the water coming out of the Flint River.

"How much would that cost?" came the question. "$100 a day for three months," was the answer.

I guess that was too much, so, in order to save $9,000, the state government said f*** it -- and as a result the state may now end up having to pay upwards of $1.5 billion to fix the mess.


3. There's More Than the Lead in Flint's Water.


In addition to exposing every child in the city of Flint to lead poisoning on a daily basis, there appears to be a number of other diseases we may be hearing about in the months ahead. The number of cases in Flint of Legionnaires Disease has increased tenfold since the switch to the river water.

Eighty-seven people have come down with it, and at least 10 have died. In the five years before the river water, not a single person in Flint had died of Legionnaires Disease. Doctors are now discovering that another half-dozen toxins are being found in the blood of Flint's citizens, causing concern that there are other health catastrophes which may soon come to light.


4. People's Homes in Flint Are Now Worth Nothing Because They Cant Be Sold.


Would you buy a house in Flint right now? Who would? So every homeowner in Flint is stuck with a house that's now worth nothing. That's a total home value of $2.4 billion down the economic drain. People in Flint, one of the poorest cities in the U.S., don't have much to their name, and for many their only asset is their home.

So, in addition to being poisoned, they have now a net worth of zero. (And as for employment, who is going to move jobs or start a company in Flint under these conditions? No one.) Has Flint's future just been flushed down that river?


5. While They Were Being Poisoned, They Were Also Being Bombed.


Here's a story which has received little or no coverage outside of Flint. During these two years of water contamination, residents in Flint have had to contend with a decision made by the Pentagon to use Flint for target practice. Literally. Actual unannounced military exercises- - complete with live ammo and explosives -- were conducted last year inside the city of Flint. The army decided to practice urban warfare on Flint, making use of the thousands of abandoned homes which they could drop bombs on.

Streets with dilapidated homes had rocket-propelled grenades fired upon them. For weeks, an undisclosed number of army troops pretended Flint was Baghdad or Damascus and basically had at it. It sounded as if the city was under attack from an invading army or from terrorists. People were shocked this could be going on in their neighborhoods.

Wait -- did I say "people?" I meant, Flint people. As with the governor, it was OK to abuse a community that held no political power or money to fight back. BOOM!


6. The Wife of the Governor's Chief of Staff Is a Spokeswoman for Nestle, Michigan's Largest Owner of Private Water Reserves.


As Deep Throat told Woodward and Bernstein: "Follow the money." Snyder's chief of staff throughout the two years of Flint's poisoning, Dennis Muchmore, was intimately involved in all the decisions regarding Flint. His wife is Deb Muchmore, who just happens to be the spokesperson in Michigan for the Nestle Company -- the largest owner of private water sources in the State of Michigan.

Nestle has been repeatedly sued in northern Michigan for the 200 gallons of fresh water per minute it sucks from out of the ground and bottles for sale as their Ice Mountain brand of bottled spring water. The Muchmores have a personal interest in seeing to it that Nestles grabs as much of Michigan's clean water was possible -- especially when cities like Flint in the future are going to need that Ice Mountain.


7. In Michigan, from Flint water, to Crime and Murder, to GM Ignition Switches, It's a Culture of Death.


It's not just the water that was recklessly used to put people's lives in jeopardy. There are many things that happen in Flint that would give one the impression that there is a low value placed on human life. Flint has one of the worst murder and crime rates in the country. Just for context, if New York City had the same murder rate as Flint, Michigan, the number of people murdered last year in New York would have been almost 4,000 people -- instead of the actual 340 who were killed in NYC in 2015. But it's not just street crime that makes one wonder about what is going on in Michigan.

Last year, it was revealed that, once again, one of Detroit's automakers had put profit ahead of people's lives. General Motors learned that it had installed faulty ignition switches in many of its cars. Instead of simply fixing the problem, mid-management staff covered it up from the public.

The auto industry has a history of weighing the costs of whether it's cheaper to spend the money to fix the defect in millions of cars or to simply pay off a bunch of lawsuits filed by the victims surviving family members. Does a cynical, arrogant culture like this make it easy for a former corporate CEO, now Governor, turn a blind eye to the lead that is discovered in a municipality's drinking water?


8. Don't Call It "Detroit Water" -- It's the Largest Source of Fresh Drinking Water in the World.


The media keeps saying Flint was using "Detroit's water." It is only filtered and treated at the Detroit Water Plant. The water itself comes from Lake Huron, the third largest body of fresh water in the world. It is a glacial lake formed over 10,000 years ago during the last Ice Age and it is still fed by pure underground springs. Flint is geographically the last place on Earth where one should be drinking poisoned water.


9. ALL the Children Have Been Exposed, As Have All the Adults, Including Me.


That's just a fact. If you have been in Flint anytime from April 2014 to today, and you've drank the water, eaten food cooked with it, washed your clothes in it, taken a shower, brushed your teeth or eaten vegetables from someone's garden, you've been exposed to and ingested its toxins. When the media says "9,000 children under 6 have been exposed," that means ALL the children have been exposed because the total number of people under the age of 6 in Flint is... 9,000!

The media should just say, "all." When they say "47 children have tested positive", that's just those who've drank the water in the last week or so. Lead enters the body and does it's damage to the brain immediately. It doesn't stay in the blood stream for longer than a few days and you can't detect it after a month. So when you hear "47 children", that's just those with an exposure in the last 48 hours. It's really everyone.


10. This Was Done, Like So Many Things These Days, So the Rich Could Get a Big Tax Break.


When Governor Snyder took office in 2011, one of the first things he did was to get a multi-billion dollar tax break passed by the Republican legislature for the wealthy and for corporations. But with less tax revenues, that meant he had to start cutting costs.

So, many things -- schools, pensions, welfare, safe drinking water -- were slashed. Then he invoked an executive privilege to take over cities (all of them majority black) by firing the mayors and city councils whom the local people had elected, and installing his cronies to act as "dictators" over these cities.

Their mission? Cut services to save money so he could give the rich even more breaks. That's where the idea of switching Flint to river water came from. To save $15 million! It was easy. Suspend democracy. Cut taxes for the rich.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:34pm PT
Ted Cruz Is A 'Natural Born Citizen,' Board Of Election Finds "Further discussion on this issue is unnecessary."

 02/02/2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-natural-born-illinois_us_56b10542e4b0a1b96203f393

Maybe the largely academic debate over Ted Cruz's eligibility will die once and for all.

On the same day he won the Republican Iowa caucus, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas got a favorable decision from the Illinois Board of Elections, which ruled that he met the citizenship criteria to appear on the state's primary ballot.

Two objectors, Lawrence Joyce and William Graham, had challenged Cruz's presidential bid with the board, contending that his name should not appear on the March 15 ballot because his candidacy did not comply with Article II of the Constitution.

Adopting the recommendations of a hearing officer who considered the matter last week, the board of elections on Monday rejected both objections, ruled Cruz eligible and ordered that his name be certified for the election.

"The Candidate is a natural born citizen by virtue of being born in Canada to his mother who was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth," the board said, reasoning that Cruz met the criteria because he "did not have to take any steps or go through a naturalization process at some point after birth."


-

The last word on the Issue??
Maybe, and then I will have to admit that I got it wrong
I said he was Not a "Natural Born Citizen"
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 2, 2016 - 06:34pm PT
Hey Escopeta: Why aren't you whining about the government bailing out all your clones on Wall Street to the tune of about one trillion bucks?

That's $1,000,000,000,000.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 2, 2016 - 08:03pm PT
@ Craig F: Ummmmm, I was born in New Zealand of a Kiwi mother and an American father; I was registered with the American embassy in NZ as 'An American Born Abroad". Steps had to be taken to insure my American citizenship. Did Cruz' mother register him? Action was required.

Just sayin'.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 08:00am PT
Well, we won't have Rand Paul to kick around anymore.

That's too bad. While I'm not a libertarian, he did provide a unique voice in the race. And while he was a bit too isolationist for my taste, he was the only republican candidate whose first reaction to any foreign policy event isn't ready, fire, aim, which was refreshing.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 3, 2016 - 08:06am PT
I'm not a Lindsey Graham fan, but this quote is great regarding these two:

"It's like buying a ticket on the Titanic after you see the movie. You know how it ends.”


dirtbag

climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 08:12am PT
Crump! :-)

Graham has also been critical of Rubio for being too right wing, citing his opposition to abortion even when pregnancy results from sexual assault. It's easy to forget how right wing Rubio is. But I've read some analyses suggesting that is one reason his anointment by the establishment wing hasn't really taken off.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 3, 2016 - 08:13am PT
The thing I appreciate about both the Paul's is that they are generally authentic to their views (unless it's whitewashing their obviously racist policies) and they do a good job of identifying problems. I just generally think their solutions are insane.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 3, 2016 - 08:23am PT
Agree about the Pauls, doesn't seem like there's much of a hidden agenda there. I respect, but disagree with, them.

In other news, I read this morning that some joker has nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize.

Lol.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 08:42am PT
Some interesting social media insight from an Arab Spring organizer. Some might apply, or be applied, here?

Let's Design Social Media that Drives Real Change

http://www.ted.com/talks/wael_ghonim_let_s_design_social_media_that_drives_real_change

Social Media: Destroyer or Creator?

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/03/opinion/social-media-destroyer-or-creator.html?smid=tw-tomfriedman&smtyp=cur&_r=0



How about TWO ST forums... (lol)

... the first a general forum, i.e., this one; and the second a member/reader forum modeled on parlio.com?

http://www.parlio.com
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 3, 2016 - 10:57am PT
There already ARE two forums. Have you not been invited to the other one, HFCS? Yeesh. You're missing some good threads!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 11:08am PT
lol.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 3, 2016 - 11:10am PT
Santorum is out now too. Hard to believe he was still running. I haven't heard anything from him in months.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 11:14am PT
Huckabee's plus Santorum's departures might give Cruz an extra percentage point or two (although apparently huckabee does not like him).

Cruz might have gotten most of Carson's supporters, which at 7-9%, is substantial, except for that stunt Monday night when his surrogate said Carson had withdrawn.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 3, 2016 - 11:15am PT
Santorum must be 'frothing' mad about that.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 11:15am PT
After New Hampshire, I think fiorina will bail.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 3, 2016 - 11:15am PT
I can't even pretend to understand where these voters are going to go. This morning, NHPR interviewed a guy who was going to vote for Trump, Christie or Sanders...he just hadn't made up his mind yet. Americans are amazing.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 3, 2016 - 07:02pm PT
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/03/donald-trump-says-ted-cruz-stole-victory-in-iowa-caucuses/

Wow. That gracious concession speech didn't last long.


Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 3, 2016 - 07:08pm PT
Santorum is out now too.

Well, the Republicans have lost the dog vote.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 3, 2016 - 07:17pm PT
Ted Cruz on Donald Trump: "He's losing it"

Ted Cruz on Wednesday said that Donald Trump is "losing it" in the wake of his loss in the Iowa Republican caucus and questioned his fitness to be commander in chief.

"I wake up every day and laugh at the latest thing Donald has tweeted, because he's losing it," Cruz said when a reporter asked whether he found Trump's insults funny. "But we need a commander-in-chief, not a Twitterer-in-chief ."

"We need someone with judgment and the temperament to keep this country safe," Cruz continued. "I don't know anyone who would be comfortable with someone who behaves this way having his finger on the button. We're likely to wake up one day and Donald, if he were president, would have nuked Denmark."

Cruz responded by accusing Trump of throwing a "Trumpertantrum" and said his insults were growing increasingly "hysterical."

"Anyone who wants this job interview needs to come and answer the questions of the men and women of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina," Cruz said. "He doesn't actually want to talk about issues."

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ted-cruz-on-donald-trump-hes-losing-it/


Tough talk
it's about to get nasty!
Norton

Social climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 07:29pm PT
any one else watch Sanders and Clinton on CNN now?

what a difference between them and the Republican Clown Show.....


there has not been a forum banning for a couple of weeks, what gives?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 3, 2016 - 07:31pm PT
"Cruz responded by accusing Trump of throwing a "Trumpertantrum" and said his insults were growing increasingly "hysterical.""

http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/2758191/Narcissists-Covert-Narcissists-and-Sociopaths
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 3, 2016 - 07:33pm PT
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 3, 2016 - 10:03pm PT
I try my best to avoid ad hominem attacks on fellow climbers here at S.T. Climbers are a diverse and unique group of individuals who tend to be much more adventurous and self motivated than the vast majority of humanity.

Politicians on the other hand inject themselves into the public spotlight proclaiming to be leaders who know more about running our lives than we do ourselves.

Therefore I would like to be a troll today and say:
If my sofa looked liked Hillary Clinton, I would donate it to Goodwill.

The only two man made objects observable from space are the Great Wall of China and Donald Trump's hair.

And for historical reference:
Back in 1990 the government seized the Mustang Ranch brothel in Nevada for tax evasion and, as required by law, tried to run it.
They failed, and it closed.
Now we are trusting the economy of our country, our banking system, our auto industry and our health care to the same people who couldn't make money running a whore house and selling whiskey.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Feb 3, 2016 - 10:33pm PT
Larry: Sorry, but the government being unable to run a whorehouse appears to be just another "urban Republican legend."

It does make a great story, like so many other "urban Republican legends," that are made up by conservatives with an axe to grind.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/government/a/mustang_ranch.htm


Updated January 16, 2016.

Viral story casts doubt on the wisdom of taxpayer-funded industry bailouts by pointing out that the U.S. government seized Nevada's Mustang Ranch brothel in 1990, tried to run the business, and failed.

Description: Viral joke / Rumor
Circulating since: Oct. 2008
Status: False (details below)
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 05:01am PT
Fritz,
Just reaching for the humor.

Remember, there are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Feel free to also research if Donald Trump's hair really can be seen from outer space,
or if Hillary really does resemble a sofa ;-)

As for forum members and climbers? A demographic I respect.

My so called "axe to grind" is the narcissistic ramblings of political candidates lusting for power and an inefficient government that has totally bought into crony capitalism, making rent seeking giant corporations that are too big to fail also fair game.

Small business and the middle class are the poor schmucks getting had by the greedy ultra rich elites on one end and the leisure time wealth of the slacker class on the other end.
That is why anti-establishment candidates like Trump, Sanders, and Cruz are showing such surprising support at both ends of the political spectrum.
How this campaign plays in the long run is how the media whores (another narcissistic group) will get rich. Nothing is objective anymore.

I am really not angry about any of it. I am bemused and entertained.
Pass the popcorn ;-)

“The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 4, 2016 - 05:22am PT
narcissistic ramblings of political candidates lusting for power

Describes Trump pretty well, yes. Actually, it describes the Republicans to a tee. That's why there is little or no policy discussions taking place in their race. Their constituents have no appetite or patience for that. One-liners, only, please. They just want the power back.

And as they have shown in congress, they have little idea what to do when they have it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 4, 2016 - 05:58am PT
The sore loser Trump might just be his undoing. Cruz is capitalizing on this pretty well it looks like. I'm willing to bet a significant portion of Trump supporters aren't going to like this unless he is as successful selling "Cruz is a cheat" as well as he sold "Obama is a Kenyan." I'm skeptical but Trump has a proud track record of proving reasonable assessment incorrect.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:06am PT

Hidesert spreading lies again..


TRUMP did a great job and YOU know it..
dirtbag

climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:57am PT
Geez pyro, he's not a god, you know. Get a grip, man.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 4, 2016 - 07:46am PT
pyro posted
Hidesert spreading lies again..


TRUMP did a great job and YOU know it..

I'm not sure if you're trying to troll or trying to express an earnest opinion but either way you need to start making them intelligible if you want your posts to be successful.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:57am PT
I am having trouble understanding all the Trump WORSHIP

Pyro, as a Trump WORSHIPPER, can you tell us more?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 4, 2016 - 08:02am PT
3 stooges posting all day political crap how is that intelligablllleeeee
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Feb 4, 2016 - 08:04am PT
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 4, 2016 - 11:19am PT
narcissistic ramblings of political candidates lusting for power

Describes Trump pretty well, yes. Actually, it describes the Republicans to a tee.

But not Hillary Clinton? Last time I checked, I didn't find a politician that didn't fit the description of narcissistic and lusting for power. Of course, I didn't find that phrase a complete description of the politician, either, but I find it rather difficult to take seriously the idea that only Republican politicians fit that description.

John
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Feb 4, 2016 - 11:44am PT
John..... +1
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 4, 2016 - 11:46am PT
Agreed, though I think there is a difference between egotism and narcissism. Hilary Clinton very, very much wants to be President, but is also very concerned with building a strong Democratic party and elevating other Democrats (especially women) to further a Democratic agenda. She wants to achieve change through a strong Democratic party and believes as President she could push that even further. She thinks she's good enough and she very much wants to be the first female president. That's egotism. If she fails, she'll keep working to make another Democrat the first female President.

Trump and Bloomberg, two billionaires who love, love looooove naming things after themselves, have not been building a party that furthers their beliefs or ideals and they are not interested in supporting other people in being President. They want to be President. Them. They are not going to drop $100 million to make someone else President, they want to drop $100 million so they can be President. That is narcissism.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 4, 2016 - 11:58am PT
Trump and Bloomberg, two billionaires who love, love looooove naming things after themselves, have not been building a party that furthers their beliefs or ideals and they are not interested in supporting other people in being President.

I think that hits the nail on the head regarding those two, HDDJ.

John
dirtbag

climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 01:16pm PT
Worth a read: how Rubio's criticism of Obama's visit to a mosque yesterday enables and dog whistles Islamophobia.

Trump gets sh#t for his Muslim bashing (rightly so) while Bubble Boy gets a pass.

http://www.vox.com/2016/2/4/10918372/marco-rubio-muslims-media
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
Rubio is not a moderate

He is a hard core right winger that has been spoon fed by extreme right wing billionaires

Just your typical lying hypocrite Mainstream Republican that people will vote for no matter what he says or caught lying about.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 4, 2016 - 01:53pm PT
Hey pyro: Have you ever expressed a single rational thought in your entire life?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:02pm PT
I think Pyro may be is off his anti-psychotic's and instead on a heavy drug binge.

He used to be more coherent, but with more insults that made him even less friendly

His ex-girlfriend sent me a PM a couple years ago

You can imagine what she said,

since then, I try to stay out of his way.

He has said some awful things to me here on ST,
you can't fight crazy
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:02pm PT
Stewart let me smoke some bowls pound some TALL cans and I'll get back to you.. ! ;)


Craig i gots lots of Ex- flames..
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:13pm PT
He has said some awful things to me here on ST,

Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:17pm PT
There are so many flawed candidates in this election.
I'm sure candidates have always been flawed, but the combination of our modern pop culture driving meaningless media tested talking points to the dumbed down, combined with today's catastrophic world events seems to magnify it all.

Hillary will say and do ANYTHING in her lust for power.
Sanders, a socialist, probably never took Econ 101 on his way to a poly Sci degree.
Trump is a narcissistic carnival barker.
Cruz is too ideological to get anything done.
Rubio chest thumps too much on the Middle East.
Christie and Kasich, governors with accomplishments, won't go far in this election cycle where the big loser is political correctness.

Where have all the leaders gone, long time passin?
Where have all the leaders gone, long time ago?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:18pm PT
His ex-girlfriend sent me a PM a couple years ago

Oh yeah CF, some day I'll post up what your wife has told me about you, Dood!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:24pm PT
Larry,

There has to be some credit given to the ultra scrutiny given to candidates these days. Many of the flaws we now see, would not have been flogged the way they are.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:26pm PT
Christie and Kasich, governors with accomplishments, won't go far in this election cycle where the big loser is political correctness. [emphasis added by JE]

Where have all the leaders gone, long time passin?
Where have all the leaders gone, long time ago?

I think political correctness, and the inability of a majority of Americans to differentiate journalism from entertainment have made us the big losers, but otherwise, your analysis is quite accurate. The leaders are still there, but the media thinks the public doesn't find them entertaining. The campaign has simply followed the recent trend and become a focus on trivialities and entertainment, not on policy.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:30pm PT
Econ 101 on his way to a poly Sci degree.

Have You?

Everyone of Bernie's ideas have proven to work here in America before Reagan turned us against ourselves

You don't like Social Security?
You don't like Medicare?
You don't like free education? like we had before?

Name one thing Bernie said that isn't a good idea for this Country.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:54pm PT
Name one thing Bernie said that isn't a good idea for this Country.

dirtbag

climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 02:56pm PT
Is that what Bernie said, hermit?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 4, 2016 - 03:34pm PT
pyro: I stopped holding my breath a long time ago waiting for you to express a single rational thought.

Maybe you should lay off the crack.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Feb 4, 2016 - 04:09pm PT
Name one thing Bernie said that isn't a good idea for this Country.

Bernie's message is basically to slow or reverse income inequality. I think that is a good goal but there is a lot more to being POTUS than that. Like the mess in the Middle East and foreign policy in general. Saying he thought our current foreign policy to be bad isn't the same thing as being a good commander in chief or a good negotiator with friends/enemies. But the main problem I have with Bernie supporters is they are in denial about how terribly he would do in the general. Just like many republicans are in denial about how poorly Trump or Cruz would do. Now if both Bernie and either Trump/Cruz get the nominations, presumably one of them would win (Bloomberg anyone?). But nominating Bernie would dramatically increase the chance of a Trump/Cruz presidency. That's really scary.

And I don't see Bernie, even if he became president, actually getting anything through congress. I imagine he would be less effective than Obama has been or Hillary would be.

But maybe we will find out how a George McGovern would do versus a Barry Goldwater with a serious third party candidate in the electoral college.

Keep your popcorn at hand.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 04:14pm PT
Craig,
I took econ 101 and 102. Doesn't make me an economist, but I do OK with my own finances.
I'm no genius, but I expect the most powerful person in the world to be much better than me, both in brains and in character.
(I don't want cool people doing my taxes, I want the smart competent bore I would never hang with to do my taxes) ;-)

In an economy that is poised to take a big dip as the chickens come home to roost, is this the time to have more and more free stuff for everyone?
Just remember, social programs only work when they feast off of Capitalism's efficiencies.
I like Bernie's character and his passion for justice and equality, I just don't think it is feasible for much of his added free stuff, especially at this point in history.

Points that those who want to hold government to more accountability means that they want to eliminate important social programs are just hyperbolic strawman arguments.
On those points, we need to find ways to save SS and medicare, and it can be done.
We need to reform secondary education's financial perversions.
Over 40 university presidents have pay packages that exceed $1 million, while meaningless BS (the other BS) degrees put grad students in debt for decades.

High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 05:08pm PT
Apogee, you were the first on this site to use the meme...

Trumpertantrum

Good job!


If you had a bitcoin address I'd tip you a couple mbtc for a coffee.



Get out the meme!


I second #TrumperTantrum as the best political hashtag of 2016.



Trumpertantrum!!
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 4, 2016 - 05:31pm PT
Larry Nelson, good post, but social programs aren't the only thing to cut. IMO, it's the Pentagon that's the real waste. Stockpiling expensive bombs does nothing, educating kids, building infrastructure, etc, that produces results.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 4, 2016 - 05:47pm PT
In an economy that is poised to take a big dip as the chickens come home to roost, is this the time to have more and more free stuff for everyone?




What were you saying about hyperbole?

You sound scared ,why,because you know where Bernie is going to get that money to pay for that free stuff.

How was the economy you are so worried about doing ,say ,during the last repub's presidency?
Jorroh

climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:06pm PT
"I just don't think it is feasible for much of his added free stuff"

Here's a little economics for you Larry.

Very concentrated income and even more concentrated wealth = low consumer demand and lots of money sloshing around looking for investment opportunities.

Resulting in horribly bad allocation of capital as investment money chases all sorts of crap opportunities looking for return..real estate bubbles, bond market fraud, stock bubbles and stock fraud etc.etc.etc.

Problems which are compounded by the ability of concentrated economic wealth to translate into political power....which means evading legal repercussions for illegal actions, paying for favorable legislation, special competitive advantage etc etc etc.

Thats basically the last 35 years in a nutshell.

Income/wealth inequality and campaign finance are the two most central issues in the USA by far.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:12pm PT
Two Santa Clauses or How The Republican Party Has Conned America for Thirty Years

by Thom Hartmann

When Barry Goldwater went down to ignominious defeat in 1964, most Republicans felt doomed (among them the then-28-year-old Wanniski). Goldwater himself, although uncomfortable with the rising religious right within his own party and the calls for more intrusion in people's bedrooms, was a diehard fan of Herbert Hoover's economic worldview.


the Republican mantra was: "Lower taxes, reduce the size of government, and balance the budget."

The only problem with this ideology from the Hooverite perspective was that the Democrats always seemed like the bestowers of gifts, while the Republicans were seen by the American people as the stingy Scrooges, bent on making the lives of working people harder all the while making richer the very richest. This, Republican strategists since 1930 knew, was no way to win elections.

Goldwater, however, rejected the "liberalism" of Eisenhower, Rockefeller, and other "moderates" within his own party. Extremism in defense of liberty was no vice, he famously told the 1964 nominating convention, and moderation was no virtue. And it doomed him and his party.

By 1974, Jude Wanniski had had enough. The Democrats got to play Santa Claus when they passed out Social Security and Unemployment checks – both programs of the New Deal – as well as when their "big government" projects like roads, bridges, and highways were built giving a healthy union paycheck to construction workers. They kept raising taxes on businesses and rich people to pay for things, which didn't seem to have much effect at all on working people (wages were steadily going up, in fact), and that made them seem like a party of Robin Hoods, taking from the rich to fund programs for the poor and the working class. Americans loved it. And every time Republicans railed against these programs, they lost elections.

Everybody understood at the time that economies are driven by demand. People with good jobs have money in their pockets, and want to use it to buy things. The job of the business community is to either determine or drive that demand to their particular goods, and when they're successful at meeting the demand then factories get built, more people become...

.... Ronald Reagan was the first national Republican politician to suggest that he could cut taxes on rich people and businesses, that those tax cuts would cause them to take their surplus money and build factories or import large quantities of cheap stuff from low-labor countries, and that the more stuff there was supplying the economy the faster it would grow.

George Herbert Walker Bush – like most Republicans of the time – was horrified. Ronald Reagan was suggesting "Voodoo Economics," said Bush in the primary campaign, and Wanniski's supply-side and Laffer's tax-cut theories would throw the nation into such deep debt that we'd ultimately crash into another Republican Great Depression.

But Wanniski had been doing his homework on how to sell supply-side economics. In 1976, he rolled out to the hard-right insiders in the Republican Party his "Two Santa Clauses" theory, which would enable the Republicans to take power in America for the next thirty years.

Democrats, he said, had been able to be "Santa Clauses" by giving people things from the largesse of the federal government. Republicans could do that, too – spending could actually increase. Plus, Republicans could be double Santa Clauses by cutting people's taxes!

great read


more
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2009/01/26/two-santa-clauses-or-how-republican-party-has-conned-america-thirty-years
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:21pm PT
He's getting grilled, I hope he's got a strong heart.


It's a perfect combination/ synergy: Only an older man like Bernie could go up against this woman like he does and get away with it like he does.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 06:36pm PT
Gary,
You're right about the Military Industrial Complex.
We desperately need more accountability and efficiency there.

Wilbeer,
You think this economy is going to go strong for the next few years?
The stock market is in a huge bubble. Worst January since the 30's?
China, Brazil, Russia, India, Europe are beginning to hurt big time.
We're all interconnected.

So go ahead, put yourself in debt right now because you have confidence in the economy.
Myself? I'm eliminating debt for the coming few years and feel I have set myself up OK.
Not sure how you do it, but emotions like fear are hard to pick up over text communications.
I prefer to call it caution and I'm more focused on the future than on the past.

Jorrah,
I do not disagree with you except on what is more important.
I think debt for one, and technology changing job opportunities, are two of the biggest problems in our immediate future.
Where are the kids in their 20's getting jobs without a STEM degree?
Our national debt has doubled in 8 years and the Fed is lost on what to do with prime interest.
If rates go up, the service on the debt will wipe out Bernie's dreams.
They can't go any lower to stimulate and now seem powerless to have an affect.

I'm just saying:
For every season there is a purpose.
A time to spend, a time to save.

EDIT:

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, "the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."
~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006
Jorroh

climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:28pm PT
"I think debt for one"

Total bullsh#t, I'm sick of hearing it parroted ad nauseam.
Per capita GDP is higher than its ever been.
America easily has enough wealth to provide all sorts of benefits to its citizens.
Where that wealth ends up is a matter of policy.
Somehow a big chunk of the american population has been deluded into thinking that somehow 1% of the population owning 40% of its wealth is the natural state of affairs.
Its not, its a function of public policy and the decisions.....tax, labor law, patent law etc.etc.etc....that we collectively make.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:35pm PT
Crankster

since 2010 when they won the mid term election the Republicans have controlled
Federal spending, they have a strong majority in the House and essentially no money gets spent without their voting yes to it

your graph therefore should be relabeled How Much the Republicans Have Added
to the National Debt in the Past Six Years

Reagan, who not only doubled the National Debt but also presided over the economy
gong into Recession, twice......

anyone answer my question yet?

What has the republican party done "for" their base?
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:38pm PT
The silence is deafening...
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
Our national debt has doubled in 8 years
WRONG
you post so many right wing BS memes that it's no wonder you are so negative

Free stuff ??
You need to get off the right wing media, then we can debate real facts

Republicans want to Privatize Medicare and SS, they want to you to make less money, have less health care

so when it comes to the right wing memes, you seem captivated,
If you were smarter, you would want vote in your best interest, rather than what some right wing BS propaganda has convinced you of.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 4, 2016 - 07:52pm PT
We are the richest Nation on Earth
We could be the best Nation when it comes to taking care of it's citizens

But instead the Republicans have racked up $18 trillion in debt by over spending on the military and cutting tax rates for the rich and corps, one of the biggest portions of our tax revenue

They have no plan to pay the debt down except more tax cuts.

We could easily afford to feed our poor, educate our children and supply good paying jobs by just shifting the spending and tax rates

the whole 90% tax rate that Bernie would impose is just another lie
the tax rates just need to back to the pre Reagan era

The Reagan revolution is pretty much the source of our dismal economy, he made it legal to suck the blood out of our Nation and put it on the credit card for future not so greedy generations.

just lie after lie
the debunking will never be able to keep up with the liars that are making big money using the dupes as suckers
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 4, 2016 - 08:13pm PT
Well that debate was a class act. Proud.

What a difference a party makes.

I'm doubly impressed at their energy levels.
70 is the new 40? They are grade A role models
for us aging older people.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 5, 2016 - 05:20am PT
Thanks for those posts Craig and crankster.

I do believe the economy will do well the next few years.

Especially if Bernie wins.

The jobs report was out this morning,we have 5% unemployment.

I do not look to the stock market and their gambling ways to predict the future.

I run a small construction company[debt free] and look to more tangible things such as housing starts,commodity consumption and employment rates for that.

The only ones getting free stuff are the 2%,certainly not small business or the working class.

The majority is looking for a change with this.You can like that or not.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 05:41am PT
Jorroh posted:
Here's a little economics for you Larry.
I did mention that I am no economist or genius.
There's an old joke about an economist's plan to get out of a pit he was thrown into:
"First, we assume a ladder".
Counter factuals cannot be disproven in economics or social policy.

Jorroh posted:
Total bullsh#t, I'm sick of hearing it parroted ad nauseam.
Craig Fry posted:
WRONG
you post so many right wing BS memes that it's no wonder you are so negative
Free stuff ??
You need to get off the right wing media, then we can debate real facts
Republicans want to Privatize Medicare and SS, they want to you to make less money, have less health care
so when it comes to the right wing memes, you seem captivated,
If you were smarter, you would want vote in your best interest, rather than what some right wing BS propaganda has convinced you of.
Obviously you all take this more seriously and personal than I do.
I'm sure you all are great and fun guys to climb with, but I think it's humorous that many of the angry old white men on these politard threads are "progressives".
Also ironic that one of the only posters here that admits to being a republican, JEleazarian, is also one of the most civil, intelligent and informed of all posters.

My posts are only my opinions. Sometimes I am wrong and I admit it.
I will retract my statement that the debt has doubled in 8 years, and will say that the debt to GDP ratio is not as high as it has been a few times in the past. Correlating it with who controls Congress and the purse strings will show there's plenty of blame to go around.
I still maintain that when interest rates rise from historically low levels that the service on the debt will wipe out Bernie's dreams. Traditionally we have inflated our way out of high debt. An insidious regressive tax on the poor that democrats rarely talk about. The world and US economy right now may make inflation difficult to attain.
I still say the Fed is worried and fumbling on what to do with the prime rate, and we now have a stock market bubble.
I am exercising caution in my personal affairs by moving assets into funds that preserve principal over higher risk growth.
Cash will be king.
Feel free to tell me what I really really think ;-)

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 06:35am PT
US is debt is 75% held by US institutions, and the majority of it is in the form of bonds held by the Social Security Trust. It's not actually as much of a problem as people like to make it sound. Fortunately for Americans, the oft used Republican analogy of the US federal budget to an American family's budget is specious. Nobody is going to foreclose on America. There is no way for someone to call in America's debts. The worst case scenario for the US borrowing money (outside of Republicans choosing not to make the payments and causing us to default) is inflation. That's it. If the US borrows too much money we will cause inflation.

So how's America's inflation? It's so low that for the last several years most economists have been worried about deflation.

I used to complain about the debt but I've learned that it's just an issue that everyone brings up when the government is paying for things that aren't liked. I didn't like that Bush borrowed money to pay for a tax cut or take us to an unnecessary war. We aren't really upset about the debt we're upset about the spending.

Larry posted
I still maintain that when interest rates rise from historically low levels that the service on the debt will wipe out Bernie's dreams. Traditionally we have inflated our way out of high debt. An insidious regressive tax on the poor that democrats rarely talk about. The world and US economy right now may make inflation difficult to attain.

This is a great point. Thing is, nobody wants to go back to interest rates of 15 or 20%. On the flip side, banks have been using fees and exploits on the poor to provide perks to the well off for years. Dodd-frank put an end to some of that but definitely not all. Even with low interest rates, if you can't get a bank to agree to lend you the cash the ability to borrow still won't exist.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 06:52am PT
Updates:

The US added 151,000 jobs and unemployment dropped to 4.9%. Wages are also being pushed up.

The Democrats debated who was the Real Progressive. I didn't watch. I originally thought having fewer debates was a mistake (certainly the timing of them was bad) but I'm pretty done with them. Of course, I have been paying attention for a long time and a lot of Americans are just now starting to tune in so it's probably good there are more of them.

Nate Silver now gives Sanders a greater than 99% chance of winning New Hampshire. Input your Occupy Wall Street jokes here:


You can now use your Apple Watch to summon your Tesla. Baller.

[Click to View YouTube Video]
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 5, 2016 - 06:55am PT
Hidesert welcome to internet of things..

Tesla cars are so good looking..

Anyways lets see how much political junk i can read today..
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 5, 2016 - 07:04am PT
Our national debt has doubled in 8 years
WRONG
you post so many right wing BS memes that it's no wonder you are so negative

According to TreasuryDirect.gov., the debt has more than doubled over the last eight years.

Maybe you should confirm your facts before going on the offensive.

Crankster

since 2010 when they won the mid term election the Republicans have controlled
Federal spending, they have a strong majority in the House and essentially no money gets spent without their voting yes to it

your graph therefore should be relabeled How Much the Republicans Have Added
to the National Debt in the Past Six Years

Sounds good. Let's also give full credit to the Dems for the three highest deficits of all time.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 07:54am PT
Obama is proposing a $10/barrel tax to fund green energy and transportation innovations. It won't go anywhere, of course, but I'm glad he is still trying to promote alternative energy.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:06am PT
I expect trey gowdy and Darrell Issa will immediately investigate this: Colin Powell and Condi Rice both received classified emails in their private email accounts.



http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/fbi-colin-powell-email-probe-218748
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:22am PT
OK
I admit I'm wrong about the debt doubling in 8 years

But to use it as a smear against Obama is 100% wrong

Bush kept his expensive wars and a couple other trillion off the books,
so on day one of Obama's term, he was addled with an extra 3 Trillion

Then the Republican Congress has pretty much stopped any new budget proposals to stop the deficit spending or pay down the debt

They give so much away to the rich and Corporations that it would take a total reform of our tax code to bring it back to a level playing field.

So in conclusion, every cent of the $19 Trillion in debt is because of Republican policies.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:26am PT
So in conclusion, every cent of the $19 Trillion in debt is because of Republican policies.

Props for consistency.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:39am PT

Speaking of the "debt"

it's all mostly because of military spending

Obama is just as bad as Reagan and George W Bush as far as spending on our military

over 700 billion a year, do you feel safe, yet?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:53am PT
Obama has no choice but to accept the budget that the Congress gives him

What is he going do, veto the budget?

That's what the Republican Congress wants...
They want more military spending and more DEBT

The Dems had a budget proposal, they lost
WBraun

climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:57am PT
The whole war machine is what drives the US economy.

You stoopid Americans can't see that.

You think lets cut military spending big time.

Then millions of US citizens are out of work.

The economy will crash.

there will riots.

It's a catch 22 situation.

All because you Americans are ultimately stoopid .....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 10:10am PT
Craig are you just being intentionally hyperbolic or do you actually think that?


Obama has no choice but to accept the budget that the Congress gives him

What is he going do, veto the budget?

Yes, he can veto the budget.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:20am PT
If he vetoed the budget it would shut the government down.

You really think he has that option in this Political Climate?

Yes or No?

Am I correct or not?
John M

climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:22am PT
So many subjects on my mind last night.

Yesterday at the gym I met a woman who was a private contractor in Iraq. She had been injured over there. It got me to thinking about mercenaries and how we are privatizing war. The whole thing just disgusted me. No military code of conduct to oversee these people. Military career not as a service with honor and courage, but as a way to wealth. Kind of drove me nuts thinking about it. The moral implications to me being that we are losing our decent moral underpinnings.

Then I thought about the money Hilary Clinton made giving speeches. Why is that allowed? Shouldn't the position of Secretary of State be a full time position? Meaning there isn't time left over for private work. Doesn't the position, like President, mean its all encompassing?

We have allowed ourselves to become this.

And please don't simply make this about Hilary. She isn't the only person doing this. My post is about the conflicts of interest these kinds of decisions to allow mercenaries to fight our wars, or for public servants to be paid to speak. To me we have lost our way when we allow these things.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 10:27am PT
Craig posted
If he vetoed the budget it would shut the government down.

We hadn't had a budget in forever until Ryan became speaker. We lurched from continuing resolution to continuing resolution. All congress has to do is extend the last budget.

John M posted
Yesterday at the gym I met a woman who was a private contractor in Iraq. She had been injured over there. It got me to thinking about mercenaries and how we are privatizing war. The whole thing just disgusted me. No military code of conduct to oversee these people. Military career not as a service with honor and courage, but as a way to wealth. Kind of drove me nuts thinking about it. The moral implications to me being that we are losing our decent moral underpinnings.

Yeah, this is all pretty concerning. The journalists I've read up on who were in Iraq/Afghanistan largely say that the contractors were the most dangerous thing about being out and about.

Then I thought about the money Hilary Clinton made giving speeches. Why is that allowed? Shouldn't the position of Secretary of State be a full time position? Meaning there isn't time left over for private work. Doesn't the position, like President, mean its all encompassing?


The speeches were given after she left the State Department. SecState is a double time position. I'm willing to bet nobody here works as hard as the SecState does.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:28am PT
Happy Veterans Day? 5 Times Republicans in Congress Screwed Veterans

James Woods | November 11, 2015

These Republicans should stop pretending they give a sh#t about vets.

Today is the 61st celebration of Veterans Day in America, when we celebrate the service of all U.S. military veterans. Originally proclaimed Armistice Day by Woodrow Wilson in 1919 to commemorate the end of the first World War and to honor all who served in that war, it was changed to Veterans Day in 1954 to honor veterans of all wars.

However, in recent years, this holiday has become the ONLY form of gratitude that our veterans can count on as the GOP has spent the last decade chipping away at the benefits and support afforded to our veterans when they return from deployment, while paying lip service to their struggles and heroism.

So today, as members of the GOP stand behind podiums giving speeches in their home districts about the need for more funding to pay military contractors and to give missiles to Israel as part of their plan to continue the growth of “American exceptionalism,” please remember these instances of “gratitude” the GOP showed to our veterans by placing partisan politics above caring for our veterans.

list of 5 Bills
http://usuncut.com/politics/happy-veterans-day-5-times-republicans-in-congress-screwed-veterans/
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:30am PT
The continuing resolutions had the military spending in them

so he would have had to veto the Continuing resolution, that would have shut the Gov. down


Hillary gave the speeches w/o any promises of favors
99% of all speeches are given this way,

who would expect favors after paying for a service?
Only Republicans, it's all part of their GOP mission statement, take money from industry and give them favors so they funnel more money your way



and she is not on the Board of Directors at Monsanto
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 10:31am PT
You mean like this, Craig? http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/barack-obama-vetoes-defense-bill-215074

Or this? http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016/01/08/obama-vetoes-budget-bill-that-would-have-repealed-obamacare

We've survived for most of Obama's presidency on more or less continuations of old budgets.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:35am PT
Yes, like that
Thank God he vetoed some bills

but he could not veto the continuing resolutions that contained the usual massive GOP Military spending,

because it would shut down the Government

Question, if the Dems were in complete control of congress,
would the military spending be the same or lower?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 10:36am PT
He could, sure. He's not going to though. We got large military cuts through the sequester.
John M

climber
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:43am PT
Okay.. thanks Hddj.. I did not realize she gave the speeches outside or her time in those positions. That is a different story and one I don't have a problem with.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 5, 2016 - 11:02am PT
The moral implications to me being that we are losing our decent moral underpinnings.

Since when?

Our military involvement of the last 50 years have been suspect.

IMO contractors have been a necessity in Iraq and Afghanistan because we lack troops. Soldiers for hire don't sit well me, either. But it was either hire them or reinstate the draft.

Of course, we could have just cut bait.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 11:09am PT
Edward posted
IMO contractors have been a necessity in Iraq and Afghanistan because we lack troops.

No we don't. We could choose to fill those spots with US military.


k-man posted
[I'm opening this new thread in an attempt to consolidate the Hillary & Bernie threads--let's discuss both candidates in one place!]

Let's face it, the Democrat Debates are like the playoffs between the two teams who are sure to win the crown--simply, they are the game to watch. Unless the Republicans are extremely successful in suppressing the vote, either Sanders or Clinton will be our next POTUS.

The debate last night was a gloves-off match between two formidable foes. Both threw some body punches that shook the other's foundation.

My vote is still for the true progressive, even though his foreign policy is a bit weak (like when he totally botched the question on troops in Afghanistan).

But, no matter how she tries to look like she is for the every-day American, Clinton still took hundreds of thousands of dollars from Goldman for closed-door speeches. She voted for the military-industrial complex in 2002. Can she really put on different shoes?

This is from his Dems Debate thread.

Electing Sanders will make him the Commander in Chief of the military-industrial complex. He will be required to cheer lead for aspects of it that you will find unpalatable or he will completely fail his responsibilities as President. If we want real change we need to stop putting our hopes in a President and start electing legislatures who will actually support these policies.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 5, 2016 - 07:23pm PT
New Hampshire voters are currently getting robo-calls from white supremacists on behalf of the Trump campaign.

New Hampshire voters may be stunned to hear the latest robocall asking for their vote; it's from white nationalists with a simple, disturbing message.

"We don't need Muslims. We need smart, educated, white people," according to the male voice on the calls, which began Thursday night and urge voters in New Hampshire to vote for Donald Trump.

Three white nationalist leaders have banded together to form their own super PAC in support of Trump, even though Trump doesn't want their support.

The American National Super PAC is funding the robocall effort, which is organized under a separate group called the American Freedom Party.

On its website, the American Freedom Party says it "shares the customs and heritage of the European American people."
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Feb 5, 2016 - 08:06pm PT
If we want real change we need to stop putting our hopes in a President and start electing legislatures who will actually support these policies.

One of the first really sensible posts on this thread.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:19pm PT
If he vetoed the budget it would shut the government down.

You really think he has that option in this Political Climate?

Yes or No?

Am I correct or not?

You are wrong. The "budget" is window dressing. We've gone many years without one being passed.

You are confusing the generally illusory "budget", with the budget resolutions that actually fund the gov't. THOSE have to be passed.

The "budget" funds NOTHING.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:23pm PT
And please don't simply make this about Hilary. She isn't the only person doing this. My post is about the conflicts of interest these kinds of decisions to allow mercenaries to fight our wars, or for public servants to be paid to speak. To me we have lost our way when we allow these things.

I think, just because someone is elected or was elected, removes their right to speak their minds, to an audience of their choosing.

Should they be able to do so, with a market rate fee being paid to a legal non-profit charity?

Should they be able to speak at a political fundraiser?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 5, 2016 - 10:33pm PT
Question, if the Dems were in complete control of congress,
would the military spending be the same or lower?

I think this is very problematic.

I think that democrats, generally, want this.

However, the democratic lawmakers have to understand that:

The MI complex is one of the biggest employers in the country, especially of our engineering base.

It is one one most important MANUFACTURING industries.

It is one of the largest EXPORTS

It is one of the largest EMPLOYERS in many congressional districts.

A massive cut would probably be an economic problem. It should be more gradual----25% over 10 years, perhaps.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 6, 2016 - 08:38am PT
When Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) last month mocked Donald Trump’s “New York values,” it wasn’t entirely clear what he was implying.


This week we got a clue: For Cruz, “New York” is another way of saying “Jewish.”

At an event in New Hampshire, Cruz, the Republican Iowa caucuses winner, was asked about campaign money he and his wife borrowed from Goldman Sachs. Cruz, asserting that Trump had “upward of $480 million of loans from giant Wall Street banks,” said: “For him to make this attack, to use a New York term, it’s the height of chutzpah.” Cruz, pausing for laughter after the phrase “New York term,” exaggerated the guttural “ch” to more laughter and applause.

But “chutzpah,” of course, is not a “New York” term. It’s a Yiddish — a Jewish — one. And using “New York” as a euphemism for “Jewish” has long been an anti-Semitic dog whistle.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Feb 6, 2016 - 08:13pm PT
Heidi & I watched the Republican debate tonight over dinner, although I left it for the last, most boring hour.

The high point for me was Chris Christie making Rubio his whipping boy. If it had gotten much worse for Rubio, I suspect Rubio would have dropped pants and planted himself butt-first in front of Christie.

Othewise, it's the same old bluster from the front runners. Once again they unite to tell us that America is in decline & in great danger from Isis & Mexicans & that only the one spewing can save us from our terrible plight.

Funny how I've been duped by the left-wing news into believing that we were doing well as a nation
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 6, 2016 - 08:20pm PT
Sad lot, Fritz, even when you take into account they're playing to the base. All amnesia sufferers. They forgot what ruin the last Republican president left behind.

A couple on the stage know that America is already great. They can't win on that message so they adopt the crazy stuff that comes natural to Trump, Cruz and Rubio. And poor Ben Carson. He can't drop out soon enough.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 7, 2016 - 12:03am PT

How Wall Street Came to Own the Clintons and the Democratic Party

By Michael Krieger
January 30, 2016 - "Liberty Blitzkrieg" - Former FX trader at Citigroup, Chris Arnade, just penned a poignant and entertaining Op-ed at The Guardian detailing how Wall Street came to own the Democratic Party via the Clintons over the course of his career. While anyone reading this already knows how completely bought and paid for the Clintons are by the big financial interests, the article provides some interesting anecdotes as well as a classic quote about a young Larry Summers.

Here are some choice excerpts from the piece:

I owe almost my entire Wall Street career to the Clintons. I am not alone; most bankers owe their careers, and their wealth, to them. Over the last 25 years they – with the Clintons it is never just Bill or Hillary – implemented policies that placed Wall Street at the center of the Democratic economic agenda, turning it from a party against Wall Street to a party of Wall Street.

That is why when I recently went to see Hillary Clinton campaign for president and speak about reforming Wall Street I was skeptical. What I heard hasn’t changed that skepticism. The policies she offers are mid-course corrections. In the Clintons’ world, Wall Street stays at the center, economically and politically. Given Wall Street’s power and influence, that is a dangerous place to leave them.

The administration’s economic policy took shape as trickle down, Democratic style. They championed free trade, pushing Nafta. They reformed welfare, buying into the conservative view that poverty was about dependency, not about situation. They threw the old left a few bones, repealing prior tax cuts on the rich, but used the increased revenues mostly on Wall Street’s favorite issue: cutting the debt.

Most importantly, when faced with their first financial crisis, they bailed out Wall Street.

That crisis came in January 1995, halfway through the administration’s first term. Mexico, after having boomed from the optimism surrounding Nafta, went bust. It was a huge embarrassment for the administration, given the push they had made for Nafta against a cynical Democratic party.

Money was fleeing Mexico, and much of it was coming back through me and my firm. Selling investors’ Mexican bonds was my first job on Wall Street, and now they were trying to sell them back to us. But we hadn’t just sold Mexican bonds to clients, instead we did it using new derivatives product to get around regulatory issues and take advantages of tax rules, and lend the clients money. Given how aggressive we were, and how profitable it was for us, older traders kept expecting to be stopped by regulators from the new administration, but that didn’t happen.

When Mexico started to collapse, the shudders began. Initially our firm lost only tens of millions, a large loss but not catastrophic. The crisis however was worsening, and Mexico was headed towards a default, or closing its border to money flows. We stood to lose hundreds of millions, something we might not have survived. Other Wall Street firms were in worse shape, having done the trade in a much bigger size. The biggest was rumored to be Lehman, which stood to lose billions, a loss they couldn’t have survived.

As the crisis unfolded, senior management traveled to DC as part of a group of bankers to meet with Treasury officials. They had hoped to meet with Rubin, who was now Treasury secretary. Instead they met with the undersecretary for international affairs who my boss described as: “Some young egghead academic who likes himself a lot and is wide eyed with a taste of power.” That egghead was Larry Summers who would succeed Rubin as Treasury Secretary.

The bailout worked, with Mexico edging away from a crisis, allowing it to repay the loans, at profit. It also worked wonders on Wall Street, which let out a huge sigh of relief.

The success encouraged the administration, which used it as an economic blueprint that emphasized Wall Street. It also emphasized bailouts, believing it was counterproductive to let banks fail, or to punish them with losses, or fines or, God forbid, charge them with crimes, and risk endangering the economy.

The use of bailouts should have also been a reason to heavily regulate Wall Street, to prevent behavior that would require a bailout. But the administration didn’t do that; instead they went the opposite direction and continued to deregulate it, culminating in the repeal of Glass Steagall in 1999.

It changed the trading floor, which started to fill with Democrats. On my trading floor, Robert Rubin, who had joined my firm after leaving the administration, held traders attention by telling long stories and jokes about Bill Clinton to wide-eyed traders.

Wall Street now had both political parties working for them, and really nobody holding them accountable. Now, no trade was too aggressive, no risk too crazy, no behavior to unethical and no loss too painful. It unleashed a boom that produced plenty of smaller crisis (Russia, Dotcom), before culminating in the housing and financial crisis of 2008.

For related articles on Hillary’s long standing Wall Street love affair, see:

Peak Desperation – Clinton Campaign Deploys Strategist for Wall Street Mega Banks to Attack Bernie Sanders

A New Low – Hillary Clinton Claims 9/11 is the Reason She’s Owned by Wall Street

COMPROMISED – How Two of Hillary Clinton’s Top Aides Received Golden Parachutes from Wall Street

Who’s the Real Progressive? A Side by Side Comparison of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton’s Lifetime Donors

Here Come the Cronies – Buffett and Blackstone President Launch $33,400 a Plate Hillary Clinton Fundraiser

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 7, 2016 - 01:05am PT
THE ENDORSEMENT PRIMARY (538)


CANDIDATE

REPRESENTATIVES
1 POINT EACH

SENATORS
5 POINTS EACH

GOVERNORS
10 POINTS EACH


TOTAL POINTS
Marco Rubio 60
Jeb Bush 51
Chris Christie 36
Mike Huckabee 25
John Kasich 20
Ted Cruz 19
Rand Paul 15
Lindsey Graham 5
Carly Fiorina 3
Scott Walker 2
Rick Perry 1
Rick Santorum 1
Ben Carson 0
Donald Trump 0



CANDIDATE

REPRESENTATIVES
1 POINT EACH

SENATORS
5 POINTS EACH

GOVERNORS
10 POINTS EACH

TOTAL POINTS
Hillary Clinton 466
Bernie Sanders 2
Martin O'Malley 1
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 06:06am PT
Man, Christie just nailed Rubio. It was absolutely brutal to watch.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 7, 2016 - 07:22am PT
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 7, 2016 - 09:09am PT
it seems like things have gotten out-of-hand a little bit…





Let Your Life Be a Friction to Stop the Machine
Nightmare and insanity are akin: mysterious and involuntary states that skew and distort objective reality. One wakens from nightmare; from insanity there is no awakening.
Whether Americans live in the one state or the other is the paramount question of this era.
For two hundred years Americans have been indoctrinated with a mythology created, imposed and sustained by a manipulating cabal: the financial elite that built its absolute control on the muscle and blood, good will, ignorance and credulity, of its citizenry.
America began with the invasion of a populated continent and the genocide of its native people. Once solidly established, it grafted enslavement of another race onto that base.
With those two pillars of state firmly in place it declared itself an independent nation in a document that nobly proclaimed the equality of all mankind.
In that act of monumental hypocrisy America’s myth had its beginning.
* * *
A Constitution was written that came to be regarded as American Holy Writ. Its central purposes were to defend private property and suppress mass democracy. It has fulfilled both those mandates beyond the wildest dreams of its creators.
Once the existing oligarchy was secure in law and native people largely exterminated, the ruling class increased its wealth and power fantastically in the 19th century, using the government as its enabler, exploiting to the limit the device of chartered corporations.
With its phenomenal money power, the financial elite began to use the military to expand its sway beyond the continent. Regions, territories, islands, and whole countries were annexed, invaded, and possessed outright, their peoples crushed, suppressed, and ruled.
Because ordinary Americans, like any people, need to believe that whatever the ruling elite undertakes in their nation’s name must be essentially benevolent, noble in purpose and justified in fact, the myth had to be radically modified for imperial expansion.
The foundational story was that Americans had come to a howling wilderness teeming with godless savages and, through invincible strength of character and purity of purpose, had tamed the land and honorably earned the right to possess their bountiful home.
In the era of extra-territorial expansion that version was polished to justify and ennoble imperialism. The new corollary was that America could not ignore colonialist brutality but was obliged, by the Manifest Destiny that led us to civilize our own continent, to carry our mission into barbaric darkness wherever tyranny created abuse and suffering.
A national myth that absolutely binds the loyalty of a people to its government must be a subtle and powerful elixir that elevates and aggrandizes that people’s self-regard. National policy will then appear to be an extension of its superior citizenry’s inchoate will, and the basis for a justified arrogance toward the lesser world.
The simple, powerful myth of America’s altruistic and heroic benevolence, shaped and maintained by the financial/political power elite, infused Americans with a deep and outrageously hubristic sense of racial superiority that, mobilized behind various imperial enterprises, has given all such adventures the character of a quasi-religious crusade. In this way insatiable imperialism acquires the apparent moral perfection of a syllogism.
* * *
With WWII, the world was reconfigured. American Capitalism emerged supreme from the horror that had virtually wrecked its capitalist partners. The Soviet Union, though, having absorbed by far the greatest devastation from Nazi Germany, had astonishingly risen above its ruin to become the leading challenger to America as a world power.
This challenge was not competitive, it was systemic: Soviet Communism was a direct threat to American hegemony in that it categorically refuted the philosophical basis of Predatory Capitalism. Grounded in Marx and Lenin, it attacked Capitalism’s inherent evils, monstrous inequities and flagrant injustices that, exacerbated by speculation, exploitation and fraud, would destroy it. And it promoted world revolution to that end.
This face-off of giants in the Cold War necessitated further refinement of the American myth. Now, instead of simply intervening in situations where despotism or tyranny required America to forcefully implant our just and ethical democracy, America had to become the shield and bulwark of the sacred capitalist system in which “free enterprise” was magically and increasingly identified with democracy and equally to be defended.
This version prevailed through many surrogate confrontations around the globe in the era of Mutually Assured Destruction and survived even the debacle of Vietnam, lasting until the collapse of the Soviet Union, as the propaganda stream became ever more intense and pervasive. On radio and television Americans were subjected to an unrelenting barrage of hyper-patriotism in which American moral superiority was a given, and America’s self-touted courage, generosity and decency were its unchallengeable proofs.
The implosion of the Soviet Union left America, in its own terminology, the “Sole Superpower in a Unipolar World”. This, however, did not result in diminution of the myth. The practical effect of having no doomsday enemy--China couldn’t plausibly be cast in that role then--was to supercharge it by increasing its element of pure, hubristic ego. America was no longer just called upon to defend the “Free World” from monstrous heresy; it was now, by virtue of its universally acknowledged, beatific “exceptionalism”, required to oversee and police it in the interests, and for the benefit, of lesser nations.
* * *
“Power corrupts”, said Lord Mahan, “and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
When the only rival and counterweight to American power disintegrated there was a sense within the American power elite that the opportunity existed, for the first time in history, for one country to absolutely dominate and effectively control the entire world.
This consensus was expressed in a policy statement composed by a cadre of major right-wing political players representing massive corporate capitalist interests called the Project for a New American Century. This triumphalist manifesto laid out a plan for absolute American access and control of essential resources and raw materials worldwide, to be guaranteed by the military which would enforce Full Spectrum Dominance.
The American Myth, which had seemed to have lost momentum and its animating principle in the totally unexpected so-called Cold War “victory”, was now re-energized with a less defensive and reactive essence, and given the glowing radiance and patina of a true and, for the first time, self-professed and articulated, imperial mission.
The attack on the Towers, an unimaginable provocation, was the trigger mechanism for the explosive launch of the effort to impose that imperial model in practice on the world.
* * *
It has been without question the most spectacular failure in the history of American misadventure. After a decade marked by the waste of trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of American lives, the stunning bankruptcy of our internally burglarized nation, and a consequent recession more fundamentally damaging than the Great One, Imperial America has nothing to show for the botched folly of its arrogant overreach but unequivocal disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, with no end of madness in sight.
An impartial observer would have to say that the hypnotic hold of the American Myth on the loyalty of the people has led only to disgrace and disaster, and set a direct course to inevitable imperial decline and ruin. That would be inarguable on any rational basis, but it entirely mistakes the motive for, and the purpose of, the myth. The American Myth was never intended to serve the interests either of our country or of our people: it was created solely to buttress, shield, and exalt the ruling financial class. It has done that with astonishing and unbroken success that staggers the imagination from our earliest days.
The massive looting of Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan war funding to enrich the Corporate Tyranny—for that is what it has become—is on an unique scale of its own, without anything remotely comparable to its flagrant obscenity in the whole long history of war.
Neither the Pentagon nor any branch of the U.S. government can give any accounting whatever of the many billions of tax-generated dollars that have vanished, evaporated. There is no doubt but that beyond the outrageously inflated, no-bid contracts handed to giant corporate favorites with their preposterous guaranteed profits, much of the money was simply stolen in bulk by, through, or in spite of the military, and distributed among thieves and accomplices, some of it on huge pallets… for convenience, presumably.
* * *
While this wholesale robbery was going on under the oversight of the military abroad, the Corporate Tyranny had evolved a whole set of impenetrably complex devices for the generation of money without any economically productive source or result at home.
The sole driving force and purpose of Capitalism is the realization of profit. According to that calculus, reducing production costs increases profit margin. This leads to the obvious conclusion that as production costs near zero, profit is maximized.

There is no provision for social good in Capitalist theory. Corporations, created to optimize business opportunity through efficient specialization, were originally required to operate for public benefit but that provision was quickly finessed and forgotten.
American law courts have always favored corporate concentrations of wealth since they, like the Congress, exist to serve the moneyed interests. The American Myth was created to provide cover for the financial oligarchy to exploit the country and the citizenry, and the judiciary has consistently cooperated in ruling for corporations against the people.
Indeed, without ever considering the question in law, the Supreme Court long ago endowed corporations with “personhood”, that is with all rights of human beings under our Constitution. The way this travesty occurred--the slipshod by-product of an obliquely related case--shows that the court preferred to incorporate this perversion of the plain intent of the 14th amendment as an unexamined assumption rather than risk an eventual test which would unquestionably have created violent public outrage.
Given the collusion of Congress and the courts in securing legal invulnerability for the Corporate Tyranny and the principle that the only duty of corporations is maximization of profit, it was not surprising that megabanks, huge brokerage houses, giant insurance conglomerates, gilded hedge funds and the credit agencies pretending to certify their work, all engaged in massive and systemic fraud and deception for just that purpose. The result was the crash of ’08, the recession, and the stunning and unprecedented rescue and bailout of the biggest banks, investment houses, and insurance and credit conglomerates with taxpayer dollars. So much for the hallowed Invisible Hand of the Free Market…
* * *
The last decades have seen two related megatrends in American geopolitical mechanics, both with dire effects on the power of the American Myth. First, what belief the world at large had in it has been shattered by a catastrophic series of imbecile and irretrievable military failures and disasters, which has caused erosion of its efficacy at home. Second, in response to this, the State has made increasingly crude efforts to boost the Myth’s waning power by the imposition of totalitarian methods of surveillance, intimidation and coercion on the American people to a degree unprecedented in scope and scale.
The whole clanking, medieval apparatus of Homeland Security that has sprouted like an enormous poison fungus since 9/11 with its brutal police state mindset; the odious Patriot Act with its flagrant subversions of the Bill of Rights; the endless, fantasy-based terror-peddling of the prostitute corporate media with its clowns and harpies churning irrational fear and anger in the uninformed: all this grim, repressive endeavor is a concerted attempt to distract Americans from the real causes of their injury, abuse, and oppression.
And yet, even with the American Myth now totally and irreparably blown full of holes and exposed demonstrably for the tissue of lies, deceptions and frauds that it has always been, it somehow keeps its phenomenal hold on the great mass of the American people. The tragic reality is that, for the majority, their own identities have been so deeply and thoroughly infused with the myth that to disbelieve it is to disbelieve in themselves.
* * *
So the American Myth is dead, and yet it lives on in its deadness, horribly masking our crapshot economy, our bankrupt debtors prison of a society, our Ghost Dance charade of kabuki democracy, while typhoons of impending social, economic and ecological disaster build their enormous, lightning-charged thunderheads above the dark future before us.
And what is it that the dead Myth still imperfectly obscures for Americans? What is outside and beyond the opaque wall of faltering, failing dishonesty and deception? What is the horror that the shoddy, tattered Myth has so long and so effectively concealed?
It is the world that has suffered unrelieved exploitation by the violence of our imperialist mania. It is the many wrecked and pillaged economies financially looted by our imposed predatory capitalist austerity regimes. It is the teeming hundreds of millions of starved, deprived and dying children sacrificed to Wall Street commodities gaming. It is the multitudes of humble, innocent, ignorant people, barely surviving in absolutist and dictatorial regimes propped up in their barbaric cruelty by our military while our banks siphon off the profits left after arming their brutal police and armies and bribing their ruling Kings, Sheikhs or Generals. It is the millions of dead and maimed in the raped populations of simple tribal people whom our indiscriminately murderous juggernaut has left in its bloody wake in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. It is the appalling legacy of hate and repulsion, disdain and fear, that America has earned with its appalling hegemonist villainy in every corner of the world.
And at home, what is it we Americans have been so complicit in hiding from ourselves in our devotion to the perverse legend that has come to inhabit our souls like a succubus?
It is the millions of us with no work and no hope in middle age whose jobs and homes have been devoured by the heartless fraud machine of Wall Street. It is the trashed and demolished weedlots of our major cities eroding in crumbling, fire-gutted ruin. It is the many towns and cities with industries shut down and factories deserted or dismantled and shipped overseas. It is our decaying, disintegrating public schools, our bankrupt states and counties, our overtaxed, antiquated public transportation systems, our obsolete, dissolving infrastructure, our bloated, irrational prisons complex, our punishing and inadequate health care disaster, and over it all, the repressive mechanism of our police state, armed and empowered, ready for use against the American people themselves.
* * *
This is where we are. The great question now is whether we as a nation can awaken from this long historic nightmare and face the terrifying and exhilarating prospect of living in the full light of reality without the false props and dishonest constructs of a hoodwinked, herded and dishonored people or, whether we have internalized the falsity and disease to such an extent that it has become an organic, overmastering form of insanity?
In 1846, Henry David Thoreau, offended to his soul by the injustice of the American government’s invasion of Mexico, protested it and went to jail for his convictions. Later, in his essay On Civil Disobedience, he said this:
“If injustice is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine.”
To attempt to break the hold of the American Myth will be a titanic, daunting challenge. To even begin to openly rebel against the might of the National Security State will require the courage to face much more than official disapproval and denunciation. Imperial America will not respond to even the most peaceful and orderly protest with anything less than hard police repression and the level of punishment will rise in relation to the scope and seriousness of the action undertaken.
Small protests will have no effect and will be meaningless. Organized mass events, when they occur, will draw the whole fiercely and brutally motivated National Security State apparatus down upon themselves. Americans, excepting those of our underclass who have felt it, have no experience with violent police or military repression. Those who commit peaceful civil disobedience, a first and innocent tactic of serious protest, will swiftly find out to their cost how it works. In a National Security State that has excised and eradicated all defensive laws and regulations intended to prevent abuse of the public, whatever the State does is legal. To such a pass have we in America come as a result of our long historic indoctrination in serving our financial elite, our Ruling Class.
To achieve any redemption for Americans, to make possible any more just, humane and life-honoring society, will require complete abandonment of the system of Predatory Capitalism. If offers no prospect of reform or improvement and we have all been witness to the idiocy of the so-called “democratic process” in action for generations now.
America is nearing the greatest crisis point in its history and the terrific cataclysm, when it happens, will determine the future our country is to have. If we cannot, in dominating numbers, rise to reject the heartless, mindless, soulless machine of Imperial Predatory Capitalism, we will be condemned to a fascistic command and control horror in which human beings are mere possessions of the State, units of production or service, and then perhaps not even that, as excess population in that brave, new world nay be eliminated.
That end is not inevitable. We are not lost. We are not even defeated because to this moment we have not engaged. We have not honored our responsibility as human beings. We have not risen to defend our humanity. We have let ourselves be ruled.
All around the world the thunder of vast and immeasurable discontent can be heard and felt. In Egypt and Spain, Jordan and Greece, Iraq and Sudan, Afghanistan and Ireland, Latin America, the Far East and Africa, the legitimate anger of humanity is expressing itself against the dead and killing hand of Predatory Capitalism and its agencies of violence. And here, in America, so long trapped and encapsulated, frozen like a fly in amber in a false religion of state idolatry, the anger is deep, widespread, and growing.
It is up to those who know and care to lead. As Thomas Paine said, “These are the times that try men’s souls.” Nothing is guaranteed us. That can’t matter. We cannot be concerned with odds or outcomes. We cannot let the Machine of Injustice grind on. We must oppose it with all the moral force we own. We must act with quiet courage to confront a vicious tyrannical system that is destroying the earth, its life, and its people. We must put our lives on the line to oppose it.
The Nightmare Machine of rapacious exploitation has overthrown humanity’s decency and reason and its bloody inhuman treason flourishes over us. This must be ended.
Let your life be a friction now to stop the Machine.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30620.htm
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 09:41am PT
Ack! Wall of post!
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 7, 2016 - 09:58am PT
well i read at least 50 reports for every one i re-post

if people can't be persuaded to read reports from knowledgeable researchers

then they will just have to thrash around in the thicket of their limited knowledge

and i don't know how to lead them out of the desert of their ignorance
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:11am PT
It's a message board, not a c and p tome board. Consider the audience.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:12am PT
The above link leads to The World News Daily.

Lots of Gud stuff on there. Likely one of Werner's sources too!





I didn't bother looking for articles refuting the above articles, except for the whale. That one was too easy.


The Salt Lake Tribune

Meanwhile, on the Internet

A whale of a tale: No, there’s no humpback in Farmington

Tribune Reporters

First Published Dec 07 2014 05:12PM • Last Updated Dec 07 2014 05:14 pm

No, no one left a 25-ton whale in a Farmington farmer's field.

But "truth" doesn't necessarily apply to the satirical news site World News Daily Report, which posted such a story on Friday, complete with photos. As their "news report" goes, a dairy farmer named Michael Woodson found the 12-meter-long humpback whale laying lifeless on his property, and figured some neighborhood kids left it there "as a creepy prank."

Naturally, a search of a public records database shows no such Michael Woodson living in Farmington.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:13am PT
Holy moly!


Now I want to read that Great Wall of post.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:13am PT
And I should stop ejaculating in swimming pools.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:19am PT
it's called the Big Lie Technique aka a disinformation campaign

used any time a big secret leaks out

you can expect the release of a dozen similar stories that are obviously untrue and outrageous

people can't be troubled to do their research to find out what is true



Americans are oblivious to the truth

When the truth is presented to them, they deny it

When they can no longer deny it, then they become complacent about it
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:26am PT
Not me. I'm going to do something about it. Next time I'm swimming I am not going to shoot my load.

Anyone with me?
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 7, 2016 - 10:36am PT
I'm complacent about the swimming pool incident..
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 7, 2016 - 11:18am PT
The high point for me was Chris Christie making Rubio his whipping boy.

It's all about who can be the biggest as#@&%e.

I've like Christie ever since he rose to the national stage. Thanking Obama for his support after Sandy. Weathering Bridgegate. He seemed a straighshooter. More grownup than most GOP candidates.

His d#@&%ebaggery this last week changed that. Later tubby.

So now, I'm down to Kasich. Too bad he lacks the charisma or savvy to be a contender.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 7, 2016 - 11:32am PT
If I were to vote Republican in this Tuesdays primary, which I can, it would be for Kasich.

John M

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 12:13pm PT
If I were to vote Republican in this Tuesdays primary, which I can, it would be for Kasich.

then do it please. If the reasonable candidates don't get any votes, then it will encourage the whack jobs, and discourage those with at least some sense of balance.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 7, 2016 - 12:17pm PT
Sadly for Kasich, I can vote on either side of the ticket I see fit. He won't be getting my vote, nor will Clinton. I would vote for him over Clinton though, were it one or the other.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 01:18pm PT
Yeah Edward, unfortunately this isn't the election for guys like him.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 7, 2016 - 01:45pm PT
As a registered Republican I will be voting in that party's Primary in my state.

Of course I will vote for the Republican I would most like to see face the Democrat in the General Election.

But I need some help guys, who is most extreme: Trump, Cruz, or Rubio?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 7, 2016 - 01:52pm PT
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/04/exclusive-immigration-committee-chart-fugitive-criminal-aliens-outnumber-all-new-hampshire-city-populations/


Donald Trump say's I told you so!


If I were to vote Republican in this Tuesdays primary, which I can, it would be for Kasich.


Brandon- from Beverly hills 90210
Kasich couldn't even debate last night had to read a cheat sheet..
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 7, 2016 - 01:58pm PT
Rubio comes across as less extreme.

He now leads in the Invisible Primary, ahead of Bush.

Personally, I think Cruz is the scariest.

Cruz answered this way: “As for me and my house, we’re going to serve the Lord…I’m a Christian first, I’m an American second, I’m a conservative third, and I’m a Republican fourth, and that’s part of the problem, is that there are too many people who don’t have that ordering correct.” Cruz made the comments at a private pastors event Monday in Cedar Rapids.

He honestly believes we are in the "endtimes". As a Christian, he has an obligation to advance this, to bring Jesus back to earth. To to this, we need to have a catastrophic world war that wipes out most humans.

This is the man that we want to place in charge of the largest nuclear arsenal on the planet?
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 7, 2016 - 02:15pm PT
Dear God. pyro's crawled out from underneath his rock again, and is making the usual amount of sense.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 7, 2016 - 02:28pm PT
Repeat after me- President Trump. Get used to it losers or face internment,deportation, or execution.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Feb 7, 2016 - 07:40pm PT

He honestly believes we are in the "endtimes". As a Christian, he has an obligation to advance this, to bring Jesus back to earth. To to this, we need to have a catastrophic world war that wipes out most humans.

Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Feb 7, 2016 - 08:42pm PT
Interesting commentary from conservative "insiders" on what they think of Rubio's meltdown in front of Christie in last night's debate.

http://www.vox.com/2016/2/7/10930522/david-frum-marco-rubio

There's much more conservative snarking than just the below screenshot from Vox.

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 7, 2016 - 09:47pm PT
So, why should women not have to register for Selective Service. Military supports it. Many Dems and repubs have come out in favor.

But not Ted Cruz, who thinks it "nuts".

This doesn't put them in foxholes, it simply makes them as available as men.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 05:10am PT
RJ posted
I'm complicit in the swimming pool incident..

FTFY
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 05:48am PT
Less than 24 hours until the real election begins!! Sanders is expected to completely blow out Clinton. It is supposed to snow a bit tonight and it has turned colder but that is unlikely to put off your average New Hampshire voter. Sanders' success is depending heavily on an enormous generational gap with something like 85% of people under the age of 30 breaking for Sanders.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 06:45am PT
Yeah, I'm gonna vote in the Republican race I think. Now I just need to decide who to vote for...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 06:59am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]


If you haven't seen this clip of the exchange between Christie and Rubio during the debate the other night it's well worth watching. Rubio relies heavily on well rehearsed, scripted lines and if you've watched the other debates you've no doubt noticed how polished he appears. Christie does a great job making him short circuit. It's almost cartoonish.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:29am PT
Dear God. pyro's crawled out from underneath his rock again, and is making the usual amount of sense.

are you leg humping me again Stewart read about this BUM..

Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:31am PT
You prefer politicians that leave the senate worth tens of millions? Having a worth of $300,000 sounds admirable to me.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:45am PT
You prefer politicians that leave the senate worth tens of millions? Having a worth of $300,000 sounds admirable to me.

I prefer a President with a track record of achievement and leadership. Sanders resume seems to be little more than getting elected and re-elected.

What has he accomplished outside of politics?

What has he accomplished during the 25 years he's been in Congress?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:48am PT
Pyro is un-American.

He thinks only rich people should be president.


dude America from day 1 was owned and founded by the RICH.. get over it.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:50am PT
Now, Edward and Pyro, don't disparage a life lived tilting at windmills, especially if it pays.
Besides, while that $300K may not provide for the cushiest retirement Bern's Senate pension
will be quite bearable, roughly $110K. Not chopped liver! Don't overlook his SS of about $32K.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 8, 2016 - 08:55am PT
Sure, a senator makes $174,000 per year. Then they leave office worth millions. And you guys think that's admirable, huh?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 08:57am PT
Pyro: So you believe personal wealth is a qualification for the presidency?



*edit*

dude America from day 1 was owned and founded by the RICH.. get over it.


Heh. You must be a lot happier about the general state of our country than most.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 09:00am PT
It's a de facto requirement.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 09:02am PT
It depends on whether you think that's a bug or a feature, Reilly.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 09:10am PT
It is just a fact of life given that it is pretty tough for a working stiff to afford the time to run a
campaign or, should I say, suck up to donors and sponsors?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 8, 2016 - 09:11am PT
Agreed. But is that how it should be? Pyro seems to think so.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 09:16am PT
I doubt it and I wish there was a way to avoid us having to rely on noblesse oblige as the
primary determinant of candidacy.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:03am PT
Reilly, as misguided as your view might be, it's not nearly as meme-driven as the rest of your voting cohorts.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:47am PT
Agreed. But is that how it should be? Pyro seems to think so.

Money Talks.. we'll see what happens..
Did you guys watch Bernie on Saturday night live this last Friday was pretty good..
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:49am PT
SNL was on Friday this past week?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:51am PT
SNL was on Friday this past week?

Brandon- the pussywillow

I used the DVR watched it on Friday.. duh.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:54am PT
Um, Bernie was on SNL TWO NIGHTS AGO! Friday was THREE NIGHTS AGO! Does your DVR have a fully functioning flux capacitor?

You seem to be cracking, Pyro. Maybe try taking a break and reading a book or something?
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:55am PT
Um, Bernie was on SNL TWO NIGHTS AGO! Friday was THREE NIGHTS AGO! Does your DVR have a fully functioning flux capacitor?

-1 for stupid comments
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 10:55am PT
I think a candidate's net worth can be relevant, but only if they're in business trying to provide a service or good that others want. I have no trouble with a true altruist who has little means seeking public office. In Bernie's case, his financial situation represents his view of how the world should be -- we all work for the government, and retire with a comfortable pension plus enough extra to have some fun.

I think most Americans of his age would envy his financial situation. The problem is that if every American followed Bernie's example, no one would have that sort of financial security, because our GDP wouldn't support it. I particularly love how his supporters cite the Scandinavian countries as the economic model of what socialism produces, but ignore, say, Italy and France, which are much closer to reality. I've read at least one study that argues that the economic growth of the socialist Scandinavian countries occurred before the enactment of their welfare states. The socialist policies cut their growth rates in half.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/21463-debunking-the-myth-of-socialist-success-in-scandinavia

What I find more relevant is Bernie's total disconnect from the productive economy. Still, we need to balance that against his sincerity and, to me, his willingness to take on the most powerful political machine of our time.

John


Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:02am PT
as misguided as your view might be

How is a statement of fact a view? There's no value judgement there unless you mis-read
"I wish there was a way to avoid us having to rely on noblesse oblige as the
primary determinant of candidacy."
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:03am PT
The problem is that if every American followed Bernie's example, no one would have that sort of financial security, because our GDP wouldn't support it.

+1 John..
also I read ur email about the Start up thread.. Thank you.. I'm drafting picture will update ASAP..
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:04am PT
In Bernie's case, his financial situation represents his view of how the world should be -- we all work for the government, and retire with a comfortable pension plus enough extra to have some fun.

I don't think that's a fair assessment of his views. If you read Thomas and Harrington you'll note that small business in particular would do very well under democratic socialism. Workers and small business both suffer under capitalism, as the capitalist class appropriates the wealth that others create.

Socialism rewards work, not slackers.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:10am PT

Socialism rewards work, not slackers.


No Comment..
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:15am PT
small business in particular would do very well under democratic socialism.

You've clearly not lived in Scandinavia or Europe - the bureaucratic and financial obstacles to
starting and running a small business are immense beyond comprehension.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:52am PT
I don't think that's a fair assessment of his views. If you read Thomas and Harrington you'll note that small business in particular would do very well under democratic socialism. Workers and small business both suffer under capitalism, as the capitalist class appropriates the wealth that others create.

Socialism rewards work, not slackers.

You must be speaking about something different from the left-wing reactionary policies espoused by Bernie and, say, Elizabeth Warren. As just one thought exercise, imagine Bernie's tax policies and Warren's regulatory policies in place in, say, 1970. Would the personal computer or the wireless communications industries exist as they do now?

I rather doubt it, because the Sanders/Warren policies have a bias to preserve the status quo. The confiscatory taxes on high incomes would prevent the creation of new wealth in new individuals, choking off the capital needed to develop new industries. The regulatory hostility to business would add expensive barriers to new industry formation, and harass any new business that succeeds.

Your last sentece, Gary, really states the root of the intellectual defect of socialism: it ignores every factor of production except labor. In order to produce something useful, we need more than labor. We need, among other things, resources, capital and bearers of the entrepreneurial risk. Socialism fails to reward any of these other inputs, and consequently has too little of them (in the case of bearers of entrepreneurial risk) or misuses them (in the case of resources).

Quite simply, people who a true believing Marxist would call a leech provide indespensible value. If no one spent less than they made, how would we have the capital needed to start a new business? If no one took an entrepreneurial risk, who would start a new business? For that matter, without those two inputs, who would continue an existing business?

I know from personal experience that not everyone wants to bear the entrepreneurial risk of an enterprise. My wife is the daughter of an entrepreneur, whose income fluctuated, so I assumed when we married that she knew how to live with a lawyer whose income fluctuated. Wrong! She would rather have a fixed, lower, income on which she could depend rather than a higher, but variable, income.

I can't think of anyone who is indifferent between having the same total income over time, where one is completely regular and predicable, and the other one is paid in random amounts at random times. Everyone I've ever run across would prefer the former. The reason entrepreneurs get an extra return for bearing risk is the same reason people get paid for working but not lazing -- they're doing something they would not normally do for free.

The same is true of a return on capital. The only way to build capital is to forego consumption. Those who consume now don't get the same return as those who consume later because those who consume later do something people normally don't do for free. Socialism rewards neither of these activities.

The same is true of resource use. If I decide that petroleum, say, is more valuable if it's not refined into fuel, so I simply want to keep in in the ground, I forego current income compared with those who are pumping and selling now. I won't forego the current income inless I expect a greater return for waiting. Again, socialism would pay nothing for waiting to use a resource differently.

In theory, a government could spread the entrepreneurial risk, raise the capital, and decide on resource allocation without the need for those nasty entrepreneurs, capital owners, and resource owners. In a democracy, though, overnmental economic policy tends to be reactionary, because any change in the economic status quo will hurt a well-defined group of voters, who will take it out on those who allowed the change to take place. Those policies would perpetuate the economy of the middle ages if we hadn't evolved into capitalism and freedom.

The genius of capitalism is its ability to transmit useful information through prices. Any system of government control needs information on peoples' abilities, wants, needs and preferences in order to make intelligent decisions on what to produce. So far, no system of governmental control provides that information with as much accuracy, and at as low a cost, as capitalism. Socialism is just one big free lunch -- and there ain't no such thing.

John
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 8, 2016 - 11:52am PT
Socialism rewards work, not slackers.

Must be pure joy working a litle harder to pick up the slack of slackers who get paid the same as you.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 8, 2016 - 12:41pm PT
John, I'm old school. I read Norman Thomas and Michael Harrington and what Eugene Debs left us.. That's what I know.

I rather doubt it, because the Sanders/Warren policies have a bias to preserve the status quo. The confiscatory taxes on high incomes would prevent the creation of new wealth in new individuals, choking off the capital needed to develop new industries.

Wealth, or capital, is created when resources and labor is combined. Capital does not create labor, labor creates capital.


The regulatory hostility to business would add expensive barriers to new industry formation, and harass any new business that succeeds.

Any regulatory hostility that business encounters is because business has proven many times that it deserves those regulations, unfortunately.

Your last sentece, Gary, really states the root of the intellectual defect of socialism: it ignores every factor of production except labor. In order to produce something useful, we need more than labor.

Absolutely. Labor includes more than physical effort. Managers, coordinators are very important to any organization.

We need, among other things, resources, capital and bearers of the entrepreneurial risk.

True! What we don't need is a class of self-entitled accumulators of wealth created by all of us.

We already have a system that socializes the losses, why not socialize the profits?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:05pm PT
We have a system that socializes some of the losses and profits, but if it solcialized all of the losses, the insolvency bar would be out of business. We aren't.

Conservatives are no fans of socializing losses or profits, but I would tend to agree that to the extent the public bears the loss, it should obtain the profit attributable to the share of entrepreneurial risk.

I obviously think Thomas, Debs, et al., miss the mark in their assumption that labor creates capital -- it does not. Labor may be a necessary condition for capital accumulation, but it is not a sufficient one. Saving is capital's sine qua non. To the extent savers receive interest, it rewards their delay in consumption. To the extent investors receive a return on investment, it rewards their taking on risk.

I've never been able to get a useful definition of "a class of self-entitled accumulators of wealth created by all of us." The only way to accumulate wealth (as opposed to income) is to spend less than you make. How does anyone else contribute to that?

Income, in contrast, has many parents, but the mix of reward is entirely up to the individual. Do you want an investor's return? Then invest. That requires most of us to save, which we don't like to do. One of capitalism's many virtues is the freedom we have to participate in the economy. Sure, those who benefit from the generosity of others (e.g. forebears) have more opportunities, but very few have no real choice. An economy, taken as a whole, tends to perform better if its actors behave as if their actions affect their rewards. Socialism has too big a disconnect between action and reward.

John

P.S. Are you ever up this way? I would love to treat you to lunch or dinner and, if you're willing to climb with a known coward, share a rope.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:12pm PT
Socializing profits are their MAIN concern.





"The confiscatory taxes on high incomes would prevent the creation of new wealth in new individuals, choking off the capital needed to develop new industries. The regulatory hostility to business would add expensive barriers to new industry formation, and harass any new business that succeeds."



Well no sense expanding upon that ,there.We just have an overload of upward mobility right now.





Edit;It really is going to suck for the older folks here when millennials start running things in about 6 -10 years.[or earlier]


pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:25pm PT
Socialism has too big a disconnect between action and reward.
+1 john
what don't you want to be EQUALLY POOR..!?!
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:26pm PT
The only way to accumulate wealth (as opposed to income) is to spend less than you make. How does anyone else contribute to that?

Because unless you start with a small fortune, the best, possibly only way to make a large fortune, is to have others do the work!

Capitalism is no more or less flawed than any other -ism, except pragmatism.

TE
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:28pm PT
Because unless you start with a small fortune, the best, possibly only way to make a large fortune, is to have others do the work!

WRONG I started with nada and NOW I'm thinking of a start-up go figure..
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:37pm PT
Let us know when you have a Large Fortune .


Till then,that Ice needs cleaned and I am building a roof.

Remember Labor does not create wealth![or a necessary condition for capitol accumulation ]


Well said TradEddie.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 8, 2016 - 01:57pm PT
We have a system that socializes some of the losses and profits, but if it solcialized all of the losses, the insolvency bar would be out of business. We aren't.

True, we do not socialize all losses. Only the losses of the 0.1%.

Conservatives are no fans of socializing losses or profits, but I would tend to agree that to the extent the public bears the loss, it should obtain the profit attributable to the share of entrepreneurial risk.

Well, we're not talking about conservatives, we're talking about the big money boys that call teh shots on Wall Street and in Washington.

I obviously think Thomas, Debs, et al., miss the mark in their assumption that labor creates capital -- it does not.

My favorite Republican president, and fellow Hoosier, would disagree:
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

...
I've never been able to get a useful definition of "a class of self-entitled accumulators of wealth created by all of us." The only way to accumulate wealth (as opposed to income) is to spend less than you make. How does anyone else contribute to that?
Another way to accumulate wealth is to steal it.



... Socialism has too big a disconnect between action and reward.

This is where we disconnect, I guess. It is capitalism that has too big a disconnect between action and reward.

P.S. Are you ever up this way? I would love to treat you to lunch or dinner and, if you're willing to climb with a known coward, share a rope.

Ha! I can see us taking the whole day trying to talk each other into taking the sharp end.

I don't get that way much, but a friend wants to go climb at The Balls. He's knows his way around there. He could rope gun for us. If that ever happens, I'll shoot you a PM. It'd be fun.
Sparky

Trad climber
vagabond movin on
Feb 8, 2016 - 02:27pm PT
You must be speaking about something different from the left-wing reactionary policies espoused by Bernie and, say, Elizabeth Warren. As just one thought exercise, imagine Bernie's tax policies and Warren's regulatory policies in place in, say, 1970. Would the personal computer or the wireless communications industries exist as they do now?

FDR's policies to help build up the middle class are really not much different than what Bernie and Warren are proposing. Gee, I wonder what inventions took place from 1945 to 1978 before some silly policies by Carter and ridiculous polices of Reagan started stripping the middle class....not much change there. Inventions were not stifled.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_inventions_(1946%E2%80%9391)
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 03:12pm PT
Inventions were not stifled.





They will be,sort of like ,Death Panels or better yet ,taking all your guns.

You know that is all the opposition has to Bernie's plans.

Install Fear.

That is it.

One may notice that rarely do you hear that Obama is a Socialist anymore.

It was the rights call of duty to call O's policies ,Socialist.

That is until 4.9% unemployment presented itself.

Yes things are so bad,now.http://reverbpress.com/politics/economics/economist-says-median-income-and-jobs-would-soar-under-a-president-sanders/
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 8, 2016 - 03:35pm PT
pyro: Gee... what devastating use of someone else's propaganda. Glad to see that your lobotomy was a success, though.

Yeah - the U.S. would definitely be a better place to live in if your hero Trump - a racist, mysogynistic, four-time bankrupt bully managed to ooze into the Oval Office.

By the way, what makes you think I would want to hump your leg? If I was into that kind of behaviour, we've got sewer rats up here that are infinitely more attractive as prospective partners than you.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 8, 2016 - 05:42pm PT
That's it Stewart. I'm turning you in to PETA

Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 8, 2016 - 05:47pm PT
rick: You should probably call them off. I said "If".
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:00pm PT

170 Economists.......170.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/14/170-economists-bernie-sanders-plan-reform-wall-st-rein-greed.html
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:10pm PT
You must feel better now ,Aye?
Norton

Social climber
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:14pm PT

Gee

And I vote Republican because of the three G's

God

Guns

Gays


Everything else is all lies and copied off the internet
Jorroh

climber
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:18pm PT
JElezarian...
"In Bernie's case, his financial situation represents his view of how the world should be -- we all work for the government"

John, congratulations on graduating to straw men fallacies....you had a good, long run with "look ma they're doing it too", but it was really starting to get quite comical.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:18pm PT
I give you a lot of credit Cosmic,that is at least 6 more issues than Trump has mentioned.



Oh......EVER!
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:26pm PT
cosmiccragsman: Nice to know that your paranoid fairyland puts me into the middle of a conspiracy. Crankster, Dr, F. & I have never exchanged emails of any sort, nor have we collaborated to post such ludicrous comments.

When you finally sober up enough to form organized thinking patterns, feel free to write this down:

I stand by my opinions, and anything I claim to be factual information can be verified.

Oh, yeah here's a couple of FACTS:

1) I have owned guns, and I'm a pretty good shot. I don't own one at present because I'm worried that someone might steal it and use it in a crime, or perhaps a child might get his hands on it and accidentally kill himself or someone else.

2) I don't vote Democrat, mainly because I'm Canadian.

Idiot.
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 8, 2016 - 06:59pm PT
So, let me be clear, Trump says waterboarding and even more extreme forms of torture are okay, as long as he 'declassifies' them as president? The Geneva Convention is just sort of a nice idea, but doesn't apply to us? So other countries can just, sort of, ignore it? And if they ignore it and torture captured American soldiers, it's okay as long as they 'declassify' it? Have I got it right? At least Cruz, whom I loathe, has some doubts about this. Has the American public really become so dulled by television and movie maiming, death, destruction, and torture that they now accept the fantasy of a script writer as reality? Sorry, I shouldn't have to ask, as I know the answer. What has happened to the moral and ethical teachings of Christianity? This country was founded by Deists, not evangelicals, and their values seem more moral than what I see hard core Christian right wing weirdos believing. WTF? I am concerned for this country.

rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 8, 2016 - 07:18pm PT
Bravo Cosmic. You nailed it. A real tour-de-force.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 8, 2016 - 07:36pm PT
Hey, Cosmic, could you spend a few minutes and innumerate the accomplishments of the last Republican administration? How about a chapter on the current Republican congress (both houses)?

If Trump get the nomination and you vote for him I don't think it will be your proudest day. Not that it will matter in CA.

I'm just a guy who happens to support the current President of the United States and thinks the country we live in is great already. Makes me a crazy guy in some campfires, it appears.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 8, 2016 - 07:41pm PT
Cosmic been dippin' into that synthetic weed
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 05:14am PT
John posted
particularly love how his supporters cite the Scandinavian countries as the economic model of what socialism produces, but ignore, say, Italy and France, which are much closer to reality. I've read at least one study that argues that the economic growth of the socialist Scandinavian countries occurred before the enactment of their welfare states. The socialist policies cut their growth rates in half.

And yet many (all?) of those countries rank higher than America in entrepreneurial opportunity. GDP increases are not actually a measurement of human happiness. We could force people over the age of 65 to work 40 hours a week and the GDP would skyrocket. Climbers, of all people, should easily be able to understand that maximizing quantifiable economic productivity is not the core expression of human existence.


Noted socialist rag, Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/best-countries-for-business/list/#tab:overall

Best Countries for Business

#1 Denmark 1.1% $44,600 6.3% 5.6 M
#2 New Zealand 3.3% $35,300 -3.2% 4.4 M
#3 Norway 2.2% $67,200 9.4% 5.2 M
#4 Ireland 5.2% $51,300 3.7% 4.9 M
#5 Sweden 2.3% $46,200 6.2% 9.8 M
#6 Finland -0.4% $40,700 -1.8% 5.5 M
#7 Canada 2.4% $45,000 -2.1% 35.1 M
#8 Singapore 2.9% $83,100 19.1% 5.7 M
#9 Netherlands 1% $48,000 10.4% 16.9 M
#10 United Kingdom 3% $39,800 -5.9% 64.1 M
#11 Hong Kong 2.5% $55,100 1.9% 7.1 M
#12 Switzerland 1.9% $58,100 7.2% 8.1 M
#13 Iceland 1.8% $44,000 3.6% 0.3 M
#14 Australia 2.7% $46,600 -3% 22.8 M
#15 Belgium 1.1% $43,100 1.6% 11.3 M
#16 Portugal 0.9% $27,100 0.6% 10.8 M
#17 Lithuania 3% $27,300 0.1% 2.9 M
#18 Germany 1.6% $46,200 7.4% 80.9 M
#19 Estonia 2.9% $27,900 0.1% 1.3 M
#20 Slovenia 3% $29,900 6.9% 2 M

America doesn't even make the top 20. "Our corporate taxes are too high" you'll say. Yeah but our effective tax rate is lower than all of them. If you want to lower our corporate tax rate and also adopt the social protections that literally every single one of those countries has you'll get no arguments from Democrats.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 05:24am PT
Somewhere between 30-50% of NH GOP voters still haven't made up their minds who to vote for. Today could be interesting.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 9, 2016 - 06:23am PT
NH is the graveyard of predictions, but here's mine, anyway:

Bernie and his supporters get a party. Better enjoy it now.
Hillary gets bruised. Lives to see (and win) another day. Advise: Be gracious.

Trump wins but not by as wide a margin as predicted. Stupid is in decline.
Kasich has a good night. One of the last.
Marcobot underachieves. System gets a re-boot.
Cruz and Bush fight it out for 4th. Cruz still talks for an hour.
Fiorina finally disappears. Carson already has, but wanders south.

Meanwhile, minority voters await.

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 9, 2016 - 06:33am PT
Nice summary, Crankster.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 9, 2016 - 06:52am PT
Hillary... Advice: Be gracious.

Spot on.
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Feb 9, 2016 - 07:11am PT
Are you guys ready to lose to a socialist or a woman?

Ho ho ho.


Get. Used. To. It. Losers.


( we sent trump to skuttle your ship of fools. He's our monkey and he'll say what we tell him to say.)
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 07:12am PT
Good summary, crank.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 9, 2016 - 07:22am PT

can't get to 270
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 9, 2016 - 07:58am PT
12. I voted Democratic because my head is so firmly misplaced toward the south end of my body, it’s unlikely that I’ll ever have another point of view.

+100000000 cosmic.. lol perfect


Oh, yeah here's a couple of FACTS:

1) I have owned guns, and I'm a pretty good shot. I don't own one at present because I'm worried that someone might steal it and use it in a crime, or perhaps a child might get his hands on it and accidentally kill himself or someone else.

2) I don't vote Democrat, mainly because I'm Canadian TROLL


stewart you better go call MOMmy and Daddy..
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 9, 2016 - 08:08am PT
Just got back from voting. I'm pretty stoked to not be getting a dozen or more phone calls from politicians campaigns every day.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 08:35am PT
I got a robocall from some anti-semite last night. Never heard of him. Very weird.


Here's a thing that happened: http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/hes-possessed-by-a-demon-man-attempts-exorcism-on-ted-cruz-during-campaign-event/
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 9, 2016 - 10:13am PT
I suspect you're right, crankster, but my prediction about New Hampshire is closer to J. P. Morgan's prediction about the stock market (when asked, he responded "It will fluctuate.") With so large an undecided Republican electorate, and the role of independents in the New Hampshire primary, any prediction on the Republican outcome has a very broad confidence interval.

John
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 9, 2016 - 10:18am PT
"can't get to 270"

Worth repeating

And understanding
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 9, 2016 - 10:35am PT
John,

As always, I find your postings thoughtful, and backed by careful evaluation.

Where I think your argument fails, as it does for the socialists, is that it casts things in the extreme.

Where I come down, is in the middle. There are some things that are just BETTER when they are handled in a socialist manner. Fire Dept's are a good example. There was the recent example of the private fire dept, contracted by individuals in a community, where one who didn't contract had their home become alight. The fire dept stood there and watched it burn to the ground, with no concern other than to make sure it did not spread to it's subscribers.

Free enterprise at it's best.

We used to have much higher indivicual tax rates at the highest levels---90% if memory serves. During that time, I don't recall that business growth did not occur. That was partially during Reagan.

On the other hand, I don't believe that you believe in no safety net, at all. "Let them starve in the streets".

I think the problem is that there is little discourse towards the reasonable center.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 9, 2016 - 01:57pm PT
pyro: You certainly have no trouble proving what a stupid prick you are, but can you at least ONCE in your twisted existence try to make a sensible comment? Or is this something to do with your lobotomy?

Please attempt to stay in at least occasional contact with reality.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 9, 2016 - 02:49pm PT
Ken, I agree. The argument to which I was responding is the classical socialist arguments of Thomas, Debs, et al., that capitalists are leeches stealing from the product of laborers.

In general, market economists would expect government to be the optimal provider of goods or services when the following hold true:

1. The good or service is a public good, meaning that there is no demand (in the economic sense, meaning that no one will pay for it) because there is no effective ability to exclude those who don't pay. Defense, police, etc. are good examples.

2. The good or service is a merit good, meaning that the society believes that everyone is entitled to a certain minimal amount, regardless of ability or willingness to pay. Basic necessities of life come to mind.

3. The good or service has an external benefit, meaning that people other than the payor benefit from provision of the good or service. Fire protection (because it prevents a fire from spreading), mosquito abatement, education (because it provides a more infored [if you're an optimist] - or at least less misinformed [if you're a pessimist] electorate, and provides a workforce able to be more productive), and cleaner air and water are examples.

As usual, the real issue is what to do with the fringes. Markets allocate goods and services imperfectly. So does government. We usually end up comparing imperfections.

Again, the arguments I made above were referring to the economic analysis and consequent policy prescriptions of Norman Thomas and Eugene Debs, among others, and was directed primarily at one of Gary's posts (and I consider Gary a friend and worthy intellectual opponent, even though we have yet to meet in person). I never intended them to mean that government should undertake no economic activity.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 04:00pm PT
1 minute until polls close, turnout has been high and apparently Republican voters were pretty late in making a decision with 50% deciding at the last minute. This is going to be really interesting (and not good for Trump).
WBraun

climber
Feb 9, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
Quarkloons and quackloons will be sent to swim in the Flint Michigan pond.

The Quackulator will join the Putinator to save the world from all the loons .....
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 9, 2016 - 04:36pm PT
^^^^^^too funny. The Quackulator is one of ST'S greatest.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Feb 9, 2016 - 04:39pm PT
Is that before or after they chug the water?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 05:46pm PT
Looks like the exit polls were definitive enough for the AP to call right at closing. Probably won't know until really late tonight what the margins look like.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 9, 2016 - 06:29pm PT
T Hocking: I can't believe that you're so proud of your ignorance that you'd post it on two separate threads.

Politics may suck, but the only way thinks will get better is if people like you get off their asses and get out and vote for a better alternative to whatever you so dislike about the status quo.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 9, 2016 - 06:37pm PT
Rubio is currently in 5th place.
Rubio is currently in 5th place.
Rubio is currently in 5th place.
Rubio is currently in 5th place.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 9, 2016 - 06:58pm PT
Kasich coming in second. I've been waiting for him to pull through. This is his big chance and I bet the RNC pounces.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 9, 2016 - 07:02pm PT
Fritz probably gots a big bonfire going up in Choss Creek over the Kasich news snarkiness be damned...
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 9, 2016 - 08:37pm PT
Interesting about Sanders and Trump.

HOWEVER, they are on two different trajectories.

As do some others, I think 538 has some of the more interesting information:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/south-carolina-republican/

As you look at the various upcoming primaries, Trump actually predicts out very well.

However, Sanders gets Berned.

Of course, things change, and we actually have to have the voting.

But it is starting down a path that looks very possible for Hillary/Donald.
Sparky

Trad climber
vagabond movin on
Feb 9, 2016 - 08:57pm PT
Yeah, cause their Iowa prediction was spot on....

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-democratic/

Brace yourselves people....

Bernie Sanders is bringing real truth to the white house.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 9, 2016 - 09:03pm PT
T Hocking - what made me believe you weren't planning to vote was the misleading nature of your post.

Nevertheless, I'll apologize.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 10, 2016 - 12:21am PT
“If what we are combating is, as I posit, essentially two (or more) gangs competing for turf, then it is self-evident that we gain nothing from supporting one gang over another other than the vague hope that the other gang will treat us more kindly.

“The real solution to centralized, hierarchical international institutions created by and for the interests of the oligarchical elite are decentralized, non-hierarchical relations created by and for the grassroots.”
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 10, 2016 - 05:28am PT
Christie is almost certainly out of the race. Kasich's campaign is given a second (first?) wind. I wasn't expecting Sanders to beat Clinton by that much but it sounds like I'm in the minority.

It should be noted that the delegate counts are virtually even on the Democratic side with Clinton at 32 and Sanders at 34. Additionally, Clinton has 394 superdelegates pledged to her contrasted with Sanders' 42. Superdelegates are party insiders who are free to support whomever they want and exist to help ensure the party has their thumb on the scale. Primaries are elections facilitated by the state but on behalf of private groups, the political parties, who are free to determine their candidate selection process as they see fit.

Republican delegate count:
Trump - 17
Cruz - 10
Rubio - 7
Kasich - 4
Bush - 3
Carson - 3
Fiorina - 1
Huckabee - 1
Paul - 1


Ezra Klein wrote a piece trying to reignite and reclarify why Trump's rise is a Bad Thing.

Trump's path to power has been unnerving. His business is licensing out his own name as a symbol of opulence. He has endured bankruptcies and scandal by bragging his way out of them. He rose to prominence in the Republican Party as a leader of the birther movement. He climbed to the top of the polls in this election by calling Mexicans rapists and killers. He defended a poor debate performance by accusing Megyn Kelly of being on her period. He responded to rival Ted Cruz's surge by calling for a travel ban on Muslims. When two of his supporters attacked a homeless man and said they did it because "Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported," he brushed off complaints that he's inspiring violence by saying his supporters are "very passionate."


Obama sent his budget to Congress yesterday. It had a picture of Denali on the cover. Trollbama strikes again!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 10, 2016 - 06:46am PT
In our defense, Trump's votes totaled 35% of Republican votes and 18% of total votes. It's not like 60% of NH voters went for Trump.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 10, 2016 - 07:10am PT
When two of his supporters attacked a homeless man and said they did it because "Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported," he brushed off complaints that he's inspiring violence by saying his supporters are "very passionate."

Nice cherry picking.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 10, 2016 - 07:12am PT
That was his initial response, Ed. Did you want to quote a more full throated condemnation from Trump? It was certainly lacking at the time.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 10, 2016 - 10:34am PT
Christie is expected to officially withdraw from the race today: http://www.vox.com/2016/2/10/10959064/chris-cristie-ends-presidential-campaign
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 10, 2016 - 12:32pm PT
Aaaaaaand there goes Carly.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 10, 2016 - 12:37pm PT
God, I'm going to miss her.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:04pm PT
Let's just dispel with notion that any of you know WTF you are talking about.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:09pm PT
^^
This was meant for the NASA Billion Earth's thread, I'm sure.

I hear there's an election on Kepler 452b next year, however.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:21pm PT
^^^^^ there it is. Robo boy with attempted 2.5 second canned insult.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:25pm PT
the real money betting markets still have Hillary at 83% for the nomination

they also have either Hillary and now Bernie as huuuuge favorites over The Donald

"they can't get to 270"

repeat over and over, nothing else matters
WBraun

climber
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:26pm PT
It's not Robo boy.

He's called crankturd, he's a total douchbag slime ball coward ......
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 10, 2016 - 03:29pm PT
Insult, Rick? Wow, you're thinned-skinned.

Rick enlightens us with:

Feb 10, 2016 - 03:04pm PT
Let's just dispel with notion that any of you know WTF you are talking about.

Pretty good discussion here today before you and Forum Bully trolled in. You and that clown spend hours discussing theories on the origin of the universe, god, the mind, whatever..but one little political thread drives you nuts. Advice: Stay away.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 10, 2016 - 08:47pm PT

My opologies to the CF supporter.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 11, 2016 - 05:45am PT
rick, I appreciate most of your posts and your input. Your upset at the perception of crank's insult seems a little hasty given he was responding to an insulting post that you made.


Updates:

As the presidential race moves on to more diverse states than Iowa and New Hampshire, black Americans are having a very public discussion about their choices. I think it's exciting both that black American voters are now thought of as an important demographic and that their voices are more visible than ever. Some feel they are being condescended to by Sanders supporters. Others, like Ta-Nehisi Coates, have decided to support Sanders despite very recently having criticized him for not supporting reparations. Despite Clinton's generally high support among black voters, some are questioning the Clinton legacy and confidence in carrying the black vote may be waning.

If you haven't read Ta-Nihisi Coates' case for reparations for the descendants of slavery, it is well worth a read. Even if you disagree with the idea of reparations, his overview of the way that America has discriminated against black citizens in the 20th century alone is extremely compelling and should be required reading for anyone wanting to weigh in on racial issues. Even if you disagree after reading it, it will give you a strong foundation to understand where other people are coming from when talking about BLM and institutional racism. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
dirtbag

climber
Feb 11, 2016 - 05:54am PT
It's a damn shame: Carly had so much to offer the country.


In all seriousness, she might have been the oddest of a very odd bunch running for president.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 11, 2016 - 06:25am PT
Bookmarked for later--thanks hddj.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 11, 2016 - 07:07am PT
the real money betting markets still have Hillary at 83% for the nomination

they also have either Hillary and now Bernie as huuuuge favorites over The Donald

"they can't get to 270"

repeat over and over, nothing else matters

Which real money betting markets?

Bovada and Ladbrokes have Trump over Sanders.

If Hillary gets the nomination, she wins the election.

If we have a Sanders/Trump race, Sanders may be as contentious as Trump. Neither candidate will have strong support from their party. It'll come down to wooing the swing votes.

This pairing would present a good opportunity for the third candidate to enter the race. Let's say Biden reconsidered. Or Kerry decided to run. It's not out of the question that either candidate could win simply because they're not as distasteful as Trump or Sanders.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Feb 11, 2016 - 10:07am PT
All in good fun mates. Except many of your posts, of course.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 11, 2016 - 11:05am PT
If you'd like to increase the debt by 8.2 trillion, then Rubio is the candidate for you.
If you'd like to increase the debt by 8.2 trillion, then Rubio is the candidate for you.
If you'd like to increase the debt by 8.2 trillion, then Rubio is the candidate for you.
If you'd like to increase the debt by 8.2 trillion, then Rubio is the candidate for you.

http://www.vox.com/2016/2/11/10967152/marco-rubio-tax-policy-center
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 11, 2016 - 06:03pm PT
Me and DMT have one thing in common
the same word for Carly Fiorina

I'm not sure if he applies it to other women with the same attributes
like I do



I only wish....

I can guarantee you one thing, we haven't heard the last from Carly
She will be back !
Norton

Social climber
Feb 11, 2016 - 06:13pm PT
EdwadT asks:

Which real money betting markets?


you are not aware of betting markets, of these have around for decades

anyone in the world can, in theory, open and fund an account and bet their own
money on all kinds of things from sporting outcomes to US and foreign political races

Edward. I can tell that you are a well informed individual who knows how to do a quick search using the words "betting markets" on an internet search engine

but since you specifically asked, here is just well known betting market and you can
do a search for others, you can copy and paste this into your browser

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/politics/event?id=26920188
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 11, 2016 - 07:51pm PT
It's not Robo boy.

He's called crankturd, he's a total douchbag slime ball coward ......
+1 Wbraun
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 11, 2016 - 08:12pm PT
Sorry, pyromaniac, the role of Forum Bully has been cast. There is an opening for Forum Jester, however, for which you seen highly qualified.
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 11, 2016 - 09:32pm PT
aw, crankster - you took the words right out of my mouth.

Rats.

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 12, 2016 - 05:22am PT

you are not aware of betting markets, of these have around for decades

anyone in the world can, in theory, open and fund an account and bet their own
money on all kinds of things from sporting outcomes to US and foreign political races

Edward. I can tell that you are a well informed individual who knows how to do a quick search using the words "betting markets" on an internet search engine

but since you specifically asked, here is just well known betting market and you can
do a search for others, you can copy and paste this into your browser

https://www.betfair.com/exchange/politics/event?id=26920188

Wow. Classic Norton.

I asked for specific betting markets in response to your claim they show Bernie as a huuuuge favorite over The Donald.

I noted two odds markets, placing Trump ahead of Sanders. Most people would infer I knew about "betting markets".

Not Norton. You take it upon yourself to explain betting markets, with your typical smug condescension.

Thanks for posting betfair.com

Did you notice they show Trump ahead of Sanders?

Whoosh!
Gnome Ofthe Diabase

climber
Out Of Bed
Feb 12, 2016 - 05:52am PT

crankster, Trad climber, No. Tahoe, Feb 11, 2016 - 08:12pm PT

Sorry, pyromaniac, the role of Forum Bully has been cast. There is an opening for Forum Jester, however, for which you seen highly qualified.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 12, 2016 - 06:21am PT
The debate had a good back and forth; nothing new tho.....

Have you all listened to Robert Reich at all? Just curious.... I'll post this up for your listening pleasure. I am aligned with this train of thought. I've always thought trickle down was bullsh#t. Looking for some common ground here

[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 06:31am PT
Reich has been a powerful voice on inequality for 25 years. Smart dude.

I caught about 45-60 minutes of the debate last night. I was pretty tired but I came away with a very different view of the debate than many in the media did. They are portraying Clinton as having been "cool and calm" which is certainly true but I also thought she sounded wooden, vague and unsure. She sounded very much like a politician. Sanders is consistently incredibly vague and manages to stylistically hide his political maneuvers in empowering language. He then uses that credibility to make obfuscations and half-true attacks every bit as inauthentic as any other candidate but they come off as more valid.

I would very much like to have seen Clinton from the first debate make a reappearance when she was projecting I thought more confidence and lot more warmth. She also answered more decisively and clearly then which is what people need to see.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 12, 2016 - 06:32am PT
So I guess the end game is that we are too far gone to expect even the slightest course correction in the size and scope of the Federal Gov't.

We've chained the rudder to the stanchion and now watch Bernie/Hillary and ol' floppy hair fight it out over which version of big government suits us better.

While we sail off into dave jones locker and people from other countries shake their head puzzling over how we traded away our freedom in exchange for a more powerful government.

Sounds wonderful. I hope I get to keep enough of my retirement fund to fish in the whitewater before the flush. .

EDIT: Ahoy Matey
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 06:34am PT
Escopeta posted
While we sail off into dave jones locker and people from other countries shake their head puzzling over how we traded away our freedom in exchange for a more powerful government.

Which countries are those, Escopeta? Sounds like a lot of projection to me.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 12, 2016 - 07:33am PT
I think Escopeta was referring to the countries that were impacted by Wall Streets too big to fail recession of 2007..?
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 08:17am PT
I'm not a great debate evaluator but I thought both candidates did reasonably well.

Bernie's claim that he will dramatically reduce mass incarceration by the end of his first term is complete and utter horsesh#t. He simply cannot do it; no president could, it goes far beyond simply ending income equality, and far beyond his authority.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 08:19am PT
I think he meant all those countries with tiny governments and lots of freedom. Like Somalia. Or Iraq. I hear Libyans are just shocked...SHOCKED...watching the state of our democracy right now.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 08:19am PT
How Hillary may have begun to find a winning message.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/02/hillary_takes_on_bernie_s_worldview_at_the_pbs_debate.html
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 09:13am PT
Whatever she does she needs to start sounding more inclusive and decisive about it.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 09:16am PT
And forcing her to find that message, while there are still many months left before the generals, is a reason why having a vigorous primary is a good thing.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 09:37am PT
That's an excellent point.


The purpose of a representative democracy is to have a government that finds ways to compromise in the goal of meeting the needs of the nation. The Republican party is being dominated by those who no longer believe in compromise and thus no longer believe in government. If the Democrats go the same route we are in real trouble.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 09:39am PT
crankster posted
Rubio had the worst debate performance in history

Mike Pesca pointed out how ironic it was that Rubio got called out for repeating himself instead of for essentially giving Obama credit for having improved the country over the last 8 years.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 09:52am PT
I don't know, kind of felt Rick Perry had the worst debate performance
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 12, 2016 - 10:23am PT

Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 06:31am PT


I would very much like to have seen Clinton from the first debate make a reappearance when she was projecting I thought more confidence and lot more warmth. She also answered more decisively and clearly then which is what people need to see.

One could argue, and many do, that that earlier approach has been losing her votes, via the first two votes, and she needs to change up her game----not her basic message----but her style.

And so she is......
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 12, 2016 - 10:25am PT
Bernie's claim that he will dramatically reduce mass incarceration by the end of his first term is complete and utter horsesh#t. He simply cannot do it; no president could, it goes far beyond simply ending income equality, and far beyond his authority.


Actually, he can, it is within the President's power. The President has the unlimited power of pardon (at the Federal level). He can pardon anybody he wants, to any degree that he wants, and there is no recourse to that.

But you think he is going to tell us that?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 10:27am PT
Mass pardons are almost assuredly not his plan. The vast majority of inmates, as Clinton pointed out, are at the state level.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 10:28am PT
Federal prisons hold a small portion of inmates.

So yes, evens if he set everyone in federal prisons free, it's complete horsesh#t.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 12, 2016 - 11:03am PT
Interestingly, though, the federal prisons hold a great number of nonviolent offenders (having spent 6 months there myself), and there seems to be bipartisan support for reforming federal sentencing for drug offenses, and federal criminal law generally. I suspect the consensus may diminish as each side wants to nail its bogeymen - usually without having to prove mens rea.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 11:06am PT
As TNC points out, we will not reduce our incarceration rates by focusing on non-violent offenders. We need a new crime punishment/rehabilitation regime.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 12, 2016 - 11:09am PT
"...(having spent 6 months there myself),..."

OK, I'll bite...details?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 12, 2016 - 11:13am PT
Agreed, HDDJ, but reducing sentences for drug offenses is an easy place to start, and once started, the project will gain a momentum of its own. Ever since the war on crime in the midst of the Great Society, each party has sponsored legislation to make crime more illegal -- i.e. increasing lengths of prison sentences, but doing nothing else to change crime rates.

Based on what I saw (admittedly, the least violent prison population), we waste a lot of taxpayer money detaining people who would be better punished (both from a societal and a rehabilitative standpoint) by supervised release, where the offender works, pays a penalty, and supports him- or herself. We should reserve prison sentences (or at least long ones) for people whose presence in society, even if supervised, poses an excessive danger.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 11:18am PT
John posted
Based on what I saw (admittedly, the least violent prison population), we waste a lot of taxpayer money detaining people who would be better punished (both from a societal and a rehabilitative standpoint) by supervised release, where the offender works, pays a penalty, and supports him- or herself. We should reserve prison sentences (or at least long ones) for people whose presence in society, even if supervised, poses an excessive danger.

We have a couple generations of politicians who cut their teeth arguing that that includes literally everybody. Reducing sentences for violent offenders will be incredibly hard considering what a great job we have done, driven largely by Republican rhetoric, at making prison the cure-all for crime.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Feb 12, 2016 - 12:45pm PT
Sad to say, HDDJ, the generations of politicians that say every convicted criminal is a danger to society represent both parties. Trying to reduce sentences in California law leads one into the teeth of opposition by the correctional officers' unions (to keep the Democrats in line), and the law enforcement lobby (to keep the Republicans in line).

The proliferation of laws specifying crimes without a mens rea tend to fall more toward the Democrats, but the push for longer sentences and less judicial discretion (e.g. "three strikes" laws) has been mostly Republican.

Everyone seems to forget that by expanding our prison population with offenders who pose no more danger under supervised release than they do in detention, we take away resources that could be better spent on activities that actually reduce crime in the first place, but the Democrats seem to be getting the message. Even a few very conservative Republicans (e.g. The Heritage Foundation) have finally figured it out, so there's at least some hope.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 12, 2016 - 01:21pm PT
DMT, doomed? Well, if voters vote on appearance, which apparently you do, I'll put Hillary's pantsuits up against Trump's orange face or Cruz's devil-face any day.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 12, 2016 - 01:33pm PT
No. I don't. I think she looks like a 68 year-old woman.

When the general election comes my hope is reasonable voters will focus on her words (or Bernie's if he wins). Then I don't think we are doomed.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 01:50pm PT
50% of Rubio's appeal is looks.

It didn't hurt Obama either, nor did it hurt having a beautiful wife.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 12, 2016 - 02:02pm PT
Forum Bully, go back to the Mind thread where everyone ignores your moronic gibberish and sophomoric haiku's. Useless tool.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 12, 2016 - 02:11pm PT
It's Crankomania hour on the supertopo...Are Hillary's crankpants bullet-flame proof..? Did crankster give Hillary the crankshaft..? Tune in later...
Jorroh

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
"The proliferation of laws specifying crimes without a mens rea"

So stuff like Insider trading, bond market fraud etc... As we all know the prisons are just stuffed to the rafters with those sorts of offenders.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 02:48pm PT

I don't understand why Pyro worships Trump.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 03:22pm PT
Jim Gilmore has ended his presidential bid. I am grateful that he stayed in until today just so that if Fiorina or Christie are possessed to run again people can say "Christie, whose last presidential bid was shorter than Jim Gilmore's..."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 12, 2016 - 03:29pm PT
I love that someone serially deletes their posts from this thread.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 03:45pm PT
Hmmm...who this time? Or did someone get axed?
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 04:02pm PT
Crankster,
If your sofa looked like Hillary, you'd donate it to Goodwill.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 04:13pm PT
Well, gee guys, how do you expect women to look after walking the Earth after 69 years? Swimsuit models?

Maybe I'll toss my old sofa-looking grandmother to the curb.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 12, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
Larry, been a misogynist long?

Here's something for you Hillary-haters to drool over. Your likely candidate:

rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 12, 2016 - 04:46pm PT
those are the new slim line depends Donald is sporting...You can't tell he's wearing them...
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 12, 2016 - 04:53pm PT
And Ted Cruz rocks the crossfit, no question. He's one buff 45 year-old.

Larry, since you value appearance in determining the next leader of the free world, which Republican candidate are you supporting and what physical attribute of their's helped you make that decision? (sorry, Fiorina is out of the race).

wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 12, 2016 - 05:47pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Feb 12, 2016 - 06:22pm PT




Carpet Bombing........free.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Feb 12, 2016 - 08:58pm PT
YES!

There is some science behind why Cruz's face gives so many of us "the creeps!

There are many important issues to discuss this election season, but neurologist Dr. Richard Cytowic recently highlighted a new one: Ted Cruz’s face. Let’s hear him out.

The Texas senator has garnered some unsavory comparisons: Grandpa Munster is a typical one; Kevin from The Office is another. And recently, Cytowic attempted in a Psychology Today post to figure out what, exactly, it is about the Texas senator’s face that so many people apparently find off-putting. (The post was published last month but gained a second life over the weekend after being picked up by Raw Story.

Cytowic, who declares himself “not a Democrat,” argues that Cruz’s face sends subtle facial cues that go against what he’s saying, which complicates the very thing we are trained to do from birth: figure people out. We scan every face we see to make an instant judgment of trust, an instinctual swipe right/left we do in order to figure out whether a person is dangerous or worth our time. Facial cues — eyebrows curling, nose flaring, forehead wrinkling, lip licking — help clue us into the mind behind the face.

But in Cruz’s case, Cytowic writes, his facial downfall comes in the form of his smile, or lack thereof. In a typical smile, the corners of the mouth turn up; this causes a chain reaction that makes the corners of the eyes contract, creating crow’s feet. But Cruz’s face doesn’t seem to do that, according to Cytowic: The smile doesn’t quite reach his eyes, which can be perceived as insincerity.

Another facial-oddity characteristic Cytowic points out is just north of the missing crow’s feet on Cruz’s face: the downward bend of the outside of his eyebrows. Try doing this yourself — it’s not easy to have the inner corners of your eyebrows bend up while the outer corners swerve down. “Downturned expressions usually signal disagreeableness or disgust,” Cytowic writes.

In other words, Cruz could accidentally be sending cues at rallies that he’s not a fan of his voters, which isn’t exactly the message he wants to convey. “He may well be unaware that the message of his body language is incongruent with his words,” Cytowic continues.
https://www.yahoo.com/health/health-a-neurologist-has-tried-to-pinpoint-what-184741522.html
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 12, 2016 - 09:32pm PT
She looked like a tired potato pancake. Sorry, but her appearance was worse than Tricky Dick's sweaty brow back in the day.

The sad thing is that we have evaluations like this, in which women are judged on nothing but physical appearance, while men get a pass.

Bernie can't seem to dress himself, but that is not commented upon.

I don't know why women put up with this....
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Feb 12, 2016 - 10:18pm PT
Crankster.
The true definition of a misogynist is a man who hates women, as much as women hate each other.
You can laugh at that, or you can choose to be offended

I agree with Dingus that Americans do vote on appearance. It started with maybe Roosevelt hiding his wheelchair. continued in the Kennedy Nixon debates.
The radio audience thought Nixon won, the TV audience thought Kennedy won.
This was years before the narcissistic baby Boomers came to power with a culture of instant gratification, short attention spans, the disdain for age and the compulsive glorification of youth,

Chris Christie has certainly been the butt of many jokes. Trump's hair, Cruz's devilish look, Fiorina's face, Bernie's red face and wildly waving arms.

I don't take any of this that seriously. I'll throw out opinions, or philosophy to be challenged. Sometimes humor that falls flat to a hard core partisan. Mostly my comment was on American culture.

Democrats thought Bush was a puppet. Republicans think Obama's a puppet.
If the next one is a puppet, let's give America what it really wants.
An entertainer. A Kardashian.
Hell the federal bureaucracy runs under it's own massive momentum no matter who is in office anyhow.
I say this all tongue in cheek and I have no idea who I will vote for, except we don't need anymore Bushes or Clintons.

Cheers
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 13, 2016 - 06:09am PT
we don't need anymore Bushes or Clintons.

Larry, what's in a name, really? I'm not a Jeb fan, but he'd be an improvement over W, imo. Tell me, did you suffer much under Bill Clinton's 8 years of peace & prosperity? If you look at al the candidates running, yes, we do need Hillary.


Forum Bully, potatohead, take you desultory ignorance elsewhere. HDDJ is trying to have one political thread that doesn't degenerate into the silliness that you two bring to it while trolling like pesky gnats.

dirtbag

climber
Feb 13, 2016 - 06:58am PT
I agree we don't need any bushes or clintons. That was one of the reasons I voted for Obama in 2008.


But we also don't need any more trumps, cruzes, Rubios, or kasiches. We really, really don't need that.

So, Clinton.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Feb 13, 2016 - 06:15pm PT
crankster...that wasn't a voluntary posting from me...Honestly...! A giant cigarette smoking duck invaded my mind and computer and forced me to say bad words with crank prefixes...
Stewart

Trad climber
Courtenay, B.C.
Feb 13, 2016 - 10:28pm PT
For those of us who want an in-depth insight into what makes PotatoHead's mind operate, he was kind enough to share with us his favourite website on another thread (the Ready for Bernie one).

The website is smoloko.com and it alerts us to the "fact" that the world is being controlled by Zionists, along with their Illuminati (& other) allies.

I encourage you to check this website out for yourselves & keep it in mind that this is the kind of "information" that passes for deep thought in the minds of more than a few Trump supporters.
John M

climber
Feb 13, 2016 - 10:44pm PT
I am wondering. What are your, say, five most important issues? For me (in no particular order),

* reducing national debt

* universal healthcare

* reducing the size and influence of the military complex ( this would need to be done slowly with a lot of benefits to those leaving the service, plus good benefits for those important to the service to stay)

* tax code reform, including ways to boost the middle class.

* political gerrymandering reform

* campaign finance reform

boosting our manufacturing.. not with military spending, but some other way. I don't know how. Its going to take someone more knowledgeable to figure this one out. but we need to create incentives to keep manufacture here in the states. If Japan can have a booming auto industry and pay its employees 35 dollars an hour ( including benefits) then we should be able to do the same.

...

I know.. more then 5

( how do you make those squares moosegenius ? )
dirtbag

climber
Feb 13, 2016 - 11:57pm PT
^^^1. The Supreme Court.^^^^
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 14, 2016 - 12:39am PT
Have you ever given a thought to the fact that the Western countries produce almost nothing, but employ a great number of office and service workers?

It is a solution to the occupational problem. The labour of these people is unnecessary, but it is impossible to let hundreds of millions stay at home and do nothing.

That is why ‘the USA economics’ is in many ways needed just to occupy the entire population of a country, solving the matters of being occupied, needed; establishing a reason for being.

All these citizens can afford not to think about world organisation, its history and its future, as they live a good life.

As soon as the level of life degrades, they will start to think about it, as nothing clears the mind up as well as an empty stomach.

They cannot be stopped being fed

And it is impossible not to stop feeding them.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 16, 2016 - 02:20pm PT
I tell ya, I get stuff from almost everyone. Here is the latest from Ben Carson;

I have some powerful news to share with you.
The New Hampshire results were pretty much what we expected. With the mass exodus of people from Massachusetts to this once conservative state, New Hampshire is no longer the state that Ronald Reagan carried.
That, combined with the fact that Democrats and Independents can vote in the New Hampshire primary, makes it a meaningless and unrepresentative primary in this race for the White House.
Of course, in Iowa, Ben Carson was sabotaged by the dirty lie that he was pulling out of the race.
Just before the voting commenced in the Iowa Caucus, the Cruz campaign decided to twist a CNN story about Ben Carson going to Florida after the caucus into a lie that Ben Carson was pulling out of the race.
In one caucus, an attempt was reportedly made to physically block an elderly Carson leader from telling the truth.
Even after Ben Carson made it abundantly clear that he was in the race until the end, Ted Cruz sent out a tweet indicating that Ben Carson was dropping out of the contest.
In fact, going into the Iowa Caucus, nearly 40,000 Iowa Republicans had pledged to vote for Ben Carson. Yet, on the night of the Caucus, Ben Carson received only 18,000 caucus votes.
Think about it.
Suppose you had pledged to vote for Ben Carson and then were informed that he had dropped out of the race. Why waste your vote for Ben Carson? Why not vote for what you believe to be the next best conservative in the race?
Apparently that is exactly what happened all across the state of Iowa.
As a result, instead of finishing in second or third place, Ben Carson finished in fourth place.
It was Washington, DC, politics at its very worst.
It must not happen again in South Carolina.
We have been in South Carolina since early 2014 and have more than 1,200 volunteers who have passed out hundreds of copies of my book, Ben Carson, Rx for America. We have worked South Carolina hard, but we need your immediate help.
Unfortunately and incredibly, there are already rumors that the Cruz campaign is once again saying that Carson is out and Carson supporters should not waste their vote by voting for him.
Whether these stories are true or not, I cannot yet confirm, but after the dirty trick they pulled in Iowa, I guess I should not be surprised.
That’s why we are going on the offensive in South Carolina.

Then, there is that pesky Marco Rubio


Friend,

We did it. At Saturday night's debate, we had the chance to prove something we knew all along: we have the momentum to not only win the Republican nomination, but also the White House this year.

A CBS News poll found that I was the standout winner in South Carolina Saturday night -- well ahead of Trump, ahead of Cruz, ahead of the rest of the pack.

But with just a few days remaining until the South Carolina Primary, I need to know I continue to have your support. With your support, we can continue to harness this momentum through Nevada, through Super Tuesday, and beyond.

We all know how critical this election will be. It's our last chance to move our nation back on track, and build a New American Century we can be proud to pass on to our children and our grandchildren.

It's all on the information superhighway!
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Feb 16, 2016 - 02:33pm PT
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 16, 2016 - 03:53pm PT
Wow. I think Stahlbro may be on to something!
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Feb 16, 2016 - 04:23pm PT
Appologies to Granpa Munster. He did not deserve that.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 18, 2016 - 10:11pm PT
it is possible that some people on this site are actually capable of reading something longer than a sound bite

so those of you may find the following online book educational:


http://lit.md/files/nstarikov/rouble_nationalization-the_way_to_russia's_freedom.pdf


ISBN 978-5-459-01703-8
Unrestrained issuing of money backed by nothing has been the dream of bankers and moneylenders for centuries. This is the shortest way to world domination. Today this dream has become reality. All the world’s money stocks are tied to the dollar, which can be issued without restrictions. As a result of defeat in the Cold War Russia was deprived of a significant part of its sovereignty. The Russian rouble does not belong to the people anymore. The only way out of the dead end is to change the current form of the system of money-issuing.
By reading this book you will find out the answers to the following questions: What are the gold and currency reserves of Russia and why do they not belong to the Russian Government? Who was Stalin’s ‘Chubais’ and how did the leader of the USSR treat him? How are the deaths of American presidents connected to various types of identical American dollars? How did Benito Mussolini cooperate with the British intelligence service and what did it lead to? Why did the USSR refuse to enter the IMF and sign the Bretton Woods agreement? Who was knighted upon Stalin’s death and why? What constitution did Sakharov offer to his country?
The story of the Bank of England, the reasons for Joseph Stalin’s death, unknown snipers on the rooftops of Moscow in October 1993, the Central Bank of Russia independent from Russia — these are parts of one thing; the roots of one tree.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 19, 2016 - 05:32am PT
Answer: maybe when you post something other than conspiratorial fringy tomes written by loony tunes.

About the author:

Starikov is the leader of several political organizations, including the Union of Russian Citizens (Russian: Профсоюз Граждан России), founded on 25 April 2011, and the conservative Great Fatherland Party (Russian: Партия Великое Отечество), registered on 10 April 2013. He has championed a revisionist view of Joseph Stalin, portraying him as an effective leader and bulwark against western expansion.[3]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Starikov
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 19, 2016 - 05:55am PT
Nice one StahlBro.

Go to Google and type in 'Is Ted Cruz the' and look at the first hit. Hahahaha.

And still no denial, so it must be true. After all, some people say...........
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 19, 2016 - 06:31am PT
SPLC's Intelligence Report: Amid Year of Lethal Violence, Extremist Groups Expanded Ranks in 2015

February 17, 2016

https://www.splcenter.org/news/2016/02/17/splcs-intelligence-report-amid-year-lethal-violence-extremist-groups-expanded-ranks-2015

The number of extremist groups operating in the United States grew in 2015 – a year awash in deadly extremist violence and hateful rhetoric from mainstream political figures, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s annual census of hate groups and other extremist organizations.

The SPLC found that the number of hate groups operating in 2015 was 14 percent higher than in 2014. Antigovernment “Patriot” groups – armed militias and others animated by conspiracy theories – also grew 14 percent during the same period.

“While the number of extremist groups grew in 2015 after several years of declines, the real story was the deadly violence committed by extremists in city after city,” said Mark Potok, senior fellow at the SPLC and editor of the Intelligence Report. “Whether it was Charleston, San Bernardino or Colorado Springs, 2015 was clearly a year of deadly action for extremists.”

Hate groups increased from 784 groups in 2014 to 892 last year. Antigovernment “Patriot” groups grew from 874 in 2014 to 998.

This growth came amid a series of lethal terrorist attacks by extremists. In June, a white supremacist murdered nine black parishioners at a church in Charleston, South Carolina. In December, Islamist radicals killed 14 people at a work party in San Bernardino, California – just days after an anti-abortion extremist killed three people at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado. These were just the worst of numerous other attacks and foiled extremist plots reviewed in this issue.

“After seeing the bloodshed that defined 2015, our politicians should have worked to defuse this anger and bring us together as a nation,” Potok said. “Unfortunately, the carnage did little to dissuade some political figures from spouting incendiary rhetoric about minorities. In fact, they frequently exploited the anger and polarization across the country for political gain.”


The demonization of Muslims, Latinos, immigrants and others became commonplace in 2015. Presidential candidate Donald Trump made headlines with a call for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration and his description of Mexican immigrants as rapists and drug dealers. He even cited a bogus “poll” by the Center for Security Policy that falsely claimed that a quarter of American Muslims support violent jihadists such as the members of the Islamic State.

The Center for Security Policy is one of two anti-Muslim groups listed as hate groups for the first time in this year’s report. The other is ACT! for America.

Other political figures launched their own verbal attacks against a host of targets to exploit the anger and fear of some Americans over the country’s changing demographics, immigration, the legalization of same-sex marriage, the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement and atrocities committed by Islamist terrorists. Economic pressure on white, working-class Americans has also contributed to the anger.

“Backlash,” a related report within this issue, explores the wave of violence and hatred directed at American Muslims in the wake of shrill attacks by major presidential candidates and recent jihadist massacres in Paris and San Bernardino.

These messages by mainstream political figures were often amplified by right-wing media outlets, adding to the sense of polarization and anger across the country – an atmosphere that may be unmatched since the political upheavals of 1968. With the new year beginning with armed militiamen seizing a federal wildlife refuge near Burns, Oregon, the extremist threat in the United States appears likely to get worse before it improves.

The hate groups listed in this report include neo-Nazis, white nationalists, neo-Confederates, racist skinheads, Klansmen and black separatists. Other hate groups on the list target LGBT people, Muslims or immigrants, and some specialize in producing racist music or propaganda denying the Holocaust.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 19, 2016 - 06:36am PT
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Feb 19, 2016 - 06:56am PT
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 19, 2016 - 04:21pm PT
From Thinkprogress.org regarding Cruz' latest ad in Nevada:

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/02/19/3751233/ted-cruz-public-lands-ad/

"In a controversial new TV ad aiming to sway conservative caucus-goers in Nevada but likely to backfire with mainstream voters, Presidential hopeful Ted Cruz (R-TX) vows to sell-off or give away the state’s national parks, national forests, national monuments, and other public lands.

“If you trust me with your vote,” says Cruz in the ad, “I will fight day and night to return fuThe Cruz ad, which is launching less than a week before the Republican caucuses in Nevada, echoes the views propagated by anti-government militant Cliven Bundy, who believes that Western states should seize control of all national public lands within their borders. Cliven Bundy and his sons Ryan and Ammon were indicted this week by a federal grand jury in Las Vegas for leading armed standoffs against the federal government in 2014 in Nevada and earlier this year at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon.

The Cruz ad begins by criticizing the fact that approximately 85 percent of land in Nevada is publicly owned by U.S. taxpayers. These lands include the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the Colorado River, Great Basin National Park, the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, and Basin and Range National Monument.

Cruz’s comments in the ad, which echo legislation he introduced in 2014, do not specify whether he would dispose of national public lands in Nevada by directly auctioning them off to mining, energy, timber and other private interests or by first transferring them to the control of the state government. If they were transferred to state control, the state government would likely have to sell off a large portion to raise the money needed to pay the costs of fighting wildfires and managing the remaining lands."


Thanks Ted. You certainly DON'T have my vote. At least Trump says this is a stupid idea.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Feb 19, 2016 - 05:06pm PT
Thanks Ted. You certainly DON'T have my vote. At least Trump says this is a stupid idea.

Cruz is scary nuts..... with more stupid ideas than your average republican.



Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Feb 19, 2016 - 05:36pm PT
Watch this if you dare. The Duck Dynasty dude going all religious for Ted. Man, these people are nuts.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 19, 2016 - 05:46pm PT
Cruz is scary nuts..... with more stupid ideas than your average republican.

And that puts him in the running for the most stupid ideas worldwide.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 23, 2016 - 07:02am PT
The Republican Nevada Caucus is today. FiveThirtyEight gives Trump a 64% chance of winning with Rubio at 25%. Carson and Kasich aren't even registering. I'm still holding out that Republicans are not as lizard brain as this but I am losing hope. Super Tuesday will be the big day.


Bill Gates brushed off Apple's defiance of the government's request to access the iPhone of the San Bernadino shooter describing it as just like any other government request for phone records or personal data. This is actually a more complex issue than has been presented and there are really 2 issues at stake. The first is should Apple have to turn over the data on the shooter's iPhone 5c (which they can actually hack) and the second is on should they create a backdoor into more advanced phones like the iPhone 5s and 6 which are fully designed to be unhackable, even by Apple.

Bernie Sanders' economic plans continue to raise questions among economists and assume that huge increases in government spending will drive large amounts of economic growth and employment. Even Paul Krugman has described them as "horrifying" and "voodoo."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 23, 2016 - 07:27am PT
All the tech companies were happy to help until Snowden made it uncool. The issue before was that the government was collecting information without a warrant. The FBI has gone through all the hoops, demonstrated a need and gotten a warrant. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
dirtbag

climber
Feb 23, 2016 - 07:38am PT
Obama is finally announcing a plan to close Guantanamo. Accomplishing this would be a nice wrap on a successful presidency.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 23, 2016 - 07:39am PT
The information isn't permanently stored in the terminal and nowhere else. It is transferred to the company where it is stored and if they are served a warrant they must turn that data over so your example isn't really analogous.


dirt posted
Obama is finally announcing a plan to close Guantanamo. Accomplishing this would be a nice wrap on a successful presidency.

Yeah listening to this now. If he can even get us most of the way there I'll consider it a success. He's working against a Congress that will cut off its nose to spite its face so I don't have a lot of faith that it will actually happen this year.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 23, 2016 - 08:13am PT
I think if Trump becomes president then Trump will likely choose Rubio for V.P.. Then Trump will set up Rubio's for his Presidency position..
perfect match old business dude with a young senator ready to spread his wings..
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 23, 2016 - 08:16am PT
Pyro
Do you support Rubio's stance on Abortion
Where it will be even illegal for cases of rape or incest?
I guess you do.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 23, 2016 - 08:52am PT
Dingus: Again, the information you describe would need to be turned over to the government if they served a warrant. We're not talking about bad guys stealing information (like the Target case), we're talking the government lawfully and publicly seeking data in the investigation of a capital crime.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 23, 2016 - 09:34am PT
The New York Times reports that, despite Trump's claims, they are having a hard time finding evidence that he is a the influential power broker and developer that he claims to be.

The major banks, for their part, say they are leery of lending to him after having lost millions of dollars on past deals. Lawyers and contractors he has hired in the past say he is slow to pay his bills, and often shortchanges them. Even the few Wall Street executives who say privately that he is a friend are loath to speak publicly about him.


In honor of Black History Month, Ben Carson has decided that Obama isn't really black. Presumably because he never stabbed anybody.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 23, 2016 - 10:54am PT
Pyro
Do you support Rubio's stance on Abortion
Where it will be even illegal for cases of rape or incest?
I guess you do.

Craig the abortion thing is a no brainer maybe TRUMP will have to train RUBIO..
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 23, 2016 - 11:01am PT
As in it's a no brainer that all Republicans want to abolish abortion
and you are right there with them?

And you must want to abolish Social Security and Medicare as well.
Hope you're saving for your retirement?
Don't put it all in stocks though, the Republicans plan on another crash soon.

do you really know what you're voting for?
Thought not


Donald Trump, Crony Capitalist

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/opinion/campaign-stops/donald-trump-crony-capitalist.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=MostPopularFB&version=Full®ion=Marginalia&src=me&pgtype=article

With the pretense of defending free markets, the Republican Party consistently supported big business. When did any Republican presidential candidate — other than Mr. Trump — speak in favor of some antitrust enforcement? When did he campaign for tougher enforcement against white-collar crime? When did anyone call for free trade in pharmaceuticals? Or for more competitive pricing of drugs bought by Medicare?

The forced identification between the interest of markets and that of business practiced by the Republican establishment in the last 30 years made it easier for Republican voters to fall for Mr. Trump, a businessman who pretends to uphold free-market principles.

It is an indication of a country’s institutional corruption when inside a main party the only alternative to the prevailing crony capitalism is a tycoon with a long history of shady deals.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2016 - 06:06am PT
I have that article on my reading list, Craig. The hypocrisy is amazing.

A portrait of Frank Underwood is now hanging in the National Portrait Gallery among the real Presidents.

Trump won the Nevada Caucus handily though [url="hhttp://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2016/02/23/nevada-gop-caucus-looks-like-voter-fraud-bonanza/"]reports of impropriety[/url] were posted across social media. The Nevada GOP has contradicted many of these complaints (for instance, poll workers ARE allowed to wear campaign-specific clothing).


Here's an interesting column talking about where the Sanders and Trump campaigns are appealing to people in similar ways. A larger number of people are coming out saying that if they can't vote for one they will vote for another, which is pretty interesting.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 24, 2016 - 06:56am PT
In honor of Black History Month, Ben Carson has decided that Obama isn't really black. Presumably because he never stabbed anybody.

Or maybe it's because Obama doesn't have African-American roots.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2016 - 08:07am PT
EdwardT posted
Or maybe it's because Obama doesn't have African-American roots.

Please explain. Use as much rope as you need.
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 24, 2016 - 08:15am PT
^^^^^He means that he has roots in Kenya.

Don't forget, we are talking about Dr. Carson's view here.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2016 - 10:20am PT
White people defining blackness in this thread.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Feb 24, 2016 - 11:00am PT
Please explain. Use as much rope as you need.

A hanging idiom in a race reference?
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 24, 2016 - 11:53am PT
Please explain. Use as much rope as you need.

Really? You don't see it?

Neither parent was African-American. As far as I know, none of his ancestors were African-American.

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 24, 2016 - 01:10pm PT
Neither parent was African-American. As far as I know, none of his ancestors were African-American.


One parent=African
One parent=American

How more African-American can you get??????


Also, I just read Obama's book Dreams From My Father, and there is no doubt that he had an African-American experience growing up.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Feb 24, 2016 - 03:00pm PT

At least the GOP has a spectrum of choices this time around. A sort of survival of the politically fittest, winnowing out the losers and the weak. Like Bush III, for example.

Anyway, yep, its easy to chuckle at their antics.

But then I look at the democratic 'field of two' and I'm like, jesus f*#king christ those aren't any choices at all! That's the best the democrats can do? I don't laugh at the democratic candidates, rather, I shudder.

So as a R voter you can waste your vote on a Jeb!!! or a Carson and that makes things better how? With a winner take all it does no good to have a bunch of people running that have no chance.

Give the Dems credit, they didn't need their head handed to them on a plate to figure out they had no chance...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2016 - 03:23pm PT
Ben Carson is about to blow, yo! Sh#t is getting real in the Carson campaign!!!

Ben Carson Predicts A “Major Shift” Of Support To His Campaign “Very Soon”

Dr. Ben Carson, who has performed poorly in the first three Republican presidential nominating contests, says a groundswell of support will soon head towards his candidacy.

“This is a very unusual election, and I think all the traditional rules are out the door,” Carson told radio host David Webb on SiriusXM on Tuesday evening. “I do believe that the American people will very soon become very interested in the issues and the solutions, and when that happens you’re gonna see a major shift.”

Carson finished a distant fourth in the Nevada caucus on Tuesday, with under 5% of the vote.

Ed posted
Neither parent was African-American. As far as I know, none of his ancestors were African-American.

Like I said, white people defining blackness in this thread.

Brandon posted
A hanging idiom in a race reference?

For him to hang himself with, yes.

Dingus posted
At least the GOP has a spectrum of choices this time around. A sort of survival of the politically fittest, winnowing out the losers and the weak. Like Bush III, for example.

Can you really call 11 people saying different versions of the same thing a "spectrum?" Ok, 9 people plus Bush and Kasich.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 24, 2016 - 03:43pm PT
A Probably what bugs me most is how few people identify their personal views on a spectrum of issues and then indicate how their preferred candidate or party best satisfies those.

I would have more respect for different opinions if someone wanted a different candidate than me because they fundamentally believe in a different desired outcome. But it seems the source of disagreement is most often a difference in perception of what will happen as a result of specific actions. That triggers me into logic/rational mode of trying to justify what I perceive as cause and effect, but this line of conversation is rarely effective in changing positions because we all seem to be entrenched in our own versions of what we see as cause and effect.

It's not quite as clear cut as physics where we can in a short term do an experiment to prove a cause and effect relationship (e.g. "When I drop this ball it will go down" "no it will go up!" "Ok, let's test it"), but we all trust our own intuition enough that it is maddening to have an intention of showing someone else what we perceive as the light, the logical interpretation.

I think I get more frustrated because these differences shouldn't be as substantial as they seem to be... It's not like we're talking "cake is good" "no cake is bad" where it's a personal choice or preference. We are talking about concepts where there is enough real-world data to make evidence-based decisions about what actions will lead to which outcomes (at least in a big-picture way). But somehow we don't embrace this logical approach, and instead try to twist interpretations to meet our preconceived notions. I wish it weren't so.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 24, 2016 - 04:47pm PT
I can appreciate where you're coming from, NutAgain. The issue though is not that we disagree on whether or not cake is good or bad, we agree for instance that everyone being employed is a good thing, Where we disagree is that liberals tend to believe the system is rigged against certain types of people finding gainful employment that supports them and conservatives believing that if they can't find such employment they don't deserve it. It's the methods we disagree on mostly.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 25, 2016 - 08:04am PT
Republicans struggle to plan for the potential that a President Trump would not share their conservative agenda.

Speaker Paul D. Ryan, chairman of the Republican National Convention, recent vice-presidential candidate and the highest elected Republican in the country, has one goal for this year: to form a conservative policy agenda for the Republican presidential nominee to embrace.

If that nominee is Donald J. Trump, that may be a waste of time.

Panicked Republicans question whether Mr. Trump will be able to unite a Republican-controlled Congress that would normally be expected to promote and promulgate his agenda, an internal crisis nearly unheard-of in a generation of American politics. On nearly every significant issue, Mr. Trump stands in opposition to Republican orthodoxy and his party’s policy prescriptions — the very ideas that Mr. Ryan has done more than anyone else to form, refine or promote over the last decade.

If the billionaire New York businessman captures his party’s nomination — which seemed increasingly possible after a decisive victory in Nevada on Tuesday night — he will become the titular head of the Republican Party, and lawmakers like Mr. Ryan will be expected to fall in line for the balance of the campaign. It is something that many in the party think may be impossible.

Recent polling from two different sources plus exit polls reveal that 20% of Trump supporters believe that freeing the slaves was a bad idea, 70% of Trump voters in S. Carolina believe that the Confederate Flag should still be flying over the state capital and 33% believe that Japanese internment camps where a good idea.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 25, 2016 - 09:26am PT
FiveThirtyEight has a great article on how Rubio still has a shot at the Republican nomination. It's really worth a read for some wonky information on how all districts and all states are not created equal.
dirtbag

climber
Feb 26, 2016 - 06:18am PT
Lindsay Graham: "My party has gone batshit crazy."

His exact words.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 26, 2016 - 06:22am PT
They went batshit crazy fifty years ago and are just now finally suffering the consequences of their actions.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2016 - 06:23am PT
That was a total train wreck last night. I do plenty of wincing during the democratic debates when they are inauthentic or don't answer in a straightforward way, but I don't understand how one could watch the debate repub last night and not be horrified of the choices. Dingus is excited about the "spectrum." The spectrum of what? It was like watching siblings fight over who should have to do the dishes. What petty garbage is this?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Feb 26, 2016 - 06:47am PT
HDDJ, you're preaching to the choir to me, but he's found an audience, obviously. Likely the same one that watched his reality TV show. For them, it's just another night in front of the tube.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 26, 2016 - 07:01am PT
This should be titled the hidesert whinge thread
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 26, 2016 - 07:17am PT
I think its important for the American public to see just how demented the process has become. The debates and media coverage are just that.

Will take a while yet for it to sink in with some people but I think more and more people are starting to realize that our two party system is in name only.

And that regardless of whether a Republican or Democrat gets elected, one thing is absolutely certain.....freedom suffers.

I am not the only person any more who has stopped voting for a "winner" and started voting according to my ideals. If that means it handcuffs our government by installing gridlock and making it more impotent, then that's a win-win.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2016 - 10:30am PT
Dingus whined
You do yourself and your cause such a disservice when you insultingly mischaracterize what others say. Like you did right up there.

Did you not just the other day laud the embarrassment of riches the "spectrum" of Republican candidates offered? Apologies if it was someone else and I'm just remembering it as you but otherwise you're just complaining about your words being characterized exactly as they were written. If you don't like how that looks then stop posting it.


Christie endorsing Trump and then the two of them clowning Rubio is an amazing bit of political theater and further evidence of what I pointed out above. Republicans are months behind the ball in reclaiming any sense of decency in their party. They need to step up or lose it forever.
Norton

Social climber
Feb 26, 2016 - 10:33am PT

I have not lost "freedoms" because of government

You?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2016 - 10:33am PT
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Feb 26, 2016 - 10:35am PT
^^^
Feckin' hilarious!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2016 - 11:15am PT
Trump imitating Rubio:


Your next presidential nominee for the Republican National Party.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 26, 2016 - 11:30am PT
Moving this discussion off the Bernie thread and over to here, per Escopeta's suggestion (and I do appreciate your follow-up that you weren't just ignoring it!):

Escopeta, I'm not being argumentative here or setting a trap, but I am honestly taking a step back to understand what an ideal federal government would look like according to you. I will challenge it with whatever inconsistencies I see, but I am honestly trying to see a different perspective, to see if I have my head stuck up my butt on some basic principles that seem obvious to other people.

My main area of skepticism is likely to be around how corporations invade our personal freedoms and well-being if we let government get too small. Somebody is going to fill a power vacuum, and I would prefer that they are beholden to a general population electorate rather than upper class shareholders.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 26, 2016 - 05:07pm PT
Dingus posted
At least the GOP has a spectrum of choices this time around.

Exactly what I said you said and how I said you said it. Are you always this defensive? Damn, son. It's like when a debate moderator quotes Trump to himself up in here.


healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Feb 26, 2016 - 05:36pm PT
At least the GOP has a spectrum of choices this time around.

I can't imagine that having a 'spectrum' of stooges is bringing any particular comfort to the gop right at the moment. I mean, these guys make Nixon look like a giant, Goldwater a saint and Eisenhower a god.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 27, 2016 - 06:13am PT
Don't intentionally quote Dingus, you dick. He gets really mad when his posts are properly taken in context.


Numerous Italians have written pieces comparing Trump to Berlusconi, a virtually perfect allegory.

Donald Trump is hilarious, you guys.

The Republican presidential candidate literally went from being that guy trolling the world on Twitter to being that guy trolling the Grand Old Party’s campaign. He says he’ll build a wall between the United States and Mexico and it will be huge and Mexico will pay for it and America will be great again. His sexism is nauseating, his ignorance cringe-worthy, his conduct baffling. He provides more memes, gifs, jokes and video games than one could possibly have time for.

And he really is winning.

In advance of the South Carolina primary on Sunday, a joke circulated online asking women if they’d have sex with Trump, if it meant he’d drop out of the race. My answer would be “no” for at least three reasons:

I am not an American citizen, and this is not the kind of thing one should even remotely consider doing for a foreign country.
Even if Trump dropped out of the race, what would we do about the people who support his brand of hatred? Would they give up their claims to US citizenship, too?
I’ve heard this question before.

Well, not exactly this question. As an Italian citizen, I have heard different variations on this question–with former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi subbing in for the Donald.
It’s been said before that Trump is America’s Berlusconi, and the comparison is easy to see. Both are older white men with a lot of wealth of dubious provenance. Both decided to enter the public arena after promising they would run their countries the way they run their companies. Both are openly misogynistic while claiming to love women, and both share a questionable sense of humor. They appeal to what in Italy is referred to as “the belly” of the electorate—their gut reactions to the issues at hand.

Both men are populism at its worst. And their tactics work.

But perhaps the most striking similarity I can draw between Trump and Berlusconi has nothing to do with their actions. No, the thing that is most worrisome about the uncanny resemblance between these two politicians is the dangerous way the public and media have perceived their candidacies... [article continues]
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Feb 27, 2016 - 07:42am PT
When Bernie Sanders said that Climate Change is responsible for large part of the problems in the Middle East the nutters went berserk....

They screamed climate change has nothing to do with it
Bernie is insane, what kind of kool aid is he on!
It was Obama's speech that led to the Arab Spring (wrong) or not staying in Iraq long enough (we had no choice but to get out)


I tried to explain it rationally, but it fell on deaf ears

But look at this, an article in this month's Scientific America detailing the issue.

Do you not believe science??
or do you admit that you were wrong, what's it going be?


The Ominous Story of Syria's Climate Refugees

Farmers who have escaped the battle-torn nation explain how drought and government abuse have driven social violence

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ominous-story-of-syria-climate-refugees/

Kemal Ali ran a successful well-digging business for farmers in northern Syria for 30 years. He had everything he needed for the job: a heavy driver to pound pipe into the ground, a battered but reliable truck to carry his machinery, a willing crew of young men to do the grunt work. More than that, he had a sharp sense of where to dig, as well as trusted contacts in local government on whom he could count to look the other way if he bent the rules. Then things changed. In the winter of 2006–2007, the water table began sinking like never before.

Ali had a problem. “Before the drought I would have to dig 60 or 70 meters to find water,” he recalls. “Then I had to dig 100 to 200 meters. Then, when the drought hit very strongly, I had to dig 500 meters. The deepest I ever had to dig was 700 meters. The water kept dropping and dropping.” From that winter through 2010, Syria suffered its most devastating drought on record. Ali's business disappeared. He tried to find work but could not. Social uprisings in the country began to escalate. He was almost killed by cross fire. Now Ali sits in a wheelchair at a camp for wounded and ill refugees on the Greek island of Lesbos.

Climatologists say Syria is a grim preview of what could be in store for the larger Middle East, the Mediterranean and other parts of the world. The drought, they maintain, was exacerbated by climate change. The Fertile Crescent—the birthplace of agriculture some 12,000 years ago—is drying out. Syria's drought has destroyed crops, killed livestock and displaced as many as 1.5 million Syrian farmers. In the process, it touched off the social turmoil that burst into civil war, according to a study published in March in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. A dozen farmers and former business owners like Ali with whom I recently spoke at camps for Syrian refugees say that's exactly what happened.

read more
WBraun

climber
Feb 27, 2016 - 08:06am PT
Yes ^^^

Agriculture (food) and water are the priorities and prime necessaries of life and they are neglected by these modern stupid politards these days.

Instead the prim focus is economic development rooted in Making money, defense, to make war, which makes money.

You can't eat nuts & bolts, war and money if there's no food to be had.

Instead these nutcases (Americans) make GMO's to solve their lunatic problem which only exacerbate the problems 100 fold.

The modern ruling nutcases on this planet are insane.

The modern nutcases who look to these rulers as leaders are totally insane too ......
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 27, 2016 - 08:46am PT
Craig: Sorry dude. I have a big ass screen. Fixed it.

Werner: Can you explain how making GMO drought resistant crops that produce better yields in arid environments exacerbates the problem?
Norton

Social climber
Feb 27, 2016 - 08:58am PT
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Feb 27, 2016 - 09:23am PT

What's your point, Norton?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 27, 2016 - 09:36am PT
Congrats future POTUS...


Welcome to the world, little Dutch!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 27, 2016 - 11:21am PT
I suspect his point is that he's multi-talented. He can be a OPR as well as a OLR
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Feb 28, 2016 - 08:05pm PT
Have fun watching this cutie (she knows more than you do…)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSOVIKi-RgI



And if you actually want to understand what is going on in Syria, check out the web site of this US Marine:

https://medium.com/news-politics/a-marine-in-syria-d06ff67c203c#.hy09lvtem

He who has not lived in the years before the revolution cannot know what the sweetness of living is.
— Talleyrand, via Bertolucci, from the 1964 film Prima della Rivoluzione

IRAQ, LIBYA, SYRIA… Countries ripped apart through sectarian and political violence in the aftermath of cataclysmic external interventions: American invasion and occupation in Iraq, NATO intervention in Libya, and international proxy war in Syria. Mere mention of these countries conjures images of sectarian driven atrocities and societal collapse into the abyss of a Hobbesian jungle. And now it is commonplace to just assume it’s always been so. Increasingly, one hears from all corners of public discourse the lazily constructed logic, “but they’ve always hated each other”… or “violence and conflict are endemic to the region.” But it was not always so — I found a place of beauty, peace, and coexistence in a Syria that is now almost never acknowledged, and which risks being forgotten about. But Syrians themselves will never forget.

I SERVED IN THE MARINE CORPS during the first years of the Iraq War and was a 9/11 first responder while stationed at Headquarters Battalion Quantico, 2000–2004. I thought I knew something about Iraq upon the start of our new “war on terror:” Arab culture, with its intrinsic primal religious passions and resulting sectarian divisions, must be brought to heel under Western values of pluralism, secularism, and equality if peace and stability are to ever have a chance. This was a guiding assumption among the many Marine officers, active and retired, that I conversed with during my years at Quantico. Iraqis and Middle Easterners were, for us, abstractions that fit neatly into categories learned about by viewing a C-SPAN lecture, or perhaps in a college class or two: there are Sunnis, Shia, some dissident sects, they all mistrust each other, and they all want theocratic states with their group in charge.

My first visit to the region while desiring to study Arabic in 2004, just after completion of active duty service, and while still on the inactive reserve list, began a process of undoing every assumption I’d ever imbibed concerning Middle East culture, politics, and conflict. An initial visit to Syria from Lebanon was the start of something that my Marine buddies could hardly conceive of: Damascus became my second home through frequent travel and lengthy stays from 2004 to 2010, and was my place of true education on the real life and people of the region. While fellow service members were just across Syria’s border settling in to the impossible task of occupying a country they had no understanding of, I was able view a semblance of Iraq as it once was through the prism of highly stable Ba’athist Syria.
The other dominating interest that drew me to Syria was the country’s ancient churches and Christian communities. Discovery of the much neglected truth that the region has always been much more diverse than tends to be acknowledged did much to undo the false assumptions of my Texas Baptist childhood. I must admit that I grew up with the usual American stereotypes of the Middle East. To most Americans, the notion of Middle Eastern Christianity sounds like an oxymoron — or is at the very least highly suspect. Many Arab and Eastern Christians are asked, upon arriving in the U.S. for visit, work, or immigration, “when did you convert from Islam?” During the post 9/11 Bush years, when Syria as part of the “Axis of Evil” became a central formulation of U.S. foreign policy, such common cultural assumptions became even more deeply ingrained. How could one be a Christian and a citizen of a “rogue” Middle East state? And yet, Christians have called Syria their home for many hundreds of years prior to the foundation of the modern nation-state of Syria.
As I began to learn more about the multi-ethnic and religiously mixed kaleidoscope that is modern Syria, I marveled at how such a country could live in relative peace and stability in a region commonly perceived to be one of the most historically tumultuous and war racked on Earth, and I had to go and see for myself.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:02am PT
^^^ Thanks for sharing that. Here's a different conversation within this thread blender.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_federal_appropriations

At least $493 billion for defense spending. That's ~ $1600+ for every man, woman, and child in this country (~300 million people).

For comparison (I just googled to get population and defense budget numbers):
 Russia has ~$81 billion for defense for 144 million people. That's about $562 for every man, woman, and child.
 China has ~ $145 billion for defense of ~ 1.4 billion people. That's about $103 per person.


So imagine if we took half of our military budget and reallocated for domestic spending. We would still be spending far more than any other country in the world, and still 8x more per person than China and almost 2x more per person than Russia.


The most obvious counter-argument is that cutting the military budget that much, we'd leave a large number of military folks unemployed... put those folks to work on domestic priorities like building roads, bridges, supertrains, groundwater replenishment systems, government IT, etc.

I would like to see a 2 year compulsory domestic service upon turning 18, paid as a military conscript would be, but without the killing people part. You would get an exemption if you enter the military, but no exemption for college. Most kids would benefit from 2 years of real world work to be motivated to study more and party less in college. A wide range of jobs could be possible- everything from keeping a chair warm at a toll booth in a national park, to various trades like plumber/electrician/mechanic, to IT jobs supporting computer and network systems, to gardening to construction to ditch digging, to administering the system itself.... imagine the wide array of services the federal government requires today, much of which is outsourced to for-profit companies.

This program, aside from decreasing unemployment and juvenile delinquency, could double as a vocational training for future career paths for folks who don't want to get a 4 year degree- or it can be the stepping stone to college for folks that didn't get on the right track out of high school. It might help reduce the cycles of poverty and drug-related employment in inner cities.



This is not even considering more corporate and rich-people taxation to fund it. And imagine with this many more people working and earning income, they're going to buy stuff like cars, food, pay rent and utilities.... THAT is the way that economic trickling works. Government spends it on normal people, normal people spend it everywhere which stimulates the economy, businesses prosper because they have more customers, and higher tax revenues pay back what was invested in the people. And we fix all the broken crap in our country and reduce crime.

Consider the "trickle down" version- tax cuts for rich and corporations... does that stimulate them to "invest" more and hire more people? Maybe, if they have a clear path to making more money by hiring more people. Or they will invest in automation technologies so they don't have to hire more people. Or they will sit on the money to be ready for a strategic acquisition so they can grow bigger, hopefully big enough to be too big to fail. Or bonuses to execs and dividends to shareholders.


Is it really so hard to see which strategy is likely to lead to have a greater stimulus effect on the economy? Not to mention help restore national infrastructure, increase employment and workforce capability, reduce crime....


When we give tax cuts to the rich, it is federal spending that goes to the savings accounts of the rich. When we grow the government to employ people, even if it is not optimally efficient in the execution (ok, even if it is half-bungled), it is still an investment that has a tangible positive effect on the daily life of a huge number of people.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 29, 2016 - 05:49am PT
NutAgain- Agreed. 2 years public service is a great idea. Among other things it would serve as a team building exercise for our country which is becoming increasingly obvious is needed as we become more and more segregated by race, class and political ideology.





Super Tuesday is tomorrow. Trump is going to sweep everything except Texas and maybe Oklahoma. Clinton is going to take everything except Vermont. Trump makes himself increasingly the candidate of white supremacy as he barely and painfully only sort of dismissively disavowed David Duke's endorsement of him.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 29, 2016 - 06:48am PT
hddj, hilarious!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Feb 29, 2016 - 06:51am PT
Just so I understand the plan clearly. You guys want to defund (or reduce funding) to the military, but in its place you would require a 2 year mandatory conscription, in the military?

So, does that mean that you were upset with the elimination of slavery then? How could you not argue that a 2 year conscription is anything less than temporary slavery....with the possibility of permanence for those that don't come back alive.

Since when did people become a national resource? Is this supposed to be a way to serve their community? To me it sounds like the government serving itself, to massive human capital.

People will voluntarily defend a country worth defending. No one, especially not the government, has the right to force another group to give up 2 years of their life - and possibly their life in total - without their consent.

We can only hope that the Supreme Court would hold that idea as unconstitutional under the 13th amendment.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 29, 2016 - 06:57am PT
Escopeta does a good job of demonstrating the lack of connection that many Americans have with the reality of what makes us a country or what allows us to have so many of the freedoms that we do have. This "nobody has the right to make me do anything I don't want to under any circumstance" vein of American selfishness is increasingly common I think.

Escopeta, please expound on the idea that conscription is slavery and reference law wherever possible. Nazi references would probably also be useful. Also explain how conscription has never been struck down under the 13th Amendment. Reference as much maritime law as necessary.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Feb 29, 2016 - 07:07am PT
+1 Escopeta
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 07:09am PT
Press gangs rock! Go Navy!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 29, 2016 - 07:35am PT
Escopeta posted
No one, especially not the government, has the right to force another group to give up 2 years of their life - and possibly their life in total - without their consent.

You can edit some italics in there too if you want it won't change the fact that currently the government does have that right.



Trump has more strongly disavowed his endorsement by the KKK and Duke claiming his original response was due to a "faulty earpiece."
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 29, 2016 - 07:58am PT
So imagine if we took half of our military budget and reallocated for domestic spending



TOO much KOOL AID NutAgain!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 29, 2016 - 08:04am PT
Now Trump is complaining because he disagreed with Duke "all weekend long on Facebook and Twitter and it's still not enough." A WHOLE WEEKEND! On Twitter!!! I mean what more do people want? Acknowledgement of systemic racism and clear leadership/policies to address it? I mean COME ON people...let's be reasonable here!
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Feb 29, 2016 - 08:31am PT
I hate Anaheim Nazis.
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-kkk-rally-stabbings-wanted-20160229-story.html

A small group of people representing the Klan initially announced that it would hold the Saturday rally in the city where the group was once powerful.

Police expected about 20 people to show up at the rally.

Hours before the protest was to begin, several dozen anti-KKK protesters had arrived to stage a counter-demonstration.

About 12 p.m., several men in black garb with Confederate flag patches arrived in an SUV near the edge of the park. Fighting broke out moments after they got out of the car. Some of the protesters could be seen kicking a man whose shirt read “Grand Dragon.”

At some point, an anti-KKK protester collapsed on the ground bleeding, crying that he had been stabbed.

Two other anti-KKK protesters were also stabbed during the melee — one with a knife and the other with an unidentified weapon, Wyatt said.

The three stabbing victims were hospitalized in stable condition, police said.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 08:34am PT
Pyro, perhaps I'm missing the joke and misinterpreting you... But Everyone else is drinking the KoolAid if per-capita military spending double other high spenders is still not enough.

What is the rational justification for that?

It is a blatant admission that we want to use lethal physical force to make the world submit to our wishes. That (edit: level of) force is not necessary to defend our boundaries, but it is necessary to influence other countries to be favorable for American business. (Edit: Among many other things good and bad,) we are a country of thugs and others who look away while sticking out our hands for what the thugs get us.

That is the basic problem with trying to use logic. People are trying hard to not see the truth because that would demand some sort of change and people don't want to give up the benefits of America being a bully in the world. And they don't want to see the real costs either.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Feb 29, 2016 - 12:43pm PT
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 29, 2016 - 01:30pm PT
hddj, that is kick-ass funny!!

.....

"I think there are plenty of folk who do 'look the truth in the eye' so to speak, and decide... we got here through force. And we'll stay here through force. Tough sh#t if the world don't like it." -dingus

I think this is spot on.

pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 29, 2016 - 01:32pm PT
It is a blatant admission that we want to use lethal physical force to make the world submit to our wishes.

we don't use force we protect freedom.
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 29, 2016 - 01:51pm PT
Pyro, are you by chance related to Werner Braun?
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:04pm PT
DMT, I think your perception is pretty dialed in on the folks who like being on the "winning" side of the empire (Trump supporters). For these folks, there is a disconnect from reality, and their allegiance is like being a fan of a sporting team without empathy or consideration for the perspective on the other side. War is not like the superbowl.

It would be interesting to understand the other side in more detail:
 hand-wringers who don't want to be bad, but in the end support whatever we have to do to keep our life comfortable (Hillary supporters)
 head-in-the-sand folks who are not pro-Empire, but who are just more focused on other issues (religion, abortion, xenophobia) - Republicans of some sort?
 folks who object in principle to the Empire and are willing to vote/act on those objections. Bernie supporters


Kind of timely on the military themes... listen to the explanation. Co-Chair of Democratic National Convention quitting that neutral position to endorse Bernie:
[Click to View YouTube Video]
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:14pm PT
I'm a big fan of Tulsi Gabbard.

Nutjob, I think you and dingus both have it dialed in on that point, as you pretty much made the same point in your earlier post, just using different words. At least it seemed to me.

I wish I could see Sanders pulling off his "political revolution" along the lines you and he would like. But I just don't. In part for the very point you and Dingus made.

You're a good egg, man. I always enjoy your posts and by and large agree with them.

What Sanders has done, I think, is raise awareness of the basic problems (need for wiser regulation to income inequality) to an all-time high. This is good.



(EDIT You've added to your post. Imo, version 1 was better.)
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:30pm PT
Pyro, are you by chance related to Werner Braun?

thanks thebravecowboy that is a compliment...
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
think of it as a pig in a blanket
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Feb 29, 2016 - 02:37pm PT
Tomorrow, it should all be about over for Bernie.

But I don't think the Repubs will be decided, yet.

Consider joining Comrade Norton and I, and reregister as Repub, so that we can support our man Donald.

Make a difference!

Force those parties to understand that "same ol', same ol'" doesn't cut it anymore.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 03:59pm PT
I was overreaching with my attempt to put people into buckets of their foreign policy attitude and who they vote for. People work in mysterious ways, and it is not for me to know what motivates the grand variety. I retract that part.


But I 100% believe that Bernie is the right candidate to lead the US toward a sustainable future, because (1) his vision is the most articulate and consistent with my values, in terms of how the US should conduct its affairs, and (2) he has the integrity to stand by his principles in the face of opposition.



Really the bigger issue, beyond president choice, is fixing the House of Representatives:
 A constitutional amendment that the party affiliations of HoR must reflect the distribution of registered voters? Just thinking out lout here, what would be the cleanest way to fix gerrymandering and the state/local level politics that controls it.

Check this article:
http://billmoyers.com/2014/11/05/gerrymandering-rigged-2014-elections-republican-advantage/



If Bernie is president, I think he would look at this issue, raise national awareness, and tackle it head on. He would show how it is not just a political issue of parties vying for power, but a legal issue of having a government that represents the will of the people, and encourage the supreme court to take a stand on it (reversing their 2004 non-action using "politics" as an excuse to not act-- see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieth_v._Jubelirer);.


skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Feb 29, 2016 - 04:22pm PT
I agree with Nut on this ^^^^^^^

What Sanders has done, I think, is raise awareness of the basic problems (need for wiser regulation to income inequality) to an all-time high. This is good.

Unfortunately, just raising awareness is not enough
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2016 - 06:34am PT
Today is Super Tuesday! Both the front runners have a good shot at sending their rivals into a failure cascade today.

Rubio still has a theoretic shot if he can manage to win a big state or two after Super Tuesday due to the RNC's delegate allocation rules which require states earlier in the cycle to proportionally allocate delegates. Florida is the first "winner take all" state and has a lot of delegates. Unfortunately for Rubio, Trump is currently running a 2/3 chance of taking Florida and big wins today (which seem likely) will only increase that gap.

Sanders has virtually no opportunity to win unless there are some big upsets. He will take Vermont and has a solid chance in Oklahoma but that's just not going to do it.

New Hampshire's largest newspaper, the Union Leader, has retracted their endorsement of Chris Christie, admitting that in the light of his endorsement of Donald Trump he was a "bad choice."

Boy, were we wrong.

We endorsed Chris Christie in the New Hampshire Presidential Primary. Despite his baggage, we thought that as a Republican governor in a Democratic-leading state he had the skills and experience the presidency needs (and hasn’t had of late). We also thought he had the best chance to take on and face down Donald Trump.

Watching Christie kiss the Donald’s ring this weekend — and make excuses for the man Christie himself had said was unfit for the presidency — demonstrated how wrong we were. Rather than standing up to the bully, Christie bent his knee. In doing so, he rejected the very principles of his campaign that attracted our support.

Voters here apparently knew better than we. Most rejected Christie but divided their votes among several others, leaving Trump to claim victory. And now, despite specifically telling us that he would never endorse him, Christie is backing Trump.

If nothing else, that might wake up some Trump fans. We will look for that, just as soon as we get the egg off our face.


Unfortunately, just raising awareness is not enough

That's true, but without it nothing at all happens and Sanders' voice/power does not die with his presidential campaign. He has only increased his brand and his pull within progressive and non-establishment circles.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2016 - 09:04am PT
Paul Ryan just called out Trump for equivocating on his rebuke of David Duke's endorsement. It was heartening to hear Ryan use such strong language even if it was fundamentally a lie.


House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) issued a stern rebuke Tuesday to the his party’s presidential front-runner, calling Donald Trump’s recent equivocation about receiving support from white supremacists a “fundamental” break from conservative orthodoxy.

“This party does not prey on people’s prejudices,” Ryan told reporters at the weekly House GOP leadership news conference.

Without addressing Trump by name, Ryan noted that the Republican presidential campaign had veered into topics such as views on “white supremacists” that should prompt “no evasion” of the topic other than repudiation of those values.

I think what he meant to say is "this part SHOULD not prey on people's prejudices."




This is why Rubio is losing. Damn.


But don't worry. Carson just dropped a game changer.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Mar 1, 2016 - 01:53pm PT
Moose, LOL! Bacon and doughnuts....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2016 - 04:23pm PT
HARRY ENTEN 7:19 PM
Right now, the updated exit polls have Kasich ahead in Vermont and Rubio dead-even with Trump in Virginia. Given that pre-election polls favored Cruz in Texas, it seems quite possible that four candidates will win on the Republican side tonight. If that happens, I don’t think we’ll be seeing a winnowing of the Republican field any time soon.

Big news with the exit polls. May be more complicated than expected!!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 1, 2016 - 07:16pm PT
You realize those ads are personalized based on all the data Google has on you, right?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 1, 2016 - 07:18pm PT
T Hocking! And all I get is this!



Obviously Obama or Trump's fault.

Them un-American SOB's!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 04:46am PT
I knew that response would come up,
but seriously I have not googled anything anti Hillary or gun control.

You don't need to. They just infer it from your other interests. They think you're an elderly college conservative/libertarian. Congrats!


Super Tuesday results were more interesting than I expected though not radically different. Sanders managed to pull off wins in 4 states, more than anticipated, but lags in the delegate count 544 to 349. Kasich nearly won Vermont but lost out to Trump.


The chance of RNC insurrection has become very real. McConnell has green lit anti-Trump ads by Republicans looking to keep their Senate seats and numerous prominent Republicans are expressing strong doubt about their willingness to support Trump as the nominee. The language being used is far stronger than I thought they'd use. This has turned out to be a far more interesting campaign than forecast!

RNC operatives are apparently floating an idea to get Carson out of the race by having him run for Rubio's seat in Florida.

Many are also apparently pissed at Kasich for staying in the race as he is costing Rubio votes/delegates. Looks like the whole RNC is on suicide watch and reality is hitting them hard.

Chuck Todd is reporting that neither the Rubio nor Cruz campaigns are seriously considering that they can win outright before the convention and are floating contested convention scenarios. This is going to be amaaaaaaaazing.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 05:24am PT
A contested convention would be ugly, ugly, ugly. I don't see how Rubio or Cruz could emerge from a convention and hope to unite the party behind their campaigns and bring in very pissed off trump voters, many of whom are voting for trump because they abhor these kind of shenanigans in the first place. And of course, trump might go nuclear and start his own damned party.

It's only march, and republicans are already royally screwed.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 05:36am PT
Rubio has the party behind him and Cruz/Trump are egomaniacs. I don't see how this ends peacefully.


I should point out that if anti-Trump ads pop up in Repub senate races half of the point will be to distance themselves from Trump's praise of Planned Parenthood for....*gasp*...providing healthcare to women.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 05:41am PT
Also, the countdown to Trump's candidacy being called a false flag operation by Democrats to destroy the RNC has begun.



Bill Kristol's streak of being wrong about absolutely everything ever continues:


Man I wish fattrad was here.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 2, 2016 - 05:48am PT
The only thing that saved the GOP is most Super Tuesday delegates were handed out proportionally. Not so March 15 with more winner-take-all states.

They have 2 weeks to stop Trump from destroying their party. Hard to do considering the state it is already in.

After he clinches, wanna bet he suddenly remembers who David Duke is?

HDDJ, Ha! Too funny...Bill Kristol's record is intact. I sure hope he doesn't pick Hillary to win.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 05:51am PT
The only thing destroying the RNC is their unwillingness to embrace their complete transformation to the dark side.



Hahaha oh man. This is EXACTLY what a Trump presidency would look like:

Travis County GOP Apoplectic Over New Chairman

The newly elected chair of the Republican Party in the county that includes the Texas Capitol spent most of election night tweeting about former Gov. Rick Perry’s sexual orientation and former President Bill Clinton’s penis, and insisting that members of the Bush family should be in jail.

He also found time to call Hillary Clinton an “angry bull dyke” and accuse his county vice chair of betraying the values of the Republican Party.

“The people have spoken,” Robert Morrow, who won the helm of the Travis County GOP with 54 percent of the vote, told The Texas Tribune. “My friends and neighbors and political supporters — they wanted Robert Morrow.”

Morrow’s election as Republican chair of the fifth-largest county in Texas left several members of the Travis County GOP, including vice chair Matt Mackowiak, apoplectic. Mackowiak, a Republican strategist, immediately announced over social media that he would do everything in his power to remove Morrow from office.

“We will explore every single option that exists, whether it be persuading him to resign, trying to force him to resign, constraining his power, removing his ability to spend money or resisting any attempt for him to access data or our social media account,” Mackowiak told the Tribune. “I’m treating this as a coup and as a hostile takeover.”

“Tell them they can go f*#k themselves,” Morrow told the Tribune.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 2, 2016 - 06:02am PT
Interesting column on how rightwing media sites like Breitbart keep the base angry and obedient 24/7.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-supporters-are-inoculated-against-the-truth/2016/03/01/08c6a12c-dff1-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-d%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Time to give them a hug...

The challenge for people who fear a Trump presidency even more than others covet it comes down to: How do you convince the inconvincible? How do you persuade the proudly unpersuadable?

First, you probably should buy them a drink, and then you should try not to insult them. (I’m talking to myself here.) Too often we in the media say or write things that feel more like a put-down than an observation. To say, for example, that someone is “undereducated” (a pollster term), which is true of a large portion of Trump’s base, isn’t the same as calling someone stupid. But it might feel that way if you’re on the receiving end.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 06:12am PT
Yeah, I agree. This is tough for then.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Mar 2, 2016 - 06:15am PT
American Politics and the 2016 presidential primaries and elections;

Welcome to the traveling sh#t show. The person who wants the job the most, is always the least qualified to have it
fear

Ice climber
hartford, ct
Mar 2, 2016 - 06:24am PT
The person who wants the job the most, is always the least qualified to have it

Ain't that the truth.

Look at the bizarre human garbage presented as the options.
HermitMaster

Social climber
my abode
Mar 2, 2016 - 06:37am PT
The person who wants the job the most, is always the least qualified to have it

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 06:40am PT
I've always found that to be a specious folk saying. Clinton is supremely qualified for the job. Romney and McCain were both superbly qualified to be President. Kasich and Bush were both well qualified. The problem is that we have created a system for ourselves where people are scrutinized beyond belief and that's nobody's fault but our own. We complain about the lack of depth and then as soon as someone shows any depth we immolate them.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 07:07am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]

Not really political, just silly.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:08am PT
Fill 'er up, Hermit!

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Mar 2, 2016 - 07:18am PT
Hooray for fracking!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 07:23am PT
This is amazing:

...Chris Christie spent the entire speech screaming wordlessly. I have never seen someone scream so loudly without using his mouth before. It would have been remarkable if it had not been so terrifying.

Sometimes, at night, do you still hear them, Clarice? The screaming of the Christies?

His were the eyes of a man who has gazed into the abyss, and the abyss gazed back, and then he endorsed the abyss.This is his life now.

...

Soon he must return to the plane onto which Trump humiliatingly sent him before. Soon he must return to the small cupboard under the stairs where he is kept and occasionally thrown small slivers of metaphorical raw meat. When he asked to be part of Trump’s cabinet he never thought to specify “presidential cabinet, of course, not a literal cabinet underground where the ventilation is poor and there is no light.” It just did not occur to him. Why would it?

And now it is too late.

Nobody is coming for you, Chris Christie. Nobody is coming to save you.

Chris Christie has seen things. Things you wouldn’t believe. Things that would make your hair fall out and turn grey all at once. But he cannot speak of them. He can only stand there. Chris Christie is the bearer of a hideous knowledge that hangs on him like a horrible weight. But he has no way to say it.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 07:42am PT
If you want to lay out the vast, vast policy differences between the Republican candidates I'd love to hear them, Dingus.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 07:46am PT
Chuck Todd is reporting that at least one Republican Senator may endorse Clinton if Trump clinches the nomination:


Chuck Todd: An Incumbent Republican Senator May Endorse Hillary Clinton

Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd revealed sources have told him at least one incumbent Republican Senator may publicly endorse Hillary Clinton for president if Trump cements his lead as the party's presidential frontrunner.

"I heard real speculation today from very informed people that at least one Republican Senate incumbent if given the choice might publicly endorse Hillary Clinton," Todd said on MSNBC's coverage of Super Tuesday.

"An incumbent Senator is at least one that I've heard that could end up doing that, making that choice," Todd said. "Not because they want to, but because they need to send that message, look there is a bunch ever them running for reelection in a lot of blue states."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 07:57am PT
What are you even talking about?
dirtbag

climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 08:17am PT
His were the eyes of a man who has gazed into the abyss, and the abyss gazed back, and then he endorsed the abyss.This is his life now.

He looked like a man with a giant turd stuck in his mouth, unable to swallow or spit it out.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 11:29am PT
Sounds like Carson is finally catching the hint. Like most neurosurgeons, he is letting the patient die long after any reasonable chance of survivability.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 11:43am PT
Donald is the best thing that could happen to both the Republican and Democratic Parties

he's the gift that keeps on giving
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 11:45am PT


"I am not going to bother campaigning but you all should feel free to keep sending money!!"
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 2, 2016 - 11:45am PT
Donald is the best thing that could happen to both the Republican and Democratic Parties

he's the gift that keeps on giving

Rather like the Tea Party?

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 11:50am PT
Rubio makes Romney look like the Fonz: http://i.imgur.com/wthCjiT.mp4


And John is right. We can all laugh and point but staying home in 2010 basically f*#ked this country for a decade.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 12:01pm PT
Rather like the Tea Party?

John

ha, good point, John

The emergence of the Tea Party was embraced by the GOP and was a very large reason they took back the House in 2010

the Tea Party was also the big reason the GOP lost the Senate to the Dems then

remember Christine O'Donnell and Richard Mourdock?

witches and woman body parts
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 12:35pm PT


Jorroh

climber
Mar 2, 2016 - 12:36pm PT
I said it right here in 2008.

"Barack Obama is going to show us just how widespread and deeply-felt racism really is in America"

I think that that has proven true.

Its something that had to come to the fore eventually, and although its an ugly and sickening spectacle, I really think its a necessary process in order for the nation to move forward. You just have to hope that the American people can get over this hump and that it doesn't get too scary in the process.

I really feel that by pandering to this very sizable element of American society Trump is doing us all a huge favor. If nothing else, he's going to force the GOP to do some serious, reality-based soul-searching in regard to the dangerous consequences of their southern strategy.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 2, 2016 - 12:41pm PT
Jorroh- You are correct, sir.



Apparently there is a rumor at CPAC that Herman Cain is being vetted for a Trump VP pick



I'm pretty sure that would cause some sort of amazing supernova that would kill everything in the galaxy but it would be beautiful to watch.


Awwwwww shucky ducky!!!
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 2, 2016 - 05:30pm PT
“This party does not prey on people’s prejudices,”

No, it doesn't prey on people's prejudices, rather it has banked on them for the past fifty years. Unfortunately, every year for fifty years they've had to up the volume on the hate and bigotry to keep it effective as the last election cycle and now it's finally come home to roost.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving group of people.
ß Î Ø T Ç H

Boulder climber
ne'er–do–well
Mar 2, 2016 - 11:02pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 05:52am PT
In case you are still someone pretending that FOX even attempts to be neutral:

Fox News is reportedly dumping Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio's path to the Republican presidential nomination just got a little narrower, as Fox News employees and guests have been instructed to stop giving the freshman senator favorable coverage, says New York's Gabriel Sherman, citing "three Fox sources." Sherman, who wrote a book about Fox News and its boss, Roger Ailes, quotes Ailes as telling a Fox host recently: "We're finished with Rubio.... We can't do the Rubio thing anymore."

The reasons, Sherman says, include Ailes' waning confidence in Rubio's electoral prospects, tension with Rubio antagonists like Sean Hannity, and, most proximately, an article in The New York Times this week detailing a private 2013 dinner at which Rubio persuaded Ailes to back his "Gang of 8" immigration bill. "Roger hates seeing his name in print," a longtime Ailes associate told Sherman. "He was appalled the dinner was reported." The Fox News chief is now searching for a new candidate to champion, Sherman said; read his entire report at New York. -Peter Weber


healyje posted
Couldn't happen to a more deserving group of people.

Americans!


High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 06:43am PT
Can someone explain something to me.

Why do states like CA and NY CONTINUE TO sit on the sidelines and let other (less influential, arguably less progressive?) states like IA, SC and NH determine our country's party nominations? cycle after cycle too.

I don't get it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 06:50am PT
Trump released a 7 point healthcare plan yesterday, responding to scrutiny that his earlier plan was to "repeal Obamacare" and "allow insurance to work across state lines" which coupled with tort reform make up the Vacuous Triad of conservative healthcare policy orthodoxy. So what does Trumpcare look like?

1. He allows insurers to deny coverage to sick people (again). That's 60 million people who could potentially lose coverage.
2. He allows insurers to charge sick people more for coverage (again).
3. Turn Medicaid into block grants. This would essentially shift the bulk of future healthcare costs to the states and ration care for Medicaid recipients.
4. He would allow people to deduct their health insurance premiums on their taxes. This would primarily help people who make good money, have good insurance and aren't sick.
5. Health Savings Accounts will be able to be passed on, tax free, as part of a person's estate. Under current law your spouse can use it but otherwise it becomes part of your estate and passes on under estate law. So this would basically just help people rich enough to get hit with estate taxes.

So essentially we would go back to the old system but with higher tax deductions that largely affect wealthy people and far less robust coverage for the poorest, especially children who are the primary recipients of Medicaid.



HFCS posted

Why do states like CA and NY CONTINUE TO sit on the sidelines and let other (less influential, arguably less progressive?) states like IA, SC and NH determine our country's party nominations? cycle after cycle too.

Because we have FITN primary in our state constitution. Come at us, broj.

Having less progressive states go first (though you'd have a hard time arguing that NH democrats aren't very progressive) is actually a good thing from the candidate vetting side. If you set up the system to churn out unelectable left wing nominees you're going to lose a lot of general elections.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 3, 2016 - 07:02am PT
Romney takes the helm of the establishment's take-down of Donald later this morning. Too little, too late, in my view. Unless the media quits giving him free time and starts honestly vetting him, he's got the nomination.

Hey Mitt, remember this?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 07:14am PT

I dunno how I missed this before. Strong defense, Carson. We all look forward to your next book which I am sure your campaign was not pre-printing promotional tour for at all.


HFCS posted
Okay, hddj, thanks. I'll research it.

I'm not at all saying the way it works now is the best way, it's just the way it is. Having larger states go first would also have big drawbacks. There's really no perfect system.



Frequent Republican blowhard Ben Stein, who has not that long ago stated that Clinton was completely worthless, is strongly considering supporting her candidacy because Trump is so bad.

Pyro is right, liberal heads are going to explode because there are Republican refugees flooding across the borders. Good thing we don't believe in building walls.



Trump University is turning up solid gold Trump Treatises: http://web.archive.org/web/20061207071233/http://donaldtrump.trumpuniversity.com/default.asp?item=98255

Outsourcing Creates Jobs in the Long Run

by Donald J. Trump
Chairman, Trump University


We hear terrible things about outsourcing jobs--how sending work outside of our companies is contributing to the demise of American businesses. But in this instance I have to take the unpopular stance that it is not always a terrible thing.

I understand that outsourcing means that employees lose jobs. Because work is often outsourced to other countries, it means Americans lose jobs. In other cases, nonunion employees get the work. Losing jobs is never a good thing, but we have to look at the bigger picture.

Last year, Nobel Prize-winning economist Dr. Lawrence R. Klein, the founder of Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates, co-authored a study that showed how global outsourcing actually creates more jobs and increases wages, at least for IT workers. The study found that outsourcing helped companies be more competitive and more productive. That means they make more money, which means they funnel more into the economy, thereby, creating more jobs.

I know that doesn't make it any easier for people whose jobs have been outsourced overseas, but if a company's only means of survival is by farming jobs outside its walls, then sometimes it's a necessary step. The other option might be to close its doors for good.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 07:54am PT
"From time to time in the following years, other states have tried to jump before New Hampshire only to discover that New Hampshire law says:"

“The presidential primary election shall be held on the second Tuesday in March or on a Tuesday selected by the secretary of state which is 7 days or more immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election, whichever is earlier, of each year when a president of the United States is to be elected or the year previous...”

"The fact of the matter is that after all these years, the voters of New Hampshire really care about their primary. They like the attention, the visibility and the economic stimulus that it brings every four years. Unlike voters in any other state, the voters of New Hampshire expect their politicians to protect their first in the nation status. And they do. The last time New Hampshire’s status was challenged was 2008, when Florida and Michigan tried to go early. Both political parties punished them. As so New Hampshire’s status lives on."

http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2016/02/05-new-hampshire-primary-kamarck
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 07:59am PT
And you'd need Jeb Bush money or Donald Trump crazy to even try. People complain about NH not being racially diverse enough but I honestly think it would be easier to get more non-whites to move to NH than it would be to change the primary system.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 10:22am PT
Dirt- Why do you keep deleting your posts?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 11:25am PT
Dirt- Why do you keep deleting your posts?


I'll answer that.... he is a dishonest troll... thats the only reason to remove something you posted. Unless you leave a EDIT notice. EG "I removed my stupid post"


HDDJ.... as soon as you see a post, copy it and post it, then it can't be deleted....


the horror
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 11:28am PT
fwiw, I deleted a couple of my posts.
Because I didn't want to participate in this morning's
silliness.

But that was this morn. It's almost noon now and
I'm in a different mood.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 11:36am PT
'll answer that.... he is a dishonest troll... thats the only reason to remove something you posted. Unless you leave a EDIT notice. EG "I removed my stupid post"

It wasn't me. I posted something on another thread earlier that was half baked and deleted it immediately. I don't remember deleting anything here.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 3, 2016 - 11:53am PT
Guyman there quite a few troll poster cowrds who do that erase sh#t..
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 12:16pm PT
Dirt.... I apologize, if I made a mistake... why did HDDJ call you out???

this place is getting sort of extra crazy lately.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 12:28pm PT
I thought there was a dirt post I responded to but maybe I'm crazy. HFCS never delete your posts, dude! POSTCOUNT IS EVERYTHING. NEVER STOP POSTING
dirtbag

climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 12:33pm PT
No worries, everyone. :-)

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 12:41pm PT
CPAC was amazing today and if you haven't been following it you are literally Hitler.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 3, 2016 - 01:36pm PT
this place is getting sort of extra crazy lately.

I think its an invasion of Trumpism -- the only proper response to criticism is insult. Facts have no place in a Trump debate.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 01:57pm PT
Haha. Trump is giving John a taste of what we've been dealing with since Bush wanted to invade Iraq. Welcome, John. You have been initiated.


Bill Kristol is looking to extend his record of being wrong about everything ever by pushing for a third party alternative to Trump, so you know that's gonna go badly : http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/us/politics/anti-donald-trump-republicans-call-for-a-third-party-option.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0


Dick Morris, the only one who might compete with Bill Kristol for his title, has declared that "Clinton and Trump are not inevitable" so you know this is a done deal.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 3, 2016 - 02:19pm PT
HDDJ, I saw Kristol's article and some of the responses today, and my thoughts weren't all that far from yours. Despite his current position, I still see Trump as a combination of Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot in 1992 -- people who knew their candidacy would cripple the Republican party and hand the election to Clinton, but who didn't care because they felt so certain they were right - and the Republican "establishment" (really our mainstream) was wrong.

Nothing changed for 2016 except the first name of the relevant Clinton. I've never seen a Republican contender with so many Republicans who can't stand him, and I was actively paying attention in 1964 when Phyllis Schlafly wrote A Choice, Not An Echo in support of Goldwater's nomination, and Reagan gave "The Speech" in support of Goldwater's election. The mainstream Republican beef with Goldwater wasn't that he was wrong so much as that he was unelectable because he was perceived as too extreme in his conservatism. (How times change!)

The mainstream Republican beef with Trump is that he is unelectable because he is wrong. Not coincidentally, Trump does much better in states with open primaries, where the votes for him can come from non-Republicans, than he does in states where only Republicans can participate. I think this reflects, at least in part, that most Republicans remain traditional conservatives, who support the free movement of goods and people and limited government. They don't trust Trump's bona fides on the subject for good reason. His international and trade policies are anything but in favor of the free movement of goods and people, and his domestic policy only consists of ends, not means.

We'll see if Kristol is right, for once. I'm not holding my breath.

John
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Mar 3, 2016 - 02:28pm PT
But, JE,he will "Make America Great Again" .
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 02:32pm PT
John posted
The mainstream Republican beef with Trump is that he is unelectable because he is wrong. Not coincidentally, Trump does much better in states with open primaries, where the votes for him can come from non-Republicans, than he does in states where only Republicans can participate

That's probably true. He is no doubt bringing a lot of people into the booth who normally skip it. That being said, there's little doubt that a sizable chunk of the activist base is thrilled with him. He has exposed rifts between elements of the conservative coalition that the media treats as monolithic a lot of the time. Remember that all of the non-Romney and non-McCain candidates had their moment in the sun before the establishment guy won. Republicans kept ignoring the warning signs and now the chickens have come home. The "mainstream" republicans you speak of are far smaller in number than you'd like to believe.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 3, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
Sh#t just got real: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/mitt-romney-stop-trump-at-convention/index.html
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 02:40pm PT
So it will come down to this I reckon:

Hillery(D).... 42%

Trump(I)...... 40%

Mittens(R)..... 12%

And this will hopefully be the death of the republicans... forever.

Trump went for the pledge.... the hypocritical republicans will go back on their pledge to support THE PARTY'S NOMINEE .....

So it comes down to this, both party's are a rigged game..... from the inside.

The truth is pretty darn ugly when its all out on the table.

Time for a smoke.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 02:57pm PT
No way will Mitt's plan backfire, lol.
nature

climber
Boulder, CO
Mar 3, 2016 - 03:00pm PT
Which plan - to keep Drumpf from the WH at any and all costs?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 03:40pm PT
Funny.... a whole bunch of the evangelical crowed stayed home and didn't vote for Mitt... so we got Obama 2nd.

I really want a Republication Party that excludes the evangelical types and their demands. F-them.

How about a party that watches where the $$$$$$$$ goes and keeps it from going down a drain.

Keeps TAXES as low as possible.

Stays out of "PIE IN THE SKY" regime changes (no matter how hard you try the Muslims don't even have a concept of democracy nor will they for another 1,000 years)

Keeps a strong military (but smart strong, not- we need 18 more nuc subs. Or the F35 ..that is a whole nother boondoggle)

Stays out of peoples personal lives..... (we don't care if you marry your Dog. or shoot heroin or own 56 automatic weapons .... just don't let them be used for no good or you pay ...big time)

Stop corporate welfare.... (why we pay cigarette farmers, so they can survive and at the same time pay huge sums for anti-smoking programs boggles my mind)

No more $$$$$ to country's who hate US.... (that is most of them)

No more troops in Europe.... (let the Germans, French and Belgium's pay for their own defense.)

I could go on and on but I wont.... back to work.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 3, 2016 - 03:50pm PT
The Republication Party is the evangelical party, the racist party, the xenophobe party, the party of skin heads, the party of the stupid, the party of the lowest of low lives, the party of the fascists, the Neo-Nazi party, the party of the greedy, the party of the selfish, the party of anti-abortion murderers,
the party that lies and misleads the public about their agenda,
they use wedge issues to dupe folks into voting for them

The Republican party is the party that watches the $$$$$$$$ go down a drain as they waste our treasure on tax cuts and military build up.

The Republicans only keep the rich taxes low, they keep the working class taxes higher than liberals would

Conservtives are the ones that want to go into every country and waste lives

Republicans are the party that does NOT Stay out of peoples personal lives..... (they want to make abortion illegal and birth control harder to get) so you like the liberal gun laws?

Republicans are the party of corporate welfare, that why we are broke, we don't tax corporations that keep the Republicans on their payroll

Republicans are the party that sends Israel and Saudi Arabia so much money

conservatives put the troops in Europe....


Guyman
You're in the wrong party, you have it completely backwards
You need to think about what's really going on, you've been duped
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 04:50pm PT
Craig .... I have a long history of watching Democrats turn good things into sh#t.

And a long history of watching Republicans do a bunch of stupid sh#t also.

But right now the best hope, IMHO, to keep us from going over the waterfall and into the toilet is the REPUBLICAN PARTY WITH D.TRUMP at the lead.

I am sorry that you can not see this.... and I'm pretty sure you can't see things the way I do.


That is life

And that is why I believe in a secret vote.










dirtbag

climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 05:09pm PT
Who is to blame for the fracture in the Republican Party?

Republican moderates, who looked the other way.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/where-were-republican-moderates-20-years-ago/2016/03/03/4c1c49c2-e18b-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 3, 2016 - 05:09pm PT
That would work just fine.....

Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Mar 3, 2016 - 05:10pm PT
I'm joining the Plastic Cake Party (realists) if they ever come around.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 3, 2016 - 05:35pm PT
Here you go, guyman


Many Republicans fear Mr Trump would lose November's presidential election.
Mitt Romney, the 2012 nominee, earlier lambasted the businessman.
"Think of Donald Trump's personal qualities, the bullying, the greed, the showing off, the misogyny, the absurd third grade theatrics," said Mr Romney.


Calling him a "phony" and a "fraud", the former standard-bearer of the party said Mr Trump's policies - like the deportation of undocumented migrants and banning Muslims from entering the US - would make the world less safe.
BBC
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 3, 2016 - 06:12pm PT
Guy

I have a $10 bet that Trump will not be the GOP candidate on Nov. 8th
I'm on your side, you can rest assured that Trump will not be the GOP nominee
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 3, 2016 - 07:05pm PT
Guy,

The Libertarian Party ain't perfect by a long shot, but its a LOT closer to your desired political end-state than the Republicans are anymore.

I am done with the Republican party. They are nothing more than Democrats in better fitting suits.

And I'm done subsidizing their efforts by begrudgingly voting for them. I would rather suffer under the socialists than be ashamed of who I voted for.

healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 4, 2016 - 12:27am PT
But right now the best hope, IMHO, to keep us from going over the waterfall and into the toilet is the REPUBLICAN PARTY WITH D.TRUMP at the lead.

There is no waterfall, it's all Rovian hysteria seeds come to fruition in your mind. You should really try to do something about it because anyone who thinks either a fringe-right (we don't govern) gop or trump are a good idea for america then they've got some pretty serious reality grip issues.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 06:05am PT
dirt posted
Who is to blame for the fracture in the Republican Party?

Republican moderates, who looked the other way.

There were plenty of moderates speaking out but they were crucified as RINOs and disinvited from CPAC. Much of the Republican establishment is more than happy to support institutionalized racism if that's what keeps them in power and their guys in the money.

Guyman posted
So it will come down to this I reckon:

Hillery(D).... 42%

Trump(I)...... 40%

Mittens(R)..... 12%

And this will hopefully be the death of the republicans... forever.

This grossly underestimates the level of anti-Trump turnout there will be for Hillary. And no, it won't be the end of the RNC "forever" but this does represent a serious moment of transformation for them akin to the Goldwater election.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 4, 2016 - 06:16am PT
Some, but a lot of moderates simply pandered instead.


Btw, if Trump loses (big if, obviously) he might inadvertently have done his party and country a service by forcing everyone to look honestly at what really has been driving the republican base all these years. (And it hasn't been a commitment to small government and Ayn Randish free market principles.)
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 06:19am PT
I'd like to believe that but I still think an element of "Trump wasn't a Real Conservative" denial will persist. After all, conservatism cannot fail, it can only be failed.


*edit* The conclusion of today's NYT editorial seems appropriate:

It is an excellent thing that the Republican leaders have noticed the problem they’ve fostered, now embodied in the Trump candidacy. But until they see the need to alter the views and policies they have promoted for years, removing Mr. Trump will not end the party’s crisis.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 06:22am PT
60 seconds of Mitt Romney lip smacking courtesy of The Daily Show: http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos/10153946130051800/
dirtbag

climber
Mar 4, 2016 - 06:24am PT
Yeah and they might just end up focusing their energies on Hillary bashing instead. Who knows. But if anything would force them to see the light, it's this.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 06:34am PT
Haha, Dingus. Yes, in the bluntest terms that is all very correct.


*edit*

It should be pointed out that the dude who set up Clinton's email server got immunity from the FBI yesterday and Clinton's last batch of emails were released in the last week. This would all be much bigger news if the Republicans weren't busy imploding.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 07:35am PT
US Economy cranks out 242,000 jobs in February while the rest of the world continues to falter. Please note that in 2012 Mitt Romney promised that the unemployment rate would be below 6%. It's now below 5%. Thanks, Obama!

Jim "I killed a man in Nam just to watch him die" Webb, who was running as a Democrat THIS CYCLE has said that he definitely won't vote for Clinton but isn't sure yet if he will vote for Trump or not.

Glenn Beck: "If I was close enough to him and I had a knife the stabbing just wouldn't stop."
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Mar 4, 2016 - 11:15am PT
Keeps TAXES as low as possible.

Sorry to single you out but

That thinking is part of the problem of the Republicans. It should be "keep SPENDING as low as possible".

That's what W screwed up, he reduced taxes (which everybody wants, at least for themselves) but kept spending high (it's much harder to reduce spending). Then we get deficits which are paid by borrowing, with interest. So we end up spending more in the long run. We should reduce spending until the deficit is small. Like 2-15% whatever works in the long run to help control interest rates, and have the safety/security of US T bills to invest in. But not so much that we end up spending a significant amount of the budget in interest.

But when we talk about reducing spending the republicans are always quick to say "reduce welfare" nevermind that there is no spending item named "welfare" you have temporary assistance for needy families, but that's a minimal part of the budget. The biggest part of the budget is defense, but the Repubs won't decrease spending there, so how do you reduce spending (the real problem) if they won't address the elephant in the room.

Of course the dems seem happy to increase spending and taxes, but at least that approach doesn't generate huge deficits and wasted spending on interest which isn't helping anybody.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 11:24am PT
Of course the dems seem happy to increase spending and taxes, but at least that approach doesn't generate huge deficits and wasted spending on interest which isn't helping anybody.

60% of US debt is held by other Federal, State and City governmental organizations. The interest is then paid to ourselves.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 4, 2016 - 11:43am PT
Trump/Mugabe 2016
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 4, 2016 - 11:50am PT
So it will come down to this I reckon:

Hillery(D).... 42%

Trump(I)...... 40%

Mittens(R)..... 12%

And this will hopefully be the death of the republicans... forever.


BE CAREFUL!

If that translates into the Electoral College results, then there is no winner, and it goes to the House of Representatives to vote on the winner!

I would predict that Romney would win that vote!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 4, 2016 - 11:51am PT
The U.S. has now posted 65 consecutive months of uninterrupted jobs gains; in all but eight of those months, payrolls have exceeded 100,000, the total necessary to keep pace with population growth. In that span, the unemployment rate has fallen from 9.5 percent.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 4, 2016 - 11:59am PT
Of course the dems seem happy to increase spending and taxes, but at least that approach doesn't generate huge deficits and wasted spending on interest which isn't helping anybody.

Wrong

Look it up, takes only a second

Republican Administrations have added more to the
National Debt then Democratic ones

In addition, since 2010 the spending arm of congress, the House
has ben held strongly by the Republicsns
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 4, 2016 - 12:02pm PT
Norton, read what you quoted again. He's not disagreeing with you, nor is he wrong.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 4, 2016 - 12:07pm PT
In addition, since 2010 the spending arm of congress, the House
has ben held strongly by the Republicsns


Norton... True dat, even though Bush was able to keep the cost of the war- "off of the books" so he could look good.

And its true that the House has had control of the $$$$$$.... but they are to chickenshit to weld the power they have been given by the US Constitution.

Fuc&en cowards, tough talkers, who shake in their boots at the thought of a government shutdown.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 5, 2016 - 05:17am PT
guyman posted
Fuc&en cowards, tough talkers, who shake in their boots at the thought of a government shutdown.

Why do they keep shutting it down then?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 5, 2016 - 11:52am PT
Yeah, uh, somehow I don't think that's what's driving the activist right.





Here's some art for your weekend:




HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 5, 2016 - 04:56pm PT
http://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/705896341826772992


Trump dick, anyone?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 6, 2016 - 06:15am PT

Yeah, so this happened.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 7, 2016 - 07:17am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 7, 2016 - 11:06am PT
Trump is bringing more people into the electoral process.


More Latinos Seek Citizenship to Vote Against Trump

Donald J. Trump’s harsh campaign rhetoric against Mexican immigrants has helped him win a substantial delegate lead in the Republican primary, but it is also mobilizing a different set of likely voters — six of them alone in the family of Hortensia Villegas.

A legal immigrant from Mexico, Ms. Villegas is a mother of two who has been living in the United States for nearly a decade but never felt compelled to become a citizen. But as Mr. Trump has surged toward the Republican nomination, Ms. Villegas — along with her sister, her parents and her husband’s parents — has joined a rush by many Latino immigrants to naturalize in time to vote in November.

“I want to vote so Donald Trump won’t win,” said Ms. Villegas, 32, one of several hundred legal residents, mostly Mexicans, who crowded one recent Saturday into a Denver union hall. Volunteers helped them fill out applications for citizenship, which this year are taking about five months for federal officials to approve. “He doesn’t like us,” she said.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 7, 2016 - 11:22am PT
The letter to Obama
from the above youtube

http://www.gq.com/story/obamacare-saved-his-life

Here's an excerpt from Brent's letter, which was posted by the White House:

"I did not vote for you. Either time. I have voted Republican for the entirety of my life. I proudly wore pins and planted banners displaying my Republican loyalty. I was very vocal in my opposition to you -- particularly the ACA. Before I briefly explain my story allow me to first say this: I am so very sorry. I was so very wrong.

"You saved my life. My President, you saved my life, and I am eternally grateful.

"I have a 'pre-existing condition' and so could never purchase health insurance. Only after the ACA came into being could I be covered. Put simply to not take up too much of your time if you are in fact taking the time to read this: I would not be alive without access to care I received due to your law. Thank you for serving me even when I didn't vote for you. Thank you for being my President."
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 7, 2016 - 12:03pm PT
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan stepped in front of cameras Tuesday and delivered just the sort of high-minded, clear-eyed, aspirational message that has made him a Republican Party standard-bearer.

”This party does not prey on people’s prejudices; we appeal to their highest ideals,” he said. “We believe all people are created equal in the eyes of God and our government. This is fundamental, and if someone wants to be our nominee, they must understand this.”

Moments later, asked what if that nominee were in fact Donald Trump — who days before had balked at denouncing the Ku Klux Klan — he was forced to retreat from the moral high ground.

”I plan to support the nominee,” he said.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 7, 2016 - 12:08pm PT
In the end, most of the republicans will line up behind Trump, although perhaps without much enthusiasm.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 7, 2016 - 11:13pm PT
I've been giving thought to who might be a good VP pick for dems.

Already mentioned Joe B, for either.

Another, Stanley McChrystal, 61

Solid, well respected General, known for not being politically correct, smart, educated. Solid leader, not subject to BS from the MI Complex.
Had a working relationship with Hillary. Really shores up Bernie.

Only downside, lives in Northeast, so lacks geographic diversity.

But I think pluses outweigh negatives.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 8, 2016 - 06:01am PT
Glenn Beck yesterday encouraged Cruz voters "don't vote angry" at which point reality became unable to encapsulate the irony and ate itself.

Obama killed a meme, continuing to be the best 8th year President ever.

The FCC is proposing to restructure its Lifeline program (the very old and popular program rebranded as "Obamaphone" by the internet and conservatives a few years ago) to include a subsidy for high speed internet to expand access to the underserved.

Netanyahu cancelled his trip to the United States where he was invited to meet with President Obama. Netanyahu did not tell the White House directly and tried to play it off as a scheduling conflict on the part of the President. The White House made it clear that there was no scheduling conflict and that they had found out through news media instead of getting a proper declination from Israel.

A smart lady made a complicated algorithm for calculating the [url="http://qz.com/631455/a-scientist-cacluated-the-cost-of-not-being-a-straight-man-and-she-wants-a-tax-cut/http://qz.com/631455/a-scientist-cacluated-the-cost-of-not-being-a-straight-man-and-she-wants-a-tax-cut/"]cost of not being a white, straight man[/url] if you were a coder and came up with some impressive numbers. Well worth a read.

Dinesh D'Souza dropped an anti-Clinton propaganda video yesterday titled "Hillary's America." I haven't had a chance to watch it all yet but I understand it includes really important points about how Democrats are the Real Racists because Andrew Jackson. Here it is for your enjoyment:

[Click to View YouTube Video]
dirtbag

climber
Mar 8, 2016 - 09:01am PT
Interesting study: southern counties with higher percentages of slave ownership tend to now have a higher percentage of conservative white people:

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/8/11175510/republicans-elections-south-slavery

In areas that had higher slavery in the 1860s, those areas have whites living there today that are more conservative overall," Blackwell told me. "They're more likely to identify with the Republican Party. And they're also more conservative on what we might call race-related issues — things like affirmative action and measures from psychology and political science that are designed to figure out what people sometimes call racial resentment."

But as we all liberals have historically been the truly racist ones, just as they are today.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 8, 2016 - 10:32am PT
Liberals take a smug sense of satisfaction in the lack of overt racism that is acceptable but we haven't done a super great job of tearing down the real barriers that racism creates. New York City, as an example, has the most segregated school system in the country. Racism does not require that a single person be bigoted to perpetuate itself, only that the system go on working. You can put the best ingredients you can find into a dog food machine but it's still going to crank out dog food.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 8, 2016 - 10:38am PT
My point was that we constantly hear some of our friends here try to say the liberal Democratic Party of the 30s 40s 50s and 60s worked hand in hand with the KKK, ignoring the political realignment of the parties that began in the 60s.

Still, while liberals are far from perfect, there is a reason why minorities tend to vote democratic in large numbers, and why people like Trump tend to run as Republicans.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 8, 2016 - 10:42am PT
Oh, absolutely. Anybody claiming that modern parties have any ideological attachment to parties of the same name in the past is full of sh#t. Parties and what they stand for change over time.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 8, 2016 - 01:42pm PT
OK I'm whigged out now.

Glad to see someone's retained a sense of humor.

John
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 8, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
Dingus posted
OK I'm whigged out now.

I can't come up with a Tory pun.



The Illuminati met recently to figure out how a better strategy than #NeverTrump.

Billionaires, tech CEOs and top members of the Republican establishment flew to a private island resort off the coast of Georgia this weekend for the American Enterprise Institute's annual World Forum, according to sources familiar with the secretive gathering.

The main topic at the closed-to-the-press confab? How to stop Republican front-runner Donald Trump.




Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google co-founder Larry Page, Napster creator and Facebook investor Sean Parker, and Tesla Motors and SpaceX honcho Elon Musk all attended. So did Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), political guru Karl Rove, House Speaker Paul Ryan, GOP Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.), Cory Gardner (Colo.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Rob Portman (Ohio) and Ben Sasse (Neb.), who recently made news by saying he "cannot support Donald Trump."

Along with Ryan, the House was represented by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (Mich.), Rep. Kevin Brady (Texas) and almost-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), sources said, along with leadership figure Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-Ga.), Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (Texas) and Diane Black (Tenn.).

Philip Anschutz, the billionaire GOP donor whose company owns a stake in Sea Island, was also there, along with Democratic Rep. John Delaney, who represents Maryland. Arthur Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times, was there, too, a Times spokeswoman confirmed.

"A specter was haunting the World Forum--the specter of Donald Trump," Kristol wrote in an emailed report from the conference, borrowing the opening lines of the Communist Manifesto. "There was much unhappiness about his emergence, a good deal of talk, some of it insightful and thoughtful, about why he's done so well, and many expressions of hope that he would be defeated."



[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 9, 2016 - 08:47am PT
Supremely hyperbolic but well done:

WBraun

climber
Mar 9, 2016 - 08:50am PT
No you're projecting all the bullsh!t that you've absorbed in your mind by the media.

At the same time you're doing exactly the same thing the media is doing.

Ultimately you don't know anything until you get in the same room with him in a private one on one.

Until then one can't really make an honest understanding of a person .....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 9, 2016 - 08:54am PT
Werner posted
Ultimately you don't know anything until you get in the same room with him in a private one on one.

You don't think people are capable of being convincingly deceptive one on one?



Glenn Beck is getting dropped by radio stations for speaking out against Trump:

[Click to View YouTube Video]

John M

climber
Mar 9, 2016 - 08:58am PT
Werner, I never met Cheney, but have no problem saying that he is evil at heart.

Have you met Hillary? Yet you say that she is evil.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 9, 2016 - 09:02am PT
My parents had about 30 minutes with Clinton a few months back along with 2 other people. She was pretty impressive.



The Pentagon is admitting to have deployed military drones over the US:

The Pentagon has deployed drones to spy over U.S. territory for non-military missions over the past decade, but the flights have been rare and lawful, according to a new report.

The report by a Pentagon inspector general, made public under a Freedom of Information Act request, said spy drones on non-military missions have occurred fewer than 20 times between 2006 and 2015 and always in compliance with existing law.

The report, which did not provide details on any of the domestic spying missions, said the Pentagon takes the issue of military drones used on American soil "very seriously."

A senior policy analyst for the ACLU, Jay Stanley, said it is good news no legal violations were found, yet the technology is so advanced that it's possible laws may require revision.

"Sometimes, new technology changes so rapidly that existing law no longer fit what people think are appropriate," Stanley said. "It's important to remember that the American people do find this to be a very, very sensitive topic."

The use of unmanned aerial surveillance (UAS) drones over U.S. surfaced in 2013 when then-FBI director Robert Mueller testified before Congress that the bureau employed spy drones to aid investigations, but in a "very,very minimal way, very seldom."
WBraun

climber
Mar 9, 2016 - 09:07am PT
A politician and the person are simultaneously two different people at times.

In their politician form they at times have to go against their own selves.

This why no can trust a politician even the politician itself .....
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 9, 2016 - 09:26am PT
A private citizen becomes a politician the minute they file to run for public office.
John M

climber
Mar 9, 2016 - 09:41am PT
A politician and the person are simultaneously two different people at times.

In their politician form they at times have to go against their own selves.

This why no can trust a politician even the politician itself .....

a politician at times has to do things he/she doesn't want to do. But that doesn't mean they have to go against themselves. Gurus also have to at times do things that they don't want to do, in order to serve their chelas.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 9, 2016 - 01:42pm PT
a politician at times has to do things he/she doesn't want to do. But that doesn't mean they have to go against themselves. Gurus also have to at times do things that they don't want to do, in order to serve their chelas.

Thanks, John. It tires me to read rants against "politicians." It makes me wonder if the ranters have any idea that intelligent people disagree with each other. The ranters gripe because the "politicians" can't produce everything the ranters want. To the ranters, in their all-or-nothing world, something equals nothing.

How did we reach this state? I read "Berners" griping because Obama didn't produce a perfectly left-wing state. I read "Trumpers" griping because the Republican Congresional leaders didn't produce a perfectly right-wing state. Both sets of critics bemoan the fact that the representatives in their chosen political factions became "politicians," which they equate with evil.

I often wonder if I'm the only one who sees compromise as a virtue. Fortunately, I get to read posts like John M's, quoted above, that lets me know I'm not alone.

Thanks.

John
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 9, 2016 - 02:33pm PT
I often wonder if I'm the only one who sees compromise as a virtue.



John your not alone..... democracy is all about compromise. Remember the 3/5 compromise?

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 9, 2016 - 03:57pm PT
Ugh. Just....ugh
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Mar 9, 2016 - 04:03pm PT
I often wonder if I'm the only one who sees compromise as a virtue.


John. No. You are not alone on this by any means.
John M

climber
Mar 9, 2016 - 05:20pm PT
There are things that one shouldn't compromise. Such as ones honesty, or ones compassion.

Programs can be a compromise. Tax rates can be a compromise. But ones basic decency should not be compromised. This is the area that I believe that Werner was talking about. In that area I do not disagree with him.

The problem is that right now in Washington and around the country, one does have to compromise their honesty and their moral center to rise to power. One basically has to self their soul, if one even has one. Either that or one is naive and is thus able to be controlled, such as George Bush. The last president with a moral center was I believe Carter. And he is looked down upon by many. Our brightest and best who have a moral center mostly can not in todays climate rise to the top.

Thankfully I believe that we are headed to a change in the positive direction. but to get there some house cleaning will have to occur. And I do not just mean in politics, as politicians are just a reflection of the masses current consciousness. War, greed, lasciviousness, selfishness. All too common.

this does not mean that there are not decent people out there. There certainly are. But they are few and mostly drowned out.

What one needs to understand is that the power hungry just use political ideas to gain power. They devote themselves to this or that idea in order to appear to be a true believer, yet will sell it down the creek anytime their power base is threatened. And then their are those who are so egotistical that they have nothing that they are attuned to, except perhaps something like money or power. Trump heads the list of those.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 9, 2016 - 05:45pm PT
Bernie knows full well that none of his agenda will be passed without a complete Democratic majority.
So to say he doesn't get it is wrong

He gets it, he needs us to vote out all Republicans in Congress, State and local dog catcher to make anything happen.

And the same goes for Hillary,

If we can get a Democratic majority, we can do many of Bernie's Pragmatic policies that we all agree on.

Free College
Medicare for all
Strong SS
A strong safety net
millions of jobs working on the infrastructure
millions of jobs shipped back "On Shore"

No one can say that these are not realistic goals
We are the richest Nation that ever existed, we should be making the retirement age Lower!

We should invest in our future generations, our environmental urgencies, science, and all the other urgently needed funds for etc.
Not more tax breaks, defunding and obstruction.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 9, 2016 - 06:41pm PT
Bernie isn't the only candidate with integrity.

Can he get anything done? His senate record is spotty.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357/report-card/2015
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 05:22am PT
Craig posted
If we can get a Democratic majority, we can do many of Bernie's Pragmatic policies that we all agree on.

If you have a Democratic majority you don't need Sanders in the White House to get any of those things.



Here's a secret though....






































...we won't have a Democratic majority. Liberals need to stop putting all their eggs in the White House and invest in local and state elections. Things are getting worse by the day for the most vulnerable Americans because Democrats have abdicated these races. I mean what is the Democratic response to the closing of abortion clinics? It's to elect a President who can shift the balance of power in the Supreme Court. That's a completely ridiculous strategy. Democrats should be investing heavily in the smaller elections which then foster and groom candidates for higher office 10, 20, 30 years from now while also affecting real change on the ground where they live AND shifting the balance of power in the Congress.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 10, 2016 - 05:29am PT
Even with a Democratic majority, Sanders won't get his program through congress. The Democrats are beholden to Wall Street, also. Plus, Sanders is not a Democrat, for that matter.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 06:37am PT
It should be pointed out that a major political question in our country right now is whether the presumptive Republican accurately labeled the steaks that he brought on stage to pitch during a major election victory speech.



This is your country, America.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 06:46am PT




A preview to Trump's America: Protester sucker punched by Trump supporter. Who winds up in handcuffs? The black protester, obviously.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/10/trump-protester-sucker-punched-at-north-carolina-rally-videos-show/
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 10, 2016 - 06:49am PT
Musta been a choice prime time event.

For a select few.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 10, 2016 - 06:53am PT
I hear the steaks are really, really small.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 10, 2016 - 07:08am PT
The bigger problem is that trump condones this sh#t. At his rallies he pines for the good ol' days when cops weren't afraid to rough up protestors.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 07:18am PT
Dingus posted
The GOP is selecting this sh#t show to represent them in November ;)

The winky face is confusing.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 07:22am PT
Poor little Marco. He tried to play Trump's game and got Trumped. The voters have left him, his kids are embarrassed by him and he's about to lose his home state.

Marco Rubio regrets his personal attacks against his GOP competitor for the White House Donald Trump, he told MSNBC Wednesday.

"In terms of things that have to do with personal stuff, yeah, at the end of the day it's not something I'm entirely proud of," Rubio told the network in a town hall on Wednesday night.

"My kids were embarrassed by it, and if I had to do it again I wouldn't."

Rubio had previously shied away from direct confrontation with Trump, but he burst out of the gate in the last debate before Super Tuesday by emptying the opposition research file against Trump.

The next morning, he bashed the billionaire as a "con artist" on television and days later poked fun at Trump's hands for being small.

"You know what they say about men with small hands?" Rubio said at a Feb. 26 rally. "You can’t trust them.”
dirtbag

climber
Mar 10, 2016 - 07:26am PT
...If he doesn't drop out before Tuesday to save face, which might be a good move.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Mar 10, 2016 - 08:41am PT
This is Fayetteville. … it’s a well-cultured area

LMAO
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 12:22pm PT
Vocal gun rights advocate who bragged about how her 4 year old gets pumped up to target shoot was just hours later shot in the back through her car seat by her son with a .45 caliber handgun.


I live in a rural area and I review every single trauma patient that comes through my hospital. I don't think I've seen a single GSW patient in the last year that was someone who didn't own guns or hang around people with guns. I'm not saying that it doesn't happen any other way, but there's a clear correlation between spending lots of time around guns and getting shot.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 10, 2016 - 12:23pm PT
Vocal gun rights advocate who bragged about how her 4 year old gets pumped up to target shoot was just hours later shot in the back through her car seat by her son with a .45 caliber handgun.



Credit: HighDesertDJ


I live in a rural area and I review every single trauma patient that comes through my hospital. I don't think I've seen a single GSW patient in the last year that was someone who didn't own guns or hang around people with guns.


I blame Obama.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2016 - 12:53pm PT
dirtbag posted

I blame Obama.



[Click to View YouTube Video]
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 10, 2016 - 01:33pm PT
The science is settled on guns
The more guns you have, the more likely that you will be killed by a gun.
The more guns our society has, the more likely you will by killed by a gun.

The percentage of times that a gun has saved anyone from being killed by a gun or stopped a crime are almost zero.
The possibility of you saving yourself by using a gun are also zero.

Guns do not make you safe, they are a net negative when it comes to your own personal security
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 10, 2016 - 07:29pm PT
Republican Threats and the Supreme Court

NYT The Opinion Pages | Editorial
MARCH 10, 2016

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/opinion/republican-threats-and-the-supreme-court.html?mabReward=A1&action=click&pgtype=Homepage®ion=CColumn&module=Recommendation&src=rechp&WT.nav=RecEngine&_r=0


On Monday, John Cornyn, the senior Republican senator from Texas, warned President Obama that if he dares to name a successor to Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court, the nominee “will bear some resemblance to a piñata.”

Violent imagery has been commonplace in political statements for a long time, but even so, it is disgraceful for a senator to play the thug, threatening harm to someone simply for appearing before Congress to answer questions about professional accomplishments and constitutional philosophy.

On Thursday, during the first Senate Judiciary Committee hearing since Justice Scalia’s death last month, Mr. Cornyn and his fellow Republicans found themselves in an unenviable position. By refusing to do the job that every previous Senate has done, they look like deranged obstructionists. On the other hand, they know that if they give the president’s nominee a hearing, it will become nearly impossible to portray that person as unqualified.

For a while, Republican leaders were saying that delaying the nomination until after a new president takes office would respect the “people’s voice” on this critical appointment. Now some, like Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, are admitting that it would be “a different situation” if a Republican were currently in the White House. “Let’s face it,” he said in a radio interview on Thursday morning, “I don’t think anybody’s under any illusion. President Obama’s nominee would flip the court from a 5-to-4 conservative to a 5-to-4 liberal-controlled court, and that’s the concern.”

In 1988, there was a similar concern for the Democrats who controlled the Senate when President Ronald Reagan nominated Anthony Kennedy to the Supreme Court. Unlike today’s Republicans, the Democrats held hearings for Mr. Kennedy and, after finding that he was qualified for the job, voted unanimously to confirm him.

It is hard to see the logical endpoint of the Republicans’ blanket obstruction. Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said at Thursday’s hearing that he will vote to confirm any qualified nominee put forth by a Democratic president next year. Even assuming he abides by that promise, how much support will he get from his Republican colleagues, most of whom have worked to block Mr. Obama at almost every step of the way for seven years?

Meanwhile, some of the country’s most pressing legal and social issues remain unresolved with the court deadlocked.

This is not what America’s founders had in mind when they gave the president the power to appoint justices, with the advice and consent of the Senate. Certainly senators are free to vote for or against a nominee, but it sets a dangerous and irresponsible precedent to refuse to consider any nominee at all.

Mr. Cornyn’s repellent remarks were, in this sense, an accurate reflection of the Republican mind-set. Piñatas are, after all, attacked by blindfolded children. The children don’t care how much damage they inflict as long as they get the prize in the end.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 11, 2016 - 07:48am PT
Trump rallies persistently include oaths of loyalty to enter and the ejection of attendees who supporters suspect are not Trump supporters. Trump's campaign manager just assaulted a reporter. The confrontations are becoming increasingly violent and Trump has done absolutely nothing to resolve this. All of this behavior (save the loyalty oaths which were common at Bush rallies) is new to modern US presidential politics. I fear that all of this foreshadows significant violence in our future, especially if Trump loses. I live in a very rural area, I have never locked my house, I leave my keys in my car in my driveway but I sometimes wonder if I shouldn't buy a gun in preparation of what is coming...

Am I being paranoid?
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Mar 11, 2016 - 08:03am PT
Am I being paranoid?

Depends, are you white?

Really though, our neck of the woods has always had it's share of crazies. I hear automatic weapons firing from my house on any given summer evening, my neighbor is plainly racist, and I still leave my keys in my car and my house unlocked. I'm white, so it's all good.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Mar 11, 2016 - 08:07am PT
HDDJ...You're being pragmatic not paranoid...When the Chump loses the November election by a landslide , his followers will go back to their living rooms , drooling , to watch Ozzie and Harriet re-runs..
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 11, 2016 - 08:12am PT
Yeah I'm not so sure about that. Trump is openly defending these people. I think if he loses it's going to get ugly. Maybe not right away but I think we're going to see these militia groups get bolder and they are going to sell a Clinton presidency as another illegitimate presidency. This isn't going to go away. As another forum I follow says about the FREEP movement...there's always more and it's always worse.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Mar 11, 2016 - 10:13am PT
Backwards Christian Soldiers

Backwards Christian soldiers
Marching to the score
Of a heartless racist madman
Just like once before
Trump the Royal master
Leads against the foe
Real or imagined
For a cheesy hat we go

Backwards Christian soldiers
Marching off to war
We don't care if he's a Christian
Just as long as he's not poor

At the sign of triumph
Liberals doth flee
Bring on the Trumper Tantrums
To seal our victory
Political correctness
Will vanish in the haze
As we pummel the protesters
With the crosses that we raise

Backwards Christian soldiers
Marching off to war
We don't care if he hates Muslims
Or an emigrant so poor

(write your own verses and continue the song. It's fun for the whole family!)
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 11, 2016 - 02:01pm PT
his followers will go back to their living rooms , drooling , to watch Ozzie and Harriet re-runs..

rottingjohnny
More like Trailer Park Boys re runs
StahlBro

Trad climber
San Diego, CA
Mar 11, 2016 - 02:21pm PT
What are all the new Klansmen and neo-nutzies going to do when the Chump loses big in November? riot or go back into hiding?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 12, 2016 - 11:11am PT
Dingus posted
Huh? Those boys are cowards. They're only safety is a sack over their ugly heads. No WAY they have the stones to riot.

They are getting bolder. A common leader is giving them a reason to organize.



http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/us/politics/a-texas-candidate-mary-lou-bruner-pushes-the-boundary-of-the-far-right.html

MINEOLA, Tex. — On Super Tuesday, Dale Clark voted for a local Republican who claimed on social media that President Obama had worked as a gay prostitute in his youth, that the United States should ban Islam, that the Democratic Party had John F. Kennedy killed and that the United Nations had hatched a plot to depopulate the world.

Mr. Clark, 75, was unaware that the candidate he had supported — Mary Lou Bruner, 68, a former kindergarten teacher running for a seat on the State Board of Education — held such views. But as he sat with his wife eating lunch in this East Texas city, Mr. Clark was ready to give Ms. Bruner the benefit of the doubt.

“I would not discount her on the basis of having those beliefs,” said Mr. Clark, a retired pilot. “It convinces me, though, that she’s quite conservative, and if I were going to err either way, I would want to err toward the side of the conservative.”

Ms. Bruner’s anti-Obama, anti-Islam, anti-evolution and anti-gay Facebook posts have generated national headlines and turned an obscure school board election into a glimpse of the outer limits of Texas politics. In a part of the state dominated by conservative Christians and Tea Party activists, Ms. Bruner’s candidacy has posed a question no one can answer with any certainty — how far to the fringe is too far for Texas Republicans?
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Mar 13, 2016 - 11:12am PT
Survey:

Choose and list one or the other for each of these four questions as what you would consider ideal attributes in children and what you would expect when raising a child.

Best Attributes for Children;

1. Independence or respecting others?
2. Obedience or self-reliance?
3. Curiosity or good manners?
4. Considerate or well behaved?


HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 13, 2016 - 12:27pm PT
All I really care is that my children don't grow up to post false choice polls on climbing forums.



What is the deal with Trump falling for literally every internet hoax he sees, then doubling down on it in a very public way and nobody cares? Can anyone really imagine the bloodbath there would be if any other candidate, especially Clinton, took a very public position on an internet hoax?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 13, 2016 - 12:36pm PT
It's rooted in talk radio. Every hoax has an audience with the righties. Limbaugh would be doing just as well.
Bushman

Social climber
Elk Grove, California
Mar 13, 2016 - 05:16pm PT

Survey:

Choose and list one or the other for each of these four questions as what you would consider ideal attributes in children and what you would expect when raising a child.

Best Attributes for Children;

1. Independence or respecting others?
2. Obedience or self-reliance?
3. Curiosity or good manners?
4. Considerate or well behaved?

This survey was used to discover the most common denominator in Trump supporters besides other quantifiers such as race, religion, financial status, political party, gender, age group, profession, etc.. The survey found that people who respect authority over independent thinking, and those who would prefer to be led by a person who espoused simple solutions to complicated problems were the most common denominators in Trump supporters above all the other denominators listed.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 13, 2016 - 07:58pm PT
HighDesertDJ


Topic Author's Reply - Mar 11, 2016 - 07:48am PT
Trump rallies persistently include oaths of loyalty to enter and the ejection of attendees who supporters suspect are not Trump supporters. Trump's campaign manager just assaulted a reporter. The confrontations are becoming increasingly violent and Trump has done absolutely nothing to resolve this. All of this behavior (save the loyalty oaths which were common at Bush rallies) is new to modern US presidential politics. I fear that all of this foreshadows significant violence in our future, especially if Trump loses. I live in a very rural area, I have never locked my house, I leave my keys in my car in my driveway but I sometimes wonder if I shouldn't buy a gun in preparation of what is coming...

Am I being paranoid?

YOU being BIG IDIOT!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 04:58am PT
pyro posted
YOU being BIG IDIOT!

Ok, now I know I have good reason to be concerned. I'm signing up for a gun safety course this afternoon.


Happy Pi Day, everyone!


Does anyone know who is advising the Trump campaign? Nobody can seem to figure it out. He said he was going to raise taxes on the rich but his tax plan blows a $10 trillion hole in the debt, mostly in tax cuts for the wealthy. He said he was for universal health care but his Trumpcare plan leaves millions who currently have coverage without it while again giving tax advantages to the wealthy. All of his policies align completely with recent Republican orthodoxy but nobody in the conservative policy world knows anyone who is actually advising his campaign, despite his boasts of getting the best people.



Clinton stumped
We are going to put a lot of coal mines and coal miners out of business.

So I guess we know what quote 50% of Republican attack ads will contain for the rest of the year.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:17am PT
By tomorrow night I expect we will see:

Bye, bye Rubio
Kasich hangs on via Ohio
Trump becomes inevitable. Sane people mourn

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 06:28am PT
There's no way Rubio survives this with any credibility and I doubt he's charismatic enough to land a FOX TV show but who knows.

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:17am PT
The science is settled on guns
The more guns you have, the more likely that you will be killed by a gun.
The more guns our society has, the more likely you will by killed by a gun.

The percentage of times that a gun has saved anyone from being killed by a gun or stopped a crime are almost zero.
The possibility of you saving yourself by using a gun are also zero.

Guns do not make you safe, they are a net negative when it comes to your own personal security

That is hilarious and the first line is awesome.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 07:42am PT
The first and last lines are an overstatement but the rest of it is basically correct.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:49am PT
The science is settled on fluffy bunnies
The more fluffy bunnies you have, the more likely that you will be killed by a fluffy bunny.
The more fluffy bunnies our society has, the more likely you will be killed by a fluffy bunny.

The percentage of times that a fluffy bunny has saved anyone from being killed by a fluffy bunny or stopped a crime are almost zero.
The possibility of you saving yourself by using a fluffy bunny are also zero.

Fluffy bunnies do not make you safe, they are a net negative when it comes to your own personal security
justthemaid

climber
Jim Henson's Basement
Mar 14, 2016 - 08:24am PT
Um- you may want to pick a better example than fluffie bunnies

Death from firearmser year: over 33,000 in the US alone. 600,000 world wide.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/03/us/gun-deaths-united-states/

Deaths from bunnies: 1

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-dies-after-getting-stuck-5806713

A man died after he got his head stuck in a hole and suffocated as he hunted rabbits.

Stephen Whinfrey was found slumped with his head in the ground by a stunned member of the public who was walking through a beauty spot.


...and arguably- the rabbit may not have been home at the time of the incident.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 08:26am PT
Escopeta posted
The science is settled on fluffy bunnies
The more fluffy bunnies you have, the more likely that you will be killed by a fluffy bunny.
The more fluffy bunnies our society has, the more likely you will be killed by a fluffy bunny.

The percentage of times that a fluffy bunny has saved anyone from being killed by a fluffy bunny or stopped a crime are almost zero.
The possibility of you saving yourself by using a fluffy bunny are also zero.

Fluffy bunnies do not make you safe, they are a net negative when it comes to your own personal security

It's a little sad that you put that much time into making such a specious argument. The correlative data exists for guns. If you have some data about fluffy bunnies to share I'm sure we will all start taking fluffy bunnies much more seriously. If one's argument is "the only way for us to be safer is to increase gun ownership" and increased gun ownership is correlated with less safety then it isn't much of an argument.

In any case, if you are in favor of clarifying the data we would all welcome more objective research into the public health and criminal effects of gun laws and gun ownership. It's too bad the government won't allow it.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 11:15am PT
Putin just ordered the Russian military out of Syria. I haven't been closely following the Syria talks other than that they were finally agreeing to talk a bit. Anyone know anything here?
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 14, 2016 - 11:17am PT
Assad played the fluffy bunny card.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 14, 2016 - 11:23am PT
Not even Putin denies the evidence of the dangers of fluffy bunnies!
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 14, 2016 - 11:33am PT
Putin looked at the bottom line and the cost benefit analysis said Go Home.
Besides, they got a lot of good data on their new weaponry - nothing beats
actual testing.
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Mar 14, 2016 - 11:51am PT
I know some of you feel that Escofeta is a troll, or not to be trusted, but on this matter, he knows whereof he speaks...

[Click to View YouTube Video]
dirtbag

climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 12:17pm PT
Good one!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 12:18pm PT
Finally, someone gets it.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 12:29pm PT
Regarding guns

I know and understand the overwhelming statistics of the likelihood that gun ownership statistics show more injury and death than actually used in defense

but being a Concealed Carry License holder and having my own 9mm in my computer bag with me all the time, I am proud that one of my brethren did a good thing here,
in the article it is pointed the hero had a concealed carry license and saved the day.

A customer may have saved lives by fatally shooting a hatchet-wielding attacker in a Washington state 7-Eleven this weekend, local authorities said.

7-Eleven clerk Kuldeep Singh was working at the Seattle-area convenience store early Sunday when authorities say a masked man with a hatchet entered the store and, without a word, started swinging.

When the armed man went behind the register and slashed Singh across the stomach with his weapon, a nearby customer reportedly pulled out a handgun and shot the attacker. He was pronounced dead at the scene, the King County Sheriff's Office said in a release.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/7-eleven-customer-shoots-attacker_us_56e6e63ae4b065e2e3d68d3e
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 14, 2016 - 01:41pm PT
Putin just ordered the Russian military out of Syria. I haven't been closely following the Syria talks other than that they were finally agreeing to talk a bit. Anyone know anything here?

My understanding is that he ordered some of the Russian military out of Syria. Unfortunately, I don't know enough details to know what difference, if any, this will make there. The presence of Russian troops has already done tremendous damage to the anti-ISIS-anti-Assad rebels.

It seems that the last fifteen years, at least, show the terrible cost the west has paid for its lack of reliable intelligence in the near east and Muslim Africa. Unfortunately, the nature of intelligence gathering makes it unlikely that I will learn any news that makes me think we're doing something effective about it, so I can only hope we're learning our lesson about ignoring, or worse, hamstringing our intelligence gathering capability.

John
dirtbag

climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
All the guys here on this board with their Putin-worship... l o f*#king l. Was that a bear Putin was riding... or a large sow?

I never understood the high esteem held for Putin.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 14, 2016 - 01:49pm PT
All the guys here on this board with their Putin-worship

Like who? Surely you don't really think Werner does. And if you think I
do then I'm sorely disappointed in yer reading comprehension.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 14, 2016 - 02:11pm PT

;-)
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 14, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
It seems that the last fifteen years, at least, show the terrible cost the west has paid for its lack of reliable intelligence in the White House

Fixed that for you, John!
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 14, 2016 - 02:38pm PT
That too, Gary.

;-)

John
Norton

Social climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 03:04pm PT
A Muslim college student in Kansas says he and his friend were attacked Saturday by a man who called them "brown trash" and chanted in support of GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump.


"He was shouting, 'Trump!'" Usama said. "'Trump will take our country from you guys!'"

In August, two brothers in Boston were arrested after beating and urinating on a homeless man. They said they targeted him because he was Hispanic, and one of the brothers said they were inspired by Trump and his anti-Hispanic rhetoric.


Trump, however, has done nothing to calm his supporters. In fact, he has encouraged and applauded people who lash out at protesters. On Sunday, he said he would consider paying the legal fees of a white man who sucker-punched a black man at a recent North Carolina rally.


Trump held a press conference last week and said he wants to see more of his supporters "hit back" at protesters.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-violence_us_56e6ca5fe4b065e2e3d66f79
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 05:57pm PT
When everything in your life revolves around the government and what they decide to let you do, or not do. Well, then everything gets politicized.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:08pm PT
Being necessary for a well regulated coat, the right of fluffy bunnies to bare arms shall not be abridged.
WBraun

climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:17pm PT
Cry babies crying all day long

Trump is being mean to me.

Meanwhile female reporter for sleazeball Brietbart, Michelle Fields busted for faking Trump abuse.

Cry cry cry stoopid sleazeball politard babies .....
Rock!...oopsie.

Trad climber
the pitch above you
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:19pm PT
This election cycle makes me think that Hunter S Thompson checked out early. This is his kind of territory.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:36pm PT
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 06:46pm PT
I have to be honest, I am sheepishly of looking forward to the first debate when Trump tells Hillary she's a marxist closet lesbian with gigantic cankles.

It will be both a low point and a high point of our democratic process all rolled into one.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:08pm PT
This election cycle makes me think that Hunter S Thompson checked out early. This is his kind of territory.

Oh, man! Can you imagine Thompson v. Trump!

“I felt a strange tightness coming over me, and I reacted instinctively – for the first time in a long, long while – by slipping my notebook into my belt and reaching down to take off my watch. The first thing to go in a street fight is your watch, and once you’ve lost a few, you develop a certain instinct that lets you know when it’s time to get the thing off your wrist and into a safe pocket.”

I remember reading this gem like it was yesterday. I can't imagine Rolling Stone ever publishing the like of this ever again.
“At the stroke of midnight in Washington, a drooling red-eyed beast with the legs of a man and a head of a giant hyena crawls out of its bedroom window in the South Wing of the White House and leaps fifty feet down to the lawn...pauses briefly to strangle the Chow watchdog, then races off into the darkness...towards the Watergate, snarling with lust, loping through the alleys behind Pennsylvania Avenue, and trying desperately to remember which one of those fore hundred identical balconies is the one outside of Martha Mitchell's apartment....Ah...Nightmares, nightmares. But I was only kidding. The President of the United States would never act that weird. At least not during football season.”

Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:12pm PT
A new study published in the journal Lancet finds that three types of laws governing gun ownership in America can reduce the number of firearm deaths in the country.

Universal background checks for gun purchases, background checks on ammunition purchases, and firearm identification could lower firearm mortality by 90 percent, say the authors of “Firearm legislation and firearm mortality in the USA: a cross-sectional, state-level study.”

To arrive at their results, they looked at both prevention laws (like background checks) -- and permissive laws (like stand-your-ground laws) in the country in 2009 and the number of gun-related deaths in 2010.

They found that universal background checks led to a 39 percent reduction in death, while ammunition background checks were responsible for an 18 percent drop, and gun identification laws were associated with a 16 percent dial down.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:14pm PT
I bet you guys are excited about tomorrow's results.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:17pm PT
I am!
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:20pm PT
A new study published in the journal Lancet finds that three types of laws governing gun ownership in America can reduce the number of firearm deaths in the country.

Oh, sure, in some perfect Bunnie-free universe. But in the real world, where killer rabbits lurk behind every tuft of grass, you go unarmed at your peril.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:35pm PT
Anyone that has put up rabbit fencing knows, they get in somehow.....
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 14, 2016 - 07:37pm PT
Universal background checks for gun purchases, background checks on ammunition purchases, and firearm identification

Did they explain what "firearm identification" means? I don't understand that terminology.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Mar 14, 2016 - 09:11pm PT
It's similar to rabbit fencing without the paperwork...
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 15, 2016 - 05:33am PT
I wonder how the gun control advocates plan to convince the minorities and poor that gun control is good for them. I want to be there for that.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:50am PT
Escopeta posted
I wonder how the gun control advocates plan to convince the minorities and poor that gun control is good for them. I want to be there for that.

I hear that Chicago, New York and DC have significant populations of minorities and poor people. Maybe you should come out of your fantasy world and ask them.



Here's a great contrast video of the difference between leadership and demagoguery.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

John posted
It seems that the last fifteen years, at least, show the terrible cost the west has paid for its lack of reliable intelligence in the near east and Muslim Africa. Unfortunately, the nature of intelligence gathering makes it unlikely that I will learn any news that makes me think we're doing something effective about it, so I can only hope we're learning our lesson about ignoring, or worse, hamstringing our intelligence gathering capability.

It's true. I don't see how that improves without persistent, positive engagement with the Arab and Muslim countries.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 07:25am PT
Agreed. Conservatives (and America) would have gained more by trying to out-Obama Obama instead of creating the anti-Obama.
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:29am PT
They should just get rid of all these clowns and keep Obama.

He knows who all the criminals are in DC with 8 years of experience and how to maneuver around them by now.

Obama prevented going full on war with Syria and bombing it all while Kerry, stupid Hillary, McCain everyone else bought the psyops lies that Syria was gassing their own people.

Obama found out the truth from Putin while all his own people lied like hell.

Same with Iran, Obama's people all lied and lied and lied ....
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:32am PT
what might we expect from the anti-Obama?

Our just deserts.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 07:32am PT
Trump is the nominee unless the RNC pulls some serious convention f*#kery. I just don't see it not happening. I think the only thing today will resolve is whether or not I need to keep worrying about the Democrats losing their mind and making Sanders a real contender.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 07:34am PT
Obama's senior year has truly been a wonder to behold. He's set a new standard.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:37am PT
Um, that's according to the Cambridge dictionary, although yer pic works, too.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:41am PT
Obama's senior year has truly been a wonder to behold.


Oh,yes, we so needed a new strategic bomber! And thanks to his de facto approval of the
new ICD-10 medical coding my wife is gonna retire rather than put up with trying to code whether her patient was bitten by a duck or a goose or had been sucked into a jet engine.
THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT!
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:43am PT
LOL ...
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:53am PT
It's John McCain who wants to bomb everything.

He's one of the biggest criminals in DC.

A huge treason's snake .....
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 07:57am PT
Hardly President Obama's fault.

Harry Truman would disagree, but then he was an old skool responsibilty type which,
sadly, is no longer considered cool.
WBraun

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 08:06am PT
No way Hosay

Saw first hammer next ....

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 08:06am PT
And a big hammer is useful for hiding the buck left on his desk by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 08:10am PT
Not late - unnecessary and undeserved, not to mention under-powered and a hanger queen.
But now we're preaching to the choir...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 08:26am PT
Reilly ranted
Oh,yes, we so needed a new strategic bomber! And thanks to his de facto approval of the
new ICD-10 medical coding my wife is gonna retire rather than put up with trying to code whether her patient was bitten by a duck or a goose or had been sucked into a jet engine.
THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT!

I hear Obama personally created ICD-10.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 09:38am PT
So my posts are rants but yer posts are insightful commentaries, right?

You still need to take that reading comp course and stop reading yer
prejudices into everything you don't get or agree with. I said Obama
tacitly approved the ICD coding which is just a way to say he loves
him some more bureaucracy, which is not to belittle the importance of
differentiating whether the patient was bitten by a duck or a goose.
And to my pea brain being sucked into a jet engine is an accident or
crime scene finding, not a medical condition.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 09:45am PT
Damn, Reilly. Lighten up. What's the ICD-10 code for "persistent raw nerve pouty butt syndrome?" Wakka wakka!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 10:03am PT
Well, now we know why Trump steaks failed.

He understands Mr. Trump’s sleeping patterns and how he likes his steak (“It would rock on the plate, it was so well done”), and how Mr. Trump insists — despite the hair salon on the premises — on doing his own hair.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 10:43am PT
Trump is the nominee unless the RNC pulls some serious convention f*#kery. I just don't see it not happening. I think the only thing today will resolve is whether or not I need to keep worrying about the Democrats losing their mind and making Sanders a real contender.

That's how I see it, as well.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 10:46am PT
And thanks to his de facto approval of the
new ICD-10 medical coding my wife is gonna retire rather than put up with trying to code whether her patient was bitten by a duck or a goose or had been sucked into a jet engine.

Aren't you upset with his tacit decision on the brand of toilet paper stocked in US Gov't building?/???

Where does this nutty "responsibility" for things that a person never decided, never even heard of, end?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 11:16am PT
Ken, Reilly's criticism differs rather greatly from a decision about which brand of supplies to use in federal property. The latter is a necessary corollary of owning property. Overly complicated diagnosis coding is a symptom of out-of-touch bureaucracy. The buck, in theory, stops with the POTUS for all executive branch decisions, but the President bears much more direct responsibility for the extent of time-consuming and costly bureaucratic regulation promulgated on his watch.

This President's administration has presided over a very great deal of new, costly, and in my opinion, detrimental regulation. He and his supporters show no particular awareness or concern about whether the marginal cost of new regulation exceeds the marginal benefits. A great many competent economists have evidence that the new regulations enacted during this administration have hampered economic growth, resulting in much of the stagnation, fear and anger that fuels support for a Trump or Sanders.

John
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 11:33am PT
These ridiculous ICD-10 codes, which the EuroBureaus in their never ending
expansion of bureaucracy started in the mid 80's, have already had a
HUGE effect on medical costs, and not in a good way. Medicare loves them,
of course, because they're a huge bureaucracy and they can and do deny
payment for the most petty of typos or honest mistakes that have no bearing
whatsoever on the quality or efficacy of the care given. We're all familiar
with the good old Weather Rock. Billions could be saved with a Medical Rock:

"Patient held the medical rock and described her problem. I treated patient."

We trust our providers with our lives but the gubmint doesn't trust them
for diddly. Of course, the dishonest doctors bilking the gubmint of billions
get away with it because the gubmint is too busy harassing the honest ones.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 15, 2016 - 12:07pm PT
Some of the IDC-10 codes really have me scratching my head, e.g.:

"V91.07XA – Burn due to water-skis on fire, initial encounter;”

"V9542XA - Spacecraft crash injuring occupant, initial encounter;"

Y92250, when a patient is injured in an art gallery; or

"T7501XD - shock due to being struck by lightning, subsequent encounter.”

The last one, in particular, made me happy to see that our government recognizes that lightning can strike twice. In any case, one can legitimately wonder whether the benefits, if any, from this level of detail justify the costs.

John
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 12:32pm PT
Dingus,
I thought the Trump picture should have been captioned
"Pull my finger"
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 15, 2016 - 12:37pm PT
The last one, in particular, made me happy to see that our government recognizes that lightning can strike twice.

Please don't tell me that......
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 15, 2016 - 01:02pm PT
I wonder how the gun control advocates plan to convince the minorities and poor that gun control is good for them. I want to be there for that.

How about you look for a developed nation with lax gun controls that has a murder rate lower than the US? I want to be there when you try convince minorities and poor that fewer restrictions on ownership and sale of guns make them safer.

Don't suggest any nation with registration (e.g. Canada, Switzerland, Austria), unless you support registration here.

Facts have a Liberal bias.

TE
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 15, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
Its fine TradEddie, carry on with proposing whatever gun control legislation you like.

I'm white, rich, and have as many guns as I really care to own. I will be able to defend myself sufficiently into the foreseeable future. Regulations or not.

In addition to that, we all know law enforcement is generally disinclined to enforce gun controls on middle-aged white people who otherwise aren't tangling with the law in some other fashion. So I'm good there as well.

But I do feel sorry for our minorities who will be faced off with violent criminals who have a government guarantee that their victims will be defenseless since it will take power and money to afford a gun of any kind.

But, by all means, let's be sure to invoke more gun legislation so that the poor people can't defend themselves and the rich people continue to receive the political and legal favors they are accustomed.

We might even be able to increase the law enforcement coffers by stepping up enforcement (starting in the ghetto of course)

All this time I thought you guys were supposed to be the voice of downtrodden and the representatives for the lower classes?

Maybe you could send them a few cases of pepper spray, that might help out.




Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 02:26pm PT
But, by all means, let's be sure to invoke more gun legislation so that the poor people can't defend themselves and the rich people continue to receive the political and legal favors they are accustomed.

We might even be able to increase the law enforcement coffers by stepping up enforcement (starting in the ghetto of course)

All this time I thought you guys were supposed to be the voice of downtrodden and the representatives for the lower classes?

I guess I'm really confused as to how the three proposed laws, demonstrated to save lives, disproportionately adversely affects poor people?

Are you advocating a gov't assistance program to purchase guns?

Screening out people from buying guns/ammo who are convicted felons, or those with mental illness makes the poor more at risk how?
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 15, 2016 - 02:58pm PT
The same way adding poll taxes, literacy tests and former prisoner restrictions kept many poor and minorities from voting.

You thought those regulations were free?

(I Looked up 'gun identification' btw, if you want to know what it is, just let me know)
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Mar 15, 2016 - 03:01pm PT
You have a very interesting way of reasoning.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 03:06pm PT
I'm white, rich, and have as many guns as I really care to own

thanks for offering that information

but if you would, how old are you and what is your level of education?

thanks in advance for answering!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 04:45pm PT
Looks like the races are largely over.


YUUUUUUUUGE leads for Hillary and Trump in most everything.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 04:48pm PT
Rubio lost big in Fl, with 90% counted.

Kasich winning ohio
Looks like CNN the best place for quick reports.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 05:22pm PT
Listening to Rubot now: it sounds like he is about to drop off.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 15, 2016 - 05:34pm PT
Rubio is now out.

Wonder who he will endorse????
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 05:42pm PT
Who cares?

"Hasta la vista, Marco Rubio, nice try. Just remember, if you were ugly and your name was Mark Rube, you wouldn't have gotten to do even this."
dirtbag

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 05:47pm PT
Cnn just projected a Kasich win in Ohio.

Man I hope the convention is contested.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 05:51pm PT
Clinton owning everything. Hells yeah.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 06:03pm PT
That is AWESOME!


I like Bernie though. A lot.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 06:08pm PT
Yep, she's winning everything although it's far too early to say much about MO.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:11pm PT
Clinton is sounding really strong. Good positive message.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:12pm PT
Escopeta posted
In addition to that, we all know law enforcement is generally disinclined to enforce gun controls on middle-aged white people who otherwise aren't tangling with the law in some other fashion. So I'm good there as well.

Woot! Acknowledging white privilege in this thread.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 15, 2016 - 06:13pm PT
Die is cast.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 06:16pm PT
It looks like Michigan might've (a) gotten some Dems' attention; (b) begat some (much earned) sympathy. :)

Alea iacta est.

I like this interpretation...
"Events have passed a point of no return."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:22pm PT
There may have a been a lot of strategic voting going on too. Hard to tell. A lot of the best pollsters have abandoned the primaries.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:27pm PT
Kasich giving a really positive speech too. Grateful for that.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 15, 2016 - 06:28pm PT
I've heard that Michigan pollsters underincluded cell phone users, who tend to be young and tend to vote for Bernie.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:36pm PT
There are also internet polls and all kinds of garbage. If you listen to FiveThirtyEight's podcast you learn how thin some of this data is.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 15, 2016 - 06:39pm PT
Trump clinched Illinois.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 06:31am PT
Missouri is still outstanding on the Democratic side but it's basically a dead heat and the outcome will only serve publicity purposes at this point. They will essentially split the 71 delegates evenly. Factoring this in, Sanders is at 805 to Clinton's 1129 pledged delegates. There are 2,922 pledged delegates yet to win which means that Sanders will need to win 55% of the remaining to clinch the nomination without superdelegate support. Clinton needs 40.5% to cross the 50% mark of pledged delegates. It's largely inconceivable that she can't win 40% of the remaining vote and she currently holds a larger lead over Sanders (both in pledeged and superdelegates) than Obama ever did over her in 2008.

Trump needs 616 more delegates to win and has officially passed the 50% mark on his path to the nomination. The Republican race differs in that a number of the remaining states are winner take all AND the proportional states are not directly proportional; they have rules that award nothing to candidates polling below a 10% or 15% threshold and give bonus delegates for winning congressional districts and whatnot. This means that even though Trump is only winning pluralities and not majorities, he is more likely to pull in more than 50% of the delegates from these states if he continues to win with 35 or 40% of the vote.

The real trick with the Repubs is that the delegates pledged to defunct candidates can throw their support behind a different candidate after the first ballot! The drama! The intrigue! Still so much more to come this crazy, crazy year. Cleveland is going to be amazing no matter what happens.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 16, 2016 - 06:47am PT
Sarah Palin's convention speech should be one for the ages. It could make anything on House of Cards look tame, an all-out assault on the English language.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 06:51am PT
So true, crank. Though I doubt they will give her a prime time slot anymore.



*edit*

Boehner just came out for Ryan as GOP nominee if the first ballot fails. As much as I want this to happen I think Trump will clinch it.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 16, 2016 - 07:08am PT
I can't wait to watch the republican convention.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 07:21am PT
Obama announced his nomination for the SCOTUS.

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday will nominate Merrick B. Garland as the nation’s 113th justice, according to White House officials, choosing a centrist appeals court judge widely respected even by Republicans in hopes his choice will be considered by the Senate.

In deciding on Judge Garland, Mr. Obama picked a man who persevered through a lengthy political battle in the mid-1990s that delayed his own confirmation to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by more than a year. Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, argued at the time that the vacancy should not be filled.

Twenty years later, Mr. Grassley is again standing in the way of Judge Garland’s appointment, this time arguing as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that the next president should be the one to pick the successor to Justice Antonin Scalia, who died suddenly in February.

Judge Garland is often described as brilliant and, at 63, is somewhat aged for a Supreme Court nominee. He is two years older than Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who has been with the court for more than 10 years. The two served together on the appeals court and are said to be friends.

The Oklahoma City bombing case in 1995 helped shape Judge Garland’s professional life. He coordinated the Justice Department’s response, starting the case against the bombers and eventually supervising their prosecution.

Judge Garland insisted on being sent to the scene even as bodies were being pulled out of the wreckage, said Jamie S. Gorelick, then the deputy attorney general.

“At the time, he said to me the equivalent of ‘Send me in, coach,’” Ms. Gorelick said. “He worked around the clock, and he was flawless.”
dirtbag

climber
Mar 16, 2016 - 07:50am PT
I wish he would pick someone younger.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 07:54am PT
He's not going to get confirmed anyway.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 16, 2016 - 07:56am PT
No, he won't be so it doesn't matter. He's basically taking one for the team by agreeing to be nominated.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 10:42am PT
Yeah I was thinking about how the conversation with all of these nominees would have included serious talk about how they would likely just be a political football. His speech today was very touching and personal. He seems like the right pick from a political standpoint. I think regular people will really connect with him.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 16, 2016 - 10:48am PT
The Trump supporters and the all-or-nothing self-styled conservatives (e.g. the Heritage Foundation) continue on their quest to destroy the Republican party.

First my rag on the all-or-nothings. Just this morning, I got an email from the Heritage Foundation bemoaning the fact that some Republican senators actually voted to confirm Obama's Secretary of Education appointment. Their gripe: he supports Common Core. Don't these geniuses have access to a calendar? The acting Secretary - over whom the Senate has virtually no say - can implement everything the Heritage Foundation dislikes for the rest of Obama's term, with no interference from the Senate. Why play into the hands of the party's critics who allege obstructionism?

Round two on the all-or-nothings. That same email bemoaned Congress's trying to pass a budget rather than insisting on "conservative spending." I guess they think that the budget can be approved with a simple majority vote of both houses, without the President's signature or overriding his veto. I can't begin to say how disgusted I am with that sort of posturing that has no chance of enacting legislation. It would be far better to enact the best real budget we can now, under regular order, than to proceed with brinkmanship that can only result in enactment of another continuing resolution.

Then there's Trump. I got a call from my life-long best friend (well, he became my second-best when I got married 32 years ago, but you get the picture) because he wanted a sanity check. He told me that he would vote for Hillary if Trump were the Republican nominee. I told him my wife and I came to the same conclusion. Trump has never demonstrated qualification to lead this country. The only substantive policy he advocates is neo-isolationism and a trade war. Those who think that's smart should review the political and economic history of the 1930's. Those policies brought on and perpetuated both the Great Depression and World War II.

The Republicans still have a chance to salvage the party, but the Trump distraction has already lost the presidential election. Norton is right. We'll never get to 270.

John

Edit: I had to correct a couple of typos, one of which was doubtless a Freudian slip. I initially wrote "trade was" rather than "trade war." This probably reflected the fact that the latter would cause the former.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 10:55am PT
That Heritage Foundation thing sounds like a fundraising letter. Was it? Clinton is functionally a traditional Republican so I think there might be a lot of moderate Republicans who need to get over their sense of party identity this summer. Thanks for the honest and detailed posts.
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 16, 2016 - 01:46pm PT
The same way adding poll taxes, literacy tests and former prisoner restrictions kept many poor and minorities from voting.

Your argument is based on the false premise that owning a gun makes you safer. Once again I request any data you can present that supports that assertion.

TE
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 16, 2016 - 02:15pm PT
HDDJ, The Heritage Foundation sends an email under the name of The Daily Signal, usually covering five or so topics. Jim DeMint is no dummy, but a lot of the Heritage positions reflect the Ted Cruz type of all-or-nothing brinksmanship that produces nothing but bad headlines for Republicans. I find it a very useful daily check on the hard conservative positions.

On the left, I always try to check The Nation, which provides thoughtful and articulate views from the left. I also get the daily feed from The Guardian. Then there's occupy Democrats and Moveon.org, among others.

None of these sources are nearly as entertaining or informative as ST, of course.

John
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 16, 2016 - 02:18pm PT
Your argument is based on the false premise that owning a gun makes you safer. Once again I request any data you can present that supports that assertion.

It worked for me. Is that proof enough?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 16, 2016 - 04:51pm PT
Escopeta posted
It worked for me. Is that proof enough?

Anecdata! The core of any sound policy decision.


John- Sounds like a pretty good diet though I'm not sure why anyone would read MoveOn (and I don't know what OccupyDemocrats is). The Atlantic is doing some of the best stuff out there right now and you would probably enjoy reading some of Cotes' major pieces on race.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Mar 19, 2016 - 08:39am PT
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 19, 2016 - 08:50am PT
Ted Cruz picks Phil Gramm as his financial advisor
The very insider person responsible for the 2008 financial collapse
That's because Ted is maverick outsider, right?


Phil Gramm


As chairman of the Senate Banking Committee from 1995 through 2000, Gramm was Washington's most prominent and outspoken champion of financial deregulation. He played a leading role in writing and pushing through Congress the 1999 repeal of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial banks from Wall Street. He also inserted a key provision into the 2000 Commodity Futures Modernization Act that exempted over-the-counter derivatives like credit-default swaps from regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Credit-default swaps took down AIG, which has cost the U.S. $150 billion thus far.

http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877330,00.html
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 19, 2016 - 02:22pm PT
The very insider person responsible for the 2008 financial collapse

BwaHaHaHaHaHa! He so totally talked all those retards into buying houses with ARMS.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Mar 19, 2016 - 03:55pm PT
Didn't the most of the Democrats (in both Houses) vote for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act?
John M

climber
Mar 19, 2016 - 03:59pm PT
I thought this was worth reading..

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-americans-dont-understand-about-nordic-countries-2016-3

hopefully the republicans will read it.



what it does fail to point out is that Finland's military spending as a percent government spending is a lot lower then the US..
Norton

Social climber
Mar 19, 2016 - 04:13pm PT
Didn't the most of the Democrats (in both Houses) vote for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act?

oh, I suppose you know how to look that question up your own self

but it looks like the bill was very widely supported by majorities of both parties

On November 4, the final bill resolving the differences was passed by the Senate 90–8,[18][note 4] and by the House 362–57
wiki

in addition the wikipedia article on the legislation gives both pros and cons, with
considerably disagreement as to whether is had measurable impact on the 07 Financial Crisis as to the involvement of investment vs commercial banks
But I am sure Edward knows all this anyway
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 19, 2016 - 09:04pm PT
Reilly posted
BwaHaHaHaHaHa! He so totally talked all those retards into buying houses with ARMS.

If you really think that's what caused the financial collapse I have a sweet deal on a bridge for you.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 21, 2016 - 10:37am PT
Heh.

GOProud: Sorry About Donald Trump, America


Washington (CNN)When Donald Trump arrived at the Washington Marriott Wardman Park Hotel to deliver his first major political speech as a potential Republican presidential candidate, he looked uncharacteristically nervous.

It was February 2011. Trump appeared quiet, reserved and, in an unlikely move for the media-hungry mogul, he even scuttled press interviews to prepare for his speech.

Trump came to the nation's capital at the behest of GOProud, a small upstart group of gay conservatives who, in a Hail Mary attempt to make a name for themselves among Republicans, had invited him to be a surprise speaker at the 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference, the nation's largest annual gathering of right-wing activists.

The speech Trump would deliver to a standing-room-only crowd would help launch his stardom among conservatives and set off a long chain of events that would lead to his status as the Republican Party presidential front-runner just four years later.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 21, 2016 - 10:43am PT
^^^^Oops!!!
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Mar 21, 2016 - 11:05am PT
No, Hillary Clinton can’t be “indicted” over her email. She was fully cleared six months ago.



http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/no-hillary-clinton-cant-be-indicted-over-her-email-shes-already-been-cleared/24184/

An interesting take on this fake scandal
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 21, 2016 - 05:55pm PT

Classic political flip-flopping...

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 22, 2016 - 05:43am PT
The Arizona primaries are today. Trump should walk away with it easily and there isn't enough polling on the Democratic side to make a clear prediction for the Democrats but the high percentage of Latino voters should tilt things towards Clinton. The most recent poll only had 300 people in it and gave Clinton a 25 point lead over Sanders but 25% were also undecided.

Utah also has a primary and Cruz is forecast to win handily. The only real question is whether he can get over 50% of the vote. If he passes that threshold he will take 100% of the delegates. Analysts have pointed out that Kasich, who has no chance of winning the state (or anything at all) has put nearly $1 million of advertising into Utah which will possibly get him some delegates by keeping Cruz under 50% but will simultaneously net Trump delegates. If he's running as a Trump spoiler this seems like a pretty bad idea. If he's trying to be Trump's VP then this is a great idea.

The Democratic race in Utah is like Arizona in that the polling is crap but Sanders appears to have a lead. I look forward to my Facebook feed crowing about how important a Sanders win in Utah is while it being completely unimportant. Democratic delegates are split proportionally meaning Sanders' ability to catch up to Clinton is effectively 0 without her getting arrested (which is totally about to happen any day now, right guys? Right? Guys?)

Democrats also vote in Idaho today and polls there are hilariously absent and the one there is has a 10% error margin.



This article in Medium (originally in the Boston Globe) does a good job articulating something I've been thinking about a lot lately. As more and more jobs become automated we are faced with the reality that our current economic model gives all those profits to the owners of the robots and leaves an increasing number of people out of work. We become faced with the moral dilemma about how to handle the millions and millions of people who will no longer have real economic value. A guaranteed basic income will ensure that these people stay out of abject poverty while creating the opportunity for incredible amounts of human creativity. If you think about it we could launch a new Renaissance with Americans able to pursue ambitions based on their social benefit and personal reward instead of solely their economic value.


It looks like the Bundy family commitment to promoting bird watching has really paid off!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 22, 2016 - 06:58am PT
You can't always take that stuff on face value. There's no cost to opposing a nomination that is going to pass with or without your support and you score points with your constituents. We keep faulting politicians for mirroring our own desires. How dare they accurately reflect the moods of a petty public!
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 22, 2016 - 07:10am PT
What team do you like then? Is there another league?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 22, 2016 - 07:27am PT
Dingus posted
Yes, I get that. I don't like the teams. Sorry.

Hate the game, son. My point is that we demand that our politicians say the right things so they say the right things. What we decide are the right things changes, so they change. That doesn't mean you have to like it, I'm just saying that we like to lay blame on politicians while taking very little responsibility.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 22, 2016 - 08:20am PT
Nixon domestic policy advisor john ehrlichman on the real reason for the war on drugs:


At the time, I was writing a book about the politics of drug prohibition. I started to ask Ehrlichman a series of earnest, wonky questions that he impatiently waved away. "You want to know what this was really all about?" he asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/22/11278760/war-on-drugs-racism-nixon

Worked like a charm, too.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 22, 2016 - 08:54am PT
Dingus posted
Oooooo! Such insight!!!!! You know, all that Hope and Change business. I thought then, and I think now, as others point out the very same observation this election cycle...

That was pretty crappy analysis then, it's slightly better now. Obama at least ran on a pretty robust set of policy ideas even if his most simplistic slogans are what get repeated and remembered. I still have a bound copy of his "Blueprint for America" somewhere. "I dunno we just need change" seems to be a pretty common quote from average voters, especially those willing to swing between Sanders and Trump.


Dirt: Hot damn that's an impressive quote.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 22, 2016 - 09:03am PT
Yet, the war on guns is perfectly acceptable to some even though its more openly associated, and still tied to, Jim Crow legislation than the war on drugs ever was.

Funny how people rationalize the level of freedom they think is appropriate for others...
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Mar 22, 2016 - 09:07am PT
let's start a war on the war on guns, eh? for the blacks.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 22, 2016 - 09:09am PT
White gun toting males are horribly oppressed, always have been.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 22, 2016 - 09:14am PT
Escopeta posted
Yet, the war on guns is perfectly acceptable to some even though its more openly associated, and still tied to, Jim Crow legislation than the war on drugs ever was.

Nazis built roads, ergo all people who build roads want to exterminate Jews.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 22, 2016 - 09:16am PT
let's start a war on the war on guns, eh? for the blacks.

Actually the Jews have already done that for you here in America. (Likely moreso than the NRA who many people think is the most influential US gun support group)

You can thank them for it later, when it finally occurs that they had the right idea after all.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 22, 2016 - 09:25am PT
Hopefully you are a member then. They do more for your ability to tote that Mini 14 than the mush mouthed NRA ever will.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 23, 2016 - 05:27am PT
Primary Update:

Sanders crushed it in Utah and Idaho with 80% and 78% of the vote respectively. Unfortunately, due to Arizona being a far larger state, Clinton's 58% win there virtually nullified the other wins and Sanders only netted a total of 6 delegates against his 319 pledged delegate deficit.

Trump carried Arizona with his usual plurality taking all 58 delegates. Cruz took Utah handily, easily surpassing the 50% threshold to take all 40 of Utah's delegates but still fell further behind Trump. Kasich managed to poll double digits in both states but took home 0 delegates and his campaign is officially in "stubborn old man mode" surviving on sheer spite and delusion.

The next primary for both parties is in Wisconsin on April 5th (so long from now!) and the polling there is currently weak.


Campaign Updates:

The 2 leading Republican presidential candidates have basically been in a slapfight on Twitter regarding Trump threatening to go release embarrassing information about Cruz's wife Heidi. Let that sink in for a bit.


It looks like what he is referring to was a bout of depression and anxiety she suffered from about 10 years ago. I'm sure plenty of people would have been clutching their pearls about this 40 years ago but come on. What a snoozer. The fact that she doesn't do this annually being married to Cruz is a testament to her resilience as a person.


In the wake of the Brussels attacks, Cruz is reiterating his call for additional policing in Muslim neighborhoods in America.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 23, 2016 - 06:27am PT
If you do the math it's easily Trump v Clinton.

If this were House of Cards then maybe some fantasy scenario to deny Trump the nomination is possible. In the real world, no. His rabid base isn't going away and the GOP establishment is totally inept.


The fact that the vast majority of Republicans will fall in line and vote for this dumbnut is far scarier than ISIS, imo.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 23, 2016 - 06:40am PT
But my facebook feed keeps telling me that the race is only just beginning and that with his wins last night Sanders has a new momentum
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 23, 2016 - 06:44am PT
Get in line, DMT!! You wanna get the boot?

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 23, 2016 - 06:44am PT
They'll fall into line because they don't have any other options. #NeverTrump isn't working and they are far too disorganized to actually run an indie campaign.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 23, 2016 - 06:55am PT
That grossly oversimplifies the situation and I promise you there will be other options next time. Partisanship is a form of tribalism but it doesn't account for ideology. There will be top Republicans who vote for Clinton.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 23, 2016 - 08:27am PT
I will make sure that you have the opportunity to vote for Marco Rubio again.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 08:32am PT
Obama is one of the most consequential presidents in history, up there with FDR.

http://www.vox.com/2015/6/26/8849925/obama-obamacare-history-presidents
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 08:34am PT
But my facebook feed keeps telling me that the race is only just beginning and that with his wins last night Sanders has a new momentum

I get those, too, and of course we see it here.

If you squint your eyes enough, you can kinda sorta see it happening, but only if you squint your eyes.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 08:37am PT
Crankster posted
The fact that the vast majority of Republicans will fall in line and vote for this dumbnut is far scarier than ISIS, imo.

Posted from the safe lily white enclave of N. Tahoe. Belgians might have a different perspective.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 08:51am PT
Who would the Belgians tell us to vote for?

You think being reactionary to what happened in Belgium is the answer.
What should we do?
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 08:52am PT
Two days ago trump called for a diminished us role in nato, an alliance that by and large has worked well. You think Brussels would want that?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 09:03am PT
Like most Euros Belgium is mostly hot air and posing:


http://www.wsj.com/articles/nato-calls-for-rise-in-defence-spending-by-alliance-members-1434978193

Pretty funny that Greece spends more than any other Euro than GB.
Albania spends more than Belgium!!!!!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 23, 2016 - 09:21am PT
Looks like Belgium has spent a little too much time under the shade trees.....
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 09:43am PT
Boy, howdy, they're dangerously close to




(wait for it)






The Canadian Line.

And you thought The Mendoza Line was low?
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 23, 2016 - 09:50am PT
Two days ago trump called for a diminished us role in nato, an alliance that by and large has worked well. You think Brussels would want that?

NATO... has worked very well, but now is the time for the USA to back out some. We have troops scattered all over Europe, waiting for a Soviet Union invasion. That was a great idea 65 years ago. After the collapse of USSR in the mid eighties that threat ended.

Time to pull back some and let the Europeans take care of themselves. And what sort of a Military Alliance would not allow another members air force to fly over their country? (i'm thinking France and Turkey)

The Donald is spot on ......

dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 09:55am PT
NATO... has worked very well, but now is the time for the USA to back out some. We have troops scattered all over Europe, waiting for a Soviet Union invasion. That was a great idea 65 years ago. After the collapse of USSR in the mid eighties that threat ended.

We were the first country to call on nato for help in 2001, 10 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 10:19am PT
DMT, FYI, armed foreign aircraft fly over US soil very frequently and often discharge those arms.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 10:26am PT
Agin the Hosers or the Amigos del Sur?
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 10:39am PT
Craig Fry posted:
Who would the Belgians tell us to vote for?
You think being reactionary to what happened in Belgium is the answer.
What should we do?

Hey Craig,
Like Godwin's Law, or the race card, hyperbole renders words meaningless. I was just calling Crank out on that, and maybe because I just finished viewing some of the ISIS carnage on an English website.
No comparison to a Trump presidency, and I'm no Trump guy

I'm not sure what we should do. The problem resides in the religion of Islam and only Muslims can address and solve the problem. I pray for their success.
Check out this essay by a devout Muslim examining his own religion.

"Yet as I began to investigate the Quran and the traditions of Muhammad’s life for myself in college, I found to my genuine surprise that the pages of Islamic history are filled with violence. How could I reconcile this with what I had always been taught about Islam?"

[url=" http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/03/22/radicalization-isil-islam-sacred-texts-literal-interpretation-column/81808560/"] http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/03/22/radicalization-isil-islam-sacred-texts-literal-interpretation-column/81808560/[/url]
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 10:51am PT
These terrorists aren't fighting a Religious battle, it's totally Political

That's why we can't call them radical Islamic terrorists

No regular Muslims agree with their battle, they are killing Just as many Muslims as Christians

Regular Muslims hate ISIS or Dasch or whatever

They are doing more damage than any group could possibly do to the Muslim Religion

Call them what you want, but they are just a band of criminal crusaders bent on war and destruction for ideological purposes

Our military has 1000s of Muslims, our Police forces, teachers, scientists regular folks; we have to avoid singling them out, that's what ISIS wants, for us to go on a holy war against Islam

Let's not make it about them, we have to focus on who is to blame,
and that's the Terrorists

and not focus on what Obama didn't say or do
or if the Country deserves it or not


What do the Terrorists want?
They are at war, they will fight against ANYONE that they perceive as the enemy, and that's belligerent anti-Muslim talk and policies

and of course the countries bombing them
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:26am PT
I thought Hillary had an interesting response, even though she spoke it in what, at first, sounds like double-talk: First, she said "it's a mistake" to call it "radical Islamic terrorism," as Ted Cruz had. Then she elaborated. "You know, I call it radical jihadist terrorism because, you know, it is clearly rooted in Islamic thinking that, you know, has to be contested first and foremost by Muslims around the world," Clinton told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday.


In fact, calling all Muslims jihadists makes as little sense as saying Catholics support Westboro Baptist Church because both claim to be Christian. Even Baptists don't support Westboro.

The only case in which differentiating between Muslim and non-Muslim status in immigration or otherwise would be useful involves issues of assylum. Non-Muslims in territory subject to ISIS-type attack have an ipso facto target on their backs simply because of that status, and therefore may have a need for quicker processing to save their lives. If we're dealing with ISIS itself, though, Shia adherents are in as much danger as Christians, B'hai, and others.

While I disagree with Craig about this being a purely political terrorism, because they base their justification of terrorism on a plausible, if evil, interpretation of their relligious texts, we need to be careful to specify exactly what "religion" is involved. It's not just Islam, nor Sunni, or even Wahhabist, but a particular strain of it. We not only commit injustice when we tar with too broad a brush, but we set ourselves up for failure as well, because we choose to try to find a needle in a haystack by examining each straw, rather than using a magnet.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:39am PT
That's a snippet taken out of context and does not in any way accurately represent her very coherent thoughts on the matter. She's about to give a speech on at Stanford on counterterrorism, maybe catch it if you have the time. Doubt you'll hear anything about patrolling Muslim neighborhoods in the US.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:41am PT
The most tired, worn-out term of this election--already--is "political correctness."
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:45am PT
But, dirt, if it's labeled "PC" by the Anti-PC League it must be bad, right? And the opposite must by good?

In fact, if a candidate's only qualification is being "anti-PC", that's enough, correct?
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:46am PT
Yes, obviously.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 11:59am PT
That's a snippet taken out of context and does not in any way accurately represent her very coherent thoughts on the matter.

Your statement confuses me. I understood the context to be criticism of Cruz calling it "radical Islamic" terrorism, and stated that. She calls it "radical jihadist" terrorism, which - to me at least - clearly differentiates between Islam and radical jihadists.

Her statement about it being something that has to be contested by Muslims referred to the radical, antisocial "thinking" that purports to be Islamist, at least as I read the quote. This doesn't differ from Christians contesting the positions of Westboro Baptist Church as, in any way, representing Christian thought.

What am I missing?

Thanks.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 12:10pm PT
Fattrad wants in on this discussion:

"It is a clash with the religious-political leaders of various nations and denominations. Just ask the Imams of Pakistan what they think of democracy or the US, or the religious leaders of Saudi Arabia". On to politics, "Trump is a disaster, it will go to a brokered convention with none of the current candidates getting the nomination".

"And, a comment on ST, who are the idiots who complained about Werner, a total group of losers".....

[JE editorial comment on fattrad's last statement: It was never made clear to me if Werner is banned or simply using his time more wisely.]

fattrad and John
dirtbag

climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 12:11pm PT
Hey fatty!!!
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Mar 23, 2016 - 12:36pm PT
Interesting that those who like to compare to Muslim terrorists to Christians don't seem to come up with a better example than the Westboro Baptist Church (the obnoxious whackos who go around with signs saying things like God Hates Fags and "protesting" at funerals).
Carrying obnoxious posters and like a d#@&%ebag isn't quite the same thing as genocide, bombing, shooting, raping, destroying antiquities, is it?

Obama's best effort to call out Christian "terrorists" was to invoke the crusades. That may be an apt comparison in some ways, but it's got a little problem that you all can probably figure out . . .

From Mr. Fry:
Our military has 1000s of Muslims, our Police forces, teachers, scientists regular folks; we have to avoid singling them out, that's what ISIS wants, for us to go on a holy war against Islam
Let's see, our military has Nidal Hasan (Ft. Hood shooter).
Apparently there were lots of indications that Hasan was a muslim fanatic and could go on a terrorist rampage at any time, but the PC crowd was afraid to take any action against him.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 12:50pm PT
Fair point, Blahblah, but I was comparing Westboro and the rest of Christianity because the doctrine of Westboro is such an outlier. There are certainly more radical jihadists than there are Westboro-doctrine adherents, but that wasn't the comparison I was trying to make. I was simply trying to argue that one cannot fairly or usefully use an outlier to represent an entire population.

If we want to get into Biblical Christian doctrine, however, Jesus condemned hatred and murder equally. In fact, in a statement that has quite a bit of relevance to at least one internet forum I know, I could translate the Greek from Matt. 5:21-22 as follows: "You have heard it said of old, 'You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.' But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever calls his brother an idiot will be liable to the hell of fire." [emphasis mine]

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 01:30pm PT
The anti-planned parenthood killer was doing it out of Christian beliefs.
The guy who killed all the blacks at a church last year was affiliated with a Christian Organization.

As far as our Country goes, 100s of times more killing is conducted by Christians, fact.

Do we need to survail Christian neighborhoods and Churches

If you fear dying yes, if you want extreme blow back, then go ahead.

One or 2 crazies out of millions does not make the whole population responsible.

No Muslim should have to apologize for what some crazies did.
Not until you blah, blah, apologize for the planned parenthood killer and all the other death at the hands of Christians.

As far as the PC goes, I will have to watch all Christians for now on, we don't want to be too PC on them, they obviously want to kill, they've killed before, the bible's full of killing, rape, pillaging and other evils, that's what the bible teaches.
Take revenge, kill the heathens and blasphemous, it's in there somewhere
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 01:48pm PT
Why are the prevailing forces on the American left so incensed by a Christianity that celebrates chastity, complementary gender roles, and strict family values,
while at the same time they're promising Muslims that they will be happy settling in the very country the left strives to secularize?

Not a troll, just truly curious about that.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 02:11pm PT
WHY??
Because it's completely Hypocritical, that's why

Why are the prevailing forces on the American right so incensed by Islam that celebrates chastity, complementary gender roles, and strict family values,
while at the same time they're promising Christians that they will be happy settling in the very country the left strives to secularize?

Is there a difference?
Not in my mind
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 23, 2016 - 02:17pm PT
Check this Out Obama is becoming friends with the Donald Trump of Argentina.. get ready America the Trump train is calling you!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-obama-argentina-visit-20160323-story.html
Norton

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 02:50pm PT
Well,

the refusal of the Senate Republicans to add a 9th Supreme Court Justice could very well work against their own judicial outcome preferences

without Scalia to provide the 5-4 majority to overturn the lower courts' decisions requiring adhering to the government's law mandating contraceptive healthcare,
it is very likely the court will end at 4-4 which allows the mandate to stand
Another Justice in place could have well given the republicans the 5-4 votes to
overturn, and even if it went 5-4 to uphold that is no worse than 4-4 to uphold
Am I reading this right, John?

what is even stranger than conservatives inflicting self harm is that all the Little Sisters of the Poor had to do is sign a form saying they object to the mandate and they would be off the hook of providing contraceptive coverage, but no, they would not sign


WASHINGTON — The Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious groups want the Supreme Court to free them from the government’s requirement that they sign a form to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage to the women who work for them.

Without the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the bench, the court on Wednesday heard their pleas in a contentious hearing — likely to lead to an even split along ideological lines — in which the groups’ claim to religious freedom was pitted against the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that female employees have wide access to contraceptive services.

refusing to allow a 9th Justice in cases like this, and there are more coming up,
is like McConnell pointing a gun at his foot, firing, and then blaming someone else....
Norton

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 02:58pm PT
Dingus, you don't understand

1) it is Obama, or Obummer, never President Obama

2) he is only 50% white and his name sounds so foreign and strange and at first kinda hard to pronounce so perhaps Muslim, and Hawaii really isn't one of 50 states anyway

3) he is a Democrat, and well you know, they oppose God and Guns, and favor Gays

therefore, on general principle, every single thing he says and does must, must be
viewed with great suspicion, be immediately criticized...by the Merikan 14 year olds
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Mar 23, 2016 - 03:06pm PT
The anti-planned parenthood killer was doing it out of Christian beliefs.
The guy who killed all the blacks at a church last year was affiliated with a Christian Organization.

I'll give you the anti-panned parenthood killer and other abortion doctor murders. So add them all up and see what the number is.
You don't get the guy who killed the blacks at the church. Remember we caught you fibbing on that on in the relevant thread--the killer never made any statements that linked his killing to any religious beliefs and he never stated that he had any religious beliefs.
The best you can could come up with was a statement of someone in the church his family attended that the killer had, apparently some years before, attended the church (as a child, if I recall).

The issue is not whether any particular killer may self identify as a Christian or a Muslim or any other religion (and remember, we don't even have a good reason to think the church killer self identified as a Christian, but that's irrelevant to this point). The issue is whether the killers themselves say that their religion is their motivation for their murders.

You got anything other than abortionist murders? There may be some others, but I can't think of any. (And how many abortionist murders have their been? My 10 second Googling shows 11.)
We've got many thousands of recent murders committed in the name of Islam, together with untold rapes, mayhem, destruction, etc.

Norton--remember, if "Obummmer" renounced being a Muslim in many countries he could be legally put death--apostasy is punishable by death, and if you're father is a Muslim, you're a Muslim.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 23, 2016 - 03:11pm PT
and now helping to repair the wounds the U.S. caused in Argentina

We put the junta in place in Argentina? Really? Oh, sorry, I forgot we're
responsible for everything bad that's ever happened. Somehow I missed
how we threw people out of airplanes off the Argentine coast. But I'm
sure we were responsible for them trying to take the Falklands and I know
we ruined their economy 3 times in the last two decades because we were
mean and wanted our bonds paid back.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 03:16pm PT
You don't get the guy who killed the blacks at the church. Remember we caught you fibbing on that on in the relevant thread--the killer never made any statements that linked his killing to any religious beliefs and he never stated that he had any religious beliefs.

Wrong
You just would not accept his Christian affiliations because some right winger said he wasn't.

He said he was a Christian, he was linked to radical racist Christian groups, that's what the links I read said
So I was not fibbing, as you say.

EVERY AMERICAN that Kills is most likely a Christian, since this Country is mostly Christian.
Every murder is done by either an Christian, atheist, Muslim, Hindu or whatever.
So simple math says that Christian kill the most in America
and atheist's are last, they do the least amount of killing percentage wise
So it makes sense that Religions cause the murder rates to increase.

I didn't see the Terrorists saying they were killing because of Religion or what Mohammad said, they were killing because it's philosophical war.

maybe you can point out where they said it was for religion, since we all missed it.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Mar 23, 2016 - 03:30pm PT
Humor appreciated.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 23, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
My Dad was a Christian, and I'm not one, and he was with me my whole childhood
so what ever your father's religion was is completely meaningless
(why use it as propaganda?)

Obama was raised by his mother as a Christian, he hardly ever even saw his father
So to call him a Muslim is Pure BS
and typical of right wingers to hold on to debunked lies and spew them out every time they need them to make a point

Do you think he was born in Kenya?

Just look back in history.
Christians put millions to death if they questioned the Church's authority or promoted evolution, science or whatever
Being Gay was Illegal and put to death, Women had no rights
atrocities and murder against any minority group were common place
All until America started to become more secular, liberal and there was political push back on the influence of Christianity.

And these right wingers want to go back to the dark ages of the past Christian theocracy.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Mar 23, 2016 - 04:34pm PT
Why are the prevailing forces on the American left so incensed by a Christianity that celebrates chastity, complementary gender roles, and strict family values,
while at the same time they're promising Muslims that they will be happy settling in the very country the left strives to secularize?

People on the left have tried to make them welcome, but has anybody seriously promised Muslims that they won't face any cultural conflicts? Sounds like a straw man to me.

I would probably qualify as "American left". I think immigrants are good from an economic point and view and I generally welcome a multicultural society. But I am concerned with the affect that immigrants, who generally are more religious and conservative, have. My understanding is that Latinos voted heavily for the anti-gay marriage prop 8 and they also voted heavily against the prop to legalize pot (the full legalization not the prior medical). I think both measure were fairly close. If CA had had less immigration from south of the border, that outcome might have been flipped. A rapid, large influx can have consequences.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 05:24pm PT
I posted:
Why are the prevailing forces on the American left so incensed by a Christianity that celebrates chastity, complementary gender roles, and strict family values,
while at the same time they're promising Muslims that they will be happy settling in the very country the left strives to secularize?


Craig Fry replied
Because it's completely Hypocritical, that's why
...Is there a difference?
Not in my mind


So the right wing is hypocritical. I agree, they're politicians, it's what they do.
So when you say there's not a difference you admit the left is hypocritical?
That's kind of a milestone for you to admit that.

That's not the answer I was looking for, as I said it's not a troll. I am truly curious how this is rationalized on the left.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 23, 2016 - 05:46pm PT
Sounds Ike a commander-in-chief to me.

http://www.c-span.org/video/?407164-1/hillary-clinton-remarks-counterterrorism
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 06:13pm PT
Hey August,
Yeah, poorly worded and does sound like a strawman.
I do perceive the left as more sympathetic to Muslim immigrants than they are to devout Christian citizens.
BTW: I am somewhat agnostic on this issue

"A rapid, large influx can have consequences."

I agree, and I would imagine that many Americans of all political views feel the same. Especially after seeing the consequences in Europe.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 06:48pm PT
I do perceive the left as more sympathetic to Muslim immigrants than they are to devout Christian citizens.

wow, Larry, you stunned me with that one

personally, obviously 180 degrees differently from you, i cannot recall even one single instance in my life of the political left first, not being as sympathetic to Christian immigrants as the political right, for example. I also cannot recall the left being more encouraging or sympathetic, as you say, to Muslim immigrants than any other race, creed, or ethnicity of any immigrant group

but I admit that I don't read every possible news source so of course i could be wrong

Larry, can you help me understand from what sources you have information that leads you to conclude, to perceive that "the left is more sympathetic to Muslim immigrants than they are to devout Christian ones"?
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 23, 2016 - 07:06pm PT
Norton,
I said Christian citizens, not Christian immigrants.
Christian citizens in this country are socially conservative...ie: the people the left tends to look down upon as being non-critical thinkers, (edit)anti-abortion, God in Pledge of Allegiance, pro-gun, etc.
Doesn't take a scientific report with footnoted sources to see this.
Read any comment forum anywhere. It is the divide in our country right now.
I'm just curious how the left rationalizes the dichotomy that many perceive.

Edit:
I will give you that bigots tend to follow the right wing or Trump, not to say they are all bigots as some try to portray, but I see hypocrisy within both parties.
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
Mar 24, 2016 - 12:53am PT
MICHAEL TELLINGER FOR PRESIDENT
MisterE

Gym climber
Small Town with a Big Back Yard
Mar 24, 2016 - 01:16am PT
it's not even the end of primaries - this should get way more arm-chair red-face action before it is over!

Thanks for your high blood pressure

in support of the indeterminable consequences.

You really show your meaningless

keyboard pounding

to be a refiner's fire

of abject reactive internet drivel.
Flip Flop

climber
Earth Planet, Universe
Mar 24, 2016 - 01:29am PT
Immigrants of all kinds will grease the cogs of communication, understanding and progress.

The consequences that we all (worldwide) face are for actions already committed. Our job is to make smart actions now to proceed in the direction that we want to go.

To put it in layman' terms. Let them come and educate them about progress. Make allies.


The situation in Europe reflects a peculiar religious compromise and the fact that Muslims aren't culturally invested in the compromise. The Euros agreed to have public religious based education. Now the new wave of religious refugees enjoy religious freedumbs while living in dismal projects with minimal opportunity for advancement. It isn't surprising that there are radical youth. Europe has been dealing with this stuff since the seventies. We need to cool our little scared selves and learn to take a punch. If W hadn't been such a chickenshit he wouldn't have needed to set the world on fire.

Something something. Nobody cares.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 05:48am PT
Dingus posted
Anti-PC is the new PC. Its just more pre-qualification garbage from those who claim to be garbage-free. Laughable, actually. They're as PC as it gets.

My thoughts exactly. What could possibly be more "politically correct" than attacking Obama for not using the exact phrase "radical Islamic terrorism?"
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:11am PT
What could possibly be more "politically correct" than attacking Obama for not using the exact phrase "radical Islamic terrorism?"

I don't know, maybe YOU are dosing on just a little too much Glenn Greenwald or Abby Martin or Salon or Ben Affleck? Just a thought.

....

Anti-PC is the new PC. ... They're as PC as it gets.

Either PC or PS? (As in problem solving). It's easy to sit on the sidelines and bitch, ain't it, flip?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:17am PT
Half the time, the left are as variegated and delusional as the right.

Look no further than this site. Capice?



The non-religious tend to look down on all sorts of religious types as non-critical thinkers

Plainly there is a positive correlation.




What an embarrassment. lol
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 06:18am PT
Larry posted
the people the left tends to look down upon as being non-critical thinkers,

The number of conservatives shrieking on facebook about "low information voters," liberals not looking up good sources and the lack of critical thinking is striking. People usually think that those with differing views just aren't aware of the right information. Everyone is prone to using bad data, statistics or research because it supports their preconceived view.

HFCS posted
Half the time, the left are as variegated and delusional as the right.

Look no further than this site. Capice?

HFCS posted
I don't know, maybe YOU are dosing on just a little too much Glenn Greenwald or Abby Martin or Salon or Ben Affleck? Just a thought.

You mean like when you attacked me for reading people I either have never heard of or don't care about? That kind of delusion? Just a thought.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:21am PT
Start here.

(a) regressive left

(b) illiberal left

What a mess.


Tell me brainiac, if you don't distinguish "Muslim" from "radical islamic extremist" how does one even begin to consider the difference, the nuance, and have a conversation in public no less. Whether citizen, politician or President?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:38am PT
Lots of hyperbole going on. I just don't see what all this hair-splitting accomplishes.

I'm on the left side mostly. I don't "look down" on social conservatives. I just disagree with them on just about everything and work as hard as I can to elect people to office who oppose them.

Partisan? Hell, yes.

In 7 months we'll have an election to determine the future of the country. The most consequential vote I'll have in my lifetime, I truly believe.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:51am PT


The future first lady educating ted cruz kids..
Why hasnt the media chew that up..
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:59am PT
Sorry, Pyro, but this is the next First Lady. Big hands, too.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 07:05am PT
HFCS posted
Tell me brainiac, if you don't distinguish "Muslim" from "radical islamic extremist" how does one even begin to consider the difference, the nuance, and have a conversation in public no less. Whether citizen, politician or President?

Explain to me why that conversation is happening everywhere EXCEPT where people care about this particular phrase being used. The people who care about this politically correct term are the LEAST nuanced and the LEAST likely to make the distinction you describe. Furthermore, the distinction isn't between "radical Islamic terror" and Muslims, it's between people who employ terror as a tactic and those who don't. It's between people who endorse violence against civilians and those who don't.



Dingus: That's great. Here's Dubya to contrast http://youtu.be/MxbT11QlCe8?t=38
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Mar 24, 2016 - 07:33am PT
You know, I was going to post an opinion piece written by Michelle Bachman which tries to tie the Belgium attacks to President Obama, but it's just an unintelligible word salad.

She seems so smart...

Here's the link if anyone cares.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/obama-enjoys-cuba-while-civilization-burns/
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 08:06am PT
If disaffected teen males who failed to assimilate (if not criminals) are the acetone, then religious fundamentalism is the hydrogen peroxide.

(Or, it takes two to tango.)


Facts: 25-50 per cent of Christians are scriptural fundamentalist. 80-95 per cent of Muslims are scriptural fundamentalist.

How many Muslims "believe in" evolution? believe in creationism? are pro-science? anti-science?

Muslims no less than Christians believe in a WARRIOR god.

Support Muslim culture in the name of multiculturalism? No. Support ex-muslims and reform muslims and liberal muslims? Yes.

End of rant. Have a good one.

.....

"The people who care about this politically correct term are the LEAST nuanced and the LEAST likely to make the distinction you describe."

This sooooo telegraphs your bias. "politically correct term"? lol


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/23/reform-muslims-stand-up-to-take-on-the-ideology-of-islam.html
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 24, 2016 - 08:17am PT
$10 trillion dollars is awful spendy dancing lessons.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 08:21am PT
HFCS posted
If disaffected teen males who failed to assimilate (if not criminals) are the acetone, then religious fundamentalism is the hydrogen peroxide.

Indeed, it's their own fault they weren't accepted.

This sooooo telegraphs your bias. "politically correct term"? lol

Your reading comprehension is poor, apparently. That was the entire point of that conversation. Tell me, HFCS, if one term is considered the "right" term and another the "wrong" term to use in a political context, would insisting on the right term not be "political correctness?" How is it biased to call a spade a spade? Are you mad I'm not calling it a leverage scoop?


Brandon posted
You know, I was going to post an opinion piece written by Michelle Bachman which tries to tie the Belgium attacks to President Obama, but it's just an unintelligible word salad.

Bachman and Palin are like internet meme aggregators come to life. That isn't even an opinion piece it's a collection of saved links from Bachman's Facebook page.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 08:35am PT
Women, you have to treat like sh#t.

-Donald Trump.


Yep, he really said that.

A brutal, unflinching look at his rampant misogyny.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/03/donald_trump_has_one_core_philosophy_misogyny.html

He hates women.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 09:53am PT
The 2016 general election campaign is going to be one supremely nasty mother f*#ker. It's going to be just brutal. Ugh.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 09:56am PT
Yuuuuup
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 24, 2016 - 10:01am PT
Maybe you can get some counseling Dirt since your delicate sensibilities have clearly been assaulted. Lol.

"Mamby Pamby" is the phrase that comes to mind when considering the "safe space" intrusion of these college kids.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/337436/
Norton

Social climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 10:05am PT
Hillary beats Donald by over 10 million popular and over 100 Electoral Votes

modern day landslide

the GOP is facing a demographic tidal wave, they cannot get to 270

down ticket voting in November gives the Senate back to the Dems

The GOP keeps the House until at least 2022, divided government, nothing get done

and most everyone left church early
dirtbag

climber
Mar 24, 2016 - 10:07am PT
Oh, okay Esco.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 10:26am PT
Meanwhile, Trump supporters literally throw punches and complain about "hate" because people are invading their safe space. You know, tough guy stuff.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 24, 2016 - 10:44am PT
divided government, nothing get done

We can only hope so.....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 24, 2016 - 11:25am PT
Dingus posted
It was a quid pro quo deal, a dirty back room as#@&%e deal by incumbent dirty politicians and their partisan dogs within the respective parties. Shameful but the blame in no way whatsoever resides solely with the GOP. This was a bipartisan rip off.

Hence my contention that partisans SUCK.

How would you have it happened, exactly? I mean other than an independent group drawing the lines (that everyone would just call partisan).
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Mar 24, 2016 - 12:05pm PT
Dingus........+1

Hand that job over to a geographer.... It's called "Population Bubbles " .... A common map making tool.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 24, 2016 - 12:24pm PT
I dunno about other states but in California the GOP-favored gerrymandering of congressional districts was done as a deal within the state, between California democrats and California republicans.

California GOP-favored gerrymandering of congresional districts? How did I miss that? John Burton masterminded the Democrats' gerrymander in 1980 that's pretty much disenfranchised California centrists ever since. (For non-Californians' info, John Burton was a San Francisco Democrat). The "independent commission" that was supposed to take district boundaries out of partisan hands employed the consultants of the California Democrats, and the relative proportion of California representatives between parties reflects that bias.

I personally like open primaries in states, such as California, where so many districts are one-party districts. That allows members of the other party to show a preference for the more moderate candidate of the dominant party.

I still remember when California's nominally partisan government was really non-partisan. Earl Warren and Tom Kuchul were Republicans, B.F. Sisk (a rather conservative local congressman) and Sam Yorty (a rather conservative LA Mayor) were Democrats. That centrist, pragmatic approach to government really characterized government in most of the western U.S., but as states like California and Washington became dominated by big-city political machines, that changed for the worse. In California, at least, the "good old days" of the mid-20th century really were better. After all, that's when Yosemite climbers became world-class.

;>)

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 24, 2016 - 12:34pm PT
Exactly! It was an "Incumbent Protection Plan" that "preserved the balance of power." California was dominated by existing gerrymanders that heavily favored the Democrats. The gerrymander that you cite continued the status quo.

John
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Mar 24, 2016 - 02:30pm PT
How would you have it happened, exactly? I mean other than an independent group drawing the lines (that everyone would just call partisan).

The winner-take-all system is the problem. To the extent possible, I would rather have a regional, proportional system. So you would have a district where ten seats were up that were awarded on a proportional basis. So it would take about 10% of the vote to elect a single politician. In our current system if an alternate party (green, libertarian, Christian conservative, etc.) gets 10% across the board, they gets zero seats. With a proportional they would. If the Dems (or Reps) got 40% of the vote in that district, they would get 4 seats in that district. 10% for the greens would get one. It would better represent voters. I would limit it to 10 so that there is still a regional component.

There is no practical way to gerrymander a proportional system.

Obviously there is no hope of doing this on a national level, but I would presume that CA could do it with a voter prop for the CA legislature.
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Mar 24, 2016 - 02:56pm PT
Our state is not well served by preserving dirty partisan dog elective jobs, democrat or republican.

A huge Fing problem IMO. You get very red and blue districts that elect more wingnut politicians. Who don't compromise and don't take into account differing view points.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 24, 2016 - 06:06pm PT
An Open Letter to My Republican Friends

03/22/2016

Richard North Patterson
Novelist and contributing opinion writer

Dear Cherished Friends,

The Republican Party has become intellectually and morally bankrupt, a mockery of its traditions — corrosive to our society, our civility, and our capacity to govern. This is not a temporary condition; it is woven into the fabric of the party. Unless and until it reverses course, you should take your votes and money and walk away.

I never thought I would presume to say this. I respect that your allegiance is rooted in considered beliefs and years of loyalty which, at the beginning of my political journey, I shared. I certainly don’t think I have all the answers, and I enjoy exploring our differences. You inform me, correct me and, most generously, tolerate me. You care, as do I, about the world we are leaving the next generations.

Our friendship far transcends our political beliefs. We share each other’s celebrations, enjoy each other’s successes. I value your advice. You’ve helped me through hard times, and some of you have helped my kids as well. You are loyal friends, generous members of the community, and deeply committed parents and grandparents. My world, and the larger world, would be a grayer place without you.

Knowing you as I do, I know that you are troubled by the direction of your party. Little wonder — you are mainstream Republicans whose mainstream has run dry. But I also accept that, for you, the Democrats may not be the answer — that you see them as feckless devotees of identity politics and too much government, don’t trust Hillary Clinton, and believe that Bernie Sanders would drive us off the fiscal cliff. I’m not writing to quarrel with these beliefs. Nor do I suggest that unchallenged dominance by the Democrats would serve the country well.

But to compare the two parties at this time in our history is to indulge in false equivalency. For rationalizing the GOP’s pathology by responding with a partisan tit-for-tat is not adequate to the circumstances. The sins you perceive in Democrats are the usual ones — misguided policies, ill chosen means for dubious ends, and the normal complement of rhetorical dishonesty and political squalor. However mistaken you may find Clinton and Sanders on the issues, their debate is addressed to the world as it exists and therefore open to a sensible critique. The squalor to which the GOP has sunk, an alternate reality rooted in anger and mendacity, transcends mere differences in policy, threatening the country with profound, perhaps irreparable, damage.

This is not simply about Donald Trump. For Trump is not the result of forces which will come and go, but of a deterioration within the Republican Party that has been accelerating for years. The GOP has become a Frankenstein monster, assembled from dysfunction, demagoguery, myopia and myth, nurtured in a fever swamp where lies and hysteria kill off reason. Nothing better will arise until you help drive a stake through its heart.

One of our ongoing disagreements has been about the nature of the party, and where you fit within it. With respect to GOP extremism in areas like climate denial, gun violence or reproductive rights, you often say, “but I’m not like that.” But the party is. You may be moderate in your views; the party is not. Even candidates with temperate instincts must go along to survive, or meet the fate of Jon Huntsman, mocked for publicly accepting climate change and evolution.

Long since, the GOP killed its moderates and trashed everything they stood for. It has replaced respected figures like William Cohen, Richard Lugar and John Danforth with rigid ideologues like Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, and social illiterates like James Inhofe, Jeff Sessions and Richard Shelby. On issue after issue, they have embraced an orthodoxy rooted in extremism and divorced from fact. These dynamics forced Mitt Romney to win the nomination by running so far right that he could never get back. And what was the lesson learned among the party base? That Romney was not nearly extreme enough.

In short, the Republican Party no longer belongs to you, or you in it. 2016 has proven the point.

I saw this coming not because I’m uniquely prescient, but because I began writing reality-based political novels 20 years ago. I hung around with party pros, consultants, lobbyists, donors, pollsters, officeholders and political partisans, some of whom became my friends. Bit by bit, I saw the party sell out its agenda for short-term gains with disastrous long-term consequences. Eventually the GOP’s train wreck became inevitable — no longer a matter of if, but when.

How did this happen? Start with the relationship between the party establishment and its base. Your family, and mine, occupy a privileged slice of American society. Not so for most members of the GOP electorate. They are folks that few of us know very well: evangelicals; modestly educated whites threatened by economic dislocation; and people whose distrust of government partakes of paranoia.

Economically, they are not natural allies of the party of business or its wealthy donors, who tend to focus on tax cuts and free-market principles irrelevant to the base. So in exchange for pursuing its economic agenda, the party offered evangelicals a faith-based vision of America: barring abortion, banning gay marriage, and giving government preferences to fundamentalist religious institutions. Why should business people care, the reasoning went, when we can rally these voters with promises which, however illusory, cost us nothing?

But as “promise keepers,” the party failed its fundamentalist flock. Abortion remains legal; gay marriage became a right; the constitution prevents government from enshrining religious preferences as law. So there was nothing to stop evangelicals from noticing that their own lives were often harder and less secure.

Ditto other members of the middle and working classes. The real causes of their woes are globalization, the Great Recession, the housing crisis, and an information society which marginalizes blue-collar jobs. But the GOP never addressed these complex forces with any kind of candor — let alone proposed solutions like job retraining and educational access for their kids.

Barren of ideas for helping its base voters, it resorted to blame-shifting and scapegoating — of government, Obama, illegal immigrants, Muslims and other minorities. Instead of looking forward, the party indulged a primal nostalgia for simpler times, an imaginary white folks’ paradise which can never be resurrected.

Some of this was shameful. The GOP countenanced a race-based birtherism directed at our first black president, giving Donald Trump a political foothold. It nurtured xenophobia that targeted all Muslims at home and abroad. It pretended that illegal immigrants were poisoning our economy. It aped the mindless masters of talk radio and trafficked in conspiracy theories. It embraced Tea Party dead-enders who claimed that shutting down the government, at whatever cost, was the only answer.

In Congress, the party resolved to deny Obama reelection by grinding the legislative process to a halt, then blaming him for gridlock as if its tactics played no role. Political polarization polluted foreign-policy — as when all 300 Republicans in Congress turned the Iran deal into a political wedge issue, shunning the careful consideration it deserved in favor of shrill and simpleminded denunciations. In the world of the GOP, our many and complex problems had but one misbegotten cause: that Barack Obama was president.

So-called mainstream Republicans competed to fan the flames of outrage, poisoning political discourse. Typical was the establishment’s darling, Marco Rubio, who claimed that Obama was not simply wrong, but trying to destroy America as we know it. Republican politics became not faith-based, but hate-based.

For the Republican base, nothing changed.

Except, of course, their rising anger, stoked by yet more empty and diversionary anti-Washington rhetoric that only deepened their sense of impotence. Focused on the donor class, party leaders charged the Democrats with “class warfare” against the less than embattled rich, while still failing to acknowledge through substantive policies the very real struggles of its rank-and-file. The election in 2014 of yet more Republican senators and congressmen made no difference in the lives of the people who supported them.

Not unreasonably, the base came to believe that our governmental and financial institutions — including the Republican Party — were controlled by an elite that was indifferent to their plight. And so demagogues like Donald Trump and Ted Cruz became the agents of their frustration and despair. Like the sorcerer’s apprentice, the party lost control.

Among the casualties was the agenda most dear to the Republican establishment. Its insensitivity to the base has eroded support for free trade. Despite its claims of fiscal probity, the GOP continued its meretricious complaints about deficit spending — for which, as ever, it blamed the Democrats’ self-serving rhetoric about protecting Social Security and Medicare — while proposing tax cuts for the wealthy that would explode the national debt. And consider this: How do tax cuts at the top benefit the struggling middle and working classes? And wouldn’t slashing or privatizing Social Security further threaten their fragile place in our society?

But set aside the party’s disingenuousness with respect to the economic and fiscal concerns that, in many cases...
to be continued

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-north-patterson/an-open-letter-to-my-repu_b_9497274.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Mar 24, 2016 - 08:07pm PT
I'm not a big fan of these political threads, but the Richard North Patterson letter Craig Fry posted part of above is something everyone on ST should read. Everyone. Regardless of their political stance.

And not just the part in Craig's post, but the whole thing. Click the link to the original in huffpost. It's worth your time. And more than just worth you time, it's important.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-north-patterson/an-open-letter-to-my-repu_b_9497274.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 24, 2016 - 08:08pm PT
I agree
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Mar 24, 2016 - 09:07pm PT
The Republican Party has become a Frankenstein....Where lies and hysteria hide reason...Nail on the head...!!
thebravecowboy

climber
The Good Places
Mar 24, 2016 - 10:31pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 25, 2016 - 05:01am PT
Dingus posted
How would I do it? I'd ignore socio-economic data, urban vs rural, north vs south, race or ethnicity, immigration status or sex identification; none of that should play a role.

So what happens when you wind up with a 90% white government in a 47% white state? Or when rural interests are completely unrepresented because most districts have significant urban areas? You're ultimately just trading partisan biases (or at least the appearance of them) for others.

August posted
The winner-take-all system is the problem. To the extent possible, I would rather have a regional, proportional system. So you would have a district where ten seats were up that were awarded on a proportional basis. So it would take about 10% of the vote to elect a single politician. In our current system if an alternate party (green, libertarian, Christian conservative, etc.) gets 10% across the board, they gets zero seats. With a proportional they would. If the Dems (or Reps) got 40% of the vote in that district, they would get 4 seats in that district. 10% for the greens would get one. It would better represent voters. I would limit it to 10 so that there is still a regional component.

You're describing something more like a parliamentary system which I think is long overdue. In other countries if the people lose confidence in the government or if the government no longer can agree on anything it fails and triggers elections. Our constitution virtually cements a 2 party system.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 25, 2016 - 09:37am PT
DMT, you have yet to demonstrate that the existing gerrymander in 2002 favored Republicans in congressional districts. All your sources say is that it preserved the status quo. They don't describe the status quo. Please provide some evidence that the existing congressional districts favored Republicans.

I completely agree, however, that the current districts result in election of extremists, because the winner of the primary of the dominant party faces no serious opposition. Extremists dominate both California parties, so only candidates capable of placating those extremists have a chance of winning the primaries - at least without open primaries and voters of the minority party smart enough to vote for moderates of the opposition party.

Finally, on a completely different front, the Sixth Circuit loses patience with the three years (and counting) of the Obama administration's stonewalling on the IRS discrimination against conservative groups:

http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/16a0069p-06.pdf

The opinion for a unanimous court beings as follows:

"KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. Among the most serious allegations a federal court can address are that an Executive agency has targeted citizens for mistreatment based on their political views. No citizen—Republican or Democrat, socialist or libertarian—should be targeted or even have to fear being targeted on those grounds. Yet those are the grounds on which the plaintiffs allege they were mistreated by the IRS here. The allegations are substantial: most are drawn from findings made by the Treasury Department’s own Inspector General for Tax Administration. Those findings include that the IRS used political criteria to round up applications for tax-exempt status filed by so-called tea-party groups; that the IRS often took four times as long to process tea-party applications as other applications; and that the IRS served tea-party applicants with crushing demands for what the Inspector General called “unnecessary
information.”

Yet in this lawsuit the IRS has only compounded the conduct that gave rise to it. The plaintiffs seek damages on behalf of themselves and other groups whose applications the IRS treated in the manner described by the Inspector General. The lawsuit has progressed as slowly as the underlying applications themselves: at every turn the IRS has resisted the plaintiffs’ requests for information regarding the IRS’s treatment of the plaintiff class, eventually to the open frustration of the district court."

I guess the continuing stonewalling isn't news, since ABC, NBC and CBS failed to report it.

John
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 25, 2016 - 09:52am PT
However mistaken you may find Clinton and Sanders on the issues, their debate is addressed to the world as it exists and therefore open to a sensible critique. The squalor to which the GOP has sunk, an alternate reality rooted in anger and mendacity, transcends mere differences in policy, threatening the country with profound, perhaps irreparable, damage.

I'm sorry, Craig, but that statement summarizes why few Republicans will take the open letter seriously. The world as Bernie and Hillary see it has at least as much unreality as that of Ted Cruz or John Kasich. It's Donald Trump about whom the letter hits closer to the mark, but a majority of Republicans reject him. Unfortunately, winner-take-all rules allow someone with a plurality the possibility of piling up enough delegates to winthe nomination over the majority of the party.

I find it worthwhile to analyze why Trump phenomenon takes places with Republicans, not Democrats. I hear the Trumpians proclaim that they're bringing in new voters - many of whom were nominally Democrats -to the Republican tent. My problem stems from the beliefs of those "new voters," because I find those beliefs at odds with the conservative values that have defined my party heretofore.

Again, the letter is worthwhile, but don't expect Republicans to take it as Gospel. The intro I quoted above demonstrates the author's own blindness to the sins of the Democrats.

John
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 25, 2016 - 09:58am PT
Excellent letter, Craig. Spot on.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Mar 25, 2016 - 10:03am PT
I couldn't get past the first three condescending unctuous paragraphs.
That guy makes a living as a writer?

I'm going for a hike.
Curt

climber
Gold Canyon, AZ
Mar 25, 2016 - 10:24am PT
Again, the letter is worthwhile, but don't expect Republicans to take it as Gospel.

Indeed. If recent history is any indicator, Republicans will simply ignore it--much as they do global warming, evolution and other rationally based input.

Curt
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 25, 2016 - 10:37am PT
John posted
Finally, on a completely different front, the Sixth Circuit loses patience with the three years (and counting) of the Obama administration's stonewalling on the IRS discrimination against conservative groups:

It baffles me how you manage to get sucked into some of these stories despite their shaky foundations and largely resolved conclusions.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 25, 2016 - 12:04pm PT
Hahaha. Oh man. http://www.facebook.com/Clisare/videos/1300330343316826/
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 25, 2016 - 12:07pm PT
What is the candidates stand on Toddlers??

Jorroh

climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 12:08pm PT
"IRS discrimination against conservative groups"

Totally agree John....they should also be looking into IRS discrimination against other Tax cheats as well.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 01:17pm PT
With the IRS, I recall Lois Lerner first publicly apologized specifically to conservative groups, then as a witness took the 5th on the grounds that she would possibly self incriminate.
This raises absolutely no skepticism with partisans of the left.
The left then turns around and without proof calls the targeted groups tax cheats.
Yikes, now that is what I call faith based.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Mar 25, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
That is great ,Fritz.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Mar 25, 2016 - 01:44pm PT
While you're debating tax cheats don't forget the corporations that don't pay taxes and hide their money offshore while the American peon middle class pick up the slack to pay the missing tax revenue...another form of discrimination
Norton

Social climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 02:41pm PT
Regarding the "Wall Street Bailout"

think back to 2007, the economy had not only officialyl fallen into Recession, as defined by negative growth, but was also in a free fall, losing 500,000 jobs a MONTH, in fact the US economy was in the worst Recession since the Great Depression of the 30s.

Not only were mortgages not being properly underwritten but also the new class of
financial packages known as CDOs.

And predictable enough, to some, read the Big Short, these exploded.

I fully understand the anger over the "why should Wall Street be bailed out and not me"

Putting that emotion aside, IF you really knew how bad the large financial institutions'
losses were and if you really understood the very very likely massive and perhaps complete destruction of the US economy and maybe your own job, then you might understand that yes Wall Street and the biggest US banks DID have to bailed out.
And yes, it was the right thing to do.

Bernie Sanders was wrong to vote against it and Hillary Clinton was right to vote for it.
The risk of not getting it passed was too far to high, it was the "right" thing to do.

Could the financial crisis have been avoided or at least greatly mitigated?

Yes, imho, but not with Republican control of the Presidency, House, and Senate,
Because to them, markets are like puppies and children and should be "free" and allowed to seek their own level without "burdensome government regulation".

Conservative philosophy of leave it alone - was emphatically proven dead wrong.

I have enough disgust with the simply awful effect that conservative social policy has on many US citizens, but when one considers their economic philosophy, there
simply is no defense for voting Republican anymore. End of my personal rant.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 02:45pm PT
Norton: spot on, but I will add that to his credit, President Bush realized that massive government intervention was needed to avert a catastrophe. At least he was flexible at that critical moment.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 25, 2016 - 02:46pm PT
I think we should ask good ole' double-barrel Joe Biden about gun control.

He has such great advice on these things. He's kind of like a toddler, right?
dirtbag

climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 02:58pm PT
I don't think so. President Bush will rank as one of the all time worst presidents, but if we had President Cruz, forget about it, he wouldn't have done a damned thing. I will give President Bush credit for this and attempting to change immigration laws, in spite of his party's rabid right wing base.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Mar 25, 2016 - 03:43pm PT
[quote]
You're describing something more like a parliamentary system which I think is long overdue. In other countries if the people lose confidence in the government or if the government no longer can agree on anything it fails and triggers elections. Our constitution virtually cements a 2 party system./quote]

I have mixed feelings on parliamentary systems. You could elect a House that had some type of proportional system, like I described, and still directly elect the president. They can be separated.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Mar 25, 2016 - 03:43pm PT
Escopeta- ?

Norton- Agree but it pissed me off! Messy triage, political solutions had to be done.

There's been a huge surge of conservative 501c's (phony nonprofits). They are disproportionately spun from cooperations and their teams of tax attorneys. They act as political attack dogs to advance their agenda and are clearly breaking the rules of their bullsh#t, tax exempt status. It's called "Dark Money" for a reason.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 04:07pm PT
Norton: spot on, but I will add that to his credit, President Bush realized that massive government intervention was needed to avert a catastrophe. At least he was flexible at that critical moment.

Dirtbag, you are talking about President Bush signing the first TARP legislation that congress passed I assume?

if so then yes, it was the right thing to do, also I believe that he left bailing out the US automakers and savings millions of jobs to the incoming President Obama

my point, or criticism of President Bush, is that the financial crises occurred not only on his watch but also when he could have done something possibly hugely effective about it, in large part i feel because he was distracted from domestic issues do to his
focus on waging his own invasion and Nation Building massive blunder in iraq

I guess I have trouble congratulating someone for trying to fix something that he himself was very responsible for creating in the first place....
Jorroh

climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 04:25pm PT
I think it's important to point out that the Clinton Administration played its own part.

The best you can say is that they did little or nothing to change the trajectory of economic policy and philosophy that had begun during the Reagan years.

The worst, that they pushed forward that trajectory with gusto. And when you really distill all the contributing factors right down, its market fundamentalism that was the root of the mortgage meltdown.
Clintons economic team was fully market fundamentalist (the worst sort actually...wall street market fundamentalist) and it bothers me that some democrats still can't acknowledge that.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 25, 2016 - 04:36pm PT
I agree, Norton!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 06:54am PT
It is not a dirty FOX News word. It is not a dirty partisan Republican word.

Say it liberals... "radical Islamic terrorism."

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLIbDaqPXG8

Call it what it is... "radical Islamic terrorism" ... or risk losing the election.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:21am PT
A few liberals here come to mind: Norton, Crankster, Dr. F., Nature.

Can you guys say it? "radical Islamic terrorism"? (EDIT: Or is it "giving in"? See below.)

FOX news doesn't own the term.

They do NOT OWN the term. (Nor did they invent it.) When liberals cede this term to Trump and gang, or to Cruz and gang, or to O'Reilly-Hannity, they only empower them and their politics. Please wake up LIBERALS and get in the game on this issue.

So lets hear it... radical Islamic terrorism... radical Islamic terrorism... radical Islamic terrorism.


Half the solution to a problem is correctly identifying the problem. Corollary: Half the solution to a problem is correctly NAMING the problem.

Bears repeating...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

Would love to hear from liberals here (other than climbski2) who disagree either with Bill Maher or me regarding this term.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLIbDaqPXG8
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:39am PT
I say it all the time
"radical Islamic terrorism"

But I'm far from PC

and I'm not in the Presidential admin
they don't say it for one reason
They don't want to enflame racial division

They need to be PC
Billions of people react to what they say

and to react to them not saying it is SOoooooooo petty
that us liberals think it's not worth disccusing
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:42am PT
Thank you. Craig.

Yes, I understand why a Dem politician, esp any caught up in this crazy partisan stew, is shy about the term. Then again, probably what, 99 per cent of liberals or leftists or Democrats are NOT politicians? They need to get with it, raise their game, imo, and NAME that CORE COMPONENT in the problem complex... radical Islamic terrorism.

I have no problem distinguishing between Islam and "radical Islamic terrorism."
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:50am PT
I really don't care,
and I think it will have no influence on the elections

I think terrorism is a very small problem for our Country
We overreact way too much, even when it happens 1000s of miles away,
all the little cowards go nuts and think we need to lock down the Country
What kind of BS is that?

I worry more about the right wing policies being implemented
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:53am PT
I'll give it a go...

First, recognize that, whatever you call it, we currently have a military and intelligence strategy to try to defeat ISIS and others. The President and the Joint Chiefs aren't sitting on their hands. Obviously, we are reluctant to send in U.S. ground forces in large numbers. Those reasons (Iraq) should be obvious. Ok, maybe not to Republican presidential candidates who are eager to exploit any successful terrorist attack for political advantage. Defeating a cowardly enemy that hides among the civilian population isn't easy. Anyone that tells you it is is lying.

As for the term...I get Maher's point...to a point. The presidents's rationale is correct; we need Muslim countries on our side and anything that suggests the U.S. is at war with a religion is counterproductive. Disarming a GOP talking point is secondary. Everyone knows the only reason they do it is to call in the question the legitimacy of the president, constant dog whistling his religion and birthplace.

So, give in to them and start using the term "radical Islamic terrorism"? No. First, that wouldn't change anything. You think everyone would make nice? Nope. Maher's wrong. He should take tango lessons.

Hillary uses the term "radical jihadists". Good enough for me, as is her strategy to defeat them.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 07:54am PT
I really don't care, and I think it will have no influence on the elections


Well, I'm squarely in Maher's camp on this one.

If weeks before the election, there is a radical Islamic terrorist event here in the states... a so-called 9/12... it could very well end up... President Trump.

In such a case, was "radical Islamic terrorism" really such a minor component in the mix? in the politics? and really nbd?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:01am PT
So, give in to them and start using the term "radical Islamic terrorism"?

You sound like hddj, as if the Republican Party invented the term. Talk about ceding power.

I've used the term for 15 plus years, probably even before the 9/11 attack. What's it going to take? another one in the ports of LA, a nuclear one, before the nomenclature and conversation and problem solving transcend partisan politics. Sheeesh.

The rest of your post, I agree with.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:02am PT
Do you really think if the President used the term like you want that it change anything?

Get real

Everything he does is bad, these people will always find fault no matter what he does
even if he killed off everyone one of "radical Islamic Terrorists", a terrorist attack could still happen.

and everything Reagan did was good, and they will go to their graves being right wing apologists
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:04am PT
"Do you really think if the President used the term like you want that it change anything?"

I am not saying the President. Sheesh.
The President is doing and saying just as he should.

Suggest watching the rest of last night's show. Maher's guest, Ian Bremmer, imo, states the case just right.


In the campaign, the liberal Democratic side could emasculate the right on this particular issue by not ceding the term and plainly distinguishing between Islam (religion) and radical Islamic extremism (violence/terrorism). Yes, I do think most folks, those on the lib left side especially, have gained a point in their development would they could understand this.

.....

you can't make me say those PC words of yours...

That's hilarious.

"radical Islamic extremism"

Now they are PC? I thought they were not PC? Now they are PC?

Hahaha, maybe we could all agree they are pc-related. lol

.....

Hillary uses the term "radical jihadists".

Only started recently, I think. PROGRESS.

Well it's a start.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:23am PT
I think we need to use the words "radical Christian terrorist" every time a Christian kills more than one person

I just don't understand the hypocrisy of letting these Christians go around killing without labeling them for what they ARE!

They put millions to death for most of their early History, they were a church of terror, and they spawned off many terrorist groups like the KKK, the Nazis, the W. Bush Admin and so on,
luckily we became a more secular Nation and took away most of their authority.

But they still have terrorists that live today, killing people that they see as against Christian principles
WBraun

climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:34am PT
The entire root radical Islamic terrorism was created by the western coalition as psyops to destabilize the Mideast for their criminal resources theft.

Simultaneously the western coalition uses the same psyops to maintain the high fear ratio onto the unsuspecting public to keep their very own military industrial complex going.

This provides economic development which drives the illusionary industrial nations economic base at the expense of the greater humanity.

The whole thing is a powerful criminal enterprise by criminals to humanity masqueraded as human advancement .......

Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 08:43am PT
Welcome back Werner ;-)

Craig posted
They put millions to death for most of their early History, luckily we became a secular Nation and took away their authority.
But they still have terrorists that live today, killing people that they see as against Christian principles

Well, if you want to go tit for tat and back in history, how do we define the president's buddy Bill Ayers?
Where are Christians killing people now?

Crankster made some good points.
We have policies in place, we don't have the political capital to send a massive force into the region, and we need Muslim countries on our side.

The fix for Radical Islamic Terrorism is within the Muslim culture itself. We need to support the vast majority of good Muslims to cure the festering cancer of the jihadists.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:04am PT
?

Neither myself nor any other "liberal" I know has any problem at all in saying "radical Islam"

Seriously i don't know of anyone who does not use that term to describe the basterds

Presidents and State Department Diplomats operate on a close personal level with Muslims and so they have to really watch what and how they say things, as Craig said
WBraun

climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:06am PT
The fix for Radical Islamic Terrorism is within the Muslim culture itself.

Nope, it's within us ourselves since we created it thru rape of the planets resources to feed the illusinary high standard of living in the western industrialized nations.

All the terrorism is the exact karmic reaction to our own selfishness.

The American way ..... point the finger at someone else and take no responsibility.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:06am PT
When does anti-PC become so accepted it become PC?

Why worry about a term anyway? Time to come together against a common enemy. We know our differences, what do we have in common?


Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:14am PT
WBraun posted:
Nope, it's within us ourselves since we created it thru rape of the planets resources to feed the illusinary high standard of living in the western industrialized nations

Everything in our own individual realities starts within. Striving to better ourselves first makes the world a better place.
The Muslim culture must fix itself. We are perceived as outsiders to those cultures. We must support the good people within those cultures as best we can.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:53am PT
When you use memes like Lois Lerner and Bill Ayers to use against Democrats it really demonstrates that you get your info from the Fox News Bubble world.

Bill Ayers says he wished he was buddies with Obama, but he wasn't.
Do you say both him and Obama are lying?

Lois Lerner was doing other things that she didn't want to expose
just because she took the fifth does that mean she was really targeting conservative groups?
She was appointed by W. Bush and voted Republican, so you are way off.
I heard she was investigating Chuck Grassley and it wasn't good, so was covering it up for the Damn Republicans. Lois Lerner is meaningless to any real debate, it's just another lame Right wing club to bash away with

and to insinuate that Karl Rove and the Koch Brothers should be able to funnel millions of dollars through not profits that are supposed to be Non-political is somehow good, and the IRS shouldn't be looking at them is pretty idiotic

The IRS should shut them down, but now they can't because of the right wing reactionary fools that supported Rove and his evil empire to use all the money they want TAX FREE to influence politics



What about the planned parenthood shooter, he did it because of his Christian beliefs,
The guy that killed a bunch of blacks, the killer of Dr. Tiller the baby killer, KKK in our police, our military uses Christian authority to kill, they have all kinds of Christian memes that they try and force feed the GIs

Do you even listen to the real News?
Norton

Social climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 09:58am PT
This map shows just how much of a landslide Mrs Clinton would beat Mr Trump by based upon current polls if the election were held today

Her margin of victory would be even greater than Obama's over both John McCain and Mitt Romney


Larry Nelson

Social climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 10:59am PT
Craig,
Sometimes I wish I could be as certain in my beliefs as you are.
Unfortunately I harbor too much skepticism for that much faith.

Edit:
I don't have TV in my house, so no Fox News.
Don't listen to Limbaugh.
I do not defend the Republican party and their self destruction.
Free your mind and try a different tack.

Edit:
You have climbing accomplishments and a great cactus hobby.
Put this political BS in perspective
...it's just Hollywood for ugly people.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 26, 2016 - 11:48am PT
I'm the most skeptical person here
I have no faith in anything
I have understanding of ideas and facts

The right wing so called skepticism is really more of what real skeptics call denial

I was just exposing the truth about Lois and Mr. Ayers
and discussing Christian fundamentalism values

You seem to know about them because you brought up the subject
if you deny listening to right wing media,
then we have to ask, where did you get your info on them?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 26, 2016 - 02:33pm PT
USA Today's web site has a fascinating article on a North Korean video just posted on Youtube. The subject matter is a North Korean nuclear attack on Washington DC and a 4 minute video montage of other defeats they've inflected on us. Yes! There is also a link to the video.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/03/26/north-korea-propaganda-video-depicts-nuclear-attack-washington/82293486/

dirtbag

climber
Mar 26, 2016 - 02:47pm PT
Yes, Larry, the spiel about Bill Ayers being his buddy was seriously overinflated by the right. It was part of the lefty/sharia/foreigner meme that millions of righties bought hook line and sinker.

Welcome back Werner!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 26, 2016 - 03:01pm PT
Larry posted
Put this political BS in perspective
...it's just Hollywood for ugly people.

It's not like the winners have any real power...right?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 26, 2016 - 03:08pm PT
Werner is back!!! Woot!!!

HFCS posted
So lets hear it... radical Islamic terrorism... radical Islamic terrorism... radical Islamic terrorism.

It's not surprising that you ran to a religious bigot like Maher for support.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Mar 27, 2016 - 12:10pm PT
After conversations with my aunt, she just changed from registered Republican to a Bernie supporter when she figured out that the issues she cares about are what he will best represent.

She just changed her voter registration to Democrat.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 27, 2016 - 12:30pm PT
She just changed her voter registration to Democrat.

tell your aunt congratulations from all of us who believe what she believes

that her new Democratic party fully supports the rights of women to make their own decision with their own bodies with Republican men wanting to pass laws that force them to do what women do not want to do

that her new Democratic party is not afraid of everyone being encouraged and emboldened to vote, unlike Republicans who feverishly pass laws requiring 90 year olds who have voted for 70 years to now get new state ID's or not vote, unlike Republicans who are so afraid of non white people voting that they pass ID laws to stop them and limit the number and location of voting places in minority communities

unlike Republicans who pass laws that allow discrimination against people who prefer the same sex, just this week in the Carolinas

unlike Republicans who come right out and state that they not only oppose an increase in the minimum wage but even oppose a minimum wage

I could go on and on telling your aunt about her new political party but I have to go
to the guitar store and get some new strings......
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 27, 2016 - 02:36pm PT
let's be reminded of what the voters really voted for..

Norton B.S chart
Norton

Social climber
Mar 27, 2016 - 03:00pm PT
Well pyro

If it is "bs" then exercise your powerful intellect and explain how the Dems
have been whopping your Repups by such large margins in the Presidential elections.

Huh?
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Mar 27, 2016 - 05:30pm PT
Pyro, Re; Your first map. Think of where the population density is, and maybe it'll make a little more sense to you.

Maybe, but I have my doubts.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 27, 2016 - 08:36pm PT
Well pyro

If it is "bs" then exercise your powerful intellect and explain how the Dems
have been whopping your Repups by such large margins in the Presidential elections.

Huh?

NoryTON I work long hours would have responded much quicker you MAP is BOGUS!

Norton and his CREATE A MAP!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 05:48am PT
Pyro- Do you know that land mass is not the same as people, right? Deer can't vote.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Mar 28, 2016 - 06:00am PT
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 28, 2016 - 06:10am PT
Soooo, Norton. How about it.

Pyro has called you out.

Your map that you posted. Let's have the truth, did you create it or was it copped off some news website as is?

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 06:31am PT
According to Trump, America hasn't been great since 1900.

TRUMP: No if you really look at it, it was the turn of the [20th] century, that’s when we were a great, when we were really starting to go robust. But if you look back, it really was, there was a period of time when we were developing at the turn of the century which was a pretty wild time for this country and pretty wild in terms of building that machine, that machine was really based on entrepreneurship etc, etc. And then I would say, yeah, prior to, I would say during the 1940s and the late ‘40s and ‘50s we started getting, we were not pushed around, we were respected by everybody, we had just won a war, we were pretty much doing what we had to do, yeah around that period.




My friend Karyn on her most recent pregnancy and how she has decided to terminate it because the fetus has an incredibly rare and likely unsurvivable heart defect.

Coincidentally, today I read an article in The Washington Post about a law passed in Indiana that will not allow mothers like me to make this choice. What kind of world are we living in where we do not trust mothers to make the best choices for her family, her baby and herself? It has always been my belief that God and Science are deeply connected. God is in everything therefore God is in Science. I am so perplexed by people who point to their religion as the reason for creating these laws when it is so clear it is politics and deep misogyny. Our hearts are broken. We feel we are living in a nightmare. I have not slept since Wednesday. The idea that a woman in my country suffering the way I am suffering would not have access to care close to her home and support network is unacceptable. No one wants to make these choices. No one. This is not a negligent, unloving or flippant choice.This is one of the most heart wrenching moments of our life. I have had a second a trimester miscarriage. I know how awful I will feel physically ( not to mention emotionally, spiritually and psychologically) for weeks. My body will be in a postpartum state with no baby in my arms. My milk may come in. And I will walk around empty still looking visibly pregnant to the world.

I have always been pro-choice. I was raised in a pro-choice family. But I have thought much more about this law as it pertains to women collectively than to me. We must change the story of Abortion. Abortion is not just people ending their unwanted pregnancies. And this is why I am sharing such a personal private moment in my life. Because my personal is deeply political today.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 07:43am PT
The Georgia governor just announced he would veto the "Religious Freedom" bill passed by the legislature. The fact that multiple multi-billion dollar businesses threatened to leave the state if he didn't might have had something to do with it.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 07:48am PT
It's not surprising that you ran to a religious bigot like Maher for support. -hddj

"a religious bigot like Maher"

Laughable. So pathetically misinformed.

Really, what more is there to say when your post speaks so much for itself.

EDIT

Except... You hddj are proof - apparently from the liberal side- that partisan politics is now so shallow and virulent and feckless one can't even have a high school level conversation in these ideas and subjects.

Atheist god help us.



So now I know what quartile of the left hddj trumps from. Thanks.


I've grown so sick and tired - more BORED actually - of this "layer of liberal obscurantism" that surrounds these important topics. Important topics that existed long long before this shallow and virulent American partisanship grew into what we see today.

Bill Maher a religious bigot? lol
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:12am PT
Pyro has called you out.

Your map that you posted. Let's have the truth, did you create it or was it copped off some news website as is?

Escopeta Norton had fun making a false map then believed the MAP!
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:15am PT
Here hddj, why not educate yourself in this matter....

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWNv97yq4Fc

FYI (1) Asra Nomani is a leading voice in the world for reforming Islam (you know, the Islam currently at war with itself?). (2) One of her biggest obstacles she says: the so-called "regressive left." (Of which Ben Affleck is the poster boy.)

Hmm, which mantra you like best?

(1) "Improve liberal democracy through education."

(2) "Improve liberal democracy through consciousness raising."



Beta: hddj, maybe back away from salon.com otherwise partisan politics for awhile? Maybe read some science books? Sagan?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:15am PT
HFCS posted
Bill Maher a religious bigot? lol

Maybe you don't understand what "bigot" means? Or maybe you just don't know who Bill Maher is?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:18am PT
Really, you post at a level no higher than the tweets of Trump. At least that's the impression so far.

Aughh, you've bored me.


Maher is no more a religious bigot than Dawkins, Tyson or Sagan. You know these people? Or Asra above.


If you have any evidence of Maher as a religious bigot, let's hear it. Otherwise the charge is baseless and you're just pumping bullshit for partisan sake.

Bill Maher is a religious critic, fully justified, because religions need criticism on at least a half dozen fronts, whether it is Christianity or Islam or some other iron-age era superstition peddler.

Grow up.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:18am PT
Thanks for illustrating clearly to everyone what media-centric world views do to people. You keep ranting about things that I have no knowledge of. You are apparent sick of something that you are projecting as vehemently and energetically on the world (and onto me) as you possibly can. Maybe take it down five or six notches? You aren't even arguing with me you are arguing with some fictitious personally created liberal straw man in your head. Take it easy.


*edit*

Responding to your edits: Maher's a bigot. He prejudges people based on their religion. He has no objectivity on the issue and even made a movie dedicated to the subject. Lumping in Sagan with Dawkins and Maher is absurd and even Dawkins is probably a cut above Maher. He clearly appeals to your need to smugly condescend to people but I generally find his views and criticism of religion and religious people to be poorly thought out and quick to generalize in a way that were someone talking about race or gender would draw swift condemnation from Maher.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:21am PT
about things that I have no knowledge of

My point exactly.

Why not dig into things a little deeper before spouting off.

You aren't even arguing with me

God, you're just full of bullsh#t. Is it just this week or all the time, that is what I'm trying to discover here.

I'm all for... ad ideam (to the idea) instead of ad hominem.

You're the one who called Bill Maher the "religious bigot"? (I think it's last page of this thread.)

lol

fictitious personally created liberal straw man in your head

Straw man?

You did or did not call Bill Maher a religious bigot? The name calling points points to fundamental differences, hardly your "fictitious personally-created" straw man argument.

Who are you? O. M. G.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:26am PT
HFCS frothed
My point exactly.

Why not dig into things a little deeper before spouting off.


Salon.com and Ben Affleck. I know little of these things that you are so eager to ascribe to me. I'm not spouting off about any of them and I'll leave it to you. I've seen plenty of Bill Maher though.

HFCS posted
I'm all for... ad ideam (to the idea) instead of ad hominem.

You sure about that?

If you have any evidence of Maher has a religious bigot, let's hear it. Otherwise the charge is baseless and you're just pumping bullshit for partisan sake.

Do you not understand what "partisan" means either?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:29am PT
I know little of these things

Yes, this is apparently very true.

You know what, I'm bored now.


Have a good one.


For the millionth trillionth time...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vln9D81eO60

So far, you remind of Ben Affleck.


The way one educates himself in this matter is to (actually) read up the literature in the follow-up to this Maher Harris Affleck (even Cenk Uygur) exchange. Otherwise one's pretty uninformed / misinformed. Those are the facts.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:31am PT
Oh no. Wait. Come back. Preferably after you get a dictionary.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:39am PT
Agreed. It's become "something I'm against." People can't even define it all they know is that it's "something liberals do that I hate."
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:39am PT
"Maher's a bigot. He prejudges people based on their religion. He has no objectivity on the issue and even made a movie dedicated to the subject. Lumping in Sagan with Dawkins and Maher is absurd and even Dawkins is probably a cut above Maher. He clearly appeals to your need to smugly condescend to people but I generally find his views and criticism of religion and religious people to be poorly thought out and quick to generalize in a way that were someone talking about race or gender would draw swift condemnation from Maher." -hddj

Seriously, you could write for salon. lol
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 08:43am PT
Thanks!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 28, 2016 - 08:58am PT
God, you're just full of bullsh#t. Is it just this week or all the time, that is what I'm trying to discover here.

How was your nap Mr. Van Winkle?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 28, 2016 - 09:20am PT
Bigotry has nothing to do with facts, its defined as an intolerance of those holding different opinions. Maher has plenty of reasons to believe what he believes, but they are intolerant views that do not allow for the validity of people of faith and he takes great pains to make that clear whenever given the opportunity. One can rationally hold the view that religion can be and has been used for dangerous purposes without concluding that all religion is dangerous or that all religious people are crazy/stupid. Maher has frequently expressed those types of views.
John M

climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 09:32am PT
Bigotry has nothing to do with facts, its defined as an intolerance of those holding different opinions. Maher has plenty of reasons to believe what he believes, but they are intolerant views that do not allow for the validity of people of faith and he takes great pains to make that clear whenever given the opportunity. One can rationally hold the view that religion can be and has been used for dangerous purposes without concluding that all religion is dangerous or that all religious people are crazy/stupid. Maher has frequently expressed those types of views.

bingo..
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 10:51am PT
"sounds like HFCS's kind of guy" -Milktoast

Bill Maher is my kind of guy. Proud to identify with him.

Milktoast, you're hilarious.
Milktoast, the guy who's got no beliefs ( by his own admission and proud), can't tell a Wahhabi from a wallaby.

Note one man's critic is another's "bigot". One man's challenging criticism is another's "insulting" criticism.

It's so so easy for partisans to chuck around "bigot" and "islamophobe" and "racist". Partisan zealots all the more so. Too easy. Why not raise your game?

Did you learn anything from the afore Asra Nomani video? Did you even bother?

.....

Moose, there was no name-calling or swearing or yelling on my part. Certainly not to ST's norms, so I don't know what you're talking about.


btw, "bigot" has its roots squarely in religions. Ironic how it's now being used outside religious circles by nonreligious people against nonreligious people.

(2) I haven't heard of Maher attempting to get people ostracized from town or arrested for working on the Sabbath; or refusing to buy from the good ol time Christian shoppes; let alone condoning the chopping off of heads or the throwing of gays off buildings.

So far he's only exhibited my kind of religious criticism. He draws the lines perfectly.
John M

climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:04am PT
Really, you post at a level no higher than the tweets of Trump. At least that's the impression so far.

perhaps you didn't directly call him an idiot, but you certainly implied it. Is it tame by ST standards? Perhaps.. but that doesn't make you a saint.


People might listen more to what you said if you didn't drip sarcasm and superiority.

....

Dingus is right about politically correct. It goes both ways. OH my goodness, Hillary didn't use the term you want her to, so she is weak. Thats being politically correct. You are trying to force her to use terms you accept as "okay".
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:05am PT

.....

"Dingus is right about politically correct. It goes both ways."

Duh.


John M, I thought we had agreed several years ago to stop addressing each other. -As the conversation was totally feckless if not utterly boring and tedious.

I liked that arrangement.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:16am PT

(1) "imaginary fictitious ideas" Now is that bigotry or criticism? bigotry or fact?

(2) "defining ourselves tribally" Now is that inaccurate or accurate?

(3) "We have to get out of this game..." I don't know, sounds secular and innovative and progressive to me. Sounds challenging, not "insulting" to me.



One anthrope's meat is another's poison, eh?
John M

climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:21am PT
trying to build a single, viable global civilization

and it will never happen as long as people disrespect others beliefs.
John M

climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:22am PT
(1) "imaginary fictitious ideas" Now is that bigotry or criticism? bigotry or fact?

responding to edits:

You can not prove a negative. Ie.. you can not prove that God does not exist. Hence.. it is not a fact.

Edit: Thus.. "no god" is a belief. Which makes it your religion.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 11:53am PT
by your own proud admission, Milkdrool, we could look it up
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 12:02pm PT
thx for the noon chuckles, milkdud.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 12:54pm PT
"killing religion"

Yeah, right O, milkboy, you can always score points with THAT one in a religious country with religious sympathizers.

21st century thought: Try replacing religion. By way of bringing new ideas and new understandings and new attitudes to beliefs and belief systems. That's what it's all about, Milk. Yes, the 21st century is powerful enough to do just that. In fact, it's already underway. Only the intellectually and culturally blind cannot see it. Change in belief is ongoing, every day now.

Go ahead, keep thinking in terms of your "killing religion". O'Reilly does too. Great way to score those points with the Old God faithful.
John M

climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 12:59pm PT
Change in belief is ongoing, every day now.

nothing new about that..
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 28, 2016 - 01:15pm PT
I can't resist, I guess I'm on a roll.

Bill Maher, critic or "bigot"?

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUc2bSQfKQs

Raheel Raza, yet another champion of reform Muslims, secular Muslims, liberal Muslims, who has appeared on Bill Maher in recent weeks.

Umpteen million Muslims in Muslim majority countries only want the chance to question their religion and, if it's what they want to do, leave it without risk of being hanged or hacked to death.

Bill Maher supports their cause. How about you?

.....

Now hddj's stance (last page) was...

"I know little of these things"

will this change, I wonder.

By the numbers...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSPvnFDDQHk


Keep the charge, Bill!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 29, 2016 - 07:07am PT
Moose posted

People believe in unicorns, Santa Clause, reincarnation, and whatever they can imagine. So, because I don't believe in their creations it makes me a believer??? No, those things don't exist until proven otherwise. The same applies to the thousands of gods people believe in.

But, to most religious people faith/religion is something out of bounds. I can accept that. I don't want to insult people of faith. But, if a religion/belief has a negative impact on other people (anti femism, anti gay, kill the infidel) I will speak against that belief. Bill Maher is a comedian, so he exaggerates. And, like I said before, his religious guests were comfortable with him. He is no bigot.

You make Maher's error that the problem is the religion as opposed to the violence. To use your dismissive analogy, if I stated that unicorns had called upon me to destroy western civilization and I started quoting My Little Pony cartoons would you insist that belief in unicorns was a real danger?

Excusing Maher for exaggerating for comic effect is completely without merit when it comes to religion. I've watched his shows many times. He doesn't temper his message when he's not trying to be funny. He sometimes makes some decent points but they often get lost in the untempered and unapologetic condescension that he enjoys so frequently.

You don't have to believe in the existence of god to allow for the possibility of god. I see many atheists such as Maher making the same logical fallacies that they accuse religious people of making. John M is correct that you cannot prove a negative. That doesn't mean you should believe something in the absence of proof, but insisting that it doesn't exist without proof is equally as absurd and judging people for their belief (as Maher does) is by definition bigotry. Just because Maher makes it cool to do so doesn't change that.
WBraun

climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 07:49am PT
This IS such bullsh!t this Sam Harris and his babble.

Get rid of Lindsey Graham and John McCain and you'll solve 90% of the whole ISIS bullsh!t in Mideast and Ukraine.

These two criminal war hawks are masquerading as Americans but are truly just plain cowards.

These two criminals are responsible for so much damage to America with their covert criminal operations thru military, the corrupt military industrial complex, and thru criminal covert operations.

All these are quietly carried out at billions and billions of dollars spent by the American people unknowingly.

Obama can't stand these and the military hates them too.

You've been 0wned by these criminals ......
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 29, 2016 - 07:50am PT
You don't like Ladyboy Graham? What's not to like? lol
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 29, 2016 - 08:22am PT
There was a very interesting interview from On the Media last week with an French journalist who was a prisoner of Daesh for almost a year. He made some points about how Daesh and Al-Assad were in a symbiotic relationship as well as how building up the threat Daesh poses suits their narrative. Worth a listen.

In the wake of the Brussels attacks, European leaders said the entire continent is at war with ISIS. French journalist Nicolas Henin wrote in The Guardian, "If we adopt a militaristic, warlike vocabulary, there will be no way back from that. We will strengthen our enemies." And he should know. Henin was held hostage by ISIS for nearly a year in 2013.

He speaks with Brooke about his experiences in Syria (where he was held with Jim Foley, John Cantlie, and others), and what he sees as our deadly misperceptions of ISIS.

Henin is also the author of Jihad Academy: The Rise of Islamic State.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Mar 29, 2016 - 08:24am PT
10 buck say's Hillary will go BYE BYE!

She will be given the opportunity to do so quietly or go down hard by Comey. Watch! AND, her CLEARANCE will be pulled due to her inept operations of the bs basement server and multiple Security Breach" Violations of her unauthorized use of her "UNSECURED" personal Blackberry in the Mahogany Room and several other "SECURE" locations. She won't have a choice.

Comey won't let her get away with B.S...

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 29, 2016 - 09:05am PT
Public sector unions just won a major victory at the Supreme Court.

A ruling in the teachers’ favor would have affected millions of government workers and weakened public-sector unions, which stood to lose fees from both workers who objected to the positions the unions take and those who simply chose not to join while benefiting from the unions’ efforts on their behalf.

Under California law, public employees who choose not to join unions must pay a “fair share service fee,” also known as an “agency fee,” typically equivalent to members’ dues. The fees, the law says, are meant to pay for collective bargaining activities, including “the cost of lobbying activities.” More than 20 states have similar laws.


And Trump's campaign manager was just arrested for the alleged assault of a Breitbart reporter.

Trump campaign manager Lewandowski charged with battery

Florida police have charged Donald Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski with simple assault in connection with an incident earlier in the month involving a reporter.

Police in Jupiter, Florida, said Lewandowski surrendered Tuesday morning to face a misdemeanor charge of battery, NBC News reported. He is scheduled to appear before a judge on May 4.

A surveillance video released by the police appears to show Lewandowski grabbing Breitbart News reporter Michelle Field as she tried to ask Trump a question during a March 8 campaign event.

The police report stated: "Lewandowski grabbed (Michelle) Fields' left arm with his right hand causing her to turn and step back." Fields showed police her left forearm which "appeared to show a grabbing-type injury," according to the investigating officer.
"Mr. Lewandowski is absolutely innocent of this charge," Trump said in a statement. "He will enter a plea of not guilty and looks forward to his day in court. He is completely confident that he will be exonerated."

"He was not arrested," campaign communications manager Hope Hicks said.

Note that Trump's campaign is trying to say that we "wasn't arrested" because he turned himself in.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 09:13am PT
Different folks, different strokes, eh Moose?

See ya on the slopes!
John M

climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 09:22am PT
So comedy is an excuse to promote hatred? Bill Maher is an egotistical pompous man who has a thin veneer of respectability which he calls comedy while he does the wink wink to his followers of hate. When I was a pissed off human I used to love him. When I got over being pissed off I saw through him. For political comedy give me Jon Stewart any day.

For moose...

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/newly-discovered-fossil-reveals-when-siberian-unicorns-last-roamed-the-earth









(wink).. LOL
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 29, 2016 - 11:26am PT
Looks like the Secret Service doesn't understand that more guns = more safety.

No Guns Allowed at Republican Convention, Secret Service Says

The Secret Service said it would forbid attendees to carry firearms at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July, neutralizing a debate that had put pressure on the candidates to take a side on the issue.

“Only authorized law enforcement personnel working in conjunction with the Secret Service for a particular event may carry a firearm inside of the protected site,” Kevin Dye, a spokesman for the agency, said in a statement Tuesday.

The debate over whether to permit guns at the Quicken Loans Arena in the second-largest city in Ohio flared in the past week after an online petition appeared on Change.org, taking issue with the arena’s anti-weapons policy in a state that allows “open carry” of firearms.

“This is a direct affront to the Second Amendment and puts all attendees at risk,” said the petition, which had gathered more than 50,000 signatures by Tuesday morning.



Just kidding. Obama is just plotting Donald Trump's assassination, obviously.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 11:51am PT
Looks like the Secret Service doesn't understand that more guns = more safety.

Meh, what would the secret service know about safety?
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Mar 29, 2016 - 05:21pm PT
It makes sense that Ted Cruz will be on the banned Washington Madam's customer list.

D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/dc-madams-attorney-says-call-log-bombshell-could-upend-presidential-race

I always find it the most fun, when the most holy among us are found to be big-time sinners.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 05:27pm PT
Meh, what would the secret service know about safety?

yeah, and what would they know about guns?

how exactly is the secret service supposed to protect the political candidates at
a convention in which people are allowed to carry loaded handguns?

can I get a 14 year old to explain this?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 29, 2016 - 06:50pm PT
I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic, Norton.


Fritz posted
It makes sense that Ted Cruz will be on the banned Washington Madam's customer list.

Cruz isn't going to be the nominee anyway. It's a moot point.
Norton

Social climber
Mar 29, 2016 - 07:00pm PT
I know Dirtbag was being sarcastic.

I was following up with a question to whom he was responding to, that ok?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 29, 2016 - 07:54pm PT
I like Bill Maher and I enjoy all kinds of different comedic perspectives

Do you really have be so judgmental at comics that say what they want?
Can't you pick on the other 80% that are way worse.

What they say doesn't influence my reality, it's either funny or not
Let it go, look at every perspective, educate yourself to be able to discriminate

I like to be able to laugh at the unconventional
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 30, 2016 - 05:22am PT
Craig posted
Do you really have be so judgmental at comics that say what they want?
Can't you pick on the other 80% that are way worse.

Who is way worse than Maher on religion? Again, Maher doesn't just make exaggerated, edgy jokes on the issue he then turns to the camera and says "but seriously..." and makes earnest, long winded statements that are completely intolerant and obnoxious. Why apologize for or minimize the boorish behavior of someone just because you like some of the other things they say? You can enjoy his ideas or comedy and still criticize him. In fact, I would say that the only way to demonstrate ideological consistency is TO call people out for this behavior. It is exactly that sort of tribalism that stands in the way of authentically addressing a lot of the issues we have. I see pro-Sanders liberals invoking gender stereotypical criticisms against Clinton all they time. Should we really tolerate this behavior just because someone is on "our side" when it comes to partisan politics? This is exactly the kind of "but he says what he thinks!" that Trump supporters use to excuse their permissiveness for their candidate's statements.




Richmond, Ca. has started paying high-risk people to not commit murder and many other cities are looking at replicating the program.

RICHMOND, Calif. — The odds were good that Lonnie Holmes, 21, would be the next person to kill or be killed in this working-class suburb north of San Francisco.

Four of his cousins had died in shootings. He was a passenger in a car involved in a drive-by shooting, police said. And he was arrested for carrying a loaded gun.

But when Holmes was released from prison last year, officials in this city offered something unusual to try to keep him alive: money. They began paying Holmes as much as $1,000 a month not to commit another gun crime.

Cities across the country, beginning with the District of Columbia, are moving to copy Richmond’s controversial approach because early indications show it has helped reduce homicide rates.


Trump has declared he will no longer stick to his pledge not to run as a third party candidate if he loses his bid for the Republican nomination. Likewise, Kasich has stated that he will not support the nominee if it is someone he feels is harming the country.

Donald J. Trump said on Tuesday night that he no longer vowed to support the Republican nominee if it isn’t him, despite a loyalty pledge that all Republican primary candidates signed last year.

“No, I don’t anymore,” Mr. Trump said at a town hall forum on CNN when prompted by the moderator, Anderson Cooper. “No, we’ll see who it is.”

When Mr. Cooper pointed out that Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, Mr. Trump’s chief rival for the nomination, had walked up to the line but not crossed it in terms of saying he wouldn’t support the nominee, Mr. Trump replied, “He doesn’t have to support me.”

The senator — whose wife Mr. Trump threatened to “spill the beans” about after a “super PAC” formed to stop his candidacy ran an ad featuring an old photograph of his wife, Melania, a former model — stopped short of saying he wouldn’t support Mr. Trump. Instead, Mr. Cruz said that such a situation would not come to pass because he will be the nominee.

Gov. John Kasich of Ohio was more explicit, saying that if the nominee is someone who “is really hurting the country and dividing the country,” then he just wasn’t sure. Pressed by Mr. Cooper as to whether he was saying he thinks that is what Mr. Trump is doing, Mr. Kasich declined to elaborate.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Mar 30, 2016 - 07:30am PT
Who is way worse than Maher on religion? Again, Maher doesn't just make exaggerated... -hddj

Who are you, the Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio of the Left? What a truly sad and embarrassing post and description particularly if in any way you represent leftist or liberal politics.

"about things that I have no knowledge of..." -hddj

That's right. You know nothing it seems outside of YOUR "media-centric" world. Either regarding Islamic religion or ME politics or Bill Maher.

Maher has interviewed Aayan Hirsi Ali to Jimmy Carter to Bernie Sanders on his show. All thoughtful and friendly and forward moving pieces. Have you watched any of them?

What about the afore videos I posted where Maher supports ex-muslims and reform-minded Muslims. Did you give enough of a damn to watch them. He's been concerned about and in support of these oppressed people for years.

Regarding the afore videos (which are representative of Maher's interests regarding religion and the Middle East), what did we hear from hddj ? Crickets. Not a peep. Why? How come? These videos and dozens more are proof in the pudding that Maher has a serious side, is concerned and fully on top of these important issues.

It's a real busy day for me otherwise figuratively speaking I love to hang out here and tear you a new as#@&%e or two. From what I see you really deserve it.

And I'm sure John M, with his high acumen, will jump in here any moment to add his two cents. (Yesterday calling Maher an as#@&%e in his post, then revising, then going on to say how he thinks differently now because he's a changed person, no longer a "pissed off human". lol)

"I know little of these things..." -hddj


Damn straight. That's for sure at least in this particular exchange.

Some would rather just post - and post and post and post - it seems rather than advance their understanding.

This place has grown excruciatingly boring in the last couple years largely because of silly people (silly political hacks?) like you.

Beta: Go to Twitter, hddj. Don't just check out the number of Maher's followers - that' pretty superficial granted - but more importantly WHO follows him.

Who are your (quality) followers, Hddj?


PS

I've never ever used this (apparently effective) grease monkey script here at ST - not once - but for the first time ever you are giving me second thoughts about doing so - particularly if I want to continue to participate, read quality posts in quality time from fellow liberals and not here such rampant bs from sam.e
John M

climber
Mar 30, 2016 - 09:29am PT
He is an as#@&%e dude. I am just trying to not use those words anymore. But a spade is still a spade, no matter what words I or anyone chooses to use to describe it.

change isn't black and white. It most often happens slowly.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 30, 2016 - 11:22am PT
Bill Maher isn't a bigot because religious people follow him on twitter also: reasons


hahahahaahahaahuaghuaghuagluagluuuhgasiodaisojids


HFCS I've generally been ignoring you but this got a good laugh. Thanks, buddy. Never stop posting.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 30, 2016 - 06:19pm PT
I heard this on the internets
May be trouble for Cruz

D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race
Judges 'are letting people vote blindly,' gagged lawyer says

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/dc-madams-attorney-says-call-log-bombshell-could-upend-presidential-race

Why would they gag him??
we really need to know exactly who has called the DC Madame

If they don't reveal this to the media immediately, we will just have to assume the worst
And it is Cruz
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 30, 2016 - 06:38pm PT
If they don't reveal this to the media immediately, we will just have to assume the worst
And it is Cruz

Or Hillary
Norton

Social climber
Mar 30, 2016 - 06:47pm PT
Or Hillary

?

please help me understand how you figure Hillary's phone number would be associated with a Washington "brothel"?

thanks
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Mar 30, 2016 - 06:48pm PT
We need to know now
Who is this person?
or the speculation will just go Werner!!
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Mar 30, 2016 - 08:17pm PT
please help me understand how you figure Hillary's phone number would be associated with a Washington "brothel"?

They called her looking for Bill. Duh.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 31, 2016 - 05:19am PT
MH posted
It will be more than amusing if the Republican nomination is decided by the courts - especially if it is decided by the Supreme Court, as seems increasingly likely. Particularly if the decision is a 4-4 tie.

I'd guess this is unlikely. Any court decision would almost certainly revolve around the legality of private entities to organize as they wish and that's something you're not going to see a traditional partisan divide on.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 4, 2016 - 07:48am PT
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-35918844

Panama Papers: Mossack Fonseca leak reveals elite's tax havens


The thing I love more than anything on this story is the fact that in a couple of the articles, the only reason any countries are interested in following up is to get any owed back taxes from the citizens that might have used the tax havens.

Because, as we know, the only reason for government to exist anymore is revenue generation. .Gov has gotta get their money!

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 4, 2016 - 08:30am PT
Sanders supporters are losing their goddam minds because he picked up a couple of delegates in Nevada after the county elections which might "flip" Nevada to a Sanders "win." I find it particularly ironic that a group of people incensed about the "voice of the people" not counting in regards to superdelegates are so excited about having potentially gained an advantage based on party insiders voicing their opinions after election day.


SCOTUS just clarified their viewpoint on "1 person 1 vote" and ruled that people not eligible to vote can be used in calculating congressional districts.


blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Apr 4, 2016 - 10:58am PT
SCOTUS just clarified their viewpoint on "1 person 1 vote" and ruled that people not eligible to vote can be used in calculating congressional districts.

Bu-bu-bu-but I thought SCOTUS couldn't do anything because those mean Republicans aren't letting Obama put his favorite hard core liberal on the Court!
Norton

Social climber
Apr 4, 2016 - 11:11am PT
well blah blah

it seems the Republicans have shot themselves in their own foot

this time by making it harder for the SC to overturn lower court decisions

5-3 is harder to get than 5-4 when you lose a reliable right wing Scalia

twice recently now 4-4 have allowed lower court's decisions to stand, great example just last week when unions won a major victory at the Supreme Court

can't see how McConnell figures President Hillary Clinton appointing a justice is any different than President Obama's, but then he doesn't seem to figure very good
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 4, 2016 - 11:20am PT
McConnell is counting on stealing the election

so they have to dump Trump first
and then install a new Republican dupe because Cruz is unsuitable and called him a liar,
which will win with their election fraud system,
and he will appoint whoever Mitch decides will be able to carry the load of being a far right wing anti-constitutionalist liar like Scalia

Trump gives poor little Mitchy so new many problems that he has to deal with, why couldn't JEB! stick it out to the end, he would have been so easy to install as their hand maiden.
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
Apr 4, 2016 - 03:26pm PT
Norton repeat this 100 times and maybe you'll get it . . .
"Conservatives will NOT be better off with another liberal on SCOTUS, Conservatives will NOT be better off with another liberal on SCOTUS, . . ."

I don't meat to rag on you too badly as we all make mistakes, but this silly fantasy you've constructed that somehow the 4-4 split decisions we now have are hurting conservatives more than 5-4 decisions against them would is just 100% nonsense, it's not worth engaging in a debate.
I'm trying to help you understand this in a lighthearted way, but you're trying my patience.

I'll try one more time:
The conservatives lost a vote with Scalia's death and went from having a 5-4 majority (in most cases) to a 4-4 tie. They won't be helped by going from a 4-4 tie to a 4-5 loss.

This is not to say I support the Repub strategy of not giving Obama's nominee a hearing (I don't), but that's another matter.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 4, 2016 - 05:44pm PT
The black robes are suppressing freedom of speech by taking over mass media and oppressing any opposition.

Well, what goes around comes around. The liberals took over mass media
and screwed things up so now they get to see what it's like from the
other side. The Christmas mass attacks in Germany went largely unreported
according to my nephew who is living there. In Sweden the huge crime wave
being fueled by the muslim immigrants is almost completely unreported as
is the fact that the police do not even go into the muslim areas which is
the same as in France. People are getting pretty tired of that sh!t.

Off topic, Moosie, but The Economist published an interesting story about a
large study done about Europeans' views of other Europeans and life in other
countries and everybody seems to think Poland is the worst place to live in
Europe, even worse than Greece. At least in Greece it is warm, I guess.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 4, 2016 - 07:48pm PT
you don't get it, do you blah blah?

Two recent SC decisions went AGAINST your "conservatives"

including a biggie, a union 4-4 tie that does not overturn the lower court

do you not understand this, the morons in the Senate you vote for are screwing themselves, take some time, think on this, then more time
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 4, 2016 - 07:53pm PT
New North Carolina anti-LGBT law secretly impacts the state’s minimum wages and other labor rights issues, ALEC sponsored legislation that is being introduced in other states

Sold as keeping transgender people out of women's bathrooms, it's really restricting the minimum wage, minority rights, abortion restrictions and 1000 other poison pills brought to you from the Republican conservative leaders and the Koch brothers

http://wncn.com/2016/03/25/new-north-carolina-law-impacts-states-minimum-wages/

GREENVILLE, N.C. (WNCT) – The bill passed by lawmakers Thursday putting a stop to Charlotte’s transgender ordinance includes language that impacts more than just the LGBT community.

It also allows the state to have control over minimum wage rates, meaning local governments can’t set their own.

The portion of the bill doesn’t change the minimum wage; it doesn’t directly affect what people will make. What it does do is take away another option.


“That’s another sign to show that the state of North Carolina doesn’t care about certain individuals, the working class people,” he said.



North Carolina’s LGBT law may have impact on women, minorities
HB2 sections on minimum wage, state legal filings affect all workers

One black lawmaker says he was unaware of HB2’s broader impact

Activists say LGBT equality is divisive issue among African Americans

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article69527867.html#storylink=cpy

HB2 limits the rights of North Carolinians to file workplace discrimination complaints under state law. For the past 30 years, a North Carolina law has allowed workers to sue their employers over “wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.” It appears HB2 eliminates that.


It's all about having the Religious liberty to screw whomever the religious sensitive find offensive or low lifes
and a republican excuse to slip in any corporate friendly law that will screw some other voiceless group, like the poor and dwindling middle class.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 5, 2016 - 05:12am PT
blahblah posted
Bu-bu-bu-but I thought SCOTUS couldn't do anything because those mean Republicans aren't letting Obama put his favorite hard core liberal on the Court!

Fortunately, the justices put more thought into their decision than you do into your posting because the ruling was 8-0.

blahblah posted
I'll try one more time:
The conservatives lost a vote with Scalia's death and went from having a 5-4 majority (in most cases) to a 4-4 tie. They won't be helped by going from a 4-4 tie to a 4-5 loss.

This is not to say I support the Repub strategy of not giving Obama's nominee a hearing (I don't), but that's another matter.

Thank you having no problem dispensing with idea that Republicans believe in vetting justices based on their qualifications and not based on ideology.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 5, 2016 - 08:05am PT
Employers have stuck with health care coverage despite predictions that many would abandon it and put people on the exchanges after Obamacare was passed. I personally would have welcomed that change but it was sold as a negative at the time.

The US is cracking down on tax inversions (paywall) in an effort to keep tax dollars and jobs at home.

Cruz and Sanders are projected to win their respective Wisconsin primaries today. National media has made it sound like a massive turning point for Trump, mostly because of the terrible week he had leading up to it. For Sanders the question will be "win by how much?" given that it's still all about the delegates.
dirtbag

climber
Apr 5, 2016 - 11:31am PT
The GOP has been strong in southern states, but apparently they've decided they want to be on the wrong side of history and voting demography by enacting hate laws.

It will be interesting to see whether their anti-gay marriage platform plank will be revived in 2016.
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
Apr 5, 2016 - 11:35am PT
It is a momentous time in our country, with possible horror or really positive reforms in our future. I don't in any way want to diminish the seriousness of that.

But this is funny.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 6, 2016 - 06:06am PT
Thanks for the video, Nut. Will catch it later.


Sanders won Wisconsin by about 13 points and netted 14 delegates against his pledged delegate deficit leaving him 249 behind Clinton. Sanders will need to win 65% of the remaining pledged delegates to pull ahead of Clinton. I've heard this means winning 57% of the vote which I am unclear on but assume there are some bonus delegates awarded for various things that are unclear. The next big contest is in New York 13 days and it sounds like the candidates have agreed to another debate in Brooklyn.

It should be noted that Hillary Clinton continues to have a larger pledged delegate lead over Sanders and Obama ever had over Clinton in 2008.

Cruz took the lion's share of Wisconsin's delegates, making a contested Republican convention much more likely.

George Mason University renamed their law school after the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia but then had to scrap the name because the acronym worked out to be "ASSoL."

Pfizer and Allergen had to scrap their merger, intended as a tax inversion by Pfizer, due to new rules to deter such activity.


High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Apr 8, 2016 - 08:52pm PT
re: the civil war in Islam
re: bigots, bigotry

The TWO MOST PROMINENT Islamic critics in the world today, one an ex-muslim and the second a reformed liberal Muslim.

Perhaps hddj will watch it? and conclude religious criticism doesn't amount to bigotry.

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV_GMeZ_XmA



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maajid_Nawaz
dirtbag

climber
Apr 9, 2016 - 12:06pm PT
More trouble in Republican la-la land?

34% of Trump's supporters say they would not vote for another republican candidate:

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X60B3


I have a feeling that Hillary hatred would prevail and cause some of that 34% to get behind the Republican nominee, but a lot would depend on whether Trump would step aside graciously or encourage his supporters to boycott the election.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Apr 9, 2016 - 10:19pm PT
Boycott? Is that what you do in between the riots?
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Apr 10, 2016 - 03:22pm PT
Gross and racist? Bigotry?

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceGqB4raTZo

I Wonder If Glenn Greenwald or Ben Affleck Will Tell This Saudi Journalist She’s “Gross” and “Racist” -Hermant Mehta

"I Wonder If hddj Will Tell This Saudi Journalist She’s a bigot." -hfcs

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/04/10/i-wonder-if-glenn-greenwald-or-ben-affleck-will-tell-this-saudi-journalist-shes-gross-and-racist/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 11, 2016 - 05:09am PT

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/07254443ef744fb3a6a509c6453aea5f/prosecutors-sentencing-recommendation-due-hastert-case

Republicans spent over 100 million taxpayer dollars on an eight-year long witch hunt of Bill Clinton. Investigating every possible thing they could invent or imagine that he had done. This resulted in the Lewinsky Scandal.

Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who led this witch hunt, ended up resigning in disgrace after it was discovered that he had been having his own affair with one of his interns - while he'd been attempting to destroy Clinton - and while his wife lay sick with cancer in the hospital. Gingrich was replaced as Speaker by Republican Bob Livingston, until it was discovered that he had been having multiple sexual extramarital affairs himself...and he too was forced to resign in disgrace.

But then...Republicans needed to find the most honest, most squeaky-clean Republican in the entire history of the "Family Values" Republican Party, so as to avoid any further scandal and embarrassment. After a lengthy search, that shining paragon of Republican virtue was none other than...Dennis Hastert.


EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 11, 2016 - 06:28am PT
100 million taxpayer dollars?

Newt resigned over Callista scandal?

TMZ is not real news.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 11, 2016 - 06:34am PT
Paul Ryan has begun what I think is essentially a campaign for backup nominee. Just like his speakership, he won't agree or even say he's interested until all other options have been exhausted and then he will step in as the savior of the Republican Party. He even has an Obamaesque new video:

[Click to View YouTube Video]



Edward posted
100 million taxpayer dollars?

The Starr investigation alone was nearly $40 million with all the investigations totaling about $80 million in 1990's dollars. What I quoted was a comment that nicely summed up the hypocrisy of Republican grandstanding.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Apr 11, 2016 - 07:14am PT
Two very spot-on, remindful posts, hddj.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 11, 2016 - 08:21am PT
$100 Million? What, did they buy a bunch of the Pentagon's $7600 toilet seats?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 11, 2016 - 09:44am PT
I'm pretty sure they bought the premise for undermining Hillary's legitimacy as President. Pretty good deal considering the rest of us got to pay for it.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 10:01am PT
The biggest threat to America now is these Religious Freedom laws being imposed in Red States.

They allow for lawful bigotry, hate, and restricted freedoms of the people they are aimed at demonizing. Who cares if a transgender uses a women's bathroom? Idiots do..

Will they molest you?
No, but they get killed by bigots all the time in men's restrooms.

But these laws go way past bathrooms, you can hang a sign saying no gays (why not hang a sign saying no blacks)

They are really just back lash against gay marriage being legalized.
In these Red states you can say No marrying gays if it's your job to sign marriage licenses, all you have to say is it's against my religion "screw my job", I don't want them gays marrying in my state.

All because of stupid people voting for nut case far right winger State legislature and Governors.

How many people of the State want these backwards laws?
Small minorities, yet the Christians are shoving them down the throats of their entire state.

It's just take take take the freedoms away, until nothing's left that's good for the people.
But they voted for it, so they must be stupid, there is no other explanation.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 11, 2016 - 10:10am PT
The biggest threat is these Religious Freedom laws being imposed in Red States.

Seriously? I guess I'm too much of an old skool lib thinking it is still the unfettered spending
and war-mongering by the Pentagon. $1.5 TRILLION is the newly revised price tag for
the F-35 Boondoggle. That would almost pay for half of Bernie's $3 Trillion in largesse.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 11, 2016 - 11:17am PT
More trouble in Republican la-la land?

34% of Trump's supporters say they would not vote for another republican candidate:

Those are probably the Democrats who support Trump. Remember, the more Democrats in a particular precinct, the better Trump does. I suspect that at least that percentage of Republicans would not support Trump if he were the nominee. More importantly, it doesn't matter how many of any particular subgourp support a nominee, it matters what majority of what states support the nominee. The polls that purport to show the truly relevant numbers all show Trump has no chance, but Kasich does.

Also, am I the only one who finds it significant that perhaps our most unrepentant partisan Democrat onthis forum finds religious freedom the greatest threat to the contemporary United States?

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 11:22am PT
Those are probably the Democrats who support Trump.

This is the biggest BS I've heard this election cycle

What Democrats???

You are completely delusional

every Trump voter is a right winger, Fact

Why must you deny reality about the Republican Party, they love Trump, they will vote for him, and THEY will riot at the Convention.

They are only Republican Voters, not liberals, not Democrats, not liberal independents, not women, not minorities, not LBGT.

70% of the total population despise Trump
That means only 30% don't despise him, how can that number contain any Democrats or Liberals????

show the truly relevant numbers all show Trump has no chance, but Kasich does
More delusion, how are Kasich's numbers going to give him a chance?
but not Trump's numbers?


am I the only one who finds it significant that perhaps our most unrepentant partisan Democrat on this forum finds religious freedom the greatest threat to the contemporary United States?
JE
Yes why is that?

I guess you don't mind them passing Sharia Law if it's your law.
It's only religious freedom if you are a racist, bigoted hating Christian.

What other Religions get freedom from the Christian Repression and hate laws used against them?
None
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 11, 2016 - 12:01pm PT
John posted
Those are probably the Democrats who support Trump.

You keep intentionally omitting that most of the Democrats who support Trump otherwise vote like Republicans.

John posted
am I the only one who finds it significant that perhaps our most unrepentant partisan Democrat on this forum finds religious freedom the greatest threat to the contemporary United States?

What is significant is that a relatively moderate Republican has been convinced that "religious freedom" means "permission to discriminate and ostracize."


Craig posted
The biggest threat to America now is these Religious Freedom laws being imposed in Red States.

This is a fairly absurd statement. I'm pretty sure that social laws so cartoonishly bad that they are opposed even by national sports leagues and fortune 500 companies are not a grave threat to our country. They reflect odious and regressive views, but they are loudly opposed by huge portions of our country. There are plenty of laws/policies that go largely unopposed that are depriving people of life, liberty and property beyond wedding cakes.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:02pm PT
What is significant is that a relatively moderate Republican has been convinced that "religious freedom" means "permission to discriminate and ostracize."

Not surprisingly, we see these laws differently. I have no problem with public accommodation sorts of laws in general, but when one is renting their own residence, to me at least, the right to privacy that undergirds, e.g. Roe v. Wade, takes precedence over public accommodations. Similarly, when a business includes exercise of artistic discretion, e.g. decorating a wedding cake with a particular message, freedom of speech (include freedom not to be compelled to write messages against one's conscience) takes precedence over public accommodations.

That's the nature of those protections. Again, if the actions being protected were inoffensive, they would need no protection. Because we take offense when people exercise rights, recognized as fundamental, in ways we dislike, and particularly regarding the first enumerated right in the First Amendment, laws protecting those rights rest on solid constitutional and legal grounds.

John
Ghost

climber
A long way from where I started
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:20pm PT
Similarly, when a business includes exercise of artistic discretion, e.g. decorating a wedding cake with a particular message, freedom of speech (include freedom not to be compelled to write messages against one's conscience) takes precedence over public accommodations.

Not sure I understand what you're saying, but I think it is that you believe the wedding cake bakers should have the right to refuse to serve gays.

If that's so, do you also think they should have the right to refuse to serve blacks? Or mixed-race couples? Or Armenian-Americans?
Norton

Social climber
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:32pm PT
It doesn't matter how many people are offended by being discriminated against.

What matters is that the lofty principle of religious freedom is upheld.

It's easy when you really think about it.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:38pm PT
You were right about my claim
It should have been:
One more Right Wing threat to America, Right Wing Religious Freedom laws being imposed in Red States.

We can put it on the list with:
The Right Wing Congress destroying our Economy
The Right Wing agenda to make this Country a Theocracy
The Right Wing agenda to repress minorities and LBGT rights
The Right Wing agenda to Restrict Voting rights
The Right Wing agenda to make abortion illegal
The Right Wing agenda to punish women who have pre-marital sex (included in the Mississippi RF law)
The Right Wing agenda to restrict the availability of birth control
Right Wing militias
Right Wing loons with Guns
Right Wing Neo-Nazis
ight Wingers being manipulated by the NRA with lies and BS so they live in fear and stock pile guns

The Right Wing Religious Terrorists, which include Christians and Muslims

The Right Wing ability to use lies to sway the low information voters

What else is a threat John?


I'm sorry that some of you aren't up on the current political news, but this is BIG!
it's pretty lame to attack me on this before you even know what this is all about

and this will be a big story as they try to impose these things in other states, and the reaction to it by normal people by boycotting these states and the Right Wingers surrender with big "Fail" signs on their foreheads after losing big money (who are the real losers? the people of the state).

All kinds of Companies and celebrities are pulling out.



Bruce Springsteen cancels North Carolina concert over 'bathroom law'

http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/08/media/bruce-springsteen-north-carolina-show-canceled/index.html

The legendary musician announced Friday that his upcoming show in Greensboro, North Carolina, has been canceled in "solidarity" with those protesting the measure.

The newly enacted law requires individuals to use bathrooms that correspond to the gender on their birth certificate, and has drawn fierce criticism for excluding legal protections from gay and transgender people.
"To my mind, it's an attempt by people who cannot stand the progress our country has made in recognizing the human rights of all of our citizens to overturn that progress," Springsteen said in a statement.

"Taking all of this into account, I feel that this is a time for me and the band to show solidarity for those freedom fighters. As a result, and with deepest apologies to our dedicated fans in Greensboro, we have canceled our show scheduled for Sunday, April 10th," Springsteen said.
"Some things are more important than a rock show," he added, "and this fight against prejudice and bigotry — which is happening as I write — is one of them."
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:51pm PT
The biggest threat to America now is these Religious Freedom laws being imposed in Red States.

Wait, I thought the Militias were the biggest threat to America? So the religious freedom laws are the boogeyman now? Good grief.

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 01:53pm PT
I changed it, can't you read.

It would be the biggest threat if you were a transgender person that lived in one of these states.

and added the right wing militia threat, which is BIG

Every threat is from Right Wing extremists
and they all vote Republican

and they live in a delusional bubble,
and then blame everything except themselves when another right winger just like them causes trouble
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 11, 2016 - 02:29pm PT
Should we just consider the Craig Fry - Biggest Threat post to be an open-ended kind of deal then?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 11, 2016 - 02:46pm PT
Not sure I understand what you're saying, but I think it is that you believe the wedding cake bakers should have the right to refuse to serve gays.

If that's so, do you also think they should have the right to refuse to serve blacks? Or mixed-race couples? Or Armenian-Americans?

No. I'm saying they shouldn't be compelled to write a message supporting gay marriage, any more than someone who doesn't like Armenians should be compelled to decorate a cake for me saying that "Armenian Americans Are The Best." If I just want to get a pre-baked and pre-decorated cake to use at a gay wedding, I'd argue for a different result. Then the compelled service does not include the compelled endorsement. It's the compelled endorsement of a message against conscience to which I object.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 03:06pm PT
Yes
It will be an on-going thing

Right Wingers threaten America through "insert some stupid right wing policy or right wing terrorism here"

Those poor Christians with their deeply held beliefs are the victims here, having to live in the same state as people that they find disgusting an immoral. And having to share bathrooms with icky molesters preying on children, just like Denny Hastert and the Catholic Priests.

oh wait a second, transgender people aren't pedophiles??
But most pedophiles are sexually repressed Hetero right wingers!!,,,, Stop the presses!!

What a crock of sh#t you guys try and sell the dupes.

Grow up, the Constitution does not protect your silly bigotry nor from having icky feelings.

These laws will be overturned by the SCOTUS
The Romney decision.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_Massachusetts

but of course, the Christians will once again look for a new way to screw minorities

Norton

Social climber
Apr 11, 2016 - 03:09pm PT
It's the compelled endorsement of a message against conscience to which I object.

John, I have not read the law itself, does it really say that in the law, that business owners are now required to not only bake the cake but put any message on it, or to sell a poster or clothing and be required to put language on it that is personally offensive to the business owner, the law says that?

IF so, then I am not sure, but I tend to agree with your position on this
John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 11, 2016 - 03:15pm PT
It's BS Norton

Just like you can't make a Jewish baker write hail Hitler on a cake
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 11, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
Yes
It will be an on-going thing

They're so silly.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Apr 11, 2016 - 05:54pm PT
This is the biggest BS I've heard this election cycle

What Democrats???

You are completely delusional

every Trump voter is a right winger, Fact

If I was a Democrat in an open primary state, I think I would vote Trump. Dems might pick up huge gains with Trump. What's not like?
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Apr 11, 2016 - 06:10pm PT
"Dems might pick up huge gains with Trump. What's not like?"

Troll or incredibly stooopid?

You decide.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 11, 2016 - 08:29pm PT
I'd really prefer to have a conversation with you Apogee but all you do is spew obsessive compulsive responses. Lol
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Apr 11, 2016 - 08:57pm PT
Lol esco!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 06:25am PT
John posted
Not surprisingly, we see these laws differently. I have no problem with public accommodation sorts of laws in general, but when one is renting their own residence, to me at least, the right to privacy that undergirds, e.g. Roe v. Wade, takes precedence over public accommodations. Similarly, when a business includes exercise of artistic discretion, e.g. decorating a wedding cake with a particular message, freedom of speech (include freedom not to be compelled to write messages against one's conscience) takes precedence over public accommodations.

In other words, you believe in the religious freedom to not serve black people at lunch counters because that's literally what we're talking about, not the freedom to not write something on a birthday cake. It's about WHO is being served. One gives up certain freedoms of expression when they go into business which has been well established by the Supreme Court.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 12, 2016 - 06:45am PT
If they wanna make money running a business in our public marketplaces then they are going to have to follow our rules.

Yep, and I would absolutely love to see the idea of non-public "club" businesses take off in spades. Like most things that get regulated by .gov, the simple concept of non-discrimination has now been inflated to fill every nook and cranny of an business owners life.

You can't serve trans fat, no smoking, your drinks can't be X big, and the list goes on. This has gone so far past simple things such as non-discrimination and having a fire exit that business owners must be better at jumping through regulatory hoops than they are at their actual business. Which explains a lot about the reduction in innovation and service our country suffers from.

IF a business is a "club", then they have the ability and reserve the right to refuse service (or offer service) to specific clientele. Its about the only way a business owner can avoid some the silly restrictions and regulations and I would enjoy watching some businesses push the boundaries of that concept in an effort to get the pendulum swinging the other way for a change.

Just like I enjoyed watching Uber vex the fee and license boards and otherwise befuddle the local Penergast Machines across the country.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 06:59am PT
Escopeta posted
You can't serve trans fat, no smoking, your drinks can't be X big, and the list goes on. This has gone so far past simple things such as non-discrimination and having a fire exit that business owners must be better at jumping through regulatory hoops than they are at their actual business. Which explains a lot about the reduction in innovation and service our country suffers from.

I'm pretty sure the inability to serve trans fats or force servers to work in carcinogen filled environments isn't stifling innovation. You're massively conflating the issues when you pivot to talking about Uber, which is just as much about disrupting workers rights as it is about disrupting protectionist licensing regimes. To bring it back to the issue at hand, an Uber driver shouldn't be able to refuse service to a gay couple any more than they should to a black person.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 09:18am PT
EdwardT posted
Thanks BC. Obamacare has some serious problems no one cares to address. The biggest being losses incurred by insurance companies. They're drooping coverage in some States. Co-ops are failing.

Another is premium increases. Obama promised good coverage at affordable rates. Maybe that's the case for some, but my coverage has declined and my premiums rates are increasing at faster rate than I ever experienced before Obamacare. For 2016, seventeen States saw rate increases above 20 percent.

The ACA was a step in the right direction. But it's seriously flawed. The numbers don't work. Maybe Hillary take it on as President. Maybe she's got enough dirt on Republicans to get a better program passed.

You refer to an interesting paradox: overall healthcare spending has decreased (technically, the rate of growth has decreased) while individual premiums have increased. This is largely due to employers shifting the costs onto their employees, not because insurers are raising their rates. Some insurers are raising rates but it is not clear that they are doing so with good reason. They are arguing that the new people being covered are sicker and require more care, but there is not good data on this.

Beyond that, the simple fact is that reducing overall healthcare spending might require that we increase individual spending so long as we insist on having a consumer driven market. Obama has been very aggressive in managing what care Medicare will reimburse which has had a huge impact on how care is delivered, but it's not going to be a quick fix unless we radically alter how healthcare in America works.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 09:43am PT
HDDJ - Your claims and link rely on data preceding the start of Obamacare.

In 2014, U.S. health care spending increased 5.3 percent following growth of 2.9 percent in 2013 to reach $3.0 trillion, or $9,523 per person. The faster growth experienced in 2014 was primarily due to the major coverage expansions under the Affordable Care Act, particularly for Medicaid and private health insurance. The share of the economy devoted to health care spending was 17.5 percent, up from 17.3 percent in 2013.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 09:56am PT
Edward, I'm not sure you fully read the article or my post.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:10am PT
Edward,

what would you personally recommend as your replacement for the ACA that covers the tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans?

Would you favor single payer healthcare for all?

Or would you prefer repealing the ACA in its entirety and going back to the way things were in the past?
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:17am PT
Better yet, what legislation can make it through the next congress and who has the political skills to push it through?

We can debate all day about what we want, but, really, it's of little use. It all comes down to votes by elected officials, correct?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 10:20am PT
The House has returned to regular order in many ways under Ryan. I actually do think ACA reform is possible with Clinton and Ryan working together. Sanders could do it too but not if he actually proposes single payer.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:28am PT
Edward, I'm not sure you fully read the article or my post.

Really?

You counter my post about premium increases under Obamacare with data unrelated to Obamacare. I post information showing healthcare spending, during the first year of Obamacare, increased at a rate nearly twice the rate of the last year your article addresses.

Overall healthcare spending is increasing at an increasing rate.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:39am PT
Edward,

what would you personally recommend as your replacement for the ACA that covers the tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans?

Would you favor single payer healthcare for all?

Or would you prefer repealing the ACA in its entirety and going back to the way things were in the past?

We're too far downriver to return to a pre-ACA marketplace. Besides, it was broke.

IMO the best system would be single payer, with subsidies (like the current ones) and adjusted premiums, based on health. This last part would have a reasonable range, allowing someone with cancer or AIDS to have coverage, while requiring them to pay a premium for their poor health. Also, everyone all in. No more paying a fee to opt out.

The downside: One ginormous bureaucracy coverage. Scares the hell out of me.

One caveat - Allow individuals to buy additional private insurance.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:42am PT
We can debate all day about what we want, but, really, it's of little use.

Life on the interweb.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 12, 2016 - 10:49am PT
Overall healthcare spending is increasing at an increasing rate.

Edward makes a good point ^^

It IS unfortunate that healthcare spending has been increasing really since reliable early records were kept, and it has been increasing even more for decades and decades now.

My own monthly premiums were going up on average 40% a year before the ACA

Because the ACA allowed other insurers to come into my state they now have to compete for business and as a result my premiums have still gone up but by 18% instead of 40%

It would be quite naive to expect healthcare costs to stop going up or go down, but to allow the past to continue on was simply pricing way too many Americans out of having insurance - a good thing I suppose if one really though that was good idea.

i remember when the Republicans had the Presidency, House, and Senate in 2003 and passed the massive Medicare Prescription Drug program. It immediately had a lot of problems and confusions but Democrats joined with Republicans instead of calling for its repeal and together both parties passed further legislation that worked out the problems and now tens of millions of senior Americans enjoy having their drugs included with their Medicare programs, a huge win.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 10:51am PT
Edward, national healthcare spending is growing at a slower rate than in previous years.

http://www.healthsystemtracker.org/insight/a-new-way-of-measuring-health-costs-sheds-light-on-recent-health-spending-trends/
http://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/what-is-behind-the-recent-slowdown-in-health-spending/
http://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/the-latest-health-spending-projections/

Some argue this was in part due to the recession, others the ACA, but the growth has slowed.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 11:02am PT
Healthcare spending rose 5.3% in 2014. Estimates peg 2015 around 4.5%.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 12, 2016 - 11:09am PT
So what would you like to compare it with, exactly?

*edit*

Healthcare spending rose 5.3% in 2014. Estimates peg 2015 around 4.5%.

So you're saying that increases in healthcare spending decreased. I'm glad we can finally agree on this.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 12, 2016 - 03:16pm PT
Semantics with HDDJ.

Oh joy.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 12, 2016 - 08:07pm PT
How Fox News Unwittingly Destroyed the Republican Party

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cody-cain/how-fox-news-destroyed-republican-party_b_9644594.html


The Republican Party is in a pickle.

The Party itself despises its own two leading presidential candidates, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. This is a remarkable oddity just in itself. But there is good reason for it. Both of these candidates are so extreme and disastrous that they will almost certainly never be able to win a national election for the Republican Party.

But much worse, if and when one of these candidates does becomes the Republican Party’s nominee for president, the Party could very well be torn asunder into factions. One wing would split off to support the extremist candidate, and the other more moderate wing would be so embarrassed by what the Republican Party had become that they might even abandon the Party altogether. And forget about attracting new members into the Party because it would be too mean and extreme.

The Republicans, however, have no one to blame but themselves. This is a crisis of their own creation. And it didn’t just happen overnight.

The Republican Party has been fomenting anger and discontent in the base of its own Party for years. The mechanism through which this hate has been disseminated has been the network of extremist media of right-wing talk radio and the Fox News Channel, which is essentially talk radio transposed onto television.

Just think of all the right-wing “superstars” who spew messages of anger and hate every single day throughout the land over this enormous megaphone. Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Ben Shapiro, Dana Loesch, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, to name a few.

And make no mistake, spewing hate has a significant impact upon society. It is the equivalent of modern-day propaganda where the population is barraged with a stream of consistent messaging. As ordinary people go about their daily lives, they are exposed repeatedly, day-in and day-out, to the same messages in numerous different forms and by numerous different people. Pretty soon, these messages begin to sink in and take effect. The audience begins to adopt a worldview consistent with these messages, regardless of the degree of truth. It is a remarkable phenomenon.

History is replete with examples of how propaganda can be very effective in altering the views of a population. Nazi Germany in the 1930’s is a classic example. How could it possibly be that a maniac like Adolph Hitler was able to convince millions of ordinary people throughout the entire nation of Germany to go to war against the world? Well, propaganda was an extremely powerful component.

For years, Hitler inundated the German population with a stream of consistent messages that the German Aryans were the superior master race of all humans, and that Germany was under imminent threat of destruction by foreign enemies as evidenced by the Treaty of Versailles, which was the international peace treaty that ended World War I but that also imposed upon Germany the hardship of having to make enormous reparation payments to the foreign victors for having caused the war. The Nazi messaging also preached about internal threats from various segments of Germany’s own population, like Jews, homosexuals, and communists. The German population began to adopt this perverse and paranoid worldview as truth, and a national war machine was born.

Propaganda is powerful stuff. Many people are susceptible to it and can be swayed by it, especially the less educated.

In America today, the right-wing media network is engaged in this very same activity through Fox News and extremist talk radio. This network is constantly barraging its audience, day-in and day-out, over and over again, with a stream of consistent messaging. And this messaging is overwhelmingly negative and destructive.

The messaging consists of common themes that recur over and over in various forms. One central theme is a fierce opposition against government, especially so called “big government.” This reappears in various sub-forms as well, such as rage against bureaucracy, regulations, Washington, D.C., the IRS, the Environmental Protection Agency, and federal politicians.

It is really quite remarkable that a major political party could get away with so shamelessly trashing our very own government and our very own nation. But yet, there it is.

They rant and rave about how our nation is a disaster, out of control, a huge mess. The government is so far off the rails that it no longer even follows the Constitution of the United States! Absurd, of course. But wildly popular.

Another big theme is fear and victimization. You had better watch out because government is gonna getcha! “They,” whoever that may be, are about to take away your rights. Your freedom is about to disappear. Your religious liberties will be stripped away. You won’t be able to make your own healthcare decisions. Free choice will be gone. Your children will suffer. You are under a big threat. Even though you are just an innocent person minding your own business, you are about to be victimized!

Another common theme is the fear of foreigners, or outsiders. We must protect our own in-group from the vague and mysterious threats posed by those who are a little bit different from us. The particular targeted group changes with the times, but it has included Muslims, illegal immigrants, Syrian refugees, Russia, China, Mexican immigrants and communists. But the concept remains the same.

And, of course, someone from the Democratic Party, or some “liberal,” is to blame for all of this wreckage. Demonizing a specific target is powerful. If a Democrat is in the White House, then the President becomes the favorite bullseye. Otherwise the demon is some other Democratic politician, typically from Congress.

But why would a Democrat want to take away people’s rights throughout the nation? This would mean that the Democrat would also be taking away their own rights, and also the rights of their constituents. Why in the world would they do that? Well, of course, this makes no sense whatsoever. But it doesn’t need to make any sense. It just needs to instill fear, anger, and discontent.

Now, a political platform comprised of nothing more than hate and anger is not a very viable or sustainable political strategy, especially for a national party like the Republican Party. It may be a good strategy for a specific election or an isolated situation, but an entire political party cannot endure based upon only a message of outrage and opposition.

So why would the Republican Party devise such a strategy that has no hope of success? Well, it turns out that they did not devise this strategy. In fact, it’s not even a strategy at all. It emerged not as a result of a grand Republican master plan, but rather, it emerged as a result of market economics.

The extremist right-wing network of Fox News and talk radio was not created by politicians, and it is not funded by a political party. It is not supported by donations from people seeking political expression. No. It was created for one central purpose: to make money.

The founding motivation and the driving force behind all of this propaganda of hate and anger that is being disseminated throughout our society is nothing more than the almighty dollar. The profit motive. It is a business. Pure and simple.

And, as it turns out, the business of peddling hate and anger is a fantastically profitable one at that.

Rush Limbaugh raked-in $80 million for himself in 2015 alone. Sean Hannity was paid $30 million. Glenn Beck is personally worth over $100 million. Bill O’Reilly’s television show, “The O’Reilly Factor,” generates over $100 million per year in advertising revenue.

If these front-men are making this much money, well then you know that their corporate masters are making even more.

Fox News has dominated the ratings as the number one cable news channel for the last 14 years and reportedly earns over $1 billion in profits annually, making it a golden goose in the overall Fox corporate empire. Fox itself is one of the most valuable brands in the world with sales of over $13 billion. And the tycoon behind Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, is personally worth $12 billion.

This is Big Business.

It is no joke. We are not talking about some folks just yearning to express their opinions. No. This operation is not being driven by politics or by a desire to promulgate political viewpoints. No. This operation is being driven by money. Big Money. This is what it’s all about.

Of course, politics is involved as well. No doubt. The content spewed by this media network is highly political in nature and it champions right-wing issues, right-wing politicians, and the right-wing Republican Party. This is no accident. In fact, it makes perfect sense when viewed through an economic perspective.

Corporate profits are greatly impacted by governmental policies. Corporations, therefore, desire the government to be controlled by whichever political party is the most favorable to corporate profits. And this, of course, is the Republican Party. So it makes perfect sense that this extremist media network would use its megaphone to attempt to influence politics by urging support for the right-wing Republican Party.

Interestingly, the Fox media empire that is dominated by the tycoon Rupert Murdoch is shockingly reminiscent of the media empire from around 1900 that was dominated by the tycoon William Randolph Hearst.

Mr. Hearst was notorious for printing false information in his media network of newspapers in order to influence public opinion and politics. Instead of using his vast media network to objectively and fairly report news and disseminate information, Mr. Hearst used his media network as an instrument of power by controlling the content and distorting the truth in order to manipulate public opinion for his own benefit.

more..
And there it was. The Republican Party had made a deal with the devil.

keep reading, too long to post all
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Apr 13, 2016 - 05:38am PT
The downside: One ginormous bureaucracy coverage

No bureaucracy in those insurance corporations at all!

Having been involved in corporate and government bureaucracies, my opinion is that while the government version is benign, the corporate version is actively malign.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 13, 2016 - 06:27am PT
Ed posted
Semantics with HDDJ.

Oh joy.

It helps if you stop trying to claim we disagree on something that we both agree the facts clearly support.



Craig- I think Democrats are ignoring just how poorly their party is doing in 2 respects. First, the fact that they are losing repeatedly basically everywhere that isn't the White House. Second, there is a similar rift in the Democratic party as we are seeing in the Republican one. It's not as extreme, but the ignorance on the far left that Sanders has uncovered has been truly breathtaking when you take it all in. While the schadenfreude is impossible to avoid, Democrats would be better served in addressing the problems that they are encountering. If the Republican party "breaks" this year, they will only be "broken" so much as they have lost the White House and maybe the Senate. They will still overwhelmingly control most of the states, the House and they will probably be able to retool and build using the midterms as an easy place to win in the interim because Democrats just refuse to actually show up.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Apr 13, 2016 - 08:07am PT
How Fox News Unwittingly Destroyed the Republican Party

Don't get your hopes up.

There has been a recipe to subjugate the majority by the minority that is as old as society it's self. The accumulation of wealth among the fewest number of partisans has always been the calculation.

Whether it be a benign democracy or a brutal dictatorship and everything in between- these ingredients have remained the same though time. The art, is the constant remixing of the quantities to feed the appetite of just enough to keep a grip on power while poisoning everyone else.

Because murder, torture and imprisonment has become a bit risky, the number one ingredient that industrialist, capitalist and aristocrats are feeding Americans right now, is blame shifting via corporate media. Government, minorities, welfare recipients and Muslims are the obvious diversionary targets.

To be gullible enough to think that government is a conspiratory monolith that is in competition with the greedy ruling class is laughable- no, it's sad actually.

Yes, there are unscrupulous individuals in government that are cheating for personal gain, but more often than not, you'll find a commercial interest fostering that behavior. Although government will always be reactive, mostly inefficient and at times painfully slow, as long as we participate, administrative mechanisms exist to keep things fair and productive for the most part (we are dealing with humans after all).

So now the RNC is on the hit list...it doesn't matter, the recipe will be altered slightly to keep enough idiots believing that a few wealthy people will want to share- mostly because you're white and Christian and you deserve it.


Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 13, 2016 - 08:20am PT
It'll be a temporary set back for the ever present right wing tribal mentality.

I just hope some of the smart ones can escape their denial and come to their sense about what's going on in the Republican/Libertarian/Conservative movement.

It's become a dangerous cult
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 13, 2016 - 08:39am PT
The Sanders side has become no less cultish. They're even turning to Trump for validation: http://www.facebook.com/NowThisElection/videos/1152457384785750/
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 13, 2016 - 08:42am PT
Cults use lies, and misinformation to keep them in a cult like bubble

The Democratic party does not do this, nor does Bernie
or most of his supporters

Cult like as a Party? No

There are cultish members of any group

dirtbag

climber
Apr 13, 2016 - 08:49am PT
Craig- I think Democrats are ignoring just how poorly their party is doing in 2 respects. First, the fact that they are losing repeatedly basically everywhere that isn't the White House. Second, there is a similar rift in the Democratic party as we are seeing in the Republican one. It's not as extreme, but the ignorance on the far left that Sanders has uncovered has been truly breathtaking when you take it all in. While the schadenfreude is impossible to enjoy, Democrats would be better served in addressing the problems that they are encountering. If the Republican party "breaks" this year, they will only be "broken" so much as they have lost the White House and maybe the Senate. They will still overwhelmingly control most of the states, the House and they will probably be able to retool and build using the midterms as an easy place to win in the interim because Democrats just refuse to actually show up.

I agree.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 13, 2016 - 08:56am PT
Err...schadenfreude is impossible to avoid, not enjoy.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 13, 2016 - 08:57am PT
The center/lefties, the Democrats of Europe, are in widespread retreat there, also. The only
thing that they've got going for them there is the immutable EU bueaucracy which they
created and which has become the anchor around their neck, too. People are sick and tired
of the onerous regulations and they've finally realized those regs are a huge drag on the
economy.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 13, 2016 - 09:03am PT
The center/lefties are in retreat because they are getting beat back by the right wing and big money

As long as money can buy politicians, we are screwed
Bushman

climber
The state of quantum flux
Apr 13, 2016 - 10:13am PT
A World Outside Disney

Here's the church and here's the steeple
Open there doors and there's all the sheeple
Following others into the abyss
The way we all act you know something's amiss

Religion and politics stirred like a brew
Mix in a toxic philosophy too
Addicting the mind like a dangerous drug
From genius to moron we all get the bug

To drool in our Starbucks and stare at our tubes
Listening like zombies to media boobs
Gathering in clusters spellbound by the thrall
No clue of the circumstance behind it all

History be damned we repeat all in rote
Righteously forging ahead to misquote
Patriot mantras and morals of old
No matter how dated or covered with mold

When slavery and racism ran in our genes
Sexism and rape an acceptable means
For predicting the outcome of children to come
Where abuses and torture would make our minds numb

To follow a leader whomever they be
Who lines the path primrose we all should be free
To denigrate our neighbor and trot out a lamb
Oh sacrifice we must let our conscience be damned

Onward you soldiers and follow if you must
Don't take time to reason what's logically just
With patience and kindness no longer in vogue
We're all ruthless sheeple who do what we're told

There's a world outside Disney progressive and wise
Respecting the sovereignty of each of our lives
Just talk to a human who's not from these lands
And you just might remember what we have in our hands

The blood of our brothers won't buy us a plot
But pays for our stewardship likely as not
And the right to move forward instead of go back
Where men's lives were only worth gold in a sack

So here's the church and here's the steeple
Open the doors and see all the people
In a church that's a nation the steeple a light
Where power reserved is more mighty than might

But ruthless sheeple would still come and would go
Who's handed the reins something nobody knows
Throwing lives under buses a political fact
But threading a needle requires more tact

That's how things always are and they always will be
In a world complicated changing constantly
Less concerned by who governs we take or we give
In a world outside Disney where the rest of us live

-bushman
04/13/2016

dirtbag

climber
Apr 13, 2016 - 12:23pm PT
Ted Cruz once argued that the state of Texas should be allowed to ban the sale of dildos, artificial vaginas, and vibrators:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/04/13/ted_cruz_once_argued_that_selling_dildos_should_be_illegal.html

And no, I am not making this up.
Hardly Visible

Social climber
Llatikcuf WA
Apr 13, 2016 - 12:27pm PT
Nice poem Bushman.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Apr 13, 2016 - 01:14pm PT
Ted Cruz once argued that the state of Texas should be allowed to ban the sale of dildos, artificial vaginas, and vibrators

I'm glad he wasn't in Oregon. What would we have sent the Ranch Stupidians?
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 13, 2016 - 01:19pm PT
The center/lefties are in retreat because they are getting beat back by the right wing and big money

That's not why they're having their asses handed to them in Europe.
They've failed, plain and simple.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 13, 2016 - 01:28pm PT
Europe has a different demographic from the U.S. because of declining populations of citizens of working age. The European welfare state relies on keeping a ratio of workers/beneficiaries at least constant, if not increasing. It suffers the same issue Social Security and Medicare suffer here -- as does every Ponzi scheme.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 13, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
Neo-con economics are what failed, it's failed every time, please state a historical account when it wasn't a failure
liberal economics has not failed, most countries have no problem using it.

Liberal economics just won't be used to fix the problems the neo-cons caused because the conservatives are still in charge, like here.

SS and MC would be fine if Neo-cons wouldn't try to make it fail by underfunding it.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 13, 2016 - 02:48pm PT
John posted:

It suffers the same issue Social Security and Medicare suffer here -- as does every Ponzi scheme.

John, you seriously believe SS and Medicare are "Ponzi schemes"?

you do realize that SS operates as a surplus with 2.7 trillion dollars in trust?

and has lifted tens and tens of millions out of extreme poverty since the 1930's?

yes John without "fixing" legislation such as raising the income to deduct cap, SS
will eventually run out of funds to pay 100% of benefits, in roughly another 18 years,
and surely you would agree that a future congress will have the will and intelligence to raise the cap and perhaps add "means testing" to deny benefit to Warren Buffet, etc?

or: does the very idea of say people paying into SS and then dying before age 62,
or some other way people can get screwed, the real reason you denigrate the single great social benefit program in American history by now calling it a Ponzi scheme"?
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Apr 13, 2016 - 05:23pm PT
Yeah John, that's a classic poor analogy.

Consider if Bush and the Wall Street gang would have had their way in the privatization of Social Security.

Imagine the irreversible carnage if retirees would have transferred taxpayer guaranteed, retirement money to the stock market prior to the Great Recession.

That probably would have resulted in bread lines for many of us.

Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Apr 13, 2016 - 07:26pm PT
Just watched the town hall with Cruz's family. The claim was made that Heidi's father, Peter Nelson, climbed Mt. Everest. A quick google revealed that he had was on a 1991 expedition, however he did not summit.

http://publications.americanalpineclub.org/articles/12199122602/Asia-Nepal-Everest

On October 2, Nelson joined Lowe and Culver at Camp IV. That night Nelson developed pulmonary edema and descended to Camp II where his condition was stablized with the use of a pressure bag.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Apr 13, 2016 - 07:31pm PT
surely you would agree that a future congress will have the will and intelligence to raise the cap and perhaps add "means testing" to deny benefit to Warren Buffet, etc?

I hope not. SS is for everybody, Bill Gates included.
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Apr 13, 2016 - 07:43pm PT
Social Security , the Ponzi scheme , would go away if Americans could latch on to the billable hours scam...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 14, 2016 - 06:45am PT
John posted
Europe has a different demographic from the U.S. because of declining populations of citizens of working age. The European welfare state relies on keeping a ratio of workers/beneficiaries at least constant, if not increasing. It suffers the same issue Social Security and Medicare suffer here -- as does every Ponzi scheme.

Europe has a different demographic problem than the US because it has the same demographic problem as the US?

Norton posted
John, you seriously believe SS and Medicare are "Ponzi schemes"?

No, he doesn't. But he can't help getting a rise out of people now and then.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Apr 14, 2016 - 02:54pm PT
I think Democrats are ignoring just how poorly their party is doing in 2 respects. First, the fact that they are losing repeatedly basically everywhere that isn't the White House. Second, there is a similar rift in the Democratic party as we are seeing in the Republican one.

Much of the Democrats poor showing is due to gerrymandering. I'm too lazy to look up the exact results, but in one or more of the last mid-terms, Democrats got more total votes in both the House and Senate but the Republicans ended up in control of both houses. Wyoming having the same number of senators as California is the reason in the Senate. The House is largely due to gerrymandering, although I have read that some of it is due to highly democratic urban areas that tend to end up naturally gerrymandered. (I would think R's would get the same in rural areas, but it may not all cancel out.)

I prefer Democrats over the disaster that the Republican party has become. However, I agree that the Dems are not immune to populist anger. I expect Hillary to win the Whitehouse this election and, if the R's can nominate somebody like a Ryan/Kasich/Romney the Rs will win in 2020 and the Dems could then well have a party in chaos.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 14, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
Continued story

How Fox News Unwittingly Destroyed the Republican Party

Hearst used his media network as an instrument of power by controlling the content and distorting the truth in order to manipulate public opinion for his own benefit.

So we have seen this playbook before. One would think that we would now be savvy enough to prevent this terrible abuse from happening again. But apparently not. It is astonishing that Mr. Murdoch has been able to recreate right before our very eyes the abusive practices pioneered by Mr. Hearst over one hundred years ago.

Today, the bottom line is money. Politics is secondary. While the media content is highly political, the purpose behind influencing politics is to serve the primary objective of protecting the big profits.

Just think what would happen if the Republican Party suddenly proposed a tax on excessive corporate media profits. This right-wing network would shift away from the Republican Party so fast your head would spin. Bill O’Reilly would be sporting tie-dyes and Birkenstocks.

Corporate profits is what led to the creation and expansion of this extremist right-wing media network. And it is indeed a cozy little business model. The network builds an audience by appealing to people’s fear, insecurity, and anger, and simultaneously directs its audience to support the right-wing political party that best protects the network’s own profits.

It’s like a rigged game. The content disseminated over the network masquerades as being objective and informative, but in reality the content has instead been carefully designed to promote the network’s own business interests.

Pretty nifty.

What is best for corporate profits, however, is not necessarily best for a democratic society.

From a political perspective, it is certainly not healthy to incite anger and hate within a nation’s own population. And it is not very wise to inflame hostility and rage against a nation’s own government. From a business perspective, sure, it is perfectly understandable because a corporation can exploit this and profit handsomely from it. But from a political perspective of creating a cohesive society and maintaining peace and harmony among the population, this is disastrous.

Responsible politicians certainly know better and would never endorse any enterprise seeking to inflame anger and hostility in the population. A true political leader would not participate in any such conduct, but instead would speak out against it. A true political leader would not condone the dissemination of false and misleading information, but instead would seek to correct it with accuracy. A true political leader would not sacrifice unity in society in order to capture a few easy votes, but instead would uphold his or her principles and integrity even at the risk of losing votes.

That is genuine political leadership. Doing what is best for society, even in the face of adversity.

But politicians in the Republican Party could not resist. The extremist right-wing network of Fox News and talk radio had built up an audience that could easily be exploited for political support. Even though the extremist media network was fomenting anger and hatred that is disastrous for society overall, the network could also be used to deliver political votes to Republican politicians.

And there it was. The Republican Party had made a deal with the devil.

An unholy alliance was formed. The Republican Party would allow the extremist right-wing network to promulgate its destructive propaganda throughout society in order to generate its enormous profits, and in exchange, the network would direct its audience to vote for the Republican Party.

The allure of easy votes was too great. Exercising true leadership was too difficult.

So for years and years, the extremist right-wing media network spewed out content full of anger, hate, and division. And Republican politicians jumped on the bandwagon. They began preaching the same destructive messages and appearing on the extremist right-wing network all across the nation.

And guess what? It worked.

The base of the Republican Party grew more and more angry. Their resentment against our very own government grew ever greater. Their sense of victimization became ever more acute. Their fury at the establishment boiled over.

And then, predictably, it backfired.

The base of the Republican Party became a Frankenstein. It became radicalized into an extreme movement that turned against the established order, including the leadership of the Republican Party itself. It has become a monster of its own that is now roaming the countryside and terrorizing the very political party that created it.

This is the reason behind the rise of candidates like Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. The Republican Party establishment despises these candidates, but the Party has no idea how to slay these dragons.

These candidates now pose the enormous threat of potentially causing a giant split within the Party that could lead to the utter destruction of the entire Republican Party itself.

It is a remarkable story.
The Republican Party has enjoyed its dance with the devil. Now it must pay the piper.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 14, 2016 - 08:10pm PT
August posted
Much of the Democrats poor showing is due to gerrymandering.

Indeed. Why? Because after breaking records with massive turnout for a transformational president in 2008, Democrats sat home in 2010 and allowed the Tea Party to dominate legislatures in state houses and governors mansions from coast to coast. The Republicans were then handed the responsibility of drawing new congressional lines and enshrined obstructionism for a decade. Democrats proceeded to show up in huge numbers in 2012 and reelected Obama and won back the Senate. In 2014, Democrats repeated their mistake and sat home, losing the Senate. There is a lack of commitment by the Democratic coalition to consistently stand up and be heard. Meanwhile Republicans are enacting a regressive and oppressive agenda in states all over the country while Democrats bicker over whether or not a democratic-socialist can single handedly implement single payer healthcare, end fracking and implement a $15 minimum wage.

There is a lack of seriousness on the part of Democratic voters that I find incredibly frustrating.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 06:02am PT
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 19, 2016 - 06:09am PT
There is a lack of seriousness on the part of Democratic voters that I find incredibly frustrating.

It's okay. The Republic party has enjoyed its dance with the Devil. Now, it must pay the piper.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 19, 2016 - 06:52am PT
Good read, HDDJ...

http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/276743-democracy-in-the-crosshairs

In recent debates, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump boasted about the millions of votes they have received in the presidential primaries, with each touting the 8 million or 9 million votes they have won so far. So, out of a country of about 321 million people, these candidates will take maybe 10 to 12 million votes each by June — votes from less than 4 percent of the country.

Modern communications, higher voter education and the power of the internet are colliding with outdated methods of voting and participation to produce a system badly in need of reform. The result is a democracy that is veering off course, increasingly reflecting the will of powerful activist groups and the political extremes, and not of the broad population of the country.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 07:25am PT
Interesting points, Crank. I fear the quote you posted belies a false sense of history though. It seems to me that a broader portion of the electorate is getting involved in elections and are frustrated that the actual process doesn't match the one we are taught in 7th grade nor the one the media reinforces. Groups of dedicated, motivated people will always have outsized influence..that's the point of organizing. 50-60 years ago the idea of presidential candidates NOT being picked by party insiders would have been strange. I'll give the rest of it a read.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 07:42am PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 08:13am PT
Trump saw Muslims celebrating 9/11 at 7/11's which is why he was confused.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 11:14am PT
Sounds like legit voting issues in NY at the moment. People who have been living in one place and voted 7 months ago all of a sudden not on the list at their precinct. Some people on another forum are on the list in Yonkers where they've never lived. No bueno.
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
Apr 19, 2016 - 11:33am PT
Fingers crossed for HRC. Sure hope the polls are right on this one.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 19, 2016 - 06:16pm PT
Election called immediately for Trump. Still unclear if he'll break 50% and sweep the delegates.

Democratic side will still take a while. The NYT has a good editorial on why Sanders should stay in the race no matter what and I think they make some good points.
dirtbag

climber
Apr 19, 2016 - 09:30pm PT
How about that Ted Cruz fella? Got skunked in the big apple.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 19, 2016 - 09:38pm PT
"a while" turned out to be not very long. She cruised to a 15-point advantage.
Bernie stay in? Sure. But tone it down.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 20, 2016 - 05:27am PT
HERE IS SOMETHING YOU WON'T HEAR FROM THE CORPORATE MEDIA

Clinton won 58% of the New York vote but only got 54% of the delegates!!! Each of those delegates represents 7300 voters. The people's voice has been silenced!!! Source: The New York Times



Fun fact: Each New York Democratic elected delegate represents about 7300 voters. Wyoming's Democratic Caucus was attended by about 7300 and determined the outcome of their 14 elected delegates. 1 caucus goer in Wyoming was roughly 14 times more powerful than 1 voter in New York. (Note that these numbers are based on actual voter turnout)
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 20, 2016 - 07:57am PT

This election is so weird.
dirtbag

climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 08:23am PT
Sanders is turning into a whiner.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 20, 2016 - 08:31am PT
http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/ny/Dem




Also, this site is amazing: http://www.presidentbyamendment.com/
dirtbag

climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 09:04am PT
Dang, he's got my vote.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 11:25am PT
As general election polling becomes more representative of the actual outcome, Vox and Real Clear Politics estimate that at this rate Democrats not only would win the presidency and take back the Senate, they could even take back the House.

One reason the Republicans are having such a hard time catching up to Clinton is because they aren’t united, and are quite fractured. Democrats, while having their own differences, are nowhere near the breaking point the Republicans are, and that is a huge advantage heading into the general election.

Republicans should be terrified. If they were smart, they would broker their convention and nominate Kasich, who consistently beats Hillary Clinton in the polls. But since when has the Republican Party done the smart thing?

Years of fear mongering and peppered racism has not, nor will it, pay off for the GOP. They created this monster, now they have to deal with it.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2016/04/20/trends-show-republicans-are-screwed-for-2016-and-its-all-thanks-to-trump/
dirtbag

climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 11:42am PT
Conventions and parties exist to get people into power, not necessarily to reflect the will of the party electorate. That has always been the case. Usually, these two princilples line up, but as we are now seeing, and as Trump voters might soon find out, this isn't always true.

(Some Sanders voters seem to forget that notwithstanding her superdelegate advantage, Hillary is at this point reflecting the will of both the party and the electorate--she has more votes than Sanders and the support of party elite.)

So, Kasich could be nominated. So could Cruz or Rubio: nothing illegitimate about it. But elevating a second or third or fourth place finisher over someone who has the most votes and delegates would cause trump people to go apesh#t. And without those voters, Kasich or Rubio or Cruz would be in big trouble, even with their crossover appeal.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 11:52am PT
good points, Dirt

and it is probably true to say that Trump is now Well Known to the American people and so his negatives are likely at or close to their maximum

but Cruz is a different story as all the attention has been on Trump, and IF Cruz gets
the Republican nomination then his azz will be vetted and his repulsiveness will become as evident to the electorate as it is to all his congressional colleagues

kind of seems a tie to me, Trump or Cruz, as to which one would be worse for the Republicans as their nominee - either one hands the Presidency to Mrs. Clinton
and very likely the US Senate also, alas the House will stay Republican
dirtbag

climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 11:58am PT
It probably is a tie as to who is worse. Trump is more personally unappealing, but not as hard right as Cruz. Cruz is very far out of the mainstream compared to Hillary.


Amazing. The republicans started with 17 presidential candidates, including some pretty decent ones, and the two front runners are two of the three least electable choices (the other being Carson, who was a frontrunner for a very brief moment.).

That party really f*#ked up badly!
ydpl8s

Trad climber
Santa Monica, California
Apr 20, 2016 - 12:02pm PT
I'm not too excited about any of the candidates. If one of them would pick Elizabeth Warren as their VP (wish she was running), I'd vote for them.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 20, 2016 - 12:24pm PT
I agree with your analysis, Norton. We Republicans find ourselves in a real bind because a strong majority of us do not support a Trump nomination, but we have not agreed on an alternative candidate, so Trump has a plurality of votes cast. Judging by my somewhat limited conversation with Trump supporters, they see little difference between the other Republican candidates and those of the Democrats.

I find it particularly significant that most of the Trumpians with whom I've spoken view "politician" as a pejorative term. They support Trump because he's "his own man," "not a politician," "says what he means," "unbeholden to anyone else," etc. They don't seem to hold any particular governing philosphy in common, which should surprise no one, since Trump has not articulated any.

Their scorn of "politics" and "politicians" also leads them to ignore the essentials of political science, viz. no one governs unless he or she gets elected. Moreover, even elected officials cannot enact legislation without obtaining at least a majority of their fellow legislators to support that legislation. The Trumpians' (and, to some extent, the Berners') seeming disinterest in governing in the real world leads me to think that the Trumpians really want to whine, not to win.

All of this means that unless Trump gets the nomination, a very large number of Trumpians won't vote for the Republican nominee. Unless the Berners do the same with the Democrats (much less likely, in my opinion), Trump's presence has guaranteed Hillary's victory.

John
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 20, 2016 - 02:59pm PT
We Republicans find ourselves in a real bind because a strong majority of us do not support a Trump nomination
JE

I guess Trump's win in the NY primary with 60% of the vote was not majority when it comes to Republican math.

And like you said before, Kasich's 25% portion of the vote demonstrate better numbers than Trump's
?????

I guess it's this Republican math that baffles us?
Hopefully JE will keep us posted on how it works.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 20, 2016 - 03:07pm PT
I guess Trump's win in the NY primary with 60% of the vote was not majority when it comes to Republican math.

Craig, Trump's big win there was totally expected as it was his own home state

and as time has gone on his winning margins are getting progressively slimmer in
addition to actually losing some states outright to both Cruz and nice guy Kasich
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 21, 2016 - 06:49am PT
John posted
I find it particularly significant that most of the Trumpians with whom I've spoken view "politician" as a pejorative term. They support Trump because he's "his own man," "not a politician," "says what he means," "unbeholden to anyone else," etc. They don't seem to hold any particular governing philosphy in common, which should surprise no one, since Trump has not articulated any.

Their scorn of "politics" and "politicians" also leads them to ignore the essentials of political science, viz. no one governs unless he or she gets elected. Moreover, even elected officials cannot enact legislation without obtaining at least a majority of their fellow legislators to support that legislation. The Trumpians' (and, to some extent, the Berners') seeming disinterest in governing in the real world leads me to think that the Trumpians really want to whine, not to win.

All of this means that unless Trump gets the nomination, a very large number of Trumpians won't vote for the Republican nominee. Unless the Berners do the same with the Democrats (much less likely, in my opinion), Trump's presence has guaranteed Hillary's victory.

All true and you can see Sanders supporters falling for similar fallacies. I'm a bit of a broken record with this but I still bristle at Democrats crowing about the fractures in the Republican coalition while ignoring that the significance of this largely ends with the White House.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 21, 2016 - 09:43am PT
That's a good article. One assumed that the original point of his candidacy was to pull Clinton to the left and create an organization. It would be great to see him move to building that again instead of directly attacking Clinton.
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Apr 21, 2016 - 11:02am PT
I agree with your analysis, Norton. We Republicans find ourselves in a real bind because a strong majority of us do not support a Trump nomination, but we have not agreed on an alternative candidate, so Trump has a plurality of votes cast. Judging by my somewhat limited conversation with Trump supporters, they see little difference between the other Republican candidates and those of the Democrats.

I find it particularly significant that most of the Trumpians with whom I've spoken view "politician" as a pejorative term. They support Trump because he's "his own man," "not a politician," "says what he means," "unbeholden to anyone else," etc. They don't seem to hold any particular governing philosphy in common, which should surprise no one, since Trump has not articulated any.

Their scorn of "politics" and "politicians" also leads them to ignore the essentials of political science, viz. no one governs unless he or she gets elected. Moreover, even elected officials cannot enact legislation without obtaining at least a majority of their fellow legislators to support that legislation. The Trumpians' (and, to some extent, the Berners') seeming disinterest in governing in the real world leads me to think that the Trumpians really want to whine, not to win.

All of this means that unless Trump gets the nomination, a very large number of Trumpians won't vote for the Republican nominee. Unless the Berners do the same with the Democrats (much less likely, in my opinion), Trump's presence has guaranteed Hillary's victory.

John



John... maybe it's because we are sick and tired of "politics as usual"...
meaning, all politicians do is talk back and forth, then they proceed to get nothing of substance accomplished.

The people demand that something get done about the complete mess that the "illegal immigration" has caused our Nation and our state, California.

For two decades, at least, both parties have given lip service to this issue and other pressing matters, while finding the time and energy to increase taxes, dream up a Hi-speed train money hole, and hassle us over how many bullets fit into the magazine, etc.

The Republican genius party leaders who know so much have given us two total losers for the past two elections.... this time they wanted JEB! so bad cause its HIS turn. Problem with that... he is a 9% at best....

Now the party geniuses, who know it all, want to discredit Mr. Trump and Senator Cruz as being "not worthy" and scam up some way to keep ether one of those dudes from being the nominee.

When and if that happens, it will indeed toss the election to Hillary because I will, and I think i'm not alone, pull the leaver for Hillary!!!

I do hope that when that happens the current Republican Party "leaders" will loose support and then maybe something will change.

I think a good start would be to go and have the Evangelical Wing form their own party and they can keep to a biblical stance and fight for what they believe.

The rest of us who simply wish for our Government to be fiscally prudent and freedom loving can form up a party of people who are moderate .... and that includes many Democrats.

end o rant....

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 21, 2016 - 11:56am PT
Thanks for the response, guyman. I see many reasons why nothing substantial gets done until after the fact, and then it's usually "too much too late." One big reason, to me, is the inability of current members of congress, and representatives in particular, to enter into any meaningful compromise. In California, as in so many other states, the districts have become so one-sided that only the most extreme of either party can get the nomination, except for a few districts in a few suburban areas, and places like the Central Valley, where centrists still prevail.

The press doesn't help, either, since their political reporting would be better used to cover, say, the Iditarod; they only report standings in the race, not how their ideas relate to governance. Then again, given the general level of economic illiteracy in modern journalism, maybe I should be grateful.

In any case, my gripes about Cruz and Trump differ. Trump's campaign thus far has been nothing but platitudes. Yes, a country that cannot control its borders loses its sovereignty. Just how, exactly can Trump execute his proposals? He's going to make Mexico pay for a fence? He may as well say the tooth fairy will provide the funds. More importantly, his neo-isolationism and protectionism is the last thing this economy needs. Economoics is not a zero-sum game, at least not to knowledgeable Republicans. That philosphy has more to do with Bernie's world view. Even Hillary's economic and foreign policy - for all its flaws - would better serve the country than Trump's.

My gripe with Cruz is that he's simply the Republicans' verson of Obama, but without Obama's personal appeal. He has yet to demonstrate the ability to work with enough legislators to get necessary legislation enacted. Unlike Obama (or Hillary or even Bernie), when Cruz's opposition fails to compromise, the press will blame Cruz, and we will not only lose an opportunity to govern constructively, but we'll hand the Democrats a bigger victory because so few people view Cruz favorably.

It's interesting. My father was born fifty years before me, and it seems like everything that happened to him happened to me fifty years later, except for WWII. What WWI was to his generation, Viet Nam was to ours. When, in 1964, it seemed certain that Johnson would win, my father, at the time the only Republican in our family, hoped that Johnson would pick a good man as his running mate. Even though my father's ideology differed greatly from Hubert Humphrey's, he thought Humphrey was a good man (in contrast to what he thought of Johnson), and was relieved when Johnson chose him as VP. I fear that I find myself in a similar position; I hope Hillary chooses a good person as her running mate.

After all, if obstruction of justice can bring down a president, the choice of running mate may be of vital importance in this election!

;>)

John

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 21, 2016 - 12:12pm PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 21, 2016 - 01:39pm PT
http://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/723125136170213376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw


Trump affirms bathroom choice for transgender people.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 21, 2016 - 01:56pm PT
I do hope that when that happens the current Republican Party "leaders" will loose support and then maybe something will change.

guyman, regarding the Republican party "changing", I know a lot of Republicans who read the study that the RNC commissioned after losing so badly to Obama in 2012, that study was really good in that it detailed the reasons why large blocks of the electorate choose to vote Democrat rather than Republican.

Prominent it that study were warnings to Republican politicians to be much more careful and to tone down what they say when campaigning, such as to not talk about women's reproductive parts being immune from rape (Todd Akin Senate loss), and to avoid questions about their non support for a minimum wage, on and on really good suggestions such as not talking about "rounding up illegals" or "self deportation", etc

Another suggestions was to campaign being "for" something rather than being constantly "against" whatever the Democrats are for.

however, the study seems to have fallen on death ears and as a result the Republicans are facing another very significant loss in November, no doubt another study will be commissioned to examine the reasons for the upcoming loss......
guyman

Social climber
Moorpark, CA.
Apr 21, 2016 - 02:09pm PT
JE... thank you for your response.

Can't wait to vote, California just might play a large role this time.


EDIT: Norton... thanks for your response as well. I don't know why they just don't keep to a simple msg of: Lets not spend more $$$$$ than we must. Its hard to tell stupid.."don't be stupid".

I wish we could just toss out the entire religious component of the party and keep the ones who believe in Freedom (freedom is a lot like porn, hard to define but I know it when I see it)

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2016 - 03:23pm PT
Hey John
Most of these primaries have been closed primaries

Hence, only Republicans are voting for Trump
Democrats and Independents can't even vote for Trump if they wanted to

another speculative theory down the tubes


Norton, 60% is s slim margin?? WTF??
a slim margin would be 34% out of the three

Trump has crapped on the entire field.
and who is 2nd in line, Lying Ted, the most hated politician alive today.


Guyman
The whole GOP idea of freedom is just another lie that they use to get dupes to vote for them. Like abortion, they spout about it to get votes, but just muddy the waters on issue as a whole

The truth is the GOP has taken your freedoms away, or kept them from you as they progress with the times, while the Dems fight to keep them alive.
So yes, you know when you see it, but no, you don't know where it comes from.

let us know about these freedoms that you say come from voting GOP?



but if your idea of freedom is to be able to be a bigoted, racist a-hole, xenophobe, homophobe, selfish bastard; then the GOP is for you.
Take freedoms away from others just for spite, right? F-em.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 21, 2016 - 03:31pm PT
Norton, 60% is s slim margin?? WTF??

don't know what you are talking about, I never said it was a slim margin
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2016 - 03:34pm PT
and as time has gone on his winning margins are getting progressively slimmer in
addition to actually losing some states outright to both Cruz and nice guy Kasich
Norton
Norton

Social climber
Apr 21, 2016 - 03:36pm PT
?

Craig, saying his margins are "getting" slimmer is not the same as saying 60% is a slim margin, ok?

now do you want to drop this or continue on trying to catch me on something? This is pointless
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2016 - 04:20pm PT
Take er easy there big boy
It just didn't make sense to me then
sorry
WBraun

climber
Apr 21, 2016 - 04:41pm PT
The stupid atheist hypocrite politards have been 0wned by their own candidate.


Bwaahahahaha
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
Apr 21, 2016 - 04:54pm PT
^

I wonder how many candidates who profess to believe the Bible is the word of God read this part:

Exodus 22:21, “You must not mistreat or oppress foreigners in any way. Remember, you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt.”
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 21, 2016 - 05:49pm PT
Reading this now

Lies, Incorporated: The World of Post-Truth Politics
Paperback – April 19, 2016

by Ari Rabin-Havt

In today’s post-truth political landscape, there is a carefully concealed but ever-growing industry of organized misinformation that exists to create and disseminate lies in the service of political agendas. Ari Rabin-Havt and Media Matters for America present a revelatory history of this industry—which they've dubbed Lies, Incorporated—and show how it has crippled legislative progress on issues including tobacco regulation, public health care, climate change, gun control, immigration, abortion, and same-sex marriage. Eye-opening and indispensable, Lies, Incorporated takes an unflinching look at the powerful network of politicians and special interest groups that have launched coordinated assaults on the truth to shape American politics.


Big money is spent on lies
and no one can stop the dupes believing the industrial lies from their faux sources
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 21, 2016 - 06:29pm PT
Senator Clinton: I think the whole Bible is real. The whole Bible gives you a glimpse of God and God’s desire for a personal relationship, but we can’t possibly understand every way God is communicating with us. I’ve always felt that people who try to shoehorn in their cultural and social understandings of the time into the Bible might be actually missing the larger point that we’re supposed to take from the Bible.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 21, 2016 - 06:35pm PT
Senator Clinton: I think the whole Bible is real

damn it

I was going to vote for her but this is the last straw...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 22, 2016 - 08:23am PT
[Click to View YouTube Video]


tl;dr- FOX is done with #nevertrump



Trump, unsurprisingly, got back to his campaign people who informed him that his show of humanity is not acceptable to his constituency and pulled a 180 on his acceptance of transgender people using restrooms of their choice claiming, of course, "states rights."

Less than 24 hours after saying transgender individuals should be able to “use the bathroom they feel is appropriate,” Donald Trump backtracked from that pro-LGBT position. Speaking with Sean Hannity on Fox News Thursday evening, the Republican presidential frontrunner decided that while he still believes North Carolina’s law overturning local anti-discrimination ordinances is “causing a lot of problems,” he thinks “local communities and states should make the decision. The federal government should not be involved.” This comes despite the fact that there was never any questions over whether the feds should have a say in the matter.


[Click to View YouTube Video]

It's happening! Artists are rallying around Trump's message like they did in 2008 for Obama!! IT'S HAPPENING!!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 25, 2016 - 05:27am PT
Cruz and Kasich are teaming up to deprive Trump of as many delegates as possible to force a contested convention. I still can't believe we thought 2016 couldn't top 2012. The popcorn factor of this election is legendary.



Here's an interesting article suggesting that America should adopt laws that allow citizens to freely wander around on private land such as permissive in Europe.

A COUPLE of years ago, I trespassed across America. I’d set out to hike the proposed route of the Keystone XL pipeline, which had been planned to stretch over a thousand miles over the Great Plains, from Alberta, Canada, to the Gulf Coast. To walk the pipe’s route, roads wouldn’t do. I’d have to cross fields, hop barbed-wire fences and camp in cow pastures — much of it on private property.

I’d figured that walking across the heartland would probably be unlawful, unprecedented and a little bit crazy. We Americans, after all, are forbidden from entering most of our private lands. But in some European countries, walking almost wherever you want is not only ordinary but perfectly acceptable.

In Sweden, they call it “allemansrätt.” In Finland, it’s “jokamiehenoikeus.” In Scotland, it’s “the right to roam.” Germany allows walking through privately owned forests, unused meadows and fallow fields. In 2000, England and Wales passed the Countryside and Rights of Way Act, which gave people access to “mountain, moor, heath or down.”

Nordic and Scottish laws are even more generous. The 2003 Scottish Land Reform Act opened up the whole country for a number of pastimes, including mountain biking, horseback riding, canoeing, swimming, sledding, camping and most any activity that does not involve a motorized vehicle, so long as it’s carried out “responsibly.” In Sweden, landowners may be prohibited from putting up fences for the sole purpose of keeping people out. Walkers in many of these places do not have to pay money, ask for permission or obtain permits.

We’re not nearly as welcoming in America. Travel across rural America and you’ll spot “No Trespassing” and “Private Property” signs posted on trees and fence posts everywhere. And even where there aren’t signs, Americans know they don’t have the implicit permission to visit their town’s neighboring woods, fields and coastlines. Long gone are the days when we could, like Henry David Thoreau on the outskirts of his native Concord, Mass., freely saunter “through the woods and over the hills and fields, absolutely free from all worldly engagements.”

I hope to god this is photoshopped....



Charles Koch expressed concern about the level of personal attacks being leveled in the Republican presidential race and hinted that Clinton might make a better President. Clinton immediately rebuked what the media is making sound like a tacit endorsement.




The Sanders campaign continues to make propaganda that is eagerly reposted to my Facebook feed by eager supporters. It's hard to wrap my head around the logic here. The implication here is that despite Clinton's massive war chest, "the people" don't support her. To make this conceit work one has to ignore the fact that Sanders has raised the exact same amount of money and has garnered millions fewer votes. Additionally, one has to believe that the race is at all dependent on national polling which it isn't.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 25, 2016 - 06:13am PT
The only Bern I'm feeling is Bern-out.

As for Kasich...he's won 1 state. That's it. If he worms the nomination, he loses by a mile.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 25, 2016 - 09:35am PT
Dingus, that's most literal interpretation in the Bible I've ever seen.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 25, 2016 - 10:56am PT
And now, the evil Charles Koch thinks Hillary may be a better candidate than the Republican nominee. He also finds Trump's proposal to bar entry of Muslims into the U.S. "monstrous." Meanwhile, undeterred by the reality that some of Koch's political positions agree with hers, Hillary attacks Bernie because he sometimes takes a position consistent with that of the Koch brothers.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/24/politics/charles-koch-hillary-clinton-2016/index.html

I point this out because politics in the U.S. has become a game of demonization which, in my opinion, has contributed mightily to the polarized paralysis of modern national "governance." Instead of seizing on points of common ground to make progress, we'd rather keep our political opponents anathematized.

John
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Apr 25, 2016 - 11:00am PT
I point this out because politics in the U.S. has become a game of demonization

separation of church and state please!
dirtbag

climber
Apr 25, 2016 - 11:01am PT
Good points, John.

I expect Bernie to say "See, even Charles Koch would vote for Hillary."

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 26, 2016 - 05:20am PT
John posted
I point this out because politics in the U.S. has become a game of demonization which, in my opinion, has contributed mightily to the polarized paralysis of modern national "governance." Instead of seizing on points of common ground to make progress, we'd rather keep our political opponents anathematized.

FASCIST


(you're quite right)
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 26, 2016 - 05:49am PT
Hillary attacks Bernie because he sometimes takes a position consistent with that of the Koch brothers.

"Attacks"?? Wow, are we all in danger of overusing that word.

Sometimes words like "compare & contrast", "argues" and "points out" are more appropriate. But, I suppose that makes our target sound more reasonable.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 26, 2016 - 06:06am PT
When you're as emotional about someone as many Sanders supporters are about him anything short of "I feel the Bern!" is vicious slander.




Trump is pretty clueless.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 26, 2016 - 07:04am PT
4. Free college tuition. This one’s tighter, but even here, a poll last year showed people supporting it by 46-41 percent. That same poll showed more generally that people agreed with the idea, much more broadly reflective of the position of the Democratic Party, that no one should have to go into debt to attend a public university, by 62 to 29 percent. Radicals!

Just this one item jumped out at me, but it's applicable to a great many others.

There are still a large percentage of people in this country that hold the opinion that "the government" provides all manner of things but don't even think for a moment where that money comes from. They consider it like mana from heaven literally.

These people are still under the illusion that the government just magically prints that money (which admittedly of late is a truth stranger than fiction) and have no concept that the money is taken from other hard working people.

I contend that if these surveys spent a modicum of time explaining to people how the money is provided for "free education" and a whole host of other things we would see that group of people split in two: One group would not appreciate the reality that the government is taking away money from hard working people to give to others (especially if that lesson is taught by taking away their hard earned money as example) and the other group, which appears to be well represented here, would say "damn right!" take it from them greedy bastards.

Those survey results would be much more illustrative if our government were not so invested in obfuscating where the mana from heaven comes from.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 26, 2016 - 08:19am PT
Escopeta - That's just silly.

Free means free.

OPM

Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 26, 2016 - 08:26am PT
Free means free.

Wait, somebody has to pay for watering the tree, don't they?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 26, 2016 - 09:50am PT
Wondering why Trump seemed to chill out and then turned around and went "full Trump" again? Sounds like he hired and then immediately rebelled against his new campaign advisor.

Trump rejects new adviser’s push to make him ‘presidential’

Donald Trump is bristling at efforts to implement a more conventional presidential campaign strategy, and has expressed misgivings about the political guru behind them, Paul Manafort, for overstepping his bounds, multiple sources close to the campaign tell POLITICO.
Trump became upset late last week when he learned from media reports that Manafort privately told Republican leaders that the billionaire reality TV star was “projecting an image” for voters and would begin toning down his rhetoric, according to the sources. They said that Trump also expressed concern about Manafort bringing several former lobbying colleagues into the campaign, as first reported by POLITICO.

Now Trump is taking steps to return some authority to Manafort’s chief internal rival, campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.

Neither Lewandowski nor Manafort responded to requests for comment, though Manafort on Sunday during an interview on Fox News blamed Lewandowski’s regime for shortcomings in the campaign’s delegate wrangling operation. Lewandowski’s allies responded by privately questioning whether Manafort has done anything to improve the situation. They grumble that Manafort has spent a disproportionate amount of time on television — just as Trump himself has been avoiding the Sunday morning talk show circuit at Manafort’s urging.


Escopeta posted
There are still a large percentage of people in this country that hold the opinion that "the government" provides all manner of things but don't even think for a moment where that money comes from. They consider it like mana from heaven literally.

These people are still under the illusion that the government just magically prints that money (which admittedly of late is a truth stranger than fiction) and have no concept that the money is taken from other hard working people.

I think I found a picture of one of them:

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 26, 2016 - 10:28am PT

Future Cruz assassin identified.




(Straw, Dingus. Come on, man.)
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 26, 2016 - 10:30am PT
Escopeta - That's just silly.

Free means free.

In considering this, we need to remember the two great truths of political economics:

1. (Friedman's Reiteration) "Ain't no free lunch." The ancient Greeks knew this principle, but the particularly elegant expression of it comes from the late Milton Friedman.

2. (The Iron Law of Distribution) "Them what has, got." This explains who obtains the real benefits of government largesse.

John
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Apr 26, 2016 - 10:58am PT

Balers? Grass roots? Hayboys?

I don't get it?

DMT

Self-Portrait
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 27, 2016 - 08:20am PT
John posted
1. (Friedman's Reiteration) "Ain't no free lunch." The ancient Greeks knew this principle, but the particularly elegant expression of it comes from the late Milton Friedman.

There is another important political axiom that doesn't get enough attention: "You never don't pay."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 27, 2016 - 10:57am PT
RedState last week: New York never mattered, Ted Cruz won the Presidency

Mathematically Trump has been out for a while, it is a Contested Convention.

The odds of Trump getting the nomination is now under 1% in my view.

So, here I am, the first of the major and minor Statisticians, I am calling the election formally for Ted Cruz

RedState today: The GOP electorate gave up to Donald Trump last night, but we should not.

It's not over after Trump bombed Pearl Harbor. Stand with Ted.
I’m not ready to give up. If Trump is the nominee, I’m voting for Hillary Clinton in a swing state, so I’m not giving up and burning down this Grand Old Party until he wins the vote in Cleveland. I’m confident Ted Cruz isn’t giving up, either.

Stand with Ted. Keep on fighting. The Republican Party has a proud history and it’d be a shame to see it burned down by the likes of Donald Trump.


Also: rumor has it that Cruz will announce Fiorina as his VP pick today at 16:00


*edit*


Woot! Actually happening!
dirtbag

climber
Apr 27, 2016 - 11:10am PT
Yeah, fiorina would help him win for sure.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 27, 2016 - 11:12am PT
Presumably, all those women currently rooting for Hillary will switch to Cruz/Fiorina because gender card.
Contractor

Boulder climber
CA
Apr 27, 2016 - 03:27pm PT
Holy sh#t- Cruz/Fiorina!!!!!

That makes my skin crawl...

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Apr 27, 2016 - 06:09pm PT
Serial Sexual Pedophilic Predator

That's how the judge described Denny Hastert, the longest running Republican Speaker of the House,
third in line to be President, running the world's largest economy for the Republican Party donors during the Bush years, which collapsed in the final days costing trillions
no Republican cares
It's all about something Hillary may have done with her e-mail.



Dennis Hastert Admits He Sexually Abused Former Students, Gets 15 Months In Jail For Fraud

He has been investigated for circumventing bank regulations to help cover up the allegations.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dennis-hastert-sentence-abuse_us_5713f320e4b0018f9cba558d
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
Apr 27, 2016 - 07:03pm PT
15 months in jail with a picture of Fiorina over his bed = cruel and unusual punishment...
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Apr 27, 2016 - 07:31pm PT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 28, 2016 - 04:48am PT

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 28, 2016 - 06:21am PT
You are not going to rein in this clown or suddenly make him a disciplined person. He's not interested in any policy deeper than a sentence or two. He us truly an idiot, with the exception of salesmanship.

His foreign policy "speech" yesterday was a disaster, a complete joke. When he has to read someone's words from a teleprompter, the lack of understanding shows. It was incoherent and bizarre.

Yes, he's a threat because so many American's buy this crap. It's great TV and Americans love TV. And the TV executives love the ratings.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Apr 28, 2016 - 06:44am PT
We have met the enemy...
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 28, 2016 - 06:48am PT
Everyone hates Ted Cruz (and politicians are way cooler once they retire):

“You can call me boner, beaner, jackass, happy to answer to almost anything,” said former Speaker of the House John Boehner as he took the stage at CEMEX Auditorium on Wednesday evening. Boehner joined David M. Kennedy, faculty director and history professor emeritus, in a talk hosted by Stanford in Government (SIG) and the Stanford Speakers Bureau.

...

Much of the discussion – and laughs – focused on Boehner’s views on the current presidential candidates. Segueing into the topic, Kennedy asked Boehner to be frank given that the event was not being broadcasted, and the former Speaker responded in kind. When specifically asked his opinions on Ted Cruz, Boehner made a face, drawing laughter from the crowd.

“Lucifer in the flesh,” the former speaker said. “I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life.”

Boehner described other Republican candidates as friends. In particular, the former speaker said he has played golf with Donald Trump for years and that they were “texting buddies.”
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
Apr 28, 2016 - 06:59am PT
Crankloon you sound concerned that TRUMP will make it all the way.. is your head going to explode over hillarys face..
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 28, 2016 - 11:59am PT
McGovern, Mondale, Nader, Sanders.
dirtbag

climber
Apr 28, 2016 - 12:17pm PT
Boehner always seemed like an ok guy personally.
Fritz

Trad climber
Choss Creek, ID
Apr 28, 2016 - 06:58pm PT
Another reason why the Republican U.S. House of Representatives needs to be voted out of office.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Thursday to repeal a Labor Department rule aimed at protecting retirement savers from profit-hungry brokers, a largely symbolic move that President Barack Obama has threatened to veto.

Obama's administration earlier in April released the rule setting a fiduciary standard for financial brokers who sell retirement products, requiring them to put clients' best interests ahead of their bottom lines.

Republican political leaders and some in the financial industry responded by trying to override it through legislation, saying complying with it would be expensive for brokers which would result in higher costs for retirement advice that many Americans could not afford. They also say that the rule does not take into account other laws and regulations on financial advice.

Thursday's vote of 234 in favor, and 183 opposed split along party lines. Democrats said the fiduciary rule would protect families from paying higher fees and that the Obama administration took into consideration industry concerns when drafting the rule.

"Bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. have no business getting between you and your financial planner. But that’s what the Obama administration’s fiduciary rule does," said House Speaker Paul Ryan in a statement after the vote. "It’s Obamacare for financial planning."

The Senate would have to take up and pass a version of the resolution and then Congress would send a combined bill to Obama to sign into law.

Obama made clear that would not happen in a statement issued on Wednesday saying the final Labor Department rule "reflects extensive feedback from industry, advocates, and members of Congress, and has been streamlined to reduce the compliance burden and ensure continued access to advice."

The rule has followed a long path to fruition. It was first proposed in 2010 and a year later the Labor Department, which oversees retirement plans, had to rescind it in the face of enormous industry backlash.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-votes-repeal-u-retirement-rule-obama-threatens-203619282--sector.html
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Apr 28, 2016 - 07:18pm PT
^^ Bloody leeches.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 29, 2016 - 06:31am PT
Fritz posted
The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Thursday to repeal a Labor Department rule aimed at protecting retirement savers from profit-hungry brokers, a largely symbolic move that President Barack Obama has threatened to veto.

This is an incredibly significant change that will save consumers billions of dollars that the financial sector leeches out of the pockets of a population already struggling to save money. The idea that Republicans want to block it is truly nauseating. Don't they care about the ecomomy?


crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 29, 2016 - 06:35am PT
If Trump get the nomination, Brooks is 100% correct, imo:

Donald Trump now looks set to be the Republican presidential nominee. So for those of us appalled by this prospect — what are we supposed to do?

Well, not what the leaders of the Republican Party are doing. They’re going down meekly and hoping for a quiet convention. They seem blithely unaware that this is a Joe McCarthy moment. People will be judged by where they stood at this time. Those who walked with Trump will be tainted forever after for the degradation of standards and the general election slaughter.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/opinion/if-not-trump-what.html
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 29, 2016 - 08:19am PT
If stoopid Americans would educate themselves just a teensy bit , instead of watching TV,
they wouldn't put themselves in the clutches of these sleaze bag so-called investment advisors.
I warrant the average stoopid American researches the car he is buying more than his
finances. The more salient point is that only one out of three have any retirement funds to
concern themselves with cause they're too busy buying cars they shouldn't and looking at
Facebook, or SuperTopo. These are the same people that bought houses they couldn't
afford 10 years ago with adjustable rate mortgages. Research has shown that a high percent-
age either didn't know they had an adjustable rate mortgage or didn't understand what it
meant! Are you kidding me? Did they even graduate from high school?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 29, 2016 - 09:03am PT
Reilly: "It's always the victims fault."

Requiring that financial advisers act as such instead of acting as salesmen steering people towards investments that make the brokerage money while leaving the clients short is a no-brainer. There is no way for your average American to understand complex financial decisions without help. This change largely affects "actively managed" funds which have been shown on average to perform more poorly than passively managed funds while reaping much higher profits for the people selling them. The "idiots" who invested in them include large pensions and institutions and very smart, educated people. If someone can tell you "I'm going to give you good advice on how to invest your money" they should have a legally binding fiduciary responsibility to do so.


These are the same people that bought houses they couldn't
afford 10 years ago with adjustable rate mortgages. Research has shown that a high percent-
age either didn't know they had an adjustable rate mortgage or didn't understand what it
meant! Are you kidding me? Did they even graduate from high school?

People don't learn this stuff in high school, Reilly. And a lot of people were sold them with the idea that they could "just refinance" when the interest rate spike. No big deal. Then the economy tanked and those people couldn't find anyone to allow them to refinance because nobody was lending money. The whole industry was geared towards getting people into houses they couldn't afford. Insisting the only person at fault is the person who thought their day had finally arrived that they could take part in the American Dream is pretty douchy. Have you ever bought a house? Did you read every page of your loan? Every page of your disclosure? Or did you ask someone to give you the bits you thought were most important and then blindly initial most of it and sign the dotted line?



Crank- Brooks is right and also represents a really tiny sliver of Republicans. The conservative id couldn't care less.
Norton

Social climber
Apr 29, 2016 - 09:30am PT
A new poll from the Pew Research Center shows that the GOP is overwhelmingly hated by the American public and has reached its highest level of disdain since 1992.


According to the poll, 62 percent of Americans have an unfavorable impression of the GOP whereas only 33 percent view it favorably. American’s positive perception of the GOP fell four points in the last six months.

The poll also found a very interesting trend: most of the negativity towards the GOP came from self-identified Republicans, where only 68 had a favorable view of their own party — an 11 point drop from October.

62 percent of women have an unfavorable view of the Republican Party
79 percent of black people have an unfavorable view of the Republican Party
61 percent of Hispanics have an unfavorable view of the Republican Party
Unfavorable views of the GOP are between 60 and 73 percent among college-educated – some college, graduate, postgraduate, respectively.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Apr 29, 2016 - 11:33am PT
Reince Priebus? Wasn't he in 200 Motels?

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 29, 2016 - 11:44am PT
Agree, HDDJ. Trump voters aren't reading the editorial pages of the major papers. It's talk radio, Drudge and Breitbart.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
Apr 29, 2016 - 01:16pm PT
There is no way for your average American to understand complex financial decisions without help.

Complex, as in the hugely arcane difference between front-loaded and
no-load mutual funds? If you can't understand that then you're not gonna
have to worry about investing sh!t.

If you can't figure out that a fund that charges 3% management fees is not
a good deal compared to a Vanguard fund that charges 0,2% then you need to
start buying beachfront property in Nebraska. If you're that phukking
stoopid then you go to a fee only advisor who will explain that higher math
stuff to you in monosyllabic sentences. If you're too stoopid to go onto
Fidelity's or Vanguard's websites and educate yourself from their many well
explained articles then you deserve to retire to a single wide in Stocton.
Furthermore, do you seriously think that those numbnuts in Washington can
write a bill that will have any meaningful effect? BwaHaHaHa! The Nanny
State strikes again with its new brand of Fiduciary Responsibility Butt Wipe!

And as far as large pension funds go those are run by some of the dumbest
phuks on the planet who have repeatedly demonstrated their complete inability
to understand and grasp the importance of D-I-V-E-R-S-I-F-I-C-A-T-I-O-N.
Not to mention they've repeatedly demonstrated their ability to succumb to
ball-cupping by sleaze bag hedge funds.

People don't learn this stuff in high school, Reilly
Well, I'm glad that we agree on one thing. I distinctly recall learning
percentages in, like, the 5th grade or thereabouts so, you're right,
it wasn't high school.


Oh, and here's a nice BBC.com article about your wonderful French economy:

What is the French economic problem?

57% work for the gubmint - what could go wrong with that? Oh, wait,
14% don't work at all so that means 39% work their asses off to pay
for the gubmint cubicle pukes and the dole layabouts. Yeah, that
sounds like a gud long term plan.



HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 29, 2016 - 09:15pm PT
And yet the French still have one of the largest economies in the world. That must really make your balls ache.
dirtbag

climber
Apr 29, 2016 - 09:23pm PT
Let me guess. You are offended by the "off the reservation" comment. Or Benghazi. Or Vince Foster. Or something.
John M

climber
Apr 29, 2016 - 09:28pm PT
Reilly are you average intelligence?...


since most everyone should be able to do what you can do.




Edit: I generally think of you as above average.

.......

Edit:

VVVVVV

.I asked a simple question

LOL.. more like loaded. potillary..

crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 30, 2016 - 07:21am PT
First, her name is Hillary.
Second, nobody cares about your supposed "gaffe".

Sheesh...6 more months + 8 years of this kind of nonsense.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 30, 2016 - 07:49am PT

Or maybe Trump supporters and religious zealots just believe any stupid thing that crosses their internet screen.
If they turned it off along with the TV they'd know that America is already great.




crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Apr 30, 2016 - 08:00am PT
If everyone left running is a puppet, who are you voting for?

Eric Sloan?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 2, 2016 - 05:33am PT
Obama has a great send off WHCD performance. His video had some weird edits towards the end but the bit with Boehner was gold. Leading off with the Hillary jokes was great too.

[Click to View YouTube Video]


Clinton only needs 38% of the remaining elected delegates to clinch a majority of them. Still, Sanders supporters keep churning out misleading propaganda:

WBraun

climber
May 2, 2016 - 07:27am PT
CNN one of the most disgusting mainstream news media outlets in the US.

It's a CIA news media brainwash front for stupid Americans.

And the politards here swallow everything they put out.

And this post has nothing to do with your stupid politarded loonism ....
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 2, 2016 - 08:00am PT
I just can't get why people keep trying to make this election about race...

Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has received a new endorsement from the Imperial Wizard of the Rebel Brigade Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). The Klan leader, who was merely identified as the "Imperial Wizard" by WWBT 12, said the group supports Trump's views because they reflect their own views.

"I think Donald Trump would be best for the job," the Klan leader said. "The reason a lot of Klan members like Donald Trump is because a lot of what he believes in, we believe in. We want our country to be safe."

According to the NBC affiliate, the Imperial Wizard said he supports Trump's proposal to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the US."If Donald Trump dropped out tomorrow I would support Kasich before i would Ted Cruz because he is not an American citizen," he added.

"Even if I agree with some of the things that Ted Cruz says, I would not support him because he was born in Canada. He is not an American citizen."
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 3, 2016 - 04:58am PT
I still don't get why people think there is a racial component to Trump's campaign...



Ugh...what does any of this have to do with Clinton being a woman? STOP PLAYING THE WOMANS CARD!!



This was pretty clever



The National Review continues to lose their goddam minds about Trump:

On race, Trump supporters are tired of hearing that black lives matter, while no one mentions that all lives matter. They are sick of seeing protestors wave the flag of the country they do not wish illegal aliens to be sent back to and trash the country they under no circumstances want them to leave. They don’t like getting a letter from an IRS that employs Lois Lerner — a letter that would be ignored with impunity by those who are here illegally, or who run the Clinton Foundation. They are tired of wealthy minorities claiming they are perpetual victims of ill-treatment at the hands of people who are less well off than they. They don’t like hearing from elites that huge trade deficits have little to do with loss of jobs or that cheating by our trade partners is just a passing glitch in free trade. They cannot stand lectures from those who make more money in an hour than they do in a year about their own bad habits or slothfulness. They don’t know what the on-screen savants mean by a leg-tingle or a perfectly pressed pant leg or a first-class temperament or a president as god — and they don’t care to find out. They do not hate political correctness so much as one-sided political correctness, which gives a pass to some to say things that would get others fired or ruined. They don’t want to be lectured that their own plight is part of a larger, healthy creative destruction or a leaner, meaner competitiveness or an overdue restructuring — by those who are never destroyed, rendered noncompetitive, or restructured. And they don’t like to be talked down to by the experts who ran up $10 trillion in debt, ruined the health-care system, dismantled the military, and screwed up the Secret Service, the IRS, NASA, and the VA. Trump is their megaphone, not their solution. The Trump supporters have seen plenty of politicians with important agendas, but few with the zeal to push them through; at this late date, they would apparently prefer zeal without agendas to agendas without zeal.

Trump has no loyalty to the Republican establishment or to the conservative movement. The apparent greatest attraction for his supporters is that he drives crazy those who worship Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. And if the Republican establishment implodes with the Obamism it did not stop, well, so goes collateral damage — and in the process, woe to us all.

Trump is for a brief season our long-haired Samson, and the two pillars of the temple he is yanking down are the Republicans to his right and the Democrats to his left — and it will all land on top of us, the Philistines beneath.

“And he bent with all his might so that the house fell on the lords and all the people who were in it. So the dead whom he killed at his death were more than those whom he killed in his life.” Judges 16.30.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 3, 2016 - 05:49am PT
Trump is extremely likely to win in Indiana today which, after a couple weeks where a contested convention seemed likely, will effectively seal Trump as the nominee. He will not have technically clinched the nom but his clear polling advantages in all of the larger remaining states make him the presumptive nominee.

Clinton's lead in Indiana has appeared to widen over the last couple weeks but, given the proportional allocation of delegates in the Democratic race, she could lose every state for the rest of the race by significant margins and still win the majority of elected (pledged) delegates.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 3, 2016 - 07:52pm PT
Every person that wants to be informed MUST Read this BooK

Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right
by Jane Mayer

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-History-Billionaires-Radical/dp/0385535597/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1462328809&sr=1-1&keywords=dark+money+jane+mayer


It documents the rise of the modern Republican/Libertarian ideology and power from the 1950s to now.

It's in an incredible story of the 0.001 percenters perpetual paranoia of the Government or "the people" coming in and taking their money away (freedoms).

The key to the whole start of the millions going into politics was prompted by inheritance tax laws.
The ultra-conservative millionaire fathers would provide a trust for the child and all the interest would have to be given to causes of philanthropy for a certain amount of years.

So these conservatives would set up foundations that were basically right wing think tanks and lobbying groups and they could give their millions in charity to their Non-Profit Foundation TAX FREE (queue IRS scandal), and preserve their 100s of millions in their inheritance trust.

So after seeing how great these things were working in swaying gullible Republicans, they enlisted corporations and other millionaires and the money was astronomical.

Theses paranoid bubble people biggest fear was Government Regulations and taxes. They saw environmental and occupation regulations as worse than communism and had to be fought back before they were put out of business.

Hope to expand on later..

But you can track almost every talking point ever uttered from modern conservatives/libertarians back to these dark money sources that bought the media and Republican Party.

it's all anti-government, anti-regulation BS so they can sway the public to vote for their greedy interests, and it Worked!

It's truly scary
I'm only a 3rd of the way through the book
it's big, 400 pages and wonky, but a very good read if you can go on without getting to depressed about the hopelessness of our Country's current situation.

Of course the only big money source on the left, Unions, have been destroyed by this movement, they have every base covered.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 3, 2016 - 08:16pm PT
Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right

Hardcover – January 19, 2016

by Jane Mayer

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-History-Billionaires-Radical/dp/0385535597/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1462328809&sr=1-1&keywords=dark+money+jane+mayer


Why is America living in an age of profound economic inequality? Why, despite the desperate need to address climate change, have even modest environmental efforts been defeated again and again? Why have protections for employees been decimated? Why do hedge-fund billionaires pay a far lower tax rate than middle-class workers?
The conventional answer is that a popular uprising against “big government” led to the ascendancy of a broad-based conservative movement. But as Jane Mayer shows in this powerful, meticulously reported history, a network of exceedingly wealthy people with extreme libertarian views bankrolled a systematic, step-by-step plan to fundamentally alter the American political system.
The network has brought together some of the richest people on the planet. Their core beliefs—that taxes are a form of tyranny; that government oversight of business is an assault on freedom—are sincerely held. But these beliefs also advance their personal and corporate interests: Many of their companies have run afoul of federal pollution, worker safety, securities, and tax laws.
The chief figures in the network are Charles and David Koch, whose father made his fortune in part by building oil refineries in Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Germany. The patriarch later was a founding member of the John Birch Society, whose politics were so radical it believed Dwight Eisenhower was a communist. The brothers were schooled in a political philosophy that asserted the only role of government is to provide security and to enforce property rights.
When libertarian ideas proved decidedly unpopular with voters, the Koch brothers and their allies chose another path. If they pooled their vast resources, they could fund an interlocking array of organizations that could work in tandem to influence and ultimately control academic institutions, think tanks, the courts, statehouses, Congress, and, they hoped, the presidency. Richard Mellon Scaife, the mercurial heir to banking and oil fortunes, had the brilliant insight that most of their political activities could be written off as tax-deductible “philanthropy.”
These organizations were given innocuous names such as Americans for Prosperity. Funding sources were hidden whenever possible. This process reached its apotheosis with the allegedly populist Tea Party movement, abetted mightily by the Citizens United decision—a case conceived of by legal advocates funded by the network.
The political operatives the network employs are disciplined, smart, and at times ruthless. Mayer documents instances in which people affiliated with these groups hired private detectives to impugn whistle-blowers, journalists, and even government investigators. And their efforts have been remarkably successful. Libertarian views on taxes and regulation, once far outside the mainstream and still rejected by most Americans, are ascendant in the majority of state governments, the Supreme Court, and Congress. Meaningful environmental, labor, finance, and tax reforms have been stymied.
Jane Mayer spent five years conducting hundreds of interviews-including with several sources within the network-and scoured public records, private papers, and court proceedings in reporting this book. In a taut and utterly convincing narrative, she traces the byzantine trail of the billions of dollars spent by the network and provides vivid portraits of the colorful figures behind the new American oligarchy.
Dark Money is a book that must be read by anyone who cares about the future of American democracy.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 3, 2016 - 09:11pm PT
Typing Republican/Libertarian is like writing Christian/Atheist
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 4, 2016 - 07:03am PT
Escopeta posted
Typing Republican/Libertarian is like writing Christian/Atheist

Really? They both seem like shades of white to me.



Sam Bee is killing it. I really need to catch up on her show.

HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 4, 2016 - 11:16am PT



http://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/692155362552778752
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
May 6, 2016 - 06:05am PT
The media will work to make the race seem close. It won't be. False equivalence abounds.

Truth and Trumpism

How will the news media handle the battle between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump? I suspect I know the answer — and it’s going to be deeply frustrating. But maybe, just maybe, flagging some common journalistic sins in advance can limit the damage. So let’s talk about what can and probably will go wrong in coverage — but doesn’t have to.

First, and least harmful, will be the urge to make the election seem closer than it is, if only because a close race makes a better story. You can already see this tendency in suggestions that the startling outcome of the fight for the Republican nomination somehow means that polls and other conventional indicators of electoral strength are meaningless.

The truth, however, is that polls have been pretty good indicators all along. Pundits who dismissed the chances of a Trump nomination did so despite, not because of, the polls, which have been showing a large Trump lead for more than eight months.

Oh, and let’s not make too much of any one poll. When many polls are taken, there are bound to be a few outliers, both because of random sampling error and the biases that can creep into survey design. If the average of recent polls shows a strong lead for one candidate — as it does right now for Mrs. Clinton — any individual poll that disagrees with that average should be taken with large helpings of salt.

A more important vice in political coverage, which we’ve seen all too often in previous elections — but will be far more damaging if it happens this time — is false equivalence.

You might think that this would be impossible on substantive policy issues, where the asymmetry between the candidates is almost ridiculously obvious. To take the most striking comparison, Mr. Trump has proposed huge tax cuts with no plausible offsetting spending cuts, yet has also promised to pay down U.S. debt; meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton has proposed modest spending increases paid for by specific tax hikes.

That is, one candidate is engaged in wildly irresponsible fantasy while the other is being quite careful with her numbers. But beware of news analyses that, in the name of “balance,” downplay this contrast.

This isn’t a new phenomenon: Many years ago, when George W. Bush was obviously lying about his budget arithmetic but nobody would report it, I suggested that if a candidate declared that the earth was flat, headlines would read, “Shape of the Planet: Both Sides Have a Point.” But this year it could be much, much worse.

And what about less quantifiable questions about behavior? I’ve already seen pundits suggest that both presumptive nominees fight dirty, that both have taken the “low road” in their campaigns. For the record, Mr. Trump has impugned his rivals’ manhood, called them liars and suggested that Ted Cruz’s father was associated with J.F.K.’s killer. On her side, Mrs. Clinton has suggested that Bernie Sanders hasn’t done his homework on some policy issues. These things are not the same.

Finally, I can almost guarantee that we’ll see attempts to sanitize the positions and motives of Trump supporters, to downplay the racism that is at the heart of the movement and pretend that what voters really care about are the priorities of D.C. insiders — a process I think of as “centrification.”

That is, after all, what happened after the rise of the Tea Party. I’ve seen claims that Tea Partiers were motivated by Wall Street bailouts, or even that the movement was largely about fiscal responsibility, driven by voters upset about budget deficits.

In fact, there was never a hint that any of these things mattered; if you followed the actual progress of the movement, it was always about white voters angry at the thought that their taxes might be used to help Those People, whether via mortgage relief for distressed minority homeowners or health care for low-income families.

Now I’m seeing suggestions that Trumpism is driven by concerns about political gridlock. No, it isn’t. It isn’t even mainly about “economic anxiety.”

Trump support in the primaries was strongly correlated with racial resentment: We’re looking at a movement of white men angry that they no longer dominate American society the way they used to. And to pretend otherwise is to give both the movement and the man who leads it a free pass.

In the end, bad reporting probably won’t change the election’s outcome, because the truth is that those angry white men are right about their declining role. America is increasingly becoming a racially diverse, socially tolerant society, not at all like the Republican base, let alone the plurality of that base that chose Donald Trump.

Still, the public has a right to be properly informed. The news media should do all it can to resist false equivalence and centrification, and report what’s really going on.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/opinion/truth-and-trumpism.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
Shetville , North of Los Angeles
May 6, 2016 - 07:05am PT
Thanks crankster...good read..
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 6, 2016 - 12:41pm PT
Yeah it's interesting to watch the media simultaneously not see any possibility for a Trump win but also be completely insecure about how wrong they've been so far in the election and also be desperate for a good race.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 12, 2016 - 05:03am PT
Well that's some sh#t right there

George Zimmerman auctions gun that killed Trayvon Martin

The gun used to kill Trayvon Martin, a young black teenager who was shot in Florida, is being auctioned at a starting bid of $5,000.

George Zimmerman, the man accused of killing Martin in 2012, has listed the Kel-Tec PF-9 9mm on a gun broker website.

"The firearm for sale is the firearm that was used to defend my life and end the brutal attack from Trayvon Martin on 2/26/2012," says Zimmerman, in the description.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
May 12, 2016 - 06:44am PT
He'd be perfect for a keynote speaking spot at the GOP convention. He'd bring the house down.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 12, 2016 - 06:48am PT
Next on ebay: the full compliment of batons used to beat Rodney King. Own a piece of American history!
dirtbag

climber
May 12, 2016 - 06:50am PT
I'm sure that some puke will fork over whatever amount he is asking without hesitation.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 12, 2016 - 06:50am PT
Later this afternoon: The broom stick used to sodomize Abner Louima. History!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 12, 2016 - 07:25am PT


lol.....this effing guy
dirtbag

climber
May 12, 2016 - 10:13pm PT
Yes, Texas republicans really are going to have a vote to decide whether the state should secede from the United States.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/?nid=menu_nav_politics
TomCochrane

Trad climber
Santa Cruz Mountains and Monterey Bay
May 12, 2016 - 10:26pm PT
We’ve known about the government’s desire to manipulate social media for years. Back in February 2011, just as the wars on Libya and Syria were beginning, an interesting story was published by PC World under the title Army of Fake Social Media Friends to Promote Propaganda which explained in very mundane language that:

…the U.S. government contracted HBGary Federal for the development of software which could create multiple fake social media profiles to manipulate and sway public opinion on controversial issues by promoting propaganda. It could also be used as surveillance to find public opinions with points of view the powers-that-be didn’t like. It could then potentially have their “fake” people run smear campaigns against those “real” people.

Close observers of the US-NATO war on Libya will recall just how many twitter accounts miraculously surfaced, with tens of thousands of followers each, to “report” on the “atrocities” carried out by Muammar Gaddafi’s armed forces, and call for a No Fly Zone and regime change. Certainly one is left to wonder now, as many of us did at the time, whether those accounts weren’t simply fakes created by either a Pentagon computer program, or by paid trolls.

And this last point is perhaps the key: online manipulation is designed to control narratives. While the war may be fought on the battlefield, it is equally fought for the hearts and minds of activists, news consumers, and ordinary citizens in the West. The UK and US both have extensive information war capabilities, and they’re not afraid to use them. And so, we should not be afraid to expose them.

Eric Draitser is an independent geopolitical analyst based in New York City, he is the founder of StopImperialism.org
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
May 12, 2016 - 11:38pm PT
I heard the Zimmerman auction got shut down before it even started.

I don't ever use this, but....

LOL!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 06:52am PT
The auction reached $65 million before it was shut down. A onetime leading bidder was Racist McShootFace and username Tamir Rice was also used. There were apparently some potentially legitimate bids as high as $500,000 but who knows.

tl;dr- F*#k that guy, seriously.
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 07:52am PT
Major kudos to president Obama for standing up for transgender students in public schools:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-to-instruct-schools-to-accommodate-transgender-students/2016/05/12/0ed1c50e-18ab-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_transgender-1025pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

He's using his bully pulpit, power of the purse, and legal sticks.

I'm going to miss him.
pyro

Big Wall climber
Calabasas
May 13, 2016 - 07:57am PT
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/has-the-obama-administration-learned-anything-last-deportation-raids


I kinda like obama but nevermind..
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 08:04am PT
Dirt- Yeah a ballsy move. I heard a lawyer for some high school girls complaining about this sort of thing and how they don't feel comfortable changing in their locker room anymore but nobody seems to have brought up the fact that there are lesbians in those locker rooms right now.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 08:48am PT
If American high school girls weren't so fat maybe they wouldn't be so self-conscious.
The Swedish girls I showered with in a high school there were workin' it! And I don't
mean the flab. For 50 years Swedish high schools have only had one locker room.
That saves a ton of moolah, not to mention yer imagination.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 08:55am PT
Obama should be ashamed for having allowed this travesty to be foisted on us:


One more huge increase in medical costs ALL built around gubmint bureaucratic job security.
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 09:20am PT
Really you are on a roll this morning!
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 10:04am PT
Escopeta claims that "Big Government" is the reason for so much polarization but could it be that serious policy discussions are largely hampered by the gaping chasm in Republicans' perceived reality and objective truth?

President Obama's approval rating stands at 49/48, the first time we've had him with a positive approval spread in a considerable amount of time.

There continues to be a lot of misinformation about what has happened during Obama's time in office. 43% of voters think the unemployment rate has increased while Obama has been President, to only 49% who correctly recognize that it has decreased. And 32% of voters think the stock market has gone down during the Obama administration, to only 52% who correctly recognize that it has gone up.

In both cases Democrats and independents are correct in their understanding of how things have changed since Obama became President, but Republicans claim by a 64/27 spread that unemployment has increased and by a 57/27 spread that the stock market has gone down.


(nothing matters)
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 10:19am PT
Dirt, thank you. You know I actually hold Obama in high regard, generally, but this ICD-10
travesty is so beyond the pale words fail me, probably to yer relief. Kindly find me ONE
PROVIDER who has one good thing to say about it and I'll buy you a dinner for two at
Ruth's Chris, or the equivalent.

You've a week...
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 10:31am PT
Oh I thought you were hoping he would do something about the supertopo forum.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 10:33am PT
He's only the POTUS, not God.
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 10:34am PT
You're right, he's not that good.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 10:43am PT
dirt posted
You're right, he's not that good

My wall rack for a proper quote button!
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 10:44am PT
Leftovers, hell, if you found one willing to accept yer Faustian bargain to go as yer date
I aver you'd be picking up the tab if I got to cross-examine them!

The offer stands.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
May 13, 2016 - 10:50am PT
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
May 13, 2016 - 10:51am PT
President Obama's approval rating stands at 49/48, the first time we've had him with a positive approval spread in a considerable amount of time.

There continues to be a lot of misinformation about what has happened during Obama's time in office. 43% of voters think the unemployment rate has increased while Obama has been President, to only 49% who correctly recognize that it has decreased.

Some of that seeming misinformation is likely the result of a misunderstanding of what is technically defined as "unemployment" compared to "labor force participation rate."
Labor force participation has in fact substantially declined during Obama's term.
I think average Joe may have something more like labor force participation in mind rather than technical unemployment when he considers what's going on with people working.
If you rephrased the questions as to whether a higher or lower percentage of working-age Americans are actually working, which is probably the issue that most people really care about, then Average Joe would all of a sudden be right.
Most people probably don't know or care whether their unfortunate friend, neighbor, or relative who doesn't have a job is technically "unemployed" or is just out of the labor force for statistical purposes.

As for the stock market, if someone thinks that's (on average) lower now than when Obama took office, that's just incorrect and I have no explanation for it--certainly almost no one who actually owns stock would think that.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 10:54am PT
blahblah posted
Labor force participation has in fact substantially declined during Obama's term.

A trend that began in 2000 and includes people "looking for a job." It does not in fact include people who have "given up looking."

The civilian labor force participation rate is the number of employed and unemployed but looking for a job as a percentage of the population aged 16 years and over. This page provides the latest reported value for - United States Labor Force Participation Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news. United States Labor Force Participation Rate - actual data, historical chart and calendar of releases - was last updated on May of 2016.
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 10:59am PT
It does not in fact include people who have "given up looking."

Those are the Bernoises who are waiting for the Gravy Train.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
May 13, 2016 - 11:01am PT
Yeah, there's absolutely no reason why all these slackers can't borrow $20K from their parents and start a business.
Norton

Social climber
May 13, 2016 - 11:08am PT
or inherit 400 million dollars and claim to have hit a triple
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 11:32am PT
America in 2016 means being mad that "kids these days" don't "get off their asses" and take advantage of the massive government programs that encouraged infrastructure, housing and employment which existed when you were a kid that you killed because that "wasn't the government's role."
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
May 13, 2016 - 11:33am PT
Employment-Population Ratio



While the ratio has improved since bottoming in 2011, it's still historically low.
Norton

Social climber
May 13, 2016 - 11:39am PT
oh, so what exactly would you have done as President have done to "create" more good permanent jobs?

convince the House Republicans to spend any money on rebuilding infrastructure?

convince their them to spend money on "job training" or "making education affordable"?

let's hear what you would have done
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 11:42am PT
Repeal Obamacare! Clearly it is the culprit.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 11:43am PT

Also at record highs: number of pensioners from the largest generation in US history.


Norton posted
oh, so what exactly would you have done as President have done to "create" more good permanent jobs?

He would have worked with congress to pass a pro-business plan that would have made wealthy people rich enough to be willing to hire the rest of us to polish their mega yachts for $7.25/hr.
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
May 13, 2016 - 11:45am PT
Doesn't count those who've given up looking? What a stupid point. Duh!

It doesn't count those who got a job, either.

Jesus h christ can someone lend the President Obama haters some brain power?

DMT

I don't know about you, but I don't "look" for things that don't exist or that, even if they do exist, I almost certainly won't find.
But maybe you're right--maybe the declining labor force participation rate can be explained by the fact that Obama's done such a great job with the economy that lots of people don't even need to work anymore.
Damn I wish I was as smart as an Obama lover and could figure stuff like that out!
Reeotch

climber
4 Corners Area
May 13, 2016 - 12:03pm PT


The seasonally-adjusted SGS Alternate Unemployment Rate reflects current unemployment reporting methodology adjusted for SGS-estimated long-term discouraged workers, who were defined out of official existence in 1994. That estimate is added to the BLS estimate of U-6 unemployment, which includes short-term discouraged workers.
The U-3 unemployment rate is the monthly headline number. The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
The actual percentage of the population who is out of work is closer to 22%.
Norton

Social climber
May 13, 2016 - 12:33pm PT
Is there an important point trying to be brought out in this employment talk?

Is it that US Presidents really do have, without a cooperating congress, the constitutional authority to influence private sector hiring?

if so, how is a President supposed to do this, wave a magic wand?

or maybe the point is that the Federal government can't do much at all about employment, is that it

is so, that would be very much correct wouldn't it?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 13, 2016 - 01:29pm PT
I asked JE that question, and he went off on deregulation and lower taxes for the rich
according to him
The rich invest their extra money in wall street, and some how that creates millions of jobs like magic

and if things went so god damned regulated, there would be millions of extra jobs, just like magic

of course it never works, otherwise we would have very low unemployment
It's just a con to get the suckers to be OK with deregulating and lowering taxes on the rich


The real way to create jobs is either have the Government create them to do something like fix our infrastructure

or raise the minimum wage, that puts money in people's pockets, that they spend, which creates more demand, which creates jobs

Either way, President Obama has no control over what so ever, It's Congresses job to do this, but the Repubs in control have failed to do their job
and have also blocked all Democratic Proposals to create jobs or raise the minimum wage

deregulations and lowering the taxes on the rich actually creates higher unemployment

I guess they are too greedy to realize that a raising tide raises all boats, not just theirs

The high unemployment is 100% due to the Republican Party
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 01:35pm PT
if things went so god damned regulated, there would be millions of extra jobs, just like magic - of course it never works

Wow, gee, I somehow missed that Law of Economics. It must have been in
The Daily Worker's Annotated Guide to Karl Marx. And just when do any
regulations get rolled back? That isn't the way bureaucracy works - and
that IS a law. A Law of Life. We'll never know if less bureaucracy has
a beneficial effect because even if some benevolent Republican becomes
POTUS the sheer red tape of rescinding decades of idiotic regulations will
take decades to effect.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 13, 2016 - 01:45pm PT
My job depends on regulations

Relaxed Air Pollution Regulations = no job for Dr. F

I'm one of millions in the same boat.

so I'm not sure I believe what you say Reilly
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
May 13, 2016 - 02:12pm PT
My job depends on regulations

Relaxed Air Pollution Regulations = no job for Dr. F

Sucking on the public teet does have its drawbacks..
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 02:17pm PT
What a joke. Texas lieutenant governor Patrick opining on preaident Obama's decree regarding public school bathrooms:

"I believe it is the biggest issue facing families and schools in America since prayer was taken out of public schools," Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick declared Friday, mere hours after the Obama administration’s letter was released.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/obama-transgender-bathroom-students-title-ix-223170#ixzz48ZZq9rYB
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook[
Norton

Social climber
May 13, 2016 - 02:22pm PT
"I believe it is the biggest issue facing families and schools in America


wow, THE BIGGEST ISSUE = bathrooms

how do people so damn ignorant constantly get elected in Republican states

could it possibly be the voters?
dirtbag

climber
May 13, 2016 - 02:28pm PT
Well, most of the right wing bozos who are elected make no secret about their agendas, so the voters must like what they are proposing.
John M

climber
May 13, 2016 - 02:29pm PT
less.. more... neither works.

fair balanced well thought out regulations are what work. Regulations created for the good of the whole, not just a few. Whether that few be on the high end economically or on the low end.

we have had a few periods in history where principled men have thought up regulations. Then the self centered start tearing them down.

We need principled people in leadership.
blahblah

Gym climber
Boulder
May 13, 2016 - 02:44pm PT
Sucking on the public teet does have its drawbacks..

That's may be a little unfair to Craig Fry--things like environmental regulation are a good example of legitimate government regulation to prevent people from undertaking activity such as pollution that damages the public but for which the polluter otherwise would not pay.
Now things like setting minimum wages to interfere with the freedom of contract and thus to interfere with the efficient operation of markets--those are the types of regulations that need to be abolished.
Also, I agree that many of if not most government workers are "sucking on the public teat," but Fry's job at least may have some legitimacy, hard to say for sure without knowing more about what he does.
(Now even if his job is in some sense at least partially legitimate, he probably gets vastly more than he deserves in things like outrageous government pensions, not being an employee at will, etc., but that's a subject for another day.)
John M

climber
May 13, 2016 - 02:49pm PT
Now things like setting minimum wages to interfere with the freedom of contract and thus to interfere with the efficient operation of markets--those are the types of regulations that need to be abolished.

open markets do not work without proper regulations. Including setting minimum wage.

A free market only works with perfect knowledge. Perfect knowledge does not exist at this time. Without perfect knowledge you end up with time lags that hurts the weakest.

...

The people who need protection are the weakest. Minimum wage protects them from the bully pulpit of the powerful. "just go get another job" does not work for the weak.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
May 13, 2016 - 03:07pm PT
it that US Presidents really do have, without a cooperating congress, the constitutional authority to influence private sector hiring?

if so, how is a President supposed to do this, wave a magic wand?

I heard that Wall Street was going to create millions of jobs, but then the President hurt their feelings by calling them fat cats, so they decided to take their ball home instead...
Reilly

Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
May 13, 2016 - 03:10pm PT
DR F, while I might descend to the nether world of sarcasm on occasion my
post was pretty balanced and free of unfounded hyperbole. MANY studies
have been done by reputable economists on the effects of regulation on
businesses. Nobody, aside from a few nutters, begrudges doing their part
to maintain clean air and water but one of the basic tenets of bureaucracy
is that

If a little is good then more is better

This is where things get sticky. A quick example. When formaldehyde was
shown to be less than salubrious to yer health the bureaucrats went nuts.
It was a brave new world with unlimited opportunities for enhancing job
security, the Number One tenet of bureaucracy. A law was passed that said
that if you bought a sheet of plywood that had been made legally under
existing laws yet had more than X nanograms of formaldehyde in it you had
to keep record of who's house that piece of plywood went into! The really
stoopid part is that you only had to keep those records for 3 years IIRC.
Now who is gonna get cancer from a few sheets of plywood in their kitchen
cabinets in only 3 years? If you can't agree that that was the dumbest
phukking law ever passed then we've no hope.

We're definitely headed down the Road of Ruinous Bureaucracy that they have
in Europe. It takes a Frenchman at least 9 months to open a business
in France. That is a fact. That is why over 200,000 French have gone to
Britain to open business because it takes 3-4 days in Olde Blighty.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 04:11pm PT
Norton posted
Is there an important point trying to be brought out in this employment talk?

It's that Obama really is as bad as people want him to be. It's that the economy is secretly a shitshow but the Illuminati is hiding it from us. Also, a black man apparently controls the Illuminati now because that totally makes sense.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 13, 2016 - 06:44pm PT
Well you told me
Thanks

How about this question

What specific deregulations would create so many jobs that it will turn the economy around?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 13, 2016 - 07:12pm PT
Reilly posted

This is where things get sticky. A quick example. When formaldehyde was
shown to be less than salubrious to yer health the bureaucrats went nuts.
It was a brave new world with unlimited opportunities for enhancing job
security, the Number One tenet of bureaucracy. A law was passed that said
that if you bought a sheet of plywood that had been made legally under
existing laws yet had more than X nanograms of formaldehyde in it you had
to keep record of who's house that piece of plywood went into! The really
stoopid part is that you only had to keep those records for 3 years IIRC.
Now who is gonna get cancer from a few sheets of plywood in their kitchen
cabinets in only 3 years? If you can't agree that that was the dumbest
phukking law ever passed then we've no hope.

Formaldehyde is easily one of the biggest indoor pollutants. What the f*#k is wrong with you, dude? Europe has tighter regulations on most of this crap than America does. You can't feed your kid rice milk in Europe because they know the arsenic levels are absurdly high.
johnboy

Trad climber
Can't get here from there
May 13, 2016 - 09:01pm PT
Is there an important point trying to be brought out in this employment talk?

You just have to laugh when Republicans come out in public to say, our number one priority is to make sure the president fails. To hell with country or the unemployed, it's all Obama's fault


I remenber when Bush the 43rd said in a speech that he had created 800,000 jobs. A man from the audience yelled out, ya, I've got three of them.
Lorenzo

Trad climber
Portland Oregon
May 13, 2016 - 09:24pm PT
This is where things get sticky. A quick example. When formaldehyde was
shown to be less than salubrious to yer health the bureaucrats went nuts.
It was a brave new world with unlimited opportunities for enhancing job
security, the Number One tenet of bureaucracy. A law was passed that said
that if you bought a sheet of plywood that had been made legally under
existing laws yet had more than X nanograms of formaldehyde in it you had
to keep record of who's house that piece of plywood went into! The really
stoopid part is that you only had to keep those records for 3 years IIRC.
Now who is gonna get cancer from a few sheets of plywood in their kitchen
cabinets in only 3 years? If you can't agree that that was the dumbest
phukking law ever passed then we've no hope.

It actually makes perfect sense. People should know when a toxic product is put in their house. A three year database gives people time to check that a product was put in their house that at least met minimum standards. Some chineses floorings for example, were found to greatly exceed standards for formaldehyde content. Some people are quite sensitive ( including me)

It also makes perfect sense to stop keeping track with plywood after about three years because most of the volatile formaldehyde has off-gassed by then, of at least the levels are way lower. Plywood that old isn't all that toxic. Most of the off gassing happens in the first year.
That isn't the case with all products.
There are products made with a LOT more formaldehyde glues (some OSB, Carpet, melamine, and veneer flooring). Some of those are being taken off the market. There are formaldehyde alternatives for most products, including carpets, flooring, and cabinets. Use those.

https://www.cpsc.gov/PageFiles/121919/AN%20UPDATE%20ON%20FORMALDEHYDE%20final%200113.pdf

http://www.testittoday.com/product/chinese-flooring/
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 14, 2016 - 07:00am PT
Sure, we all hate regulations

But hating them is one thing, claiming they are killing jobs is completely different, and is the claim the people on the right are making.

The Dems claim spending creates jobs.
And all we have heard over the last eight years is that Obama has failed, and we need to go back to Reaganomics (which we really never left) to get the economy booming again.

So please tell us your claims of knowing how economics works will turn the economy around and create jobs

Please tell us specifically what deregulations will create the amount of jobs that will turn the economy around.

and

Please tell us how lowering taxes on the rich creates the amount of jobs that will turn around the economy.

I anxiously await your responses.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 15, 2016 - 06:09am PT
I would argue that the majority of the time the problem isn't regulation but the inefficient implementation of them. When I lived in Arizona, reregistering your car was as easy as plugging in your credit card on the DOT website. I moved back to New Hampshire and all of a sudden I'm having to stand in line at the DMV 45 minutes away and then having to go to my town hall on top of that where they also, it turns out, don't take credit cards. So then I have to go get cash and come back to pay the damn thing. Unfortunately, in the name of "government efficiency" (which is often really just anti-regulatory malice) we tend to starve our regulatory agencies so that they can't get things done quickly even if they wanted to. For instance, the SEC is woefully undermanned to actually regulate the financial sector and inspectors of nearly all types rarely have the time to make it to a given site more often than once every couple years. Interagency conflicts don't help either.

If Democrats want to make the argument that government intervention is worthwhile (which I think is the best of the possible bad answers a lot of the time) they owe it to America to make these agencies more efficient and customer service oriented. The overhauls at the IRS at number of years back were a good start but we can do better.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 15, 2016 - 06:31am PT
By all means, the fleecing should be efficient and painless. Perhaps they could install soma vending machines at the DMV if you are unable to quickly and easily submit your information and ducketts online.

I wonder what would happen if all spurious regulation/fees/licensing as well as annual tax payments be mandated to be completed in-person so that people really get to feel the bern properly.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 15, 2016 - 02:44pm PT
...he whined on his government invented internet. Escopeta you are that perfect example of a libertarian. Enjoying all the privilege, complaining about the costs while others bear the real burden.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
May 15, 2016 - 03:10pm PT
Libertarian logic

Paying for services = fleecing
taxes = theft

Gov. = thanks for taking all my freedoms away

as he types away freely on the internet in the safety of American privilege

Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 15, 2016 - 03:18pm PT
What burden are you carrying? Oh, right.... I forgot.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
May 15, 2016 - 05:49pm PT
And lives in a state that basically only survives on taxes paid by other states and has one of the lowest state GDPs per capita, but a real exception-to-the-rule contributor no doubt. Basically, libertarians are semi-organized freeloaders hiding behind about a dozen differing spews all of which are basically bullsh#t.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 15, 2016 - 07:07pm PT
Nothing that a few more license and regulatory fee schemes can't fix I'm sure.....
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 16, 2016 - 05:11am PT
IF they raise the DMV fees even higher in CA, maybe they could create more jobs? That would be good right?
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 16, 2016 - 05:51am PT
What burden are you carrying? Oh, right.... I forgot.

Hahahahahaha, get it? Racism is hilarious!



Again, it's very freeing to stop apologizing for racism. You've already acknowledged aspects of your own privilege, you were literally bragging about it. Step into the light, Escopeta! It might cost you some of your victimhood but that will make you a far, far more interesting person I promise.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 16, 2016 - 07:02am PT
Pass
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 16, 2016 - 07:07am PT
Victimhood is a powerful drug. I can't say I blame you.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 16, 2016 - 07:25am PT
Especially with so many people ready to carry my burden for me. Thanks for picking that up. You're doing yeomans work there and should be recognized.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - May 16, 2016 - 08:11am PT
Thanks!
NutAgain!

Trad climber
South Pasadena, CA
May 17, 2016 - 04:52pm PT
Dude, take a look at the reasonable words coming from The Pope and compare it with the level to which U.S. Republicans have degenerated:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/17/pope-francis-islam-christianity-share-idea-of-conquest-sadiq-khan


How do these words reconcile with the position of leading Republican presidential candidates? Does the Republican party still have the support of those who identify themselves as Christian? Maybe those people should instead vote for Bernie Sanders. He certainly holds a lot more Jesus-like positions than any of the Republican candidates.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
May 18, 2016 - 01:51pm PT
My wife and I just returned from a week as tourons in Arizona - Route 66, Grand Canyon, Sedona, et al. Did I miss anything?

John
dirtbag

climber
May 18, 2016 - 01:56pm PT
No! I will probably be unplugged for much of August and September. It will probably be good for me not to follow what Donald fookin trump says
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
May 18, 2016 - 02:11pm PT
I rebel, like most, at gov't inefficiency. However, I remain very impressed that neither party, when in power, seems to have a significant effect on making things better.

Inefficiency does translate into money spent, which perks up the economy. Simply shutting things down, like military bases and weapons programs, would result in economic slowing, which is poison for any politician.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
May 18, 2016 - 03:09pm PT
I remain very impressed that neither party, when in power, seems to have a significant effect on making things better.

Ken, the old joke is that Republicans allege that government can't work, and proceed to try to prove it when they get in power. While I have often contended that Democrats make better bureaucrats than Republicans, because Democrats are willing to stay in those positions for a lifetime, so they have more experience, the last seven years make me wonder. I find this particularly true as I watch the CFPB's regulations under Dodd-Frank. If anyone there has any clue how their regulations affect debtor-creditor relations and how they help or hurt the economy, the evidence is quite weak.


Your comments on government spending need a small qualification. The stimulative effect of spending depends on the type of spending and the method of financing it. If we take money from the private sector and have the government spend it instead, it may or may not be stimulative, depending on where it's spent. If spent on public goods (meaning goods and services that have social utility, but have no effective means of exclusion), they can actually prove stimulative, even if that leaves less money in private hands. If, instead, they just amount to pure transfer payments, there is a noticeable lack of statistically significant stimulative effect.

When financed by deficit spending, the short-term effect of government expenditures is almost always stimulative, regardless of how it's spent - provided it isn't spent to slow down the private sector (see discussion of Dodd-Frank, above, or alternatively, EPA regulations, etc.) The longer term effect (i.e. more than two years) depends, however. Deficits can mean stimulus, or they can mean inflation, depending on the growth in demand and in the money supply. I still see inflation as the only practical way out of our deficits of the last 15 years, but demand needs to grow for the growth in the money supply to result in inflation. Without a growth in investment, real demand won't grow, as the disappointing recovery demonstrates.

Sad to say, the Democrats and Republicans haven't figured out how to stimulate investment. In addition, the Democrats haven't figured out investment's importance, and the Republicans haven't figured out how to explain its importance - and the limits of governmental interferance, but then who's perfect? That imperfection gives us something to talk about.

John

John M

climber
May 18, 2016 - 03:52pm PT
because Democrats are willing to stay in those positions for a lifetime,

uh..

just can't help yourself.. can you.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
May 18, 2016 - 04:46pm PT
the evidence is quite weak

The evidence is to the contrary in point of fact.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
May 18, 2016 - 08:05pm PT
Republicans haven't ever figured out how to demonstrate its importance

Fixed that for you...
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
May 19, 2016 - 11:26am PT
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-oklahoma-abortion-20160519-snap-story.html

Any doctor who performs an abortion in Oklahoma could be charged with a felony and punished with up to three years in prison under a bill that the Legislature passed Thursday.

The measure is the first of its kind in the nation, according to abortion rights group Center for Reproductive Rights. The bill also would forbid any physician who performs an abortion from obtaining or renewing a license to practice medicine in Oklahoma.

With no discussion or debate, the Senate voted, 33-12, Thursday for the bill by proposed by Republican Sen. Nathan Dahm of Broken Arrow. A handful of Republicans joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, which now heads to Republican Gov. Mary Fallin, an abortion rights opponent. Fallin spokesman Michael McNutt said the governor would withhold comment about the bill until her staff has time to review it.

"Since I believe life begins at conception, it should be protected, and I believe it's a core function of state government to defend that life from the beginning of conception," said Dahm.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
May 19, 2016 - 01:24pm PT
Republicans haven't ever figured out how to demonstrate its importance

The econometric literature has done that already. Now if you mean demonstrating how an invgestment tax credit (a favorite of Democrats) improves employment, you have a fair point. The issue is explaining some of the driest reading on earth. Near the end of my second year of grad school in economics, where my main empahsis was econometrics and industrial organization, my industrial organization prof assigned a couple hundred pages of the law school's antitrust casebook for "light reading for the weekend."

Compared with, say, 40 pages of econometrics equations dealing with determining realistic statistics of fit when your data defy all standard assumptions of statistical inference, 200 pages of antitrust opinions really was light reading. That, more than anything else, caused my educational and career switch to the law.

John
High Fructose Corn Spirit

Gym climber
May 22, 2016 - 08:28am PT
So here's a FOX piece that's informative, poignant. I'm wondering if by posting it
my standing as a liberal left is diminished any among my brethren?

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBQDjmXrBQo


btw, here's the winning drawing of Muhammad in that Texas contest...


I think it's pretty good - artsy-wise and message-wise.

Others may disgree?

Are we all for free speech?

"That's why I draw you." :)

Remember,

There are millions of liberal muslims and ex-muslims around the world who are trying to free themselves from their conservative / islamist communities many of which are led by the likes of this Choudry.

Liberals and leftists who avoid criticism of Islam (so as not to hurt / insult / "hate on" Muslims) do not help their cause.

We must (learn to) distinguish between (a) criticism of Islam (dogma, doctrine thereof) and (b) attacks and bigotry directed against Muslim people.

...

I was directed to review this piece, this cartoon and its winner by this terrific exchange between Gad Saad and Robert Spencer...

[Click to View YouTube Video]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7zpH4xt5rA
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2016 - 08:51am PT
After that my guess is that you will never hear from him again. The greatest trick the Bern ever pulled was convincing the world he mattered.

And like that…

he's gone.

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2016 - 08:57am PT
The U.S. Supreme Court split 4-4 Thursday over a challenge to President Obama's immigration policy, a result that prevents the administration from putting the program into effect during the rest of his term.
dirtbag

climber
Jun 23, 2016 - 09:21am PT
It's been a very big news day, Edward.

In addition, the Brexit vote is happening.
Norton

Social climber
Jun 23, 2016 - 09:21am PT
The Obama Administration has now deported over 2.5 million illegals back to their countries. In fact for the first time in history more Mexicans have left the US than entered and stayed.

A conservative's wet dream, no one gonna take that lawn mowing job away from them

In other news, the Supreme Court has upheld the Affirmative action college admissions program.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jun 23, 2016 - 09:25am PT
After that my guess is that you will never hear from him again. The greatest trick the Bern ever pulled was convincing the world he mattered.

And like that…

he's gone.

Right, he's gone.

Sanders had been the longest-serving independent in U.S. congressional history...
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2016 - 09:50am PT
Seven and a half years in the Senate. Sponsored one noteworthy bill that became law.

Talk of revolution is great. But results are what really matter.
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jun 23, 2016 - 10:39am PT
Ding Dong the Socialist is dead
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jun 23, 2016 - 10:42am PT
A conservative's wet dream

I would re-write that as a nativist's wet dream, but too many of them pruport to be conservative (see, e.g., Trump, Donald or the Heritage Foundation).

The nativists like to put down Mexico, but its improving economy - and the U.S.'s anemic recovery - made crossing our southern border less economically advantageous.

John
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2016 - 10:58am PT
In fact for the first time in history more Mexicans have left the US than entered and stayed.

Thank you for last year's news.
Brandon-

climber
The Granite State.
Jun 23, 2016 - 11:02am PT
Cite this year's news, then.
Larry Nelson

Social climber
Jun 23, 2016 - 11:41am PT
JEleazarian posted
...made crossing our southern border less economically advantageous.

Seems like the law of supply and demand works with illegal labor as well.
That is why calls for mass deportation are so inane.
Just go after the employers and you don't step on human dignity with gestapo teams checking papers.
10b4me

Mountain climber
Retired
Jun 23, 2016 - 11:51am PT
Just go after the employers

conveniently, trump doesn't suggest this.
Norton

Social climber
Jul 10, 2016 - 07:25pm PT
here you go, Cosmic
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 10, 2016 - 07:29pm PT
Thanks, Norton!

OK....let's get back at it. How stooopid is Donald? Or Hillary?

Edit: Sssshhhh, everybody....don't tell couch about the 'Politapocalypse: RIP?' thread that I just nuked. That kind of stuff just isn't necessary.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jul 10, 2016 - 07:38pm PT
Well,stupid,dishonest,greedy,self serving is all you have left.

A Shame really.

You could have went with someone honest.


Edit; Phuck You in advance
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 10, 2016 - 07:43pm PT
Dude looks like he's about to have a stroke.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jul 10, 2016 - 07:58pm PT
I hope Bernie doesn't have a stroke before he joins Hillary's rally on Tuesday (where he's endorsing her, wilbeer. Take the advice of an honest man).
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jul 10, 2016 - 08:33pm PT
I would if people like you were not on her payroll.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 10, 2016 - 09:14pm PT
Smell the coffee, Berners...the only thing that can prevent TrumpPocalypse is Hillary.
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jul 10, 2016 - 11:22pm PT
I don't know. I hear Trump will withdraw for $150 million.
couchmaster

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 09:02am PT

Somebody told. There was nothing on that thread to speak of Apogee: http://www.supertopo.com/climbing/thread.php?topic_id=2842384&msg=2842400#msg2842400

Shhhhh:
"Sssshhhh, everybody....don't tell couch about the 'Politapocalypse: RIP?' thread that I just nuked. That kind of stuff just isn't necessary. "

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 11, 2016 - 09:08am PT
GFC - Thanks for the Serena post.

Made my morning.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 11, 2016 - 10:23am PT
Exactly my thoughts, couch. What's the point, then?
skcreidc

Social climber
SD, CA
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:08am PT
I would if people like you were not on her payroll.

Boy, wilbeer, you need to get off that bus to Soreloserville.

Lol! Crankster does come across as a "plant" doesn't he. He's very politically astute, never really discussing (on rare occasion) particular points, and usually sticking to the "party line". Wilbeer, I suspect he know's you're not on that particular bus but admitting it would lend credence to (our) your position.

I'd be shocked if the lot of you really cannot understand why so many people are pissed off about the status quo (and I am not talking about the racists who are pissed off), and that to a certain degree a vote for Hillary is a vote for the status quo.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:16am PT
Of course I realize the frustration people have in Establishment politics...though Donald's an ultimate slimebag, I get the part about his appeal due to his supposed 'anti-establishment' character.

There's ideal, then there's real. We have a two Party system, and these are the candidates in front of us....one is going to be in the WH. The practical reality of that fact makes a Hillary choice pretty damn easy.
Norton

Social climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:21am PT
so, what exactly is the "status quo"?

I assume it is a vague term for business as usual in Washington

and much much much of the time congress does nothing at all to benefit the citizens

they vote and pass the same legislation every year, fund the military, etc

government spending is some 20% of the US economy

so what is the problem with Status Quo?

congress is not passing enough legislation to benefit the middle class, is that is?

what do you want that you are not getting from the Status Quo?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:31am PT
Like not voting for Hillary is going to change anything to "Not status quo"

It's just a misunderstanding of how politics works

you want to get out of the status quo, you need to do a lot more work than just voting for a President

You need a movement with a President and Congress in session that want change to do squat

If Jill Stein was elected do you really think the status quo will change?
It won't...
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:33am PT
This is scary -- Ginsburg just gave me a reason to vote for Trump. She says if he wins, it's time to move to New Zealand. While that's an insufficient reason to vote for an egomaniacal disaster-in-the-making, getting Ginsburg off the court would not be a bad thing.

;-)

John
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:38am PT
you want to get out of the status quo, you need to do a lot more work than just voting for a President

You need a movement with a President and Congress in session that want change to do squat

Something like Occupy Wall Street.

Except well thought out and effective.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 11, 2016 - 11:43am PT
15 Dodging, Weaving and Smear Tactics Used by Republicans
This is how George W. Bush survived eight years of non-stop scandals.

http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/15-smear-tactics-used-republicans
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:00pm PT
For all the Bernie holdouts:

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/07/dont_love_hillary_fine_but_vote_for_her_anyway_mor.html#incart_2box_opinion
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:05pm PT
And another:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/both-are-unpopular-only-one-is-a-threat/2016/07/10/4d78dce8-4529-11e6-bc99-7d269f8719b1_story.html
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:26pm PT
We have a two Party system...

I'm voting for Gloria La Riva. She was just arrested in Baton Rouge. I like political leaders who get busted because of their politics.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:30pm PT
Gary, Hillary almost got busted. Isn't that enough for you?

:-)
the Fet

climber
Tu-Tok-A-Nu-La
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:31pm PT
Again I urge everyone not in swing state to vote for Jill Stein, Green Party, or Gary Johnson, Libertarian. Show support for moving from a two party system.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 11, 2016 - 12:57pm PT
Our system is screwed up. Both sides are corrupt. The GOP is controlled by corporations and the far right. The Dems seem to be closer to their roots, but they're still bought and paid for by big business. It's nearly impossible for moderates to reach across the aisle and then still get re-elected.

What's it gonna take for real change to occur? Someone like Sanders in the WH? Even if he got elected, he'd face a do-nothing Congress.

What can be done? Term limits. An amendment for campaign finance? Scrap the electoral system? The only time that comes up is when there's a sore loser.

How about we start over? Go with something similar to France's?
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 11, 2016 - 01:13pm PT
EdwardT, some science fiction writer, I suspect Heinlein, thought a lottery would be the way to go.

His thinking was that anyone who WANTED to be president, for instance, couldn't be trusted with that much power. Hence, a lottery instead of elections for any political office. Everyone would have to enter, no exceptions. If you won the lottery, you had to serve.

You'd definitely have a more representative legislature than what we have now. Most members of congress are millioniares.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 11, 2016 - 01:24pm PT
"Show support for moving from a two party system."

This is a really rotten time to be making such a statement.


Edit:
"Someone like Sanders in the WH?"

Anyone who thinks that any candidate (Stein, Sanders, whatever) could get into the WH without beholding to some kind of special interest $$ ('Establishment') needs to get their head examined, learn about the political process, or both.

"What can be done?"

It's about the $$. Take the $$ out of the process, and change will probably start to happen.
TradEddie

Trad climber
Philadelphia, PA
Jul 11, 2016 - 02:32pm PT
you know, a lot of people do not realize just what the Libertarian Party stands for

It stands for legalizing pot, right dude? Few, even the "Libertarians" on this site have thought through the rest of the LP platform. I bet the armchair libertarians would be up in arms (newly legalized fully automatic arms) if the LP came to power and privatized Yosemite or Yellowstone, or for that matter, sold off the public road to their home.

TE
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 11, 2016 - 03:05pm PT
This is scary -- Ginsburg just gave me a reason to vote for Trump. She says if he wins, it's time to move to New Zealand. While that's an insufficient reason to vote for an egomaniacal disaster-in-the-making, getting Ginsburg off the court would not be a bad thing.

John, I'm not clear on your reasoning. How does a vote, or even the election, of Trump do anything towards getting Ginsburg off the court?

I would think that she would rebel at the thought of him replacing her, and stay out of spite.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 11, 2016 - 03:10pm PT
“I can’t imagine what this place would be ― I can’t imagine what the country would be ― with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be ― I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

I think she is the best SCOTUS on the court, and agree with her,
so just another thing me and John disagree on.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 11, 2016 - 03:53pm PT
From Dirt's link:

One of my best friends tells me he will not vote this year. He hates Hillary Clinton, and he hates Donald Trump even more.

"I hope to be in the woods hunting," he tells me.

This election is close enough for me to lose sleep, so part of me wants to strangle him. The outcome could hinge on how millions of people like him sort through their competing dislikes.

I get where he's coming from. Pulling the lever this November will bring no joy to me.

But I keep thinking about the mopes on the left who voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 because they couldn't stand Al Gore.

That tipped the outcome in Florida, handing the presidency to George W. Bush, who gave us the Iraq war, tax cuts for the rich, and a return of massive deficits. Thanks, Ralph.

I think about the Bernie Sanders supporter I spoke to when Clinton came to Newark in June. He said he'd never vote for her, even against Trump.

"She's just the lesser of two evils," he said.

Well, yeah. But isn't that better than the greater of two evils?
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 11, 2016 - 03:55pm PT
I think she is the best SCOTUS on the court, and agree with her,
so just another thing me and John disagree on.

Actually, I agree with John in the inappropriateness of the COMMENT. It gives the impression that she could not be impartial in some cases, and that is not good for our Justices.

I disagree with his solution.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jul 11, 2016 - 04:27pm PT
You folks are worried over nothing.

The closest Trump is going to get to the WH is being jockeyed by on the beltway.

It is going to be fun mocking you part time liberals for 4-8 years.

She is going to show us all the way.

To Syria,maybe even N. Korea.More Fracking.

You think there is discontent in this country right now,get used to it.

Let's see how fast she strays from her own parties platform.


Paid troll response herevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvlol.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 11, 2016 - 04:38pm PT
One of my best friends tells me he will not vote this year.

Good. That means my vote counts even more.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 05:24pm PT
It is going to be fun mocking you part time liberals for 4-8 years.

Well, look who is playing the purity card.

I guess your poop don't stink!
wilbeer

Mountain climber
Terence Wilson greeneck alleghenys,ny,
Jul 11, 2016 - 06:26pm PT
"Hillary actually represents the democratic party."

Yep,exactly .lol.

http://uspolitics24.com/1340-2/


Righteous indeed DB,I will remind everyone of you ,You will not have berners to blame either.


edit ;Have to say"Both are unpopular,only one is a threat"

Best slogan yet no doubt.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 11, 2016 - 06:42pm PT

Member profile information for Klimmer is shown below. This member's account has been deactivated.

What happened?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 11, 2016 - 07:40pm PT
I didn't know I was in such danger from those OTHERS that want to oppress me!!!
I thought all these years that being a Straight Hetero, White Male, Chistin that I was especially privileged and not really oppressed at all compared to the others, but I was sooo wrong..!!


Savage: 'Straight, Heterosexual, White, Male, Christian' Is The 'Most Oppressed Member Of Society'

7/11/16 @ 2:55pm
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/


Last week, talk radio host Michael Savage continued his attacks on former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson for filing a sexual harassment lawsuit against Roger Ailes, the network’s CEO.

He compared defendants in sexual harassment lawsuits to the dissidents who have been persecuted in communist countries like North Korea and mocked “the myth” of “the poor, downtrodden woman” in America.

“What’s this nonsense about ‘oppressed this, oppressed that’?” Savage said on his program on Wednesday. “The most oppressed member of society, as I’ve said before and I’m willing to stand by this again: The most ridiculed, the most oppressed member of society today is the straight, heterosexual, white, male Christian. Period.”


Which right wing media talking head isn't a complete lying tool?
They all spew 99% BS.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 07:44pm PT
Savage is a racist idiot.

apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 11, 2016 - 07:48pm PT
"Member profile information for Klimmer is shown below. This member's account has been deactivated."

Wow. Just wow.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 11, 2016 - 07:48pm PT
vvv
No

apparently a purge of some sort has been going on
dirtbag

climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 07:57pm PT
It is possible he asked to be nuked.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jul 11, 2016 - 08:08pm PT
Not the work of a mere mortal, only G-d could nuke Klimmer the Klown
Norton

Social climber
Jul 11, 2016 - 08:30pm PT
don't know but perhaps he was seen as excessively polarizing ...eliciting inappropriate responses.....
Skeptimistic

Mountain climber
La Mancha
Jul 11, 2016 - 08:49pm PT
I doubt the polarizing angle, because just about everyone on the OT politard threads would be nuked too. I don't think he bailed on his own because he'll want to let us know how righteous he is when Trump-god wins.

Wish C-mac would give us a clue.
Ken M

Mountain climber
Los Angeles, Ca
Jul 11, 2016 - 08:56pm PT
Klimmer was a simple troll, throwing incendiary comments just to offend people and outrage them.

He happened to take the conservative side, but I'd say the same about a liberal. ANY troll damages a site and a discussion.

There is nothing wrong about expressing the conservative viewpoint, and I've actually learned a lot from John E's thoughtful posts, and wish there were more.
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 12, 2016 - 05:43am PT
Sanders expected to endorse Clinton today in Portsmouth, NH. There's a good interview with her on Ezra Klein's podcast just released today: http://podbay.fm/show/1081584611
Winemaker

Sport climber
Yakima, WA
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:24am PT
Nah, Klimmer isn't (wasn't) a troll, he's the real deal. Just go to the 'Massive Ark on the Moon' thread for verification of his obsession(s) and serial posting. All his stuff is still there, but he's missing from the Donald thread.

Curious about what happened. He sure was a persistent bugger.
Norton

Social climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:32am PT
well, you guys seem certain that klimmer was a troll

a troll is an intentionally obnoxious, confrontational disrupting s.o.b.

I don't see klimmer that way, rather it was clear he was absolutely rigid about his literal bible certainty

and from that came his problem with a woman running for US President

he wasn't a troll, but he was bullheaded as hell

Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:48am PT
Dallas Shooting thread locked down

It seems when the right wingers go down the rabbit hole of crazy, the thread gets locked down to stop the insanity

just look at what those gun nutz where posting
I would lock it down as well

there's no hope for a sensible discussion with gun nutz
bible thumpers, or right wing extremists
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:57am PT
Spam thread
QITNL

climber

Jul 11, 2016 - 10:52pm PT
Hey mods -

Perhaps you could discard the Dallas Shooting thread.

http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/2841065/Dallas-Shooting

It has devolved into a bunch of dudes harping on "black thugs." It's getting kinda racist.

I was speaking tonight with a buddy who was almost caught in the crossfire. Want to show him some respect.

I wish I could post more pictures, but my work precludes it. I can't be associated with this stuff and all the gun talk.

Just here for the climbing. It's summer. Thanks.

If you haven't checked it out, you should just to see what these gun nutz post, I was pillared for trying to reason with them on BLM.
Jon Beck

Trad climber
Oceanside
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:59am PT
In 2008, before Obama became savy (politically correct) about what to say he uttered this gem, Hillary joined the right wing in criticizing him:

"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said.
The comments were posted Friday on The Huffington Post, creating a wave of criticism from Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. John McCain, and other politicians as the April 22 Pennsylvania primary draws near.
"The people of faith I know don't ?cling to' religion because they're bitter. People embrace faith not because they are materially poor, but because they are spiritually rich," Clinton said at a rally in Indianapolis.

http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2008/april/obama-they-cling-to-guns-or-religion.html
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 12, 2016 - 08:29am PT
Dallas Shooting thread locked down

It seems when the right wingers go down the rabbit hole of crazy, the thread gets locked down to stop the insanity

just look at what those gun nutz where posting
I would lock it down as well

there's no hope for a sensible discussion with gun nutz
bible thumpers, or right wing extremists

Part of the problem with race relations in this country is the inability to honestly criticize African Americans. Doing so often gets the speaker labelled a narrow-minded, ignorant bigot. And the lines remain drawn.
crankster

Trad climber
No. Tahoe
Jul 12, 2016 - 08:33am PT
<groan> ^^^

Meanwhile...
The Associated Press @AP 1m1 minute ago

Bernie Sanders endorses Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee for president.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 08:45am PT
Has the Donald thread been locked too?
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 12, 2016 - 08:56am PT
Do you have proof that there aren't as many whites killing whites as you claim about the black killing blacks

add up all the:

husbands killing their wife's lover
wives killing their husband out of self defense
tots shooting tots
white suicide
white killing blacks
white Christian terrorists
white militia deaths
white inner city crime, drugs, gangs

and then compare that number to the BS you post about

When we start to Honestly criticize white on white Crime and killings!!!
When will it start????
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 12, 2016 - 09:00am PT
Has the Donald thread been locked too?

A little ST housecleaning.
Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 12, 2016 - 09:32am PT
Republican Platform

1st issue, make Pornography illegal

Republican delegates unanimously adopted an amendment to their draft platform Monday morning that called pornography “a public health crisis” and a “public menace” that is destroying lives.

“Pornography, with his harmful effects, especially on children, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the life of millions. We encourage states to continue to fight this public menace and pledge our commitment to children’s safety and well being,” the amendment stated.

Reince Pribus

also on their Platform:
bash the gays
keep the coloreds out
keep women barefoot and pregnant
police bathrooms for transgenders
keep wages low
keep job insecurity high
start a new war with the axis of evil
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 12, 2016 - 09:36am PT
"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said.

He was spot on.
apogee

climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
Jul 12, 2016 - 10:29am PT
Yes, he was. I'm gonna miss the guy.

Hopefully Hillary will speak as directly.
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:18am PT
More goodies about Trump.

http://https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/donald-trump-has-history-cheating-workers-out-money-just-ask-his-golf-clubhouse-architect/

Scumbag.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:24am PT

Having represented numerous parties in construction dispuates over the last 38 years, I've run across my share of people whose idea of good business is to stiff those who provide goods or services to their projects. It combines two vile characteristics: dishonesty and stupdity. I find this history of stiffing subs almost as troubling as his mercantilist trade position. Either one should disqualify one from becoming our President.

John
dirtbag

climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:25am PT
This too, John:


Craig Fry

Trad climber
So Cal.
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:34am PT
A majority of Republicans think Trump is well qualified to be President
and will actually make America Great again

It's their hope that he will fix all their problems with his mighty bluster
Hope and Change

so you can't trust Republicans when it comes to judging character
Norton

Social climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:37am PT
with nothing else left

let us hope this thread does not get locked down
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:52am PT
QITNL

climber

Jul 11, 2016 - 10:52pm PT
Hey mods -

Perhaps you could discard the Dallas Shooting thread.

http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/2841065/Dallas-Shooting

It has devolved into a bunch of dudes harping on "black thugs." It's getting kinda racist.

I was speaking tonight with a buddy who was almost caught in the crossfire. Want to show him some respect.

I wish I could post more pictures, but my work precludes it. I can't be associated with this stuff and all the gun talk.

Just here for the climbing. It's summer. Thanks.


Does this person include an address to send additional binkys?
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:57am PT
To change the subject slightly, the following appeared in today's "Notable & Quotable" column on the Wall Street Journal's Opinion pages:

"From remarks by Gary Johnson and William Weld, the Libertarian Party cadidates for president and vice president, during an interview at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on July 7 with Thomas Burr, the club's president:

Thomas Burr: So following on that, Governor, 10 percent doesn't get you elected president. So do you worry about being perceived as a spoiler to the major party candidates such as Ross Perot in '92 or Ralph Nader in 2000?

Gary Johnson: I will lose no sleep if that is the label given to me, and I will reiterate; this is a party that needs crashing.

William Weld: What's to spoil?

Mr. Johnson: What's to spoil? (Applause) . . .

Mr. Burr: Governor Johnson, we've had several questions submitted about this, so I'm just going to ask it. When was the last time you smoked or ingested marijuana?

Mr. Johnson: I did this about two months ago, it's been about two months. And when you tell the truth, really, you don't have anything to fear. I've always maintained that you should not be on the job impaired. Well, as of two months ago, really this is a 24/7 job running for president of the United States. And as president of the United States, that also is a 24/7 job. So in my lifetime, I think I have more than demonstrated my ability to be self disciplined. I haven't had a drink of alcohol in 29 years. I wasn't an alcoholic, it had everything to do with rock climbing and the immediacy of rock climbing and being the best you could possibly be. But this is the truth component that I think is really also lacking in politics.

Who would know that I ingested marijuana products two months ago? My best friends and if I'd have said, 'Hey, I don't use it, or I haven't used them,' my best friends would consider me a hypocrite. And I think hypocrisy is the one unforgivable in life. Doing one thing and saying another. (Applause)

Mr. Burr: Just to clarify, are you saying that if elected president, you would not ingest or smoke marijuana as president?

Mr. Johnson: That is correct, yes."

[Emphasis supplied.]

I wish we could elicit that level of candor from all the candidates.

John

EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 12, 2016 - 11:58am PT
Careful Escopeta.

Klimmer is gone.

The Dallas Shooting thread got shut down... possibly over language as harsh as "black thugs".
Norton

Social climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:07pm PT
Donald Trump Said Hillary Clinton Would ‘Make a Good President’ in 2008

Donald Trump is attacking Hillary Clinton these days, but eight years ago, in the midst of the 2008 Democratic primary race, he said she would “make a good president” and a lot of people thought pairing her with Barack Obama would be a “dream ticket.”

His kind words for Mrs. Clinton came in a previously unreported clip from “Trumped!,” a syndicated radio feature that aired from 2004 to 2008 and consisted of a daily commentary of about 60 seconds from the real-estate mogul.

http://www.wsj.com/article_email/donald-trump-said-hillary-clinton-would-make-a-good-president-in-2008-1468281714-lMyQjAxMTI2NzEyMjQxMzI3Wj
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:09pm PT
I don't care where you exist, its bad form to whine to internet moderators. Sissy pants
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:11pm PT
I don't care where you exist, its bad form to whine to internet moderators. Sissy pants

Yeah, if harmless Intertard bantering gets your panties all bunched up, turn off the computer.
WBraun

climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:16pm PT
This thread should be LOCKED too .....
Escopeta

Trad climber
Idaho
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:23pm PT
^^^^ You should be locked. You lie and when you admit to all of us that you've been lying you will have to apologize for all the lies that you and your party have made. Lol
Norton

Social climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:42pm PT
it could not be simpler could it, Craig

don't like that people are posting to a thread you don't like? then don't click or reply to it

grease monkey works very well too, don't have to read any particular person's posts
WBraun

climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 12:46pm PT
You don't get it at all ever!

Admin does not like these threads!

They are locking them because they feel they are inappropriate for this forum .......
EdwardT

Trad climber
Retired
Jul 12, 2016 - 01:23pm PT
Funny

NSFW language

America: The Greatest Country on Earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RX1GhVio4no
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Jul 12, 2016 - 01:36pm PT
Thanks, Edwart T. That is funny.

John
August West

Trad climber
Where the wind blows strange
Jul 12, 2016 - 02:29pm PT
A majority of Republicans think Trump is well qualified to be President
and will actually make America Great again

I'm not so sure about that. Trump has a very strong core of support which was around 30%~45% of Republican primary voters. I don't think a majority of Republicans are happy with Trump. Trump's negatives are off the chart even among Republicans.

Now a majority of Republicans probably think Trump is the lessor evil vis a vis Hillary.
Norton

Social climber
Jul 12, 2016 - 02:35pm PT
well guys....

better say all those complicated political things pretty quick

because the admins are gonna nuke this thread like they did the Donald and Hillary ones

any time now, wait for IT
HighDesertDJ

Trad climber
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 12, 2016 - 02:40pm PT
Werner posted
You don't get it at all ever!

Admin does not like these threads!

They are locking them because they feel they are inappropriate for this forum .......

YOU don't get it, Werner. They don't like that people get all personal and call each other stupid which is roughly 95% of your contribution to political threads.
Gary

Social climber
Where in the hell is Major Kong?
Jul 12, 2016 - 07:20pm PT
Holy cow. I agree with most of a Jonah Goldberg column. Will wonders never cease! This, for example:

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (who did not lose his lazy certainty) spent the weekend attacking the Black Lives Matter movement as “racist.” He wants people to focus on the fact that most black murder victims die at the hands of other blacks. That’s true, and tragic, and fairly irrelevant.

Conservatives, of all people, should understand that misdeeds committed by agents of the state are categorically different from the same acts committed by normal citizens. A father who slaps his son for no good reason, however wrong that may be, is very different from a cop who slaps a citizen for no good reason.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-goldberg-dallas-conservative-black-lives-matter-20160711-snap-story.html
Messages 1 - 2595 of total 2595 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta